Sie sind auf Seite 1von 46

EX.

No:68/14
GeetaVsJoginderKumar
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Present:

DH in person along with Proxy Counsel Sh. Ashok


KumarTanwar.
JDisabsent.
BailablewarrantsissuedagainsttheJDreceivedback

unexecuted.Reportperused.
It appears that the presence of the JD cannot be
securedwithouttakingfurthercoercivestepsagainstJD.
Hence, NBW'sbeissuedagainsttheJDthroughSHO
concerned,returnablefor07.07.2015.

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

Ex.No:29/14
MamtaGuptaVsAshokKhandelwal
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Present:

DHinperson.
JDinperson.
JDhashandedoverasumofRs.15,000/totheDH

againstreceipt.
Listforfurtherpaymenton01.07.2015at2:00P.M.

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

CCNo:7/2/15
LataVs.AmerishSinghaletc.
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Present:
ComplainantinpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.K.R.
Kaushik.
Respondentsno.1,3and4areabsent.
Sh.VikasBhatia,Ld.Counselforrespondents.
Todayagainrespondentshavenotappearedbeforethe
court.ItisorallysubmittedbytheLd.Counselfortherespondents
that respondent no. 1 has met with an accident. Hence,
respondentswillnotappearinpersonbeforethecourttoday.
Intheinterestofjustice,exemptionofrespondentsno.
1,3and4isallowedfortodayonly&theyaredirectedtopositively
appearbeforethecourtonNDOH.
Ld. Counsel for the respondents has filed an
applicationfordischargerespondentno.4.Copysupplied.
Ld.counselfortherespondentshasalsosuppliedthe
advance copyoftheWStothecounselforthecomplainant and
submitsthatheshallplaceonrecordtheWSonNDOH.
Atthisstage,itissubmittedbyboththepartiesthat
theyarereadytosettlethepresentcase.

Courtalsoseesanelementofsettlementinthepresent

case.AssuchthepresentmatterisreferredtoMediationCentre.
Parties are directed to appear before the Mediation Centre,
Dwarka Court,New Delhi on 05.06.2015 at11.00 am & report
beforethiscourton21.07.2015.
Ahlmad is directed to sent the file complete in all
respectswellbeforedate&timefixed.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo.330/02
StateVsRoshanLal
PSNajafgarh
15.05.2015.
PW3/SIRajinderKaur,No.2131/D,CAWCell,NewDelhi(recalled
forcrossexaminationafter19.03.2015).
OnSA
XXXXXXXXbySh.HaneefMohammad,Ld.Counselforaccused
person.
Iwashavingthefileforinvestigationfrom19.08.2002
to27.09.2002andthesamewasgivenbytheReader.Ihadsentthe
requestnoticetoSitaRani.IdonotremembertoallwhomIhave
senttherequestnotice.ItmightbepossiblethatIhavetoldSita
RanitobringPremKumaralongwithher.SitaRaniappearedon
thedatementionedinthenotice.Ihaverecordedthestatementof
theSitaRanionhersecondvisit.Idonotrememberthedateasto
whenIhaverecordedthestatementofSitaRaniandalsowhenshe
firstvisited.OnlythestatementofSitaRaniwasrecordedonher
secondvisit.HoweverIdidnotrecordthestatementofanyperson
onthefirstvisitofSitaRani.Idonotrememberthetimewhenthe
SitaRanivisitedtheCAWCell.IevencannottellastowhetherSita
Raniprelunchorpostlunchperiodasitisthirteenyearsoldcase.
I do not remember as to whether Sita Rani came alone or
accompaniedbysomeone.Ihadmyselfwrittenthestatementof
SitaRani.IcannottellastohowmuchdurationSitaRanistayed.I
never visited the house of the complainant or the accused
personally.IdonotrememberastowhetherIhaveaskedthemto
bringtheoriginalbillofstridhanbills.AgainsaidImusthaveasked

themtobringtheoriginalstridhanbills.Duringmyinvestigation
period original bills were never handed over to me. I have not
mentionedthelistofarticlesintheseizurememowhichisalready
Ex.PW3/A.Ihadnotverifiedthebillsfromtheaccusedaswellas
respective shops mentioned in the seizure memo as the
investigationistransferredfrommeandIhavehandedoverthefile
to the Reader of Inspector CAW Cell. The copy of the bills were
handedovertomebyPremKumar.IcannottellastowhenPrem
KumarcametomeafterthevisitofSitaRani.Ihavenotmadeany
DDentryastovisitofPremKumarorastohandingoverofthebills
as I have mentioned the same in case diary. Marriage card and
marriagephotographswerealsohandedoverbyPremKumar.Ido
notrememberwhetheronthatdayPremKumarhadcometoCAW
Cellaloneoraccompaniedbysomeoneelse.IhadnotmadeSita
RanitosignSection161CrPCstatement.Ihavenotreceivedthe
complaint of the complainant on the basis of which FIR was
registeredasthefilecametomeafterinitialinvestigation.Ihave
not done any proceedings relating to the accused persons. It is
wrongtosuggestthatIhaverecordedthestatementofSitaRanion
my own. It is further wrong to suggest that Sita Rani and Prem
Kumardidnotmeetmeatanypointoftime.Itisfurtherwrongto
suggestthatIhavemanipulatedandfabricatedthethings/case.It
isfurtherwrongtosuggestthatIamdeposingfalsely.

RO&AC

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo.170/14
StateVsGuddu
PSNajafgarh
15.05.2015.
PW1/HCSultanSingh,NO.78/SW,PSDwarkaSouth.
OnSA
On 26.02.2014 I was posted at PS Najafgarh as Head
Constable. OnthatdayIwasworkingasDOandmydutytiming
wasfrom4.00pmto12.00midnight. Onthatday,SIVikashhad
presentedonetehrir.IregisteredtheaboveFIR.ThecopyofFIRis
Ex.PW1/A(OSR) bearing my signature at Point A and I made
endorsement on the said tehrir. My endorsement on the said
tehrir is Ex. PW1/B bearing my signature at Point A. After
registrationofthesameIhandedovertheCopyofFIRandoriginal
rukkatoSIVikashastheinvestigationismarkedtohim.
XXXXXXXXXbySh.S.P.STyagi,Ld.Counselforaccused.
Iwasondutyonthatdaybetween4.00pmto12.00midnight.
Ireceivedtherukkaon9.00pm.OnlySIVikashcametothePolice
StationforregistrationofFIR.Thecomplaintwasconvertedinto
rukka by making endorsement on the written complaint. It is
correct that the complainant did not come to me along with SI
Vikash.ItiscorrectthatIhadnopersonalknowledgeregardingFIR
excepttothecomplaintsenttome.
RO&AC

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo.170/14
StateVsGuddu
PSNajafgarh
15.05.2015.
Present:

Ld.APPfortheState.
AccusedGudduisabsent.
Sh.S.P.S.Tyagi,Ld.counselforaccused.
MHC(M)ispresent.
PW/HCSultanSinghandPW/Sunidhiarepresent.
Exemption application on behalf of accused Guddu

hasbeenmovedbyCounsel.
Heard.Considered.
Forthereasonsstatedintheapplication,exemptionof
theaccusedGudduisallowedfortodayonlysubjecttocondition
thatheshallnotdisputeidentityofthewitnessandtheevidence
shallberecordedinhisabsence.
PW1/HCSultanSinghexamined,crossexaminedand
discharged.
Complainant/PW Sunidhi is present today, however,
sheisdischargedunexaminedtodayasevidencerecordedinother
case.WitnessisbounddownforNDOH.
ListforRPEon06.06.2015.
RemainingPW'sbesummonedforNDOH.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo.143/13
StateVsManoharLal
PSNajafgarh
15.05.2015.
PW4/Ct.JaiPalYadav,No.1255/SW,PostingSector19,DCPOffice,
DWarka.
OnSA
Intheinterveningnightof15.05.2013and16.05.2012I
waspostedatPSNajafgarhasCt..OnthatdayIwasonemergency
dutyandmydutytimingwasfrom8.00pmto8.00am.Onthatday
W/SIKavitahadcalledme frommyofficetoarresttheaccused
ManoharLalandhewasarrestedinmypresenceinthePSitself
videarrestmemoalreadyEx.PW1/BbearingmysignatureatPoint
X. (accused Manohar Lal present in the court today correctly
identified by witness). Thereafter the accused was personally
search in my presence vide personal search already Ex.PW1/C
bearingmysignatureatPointY.
XXXXXXXXbySh.A.K.Thakur,Ld.Counselforaccused.
Ataround12inthenightW/SIKavitacalledme.W/SI
Kavitacalledmeonmypersonalnumber.WhenW/SIKavitacalled
meaccusedandcomplainantbotharepresentinthePSNajafgarh
only.
RO&AC

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo.143/13
StateVsManoharLal
PSNajafgarh
15.05.2015.
PW3/HCOmPrakash,No.803Traffic,PostingMayapuriCircle,
Delhi.
OnSA
On 15.05.2013, I was posted at PS Najafgarh as Head
Constable. OnthatdayIwasworkingasDOandmydutytiming
wasfrom12.00midnightto8.00am.OnthatdayW/SIKavitahad
presentedTehrironwhichIregisteredtheaboveFIR.Thecopyof
FIRisEx.PW3/A(OSR)bearingmysignatureatPointAandImade
endorsement on the said rukka. My endorsement on the said
rukka is Ex. PW3/B bearing my signature at Point A. After
registrationofthesameIhandedovertheCopyofFIRandoriginal
rukkatoW/SIKavita.TheinvestigationismarkedtoW/SIKavita.
XXXXXXXXbySh.A.K.Thakur,Ld.Counselforaccused.
Nil.Opportunitygiven.

RO&AC

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo.143/13
StateVsManoharLal
PSNajafgarh
15.05.2015.
Present:

Ld.APPfortheState.
Complainantinperson.
AccusedManoharLalinpersonalongwithLd.Counsel
Sh.A.K.Thakur.
PW3/HC Om Prakash and PW4/Ct. Jaipal Yadav

examined,crossexaminedanddischarged.
ListforPEon14.07.2015.
RemainingPW'sbesummonedforNDOH.

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo.443/02
StateVsRajesh&Ors.
PSNajafgarh
15.05.2015.
PW3/Ram Pyari W/o HarPal R/o RZ 1/70, New Roshan Pura,
Najafgarh,Delhi.Ageabout70years.
OnSA
The Marriage was solemnized at around 1415 years
backofcomplainantKiranwithaccusedVirender.Ihadsuggested
the boy to complainant's family being a relative of Kiran. After
sometimeofthemarriagetherewasaquarrelandpolicecameat
the residence of accused Virender. I do not know anything else
regardingthiscase.Ihadnotgivenanystatementtothepolice.
Atthisstage,LdAPPseekspermissiontocrossexamine
thewitness.Thesameisallowed.
XXXXXXbyLd.APPfortheState.
ItiscorrectthatSukbirismybrother.Itisalsocorrect
thatSukbirhadspentenoughmoneyinthemarriage.Itiscorrect
thatSukbirhadgivenscooter,colourtv,fridge,allkindoffurniture
andgoldandsilverjeweleryarticles.Ihavebeentoldbyoneofthe
neighbor that the mother in law of the complainant Kiran had
givenbeatingstoherandconsequentlyVirenderleftKirantoher
parental house. It is wrong to suggest that any of the accused
demandedRs.2lakhsortheplotfromthecomplainant.Idonot
rememberwhetherthecomplainantKirancametomeandtoldme
that accused persons were demanding Rs.2 lakhs for the job of
accusedVirender.IalsodonotrememberwhetherIwenttothe
place of accused Virender to inquire the same and for

reconciliation.IneverwenttothehouseoftheaccusedVirenderin
this regard. It is wrong to suggest that the IO in this case have
recordedthestatement.ItiswrongtosuggestthatIamdeposing
falselyattheinstanceoftheaccusedpersons.
XXXXXXXXbySh.J.D.Sharma,Ld.Counselforaccusedperson.
Ihaveseentheabovesaidarticleswhichweregivenin
themarriage.

RO&AC

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo.443/02
StateVsRajesh&Ors.
PSNajafgarh
15.05.2015.
Present:

Ld.APPfortheState.
Complainantinpersonalongwithherfather.
AccusedSaroj,Satbir,SunitaandShakuntalainperson.
AccusedRajeshisabsent.
AccusedVirenderhasalreadyexpired.
Sh.J.D.Sharma,Ld.Counselforaccusedpersons.
Summon issued to PW DO/ASI Chinta Ram received

backwiththereportthathehasexpired.
Inviewofthesame,DOASIChintaRamisdropped
fromthelistofprosecutionwitnesses.
Itissubmittedbythecounselforaccusedpersonsthat
accusedRajeshisunwell.Hence,hecouldnotappeartodaybefore
thecourttoday.
At request of counsel for accused Rajesh, his
exemptionisallowedfortodayonlysubjecttoconditionthathe
shallnotdisputeidentityofthewitnessandtheevidenceshallbe
recordedinhisabsence.
PW3/Ram Pyari examined, crossexamined and
discharged.
ListforPEon09.07.2015.
RemainingPW'sbesummonedforNDOH.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo:343/11
StateVsManojKumar
PS:Najafgarh

15.05.2015.
Present:

Ld.APPfortheState.
AccusedManojisabsent.
Sh.DeepakMehar,ProxyCounselforaccused.
Exemption application on behalf of accused Manoj

KumarhasbeenmovedbyProxyCounsel.
Heard.Considered.
Forthereasonsstatedintheapplication,exemptionof
theaccusedManojKumarisallowedfortodayonly.
Itisorallysubmittedbytheproxycounselforaccused
thathewillpositivelyfilequashingpetitionbeforeHon'bleHigh
CourtofDelhibeforetheNDOH.
Intheinterestofjustice,onelastopportunityisgranted
totheaccusedtofilethesame.
List for quashing of FIR/further proceedings on
22.07.2015.

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

CCNo:419/2/14
PriyankaVsDeepakKakkar&Ors.
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Present:

Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Sh.


RiteshOberoi.
Respondentsno.1,2&4areabsent.
WSaswellasincomeaffidavitnotfiledtherespondent

tilldate.Furtherrespondentshavenotappearedbeforethecourt
despiterepeatedcallssincemorning.Accordingly,respondentsno.
1,2&4areproceededexparte.
At this stage, Ld. counsel for the complainant has
placedonrecordthephotocopyoforderunderSection125CrPCof
Ld. Family Court, Dwarka, whereby interim maintenance @ Rs.
3,000/permonthisgrantedtothecomplainantapartfromthe
litigationexpensesofRs.8,000/.
Inviewofthesame,complainantsubmitsthatsheis
notpressingforreliefofinterimmaintenancebeforethiscourt.
List for exparte complainant evidence/exparte final
argumentson07.07.2015at1:00P.M.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo:411/12
StateVsRajeshSharma&Ors.
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Present:

Ld.APPfortheState.
Accusedpersonsareabsent.
Court notice not issued. Court notice be issued to

accused persons to appear in person before the court on


25.05.2015.

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo:230/07
StateVsRanjeetetc.
PS:Najafgarh

15.05.2015.
Present:

Ld.APPfortheState.
Accused Brijesh and Urmila are permanently
exempted.
AccusedSewaRamandKumeshareabsent.
Sh.AklantJain,Ld.Counselforaccusedpersons.
Finalargumentsheard.
List for clarifications, if any/orders on 25.05.2015 at

2:00P.M.

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

CCNo:20/3/14
RashmiVsNeerajKumar
PS:Najafgarh
underSection156(3)CrPC

15.05.2015.
Present:

Complainantisabsent.
Complainant has not appeared before the court

despiteserviceofnotice.
Intheinterestofjustice,onelastopportunityisgranted
toappearinpersonbeforethecourt,failingwhichapplicationshall
bedismissedfornonprosecution.
Listforappearanceofthecomplainanton15.07.2015.

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

Ex.No:05/14
SakshiVsLalit
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Present:

DHinperson.
JDisabsent.
BailablewarrantsbeissuedagainsttheJDinthesumof

Rs 10,000/ with one surety in the like amount, returnable for


03.07.2015.

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo:109/11
StateVsSadhuRam
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Present:

Ld.APPfortheState.
Accusedisabsent.
Smt.KirpaDevi,SuretyoftheaccusedSadhuRamis
absent.
Issue Bailable warrant against the Kirpa Devi in the

sumofRs5,000/withonesuretyinthelikeamount.
Process under Section 82 CrPC issued against the
accusedSadhuRamreceivedexecuted.Reportperused.
Issuecourtnoticetotheprocessservertorecordinghis
statementfor27.06.2015.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo:409/13
StateVsMohanBharti
PS:Najafgarh

15.05.2015.
Present: Ld.APPforState.

Sh.SanjayKumar,CounselforaccusedMohanBharti.
IO/ASIAsmitaispresent.
Ld.Counselfortheaccusedhasmovedanapplication
formodificationoforderdated06.05.2015.Hehasmovedanother
applicationforgrantofbailofaccusedMohanBhartiunderSection
437CrPC.
StatusreportfiledbyIO.Samebetakenonrecord.IO
further submits that accused Mohan Bharti is not required for
furtherinvestigationinthiscase.
Submissionsheard.Considered.
As the accused is in J/C since 09.05.2015 and
investigationquahimiscomplete,courtdeemsitappropriateto
grantbailtoaccusedMohanBharti.Bothapplicationsareallowed.
AccusedMohanBhartiisadmittedtobailinthesumofRs20,000/
withonelikesuretyandsubjecttofollowingconditions:
1.Accusedwillcooperateintheinvestigationofthiscase.
2.Accusedwillnotinfluence/threaten/inducethewitnesses.
3.Ifincaseaccusedchangeshisresidentialaddressinfuture,he
willgiveduewrittenintimationtotheIO.
4. The violation of above stated conditions will automatically
resultincancellationofbailandforfeitureofsurety.
Boththeapplicationsstanddisposedoff.
Copyoftheorderbegivendasti.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

CCNo:398/2/14
NirupamaVsRohit
PS:DwkNorth

15.05.2015.
Present

Complainantisabsent.
MsAlkaSrivastava,Ldcounselforthecomplainant.
Matter is still pending before Mediation Centre for

16.05.15.
At request, list for report regarding Mediation, if
any/furtherproceedingson03.07.15.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

CCNo:266/2/14
HimanshiVsJiteshLohchab
PS:DwkNorth

15.05.2015.
StatementofcomplainantHimanshiW/oSh.JitenderLochabD/o
Sh.KuldeepSinghDabasR/o603A,JanakResidency,Plotno12,
Sec18A,Dwarka,NewDelhi,agedabout26years.
OnSA
Ihaveamicablysettledthecasewithrespondentno.1
Sh. Jitesh Lohchab who is my husband, towards full and final
settlementamountofRs.40lakhoutofwhichIhavereceivedRs.20
lakh(atthetimeofanticipatorybail&anotheratthetimeoffirst
motion).ThirdinstallmentofRs10Lakhistobepaidatthetimeof
filingsecondmotionofdivorce&thelastinstallmentofRs10Lakh
at the time of quashing of FIR. Copy of MOU/settlement dated
19.01.2015 is Ex. P1. I am ready to abide by all the terms and
conditionsofthesettlement.Imaybepermittedtowithdrawthe
present case. I am giving this statement voluntarily without any
force,threat,coercionorundueinfluence.
RO&AC

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.15.

CCNo:266/2/14
HimanshiVsJiteshLohchab
PS:DwkNorth

15.05.2015.
StatementofSh.JiteshLohchabS/oSh.RajinderSinghLohchab
R/o House no. 1095, Sector 1, Rohtak,Haryana. aged about 32
years.
OnSA
Ihaveamicablysettledthecasewiththecomplainant
whoismywifetowardsfullandfinalsettlementamountofRs.40
lacs out of which I have paid Rs. 20 lakhs (at the time of
anticipatory bail & another at the time of first motion). Third
installmentofRs10Lakhwillbepaidbymeatthetimeoffiling
secondmotionofdivorce&thelastinstallmentofRs10Lakhatthe
time of quashing of FIR. Copy of MOU/settlement dated
19.01.2015 is already Ex. P1. I will abide by all the terms and
conditionsofthesettlement.Iamgivingthisstatementvoluntarily
withoutanyforce,threat,coercionorundueinfluence.
RO&AC

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.15.


15.05.2015.
Present

CCNo:266/2/14
HimanshiVsJiteshLohchab
PS:DwkNorth
ComplainantinpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.YS
Chauhan.
Respondentinperson.
Partieshadamicablysettledthecasebeforethecourt

on28.02.2015towardsfullandfinalsettlementamountofRs.40
lakhsoutofwhichcomplainanthasalreadyreceivedRs.20lakhs.
Complainant submits that she wants to withdraw the present
application.
Separate statements of complainant and respondent
hasbeenrecordedtothiseffect.Boththepartieshaveundertaken
tocomplywithallthetermsandconditionsofsettlement.
Submissionsheard.Considered.
Inviewofstatementsofthecomplainantaswellasof
therespondent,thepresentmatterisdisposedoffassettled.
Filebeconsignedtorecordroom.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

CCNo:133/2/14
ParvinderVsMohanPreet
PS:DwkNorth

15.05.2015.
Present

Complainantisabsent.
Respondent in person along with Ld counsel Ms.
RanjeetBedi.
MatterisfixedforRE.
Counselfor the respondent submits thatevidence of

therespondentisalreadyonrecord,however,sheseekssometime
tomoveanapplicationforseekingopportunitytocrossexamine
thecomplainant.
Listforfurtherproceedingson08.07.15.
Courtnoticebeissuedtothecomplainanttoappear
beforethecourtontheNDOH.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

CCNo:30/2/15
NehaVsNaresh
PS:DwkNorth

15.05.2015.
Present

Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Ms


MeenakshiGupta.
Respondentno1inpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.
VikramBawaja.
Replicationaswellasdetailedincomeaffidavitfiledby

therespondent.Copyofthesameissuppliedtothecomplainant.
Complainantsubmitsthatrespondenthasnotfiledhis
entiredocumentsregardingexpensesasmentionedinhisaffidavit.
Respondent is directed to file the same positively
beforeNDOH.
Listforargumentsoninterimreliefon29.06.15.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

CCNo:374/2/14
ChanderBalaVsGianSingh
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Present

ComplainantinpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.A.K.
Thakur.
Respondent in person along with Ld counsel Sh.
RavinderKumar.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent. Be

takenonrecord.
Matter is fixed for arguments on interim relief of
maintenance.
Counselfortherespondentssubmitsthathehasbeen
recentlyengagedinthiscaseandseeksonelastopportunitytofile
WS.Hefurthersubmitsthatcomplainantwasworkingasamaidin
the house of the respondent and later on she forged certain
documents of her daughter and showed the name of the
respondentasafatherofherdaughterinthosedocuments.Butthe
factisthatrespondentnevermarriedwiththecomplainant.
Initially, counsel for the complainant submits that
complainant is a legal married wife of the respondent, later on
counselforthecomplainantsubmittedthatcomplainantstayedin
aliveinrelationshipwiththerespondentfor1819yearsandlater
on married with him. Complainant also submits that she has
mentionedinherapplicationunderSection12ofPWDVActthat
respondent has stolen allthe documents including the marriage
photographsandGPAofthehouse.
Complainantisdirectedtoleadevidenceregardingher
marriage/liveinrelationshipwithrespondentontheNDOHas

(2)
themattercanonlyproceedfurtherafterthepreliminaryissueof
marriageisdecided.
Listforfurtherproceedingson22.07.15.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

CCNo:234/2/14
PreetiVsVishalGehlot
PS:Najafgarh

15.05.2015.
Present

Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Sh.


Javed.
Respondentno1inpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.
AnilKumar.
MatterisstatedtobependingbeforeMediationcentre

for29.05.15.
Itissubmittedbythecounselforthecomplainantthat
complainantwantstogetthebirthcertificateofherdaughterbut
samecouldnotmadebecauseoflackofanyidentityproofofher
husbandandelectricitybillofthehousewherethechildwasborn.
Respondentsubmitsthathewillmakeeffortstolook
fortheabovedocumentsandbringinthecourtontheNDOH,if
available.
Atrequest,listforreportregardingMediation/further
proceedingson29.05.15.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo:82/10
StateVsRakeshSharma
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Present:

Ld.APPfortheState.
Complainantisabsent.
Accusedinperson.
Accused submits that he shall positively file second

motionofdivorcebeforeFamilycourton20.05.15&thereafterhe
willfilequashingpetitionbeforeHon'bleHighCourtofDelhi.
At request, one last opportunity is granted to the
accusedfailingwhichmatterwillproceedonmerits.
Listforfurtherproceedingson02.07.15.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo:330/02
StateVsRoshanLal
PS:Najafgarh

15.05.2015.
Present:

Ld.APPfortheState.
Motherofthecomplainantispresent.
AccusedRoshaninpersonalongwithLdcounselSh
HaneefMohammad.
AccusedBhagwatiDevi,BhagoDevi,BantoDevi,Pako
Devi,MeeraDeviandDarshanChandarepermanently
exempted.
PW3/Rajinder Kaul further crossexamined and

discharged.
Applicationu/s311CrPCwasmovedbythecounselfor
theaccusedforrecallingPW2SitaRaniasawitness.Itisstatedon
thelastdateofhearingthatmotherofthecounseloftheaccused
got paralysis attack and hence, he could not appear before the
courtforcrossexaminationofthewitness.
ApplicationisstronglyopposedbytheLdAPPonthe
groundthataccusedhadalreadytakensufficientopportunitiesto
crossexaminePW2.
Submissionsheard.Considered.
Courtisoftheopinionthataccusedshouldnotsuffer
duetohiscounsel's personaldifficulty,hence,intheinterestof
justice,applicationu/s311CrPCisallowedandaccusedisgranted
only one effective opportunity to crossexamine PW2 Sita Rani,
failingwhichnofurtheropportunitywillbegranted.
ListforPEon26.05.15.
PW2SitaRaniandremainingwitnessesbesummoned
fortheNDOH.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo:246/12
StateVsRaviParashar
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.

CHARGE
I,ManuGoelKharb,MM/MahilaCourt03,NewDelhi,
doherebychargeyouaccusedRaviParasharasunder:
That after the date of marriage i.e 21.03.2010 of the
complainantBhartiKalrawithyou,atthematrimonialhouseand
atallotherplacesasmentionedincomplaint,withinjurisdictionof
PSBindapur, youRaviParashar subjectedthecomplainantwith
cruelty inconnection with demand of dowry and thereby
committedanoffence punishable U/s 498A IPC and withinmy
cognizance.
Thatonthesamedateandtime,attheaforesaidplace,
youRaviParashar wasentrustedwiththeStridhanarticlesofthe
complainantwhichyourefusedtoreturnondemandandthereby
committed offence punishable U/s 406 IPC and within my
cognizance.
AndIherebydirectthatyoubetriedbythiscourtfor
thesaidoffences.
MM/MahilaCourt03
The charge is read over and explained to the accused, who is
questionedasunder:
Q.Doyoupleadguiltyorclaimtrial?
AnsIdonotpleadguiltyandclaimtrial.

RO&AC

(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,NewDelhi.
15.05.15.

15.05.2015.
Present:

FIRNo:246/12
StateVsRaviParashar
PS:Bindapur
Ld.APPfortheState.
Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Sh
RajeevPandey.
Accusedinpersonalongwith Ld.counselSh.Vinay
KumarJha.
Argumentsonchargeheard.
CounselfortheaccusedRaviParasharhasconcededto

thechargesu/s498A/406IPCagainsttheaccused.
In view of the same, charge for the offence u/s
498A/406IPCisframedagainstaccusedRaviParashar,towhichthe
accusedhaspleadednotguiltyandclaimedtrial.
ListforPEon22.07.2015.
PW'sbesummonedforthenextdateofhearing.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

CCNo:25/3/14
BhartiVsRaviParashar
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Present

Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Sh


RajeevPandey.
Accusedinpersonalongwith Ld.counselSh.Vinay
KumarJha.
In ordersheet dated 24.11.2014, it is reflected that

counsel for the complainant mentioned that cognizance under


Section494IPChasbeentakenbythiscourtinFIRno.246/12,PS
Bindapur however inthelattercase,cognizance is taken forthe
offenceunderSection498A/406IPC. Hence,onetrialcannotbe
conductedinboththesecases.
Summonsinthepresentcomplaintcasehavealready
beenissuedagainstthe accusedbytheCourtofSh.Vikram,Ld.
MM,DwarkaCourts,andtheaccusedhasappearedinpursuance
thereof.
Listnowforprechargeevidenceon22.07.15.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

CCNo:396/2/14
SumanVsShailenderKumar
PS:DwkNorth

15.05.2015.
Present
ComplainantinpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.J.B.
Malik.
Respondentno1inperson.
MatterreceivedbackunsettledfromMediationCentre.
Detailedincomeaffidavitfiledbytherespondent.Be
takenonrecord.Copysupplied.
Vide this order, the court shall dispose off the
application of the complainant regarding interim relief of
maintenance u/s 23(2) of Protection of Women from Domestic
ViolenceAct2005.
Complainanthasstatedinherapplicationthatshegot
marriedwiththerespondentno.1ShailenderKumaron26.02.2009
accordingtoHinduritesandceremoniesandonegirlchildnamely
Ananayawasbornouton02.06.2011ofthewedlock.Butsincethe
date of marriage, she is being tortured and humiliated by the
respondentsforbringinginsufficientdowry.Complainanthasalso
mentioned about demanding money and drinking apart from
variousincidentsofmentalandphysicalcrueltyatthehandsofthe
respondents.Shefurtherallegesthatonmorethanoneoccasion,
respondents have thrown her out of the matrimonial home and
nowsince03.06.2014,sheisstayingatherparentalhouseandis
totallydependentonherparentsforsubsistenceofherself&her
minorchild.Shefurtherallegesthatrespondentno.1isgainfully
employedasaclerkcumcashierinRamgarhiaCooperativeBank
LtdatNo3,SatyamPark,BagatSinghRoad,KrishnaNagar,Delhi
andisdrawingasalaryofRs25,000/permonth&anextraincome
ofRs10,000/fromhispropertyathisnativeplace.
Respondentno1appearedbeforethecourtandfiled

hisreplytotheapplicationundersection23(2)ofPWDVActfiled
bythecomplainantwhereinhedeniedalltheallegationsleveledby
thecomplainant. Respondentno.1hasfiledhisincomeaffidavit
todayinwhichhe statedthathissalaryasRs12,998/permonth
andheearnsRs.54,000/perannumasheisalsoworkingasaLIC
agent.
I have heard the submission of both the parties and
perusedallthedocuments.
Complainanthasnotbroughtonrecordanydocument
toshowthatrespondentno1isearningRs.35,000/permonth.
Now the admitted position is that respondent no.1 is currently
earningaroundRs.17,500/permonth.So,keeping2portionsof
the admitted income for himself, respondent no. 1 Shailender
KumarisdirectedtopayaninterimmaintenanceofRs.4,300/per
monthforthecomplainant&Rs4,300/permonthforthegirlchild
namelyAnanayafromthedateoffilingofapplicationtillthedate
offinaldisposalofthiscase.
Respondentno.1isfurtherdirectedtoclearthearrears
of maintenance within 3 months from the date of the order.
Paymenthastobemadeonthe5thdayofeachmonthbydepositing
the same directly in the bank account of the complainant, the
details of which shall be provided by the complainant to the
protectionofficeraswellasrespondentShailenderKumar.
Amountofmaintenancepaidinanyotherproceedings
shallbeadjusted.Applicationstandsdisposedoffwithregardtothe
interimreliefofmaintenance.
ListforCEon24.07.2015.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

CCNo:13/2/15
KrishnaVsJoginderKumar
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Present

ComplainantinpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.YK
Dubey.
Respondentno1inpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.S
PVerma.
Videthisorder,courtshalldisposeofftheapplication

of the complainant regarding interim relief of maintenance u/s


23(2)ofProtectionofWomenfromDomesticViolenceAct2005.
Complainanthasstatedinherapplicationthatshegot
married with respondent no.1 Joginder Kumar on 13.02.2005
according to Hindu rites and ceremonies and 'twin' children
namely Lakshya & Deepika were born out of the wedlock on
30.12.2006 but since the day of marriage, she is being tortured
mentally and physically by the respondent no. 1 and other
respondents for demand of dowry. It is further alleged that
respondentno.1isinahabitofdrinkingandharassherthereafter
andrespondentno1pressurizesthecomplainanttoseekadivorce
so that he can marry his girlfriend and also threatened her to
commit suicide ifshedoesnot leave him.Complainant submits
thatsheisnotworkingandissolelydependentonherparentsfor
subsistenceofherself.
Respondentno.1appearedbeforethecourtandfiled
hisreplytotheapplicationundersection12ofPWDVActfiledby
thecomplainantwhereinhedeniedalltheallegationslevelledby
the complainant. In his detailed income affidavit, he has
mentionedthatheisdoingaprivatejobanddrawingasalaryofRs
14,000/ per month and he has a liability to maintain the twin
childrenwhoarelivingwithhim.
I have heard the submission of both the parties and

perusedallthedocuments.
Complainanthasnotbroughtonrecordanydocument
toshowtheincomeofrespondentno.1.Intheentirereplyfiledby
the respondent, there is no averment regarding the earning
capacityofthecomplainant.
Asperthesubmissionmadebyrespondentno1,his
admitted salary is Rs 14,000/ per month. Respondent no. 1 is
liabletomaintainhiswifeKrishna&thetwochildren.So,keeping2
portions of the admitted income for himself, respondent no. 1
JoginderKumarisdirectedtopayaninterimmaintenanceofRs.
2,800/permonthforthecomplainantfromthedateoffilingof
applicationi.e.20.01.15tillthedateoffinaldisposal.
Respondentno.1isfurtherdirectedtoclearthearrears
of maintenance within 3 months from the date of the order.
Paymenthastobemadeonthe5thdayofeachmonthbydepositing
the same directly in the bank account of the complainant, the
detailsofwhichshallbeprovidedbythecomplainanttothe
protectionofficeraswellasrespondentno.1JoginderKumar.
Amountofmaintenancepaidinanyotherproceedings
shallbeadjusted.Applicationstandsdisposedoffwithregardtothe
interimreliefofmaintenance.
At this stage, complainant has moved another
application u/s 23 (2) r/w Sec 21 of PWDV Act for seeking
temporary custody of the children Lakshya & Deepika. Copy
supplied.
List for reply/arguments on the application on
29.05.2015.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

CCNo:64/2/15
ShikhaVsSahilSaranSahai
PS:DwkNorth

15.05.2015.

Fresh file received from facilitation Centre. It be checked and


registered.
Present:
ComplainantinpersonalongwithLdCounselSh.Jai
DevSolanki.
This is an application filed u/s 12 of Protection of
WomenfromDomesticViolenceAct2005.
Sufficient material has been placed on record to
proceed against respondents no 1 to 4. Summon be issued to
respondentsno.1to4onfilingofPF/RCwithin5workingdays.In
case ofrefusal or nonavailability or house locked, summons be
servedbywayofaffixation.
Complainanthasmentionedinparaxiiiatpageno8of
theapplicationthatrespondentno1isworkinginDubai.Hence,
Respondent no. 1 be summoned, at his Dubai address, to be
furnishedbythecomplainant,atthetimeoffilingPF.
Notice be issued to Protection Officer for filing DIR
reportwithinoneweek.
Fixforappearanceandreplyon09.07.2015.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo:180/12
StateVsManishKumarSuri
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Cancellation report received from facilitation centre. It be
checkedandregistered.
Present:

Ld.APPfortheState.
Cancellationreportperused.Considered.
True copy of order of Honble High Court of Delhi

dated 27.02.2015inCrl.M.C.no.755/2015titledManishKumar
Suri & Ors.Vs.The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr. (Hon'ble Mr.
JusticeManmohan Singh)received,vide which presentFIR no.
180/12, u/s 498A/406/34 IPC, PS Bindapur and the consequent
proceedingshavebeenquashedaftersettlement.
Inviewofthesame,accusedstandsdischarged.
Personal bond and surety bond of accused stands
discharged. Original documents, if any, be released to the
authorizedpersonsonproperreceiptandendorsement,ifany,be
cancelled.
FilebeconsignedtoRecordRoom.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo:737/14
StateVsRaju@Thapa
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Freshchargesheetreceivedfromfacilitationcentre.Itbechecked
andregistered.
Present:

Ld.APPfortheState.
Fileperused.Considered.
I take cognizance of the offence u/s

451/354/323/506/34 IPC against accused persons mentioned in


column no 11 i.e. Raju @ Thapa & Harshit Kashyav. Ahlmad is
directedtoaffixmiscellaneouspaperswiththefile.
Summonsbeissuedtoboththeabovenamedaccused
persons and notice to their sureties for appearance, supply of
copiesandregularbailon09.07.15.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo:134/12
StateVsDevinderKumar
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Freshchargesheetreceivedfromfacilitationcentre.Itbechecked
andregistered.
Present:

Ld.APPfortheState.
Fileperused.Considered.
Itakecognizanceoftheoffenceu/s 498A/406/34 IPC

againstaccusedpersonsmentionedincolumnno11i.e.Devinder
Kumar, Premvati & Harbans Lal. Ahlmad is directed to affix
miscellaneouspaperswiththefile.
Summonsbeissuedtoalltheabovenamedaccused
persons and notice to their sureties for appearance, supply of
copiesandregularbailon08.07.15.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

FIRNo:790/14
StateVsRoshan
PS:DwkNorth

15.05.2015.
Freshchargesheetreceivedfromfacilitationcentre.Itbechecked
andregistered.
Present:

Ld.APPfortheState.
Fileperused.Considered.
I take cognizance of the offence u/s 354/354D IPC

againstaccusedpersonsmentionedincolumnno11i.e.Roshan@
Santosh.Ahlmadisdirectedtoaffixmiscellaneouspaperswiththe
file.
Summonsbeissuedtotheabovenamedaccusedand
noticetohissuretyforappearance,supplyofcopiesandregular
bailon07.07.15.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.

CCNo:194/2/14
NishaVsChaitanyaKumar
PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.
Present:
Complainant in person with Counsel Sh. A.K.
Thakur.
Respondentno.2inperson.
Respondentno.1&3areabsent.
Sh.AmitabhJha,Counselonbehalfoftherespondents.
Counsel for the respondents has moved separate
applicationsonbehalfofrespondentChaitanyaKumarandManju
Roy for their exemption from personal appearance. Both the
applicationsareappendedwithmedicaldocumentsofChaitanya
Kumar. Another application is moved by the counsel for the
respondentu/s25&28(2)ofPWDVActforwaiverofcostimposed
uponalltherespondentsontheLDOHandforextensionoftimeto
file WS and income affidavit of the respondent. In all the above
applications(exemptionapplicationsaswellaswaiverofcostand
enlargement of time to file WS and detailed income affidavit),
counsel for the respondents has taken the same ground that
respondentno.1issufferingfromseverementaldisorderandis
underpsychiatrictreatmentsinceJan.2015.
Applications are opposed bythe complainant on the
ground that she had filed the application under Section 12 of
PWDVActlongbackbuttilldaterespondentshavenotevenfiled
WS.
Submissionsheard.Considered.
Respondents have placed on record certain medical
documentsandacertificateissuedbythePsychiatricconsultant
Dr.SumitPathareinwhichapartfromotherthingsthedoctorhas
specifically mentioned that patient is not fit for travel whereas
generally, in medical field no psychiatric consultant gives a
certificatetotheeffectwhetherthepatientisfittotravel.So,court

has certain reservations regarding the medical certificate of


ChaitanyaKumarfiledbythecounselfortherespondent.
But,forthetimebeing,believingthemedicalailment
of resp no. 1 and the certificate of the doctor to be genuine,
applications for exemption of respondents no. 1 and 3 from
personal appearance is allowed for today. For the same reason,
applicationofrespondentno.1ChaitanyaKumarforextensionof
timeisallowedandheisgrantedanotheropportunitytofileWS
and detailed income affidavit. Further, respondent Chaitanya
Kumar is directed to appear in person before the court on the
NDOH,sothatcourtcanmakeanassessmentregardingthemental
conditionoftherespondentandtillthenhisrequestforwaivingof
costiskeptpending.
So far as submissions of respondent no. 2 and 3 for
extendingtimetofileWSorwaivingcostareconcerned,courtis
unabletofathomanyreasonfortheirnonfilingofWStilldate.On
the last date of hearing, right to file WS was made subject to
paymentofcostofRs.2000/eachbytherespondentsandtoday
againratherthanfilingtheWS,respondentsaremoreinterestedin
movinganapplicationforwaiverofcostandsomemoretimetofile
WSwithoutanyplausibleexplanationtothiseffect.Noreasonis
madeouteitherforwaiverofcostorforextensionoftimetofile
WS. Accordingly, the said applications are dismissed qua
respondent no. 2 & 3. Further as no WS is filed today also,
respondentno2&3areproceededExparte.
List for appearance of respondent no.1 and further
proceedingson08.07.15.
(ManuGoelKharb)
MM,(MahilaCourt)03
DwarkaCourts,ND.
15.05.2015.