Sie sind auf Seite 1von 37

TRANSPORTATION

AND POWER
GENERATION
AUDIT CRITERIA

TPG-AC7114
Issued 2011-05
Revised 26-Jun-13
Superseding N/A

AUDIT CRITERIA FOR NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING (NDT) SUPPLIERS


ACCREDITATION PROGRAM

Editorial changes made on 26-Jun-13 to section 6.0


Editorial Change made to Section 2.2.3 on 17-April 2015
1

SCOPE
These Audit Criteria are intended for use to survey a facility seeking approval for the NDT process. This criteria is
supplemented by Audit Criteria for the specific NDT processes to be accredited to ensure that NDT suppliers meet
the requirements for approval in Nondestructive Testing.
The purpose of this Audit Criteria is to provide a means to verify and document that systems are in place to control
the process and that the process procedures are being followed.
Although specific Audit Criteria for evaluation of the general quality system is not included within the text of this
checklist, quality system requirements do form a part of the standard used in the NDT Accreditation program. As
such, auditors may identify and record nonconformances related to the quality system. The supplier must address
these nonconformances in order to obtain Accreditation.

GENERAL INFORMATION
References
SAE Publications:

Available from SAE, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15086-0001.

AS9100

Quality Systems Aerospace model for Quality Assurance in Design,


Development, Production, Installation and Servicing

ISO Publications:

Available from the American National Standards Institute, 11 West


42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.

ISO 9100

Quality Systems Aerospace model for Quality Assurance in Design,


Development, Production, Installation and Servicing

ISO 10012-1:1992

International Standard Quality Assurance Requirements for Measuring Equipment Part


1 Metrological Confirmation Systems for Measuring Equipment

ANSI/NCSL Z540

Calibration Laboratories, and Measuring and Test Equipment General Requirements

EN Publications:

Available from BSI, 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4 4AL. UK.

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

2.1

TPG-AC7114

-2-

EN ISO Publications:

Available from BSI, 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4 4AL. UK.

EN ISO 9000 Series

Quality Management and Quality Assurance Standards - Guidelines;

EN ISO/IEC 17025

General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and


calibration Laboratories.

ASNT Publications:

Available from The American Society of Nondestructive Testing, 1711 Arlingate Lane,
P.O. Box 28518, Columbus, Ohio 43228-0518

SNT-TC-1A-2006

Personnel Qualification and Certification in Nondestructive Testing

Instructions for the Auditors


In completing this assessment, auditors are instructed to respond with a Yes or No to address compliance with
each statement of requirement. For any negative responses, the auditor must clearly indicate in the NCR if the
No reflects noncompliance with respect to existence, adequacy, and/or compliance. Existence relates to
evidence of a documented procedure or policy, adequacy relates to the completeness of the procedure or policy
and compliance relates to evidence of effective implementation. This checklist includes the use of the word shall
which indicates a clear requirement that must be met at all times. The word may indicates a possible resolution
to a requirement or one recommended method to achieve a given requirement, but does not represent the only
way to meet that requirement. In addition the checklist includes the term Compliance Assessment Guidance.
This term is used to reflect the expectation when answering the checklist question as YES or N/A.
All negative responses require a Nonconformance Report (NCR). Not Applicable (N/A) responses do not require
an explanation unless otherwise noted. There is only one plausible reason for an N/A, which is, that a particular
operation or issue is not being used at the supplier. There are no N/As simply for a lack of a customer
requirement. If a system is in use, then all questions pertaining to that system are applicable. If verification of
results require documentation it shall be so noted in this checklist.
The audit results shall not include any customer proprietary information. Technical information on parts which have
been designated Export Controlled License Required, (EC-LR) cannot be input into eAuditNet. If auditors have
any questions about this, they should contact the Staff Engineer for directions.

2.2

Instructions for the Supplier


2.2.1

Prior to the Audit


The supplier must complete a self-audit using TPG-AC7114 and all applicable slashsheets in preparation
for this audit. All internally identified nonconformances should be corrected prior to the actual audit.
Nonconformances identified as part of the audit with potential product impact may, at the discretion of the
suppliers customer, require a Verification Corrective Action (VCA) audit at the suppliers expense. The
supplier should forward the following to the assigned auditor, as directed by PRI, 30 days prior to the
scheduled audit:
NDT Data:
a.
List of processes to be approved.
b.
Copy of applicable NDT process procedure(s) and certification procedure.
c.
Copy of the completed supplier self audit using the applicable checklists.
d.
List of Approved NDT Personnel including Level 3s. Supplier may use NDT Attachment

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

e.
f.

-3-

TPG-AC7114-A or another format as long as all of the identified information is present (name,
stamp/identification number, certification dates, eye exam dates, vision correction required, years
of experience, certification levels and NDT method).
List of NDT procedures (index/table of contents only).
List of applicable NDT processing specifications (military, government,
industry, [AMS, etc.], customer).

The format for providing the different required lists may be accessed via the Electronic Database or may be
generated by the supplier and attached electronically to the audit package.
2.2.2

During the Audit


The supplier shall provide for an in-briefing with the auditor. Key members of the suppliers staff should
attend the in-briefing so the audit purpose, methods and assessment processes can be discussed. These
may include the Responsible Level 3, the Quality Manager, internal audit personnel and others as deemed
necessary by the auditor or supplier.
Working space for the auditor with desks or tables, chairs, telephone, etc., shall be made available.
A final out-briefing will be conducted at the completion of the audit. Each nonconformance and
observation will be reviewed at least daily and the supplier will be given the opportunity to discuss
proposed corrective action or to provide any additional information. Note: The PRI Staff Engineers or the
suppliers customer may, upon review, change the auditor's determination of a finding.

2.2.3

Following the Audit


In accordance with established procedures, the supplier has 14 calendar days from the time the auditor
submits the audit to submit a corrective action plan, identify effectivity dates for each NCR and when
applicable, objective evidence. This response shall be entered directly into PRIs Electronic Database. The
response must address the root cause of the nonconformance from a systems management approach,
the immediate action taken to resolve the discrepancy and the actions taken or to be taken to preclude
recurrence.
PRI staff or the suppliers customer may, after review of the audit report, require additional information or
may find cause to issue additional findings. Note: Final authority over the audit report, acceptibility of
corrective actions and accreditation recommendation rests with the suppliers customer.

INFORMATION

3.1

General Information
Nature of Business:

___________________________________________

In House Products (Captive House)


Total Number of Employees

3.1.1

Accepts Outside Work


Number of QA Personnel
(EXCLUDE NDT)

Number of Certified NDT Personnel

Audit Contacts
Identify the Primary Contacts for the Audit (Name/Title)

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

-4-

Name

3.2

Title

Quality Systems Approvals


3.2.1

Is there evidence of a current approval related to quality system registered to


AS9100 / EN9100, AC7004, or ISO17025 (NDT Test Houses only)?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Information only question. N/A is


acceptable if the above Quality System accreditations are not in place. Auditor
is required to provide an explanation.
Auditing/Certifying Agency

3.3

Audit Criteria

Certificate Issue
Date

Certificate Expiration
Date

Corrective Actions
3.3.1

For re-accreditation audits, were corrective actions from the previous audit
implemented?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Verification of corrective actions taken as a result


of nonconformances identified during the previous audit will be conducted by the
auditor. In addition, the auditor shall verify corrective actions associated with a
previous audit that resulted in failure. The auditor shall use investigative means to
assure these are implemented.
3.3.2

Does the suppliers corrective action system, as it applies to the NDT area, ensure that
the required changes in procedures resulting from corrective action are implemented
and effective?

NDT QUALITY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

4.1

Customer Requirements
4.1.1

YES NO

Responsibility

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

-5-

Has a Level 3 been given responsibility for identifying and assuring implementation of
customer NDT requirements for the following?
Review of NDT requirements
Sequence of NDT operations
NDT procedure development and approval
NDT technique development/review and approval
Training of NDT personnel
Examination of NDT personnel

YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES

NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The supplier shall identify those responsible for
identification and implementation of customer NDT requirements. The Level 3 in the
method shall review NDT requirements and assure the proper sequence for NDT
operations is achieved as specified by the appropriate process standard and/or
drawing. Verification of proper sequencing may be accomplished by one of the
examples noted below, but is not limited to these options:
1) The Level 3 signature on the routing and/or checklist, approving the sequence.
2) Use of a sequence template for specific product, or family of product, which has
been approved by the Level 3.
3) Approval of part drawings which include the sequence of operations by the Level 3.
The Level 3 shall be responsible for NDT procedure and/or technique development,
review and subsequent approval. The Level 3 shall ensure that NDT personnel are
properly trained and examined in accordance with the appropriate standard.

4.2

Procurement
4.2.1

Sub Tier Flow-down


Is there a procurement procedure to ensure that Prime contractor requirements are
adequately imposed on the sub-tier supplier that includes but is not limited to
calibration services, cleaning/etching facilities, process control tests, materials and
equipment and inspection facilities as related to NDT?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The procedure shall address flow-down of the


specification(s), or standard(s), to which services or materials are procured,
certification requirements, accuracy, range and any other data pertinent to justify
acceptance.
4.2.2

Is there evidence of compliance to the procedure?


Compliance Assessment Guidance: Procurement Compliance depends on quality
system imposed

4.3

YES NO

Internal NDT Audits


4.3.1

Procedure
Is there a procedure requiring an annual internal audit of the NDT System and does it
address a review of the NDT inspection process, the associated documentation,
personnel certifications, NDT process procedure adequacy and equipment?

4.3.2

YES NO

Internal Audit Scope

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

Does the annual internal NDT audit include a review of the NDT inspection process,
the associated documentation (planning, travelers and inspection certifications),
personnel certifications (for existence and completeness), NDT process procedure
adequacy and equipment?

4.4

-6-

YES NO

Performance Review
4.4.1

Procedure
Is there a procedure implemented defining performance reviews and is it approved by
a Level 3?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The procedure for performance reviews may be


contained within the suppliers Written Practice.
4.4.2

Performance Review Scope


Is there a periodic and documented review of processing and inspection of hardware
for each certified Level 1 and Level 2 individual who is qualified to process hardware?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The auditor shall verify that the documentation
utilized is adequate to indicate that parts were processed and/or evaluated per the
specified requirements. The evaluation and documentation should follow the format of
a practical exam.

4.4.3

Review Performance
Is this review performed by the Level 3 and records retained?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The review shall include the ability of the individual
to process hardware in accordance with approved procedures and/or, when allowed,
evaluate and disposition hardware in accordance with customer requirements.
Documentation of such reviews shall be maintained on file for review. Retention period
shall be in accordance with the suppliers record retention policy.

4.5

NDT Inspection Status


4.5.1

Procedure
Is there a procedure addressing the method to be used for control and identification of
NDT inspection status?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Identifiers may be in the form of signatures,


initials, stamps, clock numbers or any other method that can be controlled.
4.5.2

Status Control Record


Does the procedure address the requirements for a record to be maintained for the
issuance, recall and traceability of all inspection status identifiers?

YES NO

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114
4.5.3

Actions
Are appropriate actions included in the control procedure to deal with lost status
identifiers, misuse of identifiers, reassigned identifiers and removal of names of
previously authorized, but reassigned personnel?

4.5.4

YES NO

NDT Inspection Records


Are records of personnel identification (e.g., signatures, initials, stamp impression,
clock number, etc.) maintained for all personnel required or authorized to sign-off on
any NDT inspection sequence, NDT inspection report or NDT procedure?

4.5.6

YES NO

NDT Inspector's Identification


Is the inspection status identifier traceable to the assigned inspector?

4.5.5

-7-

YES NO

Control of NDT Inspection Identifiers


Were all stamps/inspection status identifiers properly controlled to prevent misuse?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Control is to be considered as the suppliers


procedure defines it but at a minimum means that the stamp or identifier is not
available to be used by anyone other than the individual to whom it is assigned.

5.0

NDT QUALIFICATION / CERTIFICATION NAS-410 / EN 4179

N/A

Note: Reference NAS-410 / EN 4179 for detailed requirements.


N/A only if SNT-TC-1A, Section 6.0 applies.

5.1

Written Practice
The written practice shall address, or identify, the following as a minimum?
Compliance Assessment Guidance: The expectation is that each item required by section 5.1 be addressed in
detail in the suppliers written practice. It is not adequate to merely reference NAS 410 for these items.

5.1.1

Written Practice Approval


Is the training, qualification and certification of NDT personnel written practice
approved by the Responsible Level 3?

5.1.2

YES NO

Governing Standard
Does the written practice identify the standard(s) to which it is compliant?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: This is to include unique customer requirements,


e.g. NDTQ, RPS908, SPOC 165.7, etc.
5.1.3

NDT Techniques
Does the written practice identify the specific techniques within each method as
defined by the employer or NANDTB?

5.1.4

YES NO

Levels of Qualification
Does the written practice address the applicable levels of qualification used by the
supplier?

YES NO

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114
5.1.5

Personnel Duties and Responsibilities


Does the written practice address the required personnel duties and responsibilities?

5.1.6

YES NO

Experience Requirements
Does the written practice address the experience requirements?

5.1.8

YES NO

Training Program
Does the written practice address the required training requirements?

5.1.7

-8-

YES NO

Examination Requirements
Does the written practice address the examination requirements?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance:


a) The written practice shall include provisions for the designation of the individual(s)
or organization(s) responsible for administering examinations, the number of
examination questions to be administered, and the specific visual acuity examination
method(s) to be used. If required, the use of a general examination for recertification
shall be documented in the written practice.
b) If a Level 2 develops work instructions, the suppliers written practice shall address
those duties and the practical examination shall include the developing of work
instructions.
5.1.9

Records
Does the written practice address the required records to be maintained?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The written practice shall include the designation
of the individual(s) or organization(s) responsible for maintaining the qualification and
certification records and where such records shall be kept.
5.1.10 Loss / Reinstatement of Certification
Does the written practice address the following:
5.1.10.1

Expiration?

YES NO

5.1.10.2

Suspension?

YES NO

5.1.10.3

Revocation?

YES NO

5.1.10.4

Reinstatement of certification?

YES NO

5.1.11 Additional Training


Does the written practice address the requirements for additional training of personnel
that fail the certification/re-certification examinations?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Candidates failing any general, specific or


practical examination shall receive additional training before attempting re-examination
of the failed exam. The additional training shall be documented and shall address
those areas found deficient in the candidate's skills or knowledge.
PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

-9-

5.1.12 Re-examinations
Does the written practice address the requirements for re-examination of those
personnel who have failed their certification/re-certification examinations or have had
their certifications revoked?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The re-examination shall not use the same written
tests or test samples that were used in the initial examination. The re-examination test
must contain a minimum of 25% new questions.
5.1.13 Certification and Recertification Requirements
Does the written practice address the certification and recertification requirements?

YES NO

5.1.14 Training Outlines


Does the written practice reference or include the NDT training outlines used by the
employer?

YES NO

5.1.15 Administration
Does the written practice include the identification of the individual(s) or
organization(s) responsible for administering and maintaining all or part of the
employer's certification program?

YES NO

5.1.16 Level 3 Re-certification Option


Does the procedure for qualification and certification define the re-certification option
to be used for the Level 3, whether it is by examination and/or by a credit system?

5.2

YES NO

Personnel Records
5.2.1

Certification Records
Are all required records of training, qualification and certification of NDT personnel
maintained and made available for review?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: All training, qualification, and certification records


shall be maintained in accordance with the employers written practice and shall be
made available for audit by the facility's customers or regulatory agencies. When an
NANDTB is used, the scores for the latest written and practical examinations shall be
kept by the employer but actual examinations may be kept by the NANDTB.
5.2.2

Identification / Scope of Certification


Do the records indicate the name of the certified individual?

5.2.3

Scope of Certification
Do the records indicate the level, method and technique(s) for which the individual is
certified?

5.2.4

YES NO

Certification Authorization
Do records include the name and signature of the employers representative
authorizing the certification?

5.2.5

YES NO

YES NO

Availability of Qualification Examinations

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114
Are the latest written and practical examinations on file?

- 10 YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The facility shall maintain the results of all
qualification examinations. A copy of the latest examinations shall be made available
for review during the audit. Documentation shall be adequate to ascertain all pertinent
facts surrounding the exams. In the case of the practical exam, evidence shall exist
that the candidate has documented their results. In the case where a recognized
Independent National Aerospace NDT board (NANDTB) provides the qualification
examinations, these do not need to be maintained at the suppliers facility.
5.2.6

Examination Scores
Are the scores for immediately previous examinations on file?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The answer would be N/A only if the individual in
question has only taken one set of examinations for a particular NDT method at the
employer being audited, i.e., no previous examinations.
5.2.7

Certification Dates
Are the certification and expiration dates of current certification(s) included in the
records?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Certification for all levels is considered to expire


at the end of the corresponding month in which the certification began.
5.2.8

NDT Experience History


Do records include NDT experience history including any previous certifications, both
with current and previous employers sufficient to justify satisfaction of experience
requirements for qualification?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: A candidates experience with a previous


employer may be accepted by the current employer only if such experience is
documented and approved by the Responsible Level 3 or NANDTB.
5.2.9

NDT Training History


Do the records include the NDT training history that identifies the source, type of
training, dates of training and course hours?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance:


a) For personnel credited with previous training, or personnel not certified
within 12 months of their training, refresher training must be provided. Previous
training must be documented to be accepted by the employer. As a minimum,
refresher training shall cover products, equipment set-up, operation and
standardization, specific operating procedures, applicable techniques,
b) General, specific and practical training may be obtained with the employer or an
outside agency, but shall always be supplemented by practical on-the-job training with
the employer.

5.2.10 Equivalent Experience


Is documentation on file regarding equivalent experience accepted by the responsible
Level 3 to meet qualification requirements?

YES NO N/A

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 11 -

Compliance Assessment Guidance: For personnel previously certified under NAS 410,
EN 4179 or other recognized NDT qualification program, the adequacy and
equivalency of their previous experience shall be determined and documented by the
Responsible Level 3 or NANDTB.
5.2.11 Education
When used to meet qualification requirements, do records indicate the extent of and
provide documentation of formal education?

YES NO NA

5.2.12 Equivalent Training


Is documentation on file regarding equivalent training accepted by the Responsible
Level 3 to meet qualification requirements?

YES NO NA

Compliance Assessment Guidance: For personnel previously certified under NAS 410,
EN 4179 or other recognized NDT qualification program, the adequacy and
equivalency of their previous training shall be determined and documented by the
Responsible Level 3 or NANDTB.
5.2.13 Level 1 Limited
Is documentation appropriate to justify Level 1 Limited certifications and is it
maintained with the Responsible Level 3?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: For Level 1-Limited certifications, the case-bycase justification, the cognizant engineering organizations approval, the training and
experience hours, the length of the certification (up to 1 year), the specific NDT test to
be performed, the specific hardware to be tested, and, if applicable, the approval to
accept reject hardware.
5.2.14 Responsible Level 3
Do records indicate that the employer has designated a Responsible Level 3?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The employer shall identify, in writing a


Responsible Level 3 to act on its behalf in matters regarding the NDT qualification and
certification process. The Responsible Level 3 shall be certified in accordance with
NAS 410/EN4179 as a Level 3 in one or more NDT methods, and shall have a
thorough knowledge of the written instructions, codes, specifications and standards
used by the employer. He/she shall also have a thorough knowledge of the materials,
components, product technologies, NDT methods and NDT techniques used by the
employer. Additional Level 3 Examiners as defined in NAS 410/EN4179may be
identified and delegated in writing as necessary to provide coverage for all methods
used by the employer. The Responsible Level 3 may be an outside agency but in this
case he/she can only qualify personnel, as only the employer can certify personnel.

5.3

Examinations
5.3.1

Administration and Grading


Is there evidence that the qualification examinations have been administered and
graded by the Responsible Level 3 or Examiner?

YES NO N/A

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 12 -

Compliance Assessment Guidance:


a) In the case where an NANDTB provides the qualification examinations, these do
not need to be maintained at the suppliers facility and question is N/A.
b) The administration and grading of all examinations shall be the responsibility of the
Responsible Level 3 or Examiner. All practical examinations shall be administered by
the Responsible Level 3 or Examiner. Responses to essay and fill-in questions must
be evaluated by the Responsible Level 3 or Examiner, certified in the applicable test
method, to verify the candidate's adequate understanding of the subject matter.
5.3.2

Examination Delegation
If the Level 3 delegates the administration of examinations, was the delegation
documented?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The Responsible Level 3 or Examiner may


delegate in writing the administration and grading of examinations using multiple
choice or true/false questions to non-Examiner personnel. All practical examinations
shall be administered by the Responsible Level 3 or Examiner certified in the
applicable test method.

5.3.3

Administration Limits
Does evidence exist that qualification exams have not been administered by a
subordinate or to ones self?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: In no case can an examination be administered


by one's self or by a subordinate.
5.3.4

Exam Schedule for Level 1 Limited


Are Level 1 Limited personnel examinations administered yearly?

5.3.5

Exam Schedule for Level 1 and Level 2


Are the Level 1 and Level 2 personnel re-certified at a frequency not to exceed five
years?

5.3.6

YES NO N/A

Exam Schedule for Level 3


Are Level 3 personnel re-certified at a frequency not to exceed five years?

5.3.7

YES NO N/A

YES NO N/A

Level 3 Re-certification by Points


When points are utilized for Level 3 re-certification, is the required documentation on
file?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance:


a) Documentation for recertification shall be submitted to the Responsible Level 3 or
NANDTB at least 14 days prior to the expiration date of the certification.
b) Application for Level 3 recertification by the Responsible Level 3 shall be made
directly to the employer, the applicable regulatory agency, or applicable NANDTB.
This application shall provide documented evidence that the requirements outlined in
NAS-410/EN-4179, Annex A have been met. A copy of this application shall be
maintained in the Level 3 candidates NDT personnel records.

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114
5.3.8

- 13 -

Level 3 Re-certification by Examination


When examinations are utilized for Level 3 re-certification, is the required
documentation on file?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Specific and practical examinations (at a


minimum) equivalent to initial certification are required for re-certification.
5.3.9

Re-certification Examinations
Are Level 1, Level 2 and Level 1 Limited re-certification examinations equivalent to
those given for initial certification?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Only specific and practical examinations


equivalent to initial certification are required for re-certification.
5.3.10 Examination Scoring System
Does the examination scoring system for qualification examinations conform to the
requirements of the governing standard?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: All examination scores shall be of equal weight in


determining the average score. For example, if only a specific and practical
examination is administered for recertification, only those scores shall be factored into
the average score. If a general examination is also given for recertification, the general
score shall also be factored into the average score. For a Level 3 recertified using
points, the score for the hands-on practical, if administered, will be used as the
average score. Scores for ASNT, EN 473 or ISO 9712 NDT certificates scored as
pass/fail and used in lieu of the general examination shall be assigned a value of
80%.
5.3.11 General Examination Questions
Do the examinations have the minimum number of questions and does the question
content cover the subject material for the level and method for which certification is
sought?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The general examination for all levels shall be a
closed book examination (An examination administered without access to any
reference materials) covering the cross-section of the applicable method at the
appropriate level. A minimum of 10 questions shall be administered for the general
examination for Level 1-Limited. A minimum of 40 questions shall be administered for
the general examination at Levels 1, 2 or 3. For Level 3, the general examination
questions shall address the general knowledge of other methods used by the
employer as well as the method for which certification is sought. Passing a basic
examination covering the other NDT methods used before passing any NDT method
examination shall be considered satisfactory evidence the other NDT methods have
been satisfactorily covered. Possession of a current ASNT, EN 473 or ISO 9712 NDT
certificate at the appropriate level by the candidate may be satisfactory evidence that
the general examination requirement is satisfied as defined in the employers written
practice.
5.3.12 Specific Examination Questions
Do the examinations have, at least, the minimum number of questions and do the

YES NO N/A

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 14 -

specific examination questions reflect the specifications, codes, equipment, operating


procedures and test techniques used within the facility?
Compliance Assessment Guidance: The specific examination for all levels shall be an
open book examination (Reference material such as specifications, tables, formulas,
etc. may be provided as determined by the Responsible Level 3 or Examiner.
Questions utilizing such material shall require understanding of the information
contained therein rather than merely finding its location.) covering the requirements
and use of the specifications, codes, equipment, operating procedures and test
techniques the candidate may use in the performance of his/her duties with the
employer. A minimum of 8 questions shall be administered for the specific examination
for Level 1-Limited. A minimum of 30 questions shall be administered for the specific
examination at Levels 1, 2, and 3.
5.3.13 Practical Examination Test Samples
Is there evidence that test samples used for the practical examination contain known
discontinuities or conditions?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance:


a) The test samples shall be representative of the products to be encountered by the
candidate in the performance of his/her duties with the employer. When only one
configuration of hardware is to be inspected upon certification, both test samples may
be of the same configuration.
b) A test sample is a part or image containing one or more known and documented
natural or artificial discontinuities, flaws or conditions used in the practical examination
to demonstrate the candidate's proficiency in an NDT method. Test samples can refer
to actual hardware, fabricated test parts, or, when applicable, images of actual
hardware such as radiographs.
5.3.14 Level 1 Practical Examinations
Do the Level 1 practical examinations provide evidence that at least one test sample
per technique, with a minimum of two test configurations for each method, were
processed?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance:


a) Technique is defined by the Level 3 in the suppliers written practice.
b) When only one configuration of hardware is to be inspected upon certification, both
test samples may be of the same configuration.
c) The candidate shall document the NDT results. The checklist shall address
proficiency in the use and standardization of the equipment and materials, adherence
to procedural details and the documentation of the results.
d) If the Level 1 candidate is to accept products, the checklist shall also include
proficiency in the interpretation and evaluation of indications. All practical examinations
shall be administered by the Responsible Level 3 or Examiner.

5.3.15 Level 2 Practical Examinations


Do the Level 2 practical examinations provide evidence that at least one test sample
per technique, with a minimum of two test configurations for each method, were
processed?

YES NO N/A

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 15 -

Compliance Assessment Guidance:


a) Technique is defined by the Level 3 in the suppliers written practice.
b) When only one configuration of hardware is to be inspected upon certification, both
test samples may be of the same configuration.
c) The candidate shall document the NDT results in accordance with the applicable
acceptance criteria. The checklist shall address proficiency in the use and
standardization of the equipment and materials, adherence to procedural details and
the accuracy and completeness of interpretation and evaluation of indications. All
practical examinations shall be administered by the Responsible Level 3 or Examiner.
d) If a Level 2 develops work instructions, the practical examination shall include the
developing of work instructions. The examination checklist completed by the examiner
must include the ability of the candidate to develop work instructions.
5.3.16 Level 3 Practical Examinations
Does the Level 3 practical examination provide evidence that an NDT procedure or
work instruction appropriate to the employers current requirements for the method
was written?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The Level 3 practical shall require the candidate
to develop an NDT procedure or work instruction (A document detailing the NDT
technique and testing parameters to be used for the inspection of a specific
component, group of parts, e.g. aluminum extrusions or steel brackets, or assembly.
These are sometimes referred to in the industry as technique sheets or data cards.
Such work instructions are based on procedures defined in NAS410/EN4179)
appropriate to the employers requirements. This may include a procedure previously
written for the current employer but must have been developed within the previous
three (3) months by the candidate with the approval of the Responsible Level 3 or
NANDTB. A part specific data card (technique) may be adequate for the procedure
requirement provided it contains sufficiently detailed information for processing and
inspecting a part and demonstrating a Level 3 candidates practical knowledge of the
method and customer requirements. As guidance, a penetrant technique would
generally not meet this requirement. A written checklist shall be used to address the
technical and practical adequacy of the procedure. Results of all practical
examinations shall be documented with evidence as to date reviewed, signature of
reviewer and title.
5.3.17 Level 3 Proficiency Examination
If the Level 3s duties include processing and/or accepting hardware, does the
practical examination provide evidence that at least one test sample per technique (as
defined by the written practice) with a minimum of two test samples of differing
configurations for each method were evaluated?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance:


a) The practical examination shall encompass proficiency in performance of such
tasks and be demonstrated to the requirements of Level 2.
b) The additional practical examination to accept/reject hardware is not required for
Level 3s who write or approve procedures or work instructions even if those
instructions are used by personnel to accept/reject hardware. All practical
examinations shall be administered by the Responsible Level 3 or Examiner.

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 16 -

5.3.18 Written Checklists


Is there evidence that a written checklist was used to document all practical
examinations, including those administered by an outside agency or NANDTB?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: For all practical exams, a written checklist


covering the topics detailed by the appropriate standard shall be developed and
approved by the Responsible Level 3 or the NANDTB.
5.3.19 Documenting Practical Results
Does the documentation indicate the acceptance criteria and acceptance status of all
indications and/or conditions established by the Level 3 Examiner or NANDTB?

YES NO N/A

5.3.20 Access to Exams


Are controls in place that assures NDT qualification examinations are only made
available during administration of the exam?

YES NO N/A

5.3.21 Exam Security


Are examinations located in an area preventing access by those other than the
Responsible Level 3 or examiner?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Examinations shall be maintained in a secure


environment.
5.3.22 Right To Review
Does the written procedure address actions to be taken to assure all qualification
examinations, including those provided by an outside agency, are available for review
during the audit?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: When an outside agency provides the


qualification exams and maintains them, the procedure must address actions to be
taken to allow review by the customer, or TPG representative, in a timely manner.
Responsibility for making examinations available for review is solely that of the
employer.

5.4

Vision Examinations
5.4.1

Examination Records
Are visual and color perception examination results current for all certified inspection
personnel?

5.4.2

Maintenance of Exam
Are records of vision exams maintained and available for review?

5.4.3

YES NO

YES NO

Near Vision
Do the records provide evidence that the near vision examinations meet Snellen 20/25
test chart at not less than 16 inches/ 42cm (or equivalent as determined by the
Responsible Level 3) with at least one eye, either natural or corrected?

YES NO

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 17 -

Compliance Assessment Guidance: For the purpose of this checklist, Jaeger J1 at not
less than 12 inches/30cm is considered acceptable. NOTE: Documented evidence of
equivalency determination does not need to be kept on file.
5.4.4

Color Vision
Do the vision examination records indicate that the technicians can distinguish and
differentiate between the colors used in the method for which certification is sought?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Any limitations in color perception shall be


evaluated by the Responsible Level 3 prior to certification and must be approved in
writing. The employer shall ensure the flowdown of the (NAS 410/EN4179) Table V
vision requirements to all necessary personnel and/or facilities.
5.4.5

Frequency of Exams
Are near vision examinations administered prior to certification and annually thereafter
and color perception examinations given at least prior to certification or
re-certification?

5.4.6

YES NO

Vision Examination Administration


Is there evidence that trained personnel designated by the Responsible Level 3,
NANDTB or qualified medical personnel administered the vision exams?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The Responsible Level 3 shall designate the


source for administering the vision examination.
a) If medically qualified, the medical facility name is sufficient.
b) If non-medically qualified, individuals shall be identified. Designation must be
conducted prior to examinations being performed. The designation must be in writing
and may be in the form of a letter or via electronic means that specifies, by name,
those authorized to perform the vision examinations.

5.5

Review of Suppliers Level 3 Personnel


5.5.1

Internal Level 3 Assignment


Does the supplier have an internal Level 3 in all methods being audited?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The supplier may choose to utilize an on site


Level 3 for any or all NDT methods performed. All methods performed at the facility
shall be covered by a Level 3, either internal or external. This question shall be
answered as yes if a combination is used but with an explanation.

METHOD
Liquid Penetrant
Magnetic Particle
Ultrasonic
Radiography
5.5.2

NAME(s)

CERT DATE

Use of Outside Agencies

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 18 -

Are outside agencies, including corporate level 3s not stationed at this facility, used to
provide Level 3 services? Note: An N/A response must be explained in detail.

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: When permitted by the suppliers customer, an


outside agency (including Corporate Level 3s not stationed at this facility) may be
employed to develop a certification program, train and examine NDT personnel and to
perform any and all Level 3 functions. Note that, most if not all, suppliers require the
use of some external Level 3 services, if not only for qualification exams. All uses of
external Level 3 services shall be explained and documented.
NAME

5.5.3

Company

Location

SERVICES PROVIDED

Qualification / Certification Record for Outside Agents


Does the facility have documentation on file to verify the adequacy of the qualification /
certification for the outside Level 3?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: If a supplier uses external Level 3 services


(including corporate level 3s not stationed at this facility) for qualification
examinations; to approve techniques and/or procedures; to inspect hardware; or as
the Responsible Level 3 then that Level 3 shall be qualified and certified to NAS410
/EN4179. The NDT Task Group requires that the supplier who utilizes the Level 3s
services shall have proof, on file, of this certification. Proof of certification in this
sense is evidence of certification in accordance with NAS 410 / EN4179, the supplier
is not required to maintain copies of the Level 3s examinations. External sources who
provide only training services are not required to prove certification only proof of
adequate background experience. Proof of Background Experience in this sense is
documentation that justifies the suitability of the outside source. Documentation may
be in the form of a resume citing qualifications, evidence of certifications held or
previous industry-related work experience that proves the candidates suitability as a
trainer.

Name

5.6

Method

Cert Date

Training Course Outline


5.6.1

Training Course Outline Availability


Are training course outlines for NDT personnel in place, including those used by an
outside agency?

5.6.2

YES NO

Training Sufficiency
Is the training subject matter sufficient enough to ensure that NDT personnel at all

YES NO

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 19 -

levels (excluding Level 3) become proficient with the principles and practices of the
applicable test method and technique(s)?
5.6.3

Training Course Outline Approval


Are the training course outlines approved by the Responsible Level 3 or NANDTB, as
applicable?
Compliance Assessment Guidance: This includes those training course outlines used
by an outside agency. If an outside agency or NANDTB is used to provide the training,
the Responsible Level 3 shall verify that the training meets the employers
requirements.

5.6.4

Basic Theory
Do the training course outlines address the basic theory for each method?

5.6.5

YES NO

Process Controls
Do the training courses outline address, for each method, the applicable process
controls?

5.6.9

YES NO

Equipment
Do the training courses outline address, for each method, equipment operation and
standardization?

5.6.8

YES NO

Product Knowledge
Do the training course outlines address product forms and materials; defect formation
and characterization?

5.6.7

YES NO

Test Principles
Do the training course outlines address the test principles, including choice of NDT
methods, relevance to different materials, and part and test variables?

5.6.6

YES NO

YES NO

NDT Process and Parameters


Do the training courses outline address, for each method, the applicable NDT
processing steps and parameters?

YES NO

5.6.10 Safety
Does the training course outline address, for each method, safety related training
requirements as determined by the supplier?

YES NO

5.6.11 NDT Techniques


Do the training course outlines address the advantages and disadvantages of each
NDT technique used?

YES NO

5.6.12 Limitations and Capabilities


Do the training course outlines address the limitations and capabilities of each NDT

YES NO

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 20 -

method and technique used?


5.6.13 NDT Inspection Criteria
Do the training course outlines address the applicable specifications, codes, operating
procedures and work instructions used?

YES NO

5.6.14 Product Evaluation Process


Do the training course outlines address the evaluation and interpretation processes
and documentation of the inspection results?

YES NO

5.6.15 Training Hours


Do the training course outlines address the amount of time to be spent on each
subject area?

YES NO

5.6.16 Instructor Approval


Have instructors been designated or approved by the Responsible Level 3 or
NANDTB?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Instructors shall have the skills and knowledge to
plan, organize, and present classroom training and practical exercises in accordance
with approved course outlines.
5.6.17 Training References
Do the training course outlines include a list of references from which the training
material is derived?

YES NO

NDT Qualification / certification ASNTs SNT-TC-1A

N/A

Note: Reference The American Society for Nondestructive Testings (ASNT) Recommended Practice
SNT-TC-1A for detailed requirements.

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

6.1

TPG-AC7114

- 21 -

Written Practice
The written practice shall address, or identify, the following as a minimum:
Compliance Assessment Guidance: The expectation is that each item required by section 6.1
be addressed in detail in the suppliers written practice. It is not adequate to merely reference
ASNTs SNT-TC-1A for these items. Although it is recognized that the SNT-TC-1A document
provides Guidelines for the Training, Qualification, and Certification of NDT Personnel, and
that the employer may modify them as necessary to meet their specific needs, these
guidelines including training hours, number of examination questions, and extent of
experience become mandatory requirements whenever the document is specified
contractually.
6.1.1

Written Practice
Has the supplier established a written practice for the control and administration of
NDT personnel training, examination, and certification?

6.1.2

Written Practice Approval


Is the training, qualification and certification of NDT personnel written practice
reviewed and approved by the employers NDT Level 3?

6.1.3

YES NO

Examination Requirements
Does the written practice address the examination requirements for each level of
certification?

6.1.8

YES NO

Experience Requirements
Does the written practice address the experience requirements for each level of
certification?

6.1.7

YES NO

Training Program
Does the written practice address the training requirements for each level of
certification?

6.1.6

YES NO

Personnel Duties and Responsibilities


Does the written practice describe the responsibilities for each level of certification for
determining the acceptability of materials or components in accordance with
applicable codes, standards, specifications, and procedures?

6.1.5

YES NO

Levels of Qualification
Does the written practice address the applicable levels of qualification used by the
supplier?

6.1.4

YES NO

YES NO

Records
Does the written practice address the required records to be maintained?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Personnel records shall be maintained on file by


the employer for the duration specified in the employers written practice.
PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114
6.1.9

- 22 -

Reinstatement of Certification
Does the written practice address the following:
6.1.9.1

Interrupted Service?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The written practice shall include the


rules covering the types and duration of interrupted service that may require
reexamination and recertification. In addition, it shall specify the
requirements for reexamination and recertification for the interrupted
service.
6.1.9.2

Recertification?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The written practice shall state if


evidence of continuing satisfactory technical performance and/or
reexaminations are required for recertification as deemed necessary by the
employers NDT Level 3. Also, the written practice shall specify the
maximum recertification interval.
6.1.9.3

Termination of certification?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The employers certification shall be


deemed revoked when employment is terminated. The written practice shall
provide the conditions needed to be met by the candidate for certification to
their former NDT level.
6.1.9.4

Reinstatement of certification?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The written practice shall specify the


conditions under which certifications may be reinstated to the former NDT
level without new examinations.
6.1.10 Additional Training
Does the written practice address the requirements to wait at least thirty (30) days or
received suitable additional training of personnel that fail the certification/recertification examinations?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Candidates failing to attain the required grades


shall wait at least thirty (30) days or receive suitable additional training as determined
by the employers NDT Level 3 before reexamination.
6.1.11 Re-examinations
Does the written practice address the requirements for re-examination of those
personnel who have failed their certification/re-certification examinations or have had
their certifications revoked?

YES NO

6.1.12 Certification and Recertification Requirements


Does the written practice address the certification and recertification requirements?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: All levels may be recertified by providing evidence


PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 23 -

of continuing satisfactory technical performance or by reexaminations as deemed


necessary by the employers NDT Level 3.

6.1.13 Training Outlines


Does the written practice reference or include the NDT training outlines used by the
employer?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Recommended NDT training course outlines and


references which may be used as technical source material, are contained in
ANSI/ASNT CP-105 - Topical Outlines for Qualification of NDT Personnel.
6.1.14 Administration
Does the written practice include the identification of the individual(s) or the outside
agency responsible for administering and maintaining all or part of the employer's
certification program?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: An NDT Level 3 shall be responsible for the


administration and grading of NDT qualification examinations. The administration and
grading may be delegated to a qualified representative of the NDT Level 3 and so
recorded. A qualified representative of the employer may perform the actual
administration and grading of Level 3 examinations (Basic, Method and Specific
examinations). Note: Practical examinations for Level 3s are not specified in ASNTs
SNT-TC-1A.

6.2

Personnel Records
6.2.1

Certification Records
Are all required records of training, qualification and certification of NDT personnel
maintained and made available for review?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Personnel records shall be maintained on file by


the employer for the duration specified in the employers written practice.
6.2.2

Name of Certified Individuals


Do the records indicate the name of the certified individual?

6.2.3

Scope of Certification
Do the records indicate the level, and NDT method for which the individual is certified?

6.2.4

YES NO

YES NO

Educational Background and Experience


Do records indicate the educational background and experience of certified
individuals?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: When used to meet qualification requirements, do


PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 24 -

records indicate the extent of and provide documentation of formal education?


6.2.5

Statement of Training
Do the records provide a statement indicating satisfactory completion of training in
accordance with the employers written practice?

6.2.6

YES NO

Results of Vision Examinations


Are the results of vision examinations for the current certification period on file?

YES NO

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

6.2.7

- 25 -

Examinations
Are current examination copy(ies) or evidence of successful completion of
examinations included in the records?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The facility shall maintain the results of all
qualification examinations. A copy of the latest examinations shall be made available
for review during the audit. Documentation shall be adequate to ascertain all pertinent
facts surrounding the exams.
6.2.8

Examination Waiver
Is there suitable evidence of satisfactory qualifications available when such
qualifications are used in lieu of the specific examinations?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance:


Level 1 & 2 personnel holding a valid endorsed ACCP Level 2 Certificate in the
applicable method:
May have the general examination waived.

The specific examination may be deleted by the employer if documented


experience exists to permit such.

The practical examination may be waived if the Inspector has completed an


ACCP Level 2 general hands on practical examination.

Level 3 personnel holding a valid endorsed ASNT or ACCP Level 3 Certificate in the
applicable method:
May have the basic and method examination waived.
The specific examination may be deleted by the employer if documented evidence of
experience exists, including the preparation of NDT procedures to codes, standards,
or specifications and the evaluation of test results.

6.2.9

Composite Grades
Do the records include the composite grades or suitable evidence of grades?

YES NO

6.2.10 Signature of Level 3


Do the records include the signature of the NDT Level 3 that verified the qualifications
of the candidates for certification?

YES NO

6.2.11 Dates of Certification


Do the records indicate the dates of certification and/or re-certification and the dates
of assignment to NDT?

YES NO

6.2.12 Certification Expiration Dates


PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114
Do the records indicate the certification expiration dates?

- 26 YES NO

6.2.13 Signature of Certifying Authority


Do the records indicate the signature of the employers certifying authority?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The employers certifying authority does not have
to be an NDT certified individual but shall be an employee of the company granting the
NDT certification. Note: Outside agencies cannot certify for employers.

6.3

Examinations
6.3.1

Administration and Grading


Is there evidence that the qualification examinations have been administered and
graded by the NDT Level 3 or by a qualified representative of the employer (for Level
3s)?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: An NDT Level 3 shall be responsible for the


administration and grading of NDT qualification examinations. A qualified
representative of the employer may perform the actual administration and grading of
Level 3 examinations (Basic, Method and Specific examinations).

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

6.3.2

- 27 -

Examination Delegation
If the Level 3 delegates the administration of examinations, was the delegation
recorded?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The administration and grading of NDT


qualification examinations may be delegated to a qualified representative of the NDT
Level 3 and so recorded. A qualified representative of the employer may perform the
actual administration and grading of Level 3 examinations (Basic, Method, Specific &
Practical examinations).
6.3.3

Administration Limits
Does evidence exist that qualification exams have not been administered by a
subordinate or to ones self?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: In no case can an examination be administered


by one's self or by a subordinate.
6.3.4

Exam Schedule for Level 1 and Level 2


Are the Level 1 and Level 2 personnel re-certified at a frequency not to exceed five
years?

6.3.5

Exam Schedule for Level 3


Are Level 3 personnel re-certified at a frequency not to exceed five years?

6.3.6

YES NO N/A

Re-certification Examinations
Are Level 1, and Level 2 re-certified by evidence of continuing satisfactory technical
performance or by re-examination in those portions deemed necessary by the
employers NDT Level 3?

6.3.8

YES NO N/A

Level 3 Re-certification
Is the Level 3 re-certified by evidence of continuing satisfactory technical performance
or by re-examination in those portions deemed necessary by the employers NDT
Level 3?

6.3.7

YES NO N/A

YES NO N/A

Examination Scoring System


Does the examination scoring system for qualification examinations conform to the
requirements of SNT-TC-1A and the employers written practice?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: For Level 1 and Level 2 a composite grade shall
be determined by simple averaging of the results of the general, specific and practical
examinations. For Level 3 personnel, the composite grade shall be determined by
simple averaging of the results of the basic, method and specific examinations. Scores
for ASNT examinations or outside agencies reported as pass may be assigned a
value of 80%. Examinations shall result in a passing composite grade of at least 80%,
with no individual examination having a passing grade less than 70%.

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

6.3.9

- 28 -

General Examination - Level 1 and Level 2


Do the Level 1 and Level 2 general examinations have the minimum number of
questions as referenced in the written practice and does the question content cover
the subject material for the level and NDT method for which certification is sought?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The general examination for all levels shall be a
closed book examination covering the cross-section of the applicable NDT method at
the appropriate level. The minimum number of questions shall be as specified in SNTTC-1A-2006. A valid endorsement on an ACCP Level 2 certificate fulfills the general
examination criteria for each applicable NDT method.
6.3.10 Specific Examination Questions - All Levels
Do the examinations have, at least, the minimum number of questions and do the
specific examination questions reflect the equipment, operating procedures, and NDT
techniques that the individual may encounter during specific assignments to the
degree required by the employers written practice? In addition, do the specific
examinations cover the specifications or codes and acceptance criteria used in the
employers NDT procedures. Do the Level 3 specific examinations contain in addition
to the above, questions pertaining to the administration of the employers written
practice?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The specific examination for all levels shall be a
closed book examination (except that necessary data, such as graphs, tables,
specifications, procedures, codes, etc., may be provided with or in the examination).
Questions utilizing such material shall require an understanding of the information
rather than merely locating the appropriate answer. All questions used for Level 1 and
Level 2 examinations shall be approved by the responsible Level 3.
For Level 2, the employer may delete the specific examination if the candidate has a
valid ACCP Level 2 certificate in the method and if documented experience exists to
permit such.
For Level 3, the employer may delete the specific examination if the candidate has a
valid ASNT NDT Level 3 certificate or ACCP Professional Level 3 certificate in the
method and if documented evidence of experience exists, including the preparation of
NDT procedures to codes, standards, or specifications and the evaluation of test
results.
6.3.11 Basic Examination - Level 3
Does the Level 3 Basic examination have the minimum number of questions as
specified in SNT-TC-1A-2006?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The Level 3 Basic examination is required only


once when more than one NDT method examination is taken. A valid endorsement on
an ASNT NDT Level 3 certificate or an ACCP Professional Level 3 certificate fulfills
the Basic examination criteria for each applicable NDT method.
6.3.12 Method Examination - Level 3
Does the Level 3 method examination have the minimum number of questions as
specified in SNT-TC-1A-2006?

YES NO N/A

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 29 -

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The Level 3 method examination is required for


each NDT method for which the candidate will be certified. A valid endorsement on an
ASNT NDT Level 3 certificate or an ACCP Professional Level 3 certificate fulfills the
method examination criteria for each applicable NDT method.
6.3.13 Level 1 Practical Examinations
Do the Level 1 practical examinations provide evidence that at least one flawed
specimen or component was tested and the results of the NDT analyzed by the
candidate?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The description of the test specimen, the NDT
procedure, including check points, and the results of the examination shall be
documented. Proficiency shall be demonstrated in performing the applicable NDT on
one or more specimens or machine problems approved by the NDT Level 3 and in
evaluating the results to the degree of responsibility as described in the employers
written practice.
6.3.14 Level 2 Practical Examinations
Do the Level 2 practical examinations provide evidence that at least one flawed
specimen or component was tested and the results of the NDT analyzed by the
candidate?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The description of the test specimen, the NDT
procedure, including check points, and the results of the examination shall be
documented. Proficiency shall be demonstrated in selecting and performing the
applicable NDT technique within the method and interpreting and evaluating the
results on one or more specimens or machine problems approved by the NDT Level 3.
6.3.15 Written Checklists
Is there evidence that a written checklist was used to document all practical
examinations, including those administered by an outside agency?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: At least ten (10) different check points requiring
understanding of test variables and the employers procedural requirements shall be
included in the practical examination checklist.

6.4

Vision Examinations
6.4.1

Examination Records
Are visual and color perception examination results current for all certified inspection
personnel?

6.4.2

Maintenance of Exam
Are records of vision exams maintained and available for review?

6.4.3

YES NO

YES NO

Near Vision
Do the records provide evidence that natural or corrected near-distance acuity in at

YES NO

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 30 -

least one eye such that the applicant is capable of reading a minimum of Jaeger
Number 2 or equivalent type and size letter at the distance designated on the chart but
not less than 12 inches (30.5 cm) on a standard Jaeger test chart?
Compliance Assessment Guidance: The ability to perceive an Ortho-Rater minimum of
8 or similar test pattern is also acceptable.

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

6.4.4

- 31 -

Color Contrast Differentiation


Do the color contrast differentiation examinations demonstrate the capability of
distinguishing and differentiating contrast among colors or shades of gray used in the
method as determined by the employer?

6.4.5

Frequency of Exams
Are near vision examinations administered annually, and contrast differentiation
examinations conducted upon initial certification and at five (5) year intervals
thereafter?

6.5

YES NO

YES NO

Review of Suppliers Level 3 Personnel


6.5.1

Internal Level 3 Assignment


Does the supplier have an internal Level 3 in all methods being audited?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The supplier may choose to utilize an onsite Level
3 for any or all NDT methods performed. All methods performed at the facility shall be
covered by a Level 3, either internal or external. This question shall be answered as
yes if a combination is used but with an explanation.
METHOD
Liquid Penetrant
Magnetic Particle
Ultrasonic
Radiography
6.5.2

NAME(s)

CERT DATE

Use of Outside Agencies


Are outside agencies, including corporate Level 3s not stationed at this facility, used
to provide Level 3 services? Note: An N/A response must be explained in detail

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: When permitted by the suppliers customer, an


outside agency (including Corporate Level 3s not stationed at this facility) may be
employed to develop a certification program, train and examine NDT personnel and to
perform any and all Level 3 functions. Note that, most if not all, suppliers require the
use of some external Level 3 services, if not only for qualification exams. All uses of
external Level 3 services shall be explained and documented.
NAME

6.5.3

Company

Location

SERVICES PROVIDED

Qualification / Certification Record for Outside Agents


Does the facility have documentation on file to verify the adequacy of the qualification /
certification for the outside Level 3?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: If a supplier uses external Level 3 services


PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 32 -

(including corporate Level 3s not stationed at this facility) for qualification


examinations; to approve techniques and/or procedures; to inspect hardware; or as
the NDT Level 3 then that Level 3 shall be qualified and certified in accordance with
the employers written practice. It is required that the supplier who utilizes the Level
3s services shall have proof, on file, of this certification. Proof of certification in this
sense is evidence of certification in accordance with employers written practice.
External sources who provide only training services are not required to prove
certification only proof of adequate background experience. Proof of Background
Experience in this sense is documentation that justifies the suitability of the outside
source. Documentation may be in the form of a resume citing qualifications, evidence
of certifications held or previous industry-related work experience that proves the
candidates suitability as a trainer.
Name

6.6

Method

Cert Date

Training Course Outline


6.6.1

Training Course Outline Availability


Are training course outlines for NDT personnel in place, including those used by an
outside agency?

6.6.2

Training Sufficiency
Is the training subject matter sufficient enough to ensure that NDT personnel at all
levels (excluding Level 3) become proficient with the principles and practices of the
applicable test method and technique(s)?

6.6.3

YES NO

YES NO

Training Course Outline Approval


Are the training course outlines approved by the employers NDT Level 3?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: This includes those training course outlines used
by an outside agency. If an outside agency used to provide the training, the
employers NDT Responsible Level 3 shall verify that the training meets the
employers requirements.
6.6.4

Basic Theory
Do the training course outlines address the basic theory for each method?

6.6.5

Test Principles
Do the training course outlines address the test principles, including choice of NDT
methods, relevance to different materials, and part and test variables?

6.6.6

YES NO

YES NO

Product Knowledge
Do the training course outlines address product forms and materials; defect formation
and characterization?

YES NO

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114
6.6.7

Equipment
Do the training courses outline address, for each method, equipment operation and
standardization?

6.6.8

YES NO

Process Controls
Do the training courses outline address, for each method, the applicable process
controls?

6.6.9

- 33 -

YES NO

NDT Process and Parameters


Do the training courses outline address, for each method, the applicable NDT
processing steps and parameters?

YES NO

6.6.10 Safety
Does the training course outline address, for each method, safety related training
requirements as determined by the supplier?

YES NO

6.6.11 NDT Techniques


Do the training course outlines address the advantages and disadvantages of each
NDT technique used?

YES NO

6.6.12 Limitations and Capabilities


Do the training course outlines address the limitations and capabilities of each NDT
method and technique used?

YES NO

6.6.13 NDT Inspection Criteria


Do the training course outlines address the applicable specifications, codes, operating
procedures and work instructions used?

YES NO

6.6.14 Product Evaluation Process


Do the training course outlines address the evaluation and interpretation processes
and documentation of the inspection results?

YES NO

6.6.15 Training Hours


Do the training course outlines address the amount of time to be spent on each
subject area?

YES NO

6.6.16 Instructor Approval


Have instructors been designated or approved by the employers NDT Level 3?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Instructors shall have the skills and knowledge to
plan, organize, and present classroom training and practical exercises in accordance
with approved course outlines.
6.6.17 Training References
Do the training course outlines include a list of references from which the training
material is derived?

YES NO

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI
7

TPG-AC7114

- 34 -

PERSONNEL
The supplier shall complete and the auditor shall review, the employers provided list of
NDT personnel for adequacy, content and correctness. This list shall include trainees
and suspended personnel. Attachments are for information only but shall be
completed fully. NCRs shall not be written against attachments. Supplier may use
Attachment TPG-AC7114 or a similar format which contains the same information.

INSPECTION / RECORDS / PROCEDURES

8.1

Evidence of Unauthorized Changes


8.1.1

Procedure
Is there a procedure that addresses how changes are to be made and who is
authorized to make changes?

8.1.2

Attachment

YES NO

Records / Procedures
Were all record and/or procedure changes properly authorized?

YES NO N/A

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The auditor is expected to review substantial


documentation to make this determination.
8.1.3

Authorized List
Does the supplier maintain a list of authorized personnel?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Authorized personnel may be expressed


generically in the terms of job title, e.g., Quality Engineer.

8.2

Inspection Records
8.2.1

Record Maintenance
Is an inspection record maintained of all parts submitted for NDT inspection and
evaluation?

8.2.2

Inspection Date
Do inspection records contain or provide traceability to the date of Inspection?

8.2.3

YES NO

Traceability to Part or Material Being Inspected


Do inspection records contain or provide traceability to the part number or material?

8.2.5

YES NO

Supplier or facility
Do inspection records contain or provide traceability to the name of the Supplier or
facility that carried out the inspection?

8.2.4

YES NO

YES NO

Serial Numbers
Do inspection records contain or provide traceability to the serial number, if
applicable?

YES NO N/A

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114
8.2.6

Inspection Quantities
Do inspection records contain or provide traceability to the number of parts in the lot,
the number inspected, and the number accepted or rejected?

8.2.7

YES NO

Nature of Discrepancy
Do inspection records contain or provide traceability to the nature of the discrepancy
and, if applicable, the rejection tag number?

8.3

YES NO

Traceability to Inspector
Do inspection records contain or provide traceability to the identification of the
inspector performing the inspection?

8.2.9

YES NO

Specification References
Do inspection records contain or provide traceability to the applicable process
specification and acceptance criteria specification and revision?

8.2.8

- 35 -

YES NO

Work Orders / Shop Travelers


8.3.1

Traceability to Purchase Order


Is a work order or shop traveler in use that contains, or provides traceability to, the
product identification traceable to the applicable purchase order number, part number,
or product specification?

8.3.2

Traceability to Specifications
Is a work order or shop traveler in use that contains or provides traceability to the
applicable process specification and/or procedure?

8.3.3

YES NO

Inspection Quantities
Is a work order or shop traveler in use that contains or provides traceability to the
quantity inspected, accepted / rejected?

8.3.6

YES NO

Traceability to Inspector
Is a work order or shop traveler in use that contains, or provides traceability to the
inspector performing the operation?

8.3.5

YES NO

Traceability to Inspection Method


Is a work order or shop traveler in use that contains or provides traceability to the
inspection method?

8.3.4

YES NO

YES NO

Sequence of Operations
Is a work order or shop traveler in use that contains or provides traceability to the
correct sequence of the inspection operation(s) within the manufacturing process?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: For independent inspection facilities only the


PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 36 -

sequence within the inspection process is applicable.

CALIBRATION

9.1

Procedure
9.1.1

Flow Down
Is there a procedure that flows down calibration requirements for NDT related
equipment?

9.1.2

Accuracy / Range
Does the procedure specify the number of points to be checked for each instrument
and reference to the accuracy required and the range to be checked?

9.1.3

YES NO

Calibration Services
Do purchase orders or procedures for calibration services identify or provide
traceability to requirements for the standard to be used, accuracy, range of use and
number of points to be checked encompassing that range?

9.2

YES NO

YES NO

Calibration Certificate
9.2.1

Accuracy / Range
Do calibration certificates contain or provide traceability to the unit under test, identify
the accuracy, nomenclature and/or serial number of the unit, the range, the points in
the range of use that were checked and results?

9.2.2

YES NO

Certification Review
Is there evidence that calibration certificates are reviewed to verify equipment was
within tolerance?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: Calibration certificates shall be reviewed upon


receipt to assure accuracy of data and verify all equipment was within tolerance when
checked by the calibration source.

9.3

Extension of Calibration
9.3.1

Extension Procedure
Does the calibration procedure address criteria to either extend or reduce the
calibration frequency, if allowed by the governing specification?

YES NO

Compliance Assessment Guidance: The procedure must define what is considered as


acceptable justification, i.e., number of acceptable calibrations required before
extension is possible; the deviation needed before reduction in frequency is called for,
etc.
9.3.2

Documentation
If calibration frequencies have been extended, is adequate documentation on file to

YES NO N/A

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

PRI

TPG-AC7114

- 37 -

substantiate the extension?

10

PROCESS CONTROL FAILURE

10.1

Failure Procedure
10.1.1 Actions Taken
Is there a procedure that addresses the actions to be taken if unacceptable results are
obtained for process control tests?

YES NO

10.1.2 Customer Notification


Does the procedure address the requirements for customer notification when product
impact is suspected?

YES NO

PRI operating procedures provide that "This report is published by PRI to advance the state of technical, engineering, and quality
sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent
infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user."
PRI invites your written comments and suggestions.
Copyright 2011 Performance Review Institute. All rights reserved.
t-frm-15

01-Jan-11

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen