Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
REAL ESTATE
An Introduction
The term real estate is defined as land, including the air above it
and the ground below it, and any buildings or structures on it. It is
also referred to as realty. It covers residential housing, commercial
offices, trading spaces such as theatres, hotels and restaurants,
retail outlets, industrial buildings such as factories and
government buildings. Real estate involves the purchase, sale, and
development of land, residential and non-residential buildings.
The main players in the real estate market are the landlords,
developers, builders, real estate agents, tenants, buyers etc. The
activities of the real estate sector encompass the housing and
construction sectors also.
The real estate sector in India has assumed growing importance
with the liberalization of the economy. The consequent increase in
business opportunities and migration of the labor force has, in
turn, increased the demand for commercial and housing space,
especially rental housing. Developments in the real estate sector
are being influenced by the developments in the retail, hospitality
and entertainment (e.g., hotels, resorts, cinema theatres)
industries, economic services (e.g., hospitals, schools) and
information technology (IT)- enabled services (like call centers)
etc. and vice versa.
Rural infrastructure,
The LARR Act 2013 requires that the consent of 80% of land owners
is obtained for private projects and that the consent of 70% of land
owners be obtained for PPP projects. The Ordinance exempts the five
categories mentioned above from this provision of the Act.
In addition, the Ordinance permits the government to exempt projects
in these five categories from the following provisions, through a
notification:
The LARR Act 2013 requires that a Social Impact Assessment be
conducted to identify affected families and calculate the social impact
when land is acquired.
The LARR Act 2013 imposes certain restrictions on the acquisition of
irrigated multi-cropped land and other agricultural land. For example,
irrigated multi-cropped land cannot be acquired beyond a limit
specified by the government.
Return of unutilised land: The LARR Act 2013 required that if land
acquired under it remained unutilised for five years, it was returned to
the original owners or the land bank. The Ordinance states that the
period after which unutilised land will need to be returned will be five
years, or any period specified at the time of setting up the project,
whichever is later.
Time period for retrospective application: The LARR Act 2013 states
that the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 will continue to apply in certain
cases, where an award has been made under the 1894 Act. However,
if such as award was made five year or more before the enactment of
the LARR Act 2013, and the physical possession of land has not been
taken orcompensation has not been paid, the LARR Act 2013 will
apply.
The Ordinance states that in calculating this time period, any period
during which the proceedings of acquisition were held up: (i) due to a
stay order of a court, or (ii) a period specified in the award of a
Tribunal for taking possession, or (iii) any period where possession
has been taken but the compensation is lying deposited in a court or
any account, will not be counted.
Other changes:
The LARR Act 2013 excluded the acquisition of land for private
hospitals and private educational institutions from its purview. The
ABATEMENT
ALLOWED
TAXABLE
COMPONENT
NORMAL
RATE OF
SERVICE TAX
FLAT SIZE
OVER 2000 sq
ft.
(carpet area)
Sale price of flat
over Rs 1 crore
In all other cases
except
specifically
exempted (As
mentioned
above)
70%
30%
14%
EFFECTIVE
RATE OF
SERVICE TAX
ON PROPRTY
4.20%
70%
30%
14%
4.20%
75%
25%
14%
3.50%
contact
landowner,
farmers etc.
conduct
market
studies to
assess the
demand for
end users
P1:
Feasibility
study
land plan
estimates
the land
development
cost, and
profitability
NDA
P2:
land
acquisition
P3:
P3: land
development
subdivides
individual
sites, and
sells
smallersites
to builders
and project
developers.
retain some
retail sites for
later sale
these
builders and
developers
develop
residential or
commercial
buildingsas
the
governing
rules
sold to end
users
sold to
investors
1894
2013
2014
Social impact
assessment
(SIA)
No Provision
No provision
No provision
Consent of 80% of
displaced people
required in case of
acquisition for private
companies and publicprivate partnerships.
Only in extreme
circumstances, where
multi-cropped land has
to be acquired at any
cost, only 5% of the
total multi cropped land
in the district can be
acquired and not more.
Check the land title: many a times dispute over the property arises only because
of the land title
Once all the initial checks are made and the land to be bought is properly examined and the negotiation of the
price is done, comes the process of actually buying the land.
The first step of actually buying the land is to draft an agreement between the parties involved in the transaction.
An agreement is made to make sure that none of the parties involved in the transaction change their mind and go
back on what has been decided about the transaction.
Year
Policy announcements
2000
2001
2003
2005
2008
2011
2014
2005 2008
Office net absorption 114mn
sq ft
PE investment - ~USD 9
Billion
IT, Commercial office share -~
USD 3 billion
Residential share -~ USD 2.2
Billion
2011-2013
Office net absorption 91 mn
sq ft.
PE investment -~ USD 4
billion
IT, commercial office share -~
USD 1 billion
Residential share -~ USD 2
billion
Area requirement for 100% FDI Systematic and regulatory changes on
in construction development
the anvil to create a suitable
projects reduced to 20,000 sqm investment climate.
Minimum capitalization
reduced to USD 5 million
REIT guidelines and rules
Framed by securities and
exchange board of India (SEBI)
(i) without consideration, the stamp duty value of which exceeds fifty thousand rupees,
the stamp duty value of such property;
(ii)
for a consideration which is less than the stamp duty value of the property
by an amount exceeding fifty thousand rupees, the stamp duty value of such property
as exceeds such consideration:
Provided that where the date of the agreement fixing the amount of consideration for
the transfer of immovable property and the date of registration are not the same, the
stamp duty value on the date of the agreement may be taken for the purposes of this
sub-clause:
Provided further that the said proviso shall apply only in a case where the amount of
consideration referred to therein, or a part thereof, has been paid by any mode other
than cash on or before the date of the agreement for the transfer of such immovable
property"
Salient features of Section 56(2)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
1)
2)
The stamp duty value of immovable property should be more then Rs.50,000/- if
property is transferred without any consideration.
3)
The difference in stamp duty value and consideration amount received should
be less then Rs.50,000/- if the immovable property is transferred without
inadequate consideration.
4)
5)
6)
If the consideration amount has been paid by mode other than cash either
or fully in the year of agreement prior to the year in which the registration
property is done, the stamp value of the property of the year in
agreement to sell was executed shall be treated as deemed consideration
year of registration for the purpose of Income Tax.
partly
of the
which
in the
4) Controversial Issue
5)
6) A controversy has arisen in respect of applicability of year of this section.
Whether this section applies in the year when agreement to sale was made and
possession has been given or when the conveyance was registered. Let us take an
example.
7)
8) A has sold a flat to B in Financial Year 2010 2011 for a consideration of
Rs.50 lakhs. An Agreement to Sale was made between A and B. The possession of
the flat was given by A to B during the financial year 2011 2012. The sale deed was
executed in June 2013 and stamp duty was paid at a value of Rs.75 Lakh by the buyer.
A has already booked the sale in its accounts in the year 2011 2012 and have filed
its return of income and have paid tax there on. Now the question arises that after
insertion of section 43CA is A liable to pay further tax on difference between
consideration amount and stamp duty value as sale deed was executed in the current
financial year?
9)
10) Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 applies when the immovable property
is transferred. In the Income Tax Act, transfer in relation to capital assets has been
defined in section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In case of trading assets, the
Act is silent and therefore, we will have to look in to the Transfer of property Act,
1882. Section 5 of the Transfer of Property Act deals with Transfer of immovable
Property. The said section is reproduced below
11)
12) Transfer of Property means an act by which a living person conveys property,
in present or in future, to one or more other living persons, or to himself and one or
more other living persons; and to transfer property is to perform such act.
13)
14) In this section living person includes a Company or Association or Body of
Individuals, whether incorporated or not, but nothing herein contained shall affect
any law for the time being in force relating to transfer of property to or by
Companies, Associations or Bodies of Individuals.
15)
16) Hence, transfer of property takes place only when it is conveyed. Section 53A
of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 is not applicable in case of section 43CA of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 because it relates to capital assets as per provision of section
2(47) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Delivery of possession of immovable property
cannot by itself be treated as equivalent to conveyance of immovable property as
held by the Honble Apex Court in the case of Alapati Venkataramiah Vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad reported in 57 ITR 185. Until and
unless the title of the property is passed to the purchaser, there cannot be a sale
or transfer of immovable property. Reliance can also be placed in deuces ion By:
ITAT, Bench `A, Chennai, in the case of R.Gopinath (HUF) v. ACIT, Appeal No:
ITA Nos. 29 & 30/Mds/2008, decided on July 24, 2009.
17)
18) As per provision of section 5 of Transfer of Property Act 1882, and also as per the
above decisions, in my view in the above mentioned example, A will have to pay more
tax on the difference in value of stamp duty and consideration amount as per
provision of section 43CA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2014
2015.
19)
20)
21)
Development Agreements
22) In case of development agreement for an immovable property, Long Term Capital
Gain may arise as per section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, if the land is
capital assets, Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in case of development
agreement at the time of possession does not apply.
23)
We must also look it to Section 50D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which has
come in to operation
24)
w.e.f 01-04-2013 only in respect of taxability of development agreement.
25)
26)
27)
29)
30) The conditions for applicability of provision are:
31)
32) Consideration must be received or accruing if consideration is not received
or accrued in the previous year, then provision will not apply. For example, if a
consideration or part of consideration shall be received or accrued in future, then the
provision will not apply. In case a developer will provide some of constructed area, to
land owner, on completion of project, then the consideration to be received in kind in
future, is not consideration received or accrued, therefore, in such cases the provision
of Section 50D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 will not be applicable.
33)
34) There must be transfer of capital asset if there is no transfer, then this section
will not apply. Here transfer of capital asset can mean a definite and absolute
transfer. A transfer of some of rights for limited purposes cannot be regarded as
transfer of capital asset in the context of tax on capital gains. There should not be a
situation of contingent transfer which can be revert back on some contingencies. The
transfer must be full and final. Readers are requested to go through definition of
transfer in relation to a capital asset provided in section 2(47) of the Income-tax
Act, 1961 and also to see exemption from meaning of transfer as provided in section
47 of the Act.
35)
36) Consideration should not be ascertainable or cannot be determined thus if
consideration can be ascertained or determined, even in future, then this provision
may not be applicable. For example, if a part of consideration will be given in kind,
say some of constructed area in a project, then the situation is one in which
consideration will be received and it will be ascertainable in future so in such
situation Section 50D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 may not be applicable depending
on facts of the case.
37)
38) This provision is only for the purpose of computing income chargeable to tax as
capital gains. This provision is not applicable in case of business income or income
falling under head other sources or income from house property etc.
39)
40) In case of Joint Development Agreements where development rights for identified
land are exchanged for a specified percentage of built up area in the project, there is
no way of determining the value of consideration at the time the development rights
are transferred. However, post the proposed amendment, the FMV of the
development rights or the built up area may be determined and the gains shall be
liable to capital gains tax. The basis which the FMV is required to be determined
has not been specified.
41)
42)
43)
44)
45)
The point where the capital gain is deemed to accrue will purely depend
on the terms of Joint
46) Development Agreement. Where the agreement is of such nature that
possession is given in part performance of a contract, the liability of capital gain tax
will arise on the handing over of such possession to the builder.
47)
48) If the possession is not transferred but deferred until the construction is
completed, the liability to capital gain tax will arise in the year in which the
developer completes the construction.
49)
50)
51)
52) If the developer is liable for the breaking down of joint development
agreement, then either the landowner will get compensation from the developer for
the breach of contract or developer have to do specific performance as per the
terms of the Joint Development Agreement, in both cases landowner will acquire.
And, for charging what landowner has acquired from the developer under capital gain
tax, it should first come under the definition of capital asset. Reliance can be placed
in CIT vs Vijay Flexible Containers [1990] 186 ITR 691 (Bom.) and K. R.
Srinath vs ACIT, [2004] 141 Taxman 268 (Mad).
53)
54)
55)
56) The Finance Bill, 2013 has introduced a new section 194-IA providing for TDS
@ 1% to be deducted by purchaser. In case valid PAN of seller is not available, tax
deduction will be at higher rate of 20%. This is applicable w.e.f. June 01, 2013 for
sale of immovable property (other than agricultural land) where consideration is Rs.
50 Lakhs and above. The purchaser is exempt from the obligation to obtain TAN, which
57)
58)
59)
60) It may be noted that the Agricultural Land has been excluded from the ambit of
this new provision, however all agricultural lands are not excluded and that the
agricultural land which is comprised within the jurisdiction of a municipality having
population between 10,000 to 1,00,000 as well as land which is not more than 2
Kilometres or has population between 1,00,000 to 10,00,000 as well as land which is
not more than 6 Kilometres or population above 10,00,000 as well as land which is not
more than 8 Kilometres of the local limits of any municipality would come within the
purview of making compliance as per the above section 194LA and thus in respect
of this category of agricultural land the formalities of TDS are required to be complied
with.
61)
62) CBDT has issued Notification No. 39/2013 on 31st May 2013 amending rules to
simplify procedure for complying with provisions of this new section.
63)
64) In exercise of the powers conferred by section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
(43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules
further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:
65)
1. (1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2013.
66)
67) (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official
Gazette.
68)
2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, (hereinafter referred to as the said rules) in rule 30,
69)
(a)after sub-rule (2), the following sub-rule shall be inserted, namely:
(b)
(2A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1) or sub-rule (2),
any sum deducted under section 194-IA shall be paid to the credit of the Central
Government within a period of seven days from the end of the month in which the
deduction is made and shall be accompanied by a challan-cum-statement in Form
No.26QB.;
(c)
(b)
(d)
(e)
(6A) Where tax deducted is to be deposited accompanied by a challancum-statement in Form No.26QB, the amount of tax so deducted shall be
deposited to the credit of the Central Government by remitting it electronically
within the time specified in sub-rule (2A) into the Reserve Bank of India or the
State Bank of India or any authorised bank.;
(f)
(g)
(h)
(7A) The Director General of Income-tax (Systems) shall specify the
procedure, formats and standards for the purposes of remitting the amount
electronically to the Reserve Bank of India or the State Bank of India or any
authorised bank and shall be responsible for the day- to-day administration in
relation to the remitting of the amount electronically in the manner so specified.;
(i)
3. In rule 31 of the said rules,
(a)after sub-rule (3), the following sub-rule shall be inserted, namely:
(j)
(k)
(3A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1) or sub-rule (2)
or sub-rule (3), every person responsible for deduction of tax under section 194IA shall furnish the certificate of deduction of tax at source in Form No.16B to the
payee within fifteen days from the due date for furnishing the challan-cumstatement in Form No.26QB under rule 31A after generating and downloading the
same from the web portal specified by the Director General of Income-tax (System)
or the person authorised by him.;
(l)
(b)
(m)
(n)
(6A) The Director General of Income-tax (Systems) shall specify the
procedure, formats and standards for the purposes of generation and download of
certificates and shall be responsible for the day-to-day administration in relation to
the generation and download of certificates from the web portal specified by him or
the person authorised by him.;
(o)
4. In rule 31A of the said rules, after sub-rule (4), the following sub-rule shall be
inserted, namely:
(p)
(q)
(4A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1) or sub-rule (2) or
sub-rule (3) or sub rule (4), every person responsible for deduction of tax under
section 194-IA shall furnish to the Director General of Income-tax (System) or
the person authorised by the Director General of Income-tax (System) a challancum-statement in Form No.26QB electronically in accordance with the procedures,
formats and standards specified under sub-rule (5) within seven days from the end
of the month in which the deduction is made.;
(r)
5. In Appendix-II of the said rules,
(s)
(a)after Form No.16AA, the following Form shall be inserted, namely:
(b)
FORM 16B
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f) In respect of compulsory acquisition of immovable property, TDS is also required
to be made on compensation amount exceeding Rs 2,00,000/- @10% as per
provision of section 194LA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This section does not apply
in case of compensation received for agriculture land.
(g)
(h) Hardship in Let out Property
(i)
(j) Sections 43CA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and section 50C of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 create problems for genuine Assessees. If a person has a building which
is occupied by tenants, cannot fetch market price if sold. Such property can hardly
fetch 25% value of the stamp duty value. Such property owner may have to pay tax
more than consideration amount being received by him. In future, no one would be
able to sell the litigated or let out property. The Finance minister should look in to
such problems and should make the appropriate amendment to remove genuine
hardship to the immovable property owner.
(k)
(l) Hardship in claiming exemption u/s 54 or 54F
(m)
(n) In case of long term capital gain on sale of residential house, if the sale
consideration is invested in buying another residential house, no capital gain tax will
be charged as per provision of section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. But I would
like to mention one case in which in spite of availing exemption u/s 54 the Assessee
has to bear tax liability.
(o)
(p) Mr. A is owner of a residential flat. The acquisition value of said house was for
say Rs.25,00,000/- and it's index cost was Rs 50,00,000/-. X sales that flat at
Rs.73,00,000/- and buys another flat at Rs.75,00,000/- to claim exemption u/s 54F of
the Income Tax Act, 1961. The stamp duty of flat sold is Rs.85,00,000/- and stamp
duty value of the house purchased is Rs.90,00,000/-. He will have to bear tax
liability on Rs.13,00,000/- u/s 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and
Rs.15,00,000/- u/s56(2)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 plus proportionate tax
on capital gain tax for not investing entire sales consideration in new house. Even if
he does not claim any exemption he will pay much less tax. So even if the exemption
u/s 54 or 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is claimed, the Assessee may not get any
benefit due to insertion of these sections such as 50C and 56(vii).
(q)
(r) Conclusion
(s)
(t) Some of the state governments are revising value of stamp duty continuously
and also without looking at real market value in the particular locality. The market
price in a particular locality of immovable property may differ due to various factors
but the stamp duty value remains the same in a particular locality. The state
Government should not think about its own revenue but should also take other factors
(u)
(v) The assessee should be careful in selling or buying immovable properties. The
Assessee should also look in to TDS on sale of immovable property exceeding
Rs.50,00,000/-. In light of all the provisions discussed above, it reveals that all types
of Assessees are covered by the above mentioned
provisions
related
to
Real
Estate transactions
excepting
in
case
of Companies, Partnership Firm, LLP,
Trusts etc., where if an immovable property is bought, stamp duty value has no
significance and as such immovable property can be bought at a price below stamp
duty value. We hope in the next Finance Bill the Finance Minister may cover the
transfer of
(y)
(z)
(aa)
(ab)
(ac)
(ad)
(ae)
SECTIO
N
ASSESS
EE
(ah)
(ai)
Sec.54
Individu
al/
(aj)
H.U.F
(ap)
(aq)
Sec.54B
Individu
al/
(ar)
H.U.F
(af)
CONDITION
(ag)
(ao)
(ak)
(al)
(am)
EXEM
PTION
cost of
new house or
up to C.G
(an)
(as)
Agricultural land to
be transferred (same must
be used in 2 year
immediately preceding the
date of transfer for
agricultural purpose by
individual or parents.
(aw)
Cost of
new
Agricultural
Land or up to
C.G
(at)
(au)
(ax)
(ay)
Sec.54D
Any
(az)
Assesse
(bc)
(bd)
Sec.54E
C
Any
(be)
Assesse
(av)
(ba)
(bb)
Cost of
new assets or
up to C.G
(bj)
Amoun
t of
investment in
the specified
bonds or
capital gains
whichever in
lower.
3 year.
(bh)
(bi)
Maximum amount of
investment shall not exceed
50 lakhs during the year.
(bk)
(bl)
(bm)
(bn)
(bo)
(bp)
(bq)
(br)
(bs)
(bt)
(bu)
(bv)
(bw)
(bx)
(by)
(bz)
(ca)
(cb)
(cc)
(cd)
Sr.
N
o
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
owner
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
(ce)
Copy of possession letter from builder/ Developer
(cf) Any loans
(cg)
Sale agreement with the seller
(ch)
All paid tax receipts
(ci) Encumbrance certificate up to date for last 13 years
(cj) Demand letter from vendor before disbursement
(ck)
NOC from society / Building
(cl) No due certificate
(cm)
Approved Plan
(cn)
Layout approval plan
(co)
Auction sale confirmation letter from local authority
(cp)
Release Deed if any
(cq)
Completion certificate
(cr)
Occupancy certificate
(cs)
Deed of Declaration
(ct) Latest electricity bill
(cu)
(cv)
(cw)
its going to boom in the next 5 years, watch where you step.
(cx)
(cy)
(da)
(db)
(dc)
(dd)
(dp)
(dq)
(dr)
(ds)
(dt)
Due Diligence
Once the property has been identified, and a price agreed with the seller,
the buyers lawyer will conduct a due diligence or a search of all the
documents related to the property to ensure that there are no deficiencies with
the property that will hinder the proposed sale. In certain geographies, prior to
due diligence the buyer and seller may sign a letter of intent or memorandum of
understanding, accompanied by earnest money or deposit.
(du)
Title: Probably the first and most important thing the lawyer will
check is the title of the seller with respect to the property. It is essential to know
that if the seller does not have perfect title, he cannot transfer the same to the
buyer.
(dv)
For example, if the seller is not listed as the owner of the property, he
cannot sell it. Similarly, if the property is jointly owned by more than one
person, each joint owner would be required to sign the agreement to sell and
sale deed, unless any one of them is authorized to act on behalf of the others by
way of power of attorney.
(dw)
A title search is taken at the office of the local sub-registrar. The buyer
should ask for all title documents (and copies of the same) right from the first
owner of the property or, in the case of property that is extremely old, title
documents thirty years prior to the search. This process can take between 8 and
10 days. The lawyer should also ascertain the survey number, village and
registration district of the property as these details will be required for
registration.
(dx)
Encumbrances: The office of the local sub-registrar would also have to be
searched to see if there are any encumbrances on the property, such as a
mortgage, lien, or claim from a third party. Although mortgaging properties is
not an exceptional practice, one needs to consider the implications of
purchasing a mortgaged property very carefully.
(dy)
In case the seller defaults in paying his debt, the mortgagee usually a
bank can attach the property and sell it to recover the debt, despite the fact
that the mortgagor/seller no longer owns the property. Also, the mortgage deed
might contain a stipulation that the property cannot be sold unless the
mortgagee gives a no objection certificate and in the case of mortgaged
property the buyer must insist that the seller clears the mortgage obtains a NOC
from the bank. Alternatively, the buyer may contract with the seller to make
payment directly to the bank and remove the encumbrance.
(dz)
Property Tax:
(ea)
The lawyer must also check tax receipts for the past three years to
determine whether the seller has paid the requisite property tax to the housing
society or, in the case of independent houses, to the municipal authority.
(eb)
Litigation:
(ec)
It is also essential to ensure that the property is not the subject-matter of
any litigation, as cases pending before the courts can take several years, if not
decades, to be finally decided.
(ed)
Probated Will:
(ee)
In case of property that the seller has inherited, the lawyer must check the
will by way of which the property was acquired. Although Indian law does not
require a will to be probated (i.e, authenticated by a court), this is preferable as
a probate ensures legitimacy of the will and is valid against any claims
thereafter made against the sellers right to inheritance of the property. Although
approval from the RBI. However such buyers should check with their lawyers
before buying any property as they might require approvals from other
authorities such as the State Government, etc.
(fn)
To be considered a resident of India under FEMA, a foreign national
would have to satisfy two conditions: He/she must be residing in India for more
than 182 days during the preceding financial year, and His/her continued
presence in India in the current financial year must be for the purpose of taking
up employment, carrying on business or vocation in India or for any other
purpose that would indicate your intention to stay in India for an uncertain
period
(fo)
Both conditions must necessarily be fulfilled for a foreign national to be
considered a resident of India under FEMA.
(fp)
Citizens of Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, China, Iran,
Nepal, or Bhutan who are resident in India can only purchase immovable
property in India with the prior permission of the RBI, who will consider the
request in consultation with the Government of India.
(fq)
For more information, please visit http://www.rbi.org.in
(fr) Repatriation
(fs) An NRI or PIO may repatriate the proceeds from the sale of immovable
property in India on the following conditions:
(ft) The property was purchased by the NRI/PIO in accordance with the provisions
of FEMA in force at the time of the purchase
(fu)
The amount repatriated should not exceed the amount paid for the
property if the property was acquired in foreign exchange remitted through
normal banking channels or out of funds held in an FCNR (B) account
(fv) In the following circumstances, the NRI/PIO may repatriate a maximum of
USD one million per financial year:
(fw)
Out of the balances held in the NRO account if the property was
purchased out of rupee sources
(fx) If the property was acquired by way of gift, the sale proceeds must be credited
to an NRO account, and thereafter may be repatriated
(fy) If the property was inherited from a person resident in India, it may be
repatriated on production of documentary evidence proving inheritance, an
undertaking by the NRI/PIO, and a certificate by a Chartered Accountant in the
formats prescribed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes
(fz) In the case of residential property, repatriation of sale proceeds is restricted to
not more than two such properties.
(ga)
A foreign national may repatriate sale proceeds even if the property was
inherited from a person outside India. However, prior approval of the RBI must
be obtained.
(gb)
A citizen of Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, China, Afghanistan and
Iran must seek specific approval from the RBI for repatriation of sale proceeds.
(gc)
(gd)
(ge)
(gf)
(gg)
(gh)
(gi)
(gj)
(gk)
(gl)
(gm)
(gn)
(go)
(gp)
(gq)
(gr)
(gs)
(gt)
(gu)
(gv)
(gw)
(gx)
(gy)
(gz)
(ha)
(hb)
(hc)
(hd)
(he)
(hf)
The first land acquisition legislation in India was enacted by the British
government in 1824. Called the Bengal Resolution I of 1824, the law applied
to the whole of Bengal province subject to the presidency of Fort William.
The law enabled the government to obtain, at a fair valuation, land or other
immovable property required for roads, canals or other public purposes. In
1850, the British extended the regulation to Calcutta (now Kolkata), through
another legislation, the Act I of 1850, with the object of confirming the title to
lands in Calcutta for public purposes. It was also that time when the British
were building railway lines across the country, and needed some form of
legislation, which would enable them to acquire land for the same. The Act
XLII of 1850 declared that Railways were public works and thus enabled the
provisions of Resolution I of 1824 to be used for acquiring lands for the
construction of railways. Likewise, similar Acts in Bombay (now Mumbai) in
1839, the Building Act XXVII and Act XX of 1852 in Madras (now Chennai)
were passed to facilitate land acquisition in these presidencies (within the
islands of Bombay and Colaba and the Presidency of Fort St. George).
However, it was in 1857 that the British enacted legislation that applied to the
rest of the provinces or presidencies and the whole of British India. Act VI of
1857 repealed all previous enactments relating to acquisition and its object as
stated in its preamble, was to make better provision for the acquisition of land
needed for public purposes within the territories in the possession and under the
governance of The East India Company and for the determination of the amount
for the compensation to be paid for the same. This act, owing to
unsatisfactory settlement, incompetence and corruption was further
amended in 1861 (Act II) and 1863 (Act XXII) and subsequently led to the
enactment of Act X of 1870. The 1870 law, which for the first time, brought a
mechanism for settlement (the reference to a civil court for compensation, if the
collector couldnt settle by agreement), was eventually replaced by the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894 (Act I of 1894). The 1894 law did not apply to princely
states like Hyderabad, Mysore and Travencore, who enacted their own land
where the land continues to vest with the central government. These categories
are also exempted from the SIA provisions, as provided for in the 2013 act. The
2013 act facilitated land acquisition by private companies, which the 2015 bill
has changed to private entities. As per its definition, a private entity is an
entity other than a government entity and includes a proprietorship,
partnership, company, corporation, nonprofit organisation, or other entity under
any other law. The 2015 version also removes restrictions on acquisition of
land for private hospitals and private educational institutes.
(hg)
(hh)
(hi)
(hj)
(hk)
(hl)
(hm)
(hn)
(ho)