Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Contents
1. The Underlying Capitalism Nature of Firms...........................................3
1.1
1.2
2.2
2.3
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.2
4.3
4.4
2 | Page
With firms as large as a few nations gross domestic product (GDP), their influence on
the production, consumption, investment and hiring are of importance. Matters are amplified
as firm operations are increasingly complicated offshoring, outsourcing and subcontracting.
However despite how the way the economy has been transforming, the higher social
obligation is one whose can be traced to the very purpose of why corporations were first
allowed to exist (reclaimdemocracy.org 2015).
Towards fulfilling the calling, many firms till date still face difficulty overcoming
issues of ethics vs legality, labour standards violation in their production lines and upgrading
of suppliers in their value chain. To a certain extent, these problems continue to be
experienced due to the capitalism nature of firms and humans but also due to the increasing
challenges to manage a complex operation and to protect their firm capabilities.
1.
2001). Despite much activity at the supra national level, firms today still stretch the
boundaries of ethicality when in their quest for expansion and to maximise profits. In the
agricultural industry, firms secretly buy land (originally distributed to convert wasteland into
useful wealth redistribution tools for the poor) using third parties such as law firms and hedge
fund subsidiaries (Smallteacher & CorpWatch Blog 2013).
Such behaviour is not unique to the industry, many firms around the world from
different industries practice tax avoidance and governments of home and host country face a
great challenge to get firms to contribute back to where they get their value from (Rushe
2013; Holtzblatt et al. 2015; Newell 2008). While the use of the term corporation has been
around for a quite a long duration and therefore its meaning and governing rules has changed,
the fundamental principle of corporate taxation as a means of paying for the use of a
countrys resources and to redistribute income is enduring (Boadway et al. 1984; Levmore
1987). Hence firms should be expected to fulfil their social obligation. While governments
are attempting to fix loop holes in their tax system, it is after all a clamping down method. A
deeper understanding of the role of taxation suggest that there are opportunities available to
encourage shareholders to pressure managers about tax avoidance behaviour taxation
actually serves to reduce agency problems via stock options, tax shield encourages debt
financing and therefore greater managerial accountability (Levmore 1987; Miller 2005).
3 | Page
fair price is to ensure proceeds are used in a way that sustains the livelihood of the locals. To
tackle these problems, firms could choose two approaches. Firstly, they could buy
land/resources at fair value and educate the sellers on money management. Secondly instead
of buying, joint development with a majority stake would ensure locals receive proceeds
continuously and therefore would not be in lack or short changed. There are of course
challenges involved in executing such measures as operating in developing countries meant
that expropriation could happen easily and therefore the ability to full own and defend it
(even with private military) might be high valuable to firms. Firms will therefore need to
consider how to share the pie in a way that governments would support capitalism intrusion
into their grounds.
2.
standards. Despite much discussion on international round tables, violation and setting of
labour standards are still a prevailing problem. The latter would be of great concern as some
nations, intentionally relax formal institutions to encourage investment such as the setting
ridiculously low labour standards or advancement of labour ethics only in health and safety
(Davies & Vadlamannati 2013; Barrientos & Smith 2007). As every equation takes two hands
to clap, there will therefore be firms that are attracted to these institutional weaknesses and
behave in a way that violates Rawls Principle of Justice Difference Principle which
identify, from the socioeconomic perspective, the least advantaged representative man in
society. Requires the greatest benefit accrue to the least advantaged representative members
of society (Sandel 2010; Chan & Shenoy 2010). Hence despite the topic being repeatedly
surfaced, it is still highly relevant.
In addition to the nature of behaviour, an area firms find it difficult to manage is the
enforcing of good production standards to ensure high quality and zero downtime due to
human error or naps. At times, firms demand these employees to work extremely long hours
and fine them a days worth of bonuses for taking a nap or defects produced in their lines
(Chang & Corpwatch Blog 2014).
chain complies with labour standards (Bremer & Udovich 2001; Cella 2011). However,
monitoring of the impacts of the ethical standards is highly challenging and therefore any
claims of compliance from firms should be taken with a pinch of salt. When considering the
global value chain (GVC) structures of governance, compliance usually take place between
relational suppliers and not modular or contractual ones (Barrientos & Smith 2007). Hence,
firms that are mere excellent marketers and designers but do not manufacture their own
products such as Uniqlo find it challenging to monitor their supply chain often modular and
contractual (Chang & Corpwatch Blog 2014). As shown in Fig 1, 63% of developing
countries (or possibly higher as countries such as mainland China have been excluded from
the data) have a less than or equal to 0.5 inspection rate per 10,000 employees employed and
shown in Fig 2, again developing countries tend to be the ones that work the most per week;
these firms struggle to monitor their suppliers in developing countries (where violations are
most recorded) at greater capacity due to impossibility of zero cost of monitoring (Barrientos
& Smith 2007). Consequentially, some firms have turned to better screening and the referring
to databases that state supplier compliance ratings by other firms (Cella 2011).
Countries with <= 0.5 Labour Inspection Rate per 10,000 employed persons
6
Developed
Developing
10
Fig 1: Proportion of Countries with Low Labour Inspection Rate (International Labour Organisation 2015)
6 | Page
Developed
43%
Developing
57%
Fig 2: Proportion of Countries with the Most Hours Per Week (International Labour Organisation 2015)
7 | Page
3.
therefore its low skilled labour) to escape the poverty cycle, the fundamental issue lies with
are these countries truly able to escape poverty or is it all false hope. As shown in Fig 3
below, approximately 72% of the world lives below the average of the world while 28% of
the world live above, of which the average of these 28% is approximately double that of the
average world standard. Hence, not all countries are like Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea
which were successful in transiting from a manufacturing based economy to a
service/knowledge based economy.
8 | Page
Fig 3: Real GDP Per Capita and Shares of Global Population, ICP 2011 (International Bank for
Recpnstruction and Development 2015)
Matters are made worst due to the race to the bottom as institutions continually lax
regulations, firms and shareholders capture the wealth and prots, while the social and
environmental costs are externalized to the state and the public to pay for and absorb using
tax revenue (Newell 2008). Consequentially firms lack the incentive to upgrade. In addition,
lobbying by firms with tax revenue and employment level as bargaining chips meant that
social and political power of the state is weakened in comparison to firms and therefore even
if host countries do not provide a warm welcome, they have no choice but to contest to
Multinational Enterprises (MNE) request.
pockets, existing networks and male support. Biasness towards well to do dealers also took
place as poor woman had to come up with money (often borrowed) to buy their inventory but
well to do dealers were given credit terms.
Hence while this seems to be a trendy way of empowering woman and hiring
employees before the basic role of manufacturing, since only the rich are able to benefit from
the scheme, the mass majority of the population are most likely not able to benefit and would
remain stuck in the functions of manufacturing.
the real GDP graph in Fig 3 will shift towards an even taller left tailed graph though all
countries should expect to be better off resulting in an overall increase in the world average
real GDP. That being said, unlike the production life cycle theory, developing countries do
not exit and become redundant but continually upgrade (Gereffi et al. 2005). Hence we
might see more countries achieving the success of South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan.
competitors and intermediaries to ride on their brand image and ensure all goods produced
and delivered are of consistent quality and on time respectively (N. Sinkovics et al. 2014;
Acharya et al. 2010).
12 | P a g e
5.
impacts of firm behaviour on the environment is another area of concern. The principle of
universality is also violated as Egalitarian principle should be extended to all human beings
today and the future generations. All humanity has equal claim to it and have obligations
towards it. No one should take more than their fair share so as to deprive others of their fair
share or do anything that would have a detrimental effect on someone else because one would
not like others to do that to oneself. As a result, just as humans of this generation may point
fingers to the earlier generation for damaging the environment but not being the one bearing
the cost, firms (and consumers) of these generation should avoid doing the same to the next
generation.
Hence future research should look into ways firms can be more socially responsible
can look beyond the interrelated issues of labour, taxation, income inequality and upgrading
into environmental sustenance.
13 | P a g e
14 | P a g e
7.
References
Acharya, D.R. et al., 2010. Womens autonomy in household decisionmaking: a demographic study in Nepal. Reproductive health, 7(15),
pp.112.
Barrientos, S. & Smith, S., 2007. Do workers benefit from ethical trade?
Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems. Third
World Quarterly, 28(4), pp.713729. Available at:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01436590701336580.
Boadway, R., Bruce, N. & Mintz, J., 1984. The Role and Design of the
Corporate Income Tax. , pp.286300.
Bremer, J. & Udovich, J., 2001. Alternative approaches to supply chain
compliance monitoring. Journal of Fashion Marketing and
Management, 5(4), pp.333352.
Cella, M., 2011. Monitoring subcontracting in a suppliers hierarchy. Oxford
Economic Papers, 63, pp.523548.
Chan, G.K. & Shenoy, G.T., 2010. Ethics and Social Responsibility:Asian
and Western Perspective 2nd ed., Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education
(Asia).
Chang, M. & Corpwatch Blog, 2014. UNIQLO, Japanese Fast Fashion Label,
Accused of Labor Violations. CorpWatch, pp.14. Available at:
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=16018.
Davies, R.B. & Vadlamannati, K.C., 2013. A race to the bottom in labor
standards? An empirical investigation. Journal of Development
Economics, 103(1), pp.114. Available at:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.01.003.
Denning, S., 2012. Why Apple And GE Are Bringing Back Manufacturing.
Forbes Leadership, pp.14. Available at:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2012/12/07/why-apple-andge-are-bringing-manufacturing-back/.
Dunn, S.J., 2014. Beware Of Swiss Banks Urging Offshore Voluntary
Disclosure To IRS. Forbes Investing, pp.13. Available at:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stephendunn/2014/06/08/beware-ofswiss-banks-urging-ovdp/.
Floyd, S., 2001. Creating Shareholder Value through Supply Chain
Management. China Business Review, 28(1), pp.3642.
15 | P a g e
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
Rushe, D., 2013. Senators accuse Apple of highly questionable billiondollar tax avoidance scheme. The Guardian, pp.13. Available at:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/may/20/apple-accusedtax-avoidance-billions-scheme.
Sandel, M., 2010. Justice: Whats the Right Thing to Do? 1st ed., New York:
Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Schmalz, S. & Orth, R.U., 2012. Brand Attachment and Consumer
Emotional Response to Unethical Firm Behavior. Psychology &
Marketing, 29(11), pp.869884. Available at:
http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/23431/.
Sinkovics, N., Sinkovics, R.R. & Yamin, M., 2014. The role of social value
creation in business model formulation at the bottom of the pyramid Implications for MNEs? International Business Review, 23(4), pp.692
707. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.12.004.
Sinkovics, R.R. et al., 2014. Rising powers from emerging markets-the
changing face of international business. International Business
Review, 23, pp.675679.
Smallteacher, R. & CorpWatch Blog, 2013. Cargill Flouts Law to Secretly
Build Land Bank in Colombia. CorpWatch, pp.12. Available at:
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=15854 [Accessed April 25,
2015].
Toyota City Hall, 2009. Toyota City. Available at:
http://www.city.toyota.aichi.jp/en/ [Accessed April 15, 2015].
18 | P a g e