Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Chicago, 17th February 2010: US commercial real estate suffered its worst annual
capital return on record1, according to the IPD US Quarterly Property Indicator, which
fell -23.9% in 2009, taking the total capital decline to -33.4% from December 2007
when real estate values were at their peak.
While the pace of market value decline eased over the final quarter, continued cap rate
pressure together with weakening rental fundamentals is curbing optimism that 2010 is
the year of recovery. Cap rates softened by a further 140 basis points over the year to
end 2009 at 7.1%, the highest level in six years.
-10
-20
-30
2009 Peak-to-trough
-40
2009
San Francisco Los Angeles New York United States Chicago Washington
In the five city analysis, Washington‟s market values fell 180 basis points less than the
broader US market over the full year (-22.1%) – and by 200 basis points peak-to-
trough (-31.6%). The city which delivered the shallowest quarterly market value decline
was Chicago (-2.1%).
“2010 in many ways is a crunch year for US commercial real estate, explains Simon
Fairchild, Managing Director for North America at IPD. “The „extend and pretend‟
policies banks adopted last year to stave off loan-to-value covenant breaches may
have curbed the tide of rising loan delinquencies in the short-term, but lenders and
investors need to always retain a vigilant eye on the health of real estate
fundamentals. One focus this year will be to track signs of stress in occupier markets;
particularly in cities with rising vacancy rates.”
In addition, the East Coast delivered the lowest geographic capital decline,
outperforming Mid West and the South, in retail, offices and industrials. In the
apartment sector, the Mid West returned the shallowest annual capital decline. See
chart below (numbers available upon request).
US East-West Coast annual 2009 capital returns
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
East West US East West US East West US East West US
Investment Returns
US commercial real estate income returns were robust in 2009 at 6.6%, partially
offsetting the falls in value and contributing to an annual total return of -18.7%. At the
sector level, the strongest performer was retail, which outperformed the all property
average by 390 basis points, returning -14.8%, while at the other end of the spectrum
offices underperformed the wider market by 220 basis points, delivering -20.9%. The
industrial and apartment sectors returned -20.2% and -17.0% for 2009, respectively.
Over three, five and 10 year periods, US commercial real estate has returned -4.9%,
3.3% and 6.3% per annum.
Global Comparisons
The -23.9% 2009 market value decline in US commercial real estate compares with a
-3.8% decline in the UK, buoyed by a fourth quarter rally which saw British property
markets climb by a record 8.1%. The historically stable Netherlands real estate market
fell by -5.6% over 2009, while the world‟s worst hit market, Ireland, fell -28.9%.
Canada‟s annual capital and total returns will be published on Thursday, while IPD is
to publish the annual indices for Sweden, Denmark, Austria and Finland next week.
----------------------------------------------------ENDS---------------------------------------------------
Notes to editors:
1
This takes into account IPD‟s US data, which began in 1999, and NPI, which dates
back to 1978.
The IPD US Quarterly Property Indicator monitors the trends in underlying market
value and returns of $76.5bn of assets held by the leading real estate fund managers
in the US. The methodology ensures that only assets revalued by the end of each
quarter are included. This ensures that price movements over each quarter are
accurately reflected in headline all property, sector and segment level, which is acutely
important in rapidly declining markets.