Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The researchers also want to know the steps and procedures that the
Restaurant Management
Product/Service Quality
Place/Location of the
Restaurant
Statement
of the
Safety
andProblem
Sanitation
Resolve Customer
Problems and
Complaints effectively
Constantly improve
Product/Service
What are the specific problems that emerge in relation to Establishment Setting,
Staff Management Service, Quality of Food, and Safety and Sanitation, in consideration
Customer Satisfaction
Perceived Quality
3
Definition of Terms
the eyes of the customers. To be memorable, the restaurant must not only meet customer
expectations, the restaurant must exceed them (Marvin, 1997).
No matter how exotic or familiar the cuisine, today consumer desires a good
overall restaurant experience. Friendly, attentive service, tasty food, and a decent
atmosphere are just as critical to the success of an ethnic restaurant as they are to any
establishment (Mills, 2000).
In their analysis of food service research, Johns and Pine (2002) concluded that
consumer satisfaction is concerned not only with attribute values, but also with broader
value systems but also with the following observations: Consumer involvement is a
significant factor affecting restaurant customers satisfaction; US and Hong Kong
students had very different expectations of restaurant service (Asians valued respect,
unobtrusive helpfulness and personal cleanliness, while US students required eye contact,
personalization and product knowledge); Ways in which company values (i.e. corporate
culture) influence customer satisfaction.
Several scholars have studied the relationship between customer satisfactions and
repurchase. Pettijohn et al. (2002) measured customer satisfaction using empirical
attributes, finding that satisfied customers had a significantly higher intention of
returning. Bowen & Chen (2001) studied the relationship between customer loyalty and
customer satisfaction. Loyal customers spread positive word-of-mouth and make
recommendations to others. Creating loyal customers is critical for hospitality operators.
Their study verified that having satisfied customers is not sufficient to create loyalty;
hospitality operators must have extremely satisfied customers. Furthermore, the study
shows a small increase in customer satisfaction boosted customer loyalty dramatically. In
7
Chapter III
Method of Research
Research Design
This study entitled Customers Satisfaction to the Overall Management of
Selected Restaurant within the Vicinity of Sta. Mesa, Manila is a research attempts
to accumulate information and data regarding the level of customers satisfaction to
restaurants overall management.
Respondents
The Respondents of the study were Restaurant Customers within Sta. Mesa.
The researcher used stratified random sampling method where each member of the
population has an equal chance of being selected. Survey forms were given to
respondents personally. The total number of respondents is 50.
Research Instrument
The researchers use a survey questionnaire to collect necessary information
for the completion of the study. The basis of the respondents for evaluation is the last
full service restaurant they had frequented. It included perceptual measures that were
rated on seven point liker scales. This design is consistent with prior studies on
8
customer satisfaction and service quality. Each scale item was anchored at the
numerical 1 with the verbal statement strongly disagree and the numerical 5 with
the verbal statement strongly agree. Multiple items were used to measure each
construct so that their measurement properties could be evaluated on reliability and
validity. The scale items measuring the dependent variable were chosen to reflect
peoples overall satisfaction with the services provided by the restaurant.
Demographic data were also obtained from the respondents.
Data Gathering Procedure
The questionnaires were disseminated through mails to the respondents. Some
questionnaires were disseminated personally in the restaurants, with the managers
permission. The questionnaire was first reviewed and approved by the management of
the restaurant. The survey questionnaires information and data would be treated and
kept confidentially all throughout the study and beyond.
Statistical Treatment
To get the percentage, the researcher used the formula in tabulating the data:
% = (n/N) x 100, Where:
% = stands for the percentage
N = for the frequency of response
N = for the total number of responses
The questionnaire made use of the Likert scale. Factor analysis was conducted
with varimax rotation to examine how the selected measures loaded on expected
constructs. We have several specific areas that the respondents can determine the
particular issues and most commonly their complaints to the restaurants. We
9
summarized all the data that we got on questionnaire. The statistical data of each
factor was greater than one. The total cumulative variation explained by factor
analysis. The factor structure did not fully emerge expected.
Chapter IV
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data
Table 1 Gender
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Male
26
52%
Female
24
48%
TOTAL
50
100.00%
Table 1 show that the 52% of the Female respondents will go to restaurants, while the 48
% of Male respondents go to restaurants.
Table 2 Civil Status
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Single
28
56%
Married
10
20%
Separated
12
24%
Widow/er
0%
TOTAL
50
100.00%
Table 2 shows that among the respondents who frequent the restaurants are 56% Single
individuals, 24% are separated, while 20% of them are married. This data indicates that
the single respondents mostly come to the restaurants.
Table 3 Ages
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
10
Below - 30
23
46.00%
31 -40
18
36.00%
41 - 50
18.00%
51 - Above
0.00%
TOTAL
50
100.00%
Table 3 shows the different ages of the respondents. The 46% of them are below 30 years
old, 36.00% are 31 years old 40 years old, and only 18.00% are coming from the group
of 41 years old 50 years old.
Table 4 Work Status
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Yes
20
40.00%
No
12
24.00%
Student
18
36.00%
TOTAL
50
100.00%
Table 4 shows the working status of the respondents. 40.00% of the respondents are
working, 36.00% are students while 24% of them does not have work and are neither
students too.
14%
25
50.%
(3) Satisfactory
18%
(2) Good
18%
11
0%
TOTAL
50
100.00%
Table 5.1.1 shows that 14% of the respondents commend the restaurant for its
outstanding signage, and 50% of them are very satisfied. While 18% says that they are
satisfied and another 18% of them also thinks that the signage are good enough for the
identity of the restaurants.
Table 5.1.2 Room Temperature
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
(5) Outstanding
8%
10%
(3) Satisfactory
12%
(2) Good
15
30%
20
40%
TOTAL
50
100.00%
Table 5.1.2 shows that 40% of the respondents conveyed that the room temperature needs
improvement, 30% of them said that the temperature are good enough, 12% are satisfied
while only 10% and 8% of the respondents says that they are very satisfied and feels that
the room temperature was outstanding, respectively.
Table 5.1.3 Space and Seating Capacity
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
(5) Outstanding
8%
14%
(3) Satisfactory
17
34%
(2) Good
10%
17
34%
12
TOTAL
50
100.00%
Table 5.1.3 shows that the 34 % of the respondents says the space and seating capacity of
the restaurants good enough for the number of customers, another 34% of the respondents
say that the space and seating capacity needs improvement to accommodate more
customers, while 14% of the respondents says that they are satisfied with the space and
seating capacity, 10% of the respondents says that they are happy with the space and
seating capacity, while the 8% of the respondents are happy and very satisfied with the
space and seating capacity of the restaurants.
12
24.00%
16.00%
(3) Satisfactory
10
20.00%
(2) Good
18.00%
11
22.00%
50
100.00%
TOTAL
Table 5.1.4 shows that the 24% of the respondents are very much happy and satisfied
with the overall Atmosphere of the restaurants, 22% of the respondents says that the
restaurants needs improvement on the restaurants overall atmosphere, 20% of the
respondents says that the atmosphere of the respondents is good enough, while the 18%
and 16% of the respondents says that they are satisfied in the restaurants overall
atmosphere.
Table 5.2 FOOD SERVICES
Table 5.2.1 Freshness of Food Offered
13
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
(5) Outstanding
14%
16%
(3) Satisfactory
29
58%
(2) Good
12%
0.00%
50
100.00%
TOTAL
Table 5.2.1 shows that the 58% of the respondents are satisfied to the freshness of the
food offered of the restaurants, 16% of the respondents are very satisfied to the freshness
of the food, the 14% of the respondents dont have any complaint and they are happy
with the freshness of the food served by the restaurants while the 12% of the respondents
are feel good to the food.
Table 5.2.2 Taste of Food
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
(5) Outstanding
8%
14%
(3) Satisfactory
31
62%
(2) Good
16%
0%
TOTAL
50
100.00%
Table 5.2.2 shows that the 62% of the respondents are satisfied on the state of food served
of the restaurants, 16% of the respondents says that the taste of the food served is good
enough for them, 14% of the respondents says are happy to the food served and the 8% of
the respondents are satisfied and happy to the food served by the restaurants.
14
14%
14%
(3) Satisfactory
24
48%
(2) Good
12%
11%
50
100.00%
TOTAL
Table 5.2.3 shows that the 48% of the respondents says that they are satisfied on the
availability of the hot and cold beverages, 14% of the respondents says that they are
happy and satisfied and dont have complaint on the availability of the hot and cold
beverages, 12% of the respondents says that the availability of the hot and cold beverages
are good enough the 11% says that some of the restaurants needs improvement on the
availability of hot and cold beverages.
Table 5.2.4 Overall Food Quality
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
(5) Outstanding
18%
14%
(3) Satisfactory
28
56%
(2) Good
0%
12%
50
100.00%
TOTAL
Table 5.2.4 shows that the 56% of the respondents are satisfied on the overall food
quality served by the restaurants, 18% of the respondents dont have any complaint on the
15
overall food quality and that they are outstanding, 14% of the them are very satisfied but
12% of the respondents convey that the overall food quality served by the restaurants
needs improvements.
Table 6.1 STAFF AND MANAGEMENT
Table 6.1.1 Receptionist greets, smile at the customer upon entering the restaurant
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
(5) Strongly Agree
10%
(4) Agree
16%
27
54%
14%
(1) Disagree
6%
50
100.00%
TOTAL
Table 6.1.1 shows that the 54% of the respondents moderately agree that the receptionist
greets and smiles to them upon entering to the restaurants, 16% fully agree, while 14%
moderately disagree that the receptionist are friendly enough, 10%, on the other hand,
strongly agree that the receptionist smile and greet them upon entering to the restaurants.
Only 6% of the respondents are not satisfied to the restaurants receptionist friendliness
Table 6.1.2 Restaurant has enough number of staff to accommodate huge influx of
customers
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
(5) Strongly Agree
14%
(4) Agree
10%
29
58%
(2) Moderately
12%
(1) Disagree
6%
16
TOTAL
50
100.00%
Table 6.1.2 shows that the 58% of the respondents agreed moderately that the staff can
handle and served the huge influx of customer, 14% of the them strongly agreed that
staffs of the restaurants can handle and served the huge influx of the customer, 12%
agreed moderately that staffs can handle the huge influx of the customer,10% fully agree
that the staff can handle and served the huge influx of the customer but 6% of them
disagree that the restaurants number of staff cannot handle the huge influx of customers.
Table 6.1.3 Management staff wears proper uniform for easy identification
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
(5) Strongly Agree
10%
(4) Agree
13
26%
18
36%
16%
(1) Disagree
12%
50
100.00%
TOTAL
Table 6.1.3 shows that the 36% of the respondents moderately agreed that uniforms were
worn properly for easy identification, 26% of them agreed, 16% of them moderately
disagreed, and 12% of them were not happy and disagreed that staff were not wearing
proper uniform and that staff cannot be identified. Only 10% of the respondents strongly
agreed, and were happy and satisfied on the staff wearing proper uniform.
Table 6.1.4 Staff professional offered good service to the customer
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
(5) Strongly Agree
6%
(4) Agree
10%
17
29
58%
12%
(1) Disagree
14%
50
100.00%
TOTAL
Table 6.1.4 shows that the 58% of the respondents moderately agreed that the restaurants
staff served them professionally, but 14% of them disagree to the professionalism of the
staff, 12% moderately disagreed on the staff professionalism. Only 10% and 6% of the
respondents agreed and strongly agreed, respectively that the staff professionally served
them, the customers.
6%
(4) Agree
14%
26
52%
18%
(1) Disagree
10%
50
100.00%
TOTAL
Table 6.2.1 shows that the 52% of the respondents agreed moderately that they are safe in
the restaurants because of the presence of smoke detector and fire extinguisher, but 18%
of them moderately disagreed that fire extinguisher and smoke detector were available,
while 14% of them agreed that they are safe because of the fire extinguisher and smoke
18
detector availability. Only 10% of them feel that they are not safe on the restaurants
because the fire extinguisher and smoke detector are not visible to the restaurant while
only 6% of the respondents says that they are strongly agree that they are safe on the
restaurants because of the visibility of the fire extinguisher and smoke detector to the
vicinity of the restaurants.
18%
(4) Agree
10
20%
21
42%
(2) Moderately
12%
(1) Disagree
8%
50
100.00%
TOTAL
Table 6.2.2 shows that the 42% of the respondents moderately agreed that evacuation
maps and fire exit are available to the restaurant, 20% and 18% of them agreed and
strongly agreed, respectively, that the evacuation and map and fire exit is visible in
different areas of the restaurants. Only 12% and 8% of the respondents moderately
disagreed and fully disagreed, respectively, that evacuation maps and fire exits were
available and visible to the customers for emergency purposes.
Table 6.2.3 Cleanliness is observed in the comfort room
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
(5) Strongly Agree
6%
(4) Agree
21
42%
17
34%
19
(2) Moderately
12%
(1) Disagree
6%
50
100.00%
TOTAL
Table 6.2.3 shows that the 42% and 34% of the respondents fully agreed and moderately
agreed, respectively, that cleanliness was observed in the comfort room of the restaurants.
12% of them moderately disagree, and were unsatisfied to the untidiness of the comfort
room. Only 6% of them were greatly satisfied and strongly agreed that the comfort room
were clean, but also 6% of the respondents were greatly dissatisfied and stongly
disagreed to their comfort room cleanliness.
Table 6.2.4 Overall Safety and Sanitation is observed
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
(5) Strongly Agree
14%
(4) Agree
10
20%
20
40%
(2) Moderately
10
20%
(1) Disagree
6%
50
100.00%
TOTAL
Table 6.2.4 shows that the 40% and 20% of the respondents agreed moderately and fully
agreed, respectively, that they will be safe in the vicinity due to their overall safety and
sanitation measures. 20% of the respondents moderately disagreed that the overall safety
and sanitation measures of the company is enough to protect its customers. While 14%
of the respondents strongly agreed that the safety and sanitation observed by the
restaurants are adequate to protect their customers. Only 6% of them totally disagreed,
and were not satisfied to the overall safety and sanitation measures of the restaurant.
20
Chapter V
Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations
This study is about Restaurant Management and Customer satisfaction. This study
aims to find out the specific problems that emerge in relation to Establishment Setting,
Staff Management Service, Quality of Food, and Safety and Sanitation, in consideration
to the customer satisfaction with restaurants. The research had a total fifty (50)
respondents. A self-made survey questionnaire was used to gather information on the
customers evaluation on the restaurants overall management, at the same time, having
idea on the customers satisfaction level.
Major Findings
Based on the data gathered, the following are the major findings:
1. The respondents are single individuals with equal numbers of male and female, and
are below 30 years old. They are composed of workers and students.
2. The establishments room temperature, space and seating capacity and its overall
atmosphere earns the highest mean in needs improvement category. Although
Signages are place very satisfactorily.
3. The foods quality, freshness and taste were rated satisfactory.
4. Majority of the respondents agreed moderately on the professionalism,
accommodation, proper wearing of uniforms and the adequacy of the number of
staff.
5. On sanitation and safety, the respondents again agreed moderately on the
availability and functionality of fire extinguisher, evacuation map and fire exit.
Except for the cleanliness of comfort rooms that earns higher mean of 42% for
agree category.
21
Conclusions
Based on the major findings, the following are concluded:
1. Majority of the respondents are satisfied with the restaurants management on Food
Quality, Staff and the Quality of their Service, and Safety and Sanitation. Despite
being rated satisfactorily, there are still significant numbers of customers who were
dissatisfied with the restaurants service and management.
2. The restaurant establishment dissatisfies the customers. The Management needs to
improve the restaurants ambiance to attract and make customers stay in the area.
3. The Overall Restaurant Management affects significantly the satisfaction of
customers.
Recommendations
Based on the conclusions and results of the study, the recommendations are:
1. For future studies the researcher recommends that the number of respondents be
increased and the variety of restaurants be trimmed down to small population, for
more accurate results.
2. For additional research, it is recommended that other areas of study be undertaken on
the relationship of Customer Loyalty and Customer Satisfaction.
References
http://restaurant.about.com/od/Restauranthistory/a/A-History-Of-The-Restaurant.htm
Appelbaum, Robert, Dishing It Out: In Search of the Restaurant Experience (London:
Reaktion, 2011)
Gernet, Jacques (translated by H.M. Wright)(1962, Daily Life in China on the eve of
the Mongol Invasion, 1250-1276, Stanford: Stanford University Press, ISBN 0-80470720-0
22
Haley, Andrew P. Turning the Tables: Restaurants and the Rise of the American
10.1177/001088040 2434006.
Lundberg, Donald E., The Hotel and Restaurant Business, Boston: Cahners Book,
2007): 168-73
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Management_Concepts_and_Applications/Management
http://www.prospects.ac.uk/restaurant_manager_job_description.htm
http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/lib/thesis/2003/2003wakabayashit.pdf
https://shareok.org/bitstream/handle/11244/9686/Eliwa_okstate_0664M_2118.pdf?
sequence=
Payne-palacio, J., Harger, V., Shugart, G. & Theis, M. (1994). Introduction to
23
A SURVEY QUESTIONAIRE
ON
CUSTOMERS SATISFACTION TO THE OVERALL MANAGEMENT OF
SELECTED
RESTAURANT WITHIN THE VICINITY OF STA. MESA, MANILA
Direction: Kindly check or supply on the needed data as the item identified. Less
assured that any information in this questionnaire shall be treated in a confidential
manner.
I. Respondent Profile
Name (Optional): ___________________________________________
Sex:
( ) Male
( ) Female
Civil Status:
( ) Single
( ) Married
( ) Separated
( ) Widow/er
Age:
Working:
( ) Yes
( ) No
( ) Student
(3) Satisfactory
(2) Good
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
1. LOCATION/ ESTABLISHMENT
2. FOOD SERVICE
25
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
(4) Agree
(1) Disagree
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
26
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
27