Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Mike Miles
Superintendent of Schools
ii
Joan Bush
Mike Miles
Superintendent of Schools
iii
iv
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................... 1
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION ........................................................................................ 1
MAJOR EVALUATION QUESTIONS AND RESULTS ................................................................................. 2
How many first-year teachers were in the Dallas ISD each year, and how many of these were TFA
teachers? ................................................................................................................................................... 2
Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 2
How does classroom effectiveness of TFA teachers compare with other first-year teachers in the
district? ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 3
Results ................................................................................................................................................... 4
How does the STAAR performance of students of TFA teachers compare with students of other
teachers in the district?.............................................................................................................................. 7
Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 7
Results ................................................................................................................................................... 8
How does the retention of TFA teachers compare with non-TFA teachers in the district over time? ..... 25
Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 25
Results ................................................................................................................................................. 25
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................... 28
Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 28
Recommendation ................................................................................................................................. 29
List of Tables
Table
Page
Number of First-Year Teachers and TFA teachers by School Year Cohort .............. 2
Number of Teachers with Valid CEI Scores by Cohort and Subject ......................... 4
Logistic Regression Final Model Results for STAAR Reading Grades 6 to 8 ......... 17
10
Logistic Regression Final Model Results for STAAR Science Grade 5 .................. 22
11
Logistic Regression Final Model Results for STAAR Science Grade 8 .................. 22
12
13
vi
List of Figures
Figure
Page
Average CEIs by Cohort and Content Area for TFA vs. Non-TFA Teachers ............ 5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
viii
ABSTRACT
Teach For America (TFA) is a program that recruits recent college graduates and prepares them
to teach for two years in public schools. Since the 2009-2010 school year, 563 TFA teachers have
worked in the Dallas Independent School District (ISD). Analyses of variance comparing the effectiveness
of each cohort of TFA teachers in their first and second years to other teachers in their first or second
years with the Dallas ISD indicated that most TFA cohorts were more effective, on average, than the
comparison groups for both years. Several differences were statistically significant in mathematics and
science. Using data from the 2013-14 school year in a series of logistic regressions, the evaluators
assessed the impact of various teacher and student characteristics on students mathematics, reading,
science, and social studies STAAR passing rates. For mathematics, having a TFA teacher was
associated with significantly higher odds of passing across all grade levels after adjusting for student
characteristics and teacher experience; results varied for other subjects and grade levels. TFA interns
have returned to teach in the Dallas ISD for a second year at very high rates. As expected, a greater
proportion of non-TFA than TFA teachers remained in district classrooms for three years or longer.
Limitations
Sample size in subgroups was a limitation throughout the analyses. In some cases, comparisons
between TFA and non-TFA teachers were not possible due to insufficient sample sizes. For analyses of
student outcomes, only subgroups with at least two teachers were included. Though student sample sizes
were typically large enough to make statistical conclusions, a large number of students sometimes
represented a very small number of teachers. Therefore, results of subgroup analyses with small teacher
sample sizes should be interpreted with caution.
Upon consultation with representatives from TFA, 22 TFA teachers were discovered that were not
included in the Dallas ISDs list of first-year teachers. These teachers were evenly distributed across
content areas and grade levels, therefore not representing a large portion of any particular subgroup. The
corrections from TFA were not received in time to update the current analysis but were documented to
include in future TFA analyses.
Results
Table 1 shows the number of first-year teachers in the Dallas ISD by school year cohort. The
number of first-year teachers and first-year TFA teachers increased over time.
Table 1: Number of First-Year Teachers and TFA Teachers by School Year Cohort
Total Number of
Number of 1st Year
Percentage
st
School Year
1 Year Teachers
TFA Teachers
(%) of Total
2009-10
566
68
12.0
2010-11
707
97
13.7
2011-12
496
43
8.7
2012-13
1,363
84
6.2
2013-14
1,898
168
8.9
2014-15
1,124
103
9.2
Note: Number of TFA teachers included only TFA teachers found in the list of first-year teachers.
1
Cohort was determined using the teachers hire date into the Dallas ISD. For example, a teacher hired during the
summer preceding the 2013-14 school year or anytime during the 2013-14 school year would be included in the
2013-14 cohort.
2 CEI scores are available for Foreign Language and Computer Science, but the extremely low number of teachers
with scores on those indices would not allow for valid comparisons.
3 CEI scores measure teachers effectiveness relative to other teachers in the district each year and cannot be
compared from year to year. Year 1 and year 2 CEIs were available for each cohort except the 2013-14 cohort, which
had recently begun a second year in the Dallas ISD.
Results
The results from all 27 CEI comparisons are found in Figure 1. In general, TFA teachers were
more effective than non-TFA teachers in teaching language arts, mathematics, and science in both their
first and second years. No differences among teacher-types were statistically significant in language arts.
For all three subjects, the average effectiveness of both TFA and non-TFA teachers in the first four
cohorts (2009-10 through 2012-13) improved relative to all other teachers in the district during the second
year of teaching.
Language Arts
In Language Arts, first-year TFA teachers generally received slightly higher first-year CEI scores
than their non-TFA counterparts across all cohorts except the most recent, 2013-14 cohort (see Figure 1).
None of the comparisons were statistically significant. No first-year TFA or non-TFA average scores
eclipsed 50, the average for all district teachers.
Second-year TFA teachers had slightly higher CEI scores than non-TFA second-year teachers
with one exception: Non-TFA teachers in the 2009-10 cohort scored higher, on average, in their second
year than TFA teachers (M = 49.9 and M = 48.9, respectively). The TFA second-year teachers from the
2011-12 (M = 50.0) and 2012-13 (M = 50.6) cohorts scored at or above the district mean of 50. As with
the first year, differences among second-year teachers average Language Arts CEIs were not statistically
significant.
4
Language Arts
Mathematics
60
47.7
48.9 49.9
Science
55.7
55.7
51.5
50.0
46.7
46.3
45.8
47.6
48.2
36
First
Second
First
Second*
First
Second
60
53.2
47.9 47.1
48.9 48.4
First
Second
52.7
49.9
55.5
52.6
47.8
47.0
46.2
36
First*
Second
First
Second*
60
57.7
50.0
46.2 45.0
47.1
49.7
52.2
48.4
46.9
46.6
39.6
36
First
Second
First
Second
60
Mean CEI Score
(2012-13)
50.8
55.5
49.4
50.6
46.5
48.8
50.2
First*
Second*
56.6
54.8
51.1
49.4
46.6
44.9
36
First
Second
First
Second*
First*
Second*
60
45.0
46.5
50.8
49.8
46.1
46.4
36
First
First*
TFA
First*
Non-TFA
Mathematics
As indicated in Figure 1, TFA teachers mean CEI scores in Mathematics were consistently higher
than other first-year teachers across all five cohorts, ranging from 49.7 in 2011-12 to 53.2 in 2010-11.
During the 2010-11 school year, the average Mathematics CEI score for TFA interns was 7.0 points
higher than the average CEI score for other teachers. This result was statistically significant,
F(1, 138) = 10.58, p = .001, and of medium effect (2 = .07). TFA interns who began teaching during the
2013-14 school year averaged 3.7 points higher than other first-year teachers, also a statistically
significant result, F(1, 136) = 7.75, p = .006. The effect of teacher-type on effectiveness was small in this
instance (2 = .02).
The average Mathematics CEI scores for TFA interns in their second year were higher than other
second-year teachers across all cohorts. The results were statistically significant for the 2009-10 cohort,
F(1, 151) = 5.11, p = .025. The effect size, calculated as 2, was equal to .03. This indicated that the type
of second-year teacher (TFA or non-TFA) had a small to moderate effect on effectiveness. Results for the
2012-13 cohorts second year were also statistically significant, F(1, 246) = 8.35, p = .004, indicating a
small to moderate effect (2 = .03). Every TFA cohorts average CEI score was above the overall districts
average teacher score of 50, ranging from 52.2 in 2012-13 to 55.7 in 2009-10.
Science
TFA interns were generally more effective teaching science in their first year than other types of
teachers new to the Dallas ISD, especially in the three most recent cohorts. All cohorts except the first,
2009-10 TFA cohort, averaged CEI scores above 50, meaning they were, as a group, more effective than
most teachers in the Dallas ISD. With the exception of the 2009-10 cohort, TFA interns received higher
Science CEIs on average than non-TFA teachers in their first year (see Figure 1).4 First-year ANOVA
results were statistically significant for the 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14 cohorts. During the 2011-12
cohorts first year, TFA interns averaged 11.2 points higher than non-TFA teachers, F(1, 30) = 9.10,
p = .005. This difference indicated a large teacher-type effect (2 = .23) on classroom effectiveness. TFA
interns who began teaching with the 2012-13 cohort scored 9.9 points higher than other first-year
teachers on average, F(1, 105) = 20.09, p < .001, with the effect size (2) again indicative of a large
teacher-type effect by accounting for over 16 percent of the variance in effectiveness. The most recent
2013-14 cohort averaged 4.4 points higher in science than other teachers beginning that year,
F(1, 278) = 7.54, p = .006. The influence of teacher-type on effectiveness, for this cohort, could be
considered small to moderate (2 = .03).
The second year of teaching for these cohorts yielded results similar to the first year. Across the
four second-year TFA cohorts, average Science CEI scores were above the district overall average of 50,
ranging from 55.5 to 57.7. The three most recent TFA cohorts to complete a second year 2010-11,
2011-12, and 2012-13 averaged effectiveness scores in science that were statistically significantly
4 It should be noted that the number of interns with valid Science CEIs in the 2009-10 cohort was small (n = 5); the
difference was not statistically significant and should be reviewed with caution (see Table 2).
How does the STAAR performance of students of TFA teachers compare with
students of other teachers in the district?
Methodology
Students in grades three through eleven completed STAAR assessments in mathematics,
reading, science, and social studies, and STAAR End-of-Course (EOC) assessments in Algebra I,
English I and II, U.S. History, and Biology.5 Students were linked to teachers using the Dallas ISDs
course files, which listed the courses each student takes and the employee ID of the teacher. The
employee ID of each students teacher was used to label which 2013-14 students had teachers in their
first five years of service and whether those teachers were TFA or not.6 The course file was then merged
with STAAR results to determine if there were differences in STAAR performance between students of
TFA teachers and students of non-TFA teachers.7
Two analyses were completed for each subject area and grade level. First, the percentage of
students achieving a met expectations rating on STAAR was compared between TFA teachers and
non-TFA teachers in their first, second, or third- through fifth-years of teaching.8 A chi-square test of
independence was used to assess whether the difference in the percentages was statistically significant.
Second, hierarchical logistic regression was used to statistically test the impact of having a TFA teacher
on achieving a met expectations rating on STAAR. The dependent variable was a dichotomous indicator
of 1 if a student achieved a met expectations rating on 2013-14 STAAR and 0 if not. The predictor
variables included prior achievement (met expectations rating on 2012-13 STAAR), ethnicity, sex,
5
Results
STAAR Performance Overview
Figures 2 through 4 show STAAR performance for students of TFA teachers at various levels of
experience compared with students of non-TFA teachers. These percentages were further compared to
passing rates across all teachers at TFA campuses to offer perspective on how students of these
early-career TFA and non-TFA teachers performed relative to students of all teachers at the same
campuses.
Comparing across the three levels of experience and content areas, students of second-year TFA
teachers had higher passing percentages than students of first-year TFA teachers. For mathematics,
there was a trend of TFA teachers outperforming non-TFA teachers in the second year of experience.
This was also true for elementary science. However, this trend was less apparent in reading/language
arts. Small sample sizes resulted in missing data and precluded comparisons in many subgroups,
impeding trend detection. More detailed analyses of STAAR performance data by grade level and content
area follow.
Figure 2: Percentage That Met Expectations on Spring 2014 STAAR for Students of First-Year TFA and Non-TFA
Teachers
93 90 92
74
55
54
78 78
55 55 56
51 50
56
60 60
64
55
ES
MS
Alg I
ES
Mathematics
MS
54
45
48
Eng I
Eng II
41
42
59
52
49 51
ES
Reading/Language Arts
TFA
Non-TFA
59 61
65
63
MS
56 53
Bio
Science
MS
Social
Studies
All
Figure 3: Percentage That Met Expectations on Spring 2014 STAAR for Students of Second-Year TFA and
Non-TFA Teachers
95 95 92
86
64
78
75 70
56
55 55
81
55
61 57
56
65 67 64
63
55
69
63
54
62
52
53
36
ES
MS
Alg I
ES
Mathematics
MS
Eng I
Eng II
ES
Reading/Language Arts
TFA
Non-TFA
MS
Bio
Science
MS
Social
Studies
All
Figure 4: Percentage That Met Expectations on Spring 2014 STAAR for Students of Third- through Fifth-Year
TFA and Non-TFA Teachers
92
79 78 78
76
62
55
ES
48
59 56
56
MS
Mathematics
75
70
64 64 64
71
54
55
44
Alg I
ES
MS
Eng I
Eng II
Reading/Language Arts
TFA
Non-TFA
63
53
53 52
ES
MS
Science
Bio
MS
Social
Studies
All
Note: Some subgroups were excluded from these figures due to small teacher sample sizes (n < 2). District
percentages reflect students only in schools with TFA teachers in each subgroup. ES = Elementary School.
MS = Middle School.
Mathematics
Figure 5 shows the percentages of elementary students that met expectations on STAAR
mathematics. Percentages were compared between first-year, second-year, and third- through fifth-year
TFA and non-TFA teachers. For all levels of experience, a statistically significant higher percentage of
elementary students of TFA teachers than non-TFA teachers passed STAAR mathematics.
Figure 5: Percentage That Met Expectations on STAAR Mathematics for Students of TFA and Non-TFA Teachers
(Grades 3 to 5)
76%
Number of Teachers and Students
Represented in the Analysis
64%
62%
TFA
Non-TFA
55%
54%
1st year teachers
42%
Teachers
12
22
Students
349
814
Non-TFA
9
254
10
265
Note: Asterisks indicate level of significance for chi-square test of independence *p < .05 and **p <.001.
Figure 6 shows the percentages of middle school students passing STAAR mathematics. For
first-year teachers, there was no difference between TFA teachers and non-TFA teachers in percentage
of students passing (55%). For second-year teachers, a higher percentage of students of TFA teachers
(75%) passed STAAR mathematics compared with students of non-TFA teachers (70%), but this
difference was not statistically significant. Passing percentages could not be compared for third- through
fifth-year teachers because only one TFA teacher was represented in that subgroup.
10
n/a
1st year teachers
Non-TFA
6
519
Note: These differences were not statistically significant. Percentage was not reported for students of third- through
fifth-year TFA teachers because there was only one teacher represented in this subgroup.
At the high school level, Figure 7 shows passing percentages on the STAAR Algebra I EOC
exam. For first-year and third- through fifth-year teacher subgroups, there was no statistically significant
difference between TFA teachers and non-TFA teachers in percentage of students passing. For
second-year teachers, a higher percentage of students of TFA teachers (86%) passed STAAR
mathematics compared with students of non-TFA teachers (55%). The difference was statistically
significant.
Figure 7: Percentage That Met Expectations on STAAR Algebra 1 EOC for Students of TFA and Non-TFA
Teachers
86%
Number of Teachers and Students
79% 78%
78%
Represented in the Analysis
74%
TFA
Non-TFA
55%
1st year teachers
Teachers
14
4
Students
1,038
248
2nd year teachers
Teachers
6
Students
472
1st year teachers
Non-TFA
3
152
Note: Asterisk indicates level of significance for chi-square test of independence *p < .001.
Logistic regression results for elementary STAAR mathematics are shown in Table 3. The results
indicated that prior achievement, teacher experience level, and TFA status were associated with
11
Logistic regression results for middle school STAAR mathematics are shown in Table 4. The
results indicated that prior achievement, teacher experience level, and TFA participation were associated
with significantly greater likelihood of passing STAAR mathematics. The odds ratio for TFA status
indicated that middle school students of TFA teachers were 1.230 times more likely to pass STAAR
mathematics than students of non-TFA teachers when teacher experience and student characteristics
were held constant. The addition of TFA status in Model 3 resulted in a statistically significant
improvement in overall model fit,11 indicating that TFA status had an impact on STAAR performance over
and above other student and teacher characteristics in the model.
Across all teachers (TFA and non-TFA), compared with Hispanic students, students who were
African American were significantly less likely to pass STAAR (about half as likely; odds ratio = 0.476)
after holding teacher experience and student characteristics constant. According to the odds ratio,
students who passed STAAR mathematics in 2012-13 were 8.205 times more likely to pass STAAR in
9
Odds ratios greater than one indicated the predictor was associated with greater likelihood of passing STAAR. Odds
ratios less than one indicated the predictor was associated with less likelihood of passing STAAR.
10 Addition of TFA status in Model 3 increased Nagelkerke R2 from .392 (Model 2) to .431. Model fit improvement as
measured by -2 log likelihood was statistically significant (p < .001).
11 Addition of TFA status in Model 3 increased Nagelkerke R2 from .331 (Model 2) to .332. Model fit improvement as
measured by -2 log likelihood was statistically significant (p = .015).
12
Logistic regression results for STAAR Algebra I EOC are shown in Table 5. The results indicated
that prior achievement and TFA status were associated with significantly greater likelihood of passing
STAAR Algebra I EOC. The odds ratio for TFA status indicated that Algebra I students of TFA teachers
were 1.630 times more likely to pass the Algebra I EOC exam than students of non-TFA teachers when
teacher experience and student characteristics were held constant. The addition of TFA status in Model 3
resulted in a statistically significant improvement in overall model fit,12 indicating that TFA status had an
impact on STAAR performance over and above other student and teacher characteristics in the model.
Across all teachers (TFA and non-TFA), students who passed STAAR mathematics in 2012-13
were 3.951 times more likely to pass STAAR in 2013-14 after holding teacher experience and student
characteristics constant. Compared with Hispanic students, students who were African American were
significantly less likely to pass the STAAR EOC (odds ratio = 0.719) when teacher experience and
student characteristics were held constant. No other student or teacher characteristics were significant
predictors of passing STAAR.
Table 5: Logistic Regression Final Model Results for STAAR Algebra I End-of-Course Exam
Predictor
Odds Ratio
B
z
1.374
128.348**
3.951
STAAR Mathematics Met Expectations 2012-13
-0.330
5.460*
0.719
African American
0.136
0.128
Other Ethnicity
-0.185
2.370
Male
0.104
0.329
Low SES
0.180
1.532
Second-year teacher
0.303
2.919
Third- through fifth-year teacher
0.488
12.491**
1.630
TFA
Note: Final model Nagelkerke R2=.125. *p < .05 and **p <.001.
12 Addition of TFA status in Model 3 increased Nagelkerke R2 from .116 (Model 2) to .125. Model fit improvement as
measured by -2 log likelihood was statistically significant (p < .001).
13
Reading/Language Arts
Figure 8 shows passing percentages on STAAR reading for students in grades three through five.
For first-year and second-year teacher subgroups, there was no statistically significant difference
between TFA teachers and non-TFA teachers in percentage of students passing. For third- through
fifth-year teachers, a statistically significant higher percentage of students of TFA teachers (70%) passed
STAAR reading compared with students of non-TFA teachers (59%).
Figure 8: Percentage That Met Expectations on STAAR Reading for Students of TFA and Non-TFA Teachers
(Grades 3 to 5)
Number of Teachers and Students
70%
Represented in the Analysis
61%
59%
57%
TFA
Non-TFA
51% 50%
1st year teachers
Teachers
19
33
Students
662
1,058
2nd year teachers
Teachers
4
Students
173
1st year teachers
Non-TFA
15
481
Note: Asterisks indicate level of significance for chi-square test of independence *p < .05.
Figure 9 shows passing percentages on STAAR reading for students in grades six through eight.
For all teacher subgroups, there was no statistically significant difference between TFA teachers and
non-TFA teachers in percentage of students passing.
14
Non-TFA
14
767
Figure 10 shows passing percentages on the STAAR English I EOC assessment. There was no
statistically significant difference between first-year TFA teachers and non-TFA teachers in percentage of
students passing. However, the percentage of students passing was statistically significantly higher for
students of third- through fifth-year non-TFA teachers (75%) than students of TFA teachers (44%).
Figure 10: Percentage That Met Expectations on STAAR English 1 EOC for Students of TFA and Non-TFA
Teachers
Number of Teachers and Students
Represented in the Analysis
75%
TFA
Non-TFA
1st year teachers
Teachers
4
5
45%
44%
41%
Students
363
274
2nd year teachers
Teachers
0
Students
0
n/a
1st year teachers
Non-TFA
1
133
Note: Asterisks indicate level of significance for chi-square test of independence *p < .001. Percentage is not
reported for students of second-year teachers because there was only one non-TFA teacher and no TFA teachers
represented in this subgroup.
Figure 11 shows passing percentages on the STAAR English II EOC assessment. A significantly
greater percentage of students of first-year TFA teachers passed the English II EOC (59%) than students
of non-TFA teachers (48%). Sixty-three percent of students of non-TFA second-year teachers passed the
English II EOC. Comparisons between TFA and non-TFA were not possible for second- or third- through
fifth-year teachers due to small teacher sample sizes.
15
Figure 11: Percentage That Met Expectations on STAAR English 2 EOC for Students of TFA and Non-TFA
Teachers
Number of Teachers and Students
Represented in the Analysis
TFA
Non-TFA
63%
1st year teachers
59%
48%
Teachers
4
5
Students
354
302
n/a
n/a
1st year teachers*
Non-TFA
2
209
Note: Asterisks indicate level of significance for chi-square test of independence *p < .05. Some percentages were
not reported due to small sample sizes.
Logistic regression results for elementary STAAR reading are shown in Table 6. The results
indicated that prior achievement, teacher experience level, and TFA participation were associated with
significantly greater likelihood of passing STAAR reading.13 Elementary students of TFA teachers had
1.607 times higher odds of passing STAAR reading than students of non-TFA teachers after holding
teacher experience and student characteristics constant. The addition of TFA status in Model 3 resulted
in a statistically significant improvement in overall model fit,14 indicating that TFA status had an impact on
STAAR performance over and above other student and teacher characteristics in the model.
Across all teachers (TFA and non-TFA), students who passed STAAR reading in 2012-13 were
11.869 times more likely to pass STAAR reading in 2013-14 when teacher experience and student
characteristics were held constant. The odds of students of second-year teachers passing the STAAR
were 1.585 times higher than the students of first-year teachers, but students of third- through fifth-year
teachers were not significantly more or less likely to pass STAAR when holding teacher experience and
student characteristics constant. Compared with Hispanic students, students who were African American
were significantly less likely to pass STAAR (odds ratio = 0.623).
13
Odds ratios greater than one indicated the predictor is associated with greater likelihood of passing STAAR. Odds
ratios less than one indicated the predictor is associated with less likelihood of passing STAAR.
14 Addition of TFA status in Model 3 increased Nagelkerke R2 from .376 (Model 2) to .383. Model fit improvement as
measured by -2 log likelihood was statistically significant (p < .001).
16
Logistic regression results for middle school STAAR reading are shown in Table 7. The results
indicated that prior achievement and teacher experience level were associated with significantly greater
likelihood of passing STAAR reading, while being classified as male and low SES were associated with
less likelihood of passing. Having a TFA teacher was not a significant predictor of passing STAAR
reading for middle school students. The addition of TFA status in Model 3 did not result in a statistically
significant improvement in overall model fit, indicating that TFA status did not have an impact on STAAR
performance over and above other student and teacher characteristics in the model.
Across all teachers (TFA and non-TFA) and with teacher experience and student characteristics
held constant, students who passed STAAR reading in 2012-13 were 9.298 times more likely to pass
STAAR reading in 2013-14. Compared with first-year teachers, the odds of students of second-year
teachers passing the STAAR were 1.324 times higher, and students of third- through fifth-year teachers
were 1.249 more likely to pass STAAR when student characteristics were held constant. Middle school
males were significantly less likely than females to pass STAAR reading (odds ratio = 0.655).
Furthermore, students with low SES were less likely to pass STAAR reading (odds ratio = 0.621) when
holding teacher experience and other student characteristics constant.
Table 7: Logistic Regression Final Model Results for STAAR Reading Grades 6 to 8
Predictor
STAAR Reading Met Expectations 2012-13
African American
Other Ethnicity
Male
Low SES
Second-year teacher
Third- through fifth-year teacher
Odds Ratio
2.230
1,232.991**
9.298
-0.119
1.628
0.294
2.425
-0.423
44.136**
0.655
-0.476
15.498**
0.621
0.280
14.591**
1.324
0.223
6.083*
1.249
Note: Final model Nagelkerke R2=.322. *p < .05 and **p <.001. TFA was not a significant predictor
and was not included in the final model.
Logistic regression results for the STAAR English I EOC exam are shown in Table 8. The results
indicated that prior achievement and teacher experience level were associated with significantly greater
likelihood of passing the STAAR English I EOC, while having a TFA teacher was associated with less
likelihood of passing. The odds ratio indicated that students of TFA teachers were about half as likely to
pass the English I EOC as students of non-TFA teachers (odds ratio = 0.491) when holding teacher
17
Logistic regression results for the STAAR English II EOC exam are shown in Table 9. The results
indicated that prior achievement and teacher experience level were associated with significantly greater
likelihood of passing the STAAR English II EOC, while being African American or male were associated
with less likelihood of passing. Having a TFA teacher was not a significant predictor of passing the
STAAR English II EOC exam. The addition of TFA status in Model 3 did not result in a statistically
significant improvement in overall model fit, indicating that TFA status did not have an impact on STAAR
performance over and above other student and teacher characteristics in the model.
Across all teachers (TFA and non-TFA), students who passed the STAAR Reading I EOC in
2012-13 were 10.056 times more likely to pass STAAR English II EOC in 2013-14 after holding other
student characteristics and teacher experience constant. Compared with students of first-year teachers,
students of third- through fifth-year teachers were 1.781 times more likely to pass STAAR. Students who
were African American had lower odds of passing than students who were Hispanic (odds ratio = 0.417),
and students who were male were about half as likely to pass as females (odds ratio = 0.563) when
holding constant teacher experience and other student characteristics. No other student or teacher
characteristics were significantly associated with passing the English II EOC.
15 Addition of TFA status in Model 3 increased Nagelkerke R2 from .250 (Model 2) to .273. Model fit improvement as
measured by -2 log likelihood was statistically significant (p < .001).
18
Science
Figure 12 shows passing percentages on STAAR science for students in grade five. There was
no statistically significant difference between first-year TFA teachers and non-TFA teachers in percentage
of students passing. However, the percentage of students passing was statistically significantly higher for
students of second-year TFA teachers (69%) than students of non-TFA teachers (36%). Though 53
percent of students of third- through fifth-year non-TFA teachers passed STAAR science, there were no
students of TFA teachers in this subgroup with which to compare.
19
Non-TFA
4
139
Note: Asterisks indicate level of significance for chi-square test of independence *p < .05. Some percentages were
not reported due to small sample sizes.
Figure 13 shows passing percentages on STAAR science for students in grade eight. There was
no statistically significant difference between first-year TFA teachers and non-TFA teachers in percentage
of students passing. For second-year TFA teachers, 81 percent of students passed STAAR science,
while 71 percent of third- through fifth-year TFA teachers passed. There were no non-TFA second or
third- through fifth-year teachers.
Figure 13: Percentage That Met Expectations on STAAR Science for Students of TFA and Non-TFA Teachers
(Grade 8)
Number of Teachers and Students
Represented in the Analysis
81%
TFA
Non-TFA
71%
59% 61%
1st year teachers
Teachers
4
2
Students
422
209
n/a
1st year teachers
Non-TFA
n/a
3rd-5th year teachers
0
0
0
0
Note: These differences are not statistically significant. Some percentages were not reported due to small sample
sizes.
Figure 14 shows passing percentages on the STAAR Biology EOC. There was no statistically
significant difference for first-year or second-year TFA teachers and non-TFA teachers in percentage of
students passing. There were no non-TFA third- through fifth-year teachers to compare with TFA
teachers.
20
Figure 14: Percentage That Met Expectations on STAAR Biology EOC for Students of TFA and Non-TFA Teachers
95% 95%
93% 90%
Number of Teachers and Students
Represented in the Analysis
TFA
Non-TFA
1st year teachers
Teachers
6
7
Students
660
586
n/a
1st year teachers
Non-TFA
4
408
0
0
Note: These differences are not statistically significant. Some percentages were not reported due to small sample
sizes.
Logistic regression results for STAAR science for grade five are shown in Table 10. The results
indicated that prior achievement, teacher experience level, and TFA status were associated with
significantly greater likelihood of passing STAAR science, while no predictors were associated with less
likelihood of passing. The odds ratio for TFA status indicated that fifth-grade students of TFA teachers
had 1.684 times higher odds of passing STAAR science than students of non-TFA teachers when holding
teacher experience and student characteristics constant. The addition of TFA status in Model 3 resulted
in a statistically significant improvement in overall model fit,16 indicating that TFA status had an impact on
STAAR performance over and above other student and teacher characteristics in the model.
Across all teachers (TFA and non-TFA), students who passed STAAR mathematics in 2012-1317
were 6.158 times more likely to pass STAAR science in 2013-14. Compared with first-year teachers,
students of third- through fifth-year teachers were 1.632 times more likely pass STAAR when student
characteristics were held constant. No other student or teacher characteristics were significantly
associated with passing STAAR science at grade five.
16
Addition of TFA status in Model 3 increased Nagelkerke R2 from .226 (Model 2) to .238. Model fit improvement as
measured by -2 log likelihood was statistically significant (p < .01).
17 STAAR mathematics was used as an indicator of prior achievement for STAAR science in grades five and eight
because no STAAR science assessment was administered to students in grades four and seven to serve as prior
achievement. For Biology EOC, which is administered primarily to students in grade nine, grade eight STAAR science
was used as prior achievement.
21
Odds Ratio
6.158
1.632
1.684
Note: Final model Nagelkerke R2=.238. *p < .05 and **p <.001. STAAR Mathematics used as prior
achievement due to absence of 2012-13 science assessment results for grade four.
Logistic regression results for STAAR science for grade eight are shown in Table 11. The results
indicated that prior achievement, being male, and teacher experience level were associated with
significantly greater likelihood of passing STAAR science, while being African American was associated
with less likelihood of passing. Having a TFA teacher was not a significant predictor of passing STAAR
science in grade eight. The addition of TFA status in Model 3 did not result in a statistically significant
improvement in overall model fit, indicating that TFA status did not have an impact on STAAR
performance over and above other student and teacher characteristics in the model.
Across all teachers (TFA and non-TFA), students who passed STAAR mathematics in 2012-13
were 6.574 times more likely to pass STAAR science in 2013-14. Compared with females, males were
1.389 times more likely to pass STAAR science. Compared with first-year teachers, students of secondyear teachers were 2.441 times more likely pass STAAR. Students who were African American were less
likely than Hispanic students to pass (odds ratio = 0.680). No other student or teacher characteristics
were significantly associated with passing STAAR science.
Table 11: Logistic Regression Final Model Results for STAAR Science Grade 8
Predictor
B
z
1.883
154.419**
STAAR Mathematics Met Expectations 2012-13
-0.385
4.032*
African American
0.540
1.341
Other Ethnicity
0.328
4.796*
Male
-0.026
0.011
Low SES
0.892
18.771**
Second-year teacher
0.140
0.538
Third- through fifth-year teacher
Odds Ratio
6.574
0.680
1.389
2.441
Note: Final model Nagelkerke R2=.272. *p < .05 and **p <.001. TFA was not a significant predictor and
was not included in the final model. STAAR Mathematics used as prior achievement due to absence of
2012-13 science assessment results for grade seven.
Logistic regression results for the STAAR Biology EOC exam are shown in Table 12. The results
indicated that prior achievement and teacher experience level were associated with significantly greater
likelihood of passing STAAR science, while being male was associated with less likelihood of passing.
Having a TFA teacher was not a significant predictor of passing the Biology EOC exam. The addition of
TFA status in Model 3 did not result in a statistically significant improvement in overall model fit, indicating
22
Social Studies
Figure 15 shows passing percentages on STAAR social studies for students in grade eight. A
statistically significant higher percentage of students of first-year TFA teachers passed STAAR social
studies than students of non-TFA teachers. Sixty-two percent of students of second-year TFA teachers
passed STAAR social studies, but the sample size of teachers for non-TFA second-year teachers and all
third- through fifth-grade teachers was insufficient for any further comparisons.
23
n/a
1st year teachers*
n/a
3rd-5th year teachers
Non-TFA
1
115
Note: Asterisks indicate level of significance for chi-square test of independence *p < .01.
Logistic regression results for STAAR social studies for grade eight are shown in Table 13. The
results indicated that prior achievement, being an ethnicity other than Hispanic or African American, being
male, and TFA status were associated with significantly greater likelihood of passing STAAR social
studies, while teacher experience level was associated with less likelihood of passing. The odds ratio for
TFA status indicated that eighth grade students of TFA teachers had 1.622 times higher odds of passing
STAAR social studies than students of non-TFA teachers when controlling for teacher experience and
certain student characteristics. The addition of TFA status in Model 3 resulted in a statistically significant
improvement in overall model fit,18 indicating that TFA status had an impact on STAAR performance over
and above other student and teacher characteristics in the model.
Across all teachers (TFA and non-TFA), students who passed STAAR reading in 2012-1319 were
9.307 times more likely to pass STAAR social studies in 2013-14. Students of ethnicity other than
Hispanic or African American were 2.363 times more likely to pass STAAR social studies. Males were
1.391 times as likely as females to pass STAAR social studies. Compared with first-year teachers,
students of second-year teachers were less likely to pass STAAR social studies (odds ratio = 0.726)
when student characteristics were held constant. No other student or teacher characteristics were
significantly associated with passing STAAR social studies at grade eight.
18
Addition of TFA status in Model 3 increased Nagelkerke R2 from .283 (Model 2) to .292. Model fit improvement as
measured by -2 log likelihood was statistically significant (p < .001).
19 STAAR reading was used as an indicator of prior achievement for STAAR social studies in grade eight because no
STAAR social studies assessment is administered to students in grade seven to serve as prior achievement.
24
U.S. History students completed the U.S. History STAAR EOC exam. There was only one TFA
teacher teaching U.S. History. The campus where this teacher taught (L. G. Pinkston High School) had
no other first-year teachers with which to form a comparison group for STAAR passing rates on U.S.
History EOC. Therefore, no results for U.S. History STAAR EOC were included in this report.
Social Studies Results Summary
A significantly higher percentage of students of first-year TFA teachers passed STAAR social
studies in grade eight than students of first-year non-TFA teachers. Furthermore, the logistic regression
results indicated that students of TFA teachers had 1.6 times higher odds of passing STAAR social
studies in grade eight than students of non-TFA teachers when holding teacher experience and student
characteristics constant. Small sample sizes prohibited comparisons for second- and third- through
fifth-year teachers.
How does the retention of TFA teachers compare with non-TFA teachers in the
district over time?
Methodology
The evaluator compared the percentage of Dallas ISD TFA interns and other first-year teachers
retained over time by cohort. A teacher was defined as retained if he or she began the following school
year as a teacher. Teachers listed in district databases as On Leave were considered as retained.
Members of the 2009-10 cohort could have potentially taught in the district at the beginning of six years,
while the 2013-14 cohort had only begun their second year of teaching. For each year of each cohort, the
evaluator calculated the percentage of TFA and non-TFA teachers remaining with the district. Because
TFA requests a two-year commitment from its teachers, it should be expected that lower proportions of
TFA teachers than non-TFA teachers would return for a third year of teaching.
Results
Across all cohorts, TFA teachers returned to teach a second school year in the Dallas ISD at
higher rates than non-TFA teachers (see Figures 16-20). For all cohorts, non-TFA teachers returned to
teach a third year at higher rates than TFA teachers. This result was expected, as TFA requests a
two-year commitment from the interns it recruits. TFA cohorts second-year retention rates ranged from
25
Percent Retained
TFA
Non-TFA
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
Year Began
6th
Figure 17 illustrates the retention rates for the 2010-11 TFA and non-TFA teachers beginning a
second through fifth year with the Dallas ISD. TFA teachers returned for a second year at slightly higher
rates than other second-year teachers (n = 92, 94.8% and n = 525, 86.0%, respectively). Of the original
610 non-TFA teachers starting with the 2010-11 cohort, 414 (67.9%) began a third year as a teacher with
the Dallas ISD. Comparatively, 33.0 percent (n = 32) of the TFA teachers began a third year.
26
TFA
Percent Retained
Non-TFA
2nd
3rd
4th
Year Began
5th
As is shown in Figure 18, the trend of TFA teachers returning for a second year at higher rates
(n = 39, 90.7%) than other teachers was also true for the 2011-12 cohort (n = 367, 81.0%). However, as
with the previous cohorts, a lower proportion of TFA teachers (n = 17, 39.5%) than other types of
teachers (n = 269, 59.4%) began a third year in the classroom.
Figure 18: 2011-12 Cohort Retention Rate by Year Began
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent Retained
TFA
Non-TFA
2nd
3rd
Year Began
4th
After their first year as teachers in the Dallas ISD during the 2011-12 school year, 95.2 percent of the TFA
teachers returned a second year (n = 80); 37 of the original 84 interns 44.0 percent began a third year
(see Figure 19). Whereas 1,279 non-TFA teachers started with the Dallas ISD during the 2011-12 school
year, exactly 946 (73.4%) returned a second year, a proportion lower than previous cohorts; 57.6 percent
of non-TFA teachers returned a third year (n = 737).
27
TFA
Percent Retained
Non-TFA
2nd
3rd
Year Began
As shown in Figure 20, of the 168 TFA interns who began teaching during the 2013-14 school
year, 157 returned to teach a second year (93.5%). Comparatively, 73.6 percent of the 1,730 non-TFA
teachers returned to Dallas ISD classrooms (n = 1,274).
Figure 20: 2013-14 Cohort Second-Year Retention
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
TFA
Percent Retained
Non-TFA
2nd
Year Began
Teacher Retention
TFA interns in each cohort have returned to teach a second year with the Dallas ISD at rates
ranging from 90.7 to 100.0 percent. For each cohort, these rates were higher than the rates of non-TFA
teachers. Because TFA requires a two-year teaching commitment, smaller proportions of TFA teachers
returned for a third year when compared to non-TFA teachers. Overall, the proportion of all beginning
TFA and non-TFA teachers returning for a third year has declined with each cohort since 2009-10.
Recommendation
Find ways to encourage TFA teachers to stay in the Dallas ISD classrooms beyond their
two-year commitment. TFA teachers in the Dallas ISD have historically been effective classroom
teachers. Results from the CEI analyses indicated that second-year TFA teachers have been, on
average, more effective teaching mathematics and science than other teachers in the district. The logistic
regression analyses revealed that mathematics students of TFA teachers at all grade levels had
increased odds of meeting the 2013-14 STAAR standards when accounting for student characteristics
and teacher experience. The district should encourage TFA teachers to return to the classroom for a third
year and beyond.
29