Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Anaximander
are for gold and gold for goods. There is a downward path, whereby fire
turns to water and an upward path, whereby earth turns to water, water to
air, and air to fire. Heraclitus believed that fire makes the basic stuff. The
process of becoming or change finds its origin in fire. It is the origin of all
matter. So, what has fire to do with man? Evidently, the 37 degrees Celsius
temperature of the human body provides us with the clue that man is
grounded in the world. Thus, if the world is fire, man, too, has fire in him in
the form of heat.
Pythagoras
The Pythagoreans the name of the followers of Pythagoras were
convinced that man is a dipartite of body and soul. They are the first to
approach man in this perspective. The Pythagoreans are the true pioneers of
the paradigm of man as body and soul. According to the Pythagoreans the
human soul is immortal and divine, they believe that the soul has fallen,
and that is to say, imprisoned in the body. The imprisonment is not to
last forever since there is a sure possibility for the souls release from its
entrapment in the body.
He taught the doctrine of the transmigration of souls: human beings
had souls which were separable from their bodies, and at death a persons
soul might migrate into another kind of animal. For this reason, he taught his
disciples to abstain from meat; once, it is said, he stopped a man whipping a
puppy, claiming philosophy in its infancy to have recognized in its whimper
the voice of a dear dead friend. He believed that the soul, having migrated
into different kinds of animal in succession, was eventually reincarnated as a
human being. He himself claimed to remember having been, some centuries
earlier, a hero at the siege of Troy. The doctrine of the transmigration of souls
was called in Greek metempsychosis.
Socrates
Socrates was acclaimed as the greatest philosopher in Western
civilization. The definition of Socrates of man seems to put more emphasis on
the attitudinal level of human nature since he gives more value to the
human soul rather than the body. Socrates created the conception of the
soul, the psyche. For him the soul is not any particular faculty, nor was it
any special kind of substance; but was rather the capacity for intelligence
and character; it was a persons personality. Socrates identified the soul
with the normal powers of intelligence and character instead of as some
ghostly substance. The soul was the structure of personality. The activity of
the soul is to know. He argues that the human soul should be nurtured
properly through its acquisition of knowledge, wisdom and virtue.
For Socrates man should discover the truth, the truth about good
life, for it is in knowing the good life that man can act correctly. According to
Socrates, knowledge and virtue are not distinct from each other. For one to
do good one must have first and foremost known the good. Knowing what
is right means doing what is right. For according to Socrates moral
knowledge and virtue was one and the same thing. Hence, if one fails to do
that which one knows about, it follows that the claimant of this knowledge
does not actually know that which he claims he knows at all. So if one knows
cheating, telling lies, stealing, killing, adultery, and the like are bad acts but
one performs them anyway, it clearly shows that one is deeply ignorant.
Someone who really knew what it was right to do could not do wrong; if
anyone did what was wrong; it must be because he did not know what was
right. No one goes wrong on purpose, since everyone wants to lead a good
life and thus be happy. Those who do wrong unintentionally are in need
of instruction, not punishment. For Socrates, the main source of evil is
ignorance.
Some philosophers comment that the ignorance which Socrates refers
to is not the act itself but its ability to produce happiness. Wrongdoing is
the inaccurate estimate modes of behaviour. It is the inaccurate
expectation that certain kinds of things or pleasures will produce happiness.
Wrongdoing, then, is the product of ignorance simply because it is done with
the hope that it will do what it cannot do. Ignorance consists in not
knowing that certain behaviour cannot produce happiness. And it
requires knowledge to be able to distinguish what appears to give happiness
and what really does. Socrates denied that people deliberately did evil acts
because they knew them to be evil. When people commit evil acts, said
Socrates, they always do them thinking that they are good in some way. Even
when one chooses pain, one does so with the expectation that this pain will
lead to virtue.
Plato
Plato was a student of Socrates. There were yet no established schools
that existed before in ancient Greece. Socrates favourite schoolhouse was the
marketplace despite the fact that he was no vendor of any commodities,
except ideas. Plato founded a school in Athens which he called Academy.
Notably, Plato called this school in honour of the Greek hero Academus. This
school however, was ordered closed by the Catholic Church in 529 A.D.
Spiritual Part part of the soul that makes man assert abomination
and anger. It is the seat of emotions (i.e. anger, fear, hatred,
jealousy). It is located in the chest.
Rational Part it is the seat of reasoning. It is the rational part of
the soul that enables man to think, to reflect, to draw conclusions,
and to analyse. This part of the soul is located in the head. For Plato
this part of the soul is the most important and the highest. It
naturally desire to acquire knowledge and wisdom. It is this part that
rules over the other parts and not to be overruled. It is this part that
specifically distinguishes man from the brutes. Man can control his
appetite and self- assertion of spirit through reason.
For example, when the person is very hungry and yet, he does not eat
the available food because he knows or doubts that it has poison. Plato
contends that there is something in the mind of the person that leads him to
crave for food and another thing that prohibits him from eating the poisoned
food. The principle that drives the person to eat the food is what he calls the
appetite while that principle which forbids the person to eat the available
food because it is poisoned, is reason.
Another example is man who is so angry with another person who
insulted him. Out of anger, he surely would be driven to kill his enemy but
does not actually do so because he knows that if he does so, he will be
imprisoned. With the same reasoning, he argues that it is the spirit in man
that makes the person angry with his enemy, yet his anger is curbed by
reason.
A self-controlled person is a person who knows how to balance
things and is therefore dominated by the rational part. Reason for Plato
controls both spirit and appetite. When this happens man will have a wellbalanced personality. An aggressive person is a person who asserts himself
in all situations in life and is therefore dominated by the spirited part. A
greedy person is person who seeks to acquire possessions is therefore
dominated by the appetitive part.
Plato declares that the spiritual and appetitive parts are subjected to
death; they are mortals. Only the rational part of the soul is immortal. This
literally gives birth to the concept that an idea is immortal since it is rooted in
reason. This means further that when man dies, his soul will not go hungry or
angry, because passion and appetite die with the body, yet, whatever the
soul knows, it continues to know what it knows since an idea or knowledge is
intrinsically incapable of death. The universal concept of the human soul or
reason is eternal and will continue to exist. It will not die with the death of the
person.
Aristotle
If Plato has his academy, Aristotle has his Lyceum. It is in this school
where Aristotle gathered his disciples who sat at his feet. The most acclaimed
statement of Aristotle on man says: Man is a rational animal.
Unlike Plato, Aristotle maintains that there is no dichotomy between
mans body and soul. Body and soul are in a state of unity. For Aristotle
mans body and soul are substantially united. This means that in Aristotelian
thought, there is no soulless body and bodiless soul. Simply put, where
there is body there is soul, and vice versa. The soul acts as the perfect or full
realization of the body while the body is a material entity which has a
potentiality for life. The body per se, has no life. The body can only possess
life when it is united with the soul. Soul is the principle of life; it causes the
body to live. The body is matter to the soul and the soul form to the body.
Body and soul therefore, are inseparable. They constitute man as a whole.
For Aristotle it is not only human beings which have a soul, or psyche;
all living beings have one, from daisies and molluscs upwards. A soul is
simply a principle of life: it is the source of the characteristic activities of
living beings. Different living beings have different abilities: plants can grow
and reproduce, but cannot move or feel; animals perceive, and feel pleasure
and pain; some but not all animals can move around; some very special
animals, namely human beings, can also think and understand. Different
kinds of soul are diversified by these different activities in which they find
expression. The most general definition which Aristotle gives of a soul is that
it is the form of an organic body. Aristotles concept of the kinds of soul:
Vegetative Soul is the lowest type of soul which is found in all
living things. Plants specifically possess this type of soul. It is
capable of the following functions: It feeds (nutrition) itself, it grows
(growth), and it reproduces (reproduction). Man is a vegetant soul, a
vegetant organism. As a vegetant organism human beings are like
plants simply because they have life and they feed, grow and
reproduce themselves.
naturally. He also notes that people desire the good, and on the principle that
one desires what one doesnt already have, this shows that people are not
good. He gives several illustrations of what life is like in the state of nature,
without any education on ritual and morality. Xunzi does not believe that
people are evil, that they deliberately violate the rules of morality, taking a
perverse pleasure in doing so. They have no natural conception of morality at
all: they are morally blind by nature. Their desires bring them into conflict
because they dont know any better, not because they enjoy conflict. In fact,
Xunzi believes people do not enjoy it at all, which is why they desire the kind
of life that results from good order brought about through the rituals of the
sages.
Human nature is bad, but it is not incorrigible, and in fact Xunzi
was rather optimistic about the possibility of overcoming the demands of
desires that result in the state of nature. Though Xunzi believes that it is
always possible to reform oneself, he recognizes that in reality this will not
always happen. In most cases, the individual himself has to make the first
step in attempting to reform, and Xunzi is rather pessimistic about people
actually doing this. They cannot be forced to do so, and they may in practice
be unable to make the choice to improve, but for Xunzi, this does not mean
that in principle it is impossible for them to change.
Education
Because human nature is bad, Xunzi emphasizes the importance of
study in order to learn the Way. He compares the process of reforming ones
nature to making a pot out of clay or straightening wood with a press-frame.
Without the potter, the clay would never become a pot on its own. Similarly,
people will not be able to reform their nature without a teacher showing them
what to do. Xunzis concern is primarily moral education; he wants
people to develop into good people, not people who know a lot of
facts. He emphasizes the transformative aspect of education, where it
changes ones basic nature. Xunzi laid out a program of study based on
the works of the sages of the past that would teach proper ritual behaviour
and develop moral principles. He was the first to offer an organized Confucian
curriculum, and his curriculum became the blueprint for traditional education
in China until the modern period.
Practice was an important aspect of Xunzis course of education. A
student did not simply study ritual, he performed it. Xunzi recognized that
this performative aspect was crucial to the goal of transforming
ones nature. It was only through practice that one could realize the beauty
of ritual, ideally coming to appreciate it for itself. Though this was the end of
education, Xunzi appealed to more utilitarian motives to start the student on
the program of study. As noted above, he discussed how desires would
inevitably be frustrated in the state of nature. Organizing society through
ritual was the only way people could ever satisfy even some of their desires,
and study of ritual was the best way to achieve satisfaction on a personal
level. Through study and practice, one could learn to appreciate ritual for its
own sake, not just as a means to satisfy desires. Ritual has this power to
transform someones motives and character. The beginning student of ritual
is like a child learning to play the piano. Maybe she doesnt enjoy playing the
piano at first, but her parents take her out for ice cream after each lesson, so
she goes along with it because she gets what she wants. After years of study
and practice, she might learn to appreciate playing the piano for its own sake,
and will practice even without any reward. This is what Xunzi imagines will
happen to the dedicated student of ritual: he starts out studying ritual as a
means, but it becomes an end in itself as part of the Way.
The teacher plays an extremely important role in the course of
study. A good teacher does not simply know the rituals; he embodies them
and practices them in his own life. Just as one would not learn piano from
someone who had just read a book on piano pedagogy but never touched an
actual instrument, one should not study from someone who has only learned
texts. A teacher is not just a source of information; he is a model for
the student to look up to and a source of inspiration of what to
become. A teacher who does not live up to the Way of the sages in his own
life is no teacher at all. Xunzi believes there is no better method of study than
learning from such a teacher. In this way, the student has a model before of
him of how to live ritual principles, so his learning does not become simple
accumulation of facts. In the event that such a teacher is unavailable, the
next best method is to honour ritual principles sincerely, trying to embody
them in oneself. Without either of these methods, Xunzi believes learning
degenerates into memorizing a jumble of facts with no impact on ones
conduct.
Christian Thinkers
The Christian understanding of the human person is one of the most profound
reflections about human persons. The teaching of Christianity regarding man comes
from the Hebrew-Christian Scripture and Greek philosophy. It sees man in relation to
God and considers it as supreme among all other creation and yet morally
responsible for it. Two of the most influential philosopher-theologian will be
discussed here.
Augustine of Hippo
Thomas Aquinas
St. Thomas asserts that man is substantially united body and soul. Man is
the point of convergence between the corporeal and spiritual substances. In
other words, man is one substance body and soul. Man is a substantial
unity of body and soul. Man is an embodied soul, not a soul using a
body. The body must be united with something else which we call soul.
Animation according to Aquinas happens when the two become one. As
animation occurs, life instantly comes to the fore. Human life is understood
by Aquinas in his doctrine called participation. Through participation, God
allows human life to partake in the celebration of existence. Hence, in as
much as God is the author of life, He too has the sole power and authority to
shut the power of life. This is a doctrine Aquinas calls annihilation. It is God
alone for Aquinas, who has the sole authority to annihilate life. The human
body is animated by the soul specifically during conception. It is through
animation that the two become one.
The soul, the animator of human body, is a substance. It is incorporeal
(therefore immaterial) and spiritual. The soul possesses will and intellect (souls
faculty). The soul is unified with the body for its lower activity, i.e. sensation. A
soul cannot have perception in the absence of the body because perception
means sensation. Sensation can only be realized and possible in the context of a
body. The soul is limited because it needs the correlative function of a material
element called body. The soul is the principle of life of the body, the
principle of nourishment, and the principle of movement. Thus, the body
and soul are substantially united.
Although the body and the soul are substantially united, each retains its
own substantial identity because the soul is not the body and the body is not
the soul. The soul is united in the body not only because of perception, but also,
because it is the form of the body. A body can act only through the soul
because the soul is the principle of life of the body.
As long as there is human body, there is a soul (except in death, which is
only a temporary separation of body and soul which will be united again in the
last judgment.) Matter is subject to corruption, so a human body is subject to
corruption by necessity of its matter. On the other hand, because the soul is
immaterial it is free from corruption. This logically makes the soul immortal.
Because the soul is immortal its power or faculty such as intellect and will
remain in the soul after the destruction of the body. At death, the substantial
unity of body and soul ceases.
In sum, in Thomistic philosophy, man is substantially body and soul. The
soul is united with the human body because it is the substantial form of the
human body. It is the principle of action in the human body and it is the principle
of life of the body. The soul needs the body as the material medium for its
operation particularly perception. The function or faculties of the soul are:
intellect and will.
References: