Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Save Ganga Movement is a widespread Gandhian nonviolent movement supported by saints and popular social activists across the Indian States Uttar Pradesh and
Bihar in support of a free Ganga. The movement is
supported by Ganga Seva Abhiyanam, Pune-based National Womens Organisation (NWO) besides those of
many other like-minded organisations and with the moral
support from many religious leaders, spiritual and political, scientists, environmentalists, writers and social
activists.[1][2][3] Ganga Calling Save Ganga is another
such campaign supported by Indian Council for EnviroLegal Action (ICELA).
Causes
states. It is estimated that the livelihoods of over 500 million people in India are dependent upon the river, and that
one-third of Indias population lives within the Ganges
Basin. Despite this magnitude of inuence and control
by the river over present and future of the country, it is
allegedly under direct threat from various man made and
natural environmental issues.
1.1 Pollution
Ganga Dashahara in 2005 brought throngs of bathers to the
riverfront in Haridwar. (Religious association of Ganga also accounts for an appreciable degree of pollution.)
through domestic usage like bathing, laundry and public defecation. Countless tanneries, chemical plants, textile mills, distilleries, slaughterhouses, and hospitals contribute to the pollution of the Ganges by dumping untreated toxic and non-biodegradable waste into it.[5][6]
It is this sheer volume of pollutants released into the
river every day that are causing irreparable damage to
the ecosystem and contributing to signicant sanitation
issues.
MOVEMENT
2 Background
Global warming
3.2 Activists
3.2.1 Acharya Jitendra
1.4
3
to give up his fast within 24 hours. In 2010 Again
Acharya Jitendra played a crucial role to stop the Loharinag Pala Hydel Project On The Ganga. As K.N. Govindacharya said he worked behind the scenes for three
years, interfacing with people and like Baba Ramdev
and Acharya Jitendra, environmentalists and politicians
of all hues. He even approached senior Congress leaders for their support. When a favourable atmosphere
was created, he met Pranab Mukherjee, leading a delegation of the Ganga Mahasabha. He then spoke to senior Vishva Hindu Parishad leader Ashok Singhal and the
Bharatiya Janata Partys Rajnath Singh, who persuaded
CM Ramesh Pokhriyal to write to the PM, asking him to
scrap the Loharinag Pala project.[20]
3.2.2
Nigamanand
3.2.3
Prof. G. D. Agrawal
4 Demands
The movement is solely aimed at one goal to prevent
the anti-nature, anti-human, anti-environment activities
against Ganges and sustain the cultural importance, holiness and age old heritage of the same. Though most
of the demands are directly related to the pollution and
construction works overs Ganges, there are ought to be
several demands related indirectly to these.
4.1 No construction
It is demanded that the Upper course of Ganges should
be strictly disallowed any kind of damning and construction work.[24] It should be declared a Wild River zone and
visits by tourists and people to Gangotri National Park
should also be regulated and toned down. Eco-friendly
tourism should replace the present eco-hostile tourism.
Time-bound steps for non-commercial aorestation of
the Uttarakhand should be undertaken and these activities should be carried by the local people, using samplings
of local plants.[25] This demand was backed by a recent
report prepared by the state-funded Wildlife Institute of
India that recommended scrapping 34 of the Ganges dam
projects, citing environmental concerns.[24]
6 CONTROVERSIES
garbage and rotten stu. Animal loitering on ghats, trou- 4.5 Monitoring committee
bling the residents and devotees is the other problem.[26]
It is necessary to frame some rules and guidelines for the It is demanded that a committee of experts to monitor
Civic authorities and municipalities to carry out a sched- the progress of the governmental course of actions in this
uled and continued cleaning eort from the concerned direction should be appointed. It should report all of its
ndings and actions to the Supreme Court of India which
ocials.
direct the Central and State Governments.
4.3
Industrialization control
5 Governments eorts
5.1 Panel to review projects on Ganges
6 Controversies
5
the agitation. It raised rumours of having this meet
up between the two to be xed.[29]
Present status
Notes
[21] Dube, Priyanka (14 June 2011). Sadhu dies after a 73day fast to save Ganga. ibnlive.in.com. CNN-IBN. Retrieved 14 June 2011. Swami Nigamanand
[22] Shivanand breaks fast after forcing curb on Ganga bed
quarrying
[23] Save Ganga activist GD Agarwal ends fast
[24] Indian 'sadhus protest dam projects on holy Ganges.
The malay mail. 18 June 2012. Retrieved 2 July 2012.
[25] Charter of 10 Demands. Retrieved 29 June 2012.
[26] Ganga ghats in miserable condition. The Times of India.
26 June 2012. Retrieved 2 July 2012.
[27] Govt mulls panel to check impact of dams on Ganga.
Hindutan Times. 19 June 2012. Retrieved 2 July 2012.
[28] Government sets up panel to review power projects on
Ganga. The Times of India. 26 June 2012. Retrieved 2
July 2012.
[29] Controversies start with pause given to movement. The
Times of India. 30 June 2012. Retrieved 2 July 2012.
[30] nands potest for uninterrupted and clean Ganga halted
for 3 months. The Times of India. 30 June 2012. Retrieved 2 July 2012.
9 External links
ICELA
Tribune India
Tehelka
10
10
10.1
10.2
Images
10.3
Content license