Form 1.

0
REPORT ON RANKING OF SCHOOLS
Department of Education
Region (secondary) / Division (elementary):
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3

Summary of Information Required

Total No. of Schools: __________
Total No. of Officials and Employees Entitled to PBB: __________
Total Amount of Required for Payment of PBB: __________

2.0

Ranking of Schools

Ranking
2.1

School ID

Name of School

Rate of
Accomplishment
of Targets1
(in%)

Top 1.5%
(Level 8)

TOTAL LEVEL 8:
2.2

Next 3.75%
(Level 7)

TOTAL LEVEL 7:
2.3

Next 3.0%
(Level 6)

No. of Employees
Entitled to PBB

TOTAL LEVEL 6:
2.4

Next 6.5%
(Level 5)

TOTAL LEVEL 5:
2.5

Next 7.5%
(Level 4)

2.6

Next 21.75%
(Level 3)

TOTAL LEVEL 4:

TOTAL LEVEL 3:
2.7

Next 13.75%
(Level 2)

TOTAL LEVEL 2:
2.8

Next 42.25%
(Level 1)

TOTAL LEVEL 1:
1

Total Score

Annex 5

Amount of PBB
for each
Employee

Allocation

Department of Education
Performance-Based Bonus
Performance Review and Evaluation Template
School Level
Fiscal Year 2013
School Profile

Region

Division

District

Number of Eligible Employees

School ID

Name of
School

Teaching
Personnel

NonTeaching
Personnel

TeachingRelated
Personnel

% of learners who scored

average and better in NAT
or its equivalent

Total

SY 2011-2012

SY 2012-2013

Simple Dropout Rate

SY 2011-2012

SY 2012-2013

% of liquidation of school MOOE from January 1 to

December 31, 2013 and timeliness of submission of
liquidation reports as of the 5th working day of the
succeeding month

Amount
Allocated for
FY 2013

Amount
Liquidated
FY 2013

% Liquidation
of MOOE

0.0

No. of Late
Monthy
Reports

Plus Factor

Best
Implementor
of Brigada
Eskwela
SY 2012-2013
(Yes/No)

us Factor

Recipient of
national
award/
recognition
SY 2012-2013
(Yes/No)

% of learners who scored average and

better in NAT or its equivalent

(Difference)

0.00

Additional
Points

0.00

Weight
(35)

0.00

Simple Dropout Rate

(Difference)

0.00

Additional
Points

0.00

% of liquidation of school MOOE from

January 1 to December 31, 2013 and
timeliness of submission of liquidation
reports as of the 5th working day of the
succeeding month
Weight
(35)

0.00

% Liquidation
of MOOE

0.00

Timeliness

0.00

Plus Factor

Total Score

Commulative
Population

Percentile

Performance Amount of PBB per Total PBB Allocation

Category
Eligible Employee
per School

Weight
(30)

0.00

0.00

0.00

#REF!

#REF!

#REF!

#REF!

INSTRUCTIONS:
1.
2.
3.

Classify the schools according to school size based on the criteria on the classification of schools
Use a separate School Level PRET for each school classification/category (small, medium, large).
Fill out the required data/information in the School Level PRET. For columns which already have f
The following table serves as a guide on the specific data/information that each column should c

Column
School Profile
Column A
Column B
Column C
Column D
Column E
Number of Eligible Employees
Column F
Column G
Column H
Column I
Indicator No. 1: % of learners who scored average and better in NAT or its equivalent
Column J

Column K

Indicator No. 2: Simple dropout rate

Column L
Column M

Indicator No. 3: % of liquidation of school MOOE from January 1 to December 31, 2013
Column N
Column O

Column P

Column Q

Plus Factor
Column R

Column S

Formula-Based Computation Columns (Columns U-AK)

Columns U-W

Columns X-Z

Columns AA-AC

Column AD

Column AE
Column AG
Column AH

Column AI
Column AJ
Column AK

4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

All formula-based columns should be copied up to the end row or last row of school.
After filling out all the required fields in the School Level PRET, sort the Total Scores (Column AB)
This procedure will rank the schools based on their total scores from the three indicators.

The template will automatically show the Performance Category (Column AF) of each school, Am
After conducting the School Level Ranking, transfer the results from the School Level PRET to Fo

Using Annex 8 of DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014, the RPREC should officially submit the consolidat

UCTIONS:

the schools according to school size based on the criteria on the classification of schools specified under provisi
parate School Level PRET for each school classification/category (small, medium, large).
he required data/information in the School Level PRET. For columns which already have formula, copy the formu
wing table serves as a guide on the specific data/information that each column should contain.
Description

Profile

Name of Region
Name of Division
Name of District
School ID
Name of School
r of Eligible Employees
Teaching Personnel
Non-Teaching Personnel
Teaching-Related Personnel
Total No. of Eligible Employees
or No. 1: % of learners who scored average and better in NAT or its equivalent
% of learners who scored average and better in NAT or its equivalent for SY 2011-2012

% of learners who scored average and better in NAT or its equivalent for SY 2012-2013

or No. 2: Simple dropout rate

Simple dropout rate for SY 2011-2012
Simple dropout rate for SY 2012-2013

or No. 3: % of liquidation of school MOOE from January 1 to December 31, 2013 and timeliness of su
Amount Allocated for FY 2013
Amount Liquidated

% Liquidation of MOOE

No. of Late Monthy Reports

ctor
Best Implementor of Brigada Eskwela SY 2012-2013 (Yes/No)

Recipient of national award/recognition SY 2012-2013 (Yes/No)

a-Based Computation Columns (Columns U-AK)

Computation for Indicator No. 1
(% of learners who scored average and better in NAT or its equivalent)

Computation for Indicator No. 2

(simple dropout rate)

Computation for Indicator No. 3

(% of liquidation of school MOOE from January 1 to December 31, 2013 and timeliness of
submission of liquidation reports as of the 5th working day of the succeeding month)

Plus Factor

Total Score
Commulative Population
Percentile

Performance Category
Amount of PBB per Eligible Employee
Total PBB Allocation per School

ula-based columns should be copied up to the end row or last row of school.
ng out all the required fields in the School Level PRET, sort the Total Scores (Column AB) from highest to lowest.
cedure will rank the schools based on their total scores from the three indicators.

plate will automatically show the Performance Category (Column AF) of each school, Amount of PBB per Eligible
nducting the School Level Ranking, transfer the results from the School Level PRET to Form 1.0 or Report on Ran

nnex 8 of DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014, the RPREC should officially submit the consolidated Forms 1.0 or Reports

pecified under provision no. 15 (b) of DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014.

mula, copy the formula up to the end row or last row of school.
tain.
Remarks

NOTE: Under provision no. 10 (d) of DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014, "all elementary and secondary scho
which have school ID, and have operated and completed at least one (1) school year as of March 31, 2
"...shall be treated as separate delivery units. Annex and extension schools, which do not have school
2014, shall be included in the mother schools." Hence, all schools which should be included in the ran
should observe the said criteria.

NOTE: All school personnel who should be included in this column and be entitled to 2013 PBB should
under provision no. 11 (a-f) of DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014. Column I is the total of Columns F-H. It alr
automatically compute for the sum. The committee should sum up the total eligible employees per sc
bottom of the row.

Data/information required in this column should be encoded in number (NOT IN %) format.

Operationally, the quartile distribution in the overall test in NAT is used, computed as the percentage
'Upper Average' and 'Superior' quartiles.

Data/information for the % of learners who scored average and better in NAT (G3, G6, Y4), SReYA and
by the NPREC through the RPREC. For schools which do not have data on these, use the general avera
highest grade level offering.

NOTE: Per DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014, "for elementary, in the absence of NAT G6, use NAT G3 or the
Assessment (SReYA) or the general average of pupils in the highest grade level offering, in that order.
absence of NAT Y4, use NCAE-GSA or the general average of students in the highest year level offerin

Data/information required in this column should be encoded in number (NOT IN %) format. Data/inform
be provided by the NPREC through the RPREC.

nd timeliness of submission of liquidation reports as of the 5th working day of the succeeding mon
This column should contain the total amount of MOOE allocated for the school for the year 2013 (Janu
This column should contain the total amount of MOOE liquidated by the school for the year 2013.

This column already has formula which will automatically compute for the % liquidation of MOOE. Cop
or last row of school. The computation of % liquidation should be:
____Amount Liquidated (col O)_____
Amount Allocated for FY 2013 (col N)

NOTE: Per DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014, "For schools with no MOOE due to failure in liquidating MOOE
For newly established schools with yet no allocation of MOOE, use the liquidation data of LGU-funds (c
For school annexes and extensions with MOOE attached to the mother school, use the liquidation data

This column should contain the number of monthly liquidation report/s submitted late to the division o
determining the late submission, the reckoning date should be the day that the liquidation reports are
which should be as of the 5th working day of the succeeding month.

Input 'Yes' if the school is awarded as Best Implementor of Brigada Eskwela in the national level in SY
Order No. 33, s. 2014 enumerates the Best Implementing Schools of Brigada Eskwela in SY 2012-2013
Input 'No' if otherwise.

Input 'Yes' if the school is a recipient of national awards/recognitions in SY 2012-13 from award-giving
DepEd.
Input 'No' if otherwise.

This computation is based on the computation specified under provision no. 15(g) of DepEd Order No.
following have been followed:

- If the school has 80% of its learners scoring average and better in NAT or its equivalent, the school a
points for this indicator (35 points), regardless of the increase/decrease from the previous year.

- If the school has less than 80% of its learners scoring average and better in NAT or its equivalent, th
computed as: %SY2012-2013 x 35 plus additional points. Additional points are equivalent to each per
learners who scored average and better in NAT or its equivalent. However, a decline in the % is not gi

- Operationally, the quartile distribution in the overall test in NAT is used, computed as the percentage
'Upper Average' and 'Superior' quartiles.

-For elementary, in the absence of NAT G6, use NAT G3 or the School Readiness Year-End Assessment
of pupils in the highest grade level offering, in that order.

- For secondary, in the absence of NAT Y4, use NCAE-GSA or the general average of students in the hi
order.

This computation is based on the computation specified under provision no. 15(g) of DepEd Order No.
following have been followed:

- If the school has a simple dropout rate of 1% and below, the school automatically gets the maximum
points), regardless of the increase/decrease from the previous year.

- If the school has a simple dropout rate of more than 1% but less than 10%, the score for this indicato
10 - simple dropout rate x 35 plus additional points
10

- Additional points are equivalent to each percentage decrease in the simple dropout rate. However, a
rate is not given any deduction in points.

This computation is based on the computation specified under provision no. 15(g) of DepEd Order No.
following have been followed:

- The 30 points allocated for this indicator is distributed to the % liquidation of school MOOE (20 point
of liquidation reports as of the 5th working day of the succeeding month (10 points).

- Liquidation of school MOOE below 90% is automatically given 0 points in this item. For schools with %
90% and above, the score for this item is computed as: (%liquidation - 90) x 2
- Timeliness of submission of liquidation reports is computed as: 10 - (2 x no. of late monthly reports)
- Total score for this indicator will be computed by adding up the scores for the two items.

This computation is based on the computation specified under provision no. 15(g) of DepEd Order No.
following have been followed:

- Additional 1 point is given if the school achieved any of the two (2) criteria enumerated under provis
33, s. 2014, for a maximum of 1 point.

- Point in the plus factor is on top of the scores from the three indicators. Operationally, the point in th
score from the three indicators to get the total score, which will determine the performance category

The total score of each school is computed by getting the sum of the scores of the three indicators an

The commulative population is needed to determine which schools will fall under certain performance
This column shows the percentile group by which each school falls under. This will be the basis for det
Category of each school.

Operationally, the formula divides the commulative population (Column AD) by the total of eligible em

This column shows the rank or performance category by which each school falls under.
This column shows the amount of PBB incentive that each eligible employee in each school is entitled
This column shows the total PBB allocation of each school based on the performance category and nu

om highest to lowest. This can be done by pressing the drop-down button in Cell AB9 and selecting 'Sort Larges

nt of PBB per Eligible Employee (Column AG) and Total PBB Allocation per School (Column AH).
1.0 or Report on Ranking of Schools. This form is also enclosed in DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014 as Annex 5.

Forms 1.0 or Reports on Ranking of Schools for both elementary and secondary schools to the NPREC on or bef