Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
THERMAL
ENERGY
CONVERSION
(OTEC):
Presentation
Outline
* Introduction
* Chronological
Review
of
Major
Events
*
*
*
*
* Q&A session
Introduction:
What
is
OTEC?
[As
dened
by
US
Public
Law
96-310
on
July
17,
1980]
Method
of
converting
part
of
the
heat
from
the
Sun
which
is
stored
in
the
surface
layers
of
a
body
of
water
into
electrical
energy
or
energy
product
equivalent.
[Closed-Cycle
Shown]
Introduction:
The
Resource
Picture
from
OTEC.org
Introduction:
What
is
Required?
Heat
Source
Deep
Cold
Water
(Heat
Sink)
Accessibility
of
Resources
&
Demand
for
Energy
Introduction:
Type
of
Systems
Closed-Cycle
[Technically
&
economically
feasible
today
at
commercial
scale
10
to
75
MW]
Open-Cycle
Hybrid-Cycle
[Requires
more
R&D
less
than
1
MW;
Co-produces
water]
Introduction:
OTEC
Evaluation
Criteria
Evaluation
of
OTEC
as
a
commercial
option
should
focus
on
the
following
points:
* Technical
viability
(engineering/design,
o-the-shelf
equipment,
deployment/construction)
* Environmental
impact
* Economics
(competitive
cost
of
electricity
versus
fossil
fuels
such
as
oil)
* Appropriate
nancing
strategy
and
structure
(utility
project)
* Baseload
versus
intermittent
electric
power
production
Introduction:
OTEC
Evaluation
Criteria
(cont.)
The
Importance
of
Baseload
Power
Generation
(ENR
2011)
even
wind,
geothermal
and
solar
energy
supporters
say
they
cannot
replace
the
massive
baseload
power
provided
by
nuclear,
natural
gas
and
coal.
solar
farms
could
not
produce
electricity
24
hours
a
day,
as
coal,
gas
or
nuclear
can.
Introduction:
OTEC
Evaluation
Criteria
(cont.)
* OTEC
is
a
baseload
viable
technology
(closed-cycle
50-75
MW;
hybrid-cycle
1-5
MW)
* OTEC
uses
no
fuel
* Eciency
or
capital
cost
are
important
but
do
not
represent
the
economic
bottom-line
* OTEC
cost
of
electricity
is
competitive
(closed
cycle;
nal
$/kW-h
depends
on
size
due
to
economies
of
scale,
location/market,
nancing
specics,
contract
terms
&
conditions,
etc.)
* Equipment
for
closed-cycle
system
is
commercially
available
(o-the-shelf)
* Safe
operation
with
minimal
environmental
impacts
* Reliable
operation
with
minimum
maintenance
* Platform
and/or
cold
water
pipe
construction/deployment
similar
to
the
marine
and
other
related
industries
* Low
pressures
and
temperatures
of
OTEC
process
represent
lower
equipment
cost
compared
to
high
P/T
of
other
similar
energy
sources
Introduction:
OTEC
Social
&
Environmental
Impact
* No
fuel
needed
One 100-MW plant can save 1,300,000 bbl per year or $130 MM per year (@ $100/bbl)
One
100-MW
plant
can
save
500,000
tons
of
CO2
per
year
or
$15
MM
per
year
(@
$30/
ton
Carbon
Credit)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
No
solid
wastes
Discharge
essentially
similar
to
ambient
water
Can
concurrently
produce
potable
water
(hybrid
or
open-cycle)
Stable
supply
(not
vulnerable
to
external
factors)
Very
high
availability
factor
(>85%)
Cost
is
known
and
xed
from
day
1
(very
low
volatility)
Public
is
very
receptive
to
idea,
once
the
basic
principle
is
understood
Baseload
electricity
(available
24/7/365)
Introduction:
OTEC
Risks
* Thermal
uid
system
leak
Ammonia
proven
safety/environmental
record;
OSHA
PSM;
EPA
RMP
* Upwelling
eect
Occurs
naturally
in
various
sites
worldwide;
most
famous
site
is
in
Perus
o-coast
in
the
Pacic;
to
be
avoided
in
rst
plant;
combined
discharge
just
below
the
photic
zone
to
match
conditions
of
receiving
body
Introduction:
OTEC
Risks
(cont.)
* All
potential
issues
can
be
avoided,
controlled
and/or
mitigated
during
system
design,
industry
standards,
engineering
best
practices
and/or
through
preventive
measures
during
operation
* Environmental
impact
assessments
and
strict
permitting
process
required
by
both
PR
and
EEUU
(NOAA,
EPA,
EQB,
etc.)
* First
plant
to
include
program
to
study
long-term
environmental
eects
during
operation
UPR
recommended
as
partner
Every
energy
source
pollutes
some
do
so
badly
and
some
not
so
badly,
but
all
do.
Editor-in-Chief,
Journal
of
the
Association
of
Energy
Engineers,
2011
Introduction:
Use
of
Technology
to
Mitigate
Risks
Oceanography
* 1980:
JHU/APL
prepared
preliminary
design
for
DOE
for
both
Hawaii
and
Puerto
Rico
Gross
Power:
52
MWe,
Net
Power:
40
MWe
Floating/Moored
Platform
(Puerto
Rico),
Grazing
NH3
Plantship
(Hawaii)
Closed-Cycle
with
NH3
Two
HX
Modules:
Folded-Tube
and
PHE;
Interchangeable
Modules
HX
Installation:
On-Platform
1980:
A
conference
is
conducted
in
Maunabo
to
explain
OTEC
and
its
environmental
impact
(Sponsored
by
UPR
Sea
Grant
Program
and
UPR
Mayaguez
CEER)
PREPAS
40
MW
Plant
Proposal
to
DOE
in
1981
PREPAS
40
MW
Plant
Proposal
to
DOE
in
1981
(cont.)
Key
Statements:
PREPA
as
prime
contractor
Turn-key
project
Safety,
O&M
and
environmental
factors
considered
Novel
approach
to
deployment
of
tower
and
CWP
Project
depended
on
Federal
support
PREPAS
40
MW
Plant
Proposal
to
DOE
in
1981
(cont.)
Key
Statements:
No
fuel
needed
(free
ocean
energy)
Correlation
between
OTEC
and
economic
growth,
new
industries
and
job
creation
PREPAS
40
MW
Plant
Proposal
to
DOE
in
1981
(cont.)
Proposal
considered
and
emphasized
on
two
major
aspects:
World-wide
unique
characteristics
of
Punta
Tuna
in
terms
of
thermal
and
cold
deep
water
resources,
its
proximity
to
shore,
as
well
as
oceanography
and
bathymetry
related
prole
and
advantages
One
of
the
best
documented
OTEC
sites
in
the
world
PREPAS
40
MW
Plant
Proposal
to
DOE
in
1981
(cont.)
40-MW
electric
power
generation
Jacket-type
xed
tower
in
300
feet
of
water
1
to
2
miles
to
shore
Modularized
power
system
(10
MW
each
module)
Closed
cycle
ammonia
power
system
Near
bottom
mounted
shell
&
tube
titanium
heat
exchangers
for
(1)
minimum
loading
on
tower,
(2)
wave
and
hurricane
protection
and
(3)
process
performance
3,000
feet
CWP
considered
at
the
time
as
the
biggest
challenge
PREPAS
40
MW
Plant
Proposal
to
DOE
in
1981
(cont.)
A
vision
for
Puerto
Rico
Hard
to
believe,
many
would
argue,
that
PREPA
did
have
an
economic
development
vision
for
Puerto
Rico
almost
35
years
ago
based
on
short,
medium
and
long
term
commercialization
goals
of
OTEC
PREPAS
proposal
was
not
just
to
generate
power,
IT
WAS
AN
INTEGRATED
AND
VISIONARY
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
FOR
PUERTO
RICO
PHASE
PUERTO RICO
I
1986-1990
FIRST MINIMUM SIZE
COMMERCIAL PLANTS
(10, 20, 40 & 50 MW)
TEST
OPERATE
II
1990-1996
FIRST LARGE SIZE
COMMERCIAL PLANTS
(100 & 300 MW)
III
1996-2010
MULTIPLE OTEC POWER PLANTS
LAND & NEAR SHORE
(400 MW)
IV
2010-2030
ADDITIONAL OTEC PLANTS
AT SEA & GRAZING
MODULE
MODULE
MODULE
OTEC principal PR
electric power source
Offshore out of sight (25 miles)
moored plants
Grazing OTEC plant ships based in PR
MODULE
CARIBBEAN &
INTERNATIONAL
SMALL SIZE
PLANTS
Developing Island Nations
(Caribbean & World)
DOD & Isolated Industrial Sites
MODULE
PREPAS
40
MW
Plant
Proposal
to
DOE
in
1981
(cont.)
Fluor
Daniel
published
Feasibility
Study
of
an
100
MW
OTEC
ASCE
published
Conceptual
Design
of
an
Open
Cycle
OTEC
Plant
for
Production
of
Electricity
and
Water
(1989)
Plant
for
SSP
(1989)
An
Energy
Solution
for
PR
video
is
launched
by
OIA
with
over
349,000
views
in
YouTube
since
2007
Proposal
to
PREPA
for
75
MW
OTEC
plant
is
submitted
by
OIA
(2007)
Multiple
conferences
across
the
Island
to
raise
awareness
and
educate
about
OTEC
and
its
benets
to
Puerto
Rico
PREPAs
strategic
plan
including
OIAs
proposal
to
develop
OTEC
(Caribbean
Business
on
March
12,
2009)
ANL
Workshop
Washington
DC
2007
NOAA-UNH
Workshops
2009
&
2010
Energy
Ocean
International
2009
Energy
Ocean
International
2010
R&D
Activities:
Aluminum
Corrosion
and
Biocorrosion
Testing
Interactive
OTEC
Power
Atlas
Federal
government
(and
other
nations)
stopped
most
funding
for
OTEC
research
in
mid
1980s
1990s
Puerto
Rico
1985:
98%
oil-red,
2%
renewable
(hydro)
2006:
~73.1%
oil-red,
~12.8%
natural
gas,
~13.6%
carbon,
~0.5%
renewable
(hydro)
2013:
In
2013,
55%
oil-red,
28%
natural
gas,
16%
coal,
1%
from
renewable
(solar,
wind
&
hydro)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Use
OTEC
2nd
and
3rd
generation
plants
to
produce
energy-intensive
green
chemicals
such
as
Hydrogen,
NH3,
Methanol,
Nitrogen,
Oxygen
and
CO2
Attract
other
industries
for
manufacturing
products
that
required
these
green
chemicals
as
raw
materials
Export
these
green
chemicals
to
the
Caribbean,
US
and
the
world
Actions
that
can
be
taken
today
* First
commercial
plant
(>50
MW)
in
Punta
Tuna
(closed-cycle,
electric
power
only)
PPA
with
PREPA
or
PPP
(4-5
years
development
engineering/design,
permitting/licensing,
procurement,
construction/deployment,
start-up
and
operation)
* Parallel,
a
demonstration
or
pilot
plant
(1-5
MW)
in
Punta
Tuna
(hybrid
cycle,
electric
power
and
water)
PPA
with
PRASA
or
PPP
(3-4
years
development)
integrate
UPR
* Pass
two
state
laws,
one
for
OTEC
commercialization
and
development,
and
one
for
regulatory
framework
(similar
to
PL
96-310
and
PL
96-320)
Treat
OTEC
as
a
top
economic
development
priority
Formulate
(and
implement)
bold
strategy
and
integrate
both
public
sector
(DDEC,
PRIDCO,
OEPPE,
etc.)
and
private
sector
(CIAPR,
etc.)
* Develop the rst Puerto Rico OTEC/DOW R&D and Center of Excellence
PSTRT to lead and nance eorts in collaboration with UPR and private sector
The End
Remember
WE
HAVE
A
UNIQUE
OPPORTUNITY
TO
CHANGE
THE
GAME
TO
ACHIEVE
LONG-
TERM
GROWTH
AND
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
FOR
PUERTO
RICO
Q&A
Session
Email:
laboy.manuel@rocketmail.com