Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
TC Ruling
TC relied on the testimony of Detective
Albano, who claimed all soldiers admitted to
participating in the shooting. SC, however,
found inconsistencies
1. Not one of the soldiers made a written
statement confirming the alleged
admission
2. Albano made no mention of the
alleged admission in his written report
submitted to the fiscal's office
3. The transcript shows that Albano did
not ask the soldiers individually if each
had participated in the shooting, but
simply addressed the question to them
as a group.
ISSUES/HELD/RATIO
1. W/N the soldiers presence at the Sayo
residence was in pursuance of a conspiracy
NO
They were there upon orders of a
superior officer and in the performance
of the assignment given to them.
However, the shooting itself was preceded by
circumstances which show that they acted
in unity.
When Tiongson shouted "Alex," Guieb and
Alicante came out and deployed in front
of the Sayo residence
When Tiongson said "sige, tirahin mo na"
and fired the 1st shot the soldiers
followed suit with a hail of bullets
Given that, Guieb and Alicantes version
is far from convincing. The situation could
not possibly have given Guieb and Alicante
cause to believe that they were being
attacked.
The clear evidence for the prosecution is
that Arceo and the 3 Lopez brothers were
not mere figures in the dark just
before the shooting.
Tiongson was herding them in the middle
of the street in plain view of Guieb and
Alicante.