Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Name: ____Mary Peabody_______ Date. July 5th,2015 . Obt. Pts 52/ __34___ %15/__9.8___ Grade 100/___65____
Developin
g
Accomplishe
d
Exemplary
1-2 pts
o
3-4
pts
5-6 pts
7-8pts
Comments
You did include more than 40 points
but the exam only has two main
sections.
Please double check on
transparency, practicality. These to
cornerstones should be more
present.
Mary, I added several comments in
regards to this section. I really want
to encourage you to work on this
particular criterion. Each section
should have its separate set of
instructions.
The items designed had an evident communicative purpose where
students have specific context, and meaning making is required.
All items designed were challenging enough, including, when necessary,
extra options, paraphrasing, or any other strategy to avoid giving away the
right answer.
The test included complete answer key and the corresponding audios. The
images and texts included were clear to understand (in terms of quality of
images, font side and type, etc).
Audios, texts, grammar and vocabulary, and the exam in general were
authentic texts or situations were the target language/content could be
used.
The listening part took into account listening conventions such as not
asking for answers said within the first 30 seconds, providing three options
in case of MCQ, playing the recording twice, and any other studied in class
or included in the readings.
There were variety of formats used, allowing students to demonstrate
knowledge through different skills and items (for example, not only gap
filling, not only identify items, etc).
The vocabulary and grammar items were designed avoiding biased
responses or give-away answer. This was assured by compiling all the item
design conventions discussed in class and within the reading (such as
apple and oranges, one extra option in TRUE and FALSE, not overlap of
content, etc)
The reading items were designed avoiding biased responses or give-away
answer. This was assured by compiling all the item design conventions
discussed in class and within the reading (such as using paraphrasing to
promote meaning making, writing items in the same order as answers are
found in the reading, etc).
The rationale was at least one page (no more than two) long and included
an analysis of each of the parts of the exam, explaining why an specific
item was chosen (in terms of content or objectives), why was an specific
text chosen, or any other aspect that the participants considers is
necessary to explain.
o
I think items may be too challenging
for less abstract minds.
o
o
N/A
This is one of the criterions I really
encourage you to pay attention to,
specially because your exam mostly
focuses on production (essay and
short answer)
1-2 pts
3-4
pts
5-6 pts
7-8pts