Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.
53 / Tuesday, March 18, 2008 / Notices 14485
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at http://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
7, 2008, the Commission determined
that it should proceed to full reviews in
the subject five-year reviews pursuant to
section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The
Commission found that the domestic
interested party group response to its
notice of institution (72 FR 67962,
December 3, 2007) was adequate and
that the respondent interested party
group response was inadequate. The
Commission also found that other
circumstances warranted conducting
full reviews. A record of the
Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy,
and any individual Commissioner’s
statements will be available from the
Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 12, 2008.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–5391 Filed 3–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[USITC SE–08–005]
Government in the Sunshine Act
Meeting Notice
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United
States International Trade Commission.
TIME AND DATE: March 20, 2008 at 9 a.m.
PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, Telephone:
(202) 205–2000.
STATUS: Open to the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
2. Minutes.
3. Ratification List.
4. Inv. No. 731–TA–749 (Second
Review) (Persulfates from China)—
briefing and vote. (The Commission is
currently scheduled to transmit its
determination and Commissioners’
opinions to the Secretary of Commerce
on or before March 31, 2008.)
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
In accordance with Commission
policy, subject matter listed above, not
disposed of at the scheduled meeting,
may be carried over to the agenda of the
following meeting.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:39 Mar 17, 2008 Jkt 214001
Issued: March 12, 2008.
By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. E8–5347 Filed 3–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1110 (Final)]
Sodium Hexametaphosphate From
China
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigation, the United
States International Trade Commission
(Commission) determines, pursuant to
section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an
industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of imports
from China of sodium
hexametaphosphate, provided for in
subheadings 2835.39.50 and 3824.90.39
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States, that have been found
by the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) to be sold in the United
States at less than fair value (LTFV).2
Background
The Commission instituted this
investigation effective February 8, 2007,
following receipt of a petition filed with
the Commission and Commerce by ICL
Performance Products, LP, St. Louis,
MO, and Innophos, Inc., Cranbury, NJ.
The final phase of the investigation was
scheduled by the Commission following
notification of a preliminary
determination by Commerce that
imports of sodium hexametaphosphate
from China were being sold at LTFV
within the meaning of section 733(b) of
the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of
the scheduling of the final phase of the
Commission’s investigation and of a
public hearing to be held in connection
therewith was given by posting copies
of the notice in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, Washington, DC, and by
publishing the notice in the Federal
Register of October 31, 2007 (72 FR
61677). The hearing was held in
Washington, DC, on January 24, 2008,
and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR § 207.2(f)).
2 Commissioner Dean A. Pinkert did not
participate in this investigation.
PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
The Commission transmitted its
determination in this investigation to
the Secretary of Commerce on March 12,
2008. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 3984
(March 2008), entitled Sodium
Hexametaphosphate from China:
Investigation No. 731–TA–1110 (Final).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 12, 2008.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–5392 Filed 3–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1103–NEW]
Office of Community Oriented Policing
Services; Agency Information
Collection Activities: Proposed
Collection; Comments Requested
ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: Situational
Policing Officer and Neighborhood
Survey.
The Department of Justice (DOJ)
Office of Community Oriented Policing
Services (COPS) will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The revision of
a currently approved information
collection is published to obtain
comments from the public and affected
agencies.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
for 30 days for public comment until
April 17, 2008. This process is
conducted in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Rebekah Dorr,
Department of Justice Office of
Community Oriented Policing Services,
1100 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
18MRN1