Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1NC
Drones provide effective surveillance of the borders
Spagat 2014 (Elliot; Drones replacing officers in Mexican border surveillance;
Nov 13; www.dailynews.com/social-affairs/20141113/drones-replacing-officers-inmexican-border-surveillance; kdf)
The U.S. government now patrols nearly half the Mexican border by drones alone in a
largely unheralded shift to control desolate stretches where there are no agents, camera towers, ground sensors or
It represents a significant
departure from a decades-old approach that emphasizes boots on the ground and
fences. Since 2000, the number of Border Patrol agents on the 1,954-mile border more than doubled to
fences, and it plans to expand the strategy to the Canadian border.
surpass 18,000 and fencing multiplied nine times to 700 miles. Under the new approach, Predator B aerial
drones, used in the fight against insurgents in Afghanistan, sweep remote mountains, canyons and rivers with a
high-resolution video camera and return within three days for another video in the same spot, two officials with
direct knowledge of the effort said on condition of anonymity because details have not been made public. The two
videos are then overlaid for analysts, who use sophisticated software to identify tiny changes perhaps the tracks
of a farmer or cows, perhaps those of immigrants who entered the country illegally or perhaps a drug-laden
look for any sign of human activity footprints, broken twigs, trash. About 4 percent of missions have been false
alarms, like tracks of livestock or farmers, and about 2 percent are inconclusive. The remaining 2 percent offer
evidence of illegal crossings from Mexico, which typically results in ground sensors being planted for closer
monitoring. The government has operated about 10,000 drone flights under the strategy, known internally as
change detection, since it began in March 2013. The flights currently cover about 900 miles, much of it in Texas,
and are expected to expand to the Canadian border by the end of 2015. The purpose is to assign agents where
illegal activity is highest, said R. Gil Kerlikowske, commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, the Border
proving the negative showing there isnt anything illegal happening there and therefore no need for agents and
fences. The strategy was launched without fanfare and is being expanded as President Barack Obama prepares to
issue an executive order by the end of this year to reduce deportations and enhance border security. Rep. Michael
McCaul, a Texas Republican who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee, applauded the approach while
noting surveillance gaps still remain. We can no longer focus only on static defenses such as fences and fixed
(camera) towers, he said. Sen. Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican who coauthored legislation last year to add
20,000 Border Patrol agents and 350 miles of fencing to the southwest border, said, If there are better ways of
ensuring the border is secure, I am certainly open to considering those options. Border missions fly out of Sierra
Vista, home of the U.S. Army Intelligence Center at Fort Huachuca, or Corpus Christi, Texas. They patrol at altitudes
between 19,000 at 28,000 feet and from between 25 and 60 miles of the border. The first step is for Border Patrol
sector chiefs to identify areas least likely to attract smugglers, typically those far from towns and roads. Analysts
scour the drone videos at operations centers in Riverside; Grand Forks, North Dakota; and Sierra Vista. After an
runway in Sierra Vista, lifted off with a muffled buzz and disappeared over a rocky mountain range into a blue
Arizona sky. About a dozen computer screens line the wall of their trailer, showing the weather, maps and real-time
lets not waste the manpower here. Lets focus our efforts
someplace else, where theyre needed.
theres nothing there, he said,
, claiming the lives of 70,000 as criminal organizations fight each other for
United States is if the cartels miscalculate and think they can intimidate the U.S. government or strike at American targets safely from a Mexican sanctuary. The most likely candidate would be the group known as the Zetas. They
were created when elite government anti-drug commandos switched sides in the drug war, first serving as mercenaries for the Gulf Cartel and then becoming a powerful cartel in their own right. The Zetas used to recruit mostly ex-
Now the
Zetas are tapping a
much larger, but less disciplined pool of recruits in U.S.
prisons and street gangs
Since intimidation through extreme violence is
a trademark of the Zetas, its spread to the United States raises the possibility of
large-scale violence on American soil
Grayson of the College of William and
Mary put it, The Zetas are determined to gain the reputation of being the most
sadistic, cruel and beastly organization that ever existed.
the Zetas show little fear of the United States government, already
having ordered direct violence against American law enforcement .
most of the
other Mexican cartels are expanding their operations inside the United States.
as expansion and reliance on
undisciplined recruits looking to make a name for themselves through ferocity
continue, the chances of miscalculation or violent freelancing by a cartel affiliate
mount. This could potentially move beyond intergang warfare to the killing of U.S.
officials or outright terrorism like the car bombs
Mexicos violence
could spread north via the partnership between the narcotraffickers and
terrorist groups. The Zetas already have a substantial connection to
Hezbollah, based on collaborative narcotrafficking and arms smuggling. Hezbollah
has relied on terrorism since its founding and has few qualms about conducting
attacks far from its home
Since Hezbollah is a close ally or proxy of Iran, it
might
attempt to strike the U S in retribution for American action against
Tehran. If so, it would likely attempt to exploit its connection with the Zetas, pulling
the narcotraffickers into a transnational proxy war. The foundation for this
scenario is already in place: Security analysts like Douglas Farah have warned of a
military and ex-law enforcement members in large part to maintain discipline and control. But the pool of soldiers and policemen willing to join the narcotraffickers was inadequate to fuel the groups ambition.
very different,
. As George
And without concern for extradition, which helped break the back of
Only a handful of
U.S. states are free of them today. So far the cartels dont appear directly responsible for large numbers of killings in the United States, but
that drug cartels used in Mexico and Colombia. In an assessment for the U.S. Army War College
Strategic Studies Institute, Robert Bunker and John Sullivan considered narcotrafficker car bombs inside the United States to be unlikely but not impossible. A second way that
is
ideologically motivated
some day
nited
tates
from an improbable alliance between narcotraffickers and anti-American states like Iran and
. No matter how violence from the Mexican cartels came to the United States, the key issue
the Zetas,
nother
nited
tates
transnational
, and the Mexican government proved unwilling or unable to respond in a way that Washington
considered adequate,
nited
tates
. While the United States has deep cultural and economic ties to Mexico
and works closely with Mexican law enforcement on the narcotrafficking problem, the security relationship between the two has always been difficultunderstandably so given the long history of U.S. military intervention in Mexico.
, even if those organizations were tied to assassinations, bombings or terrorism in the United States.
if the Mexican government could not or would not do so itself. Failing to act firmly and decisively would weaken the president and encourage the Mexican cartels to believe that they could attack U.S. targets
with impunity. After all, the primary lesson from Sept. 11 was that playing only defense and allowing groups that attack the United States undisturbed foreign sanctuary does not work. But
on Mexican soil
even
nited
tates
one of
and intimate
characterization, arguing that Mexico's drug cartels have no political agenda. But as I have previously discussed, the cartels,
evidenced by their attacks on both the government and the media, are gradually becoming political insurgents as a means of
defending their turf. I note that Clinton used the phrase "We [the United States] face an increasing threat ...," not "they [Mexico]."
cartels are transnational shipping businesses, with consumers in the United States as their dominant market. The
clashes over shipping routes and distribution power -- which over the past four years have killed
28,000 and thoroughly corrupted Mexico's police and judiciary -- could just as well
occur inside the United States. Indeed, growing anxiety that southern Arizona is in
danger of becoming a "no-go zone" controlled by drug and human traffickers
contributed to the passage of Arizona's controversial immigration enforcement
statute earlier this year. Both Clinton and Mexican officials have discussed
Colombia's struggle against extreme drug violence and corruption, revealing
concerns about how dreadful the situation in Mexico might yet become and also as
a model for how to recover from disaster. Colombia's long climb from the abyss,
aided by the U.S. government's Plan Colombia assistance, should certainly give
hope to Mexico's counterinsurgents. But if the United States and Mexico are to
achieve similar success, both will have to resolve political dilemmas that would
prevent effective action. Clinton herself acknowledged as much when she remarked
that Plan Colombia was "controversial ... there were problems and there were
mistakes. But it worked." Isolating Mexico's cartel insurgents from their enormous
American revenue base -- a crucial step in a counterinsurgency campaign -- may
The
require a much more severe border crackdown, an action that would be highly
controversial in both the United States and Mexico. Plan Colombia was a success
partly because of the long-term presence of U.S. Special Forces advisers,
intelligence experts, and other military specialists inside Colombia, a presence
which would not please most Mexicans. And Colombia's long counterattack against
its insurgents resulted in actions that boiled the blood of many human rights
observers. Most significantly, a strengthening Mexican insurgency would very
likely affect America's role in the rest of the world. An increasingly chaotic
American side of the border, marked by bloody cartel wars , corrupted government and media,
and a breakdown in security, would likely cause many in the United States to
question the importance of military and foreign policy ventures elsewhere in the
world. Should the southern border become a U.S. president's primary national
security concern, nervous allies and opportunistic adversaries elsewhere in
the world would no doubt adjust to a distracted and inward-looking
America, with potentially disruptive arms races the result. Secretary Clinton has looked
south and now sees an insurgency. Let's hope that the United States can apply what it has recently learned about insurgencies to
stop this one from getting out of control.
by brutally suppressing its populace. Had the U.S. collapsed and the Soviet Union
emerged as the Cold War victor, Western Europe would likely be speaking Russian
by now. Its difficult to imagine China defending a rule-based, open international
order if it were a unipolar power, much less making an effort to uphold a minimum
level of human rights in the world. Regardless of your opinion on U.S. global
leadership over the last two decades, however, there is good reason to fear its
relative decline compared with China and other emerging nations. To begin with,
hegemonic transition periods have historically been the most destabilizing eras in
history. This is not only because of the malign intentions of the rising and
established power(s). Even if all the parties have benign, peaceful intentions, the
rise of new global powers necessitates revisions to the rules of the road. This is
nearly impossible to do in any organized fashion given the anarchic nature of the
international system, where there is no central authority that can govern
interactions between states. We are already starting to see the potential dangers of
hegemonic transition periods in the Asia-Pacific (and arguably the Middle East). As
China grows more economically and militarily powerful, it has unsurprisingly sought
to expand its influence in East Asia. This necessarily has to come at the expense of
other powers, which so far has primarily meant the U.S., Japan, Vietnam and the
Philippines. Naturally, these powers have sought to resist Chinese encroachments
on their territory and influence, and the situation grows more tense with each
passing day. Should China eventually emerge as a global power, or should nations in
other regions enjoy a similar rise as Kenny suggests, this situation will play itself out
elsewhere in the years and decades ahead. All of this highlights some of the
advantages of a unipolar system. Namely, although the U.S. has asserted military
force quite frequently in the post-Cold War era, it has only fought weak powers and
thus its wars have been fairly limited in terms of the number of casualties involved.
At the same time, Americas preponderance of power has prevented a great power
war, and even restrained major regional powers from coming to blows. For instance,
the past 25 years havent seen any conflicts on par with the Israeli-Arab or Iran-Iraq
wars of the Cold War. As the unipolar era comes to a close, the possibility of great
power conflict and especially major regional wars rises dramatically. The world will
also have to contend with conventionally inferior powers like Japan acquiring
nuclear weapons to protect their interests against their newly empowered rivals.
But even if the transitions caused by Chinas and potentially other nations rises are
managed successfully, there are still likely to be significant negative effects on
international relations. In todays globalized world, it is commonly asserted that
many of the defining challenges of our era can only be solved through multilateral
cooperation. Examples of this include climate change, health pandemics, organized
crime and terrorism, global financial crises, and the proliferation of weapons of
mass destruction, among many others. A unipolar system, for all its limitations, is
uniquely suited for organizing effective global action on these transnational
issues. This is because there is a clear global leader who can take the initiative and,
to some degree, compel others to fall in line. In addition, the unipoles
preponderance of power lessens the intensity of competition among the global
players involved. Thus, while there are no shortages of complaints about the
limitations of global governance today, there is no question that global governance
has been many times more effective in the last 25 years than it was during the Cold
War. The rise of China and potentially other powers will create a new bipolar or
multipolar order. This, in turn, will make solving these transnational issues much
more difficult. Despite the optimistic rhetoric that emanates from official U.S.-China
meetings, the reality is that Sino-American competition is likely to overshadow an
increasing number of global issues in the years ahead. If other countries like India,
Turkey, and Brazil also become significant global powers, this will only further
dampen the prospects for effective global governance.
Uniqueness
Secure Our Borders First Act is an ugly piece of legislation thats clearly intended
to strongarm the Department of Homeland Security into dealing with the border in a
very particular waywith drones and other surveillance technology. The bill appears to
have stalled in the Houseit was on the calendar for last week but wasnt voted on, and it's not on the schedule for
this week. But its not dead yet. And even if it does die, this isnt the first time Congress has tried to increase the
use of drones at the border. In 2013, the Senate passed S.744, the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and
Immigration Modernization Act. The bill called for the use of drones 24 hours per day and for 7 days per week.
The House of Representatives did not pass the legislation, but the drone mandate in HR 399 is eerily similarand it
demonstrates that the idea that drones should be used at the border is persistent. The 72-page piece of legislation,
authored by Rep. Michael McCaul from Texas, gives the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) an incredibly
specific mandate. It requires DHS to gain operational control of high traffic areas within 2 years, and the entire
southern border within 5 years. Operational control means the prevention of all unlawful entries into the United
States. It prescribes exactly how that should be done, and even includes penalties for failure to do so, including
pay freezes for government officials. The bill also prescribes how operational control should be obtained. It does this
by prescribing what equipment 11 specific border points should use. At several of the points, that equipment
includes drones. Additionally, the bill includes the following mandate: The Office of Air and Marine of U.S. Customs
and Border Protection [CBP] shall operate unmanned aerial systems not less than 16 hours per day, seven days per
week. As the ACLU notes, its a little shocking that the bill includes such mandates only weeks after a damning
DHS Inspector General (DHS IG) report titled CBP Drones are Dubious Achievers. And thats just the most recent
report. In June of 2012, EFF called attention to another DHS IG report that faulted the DHS for wasting time, money,
and resources using drones that were ineffective and lacked oversight. To put it in perspective, Predator drones cost
$3,000 per hour to fly. Thats certainly part of the reason that HR 399 authorizes $1 billion in appropriations. Of
course, the waste of money in this bill pales in comparison to its potential negative impact on civil liberties .
Drones pose a multitude of privacy concerns. Drones can be equipped with, among
other capabilities, facial recognition technology, live-feed video cameras, thermal
imaging, fake cell phone towers to intercept phone calls, texts and GPS locations, as
well as backend software tools like license plate recognition, GPS tracking, and facial recognition. They are capable
of highly advanced and near-constant surveillance, and can amass large amounts of data on private citizens, which
can then be linked to data collected by the government and private companies in other contexts.
Lest it seem
that this will only affect communities directly adjacent to the border, or individuals being
investigated or pursued by CBP, its important to note that the government considers the
border to extend 100 miles in, and CBP has certain powers to conduct activities like searches that would
be unconstitutional elsewhere. Furthermore, according to documents obtained by the EFF as part of a Freedom of
Information Act lawsuit against the agency,
In
fact, the documents showed that between 2010-2012, the number of missions CBP flew for state, local and non-CBP
federal agencies increased eight-fold. The silver lining? The legislation hasnt passed yet. Theres still time to
contact your elected representatives and tell them to vote no.
The
Predator Bs use a high-resolution video camera and then return within three days
for another video in the same spot, two officials told the wire service. The two
videos are then overlaid for analysts who use sophisticated software to identify tiny
changes. There are changes in terrain in only eight percent of the drone missions
under the current strategy known internally as change detection since it
began in March 2013. Of those flagged missions, about four percent were false
alarms, like tracks from livestock or farmers, and about two percent are inconclusive to the agents dispatched to
ground sensors or fences along the 1,954-mile border, according to a new report by the Associated Press.
the area to investigate. The remaining 2 percent offer evidence like footprints, broken twigs, trash of illegal
In the last
year and a half, CPB has operated about 10,000 drone flights, with much of their
missions over Texas. Border missions fly out of Sierra Vista, home of the U.S. Army Intelligence Center at
Fort Huachuca, or Corpus Christi, Texas. They patrol at altitudes between 19,000 at 28,000 feet
and between 25 and 60 miles of the border. The program is expected to expand the
the Canadian border by the end of 2015. The purpose is to assign agents where illegal activity is
crossings from Mexico, which typically results in ground sensors being planted for closer monitoring.
highest, R. Gil Kerlikowske, commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, the Border Patrol's parent agency,
which operates nine unmanned aircraft across the country, told AP. " You
The emergency
funding was for 16,526 additional drone and manned aircraft flight hours for border
surveillance, and 16 additional drone crews to better detect and stop illegal activity,
according to administration officials. The request was in response to the
humanitarian crisis after tens of thousands of unaccompanied children and families
illegally entered the country in the first half of the year. Border Patrol wants the money and it
requested $39.4 million for aerial surveillance, including troops, along the US-Mexican border.
wants the drones, McNeal said. This is the kind of crisis where, if you are Border Patrol, you seize the opportunity
its entire fleet of drones after a mechanical function forced a crew to crash an unmanned aircraft valued at $12
million. The mishap lowered the number of agency drones to only nine.
it is
too soon to fully assess the complex economic and public health and safety
implications of state-by-state legalization. More broadly for the nation, it is also
important to address what the legalization debate has thus far either
ignored or oversimplified: the effects on international illicit drug markets,
transnational organized crime and American foreign policy. The illicit drug economy is a
complex system run by resilient criminal networks. Despite the move toward legalization,
the destabilizing influence of illicit economies and transnational crime will
endure, and a sustained national effort will still be needed to address this evolving
threat. Assuming state-by-state commercial legalization continues, illicit
marijuana markets will persist until legal and black market prices
converge and interstate arbitrage opportunities disappear. Neither of these
outcomes is likely in the near-term. States face the very difficult task of managing
consumption levels via unique regulatory regimes that promote scarcity, while
simultaneously trying to price out illicit suppliers. Further, with no regulatory
harmonization among states and no credible movement to legalize
federally interstate arbitrage opportunities persist and are ripe for
exploitation by illicit traffickers. This is not necessarily an argument against
experimenting with legalization, but rather an acknowledgement of market
dynamics and the agility of modern criminal networks. The good news is marijuana traffickers
could provide the policy legitimacy reformers are seeking. However, states should proceed cautiously as
should face shrinking profit margins in commercially regulated states that progress toward competitive pricing.
Link
The
programs are designed to target militants outside the United States who are
suspected of planning attacks, but they inevitably gather some data on Americans ,
U.S. officials said. In a May speech, Obama defended the use of armed drones abroad but said the United States
two domestic
law enforcement agencies use unmanned aircraft systems , according to a department
should never deploy armed drones over U.S. soil. The Justice Department had disclosed that
statement sent to the Judiciary Committee and released on Wednesday by Grassley's office. The two are the Drug
Enforcement Administration and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Grassley sent a letter to
Attorney General Eric Holder on Wednesday asking why the Justice Department did not earlier mention the FBI's use
of drones. At Wednesday's hearing, Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein of California said she was concerned
about the privacy implications of drone surveillance. "The greatest threat to the privacy of Americans is the drone
and the use of the drone, and the very few regulations that are on it today," Feinstein said. Mueller reiterated that
drone use is rare. "It is very narrowly focused on particularized cases and
particularized needs," he said. Mueller is due to retire when his term expires in September.
information, ICE can work in conjunction with Mexican Military forces to target (L)os Zetas both north and south of
the border to disrupt cartel trafficking operations." Texas Department of Public Safety officials distanced themselves
from the report, the paper said. "This document was developed by an outside vendor, and it is imperative to make
clear that the department unequivocally rejects the reference to 'spying,''' said spokesman Tom Vinger in an email.
"This characterization does not reflect the department's position, nor was this ever used as a talking point," the
United States as supporting his contention that the Predator-B drones use without a warrant violated the Fourth
Amendment. The Fourth Amendment affirms the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but
upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and
the persons or things to be seized. In the Kyllo case from 2001, the Supreme Court decided that the use of infrared
detection, as a form of surveillance, to identify marijuana cultivation inside a suspects house violated the Fourth
Amendment. The Supreme Court has yet to consider drone surveillance and the Fourth Amendment, but Kyllo isnt
the only case that could come into play. In California v. Ciraolo (1986), the Supreme Court ruled that an individuals
private property is not protected by the Fourth Amendment as long as an aircraft is in navigable airspace; in this
case, the altitude was 1,000 feet. The Fourth Amendment simply does not require the police traveling in the public
airways at this altitude to obtain a warrant in order to observe what is visible to the naked eye, the Court said. For
now, there doesnt seem to be a clear-cut answer, despite the Fourth Amendments message, partly because of the
technology wrapped up inside higher-tech surveillance drones. Some drones can not only see clearly into your
backyard, but can also theoretically listen (in some circumstances) and take thermal-sensitive pictures. More
sophisticated drones can intercept electronic communications, track GPS information, and use facial recognition
technology. While individuals can expect substantial protections against warrantless government intrusions into
their homes, the Fourth Amendment offers less robust restrictions upon government surveillance occurring in public
places including areas immediately outside the home, such as in driveways or backyards, said Richard M.
Thompson II, an attorney for the Congressional Research Service, in a 2013 study. Concomitantly, as technology
advances, the contours of what is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment may adjust as peoples expectations of
Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Privacy
Information Center are pushing hard for privacy-law reforms that would require law
enforcement to strictly follow the Fourth Amendment when it comes to drone
surveillance.
privacy evolve.
flight time might have involved pilot training, or moving from one base to anotherbut also listed as
person would consider inside the United States. After all, a flight between, say, Boston and Washington, DC would certainly be
within the governments so-called 100-mile zone, and probably also within a more narrowly defined coastal areabut that would
still be well outside the area most people think the Predators are being used.
Drone patrols are expected to expand to the Canadian border in 2015, the news agency added. Michael McCaul, a
Texas Republican who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee, praised the approach but said that
surveillance gaps still remain. "We
Impacts
**Hege Extensions
Hege -- IL Extensions
Mexican collapse is comparatively the greatest geopolitical
threat to hegemony
Kaplan 12 - Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American Security in
Washington, D.C., and has been a foreign correspondent and contributing editor at
The Atlantic, where his work has appeared for three decades. In 2009, he was
appointed to the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, which advised former U.S.
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates on key issues. Mr. Kaplan served on the board
through 2011. From 2006 to 2008, he was the Class of 1960 Distinguished Visiting
Professor in National Security at the U.S. Naval Academy.
(Robert, With the Focus on Syria, Mexico Burns,
https://www.stratfor.com/weekly/focus-syria-mexico-burns#axzz3D9QzKYlq)//BB
While the foreign policy elite in Washington focuses on the 8,000 deaths in a conflict
in Syria half a world away from the United States more than 47,000 people
have died in drug-related violence since 2006 in Mexico. A deeply troubled state as
well as a demographic and economic giant on the United States' southern border,
Mexico will affect America's destiny in coming decades more than any state or
combination of states in the Middle East. Indeed, Mexico may constitute the world's
seventh-largest economy in the near future. Certainly, while the Mexican violence is
largely criminal, Syria is a more clear-cut moral issue, enhanced by its own strategic
consequences. A calcified authoritarian regime in Damascus is stamping out dissent
with guns and artillery barrages. Moreover, regime change in Syria, which the rebels
demand, could deliver a pivotal blow to Iranian influence in the Middle East, an
event that would be the best news to U.S. interests in the region in years or even
decades. Nevertheless, the Syrian rebels are divided and hold no territory, and the
toppling of pro-Iranian dictator Bashar al Assad might conceivably bring to power an
austere Sunni regime equally averse to U.S. interests if not lead to sectarian
chaos. In other words, all military intervention scenarios in Syria are fraught with
extreme risk. Precisely for that reason, that the U.S. foreign policy elite has
continued for months to feverishly debate Syria, and in many cases advocate armed
intervention, while utterly ignoring the vaster panorama of violence next door in
Mexico, speaks volumes about Washington's own obsessions and interests, which
are not always aligned with the country's geopolitical interests. Syria matters and
matters momentously to U.S. interests, but Mexico ultimately matters more, so one
would think that there would be at least some degree of parity in the amount
written on these subjects. I am not demanding a switch in news coverage from one
country to the other, just a bit more balance. Of course, it is easy for pundits to
have a fervently interventionist view on Syria precisely because it is so far away,
whereas miscalculation in Mexico on America's part would carry far greater
consequences. For example, what if the Mexican drug cartels took revenge on San
Diego? Thus, one might even argue that the very noise in the media about Syria,
coupled with the relative silence about Mexico, is proof that it is the latter issue that
actually is too sensitive for loose talk. It may also be that cartel-wracked Mexico
at some rude subconscious level connotes for East Coast elites a south of the
border, 7-Eleven store culture, reminiscent of the crime movie "Traffic," that holds
no allure to people focused on ancient civilizations across the ocean. The concerns
of Europe and the Middle East certainly seem closer to New York and Washington
than does the southwestern United States. Indeed, Latin American bureaus and
studies departments simply lack the cachet of Middle East and Asian ones in
government and universities. Yet, the fate of Mexico is the hinge on which the
United States' cultural and demographic future rests. U.S. foreign policy emanates
from the domestic condition of its society, and nothing will affect its society more
than the dramatic movement of Latin history northward. By 2050, as much as a
third of the American population could be Hispanic. Mexico and Central America
constitute a growing demographic and economic powerhouse with which the United
States has an inextricable relationship. In recent years Mexico's economic growth
has outpaced that of its northern neighbor. Mexico's population of 111 million plus
Central America's of more than 40 million equates to half the population of the
United States. Because of the North American Free Trade Agreement, 85 percent of
Mexico's exports go to the United States, even as half of Central America's trade is
with the United States. While the median age of Americans is nearly 37,
demonstrating the aging tendency of the U.S. population, the median age in Mexico
is 25, and in Central America it is much lower (20 in Guatemala and Honduras, for
example). In part because of young workers moving northward, the destiny of the
United States could be north-south, rather than the east-west, sea-to-shining-sea of
continental and patriotic myth. (This will be amplified by the scheduled 2014
widening of the Panama Canal, which will open the Greater Caribbean Basin to
megaships from East Asia, leading to the further development of Gulf of Mexico port
cities in the United States, from Texas to Florida.) Since 1940, Mexico's population
has increased more than five-fold. Between 1970 and 1995 it nearly doubled.
Between 1985 and 2000 it rose by more than a third. Mexico's population is now
more than a third that of the United States and growing at a faster rate. And it is
northern Mexico that is crucial. That most of the drug-related homicides in this
current wave of violence that so much dwarfs Syria's have occurred in only six of
Mexico's 32 states, mostly in the north, is a key indicator of how northern Mexico is
being distinguished from the rest of the country (though the violence in the city of
Veracruz and the regions of Michoacan and Guerrero is also notable). If the militaryled offensive to crush the drug cartels launched by conservative President Felipe
Calderon falters, as it seems to be doing, and Mexico City goes back to cutting deals
with the cartels, then the capital may in a functional sense lose even further control
of the north, with concrete implications for the southwestern United States. One
might argue that with massive border controls, a functional and vibrantly nationalist
United States can coexist with a dysfunctional and somewhat chaotic northern
Mexico. But that is mainly true in the short run. Looking deeper into the 21st
century, as Arnold Toynbee notes in A Study of History (1946), a border between a
highly developed society and a less highly developed one will not attain an
equilibrium but will advance in the more backward society's favor. Thus, helping to
stabilize Mexico as limited as the United States' options may be, given the
complexity and sensitivity of the relationship is a more urgent national interest
than stabilizing societies in the Greater Middle East. If Mexico ever does reach
coherent First World status, then it will become less of a threat, and the healthy
melding of the two societies will quicken to the benefit of both. Today, helping to
thwart drug cartels in rugged and remote terrain in the vicinity of the Mexican
frontier and reaching southward from Ciudad Juarez (across the border from El Paso,
Texas) means a limited role for the U.S. military and other agencies working, of
course, in full cooperation with the Mexican authorities. (Predator and Global Hawk
drones fly deep over Mexico searching for drug production facilities.) But the legal
framework for cooperation with Mexico remains problematic in some cases because
of strict interpretation of 19th century posse comitatus laws on the U.S. side. While
the United States has spent hundreds of billions of dollars to affect historical
outcomes in Eurasia, its leaders and foreign policy mandarins are somewhat passive
about what is happening to a country with which the United States shares a long
land border, that verges on partial chaos in some of its northern sections, and
whose population is close to double that of Iraq and Afghanistan combined. Mexico,
in addition to the obvious challenge of China as a rising great power, will help write
the American story in the 21st century. Mexico will partly determine what kind of
society America will become, and what exactly will be its demographic and
geographic character, especially in the Southwest. The U.S. relationship with China
will matter more than any other individual bilateral relationship in terms of
determining the United States' place in the world, especially in the economically
crucial Pacific. If policymakers in Washington calculate U.S. interests properly
regarding those two critical countries, then the United States will have power to
spare so that its elites can continue to focus on serious moral questions in places
that matter less.
Guardsmen are struggling to control the flow, sometimes helped but more often
hindered by armed, self-proclaimed U.S. border rangers operating in Arizona, New
Mexico, and Texas. Summary Though clearly a dark scenario, the hypothetical
events outlined above draw on current trends and events to demonstrate howas
has happened repeatedly throughout U.S. historyLatin America can be
transformed from a strategic back- water into a significant threat when U.S.
strategy for that region amounts to little more than benign neglect. In particular, the
scenario illustrates how powers external to the region could plausibly exploit local
instability to generate a major threat to U.S. interests in the Western Hemisphere.
With this scenario serving as a cautionary tale, the following chapter outlines a U.S.
strategy whose objective is to preserve regional security while enabling Washington
to avoid becoming overly involved in the affairs of its neighbors or distracted from
its pressing global responsibilities.
Hege Impact
Heg decreases violence among multiple indicators
Drezner 13 - Professor of International Politics @ Tufts Universitys Fletcher
School
(Dan, The Year of Living Hegemonically, 12-27-13,
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/12/27/the_year_of_living_hegemonically)
A staple of international relations thinking for
decades has been that U.S. hegemony is the mainstay of global order. According
to this "theory of hegemonic stability," peace and prosperity are only likely to persist when a liberal
superpower is prepared to act to keep markets open and stamp out brewing
conflict. If Mead or Robert Kagan are correct, then a United States that is both unwilling and unable to stabilize the rest of the
These sorts of trends tend to give U.S. strategists the heebie-jeebies.
world really should be a source of concern. Here's the thing, though: at the same time that commentators were bemoaning U.S.
Those fearful of disorder have made two fundamental errors in judgment. First, they assume that China, Iran, and others want to
rewrite the global rules of the game. Not so. To be sure, these countries want to preserve their sovereignty and expand their sphere
of influence -- and on these issues, they will clash with the United States. On the other hand, contra Mead, they will also clash with
each other as well. Furthermore, Beijing, Moscow, and Tehran very much want to participate in the global economy. Indeed, the
reason Rouhani is trying to negotiate a nuclear deal is to get Iran out from under the dead weight of crippling economic sanctions.
And contra what everyone expected in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, emerging markets are not eager to topple the existing
global order. Indeed, the recent trade deal in Bali suggests that, if anything, they want to reinforce the existing rules of the game.
The bigger error, however, has come from analysts confusing a U.S. reluctance to use military force in the Middle East with a decline
and livelihoods. Even there, however, it was the threat of American force that triggered an agreement to remove Syria's chemical
U.S. military power has also helped to tamp down conflict in the Central African
Republic, as well as deliver massive humanitarian relief to the Philippines. Indeed, given the depths of its
weapons.
domestic political dysfunction, one can only imagine what America's rivals must think. In 2013 alone, the federal government
couldn't evade a stupid, counterproductive budget sequester, a government shutdown, and brinksmanship with the debt ceiling.
There was no agreement on immigration reform, much less on policies such as climate change, education, or infrastructure.
Despite mounting gridlock and policy own goals , however, the United States ends 2013 with
a rapidly declining federal budget deficit, a surging energy sector, and accelerating
growth in the economy and employment. President Obama was justified in noting that 2014 could be a breakthrough
year for the United States. The most brilliant strategists living in Moscow, Beijing, or Tehran
can't displace the structural strengths of the United States. Which means that for those capitals,
2014 will prove to be a very frustrating year. Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at Tufts University's Fletcher
School and a contributing editor to Foreign Policy.
Reynosa, Mexico. A worker hangs a pinata depicting US Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump at a
workshop in Reynosa, Mexico.
border.
Officials in Nuevo Laredo, the closest major city, as well as in the Tamaulipas state government and
common in
border towns where drug gangs are strong. The most prominent newspaper in Nuevo Laredo, El
prosecutor's office, said they had no further information about the incident. Such silence is
Manana, did not cover the helicopter shooting. An editor said the paper does not write about such news anymore,
given the threats and killings by cartel members that have muzzled many publications in dangerous parts of
Mexico. US Border Patrol agents help minors from El Salvador after they crossed the Rio Grande illegally into the
United States in July 2014 in Mission, Texas. US Border Patrol agents help minors from El Salvador after they
crossed the Rio Grande illegally into the United States in July 2014 in Mission, Texas. Two months ago, suspected
cartel members shot down a Mexican military helicopter in the western state of Jalisco with a
rocket-propelled grenade. Six members of the military were killed in the May 1 attack. Authorities blamed the
New Generation cartel, which has grown into one of the country's most powerful drug gangs. The Jalisco state
prosecutor, Luis Gutierrez, stepped down from his post on Monday amid deteriorating security in the state. Mexican
President Enrique Pena Nieto's administration has purchased at least 25 UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters, worth about
$US775 million, through the US government's foreign military sales program. Some critics have expressed concerns
the military buildup - which includes thousands of Humvee trucks - will intensify the drug
war, while officials say the sales have replaced old, outdated equipment.
that
from Douglas, AZ, it was originally a crossing location for minerals from the mines located to the south. But
during the past month, the dusty streets have seen something they hadn't seen in years: drug
violence and the sounds of gunfire and bombs. "Nobody's going out at night. The restaurants are
closed and so are the discos," said Juan Carlos Olvera, a journalist who has worked the town's streets for 15 years.
said the recent spike in violence is the result of an internal power struggle
within the Sinaloa Drug Cartel, which controls the entire smuggling corridor along the
Arizona and Sonora border. "They're readjusting the power base," said Olvera. In the past year, Olvera
said Agua Prieta had 16 murders. The town had eight murders in just three days in January .
Olvera
They've been carried out in spectacular fashion, with the killers spraying buildings and trucks with hundreds of
bullets. One attack involved a bomb. Mexican police have beefed up patrols and appear to be pulling over vehicles
Along the border, the fear is that this power struggle may
spread to other border towns along the cartel's smuggling corridor.
at random, looking for guns.
Guillermo Arevalo lies on the bank of the Rio Grande, bleeding to death. It's a warm Monday evening in
September 2012. He has just been shot by an agent on a U.S. Border Patrol airboat on the
river. The Border Patrol says the agent shot at rock throwers and that the incident is under investigation.
Witnesses say Arevalo was not throwing rocks. A woman, unseen in a jerky cellphone video, begins to scream
agents risk their lives securing the border, but they also face uncomfortable questions about their use of force.
Suing The Government Bob Hilliard didn't become an attorney to take on civil rights cases. He's a big-time personal
injury trial lawyer in Corpus Christi, Texas, who sues companies like GM and Coca-Cola. His nickname is "The
Bulldog." Today, Hilliard represents families in three Border Patrol shootings where the agent was in the U.S. and the
victim was in Mexico. Photos from the "Borderland" series: 12 short stories about life on the U.S.-Mexico border " I
also realize their job is difficult, but it doesn't give them license to shoot and kill
innocent Mexican nationals," he says. He has filed civil wrongful-death lawsuits against the officers and
the federal government in the case of Arevalo, the man shot on the banks of the Rio Grande, and in two other
injury or death that happens outside the United States, even if it's only a few feet across the border. A federal judge
in El Paso threw out one of Hilliard's lawsuits on these grounds; it's now before the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
What Are The Consequences? So, for now, civil trials will not hold the government responsible for federal agents
who kill Mexicans in Mexico. And two recent reports reveal that the Border Patrol seldom holds its agents
accountable, either. Last December, The Arizona Republic published the results of a yearlong investigation: It
examined 42 deadly shootings by border agents and found that in none of the cases did the officer face
administrative penalties. Investigative reporter Bob Ortega says two things struck him: that use of lethal force is
rare, but that for those agents who kill someone on the job, there is no public accountability. " The
degree to
which no action is taken, the degree to which it's opaque and impossible to find out
what happens when an agent uses deadly force under questionable circumstances,
to me is something that is a matter of great concern ," he says. And it's not only issues of deadly
force. Last week the American Immigration Council, an immigrant advocacy group, released a
report that compiled the results of 809 complaints of excessive force and physical
abuse. In the cases that were resolved, 97 percent led to "no action." Counseling was the
discipline in most of the others, says Guillermo Cantor, senior policy analyst with the council.
Two top members of Congress headed to the border Sunday to investigate a drug
cartel attack on a U.S. Customs and Border Protection helicopter, which raised more
concerns about escalating violence spilling north. Rep. Jason Chaffetz, Utah Republican and
chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, and Rep. Blake Farenthold, Texas Republican,
were planning to get a firsthand look at the situation in Laredo, Texas, after the helicopter was forced to make an
emergency landing Friday. No injuries were reported, but the incident happened just days after Mr. Chaffetz and
Rep. Filemon Vela of Texas, the ranking Democrat on the oversight subcommittee on border security, sent a letter
questioning whether the State Department was taking the cartel violence seriously
enough. In particular, they wondered why the department was poised to cut the danger pay for its diplomatic
personnel in Nuevo Laredo and Matamoros as authorities in northern Mexico were being attacked with stunning
frequency in the drug war. In
alert
warns Americans visiting that region about significant safety risks, including explosions
of violence between rival criminal gangs or the gangs and the Mexican military. The
department warned that no highway routes through Tamaulipas are considered safe and that
the number of kidnappings and abductions of Americans spiked last year. Twice in
February, the U.S. Consulate in Matamoros warned Americans about rolling gunbattles between
competing cartels and issued specific warnings to State Department employees to stay indoors to
side of the Mexican state of Tamaulipas, receive a 20 percent bump. The State Departments traveler
avoid cartel gunmen. Families must live, work and educate their children in the shadow of this threat. Further, even
U.S. personnel in these posts are not directly targeted, they run the risk of being in the wrong
place at the wrong time when violence occurs, the two lawmakers wrote. The Obama
administration has said the drug cartel violence in northern Mexico is troubling but has
been quick to insist that the bloodshed has remained chiefly south of the border and hasnt will
spread into the U.S. The bigger cities along the border are among the safest of their kind, the administration
if
said. We take the security situation very seriously no matter where, Ms. Harf said. That certainly includes Mexico.
We take every threat seriously, certainly. We constantly assess our security needs. Weve also said that multiple
times. But we think its important to have a diplomatic representation in these places and locations. And thats why
we do. She said millions of U.S. citizens visit Mexico safely each year, which is why the State Department has to
keep diplomatic posts open.
Impact Hezbollah
Hezbollah-Cartel cooperation allows access of WMDs into
United States
YucatanTimes '15 (The Yucatan Times; March 30, 2015; Terrorist group
Hezbollah is working with Mexican cartels (U.S Homeland Security);
www.theyucatantimes.com/2015/03/terrorist-group-hezbollah-is-working-withmexican-cartels-u-s-homeland-security/; 7-7-15; mbc)
The Lebanese terrorist group Hezbollah is working with Mexican cartels, said
Lieutenant General Kenneth E. Tovo, deputy commander of the U.S. Southern
Command before the 114th. Congress Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs. During a hearing by the Senate Homeland Security &
Government Affairs Committee, Tovo explained that Hezbollah, which has long
viewed the region as a potential attack venue against Israeli or other Western
targets, has supporters and sympathizers in Lebanese diaspora communities in
Latin America, some of whom are involved in lucrative illicit activities like money
laundering and trafficking in counterfeit goods and drugs. I think it is fair to say
that there is a good amount of profit that Lebanese Hezbollah makes off of illegal
trafficking, Tovo added. In the generals opinion, the relative ease with which
human smugglers moved tens of thousands of people to our nations doorstep also
serves as another warning sign: these smuggling routes are a potential vulnerability
to our homeland. As I stated last year, terrorist organizations could seek to leverage
those same smuggling routes to move operatives with intent to cause grave harm
to our citizens or even bring weapons of mass destruction into the United
States. In May 2011 an Iranian-American car seller who lived in Corpus Christi,
Texas, identified as Manssor Arbabsiar, met a man that he believed was a member
of the Mexican cartel Los Zetas and offered him US$1.5 million to murder the Saudi
ambassador to the United States. Over the next four months in 2011, Arbabsiar, a
spy for the Royal Forces, a special operations unit of the Islamic Revolutionary
Guards of Iran, and another person posing as his cousin met in Mexico with the
man they thought was a member of Los Zetas, who was actually an undercover
agent of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). Lt. Gen. Kenneth Tovo said that
"it is fair to say that there is a good amount of profit that Lebanese Hezbollah makes
off of illegal trafficking". (Photo: eluniversal.com.mx) Lt. Gen. Kenneth Tovo said that
it is fair to say that there is a good amount of profit that Lebanese Hezbollah
makes off of illegal trafficking. (Photo: eluniversal.com.mx) The DEA agent
requested that the money was deposited in a bank controlled by the Federal Bureau
of Investigation (FBI). Soon after, in September 2011, Arbabsiar was captured with
the help of Mexican authorities, accused of trying to assassinate a diplomat based
in Washington, DC. About the relationship of Hezbollah with drug trafficking, U.S.
Marine General John Kelly, commander of the Southern Command, said in a speech
delivered to an audience at the National Defense University in Washington in
October 2014 that we know that some of the [cocaine] money that comes out of
the United States is laundered into the coffers of Hezbollah. Lieutenant General
Kenneth E. Tovo, deputy commander of the U.S. Southern Command, said that the
extremist group has supporters and sympathizers in Lebanese diaspora
subject with any degree of seriousness numbs the mind. The goal of this essay is to present the case for making the
Failing
nation-stateslike North Koreawhich possess nuclear weapons potentially pose a
nuclear threat. Each new entrant to the nuclear club increases the possibility this will happen, but this problem
is an old one, and one that existing diplomatic and military structures aim to manage. The newer and less
understood danger arises from the increasing likelihood that stateless groups, bent on
terrorism, will gain access to nuclear weapons, most likely by theft from a nation-state. Should this happen, the
danger we now perceive to be coming from rogue states will pale in comparison.
The ultimate response to a nuclear attack is a nuclear counterattack . Nation
needed changes before such a catastrophe occurs. The issues described here are too important to ignore.
states have an address, and they know that we will retaliate in kind. Stateless groups are much more difficult to find
which makes a nuclear counterattack virtually impossible. As a result, they can strike without fear of overwhelming
retaliation, and thus they wield much more effective destructive power. Indeed, in many cases the fundamental
state and some personnel. The damage slowed the organization down but did not destroy it. Instead, the stateless
al-Qaeda survived and adapted. The United States can claim some success against al-Qaeda in the years since
9/11, but it has hardly delivered a deathblow. Eventually,
whoever wishes to weaken the power of U.S. sovereignty. As shown by the increase
of Islamic missionaries in Mexico, as well as the growing influence of Hezbollah and
Iran, it is clear that Islamists are trying to win the hearts and minds of the Mexican
people. However, beneath these seemingly peaceful developments lie the fact that
Irans Islamic Revolutionary Guard and Quds forces are partnering with major
Mexican drug cartels. They are learning Mexican culture, as well as Spanish, and are
starting to blend in with native-born Mexicans. Hezbollah has training bases and
sleeper cells in Mexico and South America. They also assist drug cartels with skills in
bomb-making and explosives. Hezbollah has also created tunnels on the American
border that are extremely similar to those dividing Gaza and Egypt. These
tunnels are perfect for the transport of illegal conventional and biological
weapons to contacts in the United States. Weaponry created by Hezbollah
is capable of killing hundreds of thousands of people in major U.S. cities .
Former Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Roger Noriega
believes that an attack on U.S. personnel installations by Hezbollah is possible. It is
known that they have expanded from their operations in Paraguay, Brazil and
Argentina, and are gaining ground in Central America and Mexico. The relationship
between Hezbollah and Los Zetas has almost touched down on American soil. Los
Zetas was to be paid to bomb the Israeli Embassy in Washington, and the Saudi and
Israeli embassy in Argentina.
Impact ISIS
ISIS will team up with the Cartels to cross the border
West 2014 (Allen [Senior Fellow at the London Center for Policy Research]; Nightmare on
the border: ISIS and Mexican cartels teaming up; Aug 22;
allenbwest.com/2014/08/nightmare-border-isis-mexican-cartels-teaming/; kdf)
As reported by Breitbart, Former
in the Senate so current Majority Leader Harry Reid can be dismissed. After all, it was Reid who openly stated that
our southern border is secure a statement so absurd it demonstrates the man has lost his touch with reality. Both
Reid and Obama are turning a blind eye toward a dedicated existential threat to our sovereignty and security all for
cheap political gain. Earlier this week, according to Breitbart, Rep. Ted Poe (R-Tx), a member of the House Judiciary
Committee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security, was asked if there is any current interaction between ISIS
and Mexican drug cartels. He said In my opinion, yes there seems to be a talking to each other He added, The
drug cartels use the same operational plan as terrorist groups do They kill their
opponents, they behead their opponents, they brag about it and they have operational control of many
portions of the southern border of the United States. Theyre vicious as some of these other
terrorist organizations. And meanwhile, our president plays golf. A prudent Commander-in-Chief would be
assessing the most dangerous course of action for ISIS. A prudent leader would have walked the border and
where our Republic is most vulnerable and allocated the proper security assets to
A JV team doesnt possess the global reach ISIS has, and a JV
team wouldnt have the chutzpah to behead an American and post the video on
YouTube for the world to see. This is not a criminal investigation, it is deliberate and open
aggression. It is war, as determined by our enemy. We either accept it, or continue as the Obama
assessed the gaps
administration does to dismiss, deny and disregard this threat all to the detriment of our country.
highly probable that ISIS will attempt to use some of this money to obtain nuclear,
chemical, biological or other weapons of mass death on the international black
market or from corrupt officials in nations such as Russia, China, Pakistan or North
Korea to use in attacks against New York, Washington, London, Paris, Berlin, Rome,
Brussels or other nations it considers infidel enemies. This danger is magnified by
the fact that ISIS has recruited nationals of the United States and Europe, who
possess American and European passports and are physically indistinguishable from
local populations in America and Europe. It is extraordinary that the mass murdering
butchery of ISIS is so demented than even al Qaeda is offended. It is alarming that
the CIA, which launched intelligence operations even against the United States
Senate, and the NSA, which launched massive and unprecedented eavesdropping
operations, and intelligence services of leading European nations were blind to the
magnitude of the ISIS threat until the most barbaric terrorists in modern history had
taken over almost a third of Iraq and are on the brink of creating a terrorist superstate that dwarfs al Qaedas efforts prior to 9/11. I vehemently opposed the
misguided Iraq War from the moment it was proposed by former President George
W. Bush and have never been a neoconservative, warmonger or super-hawk. But
aggressive action against ISIS is urgently needed. ISIS has stated its intention to
attack the United States and Europe to advance its evil, messianic and genocidal
ideology and ambitions. ISIS has the money to purchase the most deadly weapons
in the world, and has recruited American and European traitors with above-average
capability to execute an attack. The odds that ISIS can obtain nuclear, chemical,
biological or other forms of mass destruction weapons are impossible to ascertain
but in a world of vast illegal arms trafficking, with so many corrupt officials in
nations possessing arsenals of destruction, the danger is real. The fact that WMD
scares prior to the Iraq War ranged from mistaken to deceitful does not mean that
the WMD danger does not exist today. It does. I applaud the recent actions taken by
President Obama. Obamas airstrikes saved tens of thousands of Yazidis from
genocide, took back the Mosul Dam from ISIS and saved countless Iraqis, Kurds and
Syrians from slaughter. The airstrikes inflicted material damage to ISIS. The
diplomacy of Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry contributed mightily to the
replacement of a disastrous Iraqi government by a government can unite Iraqi
Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds. The Obama-Kerry initiatives will lead to the creation of a
stable Afghan government and avoid the collapse that was possible after the recent
controversial Afghan elections. These are real successes. In the current political
climate, Obama seems to get credit for nothing, but he deserves great credit for
some important successes in recent weeks. And yet the danger of ISIS pulling off a
nuclear, chemical, biological or other mass death 9/11-style attack in a major
American or European city is real. Even with dirty or primitive WMD weapons, the
casualty totals could be catastrophic.
counternarcotics. One of the drones used for the mission is the Air Forces Global Hawk, reports The New York
Times. The drone soars at up to 60,000 feet with a multitude of sensors. (Calm down, its unarmed.)
way to my county pretty soon.- Rockingham County Sheriff Sam Page. While most law enforcement agencies want
to make clear that the level of violent crime currently embroiling Mexico is not likely to spread to the U.S. anytime
In
recent years the DTOs [drug trafficking organizations] have changed their tactics and become bolder, Lt. Gerry
Adcock of Oregons Marion County Sheriffs Office told Fox News Latino. The men and women involved in todays
[drug trafficking] kill or make other drug traffickers disappear without fear of consequence. I have personally
investigated homicides and violent incidents directly related to DTOs and have seen the destruction they have
caused to families in our community. One such case was the murder of Rogelio Hernndez-Davalos, who was killed
at point-blank range in the front seat of his Ford Expedition in January of 2012. The Marion County Sheriffs Office
investigation found that Hernndez-Davalos, a native of Sinaloa, Mexico, was purportedly moving about 30 pounds
of heroin every two weeks and is believed to have been executed by a Mexican cartel for either stealing from his
bosses or attempting to branch off on his own.
Minnesota and a series of murders in Virginia have been attributed to drug cartel feuds. Authorities in rural
Rockingham County, North Carolina said that 15 drug cartel associates have been arrested there in the last three
years, including the arrest of two alleged cartel associates whose home was filled with 1,060 pounds of marijuana,
more than $600,000 in cash and an AR-15 assault rifle. A few years ago law enforcement didnt see this as a
problem for somewhere other than the border, Rockingham County Sheriff Sam Page told FNL. What
happens at the border doesnt stay at the border. It makes its way to my county
pretty soon. Violent crime related to the cartels may occur in the U.S., but most
law enforcement officials and experts agree that the main worry for Americans is
the drugs not the violence that the cartels bring with them . Still, many say that is
something to be concerned about. Every American needs to be concerned about drug
trafficking organizations being in the U.S., Payne said, and where they are and where the
money goes.
way to the beach town of Puerto Peasco, commonly known as Rocky Point. Cortez, 34, was among hundreds of
By
some accounts, 28 gunmen and two innocent civilians were killed in the Sonoyta
area from April 30 to May 5. The Sonora investigative state police reported six people killed on May 1 and
people who fled Desierto de Sonora, less than 10 miles east of Sonoyta, after violence erupted last month.
another five on May 4. Residents said the criminals themselves started to warn people of upcoming shootouts and
manager. It was a preventive measure. The mayor, Julio Cesar Ramrez Vsquez, is no longer giving interviews, his
office said, after one of the groups threatened him for speaking out. So far this year, the Sonora state police has
reported 38 homicides just in the Sonoyta area with a population of about 18,000 with another five wounded.
May was the deadliest month, with 15 dead and another one injured, Sonora police data analyzed by the Arizona
Daily Star show. And those are just the officially reported numbers. By other accounts, it was 22 dead including
six burned bodies and at least a handful of others injured.There have also been gun battles between the Sonora
state police and gunmen that have resulted in at least another 14 dead.
others who are missing and unaccounted for. Another 14 people have died in neighboring Caborca,
plus 11 injured including four state police officers. Most recently, more than a dozen Central
American immigrants were rescued near a ranch on the town's outskirts, close to
the U.S. border. State police reported three dead, including two men found inside torched vehicles and a
woman with gunshot wounds. From what we can tell, migrants were using one of the drug routes, said Erica
Curry, a Phoenix spokeswoman with the Drug Enforcement Administration. We believe they were attacked because
with a narco message saying the Sinaloa Cartel was taking over the plaza. The latest round started in March, Curry
said. The Sonora state police reported 10 deaths in the Sonoyta area that month, including a soldier who was
patrolling a rural area when he and his partner who survived came under attack. The Sinaloa cartel has
decentralized over the past few years, leading to sporadic, violent power struggles between plaza bosses in
northern Sonora, said Tristan Reed, a security analyst for the Austin-based global intelligence firm Stratfor. Also,
several top leaders of the cartel were arrested, creating a power vacuum. On Sept. 6, 2012, Mexican police arrested
Adelmo Niebla Gonzlez, the suspected leader of Los Memos
bringing weapons into the US and transporting marijuana, meth and cocaine from Sonora to
Maricopa County. "El Memo" came to power with help from Joaqun El Chapo Guzmn, the head of the Sinaloa cartel who was arrested in February 2014. He and his two bodyguards
escaped a Sinaloa prison in 2014 through a tunnel that was dug into the prison from the outside. A few months after that arrest, in November 2012, Mexican soldiers arrested Jess
Alfredo Salazar Ramrez, the leader of Los Salazar, in the state of Mexico. Salazar, who came to power after his father was arrested in 2011, was said to be responsible for cultivating,
transporting and smuggling marijuana through Sonora and a western sliver of Chihuahua into the United States. He was also an important lieutenant of El Chapo Guzmn. In 2013,
Puerto Peasco was the scene of an hours-long battle between drug cartel gunmen and the Mexican federal police, who allegedly killed Gonzalo Inzunza, also known as El Macho Prieto
and a top lieutenant of the Sinaloa cartel. The body was never recovered. Macho Prieto was involved in one of the first signs of Sinaloa infighting we are still seeing going on, Reed
said. Sonora has always been a key place for traffickers. To the south and east, in neighboring Sinaloa and Chihuaha and somewhat within Sonora, too is significant drug production
including opium poppies, marijuana and meth. To the north, the border is more porous than in other places and far more desolate. Across the border from Sonoyta is Organ Pipe Cactus
National Monument, 330,000 acres of public land, and further east is the Tohono OOdham Nation, a reservation about the size of Connecticut. Theres nothing but desert for miles and
miles, said the DEAs Curry. Its, unfortunately, one of our biggest vulnerabilities for drug trafficking. On the Mexican side, its all agriculture, cattle ranching and sparsely populated
rural communities. Most drug shipments are believed to arrive in Puerto Peasco. From there they go east to Agua Prieta, Sonoyta, San Luis Ro Colorado, Nogales or are shipped by foot
north through the desert, where there is less law enforcement, Stratfor has reported. The western corridor of the Border Patrols Tucson sector has been the busiest for some years now.
More than 60 percent of the marijuana seized in the sector is in this area. Mexican federal authorities have destroyed and seized thousands of pounds of marijuana and had several
major seizures of meth, primarily found inside tractor trailers headed to Tijuana and Mexicali. For a drug trafficker, its almost impossible to avoid Sonora, Reed said, whether it is to cross
drugs directly into the United States or to transport them further west to Baja California. Drugs and people are transported from Mexico to the United States while weapons and money
come from the United States to Mexico, said Sonora State Attorney Carlos Navarro Sugich, who oversees the states investigative police. The complexities of the area make it essentially
a paradise for the cartels, Sugich said. But the violence in Sonoyta is not representative of whats happening in the rest of the state. Sonoyta has seen nearly twice as many homicides
since last year 38 so far in 2015 versus 16 for the same period in 2014, he said. The states overall number of homicides feel during the same period, from 275 to 200. The three
levels of government are working together to bring peace back to the region. Sonoyta only has about 20 police officers, but with all levels of government included, more than 100 law
enforcement personnel patrol the area. I dont care if the criminal groups get along or not, Navarro said, no one has a reason to be killing each other.At the scene, officials have found
AK-47s and AR-15 rifles, shotguns and ammunition. Some of the dead were found wearing camouflage clothing and tactical vests. Those identified have been from Sonora and from
neighboring states including Sinaloa and Chihuahua. One day in May, a fight broke out, and Cortez, the mother of three, told her kids to get on the floor. They grabbed at her legs and
pleaded with her to lie down with them, but she kept watch. Dont get up, she demanded as she peeked through the bedroom window. I have to make sure theyre not coming this
way. As soon as the fighting was over, she grabbed a change of clothes for each child and fled to her sisters home in Sonoyta. She was there for almost two weeks. She didnt want to
overstay her welcome, she said, but she doesnt want to live in Desierto de Sonora anymore. If she has to leave the house and cant take the children with her, she tells them to lock
themselves in and not open the door to anyone. Her son Joel, 13, said only a handful of children have gone back to school. Many fled to other cities, even other states. Joel likes his
home, he said, but only when bad things dont happen. He knows sicarios, people who kill each other, are in the area There was a killing over there, and over there, he says pointing to
different locations. His mother is still afraid. Every little sound wakes me up at night, she said. Juan Ortega, 65, was at home when shooting broke out on his street. He and his wife,
Mara Hernndez, ran inside and hid under their bed, he said. The bullets sounded like hail hitting the tin roof. The couple worked in the nearby cotton and asparagus fields until they
could no longer do so because of their age. Now they run a small snack stand outside their home, where neighborhood children go for their daily treat of potato chips, juices and Mexican
candy. The day of the shootout, they packed a suitcase, grabbed their pit bull, Rocky, and headed to Sonoyta, where they stayed a few days with a relative. We were last ones to leave
and first ones to come back. Ortega said. Desierto de Sonora has been their home for 42 years. We didnt want to leave our little house, he said. This is all we have. Desierto de
Sonora is an ejido, communal land owned by the people. Many came decades ago from other states to work in the fields and never left. They had children and their children had children.
With about 200 hundred houses, it is home to 1,200 people. This is a place where people look out for each other. Its a place where kids can roam free. If someone gets sick, everyone
, violence so
close to home has taken a major toll on residents' financial and emotional
well-being.
pitches in to help, said Dionisia Gutierrez, who has lived here for 22 years. But even though the gun battles have stopped and even as people return home
AT: Probability
Leading report, the most significant threat to the US is the
cartels crossing over
Ortiz 15 (Ildefonzo Ortiz, Mexican drug cartels are Texas most significant threat,
February 28th 2015, http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015 /02/28/dps-reportmexican-drug-cartels-are-texas-most-significant-threat/)
A Department of Public Safety (DPS) report states that Mexican drug
cartels are among the most significant threats facing Texas and the United
States. Mexican drug cartels continue to operate throughout Texas carrying out
violent attacks throughout the state as well as controlling the flow of illegal aliens
and drug trafficking, the report states. Texas top law enforcement agency places the spread
of Mexican drug cartel operations across the state as one of the top current security threats.
The meteoric rise to power of Mexican cartels is attributed to a porous border as well as the unending demand for
drugs, commercial sex and forced labor, the agency wrote. The stern warning came in a leaked report from DPS to
state lawmakers requesting additional funding for the current border surge where hundreds of state troopers patrol
the Rio Grande Valley. The request comes in response to an unprecedented spike in human smuggling and drug
trafficking activity along the border. The report was first published by the Houston Chronicle. As previously reported
multiple kidnappings across the nation where the criminal organization targets the relatives of individuals believed
to have either stolen or lost a drug load, the report revealed.
in Texas that raise red flags for law enforcement include: A May 2013 murder in Southlake where three cartel
hitmen spent two years preparing the execution of a Mexican lawyer who represented members of the Gulf Cartel.
To carry out the murder, the hitmen, two of whom were former Mexican, cops spent a long time tailing the
individual and setting up a complex surveillance network of video cameras to track his movements. Breitbart Texas
previously reported on the arrest of these cartel hitmen. In July 2014, two Edinburg police officers were injured in a
fierce firefight with a member of the Texas Syndicate. These gang members were working for the Gulf Cartel in the
border town of La Joya. The officers had been trying to arrest the man in connection with the execution of a 19-yearold in relation to a drug deal gone bad. The teen had been shot in the back of the head. In addition to the report,
Breitbart Texas also reported on that shootout. In November 2013, members of the Gulf Cartel wearing vests with
insignia from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Hidalgo County Sheriffs Office carried out a
series of home invasions in Las Milpas. The cartel members passed themselves off as law enforcement as they
burst in through the door holding residents at gunpoint and demanding cash and drugs. The gunmen made off with
at least $100,000 in cash in one of those raids. In June 2013, La Joya police rescued five illegal immigrants who had
Mexican
cartel members have also taken advantage of the recent increase of illegal aliens
trying to get to America who have arrived in their territory. In addition to making a
profit by getting them into the country, cartel members are using them to tie up law
enforcement by sending them as bait while drug smugglers are able to move narcotics with
been kidnapped by a man claiming to be a cartel member. The man had been holding them for ransom.
Aff
the seizure of almost 50,000 pounds of marijuana, worth an estimated $122 million,
along the Southwest border in 2013. Customs and Border Protection dismissed
suggestions that a major expansion of its drone fleet would occur anytime soon.
Although plans to fly as many as two dozen drones were authorized years ago,
Schied said the department did not have the money to follow through and that
there is no intent at this time to operate more than 10 of the aircraft.
are equipped with a Pentagon-designed radar with the ominous name of VADER
(Vehicle and Dismount Exploitation Radar). Originally designed to spot the Taliban in
Afghanistan, VADER can't distinguish between lawful American citizens and border
crossers.
of interest and MSC detection ranges are significantly better than those of handheld
alternatives. Technology is critical to border security operations and through the
deployment of these effective technologies, the Border Patrol gains more coverage
of fixed surveillance gaps and situational awareness, and increases its ability to
adapt to changing conditions and effectively detect, identify, track, and interdict
potential threats along the Southwest border.
Patrol to focus on potentially prime crossing points for illegal traffickers. EIT division
chief Steve Evans emphasizes that the system is not a catchall. But it is one of
many helpful tools used to fight illegal border crossings and ultimately allows the
U.S. Border Patrol to strategically place its manpower. Mobile Surveillance Systems
In conjunction with the RVSS, the Mobile Surveillance System (MSS) that is used by
the U.S. Border Patrol allows the same type of security and surveillance as the
RVSS, but it has the mobile component that is necessary to cover a larger area. The
MSS is a camera mounted on a high pole affixed to a large flatbed truck, thus
allowing it to be mobile. In addition to the camera bundles, the MSS has a radar unit
that is particularly helpful in the desert environment. Moreover, the U.S. Border
Patrol uses Mobile Remote Video Surveillance Systems (MRVSS), or scope trucks,
that are smaller than the MSS trucks and permit access to more remote locations.
Unattended Ground Sensors The U.S. Border Patrol has been using sensors to detect
motion for years; however, it has adapted to evolving technologies that are more
precise and intelligent. These modern sensors are strategically placed upon the
recommendation of the field agents in problem locations. The Unattended Ground
Sensors (UGS) come in three main forms: seismic, magnetic, and infrared. The
seismic sensors detect ground movement; the magnetic ones recognize metal in
passing vehicles; and the infrared sensors respond to the breakage of spatial
planes. The U.S. Border Patrol is mindful of the environmental limitations of sensors,
for example, the seismic sensors are not appropriate for northern borders because
of frozen ground affecting their functionality. The U.S. Border Patrol analyzes
different terrains to decipher which areas would benefit from what particular types
of sensor in order to ensure their effectiveness. E3/IDENT The E3/IDENT is a
technology that was created to assist in evaluating arrests and in collecting the
biometrics and photographs of apprehended persons. This technology allows agents
to secure this information and forward it to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
Within 8 to 10 minutes, agents will receive historic federal criminal information on
individuals. Moreover, it will display whether or not an individual currently is wanted
for a criminal offense. Another component is its capability to access the INS/IDENT
database in order to search for possible immigration violations. Results and Moving
Forward Assistant Chief of the U.S. Border Patrol, Robert Nelson, claims that EIT fills
the immediate technology gap. Both Chiefs Nelson and Evans stress the
importance of using technology to better secure U.S. borders. Chief Evans is
constantly searching for and learning about emerging technologies that will better
assist his team in their mission. It is imperative to note that all three components
technology, infrastructure, and personnelplay important and interconnected roles
in securing U.S. borders. Overall, the combined use of all three contributed to
723,825 apprehensions in fiscal year 2008 and ultimately assisted in keeping U.S.
citizens safe.
No impact Violence
their impact assumes a level of violence thats empirically
denied by the last decade and totally implausible due to cartel
interests and basic state functionsmeans it wont reach the
level of deterioration required for their scenario
David Shirk 14, director of the Trans-Border Institute and associate professor of
political science at the University of San Diego, March 2014, Conclusion: Toward a
More Comprehensive and Community-based Approach to Public Security, part of a
report called Building Resilient Communities in Mexico: Civic Responses to Crime
and Violence, Mexico Institute @ Wilson Center,
http://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/resilient-communities-mexico-2014
This points to another, perhaps unexpected change under Pea Nieto: continuity in the U.S.-Mexican security relationship across administrations. Over the
last year, U.S.-Mexico security cooperation has experienced significant setbacks. At the outset, the Pea Nieto administration insisted that Mexicos
cooperation with the United States on security matters would be reined back and managed through the single ticket window (ventanilla nica) of
Mexicos Interior Ministry. Yet, over the last year, pressure from other federal and state-level agencies has seemingly led to a softening of this policy of
cooperation have continued, in part because of the close ties and tremendous interdependence that has
developed between U.S. and Mexican law enforcement agencies working toward common objectives. Indeed,
such cooperation helped Pea Nieto take down the head of the Zetas, Mexicos most notorious and
violent drug cartel, as well as key leaders in the Gulf Cartel. Ultimately, the key question
is whether the current governments efforts have actually been accompanied by a decrease in
violence. The answer is a qualified yes. While violence appears to have declined somewhat under
Pea Nieto, it definitely did not go away. Last year, the Justice in Mexico Projects annual report on drug violence in
Mexico found that violent homicides probably reached a peak in 2010 and 2011, and began to decline
significantly in 2012.6 Thanks to a significant drop in violence in places like Tijuana,
Monterrey, and Ciudad Jurez, the number of homicides in Mexico dropped by the
thousands. This trend has continued in 2013, and in the final analysis will likely result in a slight reduction in
centralization. Many aspects of
Mexicos overall homicide rate compared with the previous year, perhaps as much as 20 percent, but not quite what Pea Nieto had hoped for (See Figure
1).
No impact Hezbollah
Hezbollah wont do it
Jen Quraishi 8-12-2010 Hezbollah in Mexico Stoking Terrorism Fears
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2010/08/hezbollahs-mexican-cartel-connection
The idea of Hezbollah operatives in Mexico using the chaos caused by the government's war with
the drug cartels as an opportunity to launch a terrorist attack on the US is not a new one. In June, Rep. Sue
Myrick (R-N.C.) asked Department of Homeland Security head Janet Napolitano to investigate the Hezbollah's
presence on the US's southern border, particularly in light of the increasing number of gang members arrested in
southwestern states who have tattoos in Farsi. "We have typically seen tattoos in Arabic," Rep. Myrick wrote, "but
Farsi implies a Persian influence that can likely be traced back to Iran and its proxy army, Hezbollah." I don't know
how good Myrick's first-hand knowledge of tattoos is, but she's right in suggesting that Hezbollah has seemed to up
its presence in Mexico of late, including smuggling people across the border and drug trafficking. The Heritage
Foundation goes further, reporting that though US officials have not confirmed it, Hezbollah member Jamal Nasr was
No impact ISIS
Zero risk of ISIS crossing the border illegally when they can
just do it legallyclaims otherwise are just hype
Schmidt 9/15 (Michael S; US pushes back against warnings that ISIS plans to
enter from Mexico; www.nytimes.com/2014/09/16/us/us-pushes-back-againstwarnings-that-isis-plans-to-enter-from-mexico.html; kdf)
WASHINGTON Militants for the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria have traveled to Mexico and are just miles from the
United States. They plan to cross over the porous border and will imminently launch car bomb attacks. And the
threat is so real that federal law enforcement officers have been placed at a heightened state of alert, and an
American military base near the border has increased its security. As the Obama administration and the American
public have focused their attention on ISIS in recent weeks ,
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee came hours before President Barack Obama was to outline
in a speech plans to expand the U.S. offensive against Islamic State. Steps under consideration include blocking
foreign fighters from entering Syria and Iraq, delivering more aid to moderate factions among Syrian rebels, and
expanding air strikes to Islamic State targets in Syria.
K of ISIS Impacts
Claims that ISIS will cross the border are fed by racist-jingoism
Bow 2014 (Charles M; ISIS, deep in the heart of Texas; Sep 3;
www.nytimes.com/2014/09/04/opinion/isis-deep-in-the-heart-of-texas.html; kdf)
ISIS, is coming to Texas? Yes, if you listen to
conservatives, particularly those from Texas. First, lets say this flatly: ISIS is an outrageously
barbaric group that poses a real threat to the Middle East in the short term and possibly
The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or
to Western countries in the long term. And watching the beheading of American journalists by ISIS is most
unsettling, to say nothing of the pain and torment it must cause the victims families. It offends and infuriates. The
we
must still stay levelheaded, and not allow politicians and pundits to talk us into
armed conflict without clarity of mission and scope . And we also mustnt allow them to inflate
heart breaks and the eyes water. And there is a natural revulsion and rousing of anger. But through the anger
the image of the enemy to such a degree that we feel that caution and patience are not options. The latter seems
Defense Department analyst under President Bush says ISIS, the Islamic jihadists creating a Muslim caliphate in Iraq
and beyond, could use the Mexican border to infiltrate America, and it could happen sooner rather than later.' The
site continued, ISIS may be working to infiltrate the U.S. with the aid of transnational drug cartels, he said, citing
the violent Mexican criminal gang MS-13 as a highly likely candidate for the partnership. WND was not the only
one to hype the cartel line. Representative Ted Poe of Texas said in August that there was interaction between ISIS
and Mexican drug cartels and that they were talking to each other. Fox News reported Friday on a so-called
situational awareness bulletin sent out by the Texas Department of Public Safety and obtained by the news
network. According to Fox, the bulletin read, A review of ISIS social media messaging during the week ending
August 26 shows that militants are expressing an increased interest in the notion that they could clandestinely
infiltrate the southwest border of U.S., for terror attack. And members of the Obama administration wittingly or
not fed the frenzy. In a joint news conference in August, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and the chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, further inflated ISIS and raised the issue of immigration and the
border. Hagel called ISIS an imminent threat to every interest we have and said, This is beyond anything weve
seen. We must prepare for everything. Dempsey said, Because of open borders and immigration issues, its an
immediate threat, that is to say, the fighters who may leave the current fight and migrate home. Longer-term, it is
Gov. Rick Perry of Texas recently hinted that ISIS fighters might have already crossed the U.S.-Mexico border.
According to Perry, Theres the obvious great concern that because of the condition of the border, from the
standpoint of it not being secure and us not knowing who is penetrating across, that individuals from ISIS or other
terrorist states could be. Perry continued, I think its a very real possibility that they may have already used that.
Rear Adm. John Kirby, the Pentagon press secretary, said on CNN, however, that although ISIS had a desire to strike
Western targets, there was no information that leads us to believe that ISIS fighters had crossed the border. The
Conservative Judicial Watch issued a statement last week claiming: Islamic terrorist groups are operating in the
Mexican border city of Ciudad Jurez and planning to attack the United States with car bombs or other vehicle-borne
improvised explosive devices (VBIED). High-level federal law enforcement, intelligence and other sources have
confirmed to Judicial Watch that a warning bulletin for an imminent terrorist attack on the border has been issued.
Agents across a number of Homeland Security, Justice and Defense agencies have all been placed on alert and
instructed to aggressively work all possible leads and sources concerning this imminent terrorist threat. The
National Counterterrorism Center director, Matthew Olsen, said that while ISIS did pose significant threat to us it
was not Al Qaeda pre-9/11 and we have no credible information that ISIS is planning to attack the United States.
The ISIS-at-the-border hype appears to simply be an attempt to kill two birds with
one stone be pro-war and anti-immigration at the same time.
ruined the country doesnt correlate to the views of any notable economist. An open
letter to President George W. Bush in 2006, signed by around five hundred
economists (including five Nobel laureates) stated the following: While a small
percentage of native-born Americans may be harmed by immigration, vastly more
Americans benefit from the contributions that immigrants make to our economy,
including lower consumer prices. Although Harvard economist Jorge Borjas has
stated that illegal immigrants from 1980-2000 have reduced the wages of high
school dropouts in the U.S, he also states that the average Americans wealth has
increased by 1 percent because of illegal immigration. In an op-ed published in the
Los Angeles Times, UC Davis economist Giovanni Peri stated that new laws are
needed to meet demands within industries like construction, agriculture, and
hospitality: In recent decades, the high demand for these services and the pressure
for keeping their cost low and prices competitive have generated incentives to hire
undocumented workers. Some people claim that illegal immigrants represent an
assault on our sovereignty. If this is true, then it might be the first time in world
history that a country has employed its invaders. When illegal immigrants cross the
border, theres a citizen waiting to hire them and benefit in some manner from their
labor. The sooner our country realizes that immigration reform should be based
upon the views of economists and nonpartisan academic researchers, rather than
think tanks and radio show hosts, then Congress will finally be able to help solve
this national dilemma.