Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

11002 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.

41 / Friday, February 29, 2008 / Rules and Regulations

the calculated effects of altitude and must also be met throughout a practical flight an adverse comment, were received
temperature; envelope; and within the comment period, the
(iv) The static longitudinal and static regulation would become effective on
* * * * * directional stability requirements of Subpart
(8) Out-of-ground effect hover February 14, 2008. No adverse
B must be met throughout a practical flight
performance determined under § 29.49 envelope.
comments were received, and thus this
and the maximum safe wind notice confirms that effective date.
* * * * *
demonstrated under the ambient Issued in College Park, GA, on February 12,
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 20, 2008.
conditions for data presented. In 2008.
addition, the maximum weight for each John D. Haley,
Robert A. Sturgell,
altitude and temperature condition at Acting Manager, System Support Group,
which the rotorcraft can safely hover Acting Administrator. Eastern Service Center.
out-of-ground-effect in winds of not less [FR Doc. E8–3817 Filed 2–28–08; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 08–875 Filed 2–28–08; 8:45 am]
than 17 knots from all azimuths. These BILLING CODE 4910–13–P BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
data must be clearly referenced to the
appropriate hover charts; and
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
* * * * *
■ 22. Amend Appendix B to Part 29 in Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration
paragraph V(b) by removing the word
‘‘cycle’’ and adding the word ‘‘cyclic’’ in 14 CFR Part 71 14 CFR Part 71
its place; and by revising paragraphs
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0104; Airspace [Docket No. FAA–0165; Airspace Docket No.
V(a) and VII(a) to read as follows: Docket No. 07–AEA–10] 07–AEA–11]
Appendix B to Part 29—Airworthiness
Criteria for Helicopter Instrument Establishment of Class E Airspace; Oil Establishment of Class E Airspace;
Flight City, PA Montrose, PA
* * * * * AGENCY: Federal Aviation AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT. Administration (FAA), DOT.
V. Static Lateral Directional Stability
ACTION: Final rule; confirmation of ACTION: Final rule; confirmation of
(a) Static directional stability must be
positive throughout the approved ranges of
effective date. effective date.
airspeed, power, and vertical speed. In
SUMMARY: This action confirms the SUMMARY: This action confirms the
straight and steady sideslips up to ±10° from
trim, directional control position must effective date of a direct final rule that effective date of a direct final rule that
increase without discontinuity with the angle establishes a Class E airspace area to establishes a Class E airspace area to
of sideslip, except for a small range of support Area Navigation (RNAV) Global support Area Navigation (RNAV) Global
sideslip angles around trim. At greater angles Positioning System (GPS) Special Positioning System (GPS) special
up to the maximum sideslip angle Instrument Approach Procedures (IAPs) Instrument Approach Procedures (IAPs)
appropriate to the type, increased directional that serve the Northwest Medical Center that serve the Montrose High School
control position must produce an increased in Oil City, PA. Heliport, Montrose, PA.
angle of sideslip. It must be possible to
DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, February 14, DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, February 14,
maintain balanced flight without exceptional
pilot skill or alertness. 2008. The Director of the Federal 2008. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by Register approves this incorporation by
* * * * *
reference action under Title 1, Code of reference action under Title 1, Code of
VII. Stability Augmentation System (SAS) Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to
(a) If a SAS is used, the reliability of the the annual revision of FAA Order the annual revision of FAA Order
SAS must be related to the effects of its 7400.9 and publication of conforming 7400.9 and publication of conforming
failure. Any SAS failure condition that amendments. amendments.
would prevent continued safe flight and
landing must be extremely improbable. It FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
must be shown that, for any failure condition Daryl Daniels, Airspace Specialist, Daryl Daniels, Airspace Specialist,
of the SAS that is not shown to be extremely System Support, AJO2–E2B.12, FAA System Support, AJO2–E2B.12, FAA
improbable— Eastern Service Center, 1701 Columbia Eastern Service Center, 1701 Columbia
(1) The helicopter is safely controllable Ave., College Park, GA 30337; telephone Ave., College Park, GA 30337; telephone
when the failure or malfunction occurs at any (404) 305–5581; fax (404) 305–5572. (404) 305–5581; fax (404) 305–5572.
speed or altitude within the approved IFR
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
operating limitations; and
(2) The overall flight characteristics of the Confirmation of Effective Date Confirmation of Effective Date
helicopter allow for prolonged instrument
flight without undue pilot effort. Additional The FAA published this direct final The FAA published this direct final
unrelated probable failures affecting the rule with a request for comments in the rule with a request for comments in the
control system must be considered. In Federal Register on December 19, 2007 Federal Register on December 13, 2007
addition— (72 FR 71762). The FAA uses the direct (72 FR 70768). The FAA uses the direct
(i) The controllability and maneuverability final rulemaking procedure for a non final rulemaking procedure for a non
requirements in Subpart B must be met controversial rule where the FAA controversial rule where the FAA
throughout a practical flight envelope;
believes that there will be no adverse believes that there will be no adverse
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES

(ii) The flight control, trim, and dynamic


stability characteristics must not be impaired public comment. This direct final rule public comment. This direct final rule
below a level needed to allow continued safe advised the public that no adverse advised the public that no adverse
flight and landing; comments were anticipated, and that comments were anticipated, and that
(iii) For Category A helicopters, the unless a written adverse comment, or a unless a written adverse comment, or a
dynamic stability requirements of Subpart B written notice of intent to submit such written notice of intent to submit such

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:40 Feb 28, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29FER1.SGM 29FER1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen