Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.
30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2008 / Notices
from Inquide requesting a new shipper
review.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b), Inquide
certified that it is both an exporter and
producer of the subject merchandise,
that it did not export subject
merchandise to the United States during
the period of the investigation (POI)
(April 1, 2003 through March 31, 2004),
and that since the investigation was
initiated, it has not been affiliated with
any producer or exporter who exported
the subject merchandise to the United
States during the POI. It also submitted
documentation establishing the date on
which it first shipped the subject
merchandise to the United States, the
volume of that shipment, and the date
of its first sale to an unaffiliated
customer in the United States. It also
certified it had no shipments to the
United States during the period
subsequent to its first shipment.
The Department conducted a Customs
database query in an attempt to confirm
that Inquide’s shipments of subject
merchandise entered the United States
for consumption and that liquidation of
such entries had been suspended for
antidumping duties. See January 31,
2008 New Shipper Review Initiation
Checklist, question 18. The Department
also examined whether U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) confirmed
that such entries were made during the
new shipper review period.
Initiation of Review
In accordance with section
751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and section
351.214(d) of the Department’s
regulations, we find that the request
Inquide submitted meets the threshold
requirements for initiation of a new
shipper review. See Memorandum to
the File from Scott Lindsay, Trade
Analyst, through Thomas Gilgunn,
Program Manager, New Shipper
Initiation Checklist, dated, January 31,
2008. Accordingly, we are initiating a
new shipper review of the antidumping
duty order on chlorinated isocyanurates
from Spain produced and exported by
Inquide. Although Inquide’s request
meets the threshold requirements for
initiation, there are a few issues of
concern that the Department has with
Inquide’s new shipper review request.
Therefore, immediately following the
initiation of this review, the Department
intends to issue a questionnaire to
Inquide to clarify these issues. This
review covers the period June 1, 2007
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
through November 30, 2007. We intend
to issue the preliminary results of this
review no later than 180 days after the
date on which this review is initiated,
and the final results within 90 days after
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:45 Feb 12, 2008 Jkt 214001
8291
the date on which we issue the
preliminary results. See section
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act.
On August 17, 2006, the Pension
Protection Act of 2006 (H.R. 4) was
signed into law. Section 1632 of H.R. 4
temporarily suspends the authority of
the Department to instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection to collect a bond
or other security in lieu of a cash
deposit in new shipper reviews.
Therefore, the posting of a bond under
section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act in lieu
of a cash deposit is not available in this
case. Importers of chlorinated
isocyanurates produced and exported by
Inquide must continue to post cash
deposits of estimated antidumping
duties on each entry of subject
merchandise (i.e., chlorinated
isocyanurates) at the current all–others
rate of 24.83 percent.
Interested parties may submit
applications for disclosure under
administrative protective order in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and
351.306.
This initiation and this notice are
issued and published in accordance
with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and
sections 351.214 and 351.221(c)(1)(i) of
the Department’s regulations.
Dated: January 31, 2008.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–2645 Filed 2–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–922]
Notice of Correction of Postponement
of Preliminary Determination of
Antidumping Duty Investigation: Raw
Flexible Magnets from the People’s
Republic of China
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 13, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Blackledge or Shawn Higgins,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3518 or (202) 482–
0679, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
CORRECTION:
On January 31, 2008, the Department
of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’)
published the notice of postponement of
the preliminary determination of the
antidumping duty investigation of raw
flexible magnets from the People’s
Republic of China. See Notice of
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination of Antidumping Duty
Investigation: Raw Flexible Magnets
from the People’s Republic of China, 73
FR 5794 (January 31, 2008)
(‘‘Postponement Notice’’). Subsequent to
the signature of the Postponement
Notice, we identified two inadvertent
errors in the above–referenced notice.
In the Postponement Notice, under
the ‘‘Postponement of Preliminary
Determination’’ section, the Department
mistakenly identified October 18, 2007,
rather than October 11, 2007, as the date
the Department initiated this
investigation. The Postponement Notice
should have stated, ‘‘On October 11,
2007, the Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) initiated the
antidumping duty investigation of raw
flexible magnets from the People’s
Republic of China. See Notice of
Initiation of Antidumping Duty
Investigations: Raw Flexible Magnets
from the People’s Republic of China and
Taiwan, 72 FR 59071 (October 18, 2007)
(‘‘Initiation Notice’’).’’ Second, in the
same section of the Postponement
Notice, the Department incorrectly
identified April 19, 2008, rather than
April 18, 2008, as the extended due date
of the preliminary determination. The
Postponement Notice should have
stated, ‘‘For the reasons identified by
the Petitioner, and because there are no
compelling reasons to deny the request,
the Department is postponing the
preliminary determination under
section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), by fifty
days from February 28, 2008 to April 18,
2008.’’
Conclusion
This notice serves to correct both the
date of initiation of this investigation
and the extended due date of the
preliminary determination as listed in
the Postponement Notice. This notice is
issued and published in accordance
with section 777(i) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended.
Dated: February 7, 2008.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–2647 Filed 2–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM 13FEN1