Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DOI 10.1007/s10560-011-0250-0
Abstract The purpose of this article is to present a best practice model for
adolescent prenatal care. Increasing rates of unplanned pregnancies coupled with
the highest rates of all age groups with inadequate prenatal care make this population especially vulnerable to birth risks and maternalinfant relational problems.
While there is much literature on individual level variables that affect prenatal care
adherence such as age, poverty, low self-esteem, and transportation, there is little
practice based research knowledge on diminishing potential birth risks by repairing
and building the maternalinfant (fetus) relationship prior to the actual birth of the
child. Using findings from the authors former study, practitioner experience, and a
review of evidence based literature, the article presents an innovative attachment
theory based prenatal care model for social work practitioners and other health care
professionals working with pregnant adolescents.
Keywords Prenatal care Attachment theory Adolescent pregnancy
Best practice adolescent prenatal care Unintended adolescent pregnancy
Adequate adolescent prenatal care Prenatal attachment
123
152
J. B. Feldman
123
153
Number or time
Percentage or mean
Age
1319 years
16.10
Single status
117
93%
Ethnicity
African American
84
65%
Latina
25
20%
Caribbean Islands
16
12%
Non-Latina, white
4%
8th12th
31% (10th)
Grade level
Gestational age
340 weeks
26.25
34
59%
33
26%
12 to 19
13.4
One
55
44%
Twothree
45
36%
Pregnancy previous
21
17%
10
8%
20
16%
76
60%
With mother
91
91%
With father
17
18%
39
42%
Age
1533 years
19.60
93
88%
44
43%
Student
33
30%
Sexual partners
Live
123
154
Table 2 Significant factors
enhancing prenatal attachment
J. B. Feldman
Independent variables
Sig T
Support expectations
.0129
.0091
.0167
Gestational age
.0337
.0786
Quickening
.3344
.3620
Self esteem
Constant
.3905
Multiple R
.57783
R2
.33389
Adjusted R2
.28060
Standard error
8.07184
6.26560
Significant F
.0000
adolescents between the ages of 1519 years of age becoming pregnant annually
(Guttmacher Institute 2006; Hamilton et al. 2007; UNICEF 2007; U.S. Department
of Health & Human Services 2008b, October 22). Latina women ages 1519 had the
highest adolescent birth rate at 82% per 10,000 compared to 41.7 per 1,000 per all
other adolescent groups (Martin et al. 2007; National Campaign to Prevent Teen
Pregnancy 2009, January).
Statistics on adolescent pregnancy (Guttmacher Institute 2006; Hamilton et al.
2007; National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy 2009, January) have focused
on individual level variables such as income, age, education, and transportation as
being problematic to obtaining prenatal care. A broader research agenda is needed
that includes the context and the culture through which pregnancies occur.
Health care groups maintain that adequate traditional prenatal care is the most
effective approach for lowering pregnancy and birth risks (American Academy of
Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2007; Annie E.
Casey Foundation 2009; Guttmacher Institute 2003; U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services 2010). However, adequate prenatal care follows a traditional
medical model of care, often unappealing to adolescents, beginning within the first
trimester of pregnancy and consisting of at least 80109% of recommended visits
(American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2007; U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services 2000, April, 2008a, October 15). Adolescents under the
age of 20 had the worst rate of any age group at 56.5% for initiating early prenatal
care (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2007a, b).
While the adolescent attachment literature is increasing (Ammaniti et al. 2007;
Bailey et al. 2007; Diamond et al. 2007; Long 2009; Scharf and Mayseless 2007),
there is a lack of information addressing attachment at the prenatal stage of
development. This article uses an attachment theory framework to present a model
123
155
for prenatal care for adolescents. The reasoning to use the attachment perspective is
based on the premise that the quality of the mothers responsiveness to her infants
gestures profoundly affects the infants development (Ainsworth et al. 1978;
Bowlby 1969, 1980, 1988; Sroufe et al. 2005).
123
156
J. B. Feldman
care received, circumstances with other attachment figures, and from her own
mothers representations of early attachment experiences (Main and Hesse 1990;
Main and Solomon 1990; Pajulo et al. 2006; Roisman et al. 2005).
Reliance on parents as main attachment figures decreases for the adolescent, but
does not necessarily cease, as the peer group or social network functions as a secure
base providing an important source of support (Ammaniti et al. 2007; Levitt et al.
1993; Scharf and Mayseless 2007). Adolescents with secure attachments are better
prepared to work through the challenges of the adolescent stage (Belsky 1999;
Cooper et al. 1998; Kobak et al. 1993; Kobak and Sceery 1988; Sroufe et al. 2005).
Avoidant adolescents and those with insecure-disorganized attachment patterns may
shun or seek out casual or exploitative encounters. Anxious adolescents, as they
crave closeness, are prone to risky sexual experiences (Ammaniti et al. 2007).
Adolescents coming from difficult home situations have a much harder time
working through the normal separation from the secure base (parents) (Levitt
2005; Moran et al. 2005). It follows that understanding the adolescents attachment
patters during pregnancy is essential.
Adolescent Pregnancy Viewpoint
Adolescent births profoundly alter the mothers developmental course occurring at
an untimely period of life when she is cognitively unprepared to parent (Black et al.
2006; Mayers et al. 2008), As she struggles to gain independence from her own
parent, the pregnancy frequently causes her to become more dependent causing
conflicts, depression, and rage at her caregiver(s) with less or inappropriate attention
given to the developing infant (Terry-Humen et al. 2005; Mayers and Siegler 2004;
Larson 2004).
The relationship the adolescent has with her developing infant is influenced by
attachment experiences she had and is having with her own mother, her view of
herself as a parent, and other significant attachments she has formed. These maternal
representations or prenatal expectations are activated during pregnancy and can
serve to help or hinder the mothers care of her expectant child as well as have an
impact on the caregiving and subsequent infant/childs attachment organization
(Sroufe et al. 2005; Stern 1995; Zeanah 2007). Helping the mother become more
sensitive and aware of how her own maternal representations affect her mothering
gives her a better understanding of how her own care of her child is influenced by
her past experiences. This enables her understand the need to explore her own
maternal relationship in order to be a better parent (Fraiberg et al. 1975; Lounds
et al. 2005; National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy 2005).
123
157
Quantitative Process
The intake process would include a combination of quantitative and qualitative
methods. The demographic data would include questions related to the studys
significant findings of gestational age, quickening, and other living in home
receiving financial benefits. Instruments would be administered and scored
according to the particular developers method. The Support Expectations Index
(Levitt 1991) would be administered with resulting scores ranging from a low of .00
indicating no expectations to a high of 84.00 indicating high expectations.
Scores of 42.00 and higher would indicate the extent of expectations was frequent
or occasional while scores of 42.00 and below would indicate minimal or no
expectations and be considered in need of attention due to having little
perceived support available.
The Prenatal Attachment Inventory (PAI) (Muller 1989) would be given to
determine extent of prenatal attachment. The PAI scores range from a possible
21.00 (low attachment) to possible 84.00 (high attachment). Scores of 69.00 and
higher would be considered adequately attached while scores of 54.00 and below
would be considered in need of attention.
Factors related to Self esteem would be assessed according to the Rosenberg selfesteem (RSE) (Rosenberg 1994) instrument. Scores range from .00 to 100.0 with
higher scores indicating problems with self-esteem. This well-known measure has a
Guttman Scale coefficient of reproducibility of .92 indicating excellent stability.
The relationship with ones one mother would be obtained through the Childs
Attitude Toward Mother (CAM) (Hudson 1993). The CAM scores range from .00 to
100 with scores higher than 30 indicative of problems. The instrument has a mean
alpha score of .94.
Qualitative Process
During the intake process, open ended questions would be asked of the adolescent in
order to better understand the meaning of certain variables such as planning the
pregnancy and intention of pregnancy. Semi-structured interviews would give
the adolescent an opportunity to talk about her history, family, significant others,
and other personal situations. A major focus will be on what choices, if any, she had
about the pregnancy, who may have been some of the leading family members or
non-related individuals, and/or cultural factors influencing the pregnancy. This area
would add information to the definition of intention of pregnancy which presently
is narrow in scope and refers to the womans conscious decision at the time of
conception. She would also be able to speak about the meaning of friendships and/or
the impact of social isolation due to the pregnancy. The adolescent would be asked
to draw and elaborate on a series of concentric figures as she named the individuals
closest to her as closest to her center according to the Support Expectations
Model (Kahn and Antonucci 1980; Levitt 2005). The interviews would allow the
adolescent to present information freely and add important material to the structured
measurements.
123
158
J. B. Feldman
123
159
2004; Schwartz et al. 2005; Smokowski and Bacallao 2007). For example, 17 year
old pregnant Latina arriving to one her parenting classes remarked to the counselor:
I want my mother coming in with me. She is my mother. I have no secrets
from her. She has to hear what the doctor says so she can ask him the
questions. We are a family, we have no secrets. You are asking me to be
disloyal. I cant do that! I would be ashamed to go on without her. Even
though I have been in this country over ten years, it is important for me to
involve my family in my care. That way they can help me. We stick together.
Placement in a group setting would function to ameliorate maternal attachment
disturbances by integrating the following attachment-related concepts: (1) to serve
as a supportive framework to provide a safe haven in which new feelings and
experiences are tested, (2) to explore and modify internal working models of self
and others, (3) to encourage awareness and working through of past and present
hurts, (4) to encourage sensitivity and responsiveness toward pregnancy/infant
signals, and (5) to provide a peer group to serve as attachment figures. As pregnant
adolescents tend to be isolated from the mainstream of adolescent life as well as
suffer from feelings of shame, the group provides a support system where she can
feel part of a community of others. Enhancing current and developing new support
relationships enables group members to use these relationships outside of group and
in the future when the baby is born. One 15 year old African American pregnant
adolescent with Latina ancestry attending a prenatal clinic for adolescents remarked
to a group member:
I really hated to come here at the beginning. I feel so embarrassed about my
pregnancy. My family says I have brought shame and dishonor to everyone. I
am not allowed to go to church with them anymore. All the time they told me
that having a baby is the most important thing a girl can do but they did not tell
me how not to have a baby! They say I have to hide away for months, forget
everyone, and pretend I am not pregnant. I dont want to be ashamed. Some
girls in this group feel exactly the way I do and that is why I come. This group
helps me out and I am now glad that I come here.
The group leader serves as a safe haven figure who allows the group members
to test out painful feelings simultaneously being available to provide comfort, as
needed. The leader is instrumental in functioning as an attachment-support giving
person and helps the members connect to other support person(s) in the group
during times of fear or need as they deal with their uncomfortable feelings. She/he
encourages the support expectations person(s) to be responsively attentive to the
particular adolescent member working through traumas. Concurrently the adolescent members are integrating new experiences that help them become more
sensitive to their pregnancy and responsive to their infant (fetus) signals.
Focusing on early traumas that continue to influence the pregnant adolescent
behavior will give her the opportunity to work through these issues with peers but
under the guidance of a trained professional. It is well known that the peer group is
influential at the adolescent stage of development, however, the adolescents
cognitive capacity to plan, understand ramifications of behavior, control impulses is
123
160
J. B. Feldman
still not fully developed (Bailey et al. 2007; Bettmann and Jasperon 2010).
Discussions of loss or trauma can result in disorganization and disorientation. As the
adolescent is testing and exploring new avenues, she is offered the security, safety,
and protection by the leader. This helps to reduce the adolescents anxiety and fear.
Adolescents who have experienced childhood maltreatment and trauma are
generally classified with having an unresolved/disorganized/disoriented attachment.
Maltreatment that occurs within the family context is usually chronic and
cumulative. These adolescents have difficulty integrating past memories and
experiences. They frequently display lapses in conversation when discussing painful
issues. The adolescent sees others as untrustworthy and likely harmful (Long 2009).
The group would be used to provide an alternative experience for the adolescent so
that she may become more able to discuss her traumas without fear of depression. A
leader commented to a group of pregnant adolescents in a community health clinic:
Some of you are frightened to talk about these issues. It hurts all over again.
This is understandable. We will do it slowly and no one is forced to discuss
anything they do not want. I am interested in helping you. I am here to listen
and help to try to make these things less painful. I know how hard it can be.
While it would be simplistic to assume that an attentive supportive leader would
be able to break through all difficult barriers, it is a step forward. Some research has
demonstrated that shorter term intervention focused on the quality of the mothers
responsiveness to her infant have been found to be more effective than modifying the mothers representational structure of herself and others (BakermansKranenburg et al. 2003; van IJzendoorn et al. 1995). However, other research
affirms that building the mothers sensitivity and responsiveness to her infant
necessitates gaining awareness and re-experiencing attachment pattern to her own
mother (Moran et al. 2005; Long 2009). For some of these adolescents, being heard
and listened to regarding their thoughts about the pregnancy and future child is a
new experience. In response to the leaders comments above, a 16 year old Latina
group member stated:
You know, nobody ever listened to me, everybody just yells at me. Nobody
even asks me what I think. You ask me about my baby. I can talk about how
scared I am of her, will she be born o.k.? Will I know how to raise her? My
mother never asked me anything; she just slapped me and pushed me. I dont
even remember what was so horrible but it was.
The leader helps the adolescents re-experience earlier traumas and to make the
connection between being a parent and being parented. As Fraiberg et al. (1975)
stated when our therapy has brought the parent to remember and reexperience his
childhood anxiety and suffering, the ghosts depart, and the afflicted parents become
the protectors of their children against repetition of their own conflicted past
(pp. 420421). A 15 year old Chinese American adolescent remarked after the birth
of her baby said to the hospital birthing center social worker:
If it wasnt for my other social worker, I would never understand why I felt so
afraid all the time that I was pregnant. My mother always told me that she was
123
161
afraid of me because I was such a problem child. She was always strict with
me. Chinese mothers are so strict! Now I understand that it was because my
mom thinks that all babies are trouble and it is not how I feel. My social
worker calls it the ghosts in the nursery that have to be sent away!
123
162
J. B. Feldman
were wrong and harmful (Trenholm et al. 2007, April; Guttmacher Institute 2007,
Spring). The Obama administration has demonstrated a more realistic, scientific
approach toward sex education and planning for adolescents (Barot 2009, Winter).
It is the premise of this article to state that working through attachment
difficulties may enhance prenatal care attendance. The author seeks to present an
attachment relational intervention pathway for pregnant adolescents through which
difficulties can be re-worked that could potentially enhance prenatal care adherence
and lead to healthier pregnancies and births. Future studies would necessitate
exploring whether indeed using the articles best practice framework does indeed
increase attachment (adherence) to prenatal care and lower birth risks.
The current challenge is to obtain funding for research and program implementation for the adolescent population that addresses realistic, easily accessible family
planning and contraceptive education. This is a population that does not vote and
has little clout. The responsibility is ours, as health professionals and social workers,
to give them voice.
References
Ainsworth, M. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E. D., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment assessed in the
Strange Situation and at home. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2007).
Guidelines for perinatal care (6th ed.). Evanston: Author.
Ammaniti, M., Nicolais, G., & Speranza, A. M. (2007). Attachment and sexuality during adolescence:
Interaction, integration, or interference. In D. Diamond, S. J. Blatt, & J. D. Lichternberg (Eds.),
Attachment & sexuality (pp. 79105). NY: The Analytic Press.
Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2008). Kids count data book. Baltimore: Author.
Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2009). Kids count data book. Baltimore: Author.
Bailey, H. N., Moran, G., & Pederson, D. R. (2007). Childhood maltreatment, complex trauma symptoms,
and unresolved attachment in an at-risk sample of adolescent mothers. Attachment & Human
Development, 9(2), 139161.
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van Ijzendoorn, J., & Juffer, F. (2003). Less is more: Meta-analyses of
sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 195215.
Barot, S. (2009, Winter). Reclaiming the lead: Restoring U.S. leadership in global sexual and
reproductive health policy. Guttmacher Policy Review, 12(1). Retrieved April 14, 2009, from
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr120112.html
Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2004). The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. NeuroImage, 21,
11561166.
Belsky, J. (1999). Model evolutionary theory and patterns of attachment. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver
(Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications (pp. 141161). New
York: Guilford Press.
Bettmann, J. E., & Jasperson, R. A. (2010). Anxiety in adolescence: Integration of attachment and
neurobiological research into clinical practice. Clinical Social Work, 38, 98106.
Bielawska-Batorowicz, E., & Siddiqui, A. (2008). A study of prenatal attachment with Swedish and
Polish expectant mothers. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 26(4), 373384.
Black, M. M., Bentley, M. E., Papas, M. A., Oberlander, S., Teti, L. O., McNary, S., et al. (2006).
Delaying second births among adolescent mothers: A randomized, controlled trial of a home-based
mentoring program. Pediatrics, 118(4), 10871099.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: attachment (Vol. 1). New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Loss, sadness and depression (Vol. 3). New York: Basic Books,
Inc.
123
163
Bowlby, J. (1988). Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect. Society for Research in Child
Development, 50(12), 335.
Child Trends. (2007a, May). The consequences of unintended childbearing: A white paper. Retrieved
December 22, 2008, from http://www.childtrends.org
Child Trends. (2007b, Winter). Late or no prenatal care. Retrieved October 24, 2008, from
http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/indicators/25PrenatalCare.cfm
Coffman, S., Levitt, M. J., & Brown, L. (1994). Effects of clarification of support expectations in prenatal
couples. Nursing Research, 43(2), 111116.
Coffman, S., Levitt, M. J., & Guacci-Franco, N. (1995). Infant-mother attachment: Relationships to
maternal responsiveness and infant temperament. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 10(1), 917.
Condon, J. T. (1993). The assessment of antenatal emotional attachment: Developments of a
questionnaire instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 66, 167183.
Cooper, M. L., Shaver, P. R., & Collins, N. L. (1998). Attachment styles, emotion regulation, and
adjustment in adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 13801397.
Deutch, H. (1945). The psychology of women. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Diamond, D., Blatt, S. J., & Lichtenberg, J. D. (2007). Attachment and sexuality. New York: The Analytic
Press.
Feldman, J. B. (2007). The effect of support expectations on prenatal attachment: An evidence- based
approach for intervention in an adolescent population. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal,
24(3), 209234.
Feldman, J. B., & Pittman, S. (2008). Adolescent pregnancy along the TexasMexico border: A
systematic analysis of risk and resiliency in a Mexican-American population. Social Perspectives,
10(1), 2952.
Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006). Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States,
1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38(2), 9096.
Fraiberg, S., Adelson, E., & Shapiro, V. (1975). Ghosts in the nursery: A psychoanalytic approach to the
problems of impaired infantmother relationships. Journal of the American Academy of Child
Psychiatry, 14(3), 397421.
Guilamo-Ramos, V., Dittus, P., Jaccard, J., Goldberg, V., Casillas, E., & Bouris, A. (2006). The content
and process of motheradolescent communication about sex in Latino families. Social Work
Research, 30(3), 169181.
Guttmacher Institute. (2003). Teen pregnancy: Trends and lessons learned (Issue Brief No.1). New York:
Guttmacher Institute.
Guttmacher Institute. (2006). U.S. teenage pregnancy statistics: National and state trends and trends by
race and ethnicity. New York: Guttmacher Institute.
Guttmacher Institute. (2007, Spring). The case for a new approach to sex education mounts: Will
policymakers heed the message? Retrieved November 23, 2008, from http://www.gutt
macher.org/pubs/
Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2007). Births: Preliminary data for 2006. National vital
statistics report 56(7). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
Hudson, W. W. (1993). Childs attitude toward mother (CAM). Tempe: WALMYR Publishing Co.
Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles, and social
support. In P. Baltes & O. Brim (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (pp. 253286). San
Diego: Academic Press.
Kobak, R. R., Cole, H. E., Ferenz-Gillies, R., & Fleming, W. S. (1993). Attachment and emotion
regulation during mother-teen problem solving: A control theory analysis. Child Development, 64,
231245.
Kobak, R. R., & Sceery, A. (1988). Attachment in adolescence: Working models, affect regulation, and
representations of self and others. Child Development, 59, 135146.
Larson, N. C. (2004). Parenting stress among adolescent mothers in the transition to adulthood. Child and
Adolescent Social Work Journal, 21(5), 457476.
Levitt, M. J. (1991). Attachment and close relationships: A life span perspective. In J. L. Gerwitz &
W. F. Kurtines (Eds.), Intersections with attachment (pp. 183206). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Levitt, M. J. (2005). Social relations in childhood and adolescence: The convoy model perspective.
Human Development, 48, 2847.
Levitt, M. J., Guacci-Franco, N., & Levitt, J. L. (1993). Convoys of social support in childhood and early
adolescence: Structure and function. Development Psychology, 29(5), 811818.
123
164
J. B. Feldman
Long, M. S. (2009). Disorganized attachment relationships in infants of adolescent mothers and factors
that may augment positive outcomes. Adolescence, 44(175), 621633.
Lounds, J. J., Borkowski, J. G., Whitman, T. L., Maxwell, S. E., & Weed, K. (2005). Adolescent
pregnancy and attachment during infancy and early childhood. Parenting: Science and Practice,
5(1), 91118.
Main, M., & Hesse, E. (1990). Parents unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant
disorganized attachment status: Is frightened and frightening parental behaviors the linking
mechanism? In M. Greenberg, D. Cichetti, & M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool
years (pp. 161182). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Precursors for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the
Ainsworth Strange Situation. In M. Greenberg, D. Cichetti, & M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in
the preschool years (pp. 121160). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Martin, J. A.; Hamilton, B. E.; Sutton, P. D.; Ventura, S. J.; Menacher, F.; Kirmeyer, S. et al. (2007).
Birth: Final data for 2005. National Vital Statistics Reports, 56(6).
Mayers, H. A., Hager-Budny, M., & Buckner, E. B. (2008). The chances for children teen-parentinfant
project: Results of a pilot intervention for teen mothers and their infants in inner city high schools.
Infant Mental Health, 29(4), 320342.
Mayers, H. A., & Siegler, A. (2004). Finding each other: Using a psychoanalytic-developmental
perspective to build understanding between teenage mothers and their babies. Journal of Infant,
Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 3, 444465.
McHatton, P. A., Shaunessy, E., Hughes, C., Brice, A., & Ratliff, M. A. (2007). You gotta represent!
Ethnic identity development among Hispanic adolescents. Multicultural Perspectives, 9(3), 1220.
Moran, G., Pederson, D. R., & Krupka, A. (2005). Maternal unresolved attachment status impedes the
effectiveness of interventions with adolescent mothers. Infant Mental Health Journal, 25(3),
231249.
Muir, J. A., Schwartz, S. J., & Szapocznik, J. (2004). A program of research with Hispanic and African
American families: Three decades of intervention development and testing influenced by the
changing cultural context of Miami. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30(3), 285303.
Muller, M. E. (1989). The development and testing of the Muller Prenatal Attachment Inventory.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 08B. (UMI No. 8926411).
National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. (2005). The adolescent brain: A work in progress.
Retrieved April 23, 2009, from http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/resources/pdf/BRAIN.pdf
National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. (2006, October). By the numbers: The public costs of teen
childbearing. Retrieved July 24, 2008, from http://thenationalcampaign.org/resources
National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. (2009, January). Teen birth rates in the United State:
January 2009. Retrieved January 10, 2009, from http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/resources/
birthdata/analysis.aspx
National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. (n.d.). What works: Curriculum-based programs that
prevent teen pregnancy. Retrieved April 18, 2008, from http://www.teenpregnancy.org/resources/
reading/pdf/WhatWorks.pdf
Pajulo, M., Helenious, H., & Mayes, L. (2006). Prenatal views of baby and parenthood: Associations with
sociodemographic and pregnancy factors. Infant Mental Health Journal, 27(3), 229250.
Polansky, M., Lauterbach, W., Litzke, C., Coulter, B., & Sommers, L. (2006). A qualitative study of an
attachment-based parenting group for mothers with drug addictions: On being and having a mother.
Journal of Social Work Practice, 20(2), 115131.
Public Health Service (PHS). (1989). Caring for our future: Content of prenatal care. Washington:
Department of Health and Human Services.
Quinlivan, J. A., & Evans, S. F. (2005). Impact of domestic violence and drug abuse in pregnancy on
maternal attachment and infant temperament in teenage smothers in the setting of best clinical
practice. Archives of Womens Mental Health, 8, 191198.
Rodriguez, N., Bingham-Mira, C., Paez, N. D., & Myers, H. F. (2007). Exploring the complexities of
familism and acculturation: Central constructs for people of Mexican origin. American Journal of
Psychology, 39, 6177.
Roisman, G. I., Collins, W. A., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (2005). Predictors of young adults
representations of and behavior in their current romantic relationships: Prospective tests of the
prototype hypothesis. Attachment and Human Development, 7(2), 105121.
Rosenberg, M. (1994). Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). In J. Fischer & K. Corcoran (Eds.), Measures
for clinical practice: Couples, families, and children (p. 518). New York: The Free Press.
123
165
Rubin, R. (1973). Liking and loving. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
Rubin, R. (1975). Maternal tasks of pregnancy. Maternal-Child Nursing Journal, 4, 143153.
Ryan, S., Franzetta, K., & Manlove, J. M. (2005). Hispanic teen pregnancy and birth rates: Looking
behind the numbers. Child Trends Research Briefs. Retrieved February 23, 2009, from
http://www.childtrends.org/Files/HispanicRB.pdf
Sangalang, B. B., Barth, R. P., & Painter, J. S. (2006). First-birth outcomes and timing of second births: A
statewide case management program for adolescent mothers. Health and Social Work, 31(1), 5463.
Santelli, J., Roche, R., Hatfield-Timachy, K., Colley-Gilbert, B., Curtis, K., Cabral, R., et al. (2003). The
measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive
Health, 35(2), 94101.
Scharf, M., & Mayseless, O. (2007). Putting eggs in more than one basket: A new look at developmental
processes of attachment in adolescence. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development,
117, 235269.
Schwartz, S. J., Pantn, H., Prado, G., Sullivan, S., & Szapocznik, J. (2005). Family functioning, identity,
and problem behavior in hispanic immigrant early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(4),
392420.
Smokowski, P., & Bacallao, M. (2007). Acculturation, internalizing mental health symptoms, and selfesteem: Cultural experiences of Latino adolescents in North Carolina. Child Psychiatry and Human
Development, 37(3), 273292.
Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., Carlson, E. A., & Collins, W. A. (2005). The development of the person: The
Minnesota study of risk and adaptation from birth to adulthood. New York: Guilford Press.
Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Science,
9, 8399.
Stern, D. N. (1995). The motherhood constellation. New York: Harper.
Terry-Humen, E., Manlove, J., & Moore, K. A. (2005). Playing catch-up: How children born to teen
mothers fare. Washington: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.
Trenholm, C., Devaney, B., Fortson, K., Quail, L., Wheeler, J., & Clark, M. (2007). Impacts of four Title
V abstinence education programs: Final report. Princeton: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
UNICEF (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries.
Innocenti Report Card 7. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2000).
Healthy people 2010: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives (DHSS
Publication No. PHS 91-50212). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of
Vital Statistics. (2000, April). Report of the panel to evaluate the U.S. standard certificates.
Retrieved November 13, 2008, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/vital_certs_rev.htm
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National
Vital Statistics System. (2005a). 2002 National survey of family growth, series 23, no. 25.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National
Vital Statistics System. (2005b). Teen births. Retrieved July 22, 2008, from http://www.cdc.gov/
nchs/fastats/teenbrth.htm
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National
Vital Statistics Report. (2006). Births: Final data for 2004. Retrieved December, 12, 2008, from
http://cdc.gov/nchs/data/mvsr
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National
Vital Statistics Report (2007a). Births: Final data for 2005. Retrieved October 10, 2008, from
http://cdc.gov/nchs/data/mvsr
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National
Center for Health Statistics. (2007b). NCHS releases preliminary birth data. Retrieved December
13, 2008, from http://thenationalcampaign.org/resources/birthdata.aspx
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National
Vital Statistics System. (2008a, October 15). 2003 revisions of the U.S. standard certificate of live
birth and death and the fetal death report. Retrieved December 15, 2008, from http://www.cdc.
gov/nchs/vital_certs_rev.htm
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National
Vital Statistics System (2008b, October 22). NCHS data brief. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/briefs/
123
166
J. B. Feldman
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National
Vital Statistics System. (2009, January 7). Births: Final data for 2006. Retrieved March 3, 2009,
from http://www.cdc.gov.nchs/data/nvsr
U.S. Department of Health, & Human Services, Centers for Disease Control Prevention. (2010). Healthy
people 2010: National health promotion and disease prevention Objectives. Washington: U.S.
Government Printing Office.
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.).
PRAMS and unintended pregnancy. Retrieved December 24, 2008, from http://www.cdc.gov/
prams/up/htm
van IJzendoorn, M. H., Juffer, F., & Duyvesteyn, M. G. C. (1995). Breaking the intergenerational cycle of
insecure attachment: A review of the effects of attachment-based interventions on maternal
sensitivity and infant security. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 225248.
Vedova-Della, A. M., Debrassi, F., & Imbasciati, A. (2008). Assessing prenatal care in a sample of Italian
women. Journal of Reproductive & Infant Psychology, 26(20), 8698.
Ventura, S. J., Mosher, W.D., Curtin, S.C., Abna, J.C., & Henshaw, S. (2004, June 15). Estimated
pregnancy rates for the United States, 19902000: An update. National Vital Statistics Report,
52(23). Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics.
Vexler, E. (2007). Voices heard: Latino adults and teens speak up about teen pregnancy. Washington:
National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.
Zeanah, C. H. (2007). Constructing a relationship formulation for mother and child: Clinical application
of the Working Model Interview. In D. Oppenheim & D. F. Goldsmith (Eds.), Attachment theory in
clinical work with children: Bridging the gap between research and practice (pp. 330). New York:
The Guilford Press.
123