3238 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.
12 / Thursday, January 17, 2008 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–913]
Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
Tires From the People’s Republic of
China: Alignment of Final
Countervailing Duty Determination
With Final Antidumping Duty
Determination
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is aligning the final
determination in the countervailing
duty investigation of certain new
pneumatic off-the-road tires (OTR Tires)
from the People’s Republic of China
(PRC) with the final determination in
the companion antidumping
investigation.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 17, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Hoadley, Jack Zhao, or Nicholas
Czajkowski, AD/CVD Operations, Office
6, Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3148,
(202) 482–1396, and (202) 482–1395,
respectively.
Background: On August 7, 2007, the
Department initiated the countervailing
duty and antidumping duty
investigations on OTR Tires from PRC.
See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-
Road Tires From the People’s Republic
of China: Initiation of Countervailing
Duty Investigation, 72 FR 44122 (August
7, 2007), and Initiation of Antidumping
Duty Investigation: Certain New
Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the
People’s Republic of China, 72 FR 43591
(August 7, 2007). The countervailing
duty and antidumping duty
investigations have the same scope with
regard to the subject merchandise
covered. On December 17, 2007, the
Department published the preliminary
affirmative countervailing duty
determination pertaining to OTR Tires
from the PRC. See Certain New
Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination, 72 FR 71360 (December
17, 2007). On December 11, 2007, the
petitioners, Titan Tire Corporation and
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
United Steel, Paper and Forestry,
Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy Allied
Industrial and Service Workers
International Union, AFL–CIO–CLC,
submitted a letter, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.210(b)(4), requesting alignment of
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:07 Jan 16, 2008 Jkt 214001
the final countervailing duty
determination with the final
determination in the companion
antidumping duty investigation of OTR
Tires from the PRC.
Therefore, in accordance with section
705(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(4), we are aligning the final
countervailing duty determination on
OTR Tires from the PRC with the final
determinations in the companion
antidumping duty investigation of OTR
Tires from the PRC. The final
countervailing duty determination will
be issued on the same date as the final
antidumping duty determination
currently scheduled for April 21, 2008,
the first business day following the
April 20, 2008 deadline for the final
antidumping duty determination.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 705(a)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 10, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–790 Filed 1–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 08–C0002]
Stamina Products, Inc., a Corporation,
Provisional Acceptance of a
Settlement Agreement and Order
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: It is the policy of the
Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the
Consumer Product Safety Act in the
Federal Register in accordance with the
terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). Published
below is a provisionally-accepted
Settlement Agreement with Stamina
Products, Inc., a corporation, containing
a civil penalty of $105,000.
DATES: Any interested person may ask
the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its
contents by filing a written request with
the Office of the Secretary by February
1, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to
comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the
Comment 08–0002, Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Room 502, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–
4408.
PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis C. Kacoyanis; Trial Attorney,
Office of Compliance and Field
Operations, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814–4408;
telephone (301) 504–7587.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of
the Agreement and Order appears
below.
Dated: January 14, 2008.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
In the Matter of Stamina Products, Inc., a
corporation.
CPSC Docket No. 08–C0002
I. Settlement Agreement and Order
1. This Settlement Agreement is made
by and between the staff (‘‘the staff’’) of
the U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission (‘‘the Commission’’) and
Stamina Products, Inc. (‘‘Stamina’’), a
corporation, in accordance with the
Commission’s Procedures for
Investigations, Inspections, and
Inquiries under the Consumer Product
Safety Act (‘‘CPSA’’), 16 CFR 1118.20.
This Settlement Agreement and the
incorporated attached Order settle the
staff’s allegations set forth below.
II. The Parties
2. The Commission is an independent
federal regulatory agency responsible for
the enforcement of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2051–2084.
3. Stamina is a corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State
of Missouri, with its principal corporate
office located in Springfield, MO. At all
times relevant, Stamina imported and/or
distributed exercise equipment and
sporting and recreational products.
II. Allegations of the Staff
4. Between August 2000 and March
2006, Stamina imported for sale
nationwide approximately 668,000 In-
Motion Trampolines (‘‘trampolines’’),
Model Numbers 35–1625, 35–1625A–
LC, 35–1625AW, and 36–1625AW–LC.
5. The trampolines are ‘‘consumer
products’’ and, at the times relevant
herein, Stamina was a ‘‘manufacturer’’
of those consumer products, which were
‘‘distributed in commerce,’’ as those
terms are defined in sections 3(a)(1), (4),
(11), and (12) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2052(a)(1), (4), (11), and (12).
6. The trampolines are defective
because the trampoline’s folding/
unfolding instructions did not
adequately warn consumers of the
hazards resulting from use of the
product.
7. On or about April 11, 2002,
Stamina received a report from a
17JAN1