Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Notices 68123

(202) 606–9853, via the Internet at establishments in the same industries administrative review of sales of
Maria.Borga@bea.gov, or by fax on (202) and same host countries as the foreign stainless steel wire rods made by
606–5318. affiliates. Sunflag Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EFFECTIVE DATE: (December 4, 2007.
Data Access and Confidentiality
Background FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Title 22, U.S.C. 3104 protects the
Edythe Artman, AD/CVD Enforcement,
CIPSEA (Pub. L. 107–347, Title V) and confidentiality of the data to be
Office 5, Import Administration,
the International Investment and Trade provided by BEA to BLS. The data may
International Trade Administration,
in Services Survey Act (Pub. L. 94–472, be seen only by persons sworn to
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
22 United States Code (U.S.C.) 3101– uphold the confidentiality of the
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
3108) allow BEA and BLS to share information. Access to the shared data
Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202)
certain business data for exclusively will be restricted to specifically
482–3931.
statistical purposes. Section 524(d) of authorized personnel and will be
provided for statistical purposes only. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the CIPSEA requires a Federal Register
notice announcing the intent to share Any results of this research are subject Background
data (allowing 60 days for public to BEA disclosure protection. All BLS
On September 12, 2007, the
comment), since BEA respondents were employees with access to these data will
Department of Commerce (the
required by law to report the data. become BEA Special Sworn
Department) published the preliminary
Section 524(d) also requires us to Employees—meaning that they, under
results of the administrative review of
provide information about the terms of penalty of law, must uphold the data’s
the antidumping duty order on stainless
the agreement for data sharing. For confidentiality.
steel wire rods from India and a notice
purposes of this notice, BEA has
J. Steven Landefeld, of intent to rescind the antidumping
decided to group these terms by three
Director, Bureau of Economic Analysis. duty administrative review in part. See
categories.
The categories are: [FR Doc. E7–23506 Filed 12–3–07; 8:45 am] Stainless Steel Wire Rods from India:
• Shared data. BILLING CODE 3510–06–P Preliminary Results of Antidumping
• Statistical purposes for the shared Duty Administrative Review and Notice
data. of Intent to Rescind Antidumping Duty
• Data access and confidentiality. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Administrative Review in Part, 72 FR
52079 (September 12, 2007). We invited
Shared Data International Trade Administration interested parties to comment on the
BEA proposes to provide BLS with [A–533–808] preliminary results but received no
data from its surveys of U.S. direct comments from the parties.
investment abroad, foreign direct Stainless Steel Wire Rods from India: Rescission of Review in Part
investment in the United States, and Final Results of Antidumping Duty
U.S. international services transactions. Administrative Review and Notice of In the preliminary results of review,
BLS will use these data for statistical Rescission of Antidumping Duty we stated our intent to rescind the
purposes exclusively. Administrative Review in Part administrative review with respect to
sales of stainless steel wire rods (wire
Statistical Purposes for the Shared Data AGENCY: Import Administration, rods) made by Sunflag Iron & Steel Co.,
Data collected in BEA’s surveys of International Trade Administration, Ltd. (Sunflag), during the period of
direct investment are used to develop Department of Commerce. review because we had initiated a new–
estimates of the financing and SUMMARY: On September 12, 2007, the shipper review of these sales. See
operations of U.S. parent companies, Department of Commerce published the Stainless Steel Wire Rod from India:
their foreign affiliates, and U.S. affiliates preliminary results of an administrative Notice of Initiation of Antidumping
of foreign companies, and estimates of review of the antidumping duty order Duty New–Shipper Review, 72 FR 13088
transactions between parents and on stainless steel wire rods from India (March 20, 2007). We thus preliminarily
affiliates. Data collected in BEA’s and a notice of intent to rescind the determined that it was appropriate to
surveys of U.S. international services antidumping duty administrative review rescind the administrative review with
transactions are used to develop in part. The administrative review respect to Sunflag pursuant to 19 CFR
estimates of services transactions currently covers one manufacturer/ 351.214(j), which permits a rescission
between U.S. persons (in a broad legal exporter, Mukand Ltd., and the review when there are multiple reviews of the
sense, including companies) and foreign period is December 1, 2005, through sales of a company.
persons. These estimates are published November 30, 2006. We stated our We received no comments from
in the Survey of Current Business, BEA’s intent to rescind the review with respect interested parties concerning our intent
monthly journal; in other BEA to the manufacturer/exporter Sunflag to rescind. Because Sunflag’s sales are
publications; and on BEA’s Web site at Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., in our preliminary subject to a new–shipper review, we are
http://www.bea.gov/. All data are results.We have received no comments rescinding the administrative review
collected under sections 3101–3108, of from interested parties on our with respect to Sunflag pursuant to 19
Title 22, U.S.C. preliminary results. We have made no CFR 351.214(j).
The shared data will be used for changes to our calculations for the final
several exclusively statistical purposes results of review and, accordingly, have Scope of the Order
by both agencies, such as the production found that Mukand Ltd. made sales at The merchandise under review is
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

of price indexes for imported and less than normal value in the U.S. wire rods, which are hot–rolled or hot–
exported services and the making of market. The final weighted–average rolled annealed and/or pickled rounds,
international comparisons between the dumping margin for this company is squares, octagons, hexagons or other
hourly compensation costs at the foreign listed below in the section entitled shapes, in coils. Wire rods are made of
affiliates of U.S. multinational ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ In alloy steels containing, by weight, 1.2
companies and the average costs for addition, we have rescinded the percent or less of carbon and 10.5

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:38 Dec 03, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM 04DEN1
68124 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Notices

percent or more of chromium, with or instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed Failure to comply with the regulations
without other elements. These products entries at the all–others rate if there is and the terms of an administrative
are only manufactured by hot–rolling no rate for the intermediate protective order is a sanctionable
and are normally sold in coiled form, company(ies) involved in the violation.
and are of solid cross section. The transaction. We are issuing and publishing this
majority of wire rods sold in the United notice in accordance with sections
Cash–Deposit Requirements
States are round in cross-section shape, 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
annealed, and pickled. The most The following deposit requirements
Dated: November 27, 2007.
common size is 5.5 millimeters in will be effective upon publication of
this notice of final results of David M. Spooner,
diameter.
administrative review for all shipments Assistant Secretary for Import
The wire rods subject to this order are
of the subject merchandise entered, or Administration.
currently classifiable under subheadings
withdrawn from warehouse, for [FR Doc. E7–23491 Filed 12–3–07; 8:45 am]
7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015,
7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, and consumption on or after the date of BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S

7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff publication, consistent with section


Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) the cash–deposit
rate for Mukand will be 11.56 percent; DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not listed above, International Trade Administration
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise subject to the order is the cash–deposit rate will continue to be [A–821–802]
dispositive of whether the merchandise the company–specific rate published for
is covered by the order. the most recent period; (3) if the Initialed Draft Amendment to the
exporter is not a firm covered in this Agreement Suspending the
No Changes Since the Preliminary review, a prior review, or the original Antidumping Investigation on Uranium
Results less–than-fair–value investigation but From the Russian Federation; Request
Because the Department received no the manufacturer is, the cash–deposit for Comment
comments on the preliminary results of rate will be the rate established for the AGENCY: Import Administration,
review and it finds no other basis for most recent period for the manufacturer International Trade Administration,
changes in these results, it has made no of the merchandise; and (4) the cash– Department of Commerce.
changes in the final results from the deposit rate for all other manufacturers SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
preliminary results of review. or exporters will continue to be the ‘‘all (‘‘the Department’’) and the Russian
Accordingly, we find that Mukand Ltd. others’’ rate of 48.80 percent, which is Federation’s Federal Atomic Energy
(Mukand) made sales at less than the ‘‘all others’’ rate established in the Agency (‘‘Rosatom’’) have initialed a
normal value in the U.S. market during less–than-fair–value investigation. See draft amendment to the Agreement
the period of review. Final Determination of Sales at Less Suspending the Antidumping
Than Fair Value: Certain Stainless Steel Investigation on Uranium from the
Final Results of the Review Wire Rods from India, 58 FR 54110, Russian Federation (‘‘Suspension
We determine that the weighted– (October 20, 1993). These cash–deposit Agreement’’). The proposed amendment
average dumping margin on Mukand’s rates shall remain in effect until further will allow the Russian Federation
sales of stainless steel wire rods from notice. (‘‘Russia’’) to export Russian uranium
India for the period December 1, 2005,
Notification to Importers products to the U.S. market in
through November 30, 2006, is 11.56
This notice also serves as a final accordance with the export limits and
percent.
reminder to importers of their other terms detailed in the amendment.
Assessment Rates responsibility under 19 CFR The Department is now inviting
The Department will determine, and 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate interested parties to comment on the
U.S. Customs and Border Protection regarding the reimbursement of text of the proposed amendment.
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties antidumping duties prior to liquidation DATES: Comments must be submitted
on all appropriate entries. We intend to of the relevant entries during this within thirty (30) days from the
issue appropriate assessment review period. Failure to comply with publication of this notice.
instructions directly to CBP 15 days this requirement could result in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
after publication of these final results of Secretary’s presumption that Sally C. Gannon at (202) 482–0162,
review. In accordance with 19 CFR reimbursement of antidumping duties Import Administration, International
351.212(b)(1), we have calculated a occurred and the subsequent assessment Trade Administration, U.S. Department
customer/importer–specific, per–unit of double antidumping duties. of Commerce, 14th Street and
amount for entries of subject Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
merchandise during the period of Notification Regarding Administrative DC 20230.
review. Protective Orders
The Department clarified its This notice also serves as a reminder Background
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on to parties subject to an administrative On October 30, 1992, the Department
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and protective order of their responsibility suspended the antidumping duty
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: concerning the disposition of investigation involving uranium from
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 proprietary information disclosed under Russia on the basis of an agreement by
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This such an order in accordance with 19 its government to restrict the volume of
clarification applies to period–of-review CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification direct or indirect exports to the United
entries of subject merchandise produced of the return or destruction of States in order to prevent the
by Mukand where it did not know that administrative–protective-order suppression or undercutting of price
its merchandise was destined for the materials or conversion to judicial levels of U.S. domestic uranium. See
United States. In such instances, we will protective order is hereby requested. Antidumping; Uranium from

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:38 Dec 03, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM 04DEN1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen