Submission available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1ZL9TFpffs&feature=youtu.be
The second project brief for the semester proved to be a challenging but wholly rewarding process for me. Having missed the class in which it was explained, I entered into the assignment in a somewhat flustered state of confusion, exacerbated by a number of factors, namely that I did not know which topic I had been assigned. Admittedly, this would not have been too much of an inconvenience if I had actually read the project brief properly and noticed that, no, we could not pick whichever one we like and that, yes, if you start planning for one that you have not been given you will have to start the process again. I began my planning stage by being as broad as possible. The theme I was assigned was Changes in Communication, a topic I thought to be at once general and specific. I was fortunate enough to overcome a short-lived, preliminary bout of writers block by reverting to a reliable mind map. In the centre I placed the word communication and was able to come up with a number of branching ideas. At the conclusion of this effective, albeit short, exercise, the idea that was jumping out at me the most was the ability of communication methods to not only define the era in which they exist, but to offer bridges across decades and generations. What would happen if I combined the nostalgic click of the typewriter with the modern-times glare of the computer screen? More specifically, what would happen if I combined the versatility of this humble, manual word-processor with the constraints of Twitters 140 character limit? These questions not only offered me with a more concrete path to follow, but opened a number of other avenues down which my mind could wander. Of course, as is customary of the creative process, there were ideas before this final concept which did not make the cut, due primarily to the inability to acquire relevant props or equipment an old, 1990s era computer, for example but also due to time constraints, given that I was several days behind the majority of the cohort. In settling on the idea of blurring the lines between the old and the new at the risk of veering to close to the other project theme of Old vs. New Media I knew that a storyboard would be required if the finished product was to be anywhere the standard I wanted. The shot list I had hastily compiled would serve a purpose, yes, but with such a limited timeframe within which to operate, I knew that each shot if not the most important or difficult ones would have to be carefully pre-planned so as to ensure ease of filming. The development stage of this creative process was thus relatively kink-free. The post-production stage, however, was an absolute nightmare. And I do not use the term lightly. OK, maybe I do. But there were myriad problems which reared their ugly heads during the editing process, though I was able to deal with each of these with consummate efficiency as they did so. My somewhat naive decision to incorporate footage recorded directly from my computer and iPhone screens, respectively, was perhaps the most difficult to navigate. My initial panic after having loaded said footage on to Adobe Premiere and realising that the resolution and size of the footage was completely incongruent with that filmed on the Canon D90 was assuaged with the aid of a handful of YouTube tutorials and calming self-reassurance. I hope you enjoy the finished product!
Rory Dempsey
s3528654
1. A black screen. Superimposed over this, stark white in colour: Nexus.
2. The silhouette of a typewriter at a desk in a darkened room. 3. A candle is lit, illuminating the typewriter. The match is blown out. 4. A piece of paper is gently loaded into a typewriter. 5. A finger hovers gently over the H key. It presses it down. The noise is clear and crisp. 6. We see the Twitter Compose new tweet box. The letter T appears. 7. The next key o is pressed. 8. We see h appear in the text field. 9. The hands continue typing. 10. We cut back to the text box to see the words How in the text box. 11. The hands continue typing. 12. In the text field, we see the words appear as the typewriter noises continue: we communicate says a lot more about us than what we want to say. 13. The typewriter ding sound is heard as we cut to a close up of the share button being clicked. 14. The hands push the typewriter back to the beginning position. 15. The tweet is published and appears in the feed. 16. The hands begin typing again. 17. The words appear in the tweet box: Our modes of communication are more than just ways of relaying information. 18. We see a man in a darkened room using his iPhone. His face is illuminated only by the light from his phone. He types, and the clicking of the keys is crisp and clear. Click. Click, pause. Click, pause. Click, pause. Click, pause. Click, pause. Click. Click, pause. Click. Click, pause. Click, click. Click, click, click. 19. After about 3 clicks, we cut to another man at a desk, lit by a candle, holding a receiver to his ear. He scribbles down the word They and continues listening. 20. The man on the iPhone continues typing, only the clicks of the keys are Morse code letters. As he types, we cut intermittently to the man transcribing his words. We see a shot of what he has written: They are icons of the era in which they existed. Wistful reminders of an erstwhile age. 21. Back to the hands at the type-writer, who types feverishly. 22. The words appear this time in the iMessage text field. A bridge between now and the future. 23. The message appears in the iMessage feed. 24. The man smiles and begins typing on his iPhone. 25. Superimposed over a black screen: Wrote/directed/starred: R Dempsey Shot list/storyboard Releases location release Back-up Media Management: Workflow Legend: Purple: to be filmed Monday with typewriter Green: can be done on computer tonight (13th August) Blue: to be edited last Red: can be filmed tonight