ECONOMIC BASE SECTOR ANALYSIS IN ENCOURAGING ECONOMIC

GROWTH IN KOTA SURABAYA

Prepared to fulfill the Regional Economicss task

Structural assignment that guided by Setyo Tri Wahyudi, SE.,M.Ec.,Ph.D.

Galuh Eka Pramithasari

125020107121009

INTERNATIONAL UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS FACULTY
BRAWIJAYA UNIVERSITY
MALANG
2015

I.

INTRODUCTION

I.1. Background
Every region has several goals to be achieved in running governance every
period. This goals is vary depend on every program that assigned in first period of
governance. Among all goals that assigned, economic goal has become one important
goals that need to be achived. It because economic activity become important role that
cover of many people lives.
Economic goals that need to be achieved by every region may vary. But there
are several goals that we can see in every region or even in a country. There are major
three goals that usually become an important indicator of governments success. Those
goals are stability price, low rate of unemployment, and high rate of economic growth.
When this goals achieved it can be one success indicator for all government.
Among three goals that mentioned before, all goals cannot achieved together or
we can said that those goals are trade-off. Governemnt usually focused on one or two
goals to make economic condition within a region running well. The successful
economic condition in a region can showed by many indicator. The most frequently
indicator used and the most easy calculated indicator is economic growth.
Economic growth can be seen from percentage change in Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) from one period to another period. According Prishardoyo (2008) from
Setiawan (2014), a process speed economic growth in the region show by using the rate
of increase of GDP (Gross Domestic Product), so that the level of GDP per capita
growth in the community is often achieved as a measure of success of a region in
achieving the goal of creating development economy.
Development economy can be achieved by every government in region by
planning their economic activity and distributed it well. Every planning must be
suitable for characteristics and potention in every region. Because all region have
different characteristics and potention so it is an assignment for every government to
make regulation that suitable for their region and can develop every potention that exist.

And the last, from developing every potention it will bring economic development in
every region.
From this explanation, writer use Kota Surabaya as research object with several
consideration. Kota Surabaya as capital city of East Java have big contribution in
economic activity in Java. East Java is second highest contributor of GDP in Java Island
after DKI Jakarta (see appendix 1). This result is unpredictable since Kota Surabaya has
very little precentage of agricultural sector compared with other region. This research
conducted to see which sector that become base sector in Kota Surabaya.
I.2. Formulation of Problem
Based on the description above, there are several problems that can identified
formulation of problem as follows:
I.2.1. Is there any changes in the economic structure of Kota Surabaya in the year
2010-2013?
I.2.2. Which sector that become base sector and non base sector in Kota Surabaya
year 2010-2013?
I.3. Research Purpoes
Based on the formulation of the problem described above, then we got
objectives of this study are as follows:
I.3.1. To examine whether there are change in the economic structure of Kota
Surabaya in the year 2010-2013.
I.3.2. To understanding which sector that become base sector and non base sector
in Kota Surabaya year 2010-2013.

II.

LITERATURE REVIEW

II.1.

Economic Development Theory

Economic development has wide meaning andt the content itself can included

many changes in the economic arrangement in the society as a whole. Development is a

process when there are transformation in several period of time. This transformation
characterized by structural change or in another word a change in core of economic
activity and economic structure in the society in the relevant framework.
Economic development also have another meaning of increasing production
quantitatively that inculding the process of development change in the production
composition. By using allocations change in production resources in economic sectors,
change in the pattern of distribution of wealth and income among the various group of
economic actors, change in institutional framework in a whole society life. One
important thing in development process is the expanding of employment opportunities
that very productive.
II.2.

Regional Economic Development

Regional economics is a branch of economics that in his discussion include

potential differences elements of an area with other regions. Analyze a region (or parts
of) the whole or view the various regions with diverse potential and how to set up a
policy to accelerate the economic growth of a region. With this objectives, we can
analyze and developing every potention that exist in every region and hopefully it can
boost economic development in every region.
Each region needs to develop state of the economy, so it is necessary to develop
economic development. According Adisasmita (2008) regional economic development
is a function of the potential of natural resources, labor and human resources, capital
investment, infrastructure development, transport and communications, industry
composition, technological, economic and trade situation between regions, capabilities
and funding financing of regional development, entrepreneurship, local institutions and
widespread development environment.

According Arsyad (2010), local economic development is a process, the process

includes the establishment of new institutions, the development of alternative industries,
where local governments and communities to manage existing resources and form a
pattern of a partnership between the regions with the private sector. The principal issues
in regional development lies in the emphasis on development policies based on
characteristic (unique value) of the region concerned by the potential use of human
resources, institutional and physical resources locally. There are several theories that
can partially help to understand the importance of local economic development, the
basis of economic theory, neo-classical economic theory, location theory, central place
theory and the theory of gravity
II.3.

Economic Growth Theory

Economic growth can be defined as the process of Increased Production of

Goods and Services in the Public Economy activity. It can be said that the growth
involves the development of a single dimension and measured by increased production
and income. In Economic Growth, usually in the production process which involves a
review of a number of types of products by using a specific means of production
(Djojohadikusomo: 1994).
Adearman (2006), the definition of economic growth is the perspective of a time
period when the economy is said to be experiencing growth in a long time (10, 20 or 50
years, or even longer) experienced an increase in output per capita. Of course during
that time could happen fall in output per capita, due to crop failure for example, but if in
quite a long time the per capita output shows an ascending tendency, it can be said that
economic growth occurs.
Some economists argue that the tendency of the increase in output per capita
alone is not enough, but the increase in output will have to come from the internal
processes of the economy. In other words, the process of economic growth must be selfgenerating, which means that the process of growth itself generates the power for the
onset of continued growth in future periods.

II.4.

Economic Base Theory

Regional economic activity is classified in two sectors of activity, namely the

base activity and non-base activity. Base activity is activity with base-oriented to sell
goods and services outside bounds economys area that is concerned. While the nonbase activities are local oriented activities that provide goods and services to the people
need within the borders of the respective economies.
One way to determine a sector as a sector basis or non-base is by using Location
Quotient (LQ). Arsyad (1999: 315) explains that the technique can divide the Location
Quotient economic activity of a region into two groups. namely:
1. The activities of economic sectors that serve markets in the region itself and outside
the region concerned. Sectors of the economy such as this so-called economic
sectors Potential (Base).
2. The activities of economic sectors that serve the regional market potential is not
called sectors (non-base) or Local Industry.
This theory states that the main determinants of economic growth in the region
is directly related to the demand for goods and services from outside the area. The
growth of industries that use local resources, including labor and raw materials for
export, will generate local wealth and employment creation (job creation) (Arsyad,
1999).

III.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

III.1. Types and Sources of Data

The type of data used in this analysis using secondary data obtained from
Central Bureau of Statistics East Java (BPS Jawa Timur) and Central Bureau of
Statistics Kota Surabaya (BPS Kota Surabaya). Data is taken from Table of Gross
Domestic Product with constant price 2000 classification of 9 sector. Period that used is
the latest period with four year research in 2010-2013.

III.2.

Scope of Research
In accordance with the objectives that want to be achieved in this research,

writer want to analyze the distribution of base and non-base sector in Kota Surabaya. As
a result of this analysis, it is expected to contribute in the regulation making by
Government. It can seen from the contribution of every sector and the effect among
sector itself.

III.3.

Data Collection Method

This research is a desk study where the data used is secondary data such as GDP

and Input-Output Tables. The data is in the form of documents obtained from the
following sources:
1. Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) of Kota Surabaya website
2. Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) East Java website
3. Previous research

III.4.

Data Analysis Technique

III.4.1.Location Quotient (LQ) Analysis

Location Quotient is a technique used to extend the shift share analysis. One
approach used to determine the base sectors are LQ. Industrial activities that
serve the market area itself as well as outside the region concerned. This
industry is called, Indutri Base. Economic activity or industry that caters only to
the region itself is called the Industrial non bases or Local Indutri.
The formula to calculate LQ is as follows:
yi
y
LQ= t
Yi
Yt
Where :
y i=Economic sector income Kota Surabaya
y t =Total income Kota Surabaya
Y i=Economic sector income E ast Java
Y t =Total incomeEast Java

Specification:
a. If the results of LQ> 1 then the sector is considered a sector basis,
meaning that the level of specialization of Kota Surabaya is higher than
the level of East Java. Commodity production is concerned has
exceeded the consumption needs in the areas where the commodity is
produced and the excess can be sold outside the region (exports).
b. If LQ <1 then the sector considered non sector basis, meaning that the
level of specialization in Kota Surabaya is lower than in East Java
province.

III.4.2.Shift-Share Analysis
Shift-Share analysis is a technique to analyze changes in comparison with
the regional structure of the national economy. In this analysis, will be compared
how local growth conditions for national growth. The aim is to view and
determine the performance or productivity of the regional economy with the
wider area or nationally.
General form of the equation shift share analysis and its components are as
follows:
D ij =N ij + M ij +Cij ( 1 )
Where :
i=Economic sector Region( 9 sectors)
j=Regional variable that examined ( Kota Surabaya )
n=Regional variable East Ja va
Dij =Changes isector Kota Surabaya
N ij =National share i sector Kota Surabaya
M ij =Industrial mix i sector Kota Surabaya
Cij =Regional shift i sector Kota Surabaya

In this study the variable region used is GDP is denoted as (E). Equation
(1) above can be searched with this formulation as follows:
D ij =E ' ij Eij (2)
N ij =Eij ( rn ) (3)
M ij =Eij ( rin rn ) (4)
Cij =E ij ( rijrin ) (5)
Where :

Eij =GDP i sectorKota Surabaya 2010

E ' ij =GDP i sector Kota Surabaya 2013
rij=se ctor i growth Kota Surabaya
rin=sector i growthEast Java

rn=averageGDP growthEast Java

The average GDP growth rate in the province of East Java (rn) can be
defined as follows:
'

rij=

E ij E ij
( 6 )
Eij
'

rin=

rn=

E E
( 7 )
E

E ' nEn
(8)
En

Where :
E =GDP i sector East Java2010
E ' =GDP i sector East Ja va2013

En=Total GDP of East Java2010

E ' n=Total GDP of East Java2013
Furthermore, regional economic growth component the proportional
shift (PS) and a differential shift (DS) is used to see changes in the growth of an
activity in the study area to the activity in the reference area. While PS to see a
change in the growth of activities in the area total GDP reference to activities in
the area of reference.
III.4.3.Klassen Tipology
The second component of the value of the PS as the horizontal axis and
vertical axis values as the DS. So as to obtain the four categories, namely:

Differential Shift (DS)

Proportional Shift (PS)

Negative (-)

Positive (+)

Kuadrant IV

Kuadrant I

(Potential)

(Rapid Growth)

Kuadrant III

Kuadrant II

(Depressed)

(Develop)

Positive (+)

Negative (-)
Source : Wibowo (2004)
Specification:
a) Quadrant I (PS positive and positive DS) is a region / sector with
very rapid growth.
b) Quadrant II (PS positive and negative DS) is a region / sector at a
speed of stunted growth but tend potential.
c) Quadrant III (PS negative and negative DS) is a region / sector
with weak competitiveness, and also the role of the lower region.
d) Quadrant IV (PS negative and positive DS) is a region / sector
with the speed but growing stunted growth.

IV.

IV.1.

RESULT AND DICUSSION

Location Quotient (LQ) Analysis Result

Location Quotient (LQ) have function to examine which economic sector that

become base sector and non-base sector which can determine the role of sector in
economy activity within a area. The result of Kota Sutrabayas LQ analysis can
showned below :
Table 1 : Location Quotient (LQ) Result of Kota Surabaya year 2010 - 2013
No

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Sector/Industry

Agriculture
Mining and Excavation
Processing Industry
Electricity, Gases and Water
Construction
Trade, Hotel and Restaurant
Transportation and
Communication
Finance, Leasing and
Corporate Services
Services
Total

Year

Average
LQ

2010
0,01
0,00
0,86
1,72
2,10
1,36
1,57

2011
0,01
0,00
0,85
1,65
2,05
1,34
1,55

2012
0,01
0,00
0,85
1,62
2,05
1,33
1,52

2013
0,01
0,00
0,83
1,59
2,03
1,32
1,50

0,01
0,00
0,85
1,65
2,05
1,34
1,53

1,20

1,18

1,18

1,17

1,18

0,98
9,80

0,98
9,60

0,97
9,52

0,96
9,40

0,97
9,58

Source : Secondary Data Analysis, 2015.

As you can see in table 1 above, Kota Surabaya has 5 leading sector that become
base sector. This mean that this five sector can fullfil the local needs and even expirt to
another region. Those sector are electricity, gases and water sector, construction sector,
trade, hotel and restaurant sector, transportation and communication sector, and the last
one is finance, leasing and corporate services sector.
In 2010, the sector that become base sector in Kota Surabaya are electricity,
gases and water sector, construction sector, trade, hotel and restaurant sector,
transportation and communication sector, and the last one is finance, leasing and
corporate services sector. This five sector has the LQ value above 1. And as you can see
there are sector that have to become potential sector in next period. That sector is
services sector which have value 0,98.
In next period or in year 2011, sector that become leading sector in Kota
Surabaya is same as previous period. But among all those base sector there are
decreasing value in LQ result. As we can see that every sector has decreased for almost
0,02-0,07. This is mean that every sector still can fullfil local need but to fullfil another
area needs (or export) is decreasing. But for services sector that have potential to
become base sector is still stagnant.
Year 2012 base sector in Kota Surabaya is still the same. But there are several
sector that in same result and there are some of them that decreasing. Sector that still in
same value is construction sector and finance, leasing and corporate services sector.
Beside this sector or another 3 base sector has decreased 0,01. But for services sector
that have potential to become base sector has decreased 0,01 become 0,97. If this pace
is still same for next period this mean that services sector has no potential to become
base sector.
In last period of research or in 2013 the base sector is still same. But the value of
LQ has decreasing again. Although the decreasing is not as many as 2011, 0,01-0,03,
but this result is disappointing since we will enter Asean Economic Community in
2015. Services sector also have decreased by 0,01. Although the average of the result is
good but if this result is decreasing continously, Kota Surabayas government should
make several regulation that can improve the LQ result.

In average the result of LQ is good in several sector. Kota Surabaya is still

considering an leading region among city in East Java. It showed by the result of base
sector in this area is quite good. Even there are sector that has no contribution at all.
Those sector are mining and excavation sector. But this result is understandable since
Kota surabaya has no area that become mining area. Kota Surabaya is fulled by housing
business. It shown by the LQ result of construction sector that have an average 2,05.
IV.2.

Shift-Share Analysis Result

The objectives to be achieved in this study by using shift share analysis, the first

to determine the effect of economic growth in East Java on economic growth in Kota
Surabaya (national growth effect or national share). The second to determine the
relative changes in the performance of the sectors in the city of Surabaya on the same
sectors in East Java (proportional shift or industrial mix). The third is to find a
competitive advantage sectors in Kota Surabaya against the same sectors in East Java
(differential shift or regional shift).
The first analysis is national share. This analysis have main aim to examine the
effect of economic growth in East Java to economic condition in Kota Surabaya. The
result of national share in Kota Surabaya is shown below :
Table 2 : Table 2 : Effect of Economic Growth in East Java on Economy of Kota
Surabaya years 2010-2013 (millions Rupiah)

No

Sector/Industry

1
2
3

Agriculture
Mining and Excavation
Processing Industry

Electricity, Gases and Water

Construction

Trade, Hotel and Restaurant

Transportation and
Communication

GDP Kota
Surabaya
2010
(Eij)
79.171,88
6.353,21
19.225.158
,74
2.054.130,
71
5.916.295,
16
37.025.575
,65
10.082.259
,62

East Java
Average
GDP
Growth
(rn)
22,54
22,54
22,54
22,54
22,54
22,54
22,54

National
Share (Ns)
(Nij)
1.784.478,58
143.196,89
433.321.577,
48
46.298.663,7
3
133.349.138,
30
834.530.474,
61
227.247.051,
75

8
9

Finance, Leasing and

Corporate Services
Services

5.745.701,
96
7.694.194,
84
87.828.841
,77

Total

22,54

129.504.087,
36
173.421.748,
58
1.979.600.41
7,28

22,54
22,54

Sources : Secondary Data Analysis, 2015.

According to the result in table 2, it is shown that Trade, hotel and restaurant
sector has the largest result or 834.530.474,61 million Rupiah. This is mean that trade,
hotel and restaurant sector become sector with largest proportion that affected by
economic growth in East Java. The result is following by processing industry sector and
transportation and communication sector. This result is commonly found since Kota
Surabaya have large contribution in economic activity in this three sector.
If the result of national share this is mean that economic growth in East Java has
effect to economic activity in Kota Surabaya. And if the result is negative this is mean
that economic growth in East Java has no effect on economic condition in Kota
Surabaya. From the result above although there are sector that has small result, it has no
negative result. As you can see the smallest one is in mining sector with number
143.196,89 million Rupiah then following with agricultural sector with number
1.784.478,58 million Rupiah. Although the result is particulary small compared with
other sector, this result is common since Kota Surabaya has small area of mining and
agriculture.
As for seeing the change relative performance of sectors that exist in Kota
Surabaya against the same sectors in East Java can be seen in Table 3 below :
Table 3 : Proportional Shift Value Sectors in Kota Surabaya years 2010-2013
(millions Rupiah)

No

Sector/Industry

GDP Kota
Surabaya
2010
(Eij)

Agriculture

79.171,88

i sector
Growth in
East Java

Averag
e GDP
growth
in East
Java

(rin)

(rn)

7,79

22,54

Industrial
Mix
Mij = Eij (rinrn)
1.167.424,97

2
3

4
5
6
7

Mining and
Excavation
Processing
Industry
Electricity, Gases
and Water
Construction
Trade, Hotel and
Restaurant
Transportation
and
Communication
Finance, Leasing
and Corporate
Services
Services

Total

6.353,21

12,12

22,54

-66.186,11

19.225.158
,74

19,10

22,54

2.054.130,
71
5.916.295,
16
37.025.575
,65
10.082.259
,62

18,19

22,54

27,41

22,54

31,26

22,54

34,94

22,54

66.156.337,7
1
8.933.026,05
28.835.308,3
5
322.713.833,
43
125.011.602,
98

5.745.701,
96

25,70

22,54

18.187.023,4
7

7.694.194,
84

16,27

22,54

87.828.841
,77

22,54

22,54

48.265.947,9
9
370.158.845,
40

Sources : Secondary Data Analysis, 2015.

Based on Table 3 shows that the sectors of trade, hotel and restaurant has a mix
of the most large industrial value is 322,713,833.43 million dollars. This means the
trade, hotels and restaurants leading to the economy grew relatively fast compared to
the same sector in East Java. So that the effect of the mix of industrial / sectoral against
trade, hotels and restaurants Kota Surabaya has a positive value. Then the result is
followed by transportation and communication sector that have a result 125.011.602,98
Overall it can be concluded that the rapid economic growth in trade, hotels and
restaurants and transportation & communication in East Java positive effect on the same
sector in Kota Surabaya.
As for the view of competitiveness or competitive advantages of the sectors in
Kota Surabaya on the same sectors in East Java can be seen in Table 4 below :
Table 4: Values of Sectors Competitiveness in Kota Surabaya, 2010-2013 (millions
Rupiah)
No

Sector/Industry

GDP Kota

i Sector

i Sector

Differentia

1
2
3

Agriculture
Mining and
Excavation
Processing
Industry

Surabaya
2010

Growth in
Kota
Surabaya

Growth in
East Java

(Eij)

(rij)

(rin)

79.171,88
6.353,21

-0,22
11,65

7,79
12,12

19.225.158
,74

16,47

19,10

Electricity, Gases
and Water

2.054.130,
71

10,72

18,19

Construction

5.916.295,
16

25,08

27,41

Trade, Hotel and

Restaurant

37.025.575
,65

29,01

31,26

Transportation
and
Communication
Finance, Leasing
and Corporate
Services
Services

10.082.259
,62

30,53

34,94

5.745.701,
96

23,73

25,70

7.694.194,
84

15,74

16,27

Total

87.828.841
,77

24,21

22,54

l Shift (DS)
Cij = Eij (rij rin)
-634.113,61
-2.966,78
50.590.801,
77
15.350.138,
68
13.803.951,
65
83.197.639,
04
44.438.430,
74
11.332.878,
83
4.062.329,5
9
223.413.25
0,68

Sources : Secondary Data Analysis, 2015

According to table 4 we can see that there are no sector that have competitive
advantage in Kota Surabaya. This can seen from the result of Regional Shift above. All
sector has negative value which mean that the development of those sector is not
significant. This result is quite surprising since Kota Surabaya has a good result in
national share and industrial mix.
From this result we can conclude that all the sector has no competitive
advantage at all. If we can see further this result may caused by the ability of Kota
Surabaya in producing product that have competitive advantage compared with other

region is still low. This is also mean that most of product that used in economic activity
in Kota Surabaya not produced by Kota Surabaya itself but come from another area.
IV.3.

Klassen Tipology Result

The second component of the value of the PS as the horizontal axis and vertical

axis values as the DS. So as to obtain the four categories, namely:

Table 5: Position Relative Sector Based PS And DS Approach

Differential Shift (DS)

Positive (+)

Negative (-)

Proportional Shift (PS)

Negative (-)
Kuadrant IV (Potential)

Positive (+)
Kuadrant
I
(Rapid
Growth)
Kuadrant III(Depressed) :
Kuadrant II (Develop):
1. Mining sector
1. Trade, Hotel and
2. Agricultural Sector
Restaurant Sector
3. Electricity, Gases and 2. Transportation
and
Water sector
Communication
4. Services Sector
3. Construction Sector
5. Processing
Industry 4. Finance, Leasing and
Sector
Corporate
Services
Sector

Sources : Secondary Data Analysis, 2015

Based on the result in Table 5 there are no sector that considered in Kuadrant I
or have rapid growth. This result is have same result with LQ result before. Even in LQ
the result are have many sector that become base sector, but the result are decreasing.
From comparing the result in PS and DS we find that there are four sector that included
in Kuadrant II or developed sector. Those sector are :
1.
2.
3.
4.

Trade, Hotel and Restaurant Sector

Transportation and Communication
Construction Sector
Finance, Leasing and Corporate Services Sector
And there are five sector that considered as depressed sector or in Kuadran III,

those sector are :

1. Mining sector
2. Agricultural Sector

3. Electricity, Gases and Water sector

4. Services Sector
5. Processing Industry Sector

V.

CONCLUSION

From the result of research that already done, we can conclude several
conclusion and recommendation for Kota Surabaya Government in developing
economic activity in this area, those are :

1. According to Location Quotient (LQ) result, the base sector in Kota Surabaya is
five sector. This mean that this five sector can fullfil the local needs and even
expirt to another region. Those sector are electricity, gases and water sector,
construction sector, trade, hotel and restaurant sector, transportation and
communication sector, and the last one is finance, leasing and corporate services
sector.
2. From national share that have aim to examine the effect of economic growth in
East Java to economic condition in Kota Surabaya. It is founded that trade, hotel
and restaurant sector become sector with largest proportion that affected by
economic growth in East Java. The result is following by processing industry
sector and transportation and communication sector.
3. For proportional share (PS) we can find that the rapid economic growth in trade,
hotels and restaurants and transportation & communication in East Java positive
effect on the same sector in Kota Surabaya.
4. From the result of Differential Shift (DS) we can conclude that all the sector has
no competitive advantage at all. If we can see further this result may caused by
the ability of Kota Surabaya in producing product that have competitive
advantage compared with other region is still low. This is also mean that most of
product that used in economic activity in Kota Surabaya not produced by Kota
Surabaya itself but come from another area.
5. Based on the result in comparing PS and DS, there are no sector that considered
in Kuadrant I or have rapid growth. This result is have same result with LQ
result before. Even in LQ the result are have many sector that become base
sector, but the result are decreasing.
6. Comparison of PS and DS have result in Kuadrant II or developed sector. Those
sector

are

Trade,

Hotel

and

Restaurant

Sector, Transportation

and

Communication, Construction Sector, Finance, Leasing and Corporate Services

Sector
7. And there are five sector that considered as depressed sector or in Kuadran III,
those sector are Mining sector, Agricultural Sector, Electricity, Gases and Water
sector, Services Sector, Processing Industry Sector
From this result writer have suggestion to Kota Surabaya Government.
Determination of development policy and development of regional economic
sectors should be prioritized in sectors that could potentially be a base sector and
have a major effect on GDP contribution Kota Surabaya. If this base sector

developed more it can have good potential to become main contributor not only in
Kota Surabaya but also in East Java and Indonesia.

APPENDIX

Appendix 1 : Chart 1.2. Percentage of GDP in Javas Province in 2013

7%
29%
25%

DKI Jakarta
West Java
Central Java
DI Yogyakarta

2%
14%

Source : BPS, processed

East Java
24%

Banten

Appendix 2 : Table GDP Constant Price East Java 2010-2013

N
o

Sector/Industry

1 Agriculture
Mining and
2 Excavation
3 Processing Industry
Electricity, Gases and
4 Water
5 Construction
Trade, Hotel and
6 Restaurant
Transportation and
7 Communication
Finance, Leasing and
8 Corporate Services
9 Services
Total

2010
51.329.548,
83
7.757.319,8
2
86.900.779,
13
4.642.081,8
1
10.992.599,
76
106.229.11
2,97
25.076.424,
92
18.659.490,
17
30.693.407,
48
342.280.76
4,89

Year
2011
2012
52.628.433, 54.463.942,
15
77
8.228.632,4 8.419.507,7
8
6
92.171.191, 98.017.056,
46
47
4.932.084,3 5.238.431,6
6
9
11.994.825, 12.840.565,
72
41
116.645.21 128.375.49
4,35
8,60
27.945.256, 30.640.913,
13
33
20.186.109, 21.782.339,
19
97
32.251.530, 33.884.591,
62
41
366.983.27 393.662.84
7,46
7,40

2013
55.330.095,
90
8.697.627,5
6
103.497.23
2,68
5.486.499,1
0
14.006.020,
59
139.431.30
7,45
33.837.742,
37
23.455.842,
04
35.686.078,
02
419.428.44
5,69

Appendix 3 : Table GDP Constant Price 2000 Kota Surabaya 2010-2013

No

Sector/Industry

2010
79.171,88

Year
2011
2012
77.663,11
78.013,26

6.353,21
19.225.15
8,74

6.511,23
20.223.27
8,64

6.743,23
21.421.547,
93

7.093,65
22.390.903,
12

2.054.130,
71
5.916.295,
16

2.089.362,
01
6.316.849,
86

2.188.177,3
8
6.782.238,2
1

2.274.285,7
0
7.400.100,1
1

2013
79.001,28

Agriculture

Mining and
Excavation

Processing Industry

Electricity, Gases
and Water

Construction

Trade, Hotel and

Restaurant

37.025.57
5,65

40.371.15
0,00

44.011.461,
26

47.766.042,
34

Transportation and
Communication

10.082.25
9,62

11.122.64
7,38

12.054.700,
61

13.160.461,
86

Finance, Leasing
and Corporate
Services

Services
Total

5.745.701,
96
7.694.194,
84
87.828.84
1,77

6.153.536,
23
8.110.024,
29
94.471.02
2,75

6.613.389,3
3
8.515.422,3
6
101.671.69
3,57

7.109.284,2
8
8.905.129,5
5
109.092.30
1,89

REFERENCES

Adisasmita, Rahardo. 2008. Pengembangan Wilayah Konsep dan Teori. Jakarta : Graha
Ilmu.
Arsyad, Lincolin. 1999. Pengantar Perencanaan dan PemConstruction Ekonomi Daerah.
Yogyakarta. BPFE.

Arsyad, Lincolin. 2010. Ekonomi PemConstruction. Edisi Kelima. UPP STIE YKPN,
Yogyakarta.
Badan Pusat Statistik Jawa Timur. 2015. Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Atas Dasar
Harga

Konstan

2000,

2009

2013.

(Online

http://jatim.bps.go.id/linkTabelStatis/view/id/131 accessed 8 June 2015).

Jawa Timur : BPS.
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Surabaya. 2015. Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Kota
Surabaya

Menurut

Lapangan

Usaha

2009-2013.

(Online

http://surabayakota.bps.go.id/website/flipping_publikasi/Produk-DomestikRegionla-Bruto-Kota-Surabaya-Menurut-Lapangan-Usaha-2009--2013/indexFlip.php accessed 8 June 2015). Kota Surabaya : BPS.

Djojohadikusumo, Sumitro. 1994. Dasar Teori Ekonomi Pertumbuhan dan Ekonomi
PemConstruction. Cetakan ke satu. Jakarta. LP3ES.
Mareta, Setia Nilga. 2013. Analisis Perubahan Struktur Ekonomi dan Penentuan Sektor
Unggulan Kota Surabaya Year 2007-2011. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas
Surabaya.
Prishardoyo, Bambang. 2008. Analisis Tingkat Perumbuhan Ekonomi dan Potensi
Ekonomi Terhadap Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Kabupaten Pati Year
2000-2005. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan, Vol.1, (No.1) :1-8.
Setiawan, Muhammad. 2014. Analisis Sektor Ekonomi Basis dalam Mendorong
Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Kota Batu. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas
Brawijaya.