Right usage of "P.S.

" in Emails - Writers Stack Exchange

1 of 3

http://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/3042/right-usage-of-p-s-in-e...

Writers
Questions

Tags

Users

Badges

Unanswered

Ask

Right usage of "P.S." in Emails

5

email

I've been wondering this for a while. What is the correct usage of "P.S." in e-mails? Where should and shouldn't it
be used?
improve this question
asked Jun 6 '11 at 20:31
tugberk
128114

Uhm, maybe I'm wrong, but to me this question looks more related to "how to write an e-mail" rather than something strictly related
to English... Alenanno Jun 6 '11 at 20:38

@Alenanno Uhm, most probably you might be wrong. Because there is no such a thing like P.S. in Turkish. At least, not that I know
of. tugberk Jun 6 '11 at 20:40
1

What about French, Spanish, Italian, German? If I copied and pasted this question in any of those SE sites (pretending some of
them already exist), the question would "fit"... Unless you're asking for something specifically about English usage of P.S., then I'd be
wrong. Alenanno Jun 6 '11 at 20:43

I don't get the votes to close. P.S. is a linguistic element, and email is a linguistic medium. The proper usage is a reasonable thing to
ask about, even if it's not easy to arrive at a concensus. FumbleFingers Jun 6 '11 at 22:48
@FumbleFingers: I'll tell you my point of view: I didn't exactly voted to close, I voted to migrate the questions to the Writers SE. I
think it is far more related to the question than this SE does, in my opinion. This is a question about style, not about English.
Alenanno Jun 7 '11 at 0:04
show 6 more comments

migrated from english.stackexchange.com Jun 7 '11 at 9:16

order by

4 Answers
13

P.S. in e-mails is used exactly the same as P.S. in normal letters. It is short for the Latin post scriptum, i.e.
written after the main script. As such, it is written at the bottom (end) of the main script (main e-mail in this
case), and generally contains information which is trivial, or tangental to what was just said. For example,
I'm starting my new job on Monday. Really looking forward to it. I'm going to be working as a clothes designer.
P.S. Do you still like making clothes?

improve this answer

answered Jun 6 '11 at 20:45
Jez

I know it's only an example, but if I got an email from someone I didn't know well enough to already know what their new job
was going to be, that particular P.S. wouldn't seem trivial or tangential to me. I'd assume [s]he was sounding me out to work
on making up the clothes [s]he was going to be designing! :-) FumbleFingers Jun 6 '11 at 21:29

7/30/2013 4:04 dharanidhar

Right usage of "P.S." in Emails - Writers Stack Exchange

2 of 3

http://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/3042/right-usage-of-p-s-in-e...

To be exact, Post Scriptum means "after what has been written"... By the way, Post Scriptum can also contain important

Personally
I think P.S. is never really 'appropriate' in emails.
information, the real feature is that you wrote it after you finished the letter, because you forgot to write it in the main body...
And here I kind of agree with @FumbleFingers, in "formal" e-mails, it might sound weird... Maybe if they are informal, it can
The whole
point of a post-scriptum is it's something you think of after the main text has already been
be ignored. Alenanno Jun 7 '11 at 0:30
written. By which time in the old days of pen-and-ink you'd have already written your closing lines, and most
likely signed it as well.

With electronic writing such as emails, just go back and add the extra text in the main body. Don't insult
your reader by subjecting him to badly-organised text just because you can't be bothered to organise it
before you click on Send.
improve this answer
answered Jun 6 '11 at 20:44
FumbleFingers
46627

So should books (written on computers, typewriter or with pen) never have footnotes, or does it mean the author was too
lazy to go back and edit the main body? I know PS and footnotes are not quite the same thing, but I think they could be used
in similar ways. Hugo Jun 6 '11 at 22:16
@Hugo: Footnotes are quite common in the kind of 'pop science' books I often read, but to be honest I don't really like them
that much. I'm never sure when to break off from the main thread, so sometimes I never actually read them at all. Similar to
the disjointed style in New Scientist (Time may be more familiar if you're US), but at least in those the 'supplementary'
text/diagrams are big enough to draw you in when you reach the end of a paragraph in the main article. FumbleFingers Jun
6 '11 at 22:33

I think it is certainly appropriate as a stylistic element in emails as well. Although the technical necessity of a post scriptum
addition may be obsolete, placing something in a "P.S." emphasizes its being an afterthought, which is an expression in
itself. WAF Jun 7 '11 at 0:34
@WAF: All sounds like pretty subtle nuancing for an email. We're not talking carefully-crafted prose here. FumbleFingers
Jun 7 '11 at 1:50

As FumbleFingers already noted, the post scriptum should appear after the main body of the text, perhaps
even after the signature. With that said, I do agree with FumbleFingers that the construct likely has no place
in E-mail.
I would like to additionally point out that there is another use for P.S. besides adding a new thought to the
correspondence: I have often seen P.S. used in E-mails to incite a new thread of conversation that is
tangent to the main topic. While I think that might be a legitimate use in other forms of correspondence, it is
generally considered bad netiquette when used in E-mail. Although the rule was not written in the original
RFC, it is generally considered bad form to change the topic of an E-mail thread; topics should be changed
by sending a separate E-mail, thus starting a new thread.
With that said, in rare cases I think the P.S. construct might be acceptable if used like a footnote, i.e., to
provide some additional clarification on something from the main body of text that is likely unnecessary, and
would otherwise hamper the flow of the main text.
improve this answer
answered Jun 6 '11 at 21:07
ESultanik
1212

Well I did specifically say never really 'appropriate' rather than just never appropriate, and I think you've identified some aspects of
'excusable' exceptions. I don't do work emails much these days, but I always preferred a second email to receiving one email with an
unrelated addendum. I really do think it's often just lack of consideration for people who might want/need to deal with things in an
orderly and efficient manner. FumbleFingers Jun 6 '11 at 21:21

7/30/2013 4:04 dharanidhar

Right usage of "P.S." in Emails - Writers Stack Exchange

3 of 3

-3

http://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/3042/right-usage-of-p-s-in-e...

I do use it in emails if the email itself is a formal business message, but the recipient is also a friend outside work. This makes it easy
PS
stands for "Please see" in the e-mails, to highlight something important. There is no need of Post script
for them to forward on work related content while stripping out personal stuff, eg. Attached are those reports your Director asked for,
in
the
e-mails.
Post
is up
outdated
was used
in at
earlier
yada yada,
regards,
Rory.script
p.s. You
for a beertechnique
after work? which
Rory Alsop
Jun 6 '11
22:58 days when there were no e-mails.
@Rory Alsop: Haha glad I didn't work with you then. Maybe I'm anal, but I'd rather have the bit about the beer on a separate email.
Thanks
Or a call would have been better. Besides, what if I wanted to forward the work stuff to others? No thanks. FumbleFingers Jun 7 '11
atimprove
1:53 this answer
answered Apr 23 '12 at 8:43
Abhishek Kumar Singh
1

I don't think "please see" is the "P.S." that the original poster intended - particularly as OP accepted a "post scriptum" answer.
Standback Apr 23 '12 at 8:58

Your Answer

log in or

Name:

Email:

Home Page:

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

meta chat about help blog privacy policy legal contact us full site
2013 stack exchange, inc

7/30/2013 4:04 dharanidhar