Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Subscribe
About Us
Magazine Issues
Newsletters
Adv ertise
REGISTER
NEC
Design
Contractor
Safety
Power Quality
T raining
Shop
LOG IN
Basics
Products
Tw eet
COMMENTS 0
Case study reveals answers to switching transient problem on plants power factor correction capacitor
banks
Photo Galleries
Test Your Electrical
Symbols IQ
Are you ready? Its time
for another challenge on
the symbols front. If you
think youre an electrical symbols master, then now is
your chance to prove it.
Comments
New Topics
indefinitely. The team needed to conduct additional analysis that was broad in scope,
including taking a more in-depth look at transients modeling, fuse testing, bus bar finiteelement modeling, harmonics measurements, and simulation.
Voltage VFDs
On-site assessment
affect it....
More
Additional on-site testing showed that high-frequency transients were initiated each time
the capacitors switched (Fig. 1). The transients were large enough to cause false turn-on
and possible failure of the induction furnace silicon-controlled rectifiers (SCRs). The
transients did not indicate problems with the vacuum switches; the problems were caused
by the particular configuration of the electrical distribution system. At the end of the onsite testing, the engineering team formed a theory about the failures:
EC&M Webinars
JUL 2 1 , 2 0 1 5
Capacitor switching transients caused false turn-on of induction furnace SCRs and a short
circuit through the converters DC bus.
SPONSORED
ON DEMAND:
Mitigation Methods for
Arc Flash Hazards Enhancing Personal
Safety
Transient voltages were sufficient to jump the air gap between the bus bars and cabinet.
JUL 1 4 , 2 0 1 5
Deficiencies in fuse coordination allowed the resulting short circuit to burn until the bus
bars separated.
However, additional engineering analysis, fuse testing, and computer modeling were
required to test each phase of the theory.
Fuse testing at high-power laboratory
Fuses from the metal casting plant were obtained to test their response to high-current
short circuits. The fuses were tested at 39,525 peak amperes at the high-power test lab.
The results clearly eliminated the fast-acting fuses as the cause of the bus failures. Voltage
developed across the fuses was limited to only about 1,500V (click here to see Fig. 2),
much less than the 20,000V required to jump the air gap between bus bars and the
furnace cabinet. This led the engineering team to abandon the initial current chop theory.
SPONSORED
ON DEMAND:
Understanding the
2015 Edition of NFPA
70E and the Arc Flash
Hazard
VIEW MORE WEBINARS
E C&M TV
New Certification
Announcement from
NFPA
...
At this point, the engineering team suspected that the plants electrical system was
amplifying transients due to its unusual response characteristics. The only way to
investigate this theory, short of turning capacitors on and off with the induction furnaces
energized and at risk of failure, was to model the power systems response to highfrequency events. The model included both the plants 12kV capacitors and the electric
utilitys four separate 34kV capacitors, assessing the effects of all the possible
combinations of the seven banks.
More
Modeling showed that capacitor switching transients were severe enough to cause false
turn-on, or even failure, of the furnace SCRs. Further analysis showed that the transients
could be reduced by converting the capacitors to harmonic filters with the addition of line
reactors. In fact, the capacitors had originally been selected to accommodate line reactors
in a harmonic filter arrangement.
Measurements of power system harmonics
The location of the bus bar failures indicated that current had either jumped the air gap
between the bus bars and cabinet, the bus bar structure had moved during the fault and
touched the cabinet, or the bus bars from different phases had touched during the event.
Fuse testing eliminated the first theory. The bus bars were then modeled to determine if
they moved or touched.
Fault currents flowing through bus bars or wires create large mechanical forces that act
to repel conductors on different phases. The analysis work first required that a finiteelement computer model of the bus bars be created. This model was then analyzed to
determine the amount of mechanical force generated during various kinds of faults. Once
the mechanical forces were determined, the amount of deflection, or movement, of the
bus bars could be predicted.
Figure 3 (click here to see Fig. 3) shows the results of the modeling. Clearly, mechanical
forces generated by the short circuit current were sufficient to cause bus bars to touch.
Once the bus bars touched, the fault current flowed until bus bars burned in two.
Lessons learned
The final results of the engineering teams extensive analysis revealed a simple cause of
the failures: Bus bars were inadequately braced to withstand the forces generated during
a short circuit (click here to see Fig. 4). The short circuits resulted from unintended SCR
conduction due to capacitor switching transients, but the short circuits would have
caused little damage if the bus bars had been adequately braced.
Our power system engineers inspected the induction furnace repairs and found that the
furnace manufacturer had installed additional bus bracing after the first failures,
indicating that perhaps the vendor suspected the real problem from the beginning.
In addition to the bus bracing, it was recommended that the bus bars be equipped with
transient voltage surge suppression devices. These devices limit the magnitude of voltage
transients and provide additional protection.
Finally, the power factor correction capacitors are being converted to harmonic filters.
This conversion helps to limit the magnitude of voltage transients, and removes some of
the harmonic currents produced by the furnaces.
The benefits realized from this engineering analysis were significant. First, the cause of
catastrophic failures that had cost $750,000 in repair and restart for the facility were
identified and eliminated. The just-in-time status was preserved, saving millions in
potential lost sales. Not only was the electric utility exonerated, but the plant and utility
gained a better understanding of the intricacies of their shared power system
characteristics.
Ray is the director of Schneider Engineering Services based in Raleigh, N.C. He can be
reached at Larry.ray@schneider-electric.com.
Connect With Us
SIDEBAR: The Heat Is On
The furnaces at this plant melt scrap iron, attaining a temperature of 2,600F. They operate by
inducing currents in the scrap by rapidly varying the magnetic field around the metal. The
highly fluctuating field is produced from a constant frequency AC source through use of large
electronic power converters. These converters change 60-Hz AC voltage and current to DC and
then to 200-Hz AC through silicon-controlled rectifiers (SCRs).
The induction furnaces were served by twin 12kV to 575V transformers. The furnaces
each had an electrical capacity of 8MW. AC power was delivered from transformers to
the SCRs through large copper bus bars, which experienced the catastrophic failures
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedRSS
Tw eet
SHARE
Re late d Article s
Using Transient Simulation Tools in PQ Investigations
Understanding Transients: A Primer
Tracking Down Transient Voltages
Protecting Communication Networks From Overvoltages
PQ Tip: PWM Drives May Have Bearing on Bearing Failures
Ecmwe b .co m
NEC
Design
Contractor
Safety
Site Fe ature s
EC &M C o rp o rate
Author Guidelines
RSS
Sitem ap
About Us
Site Archiv e
Adv ertise
Subscribe
Contact Us
Fo llo w Us
Power Quality
T raining
Products
Basics