Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Properties Correlations
Ahmed Alzahabi,
Texas Tech University
Ahmed El-Banbi and Mohamed H. Sayyouh,
Cairo University
Copyright 2013, Southwestern Petroleum Short Course
This paper was prepared for presentation at the 60th Annual Southwestern Petroleum Short Course, April 17-18, 2013.
1. ABSTRACT
The accuracy of determination of the crude oil PVT properties is essential for solving many reservoir engineering,
production engineering, reserve accurate estimates and surface production and operational problems. A large number of PVT
correlations for oil exist in the petroleum literature and numerous studies are also present for with data favoring one
correlation over the other. In the absence of PVT representative data from laboratory experiments, it is often difficult to
choose which correlation to use to calculate different PVT properties. We approached this problem in two ways. First, we
developed an expert system that checks the input parameters (e.g. reservoir parameters) against the valid ranges of input data
for different correlations as cited by the author of each correlation, and then recommends which correlations to use for
specific input parameters. Second, we tested all available PVT correlations for black oil on a database of selected 3500 data
points of crudes to develop criteria on which correlations to use for each PVT property for any specific range of input data.
These specific crudes were selected to allow testing of those guidelines on a wide range of reservoir input data for black oils.
Our database included oils with oAPI ranging from 17 to 51, gas-oil-ratios of 8 to 7,800 scf/STB, formation volume factor at
bubble point of 1.04 to 4.47 bbl/STB, bubble point pressures of 60 to 4,739 psia, and reservoir temperatures of 40 to 270 F.
The present work included 14 bubble points, 6 solution-gas-oil ratio, 14 formation volume factors, 13 oil compressibilities,
14 dead oil viscosities, 9 saturated oil viscosities, 10 under saturated oil viscosities ,12 under-saturated densities, 2 total
formation volume factors and 2 saturated oil density correlations.
An amazing match was concluded due to combining both the developed PVT-Calculator and PVT-Expert System, which
made the conclusion more applicable to be tested to different PVT data points in all future applications.
Based on this study, guidelines for selecting an appropriate correlation for PVT oil properties and specific guiding ranges are
introduced for black oil PVT properties correlations .These guidelines are recommended in programming of PVT correlations
regardless of their geographic origin.
2. INTRODUCTION
Usually, PVT properties are experimentally measured in the laboratory. When such direct measurements are not
available, PVT correlations from the literature are often used.
Fundamentally, there are two different types of correlations in literature. The first group of correlations is developed using
randomly selected datasets. Such correlations are called generic correlations. The second group of correlations is developed
using a certain geographical area or a certain types of oil. Correlations using randomly selected datasets may not be suitable
for certain type of oils, or certain geographical areas. Even though the authors of the generic correlations want to cover a
wide range of data .Such correlations still work better for certain types of oils.
Specialized correlations represent the properties of a certain type of oil or geographical area (for which they are developed)
better than the general purpose correlations.
The best source of oil property data is the laboratory PVT (pressure-volume-temperature) analysis of a reservoir fluid sample.
However, in the absence of experimentally measured properties of reservoir fluids, these physical properties must be
estimated from correlations.
Many correlations for estimating crude oil PVT properties have been published in the past 50 years. Most of these
correlations yield reasonably accurate results when applied at the original limitations.
Here our work presents the details of the error statistics for each correlation. For comparison, error analyses were carried out
for this study and for some of the more frequently used published correlations in the industry.
We believe that the results obtained by using these correlations will improve the use of material balance calculations as well
as the recovery efficiency of a reservoir.
A computer program for oil PVT correlations model was written in a programming language to predict all the properties over
a wide range of input data and also to provide the most appropriate correlation to be used for any reservoir data range based
on the limitations of each correlation which has been mentioned in the literature with all database of limitations as briefly
explained in the following tables.
3. LITERATURE REVIEW
In order to get reliable results of this work a special care is given to the limitations of the input parameters of each
correlation as mentioned in literature for the empirical correlations of PVT correlations that are related to Oil Properties.
In this work we present the most popular black oil correlations developed during the period from 1947 to 2010. The
paper provides the essential background required for the comparison and listed all ranges of the inputs according to the
original condition of each correlation as published in the original paper.
There have been a number of empirical correlations developed for medium and light crude oils. However, their applicability
is limited to specific oils due to the complex formulation of the crude oils. Moreover, their applicability to heavy oils is very
much in question. Egbogh1 used the pour point as an additional input parameter for dead oil viscosity correlations .De Ghetto
et al.2 first defined the heavy oils in terms of oAPI gravity. Later, he divided the heavy oil into two groups: heavy oil (10 <
oAPI <22.3) and extra heavy oil (oAPI <10).Hossain and Sarica 3 mentioned that Lohrenz and Bray also used the crude oil
chemical composition to develop an empirical correlation for oil viscosity.
Standing 4 ,in 1947 used a total of 105 data points on 22 different crude oils from California to develop his
correlations. Lasater 5 , in 1958 presented a bubble point correlation using 158 measured bubble point data on 137 crude oils
from Canada, Western and Mid-Continental United States and South America. Vasquez and Beggs 6 ,in 1989 developed
correlations for the solution gas to oil ratio and formation volume factor using 6004 data points. Glasso7, in 1980 used
data from 45 oil samples mostly from the North Sea region to develop his correlations. Al-Marhoun 8 ,in 1988 used 160
bubble point data on 69 Middle Eastern crude samples to develop a bubble point pressure correlation. Ahmed 9 used
the combined reported data of Glasso and Marhoun to develop a correlation for determining the oil formation volume factor.
Labedi 10 ,in 1982 and Petrosky-Farshad 11 , in 1995 used data on fluids from reservoirs in Western Canada, Africa, and
Texas-Louisiana, respectively to develop various correlations. De Ghetto et al. 12 (1994) used about 3700 measured
data points on 195 crude oil samples from the Mediterranean Basin, Africa, Persian Gulf, and North Sea, to evaluate
published correlations, and modified some of them to improve predicted results.
When both universal and regional correlations were applied to new data, a number of studies have shown that no one
correlation stood out as more accurate than all others. Rather different correlations were more accurate in certain ranges of
data while others were more accurate in other ranges.
4.
DATA COLLECTIONS
Data used for this work are used from an Egyptian area which is the Western Desert, and consists of reservoir
temperature, oil gravity, solution gas oil ratio etc within the range as shown in table 1.Quality Check have been made for the
samples before testing them in order to get the reliable results.
Table 1: Data Range for the Egyptian PVT Data
Laboratory measurement Parameters
o
Minimum
Maximum
17.2
1.049
49
7
8
40
0.627
0.11
0.1063
0.4204
51.28
4.47365
4,739
4,739
7,803
270.9
1.93
104.2553
45.1183
147.8802
each measurement is as the following was calculated after testing the program and the results in Appendix:
1
( )
=
100
=1
Expert System
PVT Calculator
Bubble-point
pressure
Dindrouk -Christman
Glasso
10. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the present study and data review the following Table and can be made:
II.
Property
Correlations
Range
<3000 psia
Glasso
<1500 scf/STB
Al-Marhoun 1988
<2.2 bbl/STB
Under-saturated oil
formation volume factor
1-4 bbl/STB
Beal
<60 cp
Khamechi
0-5 cpcp
Labedi
<2*10^-5
Ahmed
I.
The table offers guidelines based on range of applicability and testing
The table is based on several runs and extensive use of PVT Calculator and Expert System
NOMENCLATURE
bbl/STB
Bo
Rso
Pb
API
Boi
STO
Mwo
Viscosity
co
oil compressibility
PPc
Pseudo-critical pressure
PPr
Pseudo-reduced pressure
Pwf
Psp
Mscf/D
Tsp
Separator temperature
oil density
Rs
R si
API
scf/STB
psia
degree
Bbl/STB
lb/lb.
mole
cp
psia-1
STB
psi
psi
scf/STB
g/cc
Mscf/STB
Mscf/STB
REFERENCES
1 - Egbogh ,An Improved Temperature Viscosity Correlation For Crude Oil Systems, A paper selected to be
presented at the 34th Annual Technical Meeting of Petroleum Society of CIM held jointly with the Canadian
Association of Drilling Engineers in Banff May 1983.
2 -De Ghetto at el. Reliability Analysis on PVT Correlations "paper SPE presented at the European Conference
held in London U.K.25-27 October 1994.
3 -Hossain and Sarica ,"Assessment of heavy oil viscosity correlations", SPE 97907-MS paper was prepared for
presentation at the 2005 SPE International Thermal Operations and heavy Oil Symposium held in Calgary ,Alberta,
Canada
4 -Standing, M.B.:"A Pressure Volume-Temperature Correlation for Mixtures of California Oils and Gases,
"Drilling and Production Practice, API (1947).
5 -Lasater, J. A.: "Bubble Point Pressure Correlation", Trans. SPE paper 957-G, May 1958.
6 -Vasquez, M., and Beggs,Correlation for Fluid Physical Property Predictions, JPT June 1989.
7 -Glasso Generalized PVT Correlations, paper SPE 8016 accepted for publication July 79, published May 1980.
8 - AL-Marhoun, M.A., "PVT Correlations for Middle East Crude Oils; Journal of Petroleum Technology", pp. 650666, May 1988.
9 - Ahmed T. ,"Equation of State and PVT Analysis, Applications for Improved Reservoir Modeling: Book Gulf
Publishing Company Houston, Texas.2007.
10 - Labedi, R.M.:"PVT Correlations of the African Crudes, "PhD Thesis, Colorado School of Mines (May, 1982).
11 - Petrosky, G.E., Jr., and Farshad, F.F.: Viscosity Correlations for Gulf of Mexico Crude Oils, paper SPE 29468
presented at the Production Operations Symposium of the SPE, Oklahoma City, OK. April 1995.
12 - De Ghetto at el Pressure-Volume Temperature Correlations for Heavy and Extra Heavy Oils, Paper SPE
30316 presented at the International Heavy Oil Symposium held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada 19-21 June 1995.
13- Al-Mehaidab, Improved PVT Correlations for UAE Crude Oils paper SPE 37691, presented at the 1997 SPE
Middle East Oil Conference and Exhibition held in Manama, Bahrain 17-20 March 1997.
14 -Standing, M. B.: Volumetric and Phase Behavior of Oil Field Hydrocarbon Systems, 9th printing, Society of
Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Dallas, TX (1981).
15 - Vasquez, M.E., and Beggs, H.D.: Correlations for Fluid Physical Property Prediction, Journal of Petroleum
Technology (June 1980) 968-970.
16 - Saleh, Mahgoub and Asaad "Evaluation of empirically derived PVT Correlations for Egyptian crude oils" SPE
15721.
17 - Al -Marhoun M,PVT Correlations for Middle East Crude oils, SPE paper 13718 published in JPT May
2008.
18 - Doklah, M.E. and Osman, M.E:"Correlation of PVT properties for UAE Crudes "SPE formation Evaluation
(March 1992), 7, 41-46.
19 - Farshad, F.F., Leblance, J.L., Garber, J.D., and Osorio, J.G.:"Empirical PVT Correlations for Colombian
Crude Oils, "Paper SPE 24538, 1992.
20 - Kartoatmdjo, R.S.T, and Schmidt, Z.:"New Correlations for crude oil physical properties," paper SPE 23556,
June 1991.
21 - Dindrouk, Christman PVT Properties and Viscosity Correlations for Gulf of Gulf of Mexico Oils paper SPE
71633,presented at the 2001 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in New Orleans, Louisiana ,30
Sept -3 Oct 2001.
22 - Petrosky, G.E., Jr., and Farshad, F.F.: Pressure-Volume-Temperature Correlations for Gulf of Mexico Crude
Oils, paper SPE 26644 presented at the 68th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the SPE, Houston,
TX. (October 1993).
23 - Al-Marhoun, Evaluation of empirically derived PVT Properties for Middle East crude oils Journal of
Petroleum Science &Engineering 42(2004) 209-221.
24 - McCain, W.D., Jr., Reservoir-Fluid Property Correlations State of the Art, SPE Reservoir Engineering
(May 1991) 266-272.
25- Standing, M .B."A pressure-Volume-Temperature correlation for mixtures of California oils and gases", Drilling
and Production Practice, API, pp 275-287 (1974).
26 - Adel M. Elsharkawy, Abbas A. and Ali Khan ,"Correlations for predicting solution gas-oil ratio, oil formation
volume factor, and under-saturated oil compressibility", Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering ,Volume 17,
Issues 3-4, May 1997, Pages 291-302.
27 - Al-Marhoun The Coefficient of Isothermal Compressibility of Black Oils paper SPE 81432, presented at the
2001 SPE 13th Middle East Oil Show & Conference held in Bahrain 5-8 April 2003.
28- Omar and Todd, "Development of New Modified Black Oil Correlations for Malaysian Crudes, SPE 25338
presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil& Gas Conference and Exhibition held in Singapore, 8-10 February 1993.
29 - Arps, J.J."Estimation of Primary oil and gas Reserves, "Rick, T .C. Petroleum Production handbook, Volume2,
Dallas, SPE, 1962, Chapter 37, P.1.
30 - Beal, C.:"The Viscosity of Air, Water, Natural Gas, Crude Oil and Its Associated Gases at Oil Field
Temperatures and Pressures", Trans. AIME (1946) 165, 94.
31- Beggs, H.D., Robinson, J.F., "Estimating the viscosity of Crude Oil Systems," J. pet. Tech. (Sept.1975)11401141.
32 - Khan and Al-Marhoun:Viscosity Correlations for Saudi Arabian Crude OilsPaper SPE 15720 presented at the
fifth SPE Middle East Oil Show held in Manama, Bahrain. March 7-10, 1987.
33- Chew Connally:A viscosity correlation for Gas Saturated Crude Oils, Paper SPE presented at 33rd Annual
Fall Meeting of SPE in Houston, Tex.Oct.5-8, 1958.
34 - Khamehchi,Rashidi,Rasouli and Ebrahimian ,Novel empirical correlations for estimation of bubble point
pressure, saturated viscosity and gas solubility of crude oils Pet. Sci.(2009)6:86-90 .
35- Ahmed. T. "Hydrocarbon phase behavior" Book Gulf Publishing Company Houston, Texas.1989.
36 - Kumar, N. A," Compressibility factors for natural and sour reservoir gases by correlations and cubic equations
of state ", Thesis in Petroleum Eng, 2004: 14, 15, 23.
37 - Whitson C. H. and Michael R. Brule," Phase Behavior ", PVT SPE monograph Vol. 20, Richardson,
Texas,2000.
38 - Al-Khamis M. N., Evaluation of Correlations for Natural Gas Compressibility Factors. M Sc Thesis
Presented to the King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Dahran, Saudi Arabia. March, 1995.
Figures
Dindrouk Christman
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
Standing
Glaso
Petrosky and Farshad
3000
2000
1000
0
0
500
1000
2000
3000
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Glaso
Al-Marhoun
Standing
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Standing
Almarhoon 1988
Doklah and Osman
Al-Mehaideb
Glaso
Vasquez and Beggs
5
4
3
2
1
labedi
1.40E-04
80
1.20E-04
Al-Mehaidab
100
1.00E-04
60
8.00E-05
40
6.00E-05
4.00E-05
20
2.00E-05
0
0.00E+00
0
0.00005
0.0001
experimental co, psi-1
0.00015
Beal
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
experimental saturated oil viscosity, cp
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
experimental under saturated oil
viscosity, cp
2
3
experimental
under saturated
oil
formaton volume factor, bbl/STB
11
T (F)
Dindrouk-Christman
926 1,2230
14.70 40.0
.6017 1.027
117 276
Standing
130 7,000
16.5 63.8
0.59 0.95
100 258
1574 6,523
16.3 45
114 - 288
Al-Marhoun
130 3,573
19.4 44.6
0.5781
0.8519
0.752 1.367
Glaso
Khamechi, Rashidi,
Rasouli &Ebrahimian
Omar &Todd
22.3-48.1
N/A
22.3-48.1
33.4-124
0.65-1.28
0.554-0.858
80-280
100-306
26.6-53.2
0.612-1.315
125-280
15-6,055
15.3-59.3
0.51-1.35
75-294
590-4,640
48-5,780
0.801.29
0.57-1.2
190-275
Lasater
28.240.3
17.9-51.1
Farshad Leblance1
32-4,138
18.0-44.9
Farshad Leblance2
32-4,138
Kartoatmdjo
15-6,055
Rs
(SCF/ST
B)
133
3,050
20
1,425
217
1,406
26
1,602
90-2,637
83-1,708
N/A
21
20.685
14
86.635
11
23.915
17
26.153
N/A
7
34
1421,440
0-2,199
7.17
28
N/A
15
7.61
18
82-272
1812,266
3-2,905
N/A
0.66-1.73
95-260
6-1,645
N/ A
20
18.0-44.9
0.66-1.73
95-260
6-1,645
N/A
20
14.4-58.9
0.38-1.71
75-320
0-2,890
20.17
21
74 240
Table 3: Reported Input Parameters Ranges for Solution Gas Oil Ratio Correlations
Correlation
Limitations
Rso
Reference
o (API)
Property
Pp
Pp (psia)
Pb (psia)
o (API)
T (F)
926
12,230
130
7,000
1574
6,523
130
3,573
1657,142
14.70
40.00
16.5
63.8
16.3 45
0.6017
1.027
0.59
0.95
0.5781
0.8519
0.752
1.367
0.65-1.276
117 - 276
0.5540.858
100-306
19.4
44.6
22.3-48.1
33.4-124
100 258
114 - 288
74 240
80-280
Rs
(SCF/
STB)
133 3050
20
1425
217 1406
26
1602
22.348.1
831708
Reported
Accuracy
Error %
Reference
Property
Table 2: Reported Input Parameters Ranges for Bubble Point Pressure Correlations
Correlation
Limitations
Reported
Accuracy %
Error %
Tables
N/A
21
N/A
14
N/A
11
N/A
17
N/A
N/A
34
co
Reference
Reported
Accuracy
Error % AAE
Property
Table 4: Reported Input Parameters Ranges for Under-Saturated Isothermal Oil Compressibility Correlations
Correlation
Limitations
Pb
(psia)
o
(API)
T (F)
Rs
(SCF/STB)
Co(10-6
1/ psia )
Dindrouk
Christman
926
12230
14.70
40.0
117 276
133
3,050
5.02
31.91
6.21
21
Vazquez and
Beggs
15 6055
15.3
59.5
170
(Mean)
0 2,199
N/A
N/A
15
Petrosky and
Farshad
1574 6523
16.3
45
114 288
217
1,406
3.5
24.64
6.66
11
Al-Marhoun
17.5
44.6
6-56.8
71
240
81-342
24 1,453
27
8-2,986
3.45
31.11
3.02-43
5.46
De Ghetto
106
3331
NA
0.601
7
1.027
0.511
1.351
0.578
1
0.851
9
0.75
1.59
NA
Farshad
NA
13.746.5
0.591.731
95-260
6-1,758
2-34
20
75-320
0-2,890
0.746
1.116
N/A
190306
128-3,871
2.701127.4
N/A
AE-6.86
SD32.5
AAE20.21
AE 0.301
AAE23.67
9.88
N/A
128-306
N/A
10
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.8157.04
N/A
N/A
Kartomdjo and
Schmidt
Al-Mehaidab
5014822
Labedi
N/A
Ahmed
N/A
14.459.0
30.948.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
21
13
Standing
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
El-Sharkawy
24.539.8
0.807
1.234
120243
367-1,568
3.6229.18
15.23
13
Reservoir
Pressure ,
psia
o (API)
T (F)
Rs
(SCF/S
TB)
Bo
(RB/ST
B)
Dindrouk Christman
-------
14.70
40.0
0.6017
1.027
117 - 276
133 3050
Standing
-------
170010,692
16.5
63.8
16.3 45
0.59
0.95
0.5781
0.8519
100
258
114
288
20
1425
217 1406
Al-Marhoun
20-3,573
19.4
44.6
0.753
1.367
74 240
24
1453
1.0845
2.8984
1.024
2.15
1.1178
1.6229
1.032
1.997
Glasso
-------
22.3-48.1
0.65-1.28
80-280
90-2637
15.3-59.3
.511-1.35
75-294
0-2199
Farshad-Leblance
Garber, Osorio
Doklah Osman
18-44.9
.66-1.7
95-260
6-1,645
N/A
20
28.2-40.3
.80-1.29
190-275
1.225
18
26.6-53.2
0.612-1.32
125-280
1.44
28
Al-Mehaidab
30.9-48.6
0.75-1.12
190-306
1.35
13
25-40
0.7-1.00
130-290
7.04
14.4-58.9
0.38-1.71
75-320
1812266
1421,440
1283,871
2001,200
0-2,890
2.025
21
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
EA 1.094
SD 2.5
35
9
N/A
N/A
1.0322.588
N/A
21
N/A
14
N/A
11
EA .88%
SD
1.18%
EA-0.43
SD-2.18
Deviation
5%
N/A
N/A
o(
oAPI )
T (F)
Rs
(SCF/STB)
P , psia
Glasso
0.651.28
22.348.1
80280
90-2,637
4004,000
Al-Marhouns
(1988)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Reference
Bt
Reported
Accuracy
Error %
Table 6: Reported Input Parameters Ranges for Total Formation Volume factor Correlations
Correlation
Limitations
Property
Bo
Reported Accuracy
Error %
Property
Table 5: Reported Input Parameters Ranges for Formation Volume Factor Correlations
Correlation
Limitations
Reference
SD 6.54
Avg devia 4.56
N/A
17
7
15
Pb(psia )
o (cp)
obp (cp)
T (F)
Rs
(SCF/STB)
926
12,230
0.211
10.6
0.1610
8.7
121 276
133 - 3,050
AARE 5.99
ARE -0.83
21
140
4135
1,574
9,522
N/A
107
4,315
5014,822
0.16
315
0.224
4.09
N/A
0.13
71
0.142
127
0.211
3.546
N/A
0.13
17.9
72
292
114
288
50-300
12 - 1,827
N/A
14
21 1,885
2.9
11
N/A
N/A
75-240
24-1,901
1.915
32
N/A
N/A
190306
128-3,871
2.885
13
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
31
1325,645
N/A
N/A
72-292
51-3,544
ARE 2.7
30
N/A
N/A
0.096-586
80-320
2.3-573
6.88
21
60-6,358
N/A
0.1153.72
N/A
N/A
ARE -3.1
10
Dindrouk Christman
Dindrouk and
Christman
Standing
Petrosky and Farshad
Glasso
Khan and AlMarhoun
Al Mehaidab
Beggs-Robinson
Beal
Kartoatmdjo &
Schmidt
Labedi
obp
(cp)
T
(F)
0.896
62.63
0.377
50
0.725
11.69
N/A
0.161
0
8.7
0.3
35
0.211
7.403
0.13
17.9
N/A
0.616
-39.1
0.377
-50
N/A
Al- Mehaidab
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.04-3
Dindrouk Christman
Standing
Petrosky and Farshad
Glasso
Chew and Connally
N/A
Rs
(scf/STB
)
1333,050
Pb,
psia
Reference
oD
(cp)
Reported
Accuracy
Error%
Property
Table 8: Reported Input Parameters Ranges for Bubble Point Oil Viscosity Correlations
Correlation
Limitations
o
b
Reference
Limitations
Correlation
Reported
Accuracy
Error %
Property
Table 7: Reported Input Parameters Ranges for under-saturated Oil Viscosity Correlations
N/A
13.2
21
N/A
0-3544
N/A
N/A
14
N/A
21-1,885
N/A
N/A
11
75240
24-1,901
107431
5
N/A
32
N/A
N/A
33
N/A
13
N/A
34
N/A
72292
F
190
306
100
-
51 3,544
1283871
83-1708
132564
5
501482
2
N/A
Beggs &Robinson
15
N/A
N/A
306
70295
20 2,070
N/A
N/A
o (API)
T (F)
Reference
0.896 62.63
14.70 40.00
121 - 276
12.62
21
Standing
Petrosky and Farshad
0.865 1,550
0.725 10.249
10.1 52.5
25.4 46.1
100 - 220
114 - 288
N/A
12.38
SD 11.25
14
11
Glasso
Labedi
Beggs and Robinson
0.6-39
0.6-4.8
-------
20-48
32-48
16-58
50-300
100-306
70-295
9
10
31
Beal,
Schmidt-and Kartoatmdjo
El-Sharkawy
And Ali Khan
Naseri, Nakizar
Trevor Bennison
Egbogh
0.8-188
0.5-586
0.6-33.7
10-52
14.4-59
20-48
100-220
80-320
100-300
22.1
-2.16
Ea :0.64%
SD :13.53%
24.2
39.6
19.3
0.75-54
N/A
N/A
17-44
8-20
5-58
105-295
100-250
15 -80 C
1
1
1
N/A
14.3-44.6
75-240
7.77
13
Ea -5.13
SD:55.51
N/A
Property
oD (cp)
Reported
Accuracy
%
Table 9: Reported Input Parameters Ranges for Dead Oil Viscosity Correlations
Correlation
Limitations
od
30
21
64
32
31
Glass
o
18.3291
Khan
e2
3.345
Farshad
1.618
99
Leblanc
57
e2
Glass
3.25086
BeggsRobinso
n
11.15
96
Doklah
and
Osman
8.070
57
Farshad
AlMarhou
n 2003
Glasso
0.157
Kartoat
11.56
711
mdjo
86
0.026
319
0.254
77
Petrosky
and
Farshad
Labedi
25.18
12
13.38
86
Ahm
ed
1985
Ahm
ed
1985
Ahm
ed
1985
and
and
Beggs
Beggs
39.03
99
and
60.0513
Beal
0.426
33
Christ
AlMarhou
n
Al12.78
34
Vasquez
Marhou
3.216
32
1988
9.786
and
88
Beggs
Ahm
ed
1985
618
85
0.161
Vasque
851
Petrosk
0.098
Petrosk
0.092
y and
636
y and
78
Farshad
Farshad
Vasque
0.103
Vasque
0.097
33.98
89
99
73
and
and
Beggs
Beggs
Dindr
ouk
%
The best Bo
Correlation in each
report
0.156
Error
Vasque
39.73
report
Average Relative
Correlation in each
%
The best o
Error
report
Average Relative
Correlation in each
%
The best Bo
Error
y and
report
Leblanc
Petrosk
Average Relative
835
The best Bo
0.433
Correlation in each
Farshad
8.380
The best o
Correlation in each
report
Average Absolute
Relative Error
BeggsRobinso
The best Pb
Correlation
35.1214
Average Relative
Error
Average Relative
Error %
Glass
The best o
The best Rs
Correlation
Report Number
23.48
Al-
0.134
Marhou
168
McCain
0.395
209
n 92
man
Kartoat
5
Glass
16.2231
Kartoat
mdjo &
Schmidt
13.97
Standin
8.625
12
025
mdjo
and
2.149
De
5.230
298
Ghetto
315
Ahm
ed
1985
31.65
De
0.168
De
0.200
Ghetto
68
Ghetto
39
De
0.150
Al-
0.199
Ghetto
64
Marhou
52
21
Schmidt
Vasq
Al
uez
and
37.5393
Mehaid
ab
5.104
Kartoat
5.439
135
mdjo
31
Arps
0.118
947
Petrosky
and
Farshad
47.63
69
Ahm
ed
1985
34.00
33
Beggs
Petros
ky
and
Petrosk
38.8111
y&
Farshad
Farsh
Dindrou
Petrosk
0.177
k and
11.10
193
Christm
933
an
1.367
and
29
Ahmed
32.89
331
Farshad
Ahm
ed
1985
6.900
Al-
4.190
Al-
3.949
Mehaid
448
Mehaid
89
ab
ab
53
ad
Vasq
uez
0.26955
and
Petrosk
y&
Farshad
Dindrou
k and
23.05
k and
2.485
443
Christm
253
Christm
91
an
Beggs
9
Glass
o
15.2957
9
BeggsRobinso
n
Dindrou
0.297
5.847
908
10
Lasater
an
5.371
289
40.6262
Khan
2.029
k and
7.225
543
Christm
49
an
11
Alma
rhoun
12
50.079
Khan
0.379
75
Dindr
Christ
man
and
Osman
83.7082
Khan
25
Labedi
45
4.790
48
mdjo
and
0.524
97
Petrosky
and
Farshad
34.01
52
Al1.612
Marhou
1.563
42
452
Ahmed
46.28
98
1988
Al-
1.067
k and
15.00
Marhou
18.68
Elsharka
3.844
715
Christm
56
59
wy
97
an
Ahm
ed
1985
Ahm
ed
1985
7.230
53
Stand
ing
1981
Al-
4.470
Al-
4.380
Mehaid
531
Mehaid
91
ab
ab
Vasque
0.060
32.56
862
57
and
Labedi
0.226
23
Beggs
38.07
51
Petrosk
0.126
Kartoat
0.124
y and
086
mdjo
93
Ahmed
1.962
Farshad
Schmidt
Dindrou
ouk
and
Doklah
0.118
Mehaida
25.39
Kartoat
Dindrou
Glass
Glasso
Al-
1988
Ahm
ed
1985
Ahm
ed
1985
Petrosk
2.631
32.59
y and
16
62
Farshad
26.94
16
64
Vasque
0.257
Vasque
0.257
03
997
and
and
Beggs
Beggs
13
Alma
rhoun
47.8708
Khan
0.358
338
Doklah
and
Osman
17
6.123
39
Dindrou
14
Alma
rhoun
64.7415
Khan
and
Osman
5.963
99
Al-
AlMarhou
n 92
3.421
343
Vasquez
0.445
k and
18.11
Marhou
10.99
58
Christm
431
91
an
15
Doklah
1988
4.934
and
66
Beggs
Ahm
ed
1985
Ahm
ed
1985
34.13
86
Al-
0.312
Al-
0.304
Marhou
234
Marhou
n 92
McCai
14.24
n 92
0.733
442
Al-
0.295
ouk
Mehaid
18
and
48.067
Khan
Christ
81
Doklah
and
Osman
7.311
Standin
5.844
418
44
Al-
Ahm
Marhou
6.383
ed
n 92
33
1985
0.732
09
Dindr
2.299
McCain
28.37
McCain
0.210
39
ab
44
man
16
Petros
ky
and
Beggs19.7647
Robinso
n
Farsh
1.397
595
Lasater
51.42
637
Glasso
1.537
De
5.499
68
Ghetto
971
Ahm
ed
1985
De
0.052
De
0.053
Ghetto
206
Ghetto
51
24.71
9
ad
17
Glass
o
25.6363
Khan
4.738
986
Farshad
Leblanc
e2
Al4.057
Marhou
0.157
Kartoat
1.284
59
971
mdjo
33
2003
18
25.7152
Khan
4.684
186
Glasso
16.86
89
Marhou
0.082
571
2003
19
ed
1985
Vasque
0.001
Vasque
0.001
37.87
77
76
76
and
and
Beggs
Beggs
Kartoat
Al-
Glass
Ahm
mdjoDe
Ghetto
7.070
77
Ahm
ed
1985
37.58
91
0.087
Vasque
0.089
84
913
and
and
Beggs
Beggs
N/A
Petros
ky
and
Vasque
Kartoat
51.8721
mdjo &
Schmidt
Farsh
0.823
918
Farshad
Leblanc
e2
Al6.503
079
Vasquez
Marhou
12.56
01
1988
6.511
and
74
Beggs
Ahm
ed
1985
Al-
0.145
Marhou
91
n 92
23.31
78
ad
20
Petros
ky
and
56.1587
3883
Beal
0.461
533
Lasater
70.97
Standin
7.614
761
04
Ahmed
0.001
144
Farsh
Ahm
ed
1985
Elshark
0.000
Elshark
5.7E-
awy
18
awy
05
Al-
0.062
Vasque
0.049
Marhou
06
247
27.84
87
ad
21
Petros
Dindrou
ky
and
29.3405
Beal
0.441
43
Lasater
1.216
k and
4.308
Elsharka
1.290
655
Christm
47
wy
533
Farsh
an
Ahm
ed
1985
28.50
n 92
and
Beggs
759
ad
22
Dindr
Dindrou
ouk
and
72.0626
Beal
Christ
Al-
0.549
k and
3.086
193
Christm
365
an
Vasquez
Marhou
19.00
52
1988
6.123
and
869
Beggs
Ahm
ed
1985
McCai
0.522
Vasque
0.517
06
74
14.01
and
67
Beggs
man
23
Glass
o
56.0295
7
Vasque
Labedi
8.055
z and
Beggs
3.662
59
24
Glass
o
25
18.0328
Beal
0.781
Vasq
uez
and
Beggs
52.4149
Beal
0.554
2
Glasso
Vasque
z and
Beggs
6.946
79
0.828
87
Doklah
and
Osman
Doklah
and
Osman
Arps
0.064
99
0.521
26
0.615
34
Labedi
Labedi
Labedi
10.80
29
14.06
59
24.06
01
Ahm
ed
1985
Ahm
ed
1985
Ahm
ed
1985
Vasque
0.070
Vasque
0.065
31.98
037
85
25
and
and
Beggs
Beggs
Vasque
0.105
Vasque
0.043
32.40
834
12
54
and
and
Beggs
Beggs
Labedi
34.50
77
0.334
Vasque
0.099
569
42
and
Beggs
Dindrou
26
Glass
o
33.8804
Khan
Al-
4.474
k and
22.57
Marhou
0.165
721
Christm
44
48
an
2003
AlMehaida
b
8.599
01
Ahm
ed
1985
Petrosk
0.161
Petrosk
0.160
37.69
y and
801
y and
14
68
Farshad
Kartoat
27
Glass
o
30.9658
Beal
3.073
487
Farshad
Leblanc
e1
6.620
44
mdjo
and
0.058
257
Petrosky
and
Farshad
35.08
27
Ahm
ed
1985
36.25
38
Farshad
Al-
0.028
Al-
0.027
Mehaid
798
Mehaid
25
ab
ab
Schmidt
28
Petros
ky
and
Kartoat
36.1363
mdjo &
Schmidt
Farsh
0.595
103
Farshad
Leblanc
e2
Al8.716
042
Vasquez
Marhou
0.392
201
1988
0.949
and
911
Beggs
Ahm
34.30
ed
98
McCai
0.267
207
Ahmed
0.715
Al-
0.079
Vasque
0.053
Marhou
35
411
738
1985
ad
29
Dindr
Al-
ouk
and
2.62533
9
Beal
0.703
734
Lasater
2.404
974
Christ
Marhou
7.614
Elsharka
0.870
495
wy
1988
Ahm
ed
1985
26.67
n 92
and
Beggs
81
man
30
Petros
ky
and
Kartoat
70.8259
mdjo &
Schmidt
Farsh
Dindrou
Al-
0.761
k and
68.13
562
Christm
005
an
Marhou
14.85
Kartoat
15.21
33
mdjo
748
1988
Ahm
ed
1985
20.98
Al-
0.422
Marhou
835
Ahmed
2.770
15
85
ad
Dindrou
31
Glass
o
36.7263
Khan
Al-
4.663
k and
32.98
Marhou
0.410
779
Christm
94
213
an
32
2003
Petrosky
and
Farshad
25.20
88
Ahm
ed
1985
Vasque
0.028
De
0.225
36.90
172
Ghetto
172
82
and
Beggs
Petros
El-
0.216
El-
0.218
ky
Sharka
Sharka
309
and
75.2352
Beal
0.251
219
Farsh
AlMarhou
n
139.6
Standin
1.223
Kartoat
18.97
987
17
mdjo
933
Ahm
ed
1985
29.42
wy
wy
19
ad
33
Dindr
ouk
and
42.3917
Beal
0.809
75
Lasater
82.33
786
Glasso
0.062
967
Labedi
23.15
96
Christ
Ahm
ed
1985
Vasque
0.095
Kartoat
0.231
258
mdjo
03
Vasque
0.050
Vasque
0.048
77
31.31
and
56
Beggs
man
34
Dindr
ouk
and
17.547
Beal
0.835
63
Christ
Farshad
Leblanc
e2
4.557
163
Arps
1.469
86
Labedi
4.911
83
Ahm
ed
1985
32.86
and
and
51
Beggs
Beggs
man
35
Glass
o
16.1640
1
Beal
0.849
1
Vasque
z and
Beggs
Al13.61
Marhou
0.103
Kartoat
34.66
891
99
mdjo
35
2003
Ahm
ed
1985
Vasque
0.018
Vasque
0.019
33.13
75
793
77
and
and
Beggs
Beggs