Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Recently a project was undertaken in which TUNRA Bulk Solids (TBS) provided an independent design review for
a transfer chute designed by Wear Applications and Management Services (WAMS). The analysis of the design was
done through the use of Discrete Element Modelling (DEM) software as well as the more traditional Continuum
method. Following the initial design review, possible design revisions were made using the analysis provided by DEM.
1. Introduction
The design of transfer chutes is an important area in the mineral
processing industry, with the main purpose of a transfer chute
being to direct material from one conveyor to another. More specifically, when designing a transfer chute other objectives to consider are ensuring there are no blockages, minimising dust creation, minimising spillage and to minimise wear on the receiving
conveyor belt and/or transfer chute liner. A designer has a number of tools available to them, with the two most common methods of analysis being the predominantly 2D Continuum method
[1] and more recently the use of DEM, which allows 3D flow to
be analysed. Previous work has been undertaken comparing the
Continuum method with DEM in the area of transfer chutes and,
as such, the reader is referred to [2] for detailed information on
this topic.
The Continuum method is generally applied in the design
and analysis of straight on and 90 type transfer configurations,
which are characterised by thin stream, rapid flow conditions
where the material stream depth is typically smaller than the
chute width. The theory is based on calculating the cross sectional material stream parameters at specific locations or areas
of interest within the chute configuration. In contrast, DEM considers each individual particle, with the basic premise being to
monitor each particles motion and the forces experienced by
each particle to calculate its displacement per time step according to Newtons laws of motion.
While the Continuum method has been in use for a number
of years, the use of DEM in solving industrial problems has become more prevalent in recent times due to the rapid increase in
computing power, as well as the increase in availability of commercial DEM codes. In this particular study, TBS provided an independent analysis of a rock-box type transfer chute by making
use of both the Continuum method and DEM.
A DEM simulation was undertaken on a proposed transfer
chute design to study the structure and mode of flow as the bulk
solid material flow interacts with transfer chute geometry. The
transfer chute studied was a WAMS WEARBACK liner-less design
and was to be installed in an underground mine inclined conveyor system. The throughput of the proposed transfer is 4400tph
with incoming and outgoing conveyors travelling at 5.5m/s. The
vertical loading height between the head pulley of the incoming
belt and the impact point of the outgoing belt was approximately
6 metres. The material that was being handled was gold ore and,
due to the typically hard rock nature of the gold ore, the selection of a rock-box type transfer over a hood and spoon design
has the advantage of reducing maintenance costs, particularly
related to chute lining.
62
OVERHEAD
DEM
strength of bulk solid materials. In this modelling, the friction parameters within the DEM software were set to a higher value (than
they would be typically if the fines were modelled) to force the
simulated PSD of material to behave as it would do with the inclusion of fines. To calibrate these friction parameters, an angle of
repose test was used. The angle of repose of the full size material
was 38 degrees and from Figure 2 it can be seen that reasonable
agreement was found.
Skilled
Materials Handling
Specialists in bulk
materials handling
Skilled Materials Handling is one of Australia's leading
engineering and design companies specialising in conveying
equipment for bulk materials handling supplying:
Bucket Elevators
Screw Conveyors
Apron Feeders
Box Conveyors
Double Flap Valves
Weigh Feeders
Mixers
Conveying Chains & Sprockets
Chain Conveyors
Air Slide Conveyors
Pan Conveyors
Sidewall conveyors
Rotary Valves
Pfister Rotor Scales
Spillage Conveyors
Kiln Chain
Head Office: 5/104 Ferntree Gully Rd, Oakleigh Vic 3166 Australia
Phone: +61 3 9544 4188
Fax: +61 3 9544 4827
Email: smh@skilledmaterial.com.au
www.skilledmaterial.com.au
DEM
Figure 4: (a) Side view of material trajectory impact point, and (b) Top view of material trajectory impact point.
Figure 5: (a) Flow through middle section of transfer chute (b) Front view of lower section of transfer showing small degree of
unsymmetrical loading.
64
DEM
using the 2D continuum method and the DEM simulation results considering two almost completely different approaches.
In particular, comparisons between the continuum method and
DEM for the stream depth and velocity reveal a good comparison
based on the assumptions taken.
Some assumptions in the continuum method, namely the
velocity of the material stream as it commences to flow down
the top section of the chute (immediately following discharge)
were underestimated (assumed 0.5m/s); hence the stream depth
in this section is overestimated. Due to the continuum method
treating the material flow as a continuous stream of material and
its independence from particle size, there is a tendency of the
actual stream depth to be up to the maximum particle size bigger
than the continuum method indicates. From Figure 7, it can be
seen that in the analysed transfer configuration bigger particles
are likely to be forced out of the core stream flow, consequently
rolling on top of it (and increasing apparent stream depth).
In comparisons of the two methods, two main regions were
highlighted as providing the greatest possibility of difference
in results/analysis and discrepancy due to assumptions made.
These two areas are the impact area in the upper section of the
transfer chute and loading onto the outgoing conveyor belt. Both
of these regions have in common that they are very dynamic in
nature. The advantage of using DEM then is that it can capture
the inter-particle mechanics occurring in these regions, while
the advantage of the continuum method is that it is based directly
on material properties (DEM parameters are based on material
properties, but it cant be guaranteed that they exactly mirror the
flow properties). This leads the authors to the conclusion that
there is still a place for both methods in solving industry prob-
lems, with each method revealing some analysis that the other
cant. Combined they help to form a more complete analysis of
material flow.
Call PRIME
Reduce your Sourcing costs
Improve Sourcing Efficiency
Reduce Equipment Downtime
475 242
DEM
Figure 9: Loading onto receiving belt (a) Original design (b) Spoon design.
Figure 10: Cumulative abrasive wear along the outgoing conveyor belt.
66
Where b is the coefficient of friction between the belt and the material,
is the bulk density of the material, Vn is
the component of velocity of the material
normal to the belt, V b is the velocity of
the belt and Vp is the component of velocity of the material parallel to the belt.
The above equation was applied to the
two sets of DEM results at the individual
particle level and summed over the entire
length of the receiving conveyor belt. The
results are shown below in Figure 10.
This figure shows the point at which
there is a sharp increase in the abrasive
wear is the point at which the belt is loaded and there is a slight difference in the
loading point of the two designs as can
be seen. This is because the design of the
spoon loads the particles onto the belt
further along the outgoing conveyor belt.
The abrasive wear is a result of the impact
force and velocity and the velocity differential between the belt and the particles. As the figure shows, the cumulative
abrasive wear for both designs increases
over a period known as the acceleration
zone, in which the material is accelerated to the belt velocity, then steadies to
a constant value as no more sliding between the belt and particles occurs. The
figure also shows that the abrasive wear
experienced on the receiving belt for
the spoon design is approximately 50%
lower than for the original design. One
downside to this reduced abrasive wear
on the belt is that obviously there will
be increased abrasive wear on the spoon
due to the material stream; it is expected
maintenance costs for the transfer chute
containing the spoon will be higher than
the costs for the original transfer chute
design.
As described previously, the reason
for the large differences in the abrasive
wear between the two designs can be explained by considering the slip velocities
between the belt and the particles in the
acceleration zone. Figure 11 shows a histogram of the slip velocities in the acceleration zone (defined as length along the
conveyor belt up to a distance of 2.0 m as
shown in Figure 10) for the two designs.
The figure below shows that the range of
slip velocities for the original design is up
to 5.5 m/s, while for the spoon design the
maximum slip velocity noted is approximately 4 m/s. For all slip velocities other
DEM
5. References
than 0.5 m/s, the original design has a greater amount of particles
at each slip velocity increment, causing more frictional energy
loss. Taking an average of the slip velocities in the acceleration
zone reveals the average slip velocity for the original design is approximately twice the average slip velocity for the spoon design,
which is in agreement with the findings presented in Figure 10.
4. Conclusions
The continuum method can readily be applied to non-conventional transfer configurations by applying specific modifications/
!
NOW
[1] A.W. Roberts, Chute Performance and Design for Rapid Flow
Conditions, Chemical Engineering Technology, Vol 26, No.2,
2003, pp163-170.
[2] D. Ilic, W. McBride, A. Katterfeld, Validation of Continuum
Methods Utilising Discrete Element Simulations as Applied to a
Slewing Stacker Transfer Chute, Conference Proceedings, The
9th International Conference on Bulk Materials Storage, Handling and Transportation, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia, 9-11th October 2007.
Contact: Timothy Donohue email Timothy.Donohue@Newcastle.edu.au
Design
ed
& built
in
Austra
lia
Call
from
or
02 4735 7112
www.DustCollectorRentals.com.au