Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
NormalPlane Projection
The normal-plane projection is used to display the intersection of
wells with a plane constructed in space to be normal to the direction of the planned well at the point of interest (Fig. 1). The calculation is repeated at a number of points along the planned well. The
results are superimposed on the same diagram (Fig. 2). The relative separation between the planned and adjacent wells is indicated
by the locus of points obtained at successive depths.
gles to the planned well. The planned well passes through the center
of the disk. If the adjacent wells are represented as hot wires, then
they bum a trace in the disk as the disk is pushed down the well.
Wells that are nearly parallel to the plan tend to have a single large
hole burned in the disk; those with high convergence rates have
lines that move rapidly across the disk with depth.
The disk in Fig. 1 is shown in several positions down a planned
well generally trending northeast. We assume that the planned and
drilled wells start side by side, but Fig. 2 shows that the drilled
well gradually falls behind section and moves to the right of the
planned well.
Plotting Conventions
At first sight, the diagram appears to be confusing; but with training and experience, it is simple and easy to use. The diagram fulfills the four key requirements outlined in the Iiltroduction; however,
a number of important conventions associated with its use deserve
special attention.
Depth Annotation. The depths marked on the paths of the adjacent wells should always refer to the measured depth (MD) in the
planned well at which the normal plane was constructed and at which
the intersection was computed. This practice aids visualization and
decision making. During the drilling of a well, all depths, bit runs,
casing points, and formation tops are normally referred to in terms
of MD. The primary key for all'survey data is the station's MD.
Seen in this practical context, the widespread use of true-verticaldepth (TVD) -referenced diagrams is quite inexplicable. Because
TVD is a derived quantity, it appears to be an indirect and unnecessary complication to require that users convert station MD to TVD
before using the diagram. Furthermore, the use of TVD is ambiguous; because the normal plane is inclined to the vertical, TVD
varies over the plane.
Azimuth Reference. As Fig. 2 shows, diagrams are conventionally plotted in polar coordinates. The angular values should be normalized by the current wellbore azimuth. In this way, the angle
plotted is the sum of the angle of the point relative to the local high
side and the high-side azimuth of the planned well at the depth of
interest. Thus, Point 4 in Fig. 2, which is 153 to the right of high
side and at a depth that has an azimuth of 40, is shown with a
bearing of 193 .
If the planned well consists of a simple buildup followed by a
tangent section, then the high side will always be located at the angle corresponding to the borehole target azimuth. By contrast, a
well with 20 of right-hand walk will start with a high-side arrow
10 to the left of target azimuth and will finish tOO to the right.
Iil cases where high-side azimuth varies over the section represented
by the traveling-cylinder plot, depth-annotated high-side arrows may
be used to show this variation.
We discourage the use of the local borehole high-side direction
as the diagram's zero reference. This practice, a convenient aid
to appreciating the diagram's meaning in simple build-and-hold
cases, leads to difficulties because plots involving complex well
shapes with vertical segments will exhibit discontinuities.
In vertical wells where high side is indeterminate, the angle is
the horizontal bearing of the point from the planned well.
31
~--------------------~N
Well Separations. The nonnal-plane projection provides a physically meaningful representation ofthe subsurface situation and permits actual well separation to be measured irrespective of inclination.
This property is also shared with plan-view plots in the immediate
vicinity of the platfonn only, where all wells are nearly vertical.
Plot Scale. For most effective use, the diagram should be proportioned so that survey errors over the interval of interest are no greater
than 10% of diagram radius.
that result from a rninimum-curvature-type calculation. 13 Circular arcs can be used to defined wellbore trajectories adequately,
even where build and walk rates are defined separately. 14 Some
wells can be specified in as few as three or four segments, the average well in 6 to 10, but never more than 20. The geometrical simplicity of this approach pennits analytic solutions to be developed
for proximity calculations. The limited number of segments results
in computationally efficient planning and collision-checking
procedures.
Appendix A of Ref. 15 summarizes the techniques needed to construct collision scans and to perfonn the principal mathematical operations. It reviews the properties of the circular arc, interpolation
on a circular are, intersection of a survey with a plane, and location of a normal plane intersecting a well from a point and shows
that the shortest distance from a point in a drilled well to a planned
well lies in a plane nonnal to that of the planned well.
100
DOCUMENT
PROCESS
ON
CHECK LIST
DISPLACEMENT
1000
1500
...I
\~~.t.
&
<C
0
~ 2000
a:
w
>
~8
------ C
2500
A
3000
PLAN VIEW
SECTION
TVD
DEPTH KEY:
o - 1000
1500
8 - 2000
$ - 2500
- 3000
.t. -
MOINA
1000
1510
2030
2560
3100
from the costly to the catastrophic. Thus, the operation's manage- tivities in the base office. While it is an essential.part of the wellment procedures must be subjected to a formal quality-assurance design process, its principal business application is as a simple,
check. The resulting systems must ensure that organizational struc- robust tool for collision avoidance at the wellsite.
tures and responsibilities are clearly defined and that all work in
Survey readings are taken while the well is drilled. The travelingthe design stage is formally checked and recorded so that the re- cylinder coordinates can be computed for each station and plotted
sults are traceable and auditable in the event of an unexpected in- on the diagram in the same way as the surveys of the other drilled
wells. Contrary to some impressions, a computer is not necessary
cident.
Planning begins when the engineer receives a geological prog- at the wellsite for collision checking when a traveling-cylinder dinosis. This document will normally detail the anticipated litholo- agram is used. The coordinates for the plot can be estimated by
gy, target location, target-area tolerances, accuracy required of a manual procedure described in Appendix B of Ref. 15. The acsurvey results at target, and desired inclination through target. These curacy of this method is limited by the resolution of the plot scale.
data must be checked carefully before they are entered into the com- Coordinates obviously should not be derived from a l-in./200-ft
puter data base. Independent validation of their correctness is es- [l : 2400] scale drawing if the directional tolerances are on the orsential. A check must be made on survey data in the well if any der of 10 ft [3 m]. Common sense must be used; e.g., a l-in./50-ft
surface casing strings have been batch set beforehand. The deepest [1 : 600] scale drawing could be used if the to!erances were ~ 25
survey station is normally used as the starting point for the plan. ft [8 mJ.
Although use of hand calculations is feasible, the method is greatly
The planner generally should construct the most direct trajectory
from the starting point to the target. Fig. 3 illustrates this iterative facilitated by suitable computer equipment at the wellsite. Because
all the adjacent well data are included on the diagram at the planprocess.
All wells in the vicinity initially should be scanned for possible ning stage, continuous real-time searching of a survey data base
intersection on each pass through the planning loop. Once an ac- . for possible well interference is not necessary at the wellsite durceptable trajectory is defined, all those not presenting a significant ing drilling. Elimination of a satellite survey data base reduces the
collision risk can be eliminated from the plot (by inspection) to im- possibility of errors and cuts out the associated resource-consuming
prove the clarity of the diagram. For long-reach wells, it is advisa- quality-assurance effort required to ensure integrity of the remote
ble to use a drillstring simulator 16 to check that torque and drag data base. The only data that must be loaded to initialize the calculimitations are not exceeded. The required survey accuracy must lation are the details of the well plan. This normally should have
be defined, and the errors associated with the various surveying to be done only once for each well. Considering recent developoptions must be estimated to establish the most cost-efficient ments in satellite-communications technology and the power of the
program. I?
new generation of relational data bases to support distributed busiIt is advisable to record the results of each step of this process ness functions, however, the need to operate in total isolation is
on a well-planning checklist. This sort of document provides a struc- somewhat reduced. II
tured mechanism to check the work independently. If it is then stored
as part of the permanent well record, it can be used to provide a Diagram Interpretation
clear audit trail in the event of a mishap during drilling.
To understand how the plot is interpreted, consider Fig. 4. We can
conclude that a well is being drilled in a southeasterly direction beUse of the Traveling-Cylinder Diagram
cause of the poSition of the high-side arrow. The position of the
at the Wenslte
planned well always remains at the center at all depths. Single shots
The traveling-cylinder diagram has a reputation for being a tool plotted along Path A indicate that the actual well is moving rapidly
confined exclusively to engineering planning and monitoring ac- away from the plan above and to the left of the planned course.
SPE Drilling Engineering, March 1991
33
NO RESTRICTIONS
3100
2560
2560
0
3100
NO RESTRICTIONS
KEY:
TOLERANCE
.............
DO NOT
CROSS ABOVE
(MD in A)
1000
2000
3000
Path C shows a nearby well. This well started off behind and to
the left of the planned well and then came around beneath the
planned path before moving to the right. Note the congestion of
points between 3,000 and 4,500 ft [914 and 1372 m] on Path C.
This feature is interpreted as an interval where Well C and the
planned trajectory run almost parallel to each other before diverging sharply. Path D is a trace characteristic of drilling past an exploration well located to the left of the planned track. The relatively
large distance between the points, compared with those of Path C,
indicates a sharp convergence angle between the wells, in this case
about 45.
When a planned well is being drilled, it is usually close and
parallel to (within a few degrees of) its associated plan. Separation
from the plan is equal to the traveling-cylinder-coordinate radius
value. At common depths, the distances to other wells can be read
directly from the diagram.
Consider in Fig. 4 Path B, which represents single shots in the
well being drilled, and Path C, from a nearby drilled well. Path
B drifts below and to the right of the plan and is converging with
Path C. At 2,000 ft [610 m], the separation is 26 ft [8 m]. A visual
interpolation can be made in Path C to estimate a point at 2,300
ft [701 m]. The separation is now reduced to about 13 ft [4 m].
Again, a visual estimate of the position at 2,500 ft [762 m] can
be made by extrapolating the trend of Path B. A collision is likely
unless corrective action is taken promptly.
This ability to assess well separations rapidly by inspecting a diagram is extremely valuable at the wellsite. The major advantage
is that the complete context can be assimilated at a glance and quantitative judgments made readily. In this respect, the technique is
simpler, cheaper, and more reliable than computerized implementations of PC graphics packages with 3D pan and zoom capabilities.
Scanning Procedure
Once a group of wells has been selected, a scanning procedure must
be adopted that excludes completely the possibility of missing a
collision risk. Some scanning routines carry out foot-by-foot
searches, resulting in lengthy checking times. If a collision scan
is performed with the normal-plane method by making discrete steps
down the planned well, then the method is incapable of detecting
a potential collision when the two wells converge at right angles.
For example, Fig. 7 clearly shows that an intersection will be missed
unless the depth in the planned well can be picked with mathematical precision such that the drilled well lies precisely in the normal
plane of the traveling cylinder.
The difficulty is eliminated by performing the scan down the
drilled well. Scanning down the drilled well involves the calculaSPE Drilling Engineering, March 1991
DISPLACEMENT
DRILLED WELL
tion of the closest point in the planned well from the current point
in the drilled well. In effect, this process is achieved by dropping
a perpendicular onto the planned well. By defmition, this solution
lies in the normal plane of the traveling cylinder and can therefore
be plotted directly onto the diagram. The necessary equations are
given in Appendix A of Ref. 15. Because every point on every
drilled well is checked, this method always produces a solution.
In the event of a perpendicular intersection, the planned well will
appear as a line across the plot with annotations at a constant depth.
This distinction may appear somewhat academic where wells are
drilled from a single central cluster because perpendicular intersections are unlikely to occur. However, perpendicular intersections are very likely when a well is drilled through the cluster of
an adjacent platform.
Scanning must occur down the full length of the drilled well. Under no circumstances should scans or plots be stopped at the point
when a specific separation has been achieved. Real wells have
curves, kinks, and large bends. It is not uncommon to encounter
situations where the well diverges beyond a distance where a Collision is possible only to converge again at a greater depth. This condition, where the well comes back onto the diagram, is especially
likely to occur during infill drilling. In this instance, early wells
may have been drilled with large amounts ofleft-side lead but later
wells that use PDC bits may be drilled with a much more direct
track to target.
Drilled wells should not be significant risks if they come within
only 10% of radius from the edge of the plot. If they do, the plot
is too small. To ensure that a drilled well will always appear, the
scan interval must be less than half the length of a chord at 90%
of the plot radius. Elementary geometry shows that the minimum
scanning interval should be S 40% of plot radius.
When the traveling-cylinder scan is implemented, care must be
taken over "end effects." Unless proper checks are built in to the
procedure, undetected interference is possible if a well drills into
the error cone surrounding a drilled well but does not actually pass
it. If the convergence rate is high, the end of the well could be quite
close to the drilled well with no indication on the traveling-cylinder
diagram. Because the problem disappears altogether if the planned
well passes the drilled well, it is clear that suitable checks for these
end effects must be built into the scanning code and appropriate
warnings issued to the user.
Conclusions
1. The normal-plane traveling-cylinder diagram is a powerful tool
for collision avoidance because it provides a simple representation
of a complex situation, a clear presentation of relative positions
and convergence rates with other wells, a view of the well being
drilled in relation to the planned well with low distortion, and a
means of displaying 3D tolerances around the borehole trajectory
simply and unambiguously.
35
Authors
.John L. Thoro.
good, head of Drill
Ing Technology at
BP exploration Co.
Ltd.'s Drilling Tech
nology Dlv. In
Aberdeen, has 17
years' experience
In drilling engineer
Ing and operations.
He specializes In
Thorogood
Sawaryn
the development
of computerized
methods of well design, collision checking, and directional
survey analysis and has written several papers on various
aspects of well surveying, dlverter systems, and drilling per
formance. He holds a degree In engineering science from
Cambridge U. Thorogood was a 1989-90 Distinguished Lee
turer and serves on the Editorial Review Committee. Steve
.J. Sawaryn Is senior engineer at BP Exploration Co. Ltd. 's
Technology Dlv. In London. He specializes In the development of drllllng-engineering applications and Information systems. He holds a degree In chemical engineering from
Cambridge U.
Acknowledgments
We thank BP Exploration Co. Ltd. for permission to publish the
paper. We also acknowledge the contribution of the many individuals
within BP Exploration and in service companies who have read and
commented on this manuscript.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
SPEDE
References
l. Lyons, E.P. and Mecham, O.E.: "Design and hnplementation ofDirectiona! Drilling Programs, Thums Offshore Islands Development Wells,
36
Original SPE manuscript received for review Feb. 27, 1990. Paper accepted for pubHca
tion Nov. 28, 1990. Revised manuscript received Nov. 13. 1990. Paper (SPE 19989) first
presented attha 1990 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference held In Houston. Feb. 27-March 2.