Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract:
Globally India is reported fifth largest retail market growing with 15percentage per annum. Total
size of Indian retail industry is around INR 16 Trn (RASCI, 2011). It is the largest industry in
India and contributing around 10 percentage of the Indias GDO. Due to change in per capita
income and spending with growth in income, changing lifestyle etc. it is expected to grow 25 %
yearly. This industry provide second largest employment i.e. around 10 %. With the growth of
service sectors and improving the industrial output in India has set the sustainable growth of this
industry.
The paper captures consumer attitude towards private store brand versus private national brand
while purchasing goods from the store. The paper also attempts to study the future prospects of
private label for store owner and future threats for private national brands. The study captures
consumer attitude towards five attributes viz., quality, price, risk, packaging, and brand. The
utility and implication of the proposed study is discussed for owner of retailers, owner of private
national brand, managers and researchers.
Keywords: Private label brands, Retail formats, Consumer attitude, National brands
Cost of Private label brands is lower compare to manufactures brand because of the
lower cost of advertising so customers can purchase the same goods at lower price.
Additionally the private brand retailers are having the more control over the price and
they are able to leverage the price with customer demand. So it can easily meet the
competition and demand both.
Besides it private label is also get the advantageous to display it for the maximum impact.
It can also create the point of purchase advertising display to grab the attention of the
customer.
Consumer
Retailer can have the more control over shelf space and can exert the bargaining power
over the manufacturers.
Review of Literature:
There are significant researches are conducted to understand the impact of consumer behavior
and performance of private label brands among the reputed national brands. The Study of A C
Nielsen (2005) has found that the 56 percentage of the consumer believed that private label
brands are good alternative to various national brands. Chandan & Shilpa (2010) found that the
overall advertising to sales promotion ration at shopping mall is increases from 60/40 to 75/65
percentage.
Frank Boyd (1965) determine that the various consumption, socio economic and shopping habits
of the customers distinguishes the private label brands from the manufacturers brand. Bush
(1987) examine that the demographic and psychographic variables are important to understand
the consumers attitude towards private label brands.
difference in the preference of private label brand by various income groups Code (1971).
The study of Batra and Sinha (2000) examine that the consumer perceived risks are subject
matter of the Search and Experience attributes of the products and it is for different
categories of the private label and national products and brands. In Delhi and Mumbai there is
sales zoom about 40 percentage from the previous year (Economic Times, 2013) which shows
the better opportunity for marketing private label brands.
Proportion
1.66
3.33
0
1.66
0
From the above chart it can analyzed that in the customers shopping portfolio food bazaar
contribute the major share. The food department has a major role to play in the customer buying
habits. The second major contribution is of apparels or the fashion bazaar followed by staples
and home fashions.
From the study it was founded that 45% of the customers know about offers and schemes
through newspapers. The people in Rajkot city are more habituated to read newspapers so they
are more influenced by that. The second most preferred source is words of mouth, 40% of
customers are influenced it followed by in store advertisements, and television. The other
important aspect is the other sources called website, and hoardings are ineffective for the
customers of Rajkot.
From the basic information of consumer it was also analyzed that out of the total respondents
(customers) only 66.67 % are aware about the private label brands available in the big bazaar
store and remaining 33.33 % are unaware about the private label brands.
Comparative Analysis of Private Label Brands & National Brand:
Hypothesis:
The following null and alternative hypothesis has been framed for this study. Here we assume
that both the variables are independent.
H0: There is no significant difference between consumer attitude for Private Label
Brands and National Brands
H1: There is significant difference between consumer attitude for Private Label
Brands and National Brands
Table 2: Consumer Attitude toward Private Label (PB) & National Brand
Sr No. Parameters
1
Quality
Price
Risk
Packaging
Brand
Brand Category
PB
NB
PB
NB
PB
NB
PB
NB
PB
NB
18
62
-32
17
-28
33
43
76
-5
88
Source: From primary data collection
The major consideration is that despite of infancy stage of the products of private label brands
the price structure of it has no significant difference in comparison to the products of national
brand being in the maturity stage. The major consideration is that the customers feel more
secured when they know the brand but in case of private brand they have more threat of risk in
comparison to the product of national brands. The major consideration is that the customers are
always attracted by elegant packaging. In terms of packaging the customers rated the products of
national brands superior than products of private label brands. The major consideration is that the
customers are always attracted the products having better brand image. In terms of brand image
the customers rated the products of national brands superior than products of private label
brands.
Table 3: Single Factor ANOVA Test
Su
Groups
PB
NB
ANOVA
Averag
Count
5
m
-4
e
-0.8
Variance
1000.7
276
55.2
876.7
P-
Source of Variation
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
SS
7840
7509.6
15349.6
df
1
8
9
MS
7840
938.7
F
8.351976
value
0.0202
F crit
5.317655063
Here the p-value is less than 0.05 that indicates the significant difference in attributes of private
label and national brands. We can reject the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis is
accepted. Hence, there is significant difference between consumer attitude towards national and
private label brand.
Conclusion:
From the above analysis we can conclude that consumer perceived value and attitude towards
private label brands and national brands are significantly different so retailers has to put extra
efforts to change the attitude of the consumer for private label brand. Additionally following
issue can be recommended for Big Bazaar.
The customers should be informed about the offers and schemes associated with the
products of the private label brands.
Special Zone should be developed to enhance the selling of private label brands.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. B S Hundal, Significant Considerations in the Purchase of Consumer Durables: A Study of
Formats: A Study of Delhi and NCR. Indian Journal of Marketing, February 2009.
8. Frank and Boyd, Are Private Brand prone Grocery Customers Really different?, Journal of
Publication, 18-72.
10. Hitesh Bhatia, Retail Business in Indian Revolution or Evolution? Marketing Mastermind,
January 2010.
11. http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/download.php?downloadid=448
12. http://www.indiainbusiness.nic.in/industry-infrastructure/service-sectors/retailing.htm
13. http://www.indiaretailing.com/Featuresdetails.aspx?Id=84
14. Mathew Joseph and Nirupama Soundararajan, Impact of Organized Retailing on the
Unorganized Sector, Indian Council For Research On International Economic Relations, May
2008.
15. Nitu Saxena, Changing Consumer Behavior and its Influence on Organized Retailing in
January 2010.
18. Pantalonsretailindialmd.com
19. Pradhan Swapna: Retailing Management, third edition 2004, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing