Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
MINISTER OF LABOR
Feb. 28, 1985
Cuevas, J.:
Facts:
Private respondents Zenaida Bustamante, Luz Raymundo and Ruth
Corpuz were employees of petitioner, a domestic corporation engaged
in the business of manufacturing and exporting of mens, ladies, and
childrens dresses.
Petitioner filed three (3) applications for clearance to terminate
employment of private respondents on the following grounds:
o Against Ruth Corpuz for allegedly defacing companys property
by placing a check mark on a jacket with a chalk.
o Against Luz Raymundo for insubordination for refusal to work on
her rest day.
o Against Zenaida Bustamante for abandonment for failing to
report for work after the expiration of her suspension.
The three opposed the clearance application and filed separate
complaints for illegal dismissal.
During the period of their employment, Raymundo and Bustamante
were given 3 consecutive warnings for allegedly refusing to render
overtime work. They were penalized with one weeks suspension.
Raymundo was required to work on a Sunday despite her request for
exemption because it was her rest day. Her request was disapproved.
Consequently, she was notified of her dismissal upon expiration of her
suspension.
Corpuz was also given a warning for refusal to render overtime work.
She was subsequently dismissed for having written a chalk mark on a
nylon jacket for export allegedly in violation of Rule 26 of petitioners
rules and regulations.
The acting director of NCR MOLE issued an order which granted
petitioners application for clearance to terminate the employment of
respondents.
Respondents appealed to the NLRC. On the other hand, the acting
director elevated the records to the Office of the Minister of Labor.
Minister of Labor reversed the appealed order and directed the
petitioner to reinstate private respondents to their former positions
without loss of seniority rights and privileges and with full backwages.
Petitioners MR denied. Hence, this petition. At this point, case only
concerns Raymundo and Bustamante due to the withdrawal of Corpuz.
ISSUE:
WON sufficient legal grounds exist to justify the dismissal of private
respondents Luz Raymundo and Zenaida Bustamante.
HOLDING/RATIO:
NO.
While it is true that it is the sole prerogative of the management to
dismiss or lay-off an employee, the exercise of such a prerogative must
be made without abuse of discretion for what is at stake is not only
private respondents positions but also their means of livelihood.