Initial road safety activity Road Safety

Management Capacity Review

East Java/ Western Australia Twinning Program

Province of East Java

Presentation by Eric Howard, Tri Tjahjono and Tony Bliss

19th March 2013, Surabaya

Global development priority

Improving global road safety has become linked
with the broader vision of sustainable
development and priorities addressing poverty
reduction and the achievement of the Millennium
Development Goals.
This is in line with the concept of country
development which has shifted from a narrow
focus on income and spending to include
education and health, and social, cultural and
political participation.

Global development priority (contd)

The overarching goals of development are to
foster an investment climate conducive to
increased
growth,
productivity,
and
employment, and to empower and invest in
people so that they are included in the process.

In low and middle-income countries the sheer

scale of health losses from road crashes makes
road safety a development priority.
Of particular concern is that road deaths and
injuries are a growing crisis for young people;
especially young men.

Global development priority (contd)

Global Burden of Disease findings for 2010
indicate that for the global population road
deaths were the 8th leading cause of death:

1 4 years
5 9 years
10 14 years
15 19 years
20 24 years
25 29 years

50 55 years

9th
4th
2nd
1st
1st
2nd
10th

Source: IHME (2012). Global Burden of Disease 2010 leading causes and risks by region
heat map, Institute of Health Metrics, Seattle.

Global development priority (contd)

Without sustained new initiatives, more than
75million deaths and 750 million serious injuries
could be anticipated with some certainty over the
first 50 years of the 21st century.

This can be compared with an estimated 1%

probability that over the same period more than
40 million people could be killed in mega-wars or
in a virulent influenza epidemic and around 4
million people by volcanoes or tsunamis.

Millions

Projected global deaths

5

World

4.5

Do nothing: no lag model

Do nothing: 1 lag model
Policy era: no lag model
Policy era: 1 lag model

Annual Global RTI Deaths

3.5

2.5

1.5

0.5

2000

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

2035

2040

2045

2050

Source: GRSF work in progress. Refer also to Bhalla, K, Shahraz, S, Naghavi, M, and Murray, C (2008). Estimating the
potential impact of safety policies on road traffic death rates in developing countries, poster presented at 9th World
Conference on Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion, Merida, Mexico, March 2008.

Fatal discontinuities

Probabilities of fatal discontinuities during the first half of the 21st century
Source: Smil, V (2008). Global Catastrophes and Trends: The Next Fifty Years, MIT Press.

Decade of Action goal

An ambitious goal to stabilize and then reduce the
forecast level of road traffic fatalities in low and
middle-income countries by 2020 has been set for
the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011 2020.

Achieving this goal will save around 5 million lives

and avoid 50 million serious injuries, for a social
benefit of US $3 trillion. Nearly 60% of the lives
saved and serious injuries avoided will be in the
World Banks East Asia Pacific and South Asia
regions alone.

Co-benefits of integrated initiatives

There has also been a growing recognition in
transport policy formulation of the need to align
road safety priorities with other higher priority
sustainable development goals, especially those
for urban areas, to capture the associated cobenefits of integrated initiatives.
For example, the provision of safer infrastructure
facilities to promote increased walking and
cycling and measures to reduce vehicle speeds
will also result in reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions and local air pollution, greater energy
security, and improved physical wellbeing.

Implications for Indonesia and East Java

Indonesia and East Java are facing a growing crisis
of death and injury on their roads with
motorcyclists and pedestrians being particularly
vulnerable.
It must be expected that with rapid motorization
road fatalities and injuries will increase per capita
over the coming decades, unless concerted action
is taken (F/P = V/P x F/V).

Potentially effective interventions can be identified,

such as more protective infrastructure, lower
speeds, safer vehicles etc. But the issues as
identified by the capacity review findings are
more pressing at the institutional level.
10

Implications for Indonesia and East Java (contd)

Substantial resources have been committed to
improving the mobility of East Javas citizens and
central questions that must be addressed concern
the level of safety desired across the road
network and which agencies are responsible and
accountable for this?
In answering these questions it is useful to
consider the road safety management framework
used for the capacity review.

11

Road safety management system

12

Results focus
In the framework presented what has been
termed results focus is the primary, overarching
institutional management function.
This addresses the issue of leadership, strategy
and ownership. What are you trying to achieve?
How are you going to get there? Who is
accountable for this?
The other six identified functions contribute to
the achievement of the desired results. How do
you coordinate this? Legislate for this? Fund this?
And so on.

13

Ownership and authority

Form should follow function and there is no
best practice model for institutional structures.
In best practice countries a coherent machinery
of government with a well-defined focus on
results is evident, where participating agencies
have clearly mandated safety goals and
responsibilities and work purposefully together
under the direction of the lead agency to
achieve them.

Without this results focus, institutional

ownership and authority to act the problem of
improving poor road safety performance
cannot be solved.
14

Ownership and authority (contd)

A coordination body will only be effective when
there is an accountable lead agency that owns and
uses it to mobilize resources and align multi-agency
partnerships in pursuit of agreed results.
A high-level working group is required to support
the strategic decision-making and directing role of
the coordination body, and this working group is
usually resourced and sustained by a road safety
secretariat/department in the lead agency.
The capacity review findings highlight these issues.

15

Evolution of results focus

1950s

the road user blame the victim

1960 70s

systemic interventions the

Haddon matrix.

1980 90s

targeted national plans.

90s onwards Safe System approach.

The Safe System approach is being promoted as best
practice to low and middle-income countries, in stark
contrast to the fatalistic pathway of high-income
countries during most of the 20th century.
16

Managing risk (1)

Source: Claes Tingvall, Swedish Road Administration

17

Managing risk (2)

Source: Claes Tingvall, Swedish Road Administration

18

Managing risk (3)

Source: Claes Tingvall, Swedish Road Administration

19

Managing risk (4)

Source: Claes Tingvall, Swedish Road Administration

20

Innovation and creativity

High-income countries continue to make significant
investments in road safety and have set themselves
ambitious fatality and injury reduction goals.
In following this pathway Indonesia and East Java
must seek solutions that reflect their unique safety
priorities and address their unprecedented rates of
motorization and road user vulnerability .
Huge investments will be made to improve road
transport infrastructure and services over the
coming decades and sustained innovation and
creativity will be required to do this more safely.

21

Road Safety in East Java:

Review of Road Safety Management Capacity

Supported by AusAID through IndII, plus in-kind support

from Department of Transport, East Java and Office of
Road Safety, Western Australia.
Being conducted through Provinsi Dinas Perhubungan by
road safety experts, Eric Howard, Dr.Tri Tjahjono and Tony
Bliss

22

Outline
East Java/ Western Australia Twinning Agreement

Review tasks and workshop aims

Review process and findings
Short and Longer term strategy
Proposal for initial activity for short term
knowledge transfer
management arrangements
intervention priorities
demonstration projects
policy reviews

Next steps
Discussion
23

East Java/ Western Australia Twinning

Agreement

Road safety capacity review the initial road safety

project under the existing East Java/ Western Australia
governments twinning agreement.
Commenced - November 2012

24

The review tasks

Assess road safety management capacity in East Java
against good practice
Advise on a short (and long) term investment strategy
for road safety in East Java
Reflect back to stakeholders on basis of information
provided

25

Aims of workshop
Brief you on our findings to date
Seek your response and input
Discuss any changes to proposals

26

Review Process
and Findings

East Java Road Safety Management Capacity Review 2013

27

Review process
Extensive meetings December 2012/ January 2013, with agencies

Face to face meetings wide range of stakeholders ( > 70 people)

included:

Assistant Governor, Economic Development

Key provincial departments - Transport, PU, Planning,
Education
National agencies (Traffic Police, DGH, Jasa Raharja)
Local governments
University Transport Departments
Industry
Western Australia Office of Road Safety
WA Trade Commissioner

Review conducted against standard World Bank checklists

28

Review process
Review process - based on that applied by World Bank in
many middle income countries to assist them to:
identify major road safety issues;

identify the capacity issues within organisations (knowledge and

resources and impediments to change to achieve road safety
improvement); and across govt.; and
develop an investment strategy for short term (seeking to
strengthen capacity through doing usually demonstration
projects) and in outline for the longer term.

29

The road safety management pyramid

Results

Interventions

Institutional management functions

30

Review of institutional arrangements

Our task was to review capacity for:
Leadership to achieve results ?
Funded coordination across levels of government
and between provincial agencies?
Legislation to meet road safety task ?
Funding and resource allocation ?
Promotion at high level ?
Monitoring and evaluation ?
Research and knowledge transfer ?

31

Review of interventions
To review scope and safety quality of standards
and the levels of compliance for:
the road network ?
the vehicle fleet ?

road users including the most vulnerable ?

access to the emergency medical system and
rehabilitation of victims ?

32

Review of results
To review if data is available for:
socio-economic costs ?
numbers of deaths and serious injuries (including by
user and crash type?)

average speeds, helmet use, seat belt use etc. ?

quantities of interventions e.g. Numbers of seat belt
checks, red light running

hours of checks, speed checks etc. ?

33

Road Safety International and Indonesian

perspectives
2011 to 2020 United Nations Decade of Action for
Road Safety
Indonesian National Road Safety Action Plan (NRSAP)
published in 2011, (based on UN Decade of Action), for
period to 2035.
Targets reductions in fatalities of 50% by 2020 and 80%
by 2035, (from 2010 baseline)

34

Findings: institutional management

Road safety management across levels of government
and within provincial government yet to be established
Leadership role and coordination not yet in place
Little focus on achieving results
Serious lack of human and financial resources in road
safety across provincial and national government.
Exceptions in some Kota
Crash data to guide targeting of action not available
Unsurprisingly, interventions are limited in scope and
fragmented and outcomes are challenging
35

Findings: institutional management (2)

Indonesian National Road Safety Action Plan (NRSAP),
2011 sets challenging targets for Indonesia
Little awareness of Plan in East Java
Plan set out explicitly to serve as a guideline for
Provincial governments (in order for them) to elaborate
steps of road safety management in their respective
territories**
Provincial action plan yet to be developed for East Java
showing how this (or any other) target might be
delivered at provincial level.
**National Road Safety Master Plan, Republic of Indonesia, 2011
36

Findings: interventions
Roads: Safety quality of network is not high

East Javas national and provincial (and many

kabupaten) road networks could be considered high risk
Right of ways extremely constrained, alignment
improvement options very limited, little access or illegal
use controls
Intersection controls lacking
Safety provisioning for motorcyclists and pedestrians
poor, especially where trucks high % of traffic.
Costs of improving safety of infrastructure on national
and provincial network substantial
Poor speed management and limited urban area safety
management
Lack of understanding of differences in crash risk at
network wide level
37

Findings: interventions
Vehicles:

Vehicle mix and safety of design has profound effect

on safety:
Trucks and buses mixing with motorcycles is high risk
especially on higher speed roads
No constraints on any vehicle type travelling anywhere day
or night
Safety quality of fleet needs to be understood and improved:
new and existing (different issues)
No promotion of consumer information e.g vehicle safety
ratings
38

Findings: Interventions
Users: Rules established but not yet deterring
unsafe behaviours - through combined publicity
and enforcement:
e.g

excess speed
non use of seat belts
non use of crash helmets
non compliance with red lights
not giving way to pedestrians at crossings
unsafe overtaking by buses and trucks and other
vehicles
39

Findings: Interventions
Users (2):
Enforcement effectiveness limited by factors including
justice system constraints
Road safety policing requires substanial ongoing
enforcment effort, with warnings and offences issued
Pro-active enforcement by Police targeting major fatal
crash related illegal behaviour factors - as a regular high
intensity effort (in time and across the Province with
substantial resource) - would deliver major fatality
reductions

40

Findings: interventions
Emergency medical system:
Injury data not available through medical system
Lack of focus and resource on road injury prevention
Limited capacity of emergency medical response
Constraints on rapid admission to care

41

Findings: challenging results - 2011

High numbers of deaths: 5,499 in 2011
High death rates: 14.52 (per 100,000 pop.)
4.90 (per 10,000 vehicles)
Rates over three (3) times as high (per 100,000
population) and over 7 times as high (per 10,000
vehicles) as Asia Pacifics best

42

Findings: challenging results

Population fatality rate (population) is 10% higher
than for all Indonesia
High socio-economic costs: estimated at 2.5% of
Provincial GDP - which is $ US 2.3 billion.
One fifth of all deaths (2011) were in Greater
Surabaya, 7% of all deaths were in Surabaya City

43

Findings: challenging results

- fatalities by local government area

44

Findings: challenging results

- fatality rate per population by local government area

45

Findings: challenging results

What locations to investigate as priority in terms of
fatality outcomes?
Four municipalities in top 10 of fatalities and within top 10
of fatality rates per population in East Java where early
review of road crash fatalities would be warranted, are:
Banyuwangi
Pasuruan
Nganjuk
Lamongan

46

Findings: challenging results

All crashes by age of involvement

47

Findings: challenging results

Central Java Fatalities by road user
Detailed police collected crash data from IRSMS system being
introduced nationally - available for 2011 for Central Java
Province shows for Central Java in 2011:
50% of fatalities were motorcyclists
22% of fatalities were pedestrians
25% of all road fatalities were 16 and 17 year old males

Therefore 16 and 17 year old males (usually motorcycle riders)

should be a focus of road safety efforts.
Experience in East Java Province likely to be similar.
48

Findings: challenging results

East Java unlicensed driving / riding
East Java license status for crash involved riders and
drivers:

49

Future outcomes without new action ?

East Java rapidly motorising more deaths and
injuries will occur unless action is taken
The loss of main wage earner in crashes will push
more families into poverty, with higher risks for
children
Substantial economic costs of lost productive years of
human capacity will continue to increase

50

Review findings: strengths

Most stakeholders recognise that serious road
safety work has barely started in East Java
Desire to improve outcomes and activity towards
good middle income country practice
Recognition of need to work together to improve
outcomes via new institutional arrangements and
strengthened capacity
Good quality (if small scale) road safety research
capacity exists in at least two Universities in East
Java
51

Need for leadership

Effective organization to achieve desired road
safety results requires strong leadership
In good practice states or countries this role is
played by a lead governmental agency.
Formal establishment of a lead agency/
department for road safety should be a provincial
priority.

52

Review: conclusion
East Java has to start its long road safety journey
With political will to ensure
o provincial leadership capacity
o focus on achieving results
o effective coordination across agencies at national/ provincial/ local
levels
o demonstration project implementation
o improved funding mechanisms and sources
o high-level promotion of public awareness
o appropriate research capacity development and knowledge
development and transfer
Many lives could be saved and injuries prevented

53

Short term and longer term strategy

The phases of investment strategy: World Bank Guidelines, 2009

54

Short term action:

Phase 1: Establish road safety management
capacity as a priority

knowledge transfer
management arrangements
intervention priorities
demonstration projects
policy reviews

55

Key matters to be addressed in Phase 1

Who is responsible for road safety in East Java?

Who will lead road safety ?
How will interventions be developed and coordinated ?
How will interventions be funded ?
How can demonstration projects help this activity?
How will future action plans be developed, promoted
and monitored?
What level of safety is acceptable for East Java?
What level of safety is achievable in East Java ?

56

Key actions proposed for Phase 1

Work with partners in East Java; with WA; with national agencies
to transfer knowledge

Appoint lead agency for road safety

Establish fully funded intergovernmental road safety decision

making and consultative arrangements

Agree intervention priorities for short term

Build capacity through 3 early demonstration projects

Implement demonstration projects and monitor performance

Conduct 2 or 3 priority policy reviews

57

Work with partners in E Java; with WA; with

national agencies on knowledge transfer
Focus on means to improve road safety outcomes
Build knowledge within agencies and across agencies

Utilise existing university based centres of expertise

Build effective knowledge transfer linkages and obtain
other technical assistance from WA
Develop knowledge transfer linkages with DGH and
MoT (DGLT)
58

Appoint lead agency for road safety in East

Java
Designate Transport as lead department (first among
equals) to support operation of proposed Provincial
Road Safety Committee (PRSC) and Road Safety
Working Group (RSWG).
Transport to provide secretariat services to these
bodies and coordination support to all agencies - in
addition to own responsibilities
Specify its formal objectives, functions and resourcing
requirements
59

Establish fully funded Intergovernmental road

safety decision making and consultative
arrangements

Establish Provincial Road Safety leadership, decision making and

consultative arrangements (at several levels):
intergovernmental PRSC
chaired by Provincial Secretary
members to include Head Traffic Police East Java; Head Balai
Besar V; Principal Secretaries for Transport, Public Works,
Education, Health and Planning of East Java Province; and Head
Transport, City of Surabaya with other kota/ kabupaten
attending as necessary, Jasa Raharja)
meeting quarterly and supported by the lead agency.
60

Establish fully funded Intergovernmental road

safety decision making and consultative
arrangements (2)
PRSC to be supported with Road Safety Working Group
(RSWG)
senior representatives from all key departments meeting
monthly
develop advice to the PRSC and implement PRSC decisions.
chaired by Head of Transport Department Road safety section

RSWG to report to PRSC.

PRSC to publish agreed governmental agency road safety
roles at national, provincial and local government level

61

Establish fully funded intergovernmental road safety

decision making and consultative arrangements (3)

Road Safety in East Java

PROVINCIAL ROAD SAFETY MANAGEMENT

PROGRAM LEAD
SUPPORT
Resourced road
safety cell (technical
and administrative)
within Dinas
Perhubungan
Provinsi

PROVINCIAL ROAD SAFETY COMMITTEE

Chair- Provincial Secretary plus Head Traffic
Police East Java, Head Balai Besar V, Heads of
Transport, Public Works, Education, Health &
Planning for East Java Province and Kota
Surabaya and Jasa Raharja representative
ROAD SAFETY MANAGERS GROUP
Chair Dinas Perhubungan Road Safety
Manager, plus Senior traffic police Manager,
Managers (road safety) for Public Works, Spatial
Planning, Education, Health; Kota Surabaya and
Jasa Raharja representative

LOCAL
GOVERNMENT
LIAISON -

TECHNICAL WORKING GROUPS

Individual experts inside and outside government

ROAD SAFETY ADVISORY GROUP

Experts and organizations

62

Build intergovernmental road safety decision

making and consultative arrangements (4)
PRSC (and all agency members) with support of lead agency
to:
be responsible for leading and managing design and
implementation of road safety demonstration project.
facilitate cooperative working and coordination across
agencies to achieve demonstration projects planning,
design, delivery, coordination and monitoring and
evaluation
oversee selected road safety policy reviews
support budget allocation requests to increase road safety
resourcing for key provincial agencies.
63

Build intergovernmental road safety decision

making and consultative arrangements (5)
eg., recommend six (6) additional positions be
established within Transport department as road safety
group - to provide secretariat and technical support to
RSWG and PRSC and support for Transport road safety
activities - road safety policy based on safe system,
statistics and research, safety economics, road user
behaviour, safety promotion

PRSC and RSWG to actively utilise road safety element

of twinning arrangements with WA to build capacity of
road safety staff

64

Agree intervention priorities for short term

Interventions should always be based on evidence:
Recommended priorities (including within demonstration
projects) should include:
deterrence of under age unlicensed riding
lower travel speeds through lower limits and
enforcement and infrastructure (eg pavement platforms) in
urban areas, especially near schools - and on rural roads
where trucks mix with motorcyclists and no separate lanes,
and near bus stops

provision of separate lanes for motorcyclists on high crash/

high speed lengths
deterrence of unsafe overtaking enforcement by buses and
trucks

crash helmet wearing enforcement

65

Agree intervention priorities for short term

(2)
compliance with road rules, red lights and pedestrian
crossings
intersections infrastructure and signage/ signal
treatments plus lower speed limits and enforcement
pedestrian crossing facilities at intersections and mid
block and at schools
infrastructure safety investment to reduce motorcyclist
and pedestrian serious casualty crash risk on high risk
sections of the network plus pro-active police
enforcement.
66

Build capacity through 3 Demonstration

projects
Three projects suggested:
Safer higher speed road section (rural)

Safer outer urban arterial road section

Safer urban area

67

Demonstration projects planning and

design
Planning and design
Implementation

Monitoring and Evaluation

Management and technical capacity development

68

Demonstration projects planning and

design (2)
PRSC to lead and manage demonstration projects learning by
doing projects - in 3 locations:
Safer Higher Speed Road Location,
Safer Outer Urban Arterial Road Area and
Safer Urban Area.

Good practice safety interventions to be applied at demonstration

project locations to rapidly improve road safety performance.
RSWG to coordinate development and design of initiatives across the
sectors - by individual agencies - based on Safe System principles
Develop and design multi-sectoral initiatives to target current
priority fatal and serious injury crash risks
69

Demonstration projects planning and

design (4)

Obtain technical assistance (T/A) to define project management in

planning stage, plan interventions and define intermediate
outcome targets and data survey protocols

Terms of Reference for this T/A to PRSC for detailed demonstration

project preparation task - will be provided with final report.

Interventions to include: procurement and training in use of

equipment by police (and transport) to intensify enforcement,
coordinated delivery of infrastructure works, traffic signage and
signals, other project components including public campaigns,
school education, upgraded emergency call out and response
system and emergency care.

70

Demonstration projects planning and

design (5)

PRSC to establish priorities and budget requirements for engagement

internationally for professional knowledge development and
mentoring, including earlier T/A (especially from Western Australia) to
support specific needs such as:
Traffic Police: training and roll out of upgraded enforcement capacity
(strategy, equipment, support and levels of task resourcing)
Balai Besar V and Provincial PU: safe road infrastructure design safe
system understanding and application to rehabilitation, especially
intersections and hard shoulders (depending on whether national or
provincial road)
Transport Department: development of heavy vehicle driving hours
controls and overloading enforcement strategies, signage, signals
Health: Emergency response system and rapid admission to care
Education: programs for childrens education in demonstration project
locations, treatments outside schools, managing safe school access
71

Developing and implementing demonstration

projects to support capacity building
Build capacity through 3 demonstration projects to
commence as soon as possible
Implement Demo projects and monitor/ report on road
safety performance

72

Advisory group expert and industry

Once demonstration projects confirmed, establish
Advisory Group to provide advice for project
preparation and implementation.

Membership comprising State, National and

International experts, some industry representatives
and reporting to the RSWG and PRSC.

73

Demonstration projects implementation

PRSC to obtain further technical assistance support for final pre

implementation planning for demonstration projects

RSWG to coordinate rollout of initiatives by individual agencies

Project monitoring and evaluation framework to be established

involving:
confirm intermediate outcome indicators which are to be measured before and
during demonstration projects period
measurement on ongoing basis during projects operation
recording of crash and crash injury data for demonstration projects locations
comprehensive evaluation of performance

RSWG to report findings to PRSC and ensure preparation of

guidelines to assist replication of effective interventions across E.
Java
74

Conduct 2 or 3 priority policy reviews

Review selected current policies against international good
practice, identify options for improvement and consider
recommendations
PRSC to resolve technical assistance and budget
requirements for reviews
Options for reviews include:
o
o
o
o
o

Ensuring hospital admission for injured crash victims

Reviewing opportunities for Jasa Raharja to invest in road safety activities
Driver licensing
Heavy commercial vehicle safety
Enforcement of road traffic law deterrent policing and the penalty
system
o Public Bus Operating Safety
75

Utilising capacities developed from

demonstration projects
Management and technical capacity development
gained from design and delivery of demonstration
projects, will underpin replication of successful
interventions throughout East Java.
PRSC to overview ongoing building of technical and
management capacity for road safety in lead
department and other key governmental departments.
Pursue through East Java/ Western Australia Road
Safety Twinning Program and other means

76

Further short term road safety actions

Other specific road safety actions which could be addressed in
the next three years include:
Urgent review of legislative and justice arrangements to
improve enforceability of road laws, strengthen deterrence
through penalties increases and automated enforcement
Leadership by government in selecting safe fleet vehicles,
requiring similar standards for taxis and committing to
providing positive role modelling across government by
complying with traffic laws.
Having the IRSMS crash system data for East Java
continuously reviewed
77

Phase 2 : Prepare a road safety action plan

for East Java
Develop Provincial road safety action plan (end 2016) to be implemented to deliver new 2020 target.
Monitoring of road safety program by PRSC
Draw upon knowledge acquired in demonstration
projects and other capacity development.

78

Phase 2 : Prepare a road safety action plan

for East Java (2)
Establish annual sustainable funding mechanisms for
road safety as a priority
Review any issues inhibiting police enforcement and
recommend changes
Consider NRSMP actions as they relate to East Java and
implement key crash risk reduction measures

79

Next steps
Discussion and feedback today
Finalise Report for East Java and WA
Recommend priority measures
East Java and WA to then consider next steps
and demonstration project locations
Seek funding

80

Discussion
Responses from:

key East Java government stakeholders

key National government stakeholders
key local government stakeholders
other stakeholders

About:
(1) Capacity Building
- management arrangements
- building knowledge
(2) priority interventions
(3) demonstration project concepts
(4) policy review priorities
(5) other
81

Initial road safety activity Road Safety

Management Capacity Review
East Java/ Western Australia Twinning Program

Province of East Java

Presentation by Eric Howard, Tri Tjahjono and Tony Bliss

19th March 2013, Surabaya

East Java/ Western Australia Twinning Program

Initial road safety activity Road Safety Management
Capacity Review

Province of East Java

Thank You
Presentation by Eric Howard, Tri Tjahjono and Tony Bliss
19th March 2013, Surabaya
83