24562 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
85 / Thursday, May 3, 2007 / Notices
Transportation Co., Ltd., Apiarist Co.,
Hangzhou Golden Harvest Health
Industry Co., Ltd., Shanghai Taiside
Trading Co., Ltd., Wuhan Bee Healthy
Co., Ltd., Wuhan Shino–Food Trade Co.,
Ltd., China Ocean Shipping Agency
Beijing, Rich Shipping Company, M&H
Shipping (Shanghai) Corporation,
United Logistics Group Inc., Beijing
World Trade Co., Ltd., Hangzhou
Golden Dragon Group Corporation Ltd.,
Kunshan Xinrui Co., Ltd., Qingdao
Aolan Trade Co., Ltd., Sichuan–
Dujiangyan Dubao Bee Industrial Co.,
Ltd., Eurasia Bee’s Products Co., Ltd.,
Anhui Honghui Foodstuff (Group) Co.,
Ltd., Jiangsu Kanghong Natural
Healthfoods Co., Ltd., and Tianjin Eulia
Honey Co., Ltd. Petitioners were the
only party to request a review of the
entries of subject merchandise exported
by these companies.
Partial Rescission
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative
review, in whole or in part, if a party
who requested the review withdraws
the request within ninety days of the
date of publication of notice of initiation
of the requested review.
Because the Petitioners’ withdrawal of
requests for review was timely and no
other party requested a review of the
aforementioned companies, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
we are rescinding this review with
respect to Cheng Du Wai Yuan Bee
Products Co., Ltd., Chiangmai
Healthyproduct Co., Ltd., Hangzhou
Xinsheng (or Xinyun) Shipping Agency
Co., Ltd., Shanghai Xinyun International
Transportation Co., Ltd., Apiarist Co.,
Hangzhou Golden Harvest Health
Industry Co., Ltd., Shanghai Taiside
Trading Co., Ltd., Wuhan Bee Healthy
Co., Ltd., Wuhan Shino–Food Trade Co.,
Ltd., China Ocean Shipping Agency
Beijing, Rich Shipping Company, M&H
Shipping (Shanghai) Corporation,
United Logistics Group Inc., Beijing
World Trade Co., Ltd., Hangzhou
Golden Dragon Group Corporation Ltd.,
Kunshan Xinrui Co., Ltd., Qingdao
Aolan Trade Co., Ltd., Sichuan–
Dujiangyan Dubao Bee Industrial Co.,
Ltd., Eurasia Bee’s Products Co., Ltd.,
Anhui Honghui Foodstuff (Group) Co.,
Ltd., Jiangsu Kanghong Natural
Healthfoods Co., Ltd., and Tianjin Eulia
Honey Co., Ltd.
Assessment Rates
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. For those
companies for which this review has
been rescinded and which have a
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:23 May 02, 2007 Jkt 211001
separate rate, antidumping duties shall
be assessed at rates equal to the cash
deposit of estimated antidumping duties
required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(2). The Department will
issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP within 15
days of publication of this notice. For
those companies for which this review
has been rescinded but do not have a
separate rate at this time (and thus
remain part of the PRC–wide entity), the
Department will issue assessment
instructions upon the completion of this
administrative review.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers for whom this review is
being rescinded, as of the publication
date of this notice, of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
Notification Regarding APOs
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: April 26, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–8479 Filed 5–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–201–817]
Oil Country Tubular Goods from
Mexico: Extension of Time Limits for
the Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 3, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Drury, or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0195, or (202)
482–3019, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 29, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published a notice of
initiation of an antidumping duty
administrative review for, oil country
tubular goods (OCTG) from Mexico for
the August 1, 2005, through July 31
2006, period of review (POR) covering
producers/exporters Hylsa, S.A. de C.V.
(Hylsa) and Tubos de Acero de Mexico,
S.A. (TAMSA). See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 71 FR 57465
(September 29, 2006). On November 1,
2006, TAMSA submitted a certification
that it had not shipped OCTG to the
United States during the POR and
requested that the Department rescind
the review with respect to TAMSA. See
Letter from TAMSA to the Department,
November 1, 2006.
On November 15, 2006, Hylsa
submitted a letter to the Department
stating that shares of Hylsa’s parent,
Hylsamex, had been acquired by a
company affiliated with TAMSA.
Accordingly, Hylsa and TAMSA had
common owners and were affiliated
during the POR. As a result, Hylsa
requested clarification from the
Department as to whether the
Department would require Hylsa to
submit TAMSA’s sales and/or cost
information for the POR. See Letter from
Hylsa to the Department, November 15,
2006. The Department issued a
supplemental questionnaire on February
16, 2007, requesting more information
on this issue. Hylsa submitted a
response on March 16, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM 03MYN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 85 / Thursday, May 3, 2007 / Notices
The preliminary results for this
administrative review are currently due
no later than May 3, 2007.
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
the Department to complete the
preliminary results of an administrative
review within 245 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of an order for
which a review is requested. However,
if it is not practicable to complete the
review within these time periods,
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows
the Department to extend the 245 day
time period for the preliminary results
to 365 days.
The Department has determined it is
not practicable to complete this review
within the statutory time limit because
additional time is required to determine
whether it will be necessary to request
sales and/or cost information from
TAMSA as part of the Department’s
review of sales by Hylsa during the
POR. Accordingly, the Department is
extending the time limits for completion
of the preliminary results of this
administrative review until no later than
August 31, 2007, which is 365 days
from the last day of the anniversary
month of this order. We intend to issue
the final results in this review no later
than 120 days after publication of the
preliminary results notice.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: April 27, 2007.
Stephen Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–8480 Filed 5–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–201–817
Oil Country Tubular Goods from
Mexico; Final Results of the Sunset
Review of Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 1, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated a sunset review
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
of the antidumping duty order on oil
country tubular goods (‘‘OCTG’’) from
Mexico. On the basis of the notice of
intent to participate, adequate
substantive responses, and rebuttal
comments filed on behalf of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:23 May 02, 2007 Jkt 211001
petitioners and respondent interested
parties, the Department conducted a full
sunset review of the antidumping duty
order pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(2)(i). As a
result of this sunset review, the
Department finds that revocation of the
antidumping duty order would likely
lead to the continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the levels listed below in
the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of
Review.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 3, 2007
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Drury or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20230;
telephone: 202–482–0195 or 202–482–
3019, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 1, 2006, the Department
published its notice of initiation of the
sunset review of the antidumping duty
order on OCTG from Mexico, in
accordance with section 751(c) of the
Act. See Initiation of Five-year
(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 71 FR 31153 (June
1, 2006) (‘‘Notice of Initiation’’).
The Department received notices of
intent to participate on behalf of United
States Steel Corporation and IPSCO
Tubulars Inc., Lone Star Steel Company,
Koppel Steel (NS Group), Maverick
Tube Corporation, Newport Steel (NS
Group) and V&M Star LP (collectively
‘‘petitioners’’), within the 15-day
deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). Petitioners claimed
interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of
a domestic–like product in the United
States.
The Department received complete
substantive responses to the notice of
initiation from the interested parties
Hylsa S.A. de CV (‘‘Hylsa’’) and Tubos
de Aceros de Mexico, S.A. (‘‘TAMSA’’)
(collectively ‘‘respondent interested
parties’’) within the 30-day deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).
The Department received rebuttal
responses from petitioners to the
substantive responses from the
respondent interested parties on July 5,
2006, and July 14, 2006, respectively.
Section 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(A)
provides that the Secretary normally
will conclude that respondent interested
parties have provided adequate
response to a notice of initiation where
the Department receives complete
substantive responses from respondent
PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
24563
interested parties accounting on average
for more than 50 percent, by volume, or
value, if appropriate, of the total exports
of the subject merchandise to the United
States over the five calendar years
preceding the year of publication of the
notice of initiation. On July 21, 2006,
the Department found that respondent
interested parties accounted for more
than 50 percent of exports by volume of
the subject merchandise from Mexico to
the United States. See Memorandum to
Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration,
from John K. Drury entitled, ‘‘Adequacy
Determination: Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Oil
Country Tubular Goods from Mexico,’’
(July 21, 2006). In accordance with 19
CFR 351.218(e)(2)(i), the Department
determined to conduct a full sunset
review of this antidumping duty order.
On September 25, 2006, in accordance
with section 751(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the
Department extended the deadlines for
the preliminary and final results of this
sunset review by 90 days. See Oil
Country Tubular Goods from Mexico;
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary and Final Results of Full
Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of
Antidumping Duty Order, 71 FR 55774.
The Department published the
preliminary results of this sunset review
on December 26, 2006. See Oil Country
Tubular Goods from Mexico;
Preliminary Results of the Sunset
Review of Antidumping Duty Order, 71
FR 77372 (December 26, 2006). In the
Preliminary Results, the Department
found that revocation of the order
would likely result in continuation or
recurrence of dumping with net margins
of 21.70 percent for TAMSA and ‘‘all
others,’’ and 0.62 percent for Hylsa.
On February 14, 2007, within the
deadline specified in 19 CFR
§ 351.309(c)(1)(i), the Department
received case briefs on behalf of both
TAMSA and Hylsa. On February 20,
2007, the Department rejected the case
brief on behalf of Hylsa under 19 CFR
§ 351.302(d), as the Department
determined that the brief contained new
factual information submitted
subsequent to the deadline for new
factual information as proscribed in 19
CFR § 351.301(b)(3). The Department
requested that Hylsa re–file the case
brief no later than February 22, 2007,
and extended the deadline for rebuttal
briefs to February 28, 2007. On February
20, 2007, the Department received a
rebuttal brief on behalf of petitioner
IPSCO. On February 22, 2007, the
Department received the corrected case
brief on behalf of Hylsa. On February
28, the Department received rebuttal
briefs on behalf of petitioner U.S. Steel.
03MYN1