Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

78 / Tuesday April 24, 2007 / Notices 20365

cooperation with the Pine Ridge Oglala officials, or organizations or businesses Environmental Impact Statement for the
Sioux, is preparing an Environmental available for public inspection in their Grand Teton Transportation Plan, Grand
Impact Statement (EIS) for a General entirety. Teton National Park.
Management Plan (GMP) for the South FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Unit of Badlands National Park. The Superintendent Paige Baker, Badlands SUMMARY: Pursuant to § 102(2)(C) of the
GMP will prescribe the resource National Park, 25216 Ben Reifel Road, National Environmental Policy Act of
conditions and visitor experiences that Interior, South Dakota 57750, telephone 1969, 83 Stat. 852, 853, codified as
are to be achieved and maintained in 605–433–5280. amended at 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the
the South Unit over the next 15 to 20 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Composed National Park Service announces the
years. of two largely undeveloped and remote availability of the Record of Decision for
To facilitate sound planning and tracts of land totaling 140,000 acres, the the Grand Teton Transportation Plan,
environmental assessment, the NPS South Unit lies entirely within the Pine Grand Teton National Park, WY. On
intends to gather information necessary Ridge Oglala Sioux Reservation. The March 12, 2007, the Director,
for the preparation of the EIS and obtain South Unit is administered to provide Intermountain Region approved the
suggestions and information from other for the care, maintenance, and Record of Decision for the project. As
agencies and the public on the scope of preservation of prehistoric, historic, soon as practicable, the National Park
issues to be addressed in the EIS. scientific, and scenic interest, and to Service will begin to implement the
Comments and participation in this develop facilities that will provide for Preferred Alternative contained in the
scoping process are invited. public use and enjoyment. FEIS issued on September 15, 2006. The
Participation in the planning process As stated above, the GMP will following course of action will occur
will be encouraged and facilitated by prescribe the resource conditions and under the preferred alternative:
various means, including newsletters visitor experiences that are to be construction of approximately 23 miles
and open houses or meetings. The NPS achieved and maintained in the South of separated multi-use pathways
will conduct public scoping meetings to Unit over the next 15 to 20 years. The between the south park boundary and
explain the planning process and to clarification of what must be achieved String Lake via North Jenny Lake
solicit opinion about issues to address according to law and policy will be Junction; approximately 16 miles of
in the GMP/EIS. based on review of the unit’s purpose, pathways within the road corridor
Notification of all such meetings will significance, special mandates, and the between North Jenny Lake Junction and
be announced in the local press and in body of laws and policies directing park Colter Bay; an approximately 3-mile
the NPS newsletters. management. Based on determinations pathway within the road corridor along
ADDRESSES: Additionally, if you wish to of desired conditions, the GMP will the Moose-Wilson Road from the
comment on any issues associated with outline the kinds of resource Granite Canyon Entrance to the
GMP, you may submit your comments management activities, visitor activities, Laurance S. Rockefeller (LSR) Preserve;
by any one of several methods. You may and appropriate future development. A and realignment of the Moose-Wilson
mail or hand-deliver comments to range of reasonable management Road in two areas, with the existing
Superintendent, Badlands National alternatives will be developed through alignments being restored to natural
Park, 25216 Ben Reifel Road, Interior, this planning process and will include, conditions. This course of action was
South Dakota 57740. You may provide at minimum, a no-action alternative and analyzed in the Final Environmental
comments electronically by entering a preferred alternative. To facilitate Impact Statement and combines two
them into the NPS’s Planning, sound analysis of environmental alternatives presented in the Draft
Environment and Public Comment Web impacts, the NPS is gathering Environmental Impact Statement. Four
site http://parkplanning.nps.gov. information necessary for the other alternatives were analyzed in the
Information will be available for public preparation of an associated EIS. Draft and Final Environmental Impact
review and comment from the Office of A GMP for the North Unit was Statements. The full range of foreseeable
the Superintendent at the above completed in 2006; the South Unit GMP environmental consequences was
address. will be the equivalent of Volume 2. assessed, and appropriate mitigating
Requests to be added to the project Together, the two volumes will measures were identified.
mailing list should be sent to Ms. constitute the GMP for Badlands The Record of Decision includes a
Pamela Livermont, Badlands National National Park. statement of the decision made,
Park, 25216 Ben Reifel Road, Interior, Dated: January 29, 2007. synopses of other alternatives
South Dakota 57750; telephone 605– considered, the basis for the decision, a
Ernest Quintana,
433–5281; or e-mail description of the environmentally
Pamela_Livermont@nps.gov. Regional Director, Midwest Region.
preferable alternative, a finding on
Before including your address, [FR Doc. 07–2020 Filed 4–23–07; 8:45 am] impairment of park resources and
telephone number, e-mail address, or BILLING CODE 4312–AD–M values, a listing of measures to
other personal identifying information minimize environmental harm, and an
in your comments, you should be aware overview of public involvement in the
that your entire comment (including DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR decision-making process.
your personal identifying information) National Park Service FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
may be made publicly available at any
Mary Gibson Scott, Superintendent,
time. While you can ask us in your Grand Teton Transportation Plan, Final Grand Teton National Park, P.O. Drawer
comment to withhold your personal Environmental Impact Statement, 170, Moose, Wyoming 83012–0170,
identifying information from public Grand Teton National Park, WY (307) 739–3410.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

review, we cannot guarantee that we


will be able to do so. We will make all AGENCY: National Park Service, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of
submissions from organizations or Department of the Interior. the Record of Decision may be obtained
businesses, from individuals identifying ACTION: Notice of availability of a from the contact listed above or online
themselves as representatives or Record of Decision on the Final at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/grte.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:32 Apr 23, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM 24APN1
20366 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 78 / Tuesday April 24, 2007 / Notices

Dated: March 12, 2007. Scenic River, P.O. Box 591, O’Neill, appropriate mitigating measures were
Anthony J. Schetzsle, Nebraska 68763, or by calling 402–336– identified.
Deputy Director, Intermountain Region, 3970. Copies of the final EIS and ROD The Record of Decision includes a
National Park Service. are available upon request from the statement of the decision made,
[FR Doc. E7–7739 Filed 4–23–07; 8:45 am] above address or may be viewed online synopses of other alternatives
BILLING CODE 4312–CX–P at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/. considered, the basis for the decision, a
Dated: March 29, 2007. description of the environmentally
Ernest Quintana,
preferable alternative, a listing of
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR measures to minimize environmental
Regional Director, Midwest Region.
harm, and an overview of public
National Park Service [FR Doc. E7–7745 Filed 4–23–07; 8:45 am] involvement in the decision-making
BILLING CODE 4312–BM–P process.
Notice of Availability for the Record of
Decision on the Final Environmental FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Impact Statement for the Niobrara DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Ralph E. Becker, The Shipley Group and
National Scenic River General Bear West, 1584 South 500 West, Suite
Management Plan, Nebraska National Park Service 201, Woods Cross, Utah 84010; phone
801–355–8816; e-mail to
AGENCY: National Park Service, Construction of New Utah Museum of rbecker@bearwest.com.
Department of the Interior. Natural History, Final Environmental
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) Impact Statement, Salt Lake County, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of
of the National Environmental Policy UT the Record of Decision may be obtained
Act of 1969, the National Park Service from the contact listed above or online
(NPS) announces the availability of the AGENCY:National Park Service, at http://www.umnh.utah.edu.
Record of Decision (ROD) Niobrara Department of the Interior. Dated: March 26, 2007.
National Scenic River (Scenic River) ACTION: Notice of Availability of a Anthony J. Schetzsle,
General Management Plan/final Record of Decision on the Final Deputy Director, Intermountain Region,
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Environmental Impact Statement for the National Park Service.
Scenic River. On March 26, the Midwest Construction and Operation of a [FR Doc. E7–7742 Filed 4–23–07; 8:45 am]
Regional Director approved the ROD for Proposed New Utah Museum of Natural BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
the project. As soon as practicable, the History at the University of Utah.
NPS will begin to implement the
Preferred Alternative contained in the SUMMARY: Pursuant to § 102(2)(C) of the DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
final EIS issued on February 23. National Environmental Policy Act of
Management Alternative B develops a 1969, 83 Stat. 852, 853, codified as Employment and Training
vision for cooperative management of amended at 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the Administration
the Scenic River, with the NPS National Park Service and the
providing stewardship directly and University of Utah announce the [TA–W–60,882]
through Federal, State, and local availability of the Record of Decision for
partners on a landscape that would Camaco, LLC; Mariana Division,
the Construction and Operation of a Marianna, AR; Notice of Negative
remain largely in private ownership. Proposed New Utah Museum of Natural
The alternative’s boundary protects, as Determination Regarding Application
History at the University of Utah, Salt for Reconsideration
equitably as possible, the river’s Lake County, Utah. On March 26, 2007,
outstandingly remarkable scenic, the Director, Intermountain Region By application dated April 4, 2007, a
recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, approved the Record of Decision for the company official requested
and paleontological values. This project. As soon as practicable, the administrative reconsideration of the
alternative encompasses 23,074 acres University of Utah will begin to Department’s negative determination
and is within the acreage limitations of implement the Preferred Alternative regarding eligibility for workers and
the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. contained in the FEIS issued on former workers of the subject firm to
This course of action and three February 23, 2007. The following course apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
alternatives were analyzed in the draft of action will occur under the preferred (TAA) and Alternative Trade
and the final EIS. The full range of alternative: the new museum building Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The
foreseeable environmental will be built uphill from the pipeline denial notice was signed on March 16,
consequences was assessed and corridor/Bonneville Shoreline Trail that 2007 and published in the Federal
appropriate mitigating measures were pass through the new site. Parking will Register on March 30, 2007 (72 FR
identified. be provided in a joint Red Butte Garden 15168).
The ROD includes a statement of the and Arboretum/Utah Museum of Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
decision made, synopses of other Natural History facility, or if a joint reconsideration may be granted under
alternatives considered, the basis for the facility is not viable, downhill from the the following circumstances:
decision, a description of the pipeline corridor. Flexibility is afforded (1) If it appears on the basis of facts
environmentally preferable alternative, for site design and placement of not previously considered that the
a finding on impairment of park facilities. A portion of the development determination complained of was
resources and values, a listing of area extends into Red Butte Garden and erroneous;
measures to minimize environmental Arboretum property. This course of (2) If it appears that the determination
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

harm, and an overview of public action and five alternatives were complained of was based on a mistake
involvement in the decisionmaking analyzed in the Draft and Final in the determination of facts not
process. Environmental Impact Statements. The previously considered; or
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: full range of foreseeable environmental (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Superintendent, Niobrara National consequences was assessed, and Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:32 Apr 23, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM 24APN1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen