Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
I. I NTRODUCTION
0093-9994 2013 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
SHIRABE et al.: EFFICIENCY COMPARISON BETWEEN Si-IGBT-BASED DRIVE AND GaN-BASED DRIVE
567
A. Turn-On Characteristics
The circuit used for studying the switching characteristics of
the GaN module is shown in Fig. 2.
From Fig. 1, it is clear that the turn-on and turn-off characteristics of the hybrid HEMT module are influenced by the
characteristics of the series Si-based MOSFET switch that is
used as a cascode switch. This MOSFET is rated for 30 V,
11 A at a case temperature of 70 deg. C. The total switch charge
to turn on the MOSFET is 4.2 nC. The turn-on delay time is
8.2 ns and the rise time is only 11 ns, yielding an excellent
turn-on characteristics. Turn-on waveform is shown in Fig. 3.
568
requires movement through a resistive channel which is responsible for power loss. Also, during turn-on process, this charge
needs to be replaced with electrons to establish a conducting
channel. The extra charge concentration will require extra
power and more time to remove this charge, which increases
turn-off delay time and increases turn-off gate drive power.
Hence, an optimal solution will be to simply apply zero volts so
that the gate-source junction is shorted with the gate resistance
in the circuit. Sometimes, if the trace between the gate driver
board and the GaN HEMT device is unavoidably long, then
one may consider applying a low negative voltage to quickly
discharge the parasitic capacitance of the trace. In the testing
done here, no negative gate voltage was applied. The turn-off
characteristics are shown in Fig. 4.
From Fig. 4, it is observed that the turn-off time is about
15 ns. This is much faster than that achievable using a standard
Si-based IGBT with similar voltage and current rating. The best
achievable turn-off time for CP30TD1-12 per the manufacturer
is about 300 ns, with enough negative gate drive. The reason
can be attributed to the fact that unlike MOSFETs, the IGBT
has an additional junction, which contributes to tail current
during turn-off process. This is instrumental in the slower turnoff characteristics observed in IGBTs compared to MOSFETs.
The additional junction also causes parasitic latch up problems
as described in [8]. In order to overcome this latch-up problem,
it is advisable to provide negative gate voltage in case of IGBTs
[8]. In Fig. 4, the turn-off delay is measured to be 10 ns and
the turn-off fall rise time is measured to be 7 ns. The turn-off
v/t is seen to be about 53 kV/s.
C. No Free Wheeling Diode in GaN HEMT
It is important to point out that the basic high voltage GaNbased HEMT device is a bidirectional module with high voltage
blocking characteristics when VDS > 0. The actual conducting
part of the HEMT device is a channel of pure electron flow
in a crystalline structure with no junctions. Hence, current can
flow in either direction. Hence, when the source voltage is
more positive with respect to the drain terminal, then current
can flow in the reverse direction quite efficiently. The current
in the cascode MOSFET flows through the body diode of the
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6. (a) Schematic of an output LC filter for PWM filtering; (b) Transfer
function of the LC output filter with a load. Red. fc = 3 kHz and fr = 827 Hz;
Brown. fc = 100 kHz and fr = 25 kHz.
MOSFET, which has quite good intrinsic turn-on and turnoff characteristics. Since the cascode switch is a low-voltage
switch, it has a short drift region with little charge holding
capacity. This significantly reduces the reverse recovery charge,
Qrr and makes it fast to turn off with little power loss. The body
diode of the MOSFET used in the GaN HEMT module here has
a forward drop of only 1 V and has a typical reverse recovery
time of 14 ns. The reverse recover charge stored when the
body diode gets reverse biased (Qrr ) is typically about 40 nC
at 400 V, making it to turn on and turn off very fast with
little power loss. Typical values of reverse recovery current
for comparably rated Si IGBT are 200 ns with a Qrr value of
approximately 900 nC. This is one of the reasons why a Si
IGBT cannot be switched at 100 s of kHz.
Since, there is physically no body diode across the GaN
HEMT device, it has low losses during turn off and is well
suited for inverter application in an H-bridge configuration. It
should be pointed out here that the GaN device characteristic
does not show the device current. This is because any current
SHIRABE et al.: EFFICIENCY COMPARISON BETWEEN Si-IGBT-BASED DRIVE AND GaN-BASED DRIVE
Fig. 7.
569
measuring method would add inductance disrupting the operation integrity during such high speed operation.
Traditionally current and voltage waveforms of the switching
semiconductor are measured and switching losses are calculated through mathematical integration. However, with GaN,
the switching speed is 1050 times faster. Hence, as mentioned
earlier, insertion of a current probe causes unwanted inductance, disrupting the operation integrity and leading to unsafe
spikes. Due to this reason, the only effective way to characterized loss is extracted by efficiency tests of dc-dc converter at
various current and frequencies. Switching loss characteristic
of the module used here is experimentally obtained using the
circuit of Fig. 2 and is reported here in Fig. 5.
III. O UTPUT S INE WAVE F ILTER C HARACTERISTICS
As mentioned in the Introduction section, traditionally PWM
waveforms are applied across ac motor terminals to operate
them at variable speed to achieve desired performance. However, ac motors respond to only the fundamental components
and the harmonics associated with PWM wave form manifest
themselves as loss in electric motors. This reduces the overall
system efficiency. One way around this is to filter the PWM
waveform using output sine wave filters but as mentioned earlier, a significant part of the loss in the motor is simply moved to
the filter thereby not affecting the overall system efficiency to a
great extent. When the processed power is large, the switching
frequency is low which makes the filter bulky and expensive.
Given the fact that high speed switches that can process large
amounts of power are in near sight, it is conceivable that the sine
wave filters can be designed to have a higher corner frequency,
thereby reducing their size and improving the filter efficiency
since filtering very high frequency components can be achieved
using soft magnetic material that are characterized by low core
losses. In other words, making use of power switches that can
be efficiently switched at higher switching frequency, one could
design small sized, more efficient output sine wave filters. The
combination of efficient power switches, small sized low loss
sine wave filter can yield drive systems that are more efficient
than the drive systems that are presently in use.
Fig. 8. Photograph of GaN module and inverter with the GaN module. Sample
shown was used for the test. Electrical specifications: VLL (output) = 230 V,
Output current Io = 14 A, 6-in-1 module.
1
.
2 LF CF
(1)
570
Fig. 9. Schematic of the test setup for the Si-based drive operating with a carrier frequency of 15 kHz.
SHIRABE et al.: EFFICIENCY COMPARISON BETWEEN Si-IGBT-BASED DRIVE AND GaN-BASED DRIVE
571
TABLE I
M EASURED E FFICIENCY FOR GaN-BASED D RIVE
TABLE II
M EASURED E FFICIENCY FOR Si-IGBT D RIVE
Fig. 10. (a) Efficiency of inverter with respect to output electrical power (without motor efficiency). (b) System efficiency (mechanical output power to electrical
input power) as a function of mechanical output power.
572
seen in Fig. 7. The loss in the sine wave filter is much lower than
the extra losses seen in the ac motor when no filter was used.
The system tested here is rated for 2.0 kW. However, the basic
idea that GaN-based drive yields a better system efficiency
compared to Si-IGBT-based drive holds true for larger power
ratings as well. The absence of audible PWM noise in the motor
and in the output sine wave filter was noticeable.
R EFERENCES
[1] M. Ishida, Y. Uemoto, T. Ueda, T. Tanaka, and D. Ueda, GaN Switching
power devices, in Proc. Int. Power Electron. Conf., 2010, pp. 10141017.
[2] T. Morita, S. Tamura, Y. Anda, M. Ishida, Y. Uemoto, T. Ueda, T. Tanaka,
and D. Ueda, 99.3% efficiency of three-phase inverter for motor drive
using GaN-based gate injection transistors, in Proc. Int. Power Electron.
Conf., 2011, pp. 481484.
[3] M. J. Melfi, Quantifying the energy efficiency of motors on inverters,
IEEE Ind. Appl. Mag., pp. 3743, Nov./Dec. 2011.
[4] Induction Motors Fed by PWM Frequency Inverters, WEG Motors,
Technical Guide, Publication 028, Dec. 2009. [Online]. Available: www.
weg.net
[5] A. Boglietti, A. Cavagnino, and A. M. Knight, Isolating the impact of
PWM modulation on motor iron losses, in Conf. Rec. IEEE IAS Annu.
Meeting, 2008, pp. 17.
[6] D. M. Ionel, M. Popescu, M. I. McGilp, T. J. E. Miller, S. J. Dellinger, and
R. J. Heideman, Computation of core losses in electrical machines using
improved models for laminated steel, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 43,
no. 6, pp. 15541564, Nov./Dec. 2007.
[7] A. Boglietti, A. Cavagnino, and M. Lazzari, Fast method for the iron
loss prediction in inverter-fed induction motors, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl.,
vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 806811, Mar./Apr. 2010.
[8] C. J. Melhourne and L. Tang, Transient effects of PWM drives on induction motors, in Conf. Rec. IEEE IAS Annu. Meeting, 1995, pp. 5965.
[9] M. M. Swamy, T. Kume, and N. Takada, An efficient resonant gate-drive
scheme for high-frequency applications, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 48,
no. 4, pp. 14181431, Jul./Aug. 2012.
[10] G. Deboy, N. Marz, J. P. Stengl, H. Strack, J. Tihanyi, and H. Weber, A
new generation of high voltage MOSFETs breaks the limit line of silicon,
in Proc. IEDM., 1998, pp. 683685.
[11] D. Christen, U. Badstuebner, J. Biela, and J. W. Kolar, Calorimetric
power loss measurement for highly efficient converters, in Proc. Int.
Power Electron. Conf., 2010, pp. 14381445.