Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

57 / Monday, March 26, 2007 / Notices 14103

our intent to permit organizations to decisions. Protocols for this research SUMMARY: The Council on
expand these time limitations by having were reviewed by the Board at its June Environmental Quality (CEQ) used an
numerous individuals sign up and October 2006 meetings. interagency work group to develop a
separately to speak on their behalf. If • A proposal for a new field study of handbook to help NEPA practitioners
additional time is available, there may the effectiveness of products containing improve the effectiveness of their NEPA
be flexibility in time for public oil of lemon eucalyptus in repelling processes through collaboration. The
comments. Each speaker should bring mosquitoes. handbook focuses on collaboration in
25 copies of his or her comments and • Completed studies of human skin the context of the NEPA process,
presentation slides for distribution to irritation and skin sensitization on two outlines general principles, presents
the HSRB at the meeting. pending pesticide products whose use useful steps, and provides information
b. Written comments. Although you would involve extensive dermal on methods of collaboration. CEQ
may submit written comments at any exposure. These studies were conducted invites comments on the proposed
time, for the HSRB to have the best before the effective date of EPA’s human handbook, ‘‘Collaboration in NEPA—A
opportunity to review and consider your studies rules (April 7, 2006). Handbook for NEPA Practitioners,’’ that
comments as it deliberates on its report, • EPA’s assessment of the need for is available from CEQ directly or at
you should submit your comments at new research on the exposure received http://www.NEPA.gov in the Current
least five business days prior to the by occupational handlers who mix, Developments section.
beginning of the meeting. If you submit load, or apply agricultural or DATES: Written comments should be
comments after this date, those antimicrobial pesticides. submitted on or before May 4, 2007.
comments will be provided to the Board • An EPA ‘‘draft framework’’ ADDRESSES: Copies of the proposed
members, but you should recognize that concerning best practices for recruiting handbook can be requested from CEQ.
the Board members may not have and enrolling subjects in studies of Electronic comments on the proposed
adequate time to consider those occupational exposure. handbook and requests for a copy of the
comments prior to making a decision. In addition, at the Board’s request, proposed handbook can be sent to
Thus, if you plan to submit written EPA will present its interpretation and horst_greczmiel@ceq.eop.gov with the
comments, the Agency strongly application of the standard in 40 CFR subject line reading ‘‘NEPA
encourages you to submit such 26.1705: ‘‘EPA shall not rely on data Modernization (Collaboration).’’ Fax
comments no later than noon, Eastern from any research initiated after April 7, written comments and requests to (202)
Standard Time, April 11, 2007. You 2006, unless EPA has adequate 456–0753 with the subject line reading
should submit your comments using the information to determine that the ‘‘NEPA Modernization (Collaboration).’’
instructions in Unit I.C. of this notice. research was conducted in substantial Electronic or facsimile comments or
In addition, the Agency also requests compliance with [EPA’s human studies requests are preferred because Federal
that person(s) submitting comments rules].’’ Finally, the Board may also offices experience intermittent mail
directly to the docket also provide a discuss planning for future HSRB delays caused by security screening.
copy of their comments to the person meetings. Written comments and requests may
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION B. Meeting Minutes and Reports also be submitted to ‘‘NEPA
CONTACT. There is no limit on the length Modernization (Collaboration), Attn:
Minutes of the meeting, summarizing
of written comments for consideration Associate Director for NEPA Oversight,
the matters discussed and
by the HSRB. 722 Jackson Place, NW., Washington,
recommendations, if any, made by the
E. Background advisory committee regarding such DC 20503.’’
matters will be released within 90 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
A. Topics for Discussion Horst Greczmiel, 202–395–5750.
calendar days of the meeting. Such
The HSRB is a Federal advisory minutes will be available at http:// SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
committee operating in accordance with www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/ and http:// Council on Environmental Quality
the Federal Advisory Committee Act www.regulations.gov In addition, (CEQ) established a National
(FACA) 5 U.S.C. app.2 section 9. The information concerning a Board meeting Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Task
HSRB provides advice, information, and report, if applicable, can be found at Force and is now implementing
recommendations to EPA on issues http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/ or from recommendations designed to
related to scientific and ethical aspects the person listed under FOR FURTHER modernize the implementation of NEPA
of human subjects research. The major INFORMATION CONTACT. and make the NEPA process more
objectives of the HSRB are to provide Dated: March 19, 2007.
effective and efficient. Additional
advice and recommendations on: (a) information is available on the task
George M. Gray,
Research proposals and protocols; (b) force Web site at http://ceq.eh.doe.gov/
reports of completed research with Science Advisor. ntf.
human subjects; and (c) how to [FR Doc. E7–5492 Filed 3–23–07; 8:45 am] The proposed handbook,
strengthen EPA’s programs for BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ‘‘Collaboration in NEPA—A Handbook
protection of human subjects of for NEPA Practitioners,’’ was developed
research. The HSRB reports to the EPA to assist those responsible for
Administrator through EPA’s Science COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL conducting National Environmental
Advisor. QUALITY Policy Act (NEPA) analyses in
At the April 2007 meeting of the expanding the effective use of
HSRB, EPA will present for HSRB The National Environmental Policy collaboration as part of the NEPA
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

review: Act—Collaboration Handbook process. Collaboration is defined for


• The results of two completed insect AGENCY: Council On Environmental purposes of the handbook as seeking
repellent efficacy studies on an aerosol Quality. agreements at one or more stages of the
formulation of the active ingredient NEPA process by cultivating shared
ACTION: Notice and request for
IR3535, studies which the Agency vision, trust, and communication. The
comments.
intends to rely in making registration main goal of the handbook is to

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:30 Mar 23, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM 26MRN1
14104 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 57 / Monday, March 26, 2007 / Notices

encourage collaboration by providing (Telephone: (202) 523–5800), other surety in a form and amount
examples and case studies that show jgregory@fmc.gov. determined by the Commission to
how agencies have collaborated with SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ensure financial responsibility. The
other agencies and interested parties in Commission has implemented the
the past and how agencies can better Request for Comments provisions of section 19 in regulations
collaborate throughout a NEPA process. The Federal Maritime Commission, as contained in 46 CFR 515, including
The handbook describes the context part of its continuing effort to reduce financial responsibility forms FMC–48,
for when collaboration works well, paperwork and respondent burden, FMC–67, FMC–68, and FMC–69,
provides a basic approach to designing invites the general public and other Optional Rider Forms FMC–48A and
a collaborative NEPA process, examines Federal agencies to comment on the FMC–69A, and its related license
the various opportunities for continuing information collection listed application form, FMC–18.
collaboration throughout the NEPA Current Actions: There are no changes
in this notice, as required by the
process, and addresses challenges to to this information collection, and it is
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
collaboration during the NEPA process. being submitted for extension purposes
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
In addition to examples of strategies for only.
Comments submitted in response to Type of Review: Extension.
preventing conflict, the handbook this notice will be included or
provides examples of Memoranda of Needs and Uses: The Commission
summarized in our request for Office of uses information obtained under this
Understanding, case studies, and Management and Budget approval of the
resources for practitioners. part and through Form FMC–18 to
relevant information collection. All determine the qualifications of OTIs and
Public comments to the proposed comments are part of the public record
handbook are requested by May 4, 2007. their compliance with shipping statutes
and subject to disclosure. Please do not and regulations and to enable the
March 19, 2007. include any confidential or Commission to discharge its duties
James L. Connaughton, inappropriate material in your under the Act by ensuring that OTIs
Chairman, Council on Environmental comments. We invite comments on: (1) maintain acceptable evidence of
Quality. The necessity and utility of the financial responsibility. If the collection
[FR Doc. E7–5454 Filed 3–23–07; 8:45 am] proposed information collection for the of information were not conducted,
BILLING CODE 3125–W7–P proper performance of the agency’s there would be no basis upon which the
functions; (2) the accuracy of the Commission could determine if
estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance applicants are qualified for licensing.
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION the quality, utility, and clarity of the Frequency: This information is
information to be collected; and (4) the collected when applicants apply for a
Agency Information Collection use of automated collection techniques license or when existing licensees
Activities: Proposed Collection; or other forms of information change certain information in their
Comment Request technology to minimize the information application forms.
collection burden. An automated form Type of Respondents: The types of
AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission for the license application, FMC–18, is respondents are persons desiring to
(FMC). currently in development. A rule will be obtain a license to act as an OTI. Under
ACTION: Notice and request for published as soon as the automated the Act, OTIs may be either an ocean
comments. form is available, for use at the option freight forwarder, a non-vessel-operating
of the applicant. common carrier, or both.
SUMMARY: As part of our continuing
Number of Annual Respondents: The
effort to reduce paperwork and Information Collection Open for Commission estimates a potential
respondent burden, and as required by Comment annual respondent universe of 4,765
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Title: 46 CFR 515—Licensing, entities.
the Federal Maritime Commission Financial Responsibility Requirements Estimated Time Per Response: The
invites comments on the continuing and General Duties for Ocean time per response for completing
information collection (extension with Transportation Intermediaries and Application Form FMC–18 averages 2
no changes) listed below in this notice. Related Forms. hours. The time to complete a financial
DATES: Comments must be submitted on OMB Approval Number: 3072–0018 responsibility form averages 20 minutes.
or before May 25, 2007. (Expires July 31, 2007). Total Annual Burden: The
ADDRESSES: You may send comments to: Abstract: Section 19 of the Shipping Commission estimates the total annual
Derek O. Scarbrough, Chief Information Act of 1984 (the ‘‘Act’’), 46 U.S.C. person-hour burden at 3,595 person-
Officer, Office of Administration, 40101–41309 (2006), as modified by hours.
Federal Maritime Commission, 800 Pub. L. 105–258 (The Ocean Shipping Bryant L. VanBrakle,
North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, Reform Act of 1998) and Section 424 of
DC 20573, (Telephone: (202) 523–5800), Secretary.
Pub. L. 105–383 (The Coast Guard
cio@fmc.gov. Please reference the [FR Doc. E7–5483 Filed 3–23–07; 8:45 am]
Authorization Act of 1998), provides
information collection’s title and OMB that no person in the United States may BILLING CODE 6730–01–P

number in your comments. act as an ocean transportation


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To intermediary (OTI) unless that person
obtain additional information, copies of holds a license issued by the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
the information collection and Commission. The Commission shall
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Agency Information Collection


instructions, or copies of any comments issue an OTI license to any person that
Activities: Announcement of Board
received, contact Jane Gregory, the Commission determines to be
Approval Under Delegated Authority
Management Analyst, Office of qualified by experience and character to
and Submission to OMB
Administration, Federal Maritime act as an OTI. Further, no person may
Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, act as an OTI unless that person AGENCY: Board of Governors of the
NW., Washington, DC 20573, furnishes a bond, proof of insurance or Federal Reserve System

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:30 Mar 23, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM 26MRN1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen