Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Jan G. Johansson
ABB Utilities AB
Abstract
Voltage Source Converter (VSC)
technology has been selected as the basis for several
recent projects due to its controllability, compact
modular design, ease of system interface and low
environmental impact.
This paper describes the
rationale for selection of VSC technology and the latest
technical developments utilized in several recent
projects.
Keywords VSC - HVDC IGBT - Valves PWM FACTS - STATCOM SVC Flicker Power Quality
1.
INTRODUCTION
Bo A. Nilsson
ABB Utilities AB
Figure 1. STATCOM
One of the main reasons for installing an SVC or
STATCOM in transmission networks is to increase the
power transfer capability where limited by post-contingency
voltage criteria or undervoltage loss of load probability.
Determining the optimum mix of dynamic and switched
compensation is a challenge. Control systems are designed
to keep the normal operating point within the middle of the
SVC or STATCOM dynamic range.
If, after a disturbance, the FACTS device temporarily hits its
capacitive limit, reactive power production will be
decreased. For an SVC this decrease will be with voltage
squared, whereas with a STATCOM it will be with voltage.
Most overhead transmission voltage support applications
require more dynamic capability on the capacitive side than
on the inductive side. It is more economical to do this with
System
Current
Source
Conventional
HVDC
transmission employs
linecommutated, current-source converters requiring a
synchronous voltage source in order to operate. The
conversion process demands reactive power from filters,
shunt banks, or series capacitors which are part of the
converter station. Any surplus or deficit in reactive power
must be accommodated by the ac system. This difference in
reactive power needs to be kept within a given band to keep
the ac voltage within the desired tolerance. The weaker the
system or the further away from generation, the tighter the
reactive power exchange must be to stay within the desired
voltage tolerance.
1.150
1.100
Voltage (p.u.)
With 20 MVAR HF
1.050
1.000
0.950
0.900
0.850
-3.000
1.150
Voltage (p.u.)
1.100
-2.000
-1.000
0.000
1.000
2.000
Characteristic
1.050
1.000
0.950
0.900
0.850
-3.000
-2.000
-1.000
0.000
1.000
2.000
Phase
Reactor
AC bus
AC filters
DC Capacitor
Control
System
The active power control loop can be set to control either the
active power or the DC side voltage. In a DC link, one
station will be selected to control the active power while the
other must be set to control the DC side voltage. The
reactive power control loop can be set to control either the
reactive power or the AC side voltage. Either of these two
modes can be selected independently at either end of the DC
link.
u DC2
u DC1
uAC-ref1
uAC1
i
u
uDC-ref1DC-ref2
uAC2 uAC-ref2
+
AC
voltage
control
qref1
PWM
internal
current
control
AC
voltage
control
+
DC
voltage
control
DC
voltage
control
ref1 pref2
PWM
internal
current
control
Uac Uv
sin( )
P =
X
X
Figure 6. Control of VSC-Based Transmission System
ref2
3.
Rating
3 MW, 10 kV
10 km
0-44 MVAR
50 MW, 80 kV
70 km underground
Hagfors
Gotland
Tjreborg
7 MW, 10 kV
4 km underground
Directlink
3 x 60 MW, 80 kV
65 km underground
Moselstahlwerk
Eagle Pass
0-38 MVAR
36 MVA
Cross
Sound
Cable Intercon.
Murray Link
Polarit
Evron
0-164 MVAR
0-36 MVAR
Troll A
2 x 40 MW, 60 kV
70 km submarine
Holly
-80/+100 MVAR
VSC Rationale
Development
EAF flicker mitigation
- Wind power
- Environmental
- Voltage support
- Stabilize AC lines
- Wind power testing
- Variable frequency
- Voltage support
- Asynchronous Tie
- Weak systems
- Environmental
- Permitting
EAF flicker mitigation
- Weak system
- Voltage support
- Asynchronous Tie
- Black start
- Controllability
- System interface
- Asynchronous Tie
- Weak systems
- Environmental
- Permitting
EAF flicker mitigation
- Load balancing
- Active filtering
- Offshore platform
- Var. speed drive
- Environmental
- Black start
- Voltage support
- Retired generator
- Cap bank control
- Small site
of
HVDC
Light
4.
CONCLUSION
5.
REFERENCES