Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Notices 10557
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (‘‘EDIS’’) at http://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—In October 2004, the
Commission determined that there was
no reasonable indication that a U.S.
industry was materially injured or
threatened with material injury by
reason of imports of certain polyvinyl
alcohol from Taiwan that were allegedly
sold in the United States at less than fair
value. The Commission’s determination
was appealed to the CIT. The CIT issued
an opinion in the matter on January 29,
2007. Celanese Chemicals, Ltd. v.
United States, Slip Op. 07–16 (Ct. Int’l
Trade Jan. 29, 2007). In its opinion, the
CIT remanded the matter to the
Commission for further proceedings not
inconsistent with that opinion.
Participation in the proceeding.—
Only those persons who were interested
parties to the original investigation (i.e.,
persons listed on the Commission
Secretary’s service list) and were parties
to the appeal may participate in the
remand proceeding. Such persons need
not make any additional filings with the
Commission to participate in the
remand proceeding. Business
proprietary information (‘‘BPI’’) referred
to during the remand proceeding will be
governed, as appropriate, by the
administrative protective order issued
in the original investigation.
Written submissions.—The
Commission is not reopening the record
in this proceeding for submission of
new factual information. The
Commission will, however, permit the
parties to file comments solely
pertaining to the inquiries that are the
subject of the CIT’s remand instructions.
Comments should be limited to no more
than twenty (20) double-spaced and
single-sided pages of textual material.
The parties may not submit any new
factual information and may not address
any issue other than the inquiries that
are the subject of the CIT’s remand
instructions. Any such comments must
be filed with the Commission no later
than March 12, 2007.
All written submissions must conform
with the provisions of section 201.8 of
the Commission’s rules; any
submissions that contain BPI must also
conform with the requirements of
sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s
rules do not authorize filing of
submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means, except to
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
the extent permitted by section 201.8 of
the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67
FR 68036 (Nov. 8, 2002).
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules,
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:53 Mar 07, 2007 Jkt 211001
each document filed by a party to the
investigation must be served on all other
parties to the investigation (as identified
by either the public or BPI service list),
and a certificate of service must be
timely filed. The Secretary will not
accept a document for filing without a
certificate of service.
Parties are also advised to consult
with the Commission’s Rules of Practice
and Procedure, part 201, subparts A
through E (19 CFR part 201), and part
207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207) for
provisions of general applicability
concerning written submissions to the
Commission.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 2, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–4145 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent
Judgment Pursuant to Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
Notice is hereby given that on
February 28, 2007, a proposed Consent
Judgment in United States v. AGI–VR
Wesson Co. et al., Civil Action No. CV–
07–825, was lodged with the United
States District Court for the Eastern
District of New York.
The proposed Consent Judgment will
settle the United States’ claims on
behalf of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’) brought
against defendants AGI–VR/Wesson Co.,
Alloy Carbide Company, Chi Mei
Corporation, Climax Molybdenum
Company, Climax Molybdenum
Marketing Corporation, County of
Nassau, New York, Cyprus Amax
Minerals Company, General Electric
Company, GTE Corporation, H.C.
Starck, Inc., Kennametal Inc., M&R
Industries, Inc., Minmetals Inc., Osram
Sylvania Inc., Philips Electronics North
America Corporation, Sandvik, AB, TDY
Holding, LLC; and TDY Industries, Inc.,
(along with Adamas Carbide
Corporation and Kulite Tungsten Corp.)
pursuant to Sections 106 and 107 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9606 and
9607, with respect to the Li Tungsten
Superfund Site in Glen Cove, New York.
Pursuant to the Consent Judgment, a
total of $5.11 million will be paid by
settling defendants. Of this amount, $1.5
million will be denominated as a civil
penalty for failure to comply with an
PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
administrative order. In addition, TDY
will perform the remaining work at the
Site (other than that which EPA has
reserved to perform itself), which is
estimated by EPA at $10.7 million. The
Consent Decree also resolves claims
against four agencies of the United
States, the Department of Commerce,
the Department of Defense, the
Department of the Treasury, and the
General Services Administration
(‘‘Settling Federal Agencies’’). Pursuant
to the Consent Judgment, the Settling
Federal Agencies shall pay $25 million
to EPA and $1 million to TDY, and also
receive contribution protection.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
relating to the proposed Consent
Judgment. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and either e-mailed
to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
States v. AGI–VR Wesson Co., et al.,
Civil Action No. CV–07–835, D.J. Ref.
90–11–3–09093.
The proposed Consent Judgment may
be examined at the Office of the United
States Attorney, Eastern District of New
York, One Pierrepont Plaza, 14th Fl.,
Brooklyn, New York 11201, and at the
United States Environmental Protection
Agency, Region II, 290 Broadway, New
York, New York 10007–1866. During the
public comment period, the proposed
Consent Judgment may also be
examined on the following Department
of Justice Web site, http://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decress.html. A copy of the
proposed Consent Judgment may also be
obtained by mail from the Consent
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a
request to Tonia Fleetwood
(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–1547. If requesting a
copy by mail from the Consent Decree
Library, please enclose a check in the
amount of $208.00 ($0.25 per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury or, if requesting by e-
mail or fax, forward the check in that
amount to the Consent Decree Library at
the stated address. If requesting a copy
exclusive of exhibits, please enclose a
check in the amount of $32.25 ($0.25
08MRN1
 10558 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Notices
per page reproduction cost) payable to
the United States Treasury.
Ronald Gluck,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement
Section, Environment and Natural Resources
Division.
[FR Doc. 07–1070 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–15–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Pursuant to the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
In accordance with Departmental
policy, notice is hereby given that a
proposed consent decree in United
States v. Franks Petroleum Corp., et al.,
Civil Action No. 2:07–CV–0337, was
lodged with the United States Court for
the Western District of Louisiana on
February 23, 2007.
In a complaint filed with the consent
decree, the United States seeks
reimbursement for costs incurred in
connection with the Castex oilfield
waste disposal facility located near
Jennings, Louisiana (the ‘‘Site’’), from 11
settling defendants pursuant to section
107 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607. These 11
settling defendants agree to pay
$2,000,000 to resolve federal claims
relating to the Site.
The Department of Justice will
receive, for a period of thirty (30) days
from the date of this publication,
comments relating to the proposed
consent decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General for the Environmental and
Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box
7611, Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20044–7611, and
should refer to United States v. Franks
Petroleum Corp., et al., DOJ Ref. #90–5–
1–1–08095.
The proposed consent decree may be
examined at the office of the United
States Attorney, Western District of
Louisiana, 800 Lafayette Street, Suite
2200, Lafayette, LA 70501, and National
Pollution Funds Centers, 4200 Wilson
Blvd, Ste 1000, Arlington, VA 22203–
1804. A copy of the consent decree may
also be examined on the following
Department of Justice Web site, http://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
consent decree may also be obtained by
mail from the Consent Decree Library,
P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or
by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:53 Mar 07, 2007 Jkt 211001
Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov),
fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone
confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In
requesting a copy of the consent decree
without signature pages and
appendices, please enclose a check in
the amount of $6.00 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the U.S.
Treasury. Comments may be sent to:
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.
Thomas A. Mariani, Jr.,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 07–1069 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance;
Correction
This notice corrects the Notice of
Determinations Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance which was
published in the Federal Register on
February 27, 2007 (72 FR 8794–8795).
This revises the reporting period dates
on pages 8794–8795 to read February 12
through February 16, 2007 instead of
January 12 through January 16, 2007.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 1st day of
March 2007.
Ralph DiBattista,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–4058 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,136; TA–W–59,136B]
Cranston Print Works Company,
Design and Engraving Division,
Cranston, RI; Cranston Print Works
Company, Corporate Headquarters,
Cranston, RI; Amended Certification
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
Department of Labor issued a
Certification Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance on April 21,
2006, applicable to workers of Cranston
Print Works Company, Design and
Engraving Division, Cranston, Rhode
Island. The notice was published in the
Federal Register on May 10, 2006 (71
FR 27291).
At the request of the company, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in the production
of artwork designs used by the subject
firm to engrave rotary screens for
printing textile fabrics.
The company reports that worker
separations occurred at the Corporate
Headquarters facility of the subject firm
where the workers provide
administrative support functions for the
subject firm’s production plant located
in Cranston, Rhode Island.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending the
certification to include workers of the
Cranston Print Works Company,
Corporate Headquarters, Cranston,
Rhode Island.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
Cranston Print Works Company, Design
and Engraving Division who were
adversely affected by increased
company imports. The amended notice
applicable to TA-W–59,136 is hereby
issued as follows:
All workers of Cranston Print Works
Company, Design and Engraving Division,
Cranston, Rhode Island (TA–W–59,136) and
Cranston Print Works Company, Corporate
Headquarters, Cranston, Rhode Island (TA–
W–59,136B), who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after
March 6, 2005, through April 21, 2008, are
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974,
and are also eligible to apply for alternative
trade adjustment assistance under Section
246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
February 2007.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–4062 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM 08MRN1