00 positive Bewertungen00 negative Bewertungen

150 Ansichten210 Seitentermodyamic

Sep 04, 2015

© © All Rights Reserved

DOCX, PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

termodyamic

© All Rights Reserved

Als DOCX, PDF, TXT **herunterladen** oder online auf Scribd lesen

150 Ansichten

00 positive Bewertungen00 negative Bewertungen

termodyamic

© All Rights Reserved

Als DOCX, PDF, TXT **herunterladen** oder online auf Scribd lesen

Sie sind auf Seite 1von 210

https://www.ohio.edu/mechanical/thermo/

http://www.thermofluids.net/

http://www.ou.edu/theobjectlab/book.html

http://www.academia.edu/11767578/THERMODYNA

MICS_AN_ENGINEERING_APPROACH_8th_EDITION_2

015

This web resource is intended to be a totally self-contained learning resource in

Engineering Thermodynamics, independent of any textbook. It is designed to be

suitable for a two course sequence for Mechanical Engineering majors. It may,

however, be used in any format and for any purpose, including self-study. The various

unique pedagogical features of this web resource are discussed in Paper AC 2010-47,

which was presented at the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference. It is licensed under a

Creative CommonsAttribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United

States license and as such is freely available. Comments and constructive criticism are

welcomed by the author.

In Part 1 we introduce the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics. Rather than

applying these laws in terms of components and processes we have chosen a more

interesting approach of applying them to complete cycles or systems. The ideal

Stirling cycle machine is developed as a prime example of both Laws (refer to a

paper: A Meeting between Robert Stirling and Sadi Carnot in 1824 presented at

the 2014 ISEC.), and complete ideal heat engines, steam power plants and

refrigeration systems are evaluated in Chapters 3 and 4. Where appropriate, we

introduce graphical two-dimensional plots to evaluate the performance of these

systems rather than relying on equations and tables. This enables intuitive

visualization of the solutions to a high degree of accuracy.

Thermodynamics

Chapter 1: Introductory Concepts, Units, and Definitions

Chapter 2: Properties of Pure Substances

a) Phase Change, Property Tables and Diagrams

b) The Ideal Gas Equation of State

Thermodynamic Properties Tables and Charts

Chapter 3: The First Law of Thermodynamics for Closed Systems

a) The Energy Equation for Closed Systems

b) Ideal Stirling Cycle Machines (Engines / Coolers)

c) The Air Standard Diesel Cycle (Compression-Ignition) Engine

d) The Air Standard Otto Cycle (Spark-Ignition) Engine

Chapter 4: The First Law of Thermodynamics for Control Volumes

a) The Energy Equation for Control Volumes

b) Steam Power Plants

c) Refrigeration Systems

Chapter 5: The Second Law of Thermodynamics

Chapter 6: Entropy - A New Property

a) Defining and Evaluating Entropy

We present an Entropy Summary Sheet, Isentropic Processes Summary Sheet,

and an Adiabatic Efficiency Summary Sheet of all the relevant equations relating

to this Section.

b) Aircraft Gas Turbine Engines

In Part 2 we introduce the concept of Exergy to determine theoretical limits of

performance of various thermodynamic components and systems, followed by

advanced application of steam power plants. The chapter on Carbon Dioxide as a

refrigerant does not appear in any textbook that I am aware of. Because of the Global

Warming crisis, the currently used refrigerant, R134a, will be banned from usage in

automobile air conditioning systems in Europe within a few years. Among the

alternatives being developed we prefer to return to Carbon Dioxide as the refrigerant

of choice. Finally we introduce mixtures of water vapor and air and their application in

air-conditioning and cooling tower systems, and conclude with an introduction to

combustion processes.

Chapter 7: Exergy - Maximum Available Work Potential

a) Reversible Work, Irreversibility, Second Law Efficiency

b) Examples of Adiabatic Control Volumes

c) Heat Transfer from a Thermal Source

Chapter 8: Steam Power Cycles

a) Ideal Rankine and Reheat Cycles

b) Regenerative Cycles - Open and Closed Feedwater Heaters

Case Study - The General James M. Gavin Steam Power Plant

Chapter 9: Carbon Dioxide (R744) The New Refrigerant

a) Humidity and the Adiabatic Saturation Process

b) The Psychrometric Chart and Air Conditioning Processes

c) Cooling Towers for Steam Power Plants

Chapter 11: Combustion

Combustion Molar Enthalpy Tables

In this chapter various relevant concepts and definitions are introduced, and will be

used throughout the course.

Thermodynamics is the science of energy, including energy storage and energy in

transit. The Conservation of Energy Principle states that energy cannot be created or

destroyed, but can only change its form. The three forms of energy storage of greatest

interest to us are Potential Energy (PE), Kinetic Energy (KE), and Internal

Energy (U), which we introduce below. The two forms of energy in transit that we

consider are Work (W) and Heat (Q), and the interactions between these various

forms of energy are defined in terms of the First Law of Thermodynamics, which we

introduce in Chapter 3.

A Word on Units

In this course we use the International System (SI) units exclusively, with occasional

lapses. In the US this is an ongoing battle causing much confusion in the global

technical environment (refer to wikipedia on this subject). Even the National Council

of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) seems to be confused at this

point - the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Reference Handbook and exam contain

exclusively SI units and then, when you reach maturity and are ready to take the

Professional Engineering (PE) exam, you find that the English system of units (USCS)

is acceptable, and in some cases used exclusively. This confusion reached a new

climax when in the Fall of 1999, NASA's $125 million Mars Climate Orbiter broke

up in the Martian atmosphere, because scientists in one of NASA's subcontractors

failed to convert critical data from the English sytem to the SI system of units.

Force and Work

We begin with Newton's Second Law, as follows:

The Weight of a body is the force acting on that body due to the acceleration due to

gravity (g = 9.807 [m/s2]), in accordance with the Universal Theory of Gravitation

developed by Isaac Newton. Legend has it that Newton was inspired by an apple

falling on his head, as is shown in a delightful website by Mike Guidry of the

University of Tennessee on Sir Isaac Newton, in which we see a cartoon showing the

apple falling on Newton's head.

Well, this legend is extremely relevant, since the weight of a small apple is

approximately one Newton. Furthermore, the mass of a plastic bottle containing one

liter of water is approximately one kilogram.

Quick Quiz - can you estimate how many Newtons (or apples) a liter of water

weighs?

At this point we note that the major confusion of the English system of units came

about because of the decision to define mass and force independently as 1 lb (pound),

when in fact they are related through Newton's Second Law. In order to justify this one

has to separately define a pound mass (lbm) and a pound force (lbf), thus since the

acceleraton due to gravity g = 32.2 [ft/s2] we have:

One attempt to solve this paradox has been the introduction of a new unit of mass, the

"slug", thus:

1 slug = 32.2 lbm

however I challenge anyone to go to the grocery store and request a slug of potatos.

We now consider the work done (W), the energy in transit requiring both the applied

force (F) and movement (x). If the force (F) is constant over the distance moved (x)

then the work done is given by:

However, in general the force (F) is not constant over the distance x, thus we need to

sum all the incremental work processes taking into consideration the variation of the

force (F). This leads to the equivalent integral form for determining work done (W) as

follows:

Over the years we have developed a basic Units Survival Kit (for the SI challenged) in

order to help convert between the USCS (English) system and the SI (International)

system of units, as well as to develop a feel for the magnitudes of the various units.

Quick Quiz - we all know (from reading our speedometers) that 50 mph is equivalent

to 80 km/hr.

1. What is the accuracy of this conversion?

2. Use this information to show that 9 mph is equivalent to 4 m/s.

We find that with the above survival kit we can determine many unit conversions

between SI & English units, typically as demonstrated in the following block:

As we progress and learn new concepts we will add to this Survival Kit.

Forms of Energy

We introduce the various forms of energy of interest to us in terms of a solid body

having a mass m [kg]. These include potential, kinetic and internal energy. Potential

energy (PE) is associated with the elevation of the body, and can be evaluated in terms

of the work done to lift the body from one datum level to another under a constant

acceleration due to gravity g [m/s2], as follows:

Kinetic energy (KE) of a body is associated with its velocity [m/s] and can be

evaluated in terms of the work required to change the velocity of the body, as follows:

Internal energy (U) of a body is that associated with the molecular activity of the body

as indicated by its temperature T [C], and can be evaluated in terms of the heat

required to change the temperature of the body having a specific heat capacity C

[J/kg.C], as follows:

In order to gain an intuitive appreciation for the relative magnitudes of the different

forms of energy we consider the (tongue-in-cheek) example of an attempt to cook a

turkey by potential energy. The turkey is brought to the top of a 100 m building (about

30 stories) and then dropped from the ledge. The potential energy is thus converted

into kinetic energy, and finally on impact the kinetic energy is converted into internal

energy. The increase in internal energy is represented by an increase in temperature,

and hopefully, if this experiment is repeated enough times the temperature increase

will allow the turkey to cook. This remarkable experiment was first reported by

R.C.Gimmi and Gloria J Browne - "Cooking with Potential Energy", published in

the Journal of Irreproducible Results (Vol 33, 1987, pp 21-22).

What a disappointment! At 0.33C per fall it will require repeating the experiment 600

times just to reach the cooking temperature of 200C.

Thermodynamic Systems

For purposes of analysis we consider two types of Thermodynamic Systems:

Closed System - usually referred to as a System or a Control Mass. This type

of system is separated from its surroundings by a physical boundary. Energy in

transit in the form of Work or Heat can flow across the system boundary,

however there can be no mass flow across the boundary. One typical example of

a system is a piston / cylinder device in which the system is defined as the fixed

addition to work or heat, we have mass flow of the working fluid across the

system boundaries through inlet and outlet ports. In this course we will be

exclusively concerned with steady flow control volumes, in that the net mass of

working fluid within the system boundaries remains constant (ie mass flow in

[kg/s] = mass flow out [kg/s]). The following sections refer mainly to systems we will consider control volumes in more detail starting with Chapter 4a.

Properties of a System

The closed system shown above can be defined by its various Properties, such as its

pressure (P), temperature (T), volume (V) and mass (m). We will introduce and define

the various properties of thermodynamic interest as needed in context. Furthermore the

properties can be either Extensive or Intensive (or Specific). An extensive property is

one whose value depends on the mass of the system, as opposed to an intensive

property (such as pressure or temperature) which is independent of the system mass. A

specific property is an intensive property which has been obtained by dividing the

extensive property by the mass of the system. Two examples follow - notice that

specific properties will always have kilograms (kg) in the units denominater.

One often used exception to the above definitions is the concept of Specific Weight,

defined as the weight per unit volume. We will not be using this concept throughout

this text.

State and Equilibrium

The State of a system is defined by the values of the various intensive properties of

the system. The State Postulate states that if two independent intensive property

values are defined, then all the other intensive property values (and thus the state of

the system) are also defined. This can significantly simplify the graphical

representation of a system, since only two-dimensional plots are required. Note that

pressure and temperature are not necessarily independent properties, thus a boiling

liquid will change its state from liquid to vapor at a constant temperature and pressure.

We assume that throughout the system Equilibrium conditions prevail, thus there are

no temperature or pressure gradients or transient effects. At any instant the entire

system is under chemical and phase equilibrium.

Process and Cycle

A Process is a change of state of a system from an initial to a final state due to an

energy interaction (work or heat) with its surroundings. For example in the following

diagram the system has undergone a compression process in the piston-cylinder

device.

The Process Path defines the type of process undergone. Typical process paths are:

Isothermal (constant temperature process)

Isobaric (constant pressure process)

Adiabatic (no heat flow to or from the system during the process)

We assume that all processes are Quasi-Static in that equilibrium is attained after each

incremental step of the process.

A system undergoes a Cycle when it goes through a sequence of processes that leads

the system back to its original state.

Pressure

The basic unit of pressure is the Pascal [Pa], however practical units are kiloPascal

[kPa], bar [100 kPa] or atm (atmosphere) [101.32 kPa]. The Gage (or Vacuum)

pressure is related to the Absolute pressure as shown in the diagram below:

below:

Building This solved problem allows us to determine the height of a building in terms

of the difference in atmospheric pressure between the top and bottom of the building.

Note that according to legend, when this problem was put to Nobel Prize Winner Niels

Bohr (while still a student), he came up with an interesting response, as shown on the

following Australian website of the Virtual Teacher.

downstream pressure of compressed air flowing in a pipe

Temperature

two bodies in contact (for example the immediate surroundings and the system) is the

driving force leading to heat transfer between them.

Both the Fahrenheit and the Celsius scales are in common usage in the US, hence it

is important to be able to convert between them. Furthermore we will find that in some

cases we require the Absolute (Rankine and Kelvin) temperature scales (for example

when using the Ideal Gas Equation of State), thus we find it convenient to plot all four

scales as follows:

Notice from the plot that -40C equals -40F, leading to convenient formulas for

converting between the two scales as follows:

Quick Quiz - The temperature in Chicago in winter can be as low as 14F. What is the

temperature in C, K, and R. [-10C, 263 K, 474R] Note that by convention 263 K is

read "263 Kelvin," and not "263 degrees Kelvin".

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

_____________________________________________________-

Height of a Building

In this problem we use the basic mercury barometer to determine the height of a

building. Consider the case that the barometer reading at the top of the building is 751

mm Hg, and at the bottom of the building is 760 mm Hg. Assume the density of

mercury Hg= 13,600 kg/m3, and that the average density of the column of air air =

1.18 kg/m3.

The approach to solution is illustrated in the following diagram. A free-body force

diagram on the column of air allows us to determine the height as a function of the

pressure difference P from top to bottom.

Well, exactly 100m? - obviously this is a contrived example. When we first evaluated

the height we came up with the result:

significant digits. The question that one really should ask is "Is this a reasonable

method to measure the height of a building?" and the answer is a resounding NO! In

the following we do an uncertainty analysis and find that unless we also measure the

air temperature during this experiment (why? temperature doesn't even appear in the

above equations!) then this method has an accuracy of:

height = 100 42 m

Unacceptable by any standards.

-________________________________________________________

drop and downstream pressure of compressed air flowing in

a pipe

A Throttling Valve is often used to control the downstream pressure of a high

pressure fluid (such as steam or air) flowing in a pipe. In the following diagram we

have a water manometer to measure the pressure drop P caused by the throttling

valve as well as a mercury manometer to measure the downstream pressure of the air.

If the height difference in the water manometer h w is 150 cm, and that in the mercury

manometer hHg is 225 cm, determine a) the pressure difference P [14.7 kPa] and b)

the downstream absolute pressure of the air P2 [400 kPa]. Assume that the density of

water is 1000 kg/m3, the density of mercury is 13,600 kg/m3, and that the

atmospheric pressure is 100 kPa.

_____________________________________________________________

a) Phase Change, Property Tables and Diagrams

In this chapter we consider the property values and relationships of a pure substance

(such as water) which can exist in three phases - solid, liquid and gas. We will not

consider the solid phase in this course.

In order to introduce the rather complex phase change interactions that occur in pure

substances we consider an experiment in which we have liquid water in a pistoncylinder device at 20C and 100kPa pressure.. Heat is added to the cylinder while the

pressure is maintained constant until the temperature reaches 300C, as shown in the

following T-v diagram (temperature vs specific volume):

From State (1) to State (2) the water maintains its liquid phase and the specific volume

increases very slightly until the temperature reaches close to 100C (State (2)

- Saturated Liquid). As more heat is added the water progressively changes phase

from liquid to water vapor (steam) while maintaining the temperature at 100C

(Saturation Temperature - Tsat) until there is no liquid remaining in the cylinder

(State (4) - Saturated Vapor). If heating continues then the water vapor temperature

increases (T > Tsat) and is said to be in the Superheated (State (5)).

Notice that during this entire process the specific volume of the water increased by

more than three orders of magnitude, which made it necessary to use a logarithmic

scale for the specific volume axis.

We now consider repeating this experiment at various pressures, as shown in the

following T-v diagram:

Notice that as we increase the applied pressure, the region between the saturated liquid

and saturated vapor decreases until we reach the Critical Point, above which there is

no clear distinction between the liquid and vapor states.

It is common practice to join the loci of saturated liquid and saturated vapor points as

shown in the T-v diagram below.

The saturation lines define the regions of interest as shown in the diagram, being

the Compressed Liquid region, the Quality region enclosed by the saturation lines,

and the Superheat region (which also includes the Transcritical region) to the right

of the saturated vapor line and above the critical point. We will use Property

Tables associated with the regions in order to evaluate the various properties. Notice

that we have provided property tables of steam, Refrigerant R134a, and Carbon

Dioxide, which we believe is destined to become the future refrigerant of common

usage.

The Quality Region (also referred to as the Saturated Liquid-Vapor Mixture

Region) is enclosed between the saturated liquid line and the saturated vapor line, and

at any point within this region the quality of the mixture (also referred to as the

dryness factor) is defined as the mass of vapor divided by the total mass of the fluid, as

shown in the following diagram:

Notice that properties relating to the saturated liquid have the subscript f, and those

relating to the saturated vapor have the subscript g. In order to evaluate the quality

consider a volume V containing a mass m of a saturated liquid-vapor mixture.

Notice from the steam property tables that we have also included three new

properties: internal energy u [kJ/kg], enthalpy h [kJ/kg], and entropy s [kJ/kg.K] all of

which will be defined as needed in future sections. At this stage we note that the 3

equations relating quality and specific volume can also be evaluated in terms of these

three additional properties.

The above discussion was done in terms of the T-v diagram, however recall from

Chapter 1 when we defined the State Postulate that any two independent intensive

properties can be used to completely define all other intensive state properties. It is

often advantageous to use the P-v diagram with temperature as the parameter as in the

following diagram:

Notice that because of the extremely large range of pressure and specific volume

values of interest, this can only be done on a log-log plot. This is extremely

inconvenient, so both the T-v and the P-v diagrams are normally not drawn to scale,

however are sketched only in order to help define the problem, which is then solved in

terms of the steam tables. This approach is illustrated in the following solved

problems.

Solved Problem 2.1 - Two kilograms of water at 25C are placed in a piston

cylinder device under 100 kPa pressure as shown in the diagram (State (1)). Heat is

added to the water at constant pressure until the piston reaches the stops at a total

volume of 0.4 m3 (State (2)). More heat is then added at constant volume until the

temperature of the water reaches 300C (State (3)). Determine (a) the quality of the

fluid and the mass of the vapor at state (2), and (b) the pressure of the fluid at state (3).

Step 1: Always draw a complete diagram of the states and processes of the problem

and include all the relevant information on the diagram. In this case there are three

states and two processes (constant pressure and constant volume).

Step 2: In the case of a closed system with a phase change fluid, always sketch

a T_v or P_v diagram indicating all the relevant states and processes on the diagram.

As mentioned above this diagram will not be drawn to scale, however it will help to

define the problem and the approach to solution. In the case of steam, as we determine

various values from the steam tables we add these values to the diagram, typically as

shown below:

Notice that the T_v diagram is based exclusively on intensive properties, hence mass is

not indicated on the diagram. Thus we indicate on the diagram that in order to

determine the quality at state (2) we need to first evaluate the specific volume v 2,

which can then be compared to the saturation values v f and vg at the pressure of 100

kPa.

Thus v2 = V / m = 0.4 [m3] / 2 [kg] = 0.2 [m3 / kg]

Concerning state (3), the problem statement did not specify that it is in the superheat

region. We needed to first determine the saturated vapor specific volume v g at 300C.

This value is 0.0216 m3 / kg, which is much less than the specific volume v 3 of 0.2

m3 / kg, thus placing state (3) well into the superheated region. Thus the two intensive

properties which we use to determine the pressure at state (3) are T 3 = 300C, and v3 =

0.2 m3 / kg. On scanning the superheat tables we find that the closest values lie

somewhere between 1.2 MPa and 1.4 MPa, thus we use linear interpolation techniqes

to determine the actual pressure P3 as shown below:

Solved Problem 2.2 - Two kilograms of water at 25C are placed in a piston

cylinder device under 3.2 MPa pressure as shown in the diagram (State (1)). Heat is

added to the water at constant pressure until the temperature of the fluid reaches 350C

(State (2)). Determine the final volume of the fluid at state (2).

In this example since the pressure is known (3.2 MPa) and remains constant

throughout the process, we find it convenient to draw a P-v diagram indicating the

process (1) - (2) as follows.

As in the previous example, on scanning the superheat tables we find that we need to

interpolate between pressure P = 3.0 MPa and P = 3.5 MPa in order to determine the

specific volume at the required pressure of 3.2 MPa as follows:

water having a total mass of 0.5 kg at a pressure of 160 kPa and an initial volume of

100 liters. Heat is then added and the fluid expands at constant pressure until it reaches

a saturated vapor state.

a) Draw a diagram representing the process showing the initial and final states

of the system.

b) Sketch this process on a P-v diagram with respect to the saturation lines,

critical point, and relevant constant temperature lines, clearly indicating the

initial and final states.

c) Determine the initial quality and temperature of the fluid mixture prior to

heating. [quality x1 = 0.182, T1 = 113.3C]

d) Determine the final volume of the steam after heating. [0.546 m3 (546

liters)]

Note: 1000 liters - 1 m3.

Problem 2.4 - A pressure cooker allows much faster (and more tender) cooking

by maintaining a higher boiling temperature of the water inside. It is well sealed, and

steam can only escape through an opening on the lid, on which sits a metal petcock.

When the pressure overcomes the weight of the petcock, the steam escapes,

maintaining a constant high pressure while the water boils.

Assuming that the opening under the petcock has an area of 8 mm2, determine

a) the mass of the petcock required in order to maintain an operating pressure of

99 kPa gage. [80.7gm]

b) the corresponding temperature of the boiling water. [120.2C]

Note: Assume that the atmospheric pressure is 101 kPa. Draw a free body diagram of

the petcock.

On to Chapter 2b) of Pure Substances

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

b) The Ideal Gas Equation of State

We continue with our discussion on Pure Substances.

We find that for a pure substance in the superheated region, at specific volumes much

higher than that at the critical point, the P-v-T relation can be conveniently expressed

by the Ideal Gas Equation of State to a high degree of accuracy, as follows:

Pv=RT

where: R is constant for a particular substance and is called the Gas Constant

Note that for the ideal gas equation both the pressure P and the temperature T must be

expressed in absolute quantities.

Consider for example the T-v duagram for water as shown below:

The shaded zone in the diagram indicates the region that can be represented by the

Ideal Gas equation to an error of less than 1%. Note that at the critical point the error

is 330%.

The gas constant R can be expressed as follows:

The three commonly used formats to express the Ideal Gas Equation of State are:

water at a pressure of 200 kPa. Heat is added and the steam expands at constant

pressure until it reaches 300C.

a) Draw a diagram representing the process showing the initial and final states

of the system.

b) Sketch this process on a T-v (temperature-specific volume) diagram with

respect to the saturation lines, critical point, and relevant constant pressure

lines, clearly indicating the initial and final states.

c) Using steam tables determine the initial temperature of the steam prior to

heating.

d) Using steam tables determine the final volume of the steam after heating

e) Using the ideal gas equation of state determine the final volume of the steam

after heating. Determine the percentage error of using this method compared to

that of using the steam tables.

Note: The critical point data and the ideal gas constant for steam can be found on the

first page of the steam tables.

Solution Approach:

Even if questions a) and b) were not required, this should always be the first priority

item in solving a thermodynamic problem.

c) Since state (1) is specified as saturated liquid at 200 kPa, we use the saturated

pressure steam tables to determine that T1 = Tsat@ 200kPa = 120.2C.

d) From the T-v diagram we determine that state (2) is in the superheated region, thus

we use the superheated steam tables to determine that v2 = v200kPa,300C = 1.3162

m3/kg. Thus V2 = m,v2 = (0,5kg).(1.3162 m3/kg) = 0.658 m3 (658 liters)

Note that in doing a units check we find that the following conversion appears so often

that we feel it should be added to our Units Conversion Survival Kit (recall Chapter

1):

Finally we determine the percentage error of using the ideal gas equation at state (2)

Problem 2.6 - Consider a rigid container having a volume of 100 liters, filled with

steam at an initial state of 400 kPa and 300C. The steam is then cooled until it reaches

a temperature of 90C.

a) Draw a diagram representing the process showing the initial and final states

of the system.

b) Using steam tables determine the mass of steam in the container. [0.153 kg]

c) Using the ideal gas equation of state determine the mass of steam in the

container. [0.151 kg]

Determine the percentage error of using this method compared to that of using

the steam tables. [1%]

d) Sketch this process on a T-v (temperature-specific volume) diagram with

respect to the saturation lines, critical point, and relevant constant pressure

lines, clearly indicating the initial and final states.

e) Using steam tables determine the final pressure and quality of the fluid

mixture after cooling. [70.2 kPa, X = 0.277]

Note: The critical point data and ideal gas constant for steam can be found on the first

page of the steam tables.

Solved Problem 2.7 - An automobile tire with a volume of 100 liters is inflated

to a gage pressure of 210 kPa. Determine a) the mass of air in the tire if the

temperature is 20C, and b) the increase in gage pressure if the temperature in the tire

reaches 50C. Assume that atmospheric pressure is 100 kPa.

Solution Approach:

We always begin a thermodynamic problem with a sketch, indicating all the relevant

information on the sketch, thus:

For part b) the temperature in the tire increases to 50C (323K), however the volume

and mass of air in the tire remains constant, thus:

(Note for the SI challenged - initially the pressure was 30 psig, and then rose to 35

psig. Try to validate these values)

standard temperature distribution in the atmosphere near the surface of the earth (up to

an elevation z of 10000m) as T(z) = (T0 + a.z)C, where T0 at the earth's surface is

15C, and a is the Temperature Lapse Rate (= 0.00651C / m). Using the Ideal Gas

Equation of State, determine the pressure at an elevation of 3000m if at z = 0, P = 101

kPa.

Solution Approach:

We first develop the solution in terms of the Hydrostatic Equation on an elemental

height of the column of air, the Ideal Gas Equation of State, and the Temperature

Lapse Rate equation, as follows:

knowing the value of air pressure at 3000m altitude. In the following example we

continue with the above development in order to evaluate the payload that can be lifted

to an altitude of 3000m using a small hot air balloon (Volume =1000 m3) having an

empty mass of 100kg. Assume that the temperature of the air in the balloon is 100C.

Solution Approach:

In this case we develop the solution in terms of a force balance between the bouyancy

force (weight of the displaced air) and the gravity force including the weight of the hot

air, the balloon empty mass, and the payload mass. The maximum altitude occurs

when those two forces are equal, as follows:

Finally - with 154 kg payload at least 2 persons can share and enjoy this wonderful

experience. Unfortunately they will not be able to enjoy a decent cup of English tea.

At a pressure of 69.9 kPa water will boil at (heavens forbid) < 90C! (Saturation

temperature Tsat from the Steam Tables). Quick quiz: determine the temperature

of a cup of tea in Denver, Colorado (elevation 5000 ft), or on the peaks of the Rocky

Mountains (elevation 14000 ft. Hint: use the Units Survival Kit presented

in Chapter1 to first convert from feet to meters)

________________________________________________________________

We noticed in the above T-v diagram for water that the gasses can deviate significantly

from the ideal gas equation of state in regions nearby the critical point and there have

been many equations of state recommended for use to account for this non-ideal

behaviour. However, this non-ideal behaviour can be accounted for by a correction

factor called the Compressibility Factor Z defined as follows:

thus when the compressibility factor Z approaches 1 the gas behaves as an ideal gas.

Note that under the same conditions of temperature and pressure, the compressibility

factor can be expressed as:

Different fluids have different values of critical point pressure and temperature data

PCR and TCR, and these can be determined from the Table of Critical Point Data of

Various Substances. Fortunately the Principle of Corresponding States states that

we can normalize the pressure and temperature values with the critical values as

follows:

All fluids normalized in this manner exhibit similar non-ideal gas behaviour within a

few percent, thus they can all be plotted on a Generalised Compressibility Chart. A

number of these charts are available, however we prefer to use the Lee-Kesler

(logarithmic) Compressibilty Chart, The use of the compressibility chart is shown in

the following example.

Solved Problem 2.10 - Carbon Dioxide gas is stored in a 100 liter tank at 6

MPa and 30C. Determine the mass of CO 2 in the tank based on (a) values obtained

from the CO2 tables of data, (b) the ideal gas equation of state, and (c) the generalized

compressibility chart. Compare (b) and (c) to (a) and determine the percentage error in

each case.

Solution Approach:

We first determine the Critical Point data for CO 2 from the Table of Critical Point

Data of Various Substances

After evaluating the Reduced Pressure and Reduced Temperature we plot them on

the Generalized Compressibility Chart in order to determine the Compressibility

Factor, as shown below

The actual value of specific volume va is obtained from the CO2 Superheat Tables

The general rule is that if P << PCR or if T >> TCR then you are probably dealing with

an ideal gas. If in doubt always check the Compressibility Factor Z on the

Compressibility Chart.

Thermodynamics for Closed Systems

Chapter 3: The First Law of Thermodynamics for Closed

Systems

a) The Energy Equation for Closed Systems

We consider the First Law of Thermodynamics applied to stationary closed systems as

a conservation of energy principle. Thus energy is transferred between the system and

the surroundings in the form of heat and work, resulting in a change of internal energy

of the system. Internal energy change can be considered as a measure of molecular

activity associated with change of phase or temperature of the system and the energy

equation is represented as follows:

Heat (Q)

Energy transferred across the boundary of a system in the form of heat always results

from a difference in temperature between the system and its immediate surroundings.

We will not consider the mode of heat transfer, whether by conduction, convection or

radiation, thus the quantity of heat transferred during any process will either be

specified or evaluated as the unknown of the energy equation. By convention, positive

heat is that transferred from the surroundings to the system, resulting in an increase in

internal energy of the system

Work (W)

In this course we consider three modes of work transfer across the boundary of a

system, as shown in the following diagram:

In this course we are primarily concerned with Boundary Work due to compression

or expansion of a system in a piston-cylinder device as shown above. In all cases we

assume a perfect seal (no mass flow in or out of the system), no loss due to friction,

and quasi-equilibrium processes in that for each incremental movement of the piston

equilibrium conditions are maintained. By convention positive work is that done by

the system on the surroundings, and negative work is that done by the surroundings on

the system, Thus since negative work results in an increase in internal energy of the

system, this explains the negative sign in the above energy equation.

Boundary work is evaluated by integrating the force F multiplied by the incremental

distance moved dx between an initial state (1) to a final state (2). We normally deal

with a piston-cylinder device, thus the force can be replaced by the piston area A

multiplied by the pressure P, allowing us to replace A.dx by the change in volume dV,

as follows:

This is shown in the following schematic diagram, where we recall that integration can

be represented by the area under the curve.

Note that work done is a Path Function and not a property, thus it is dependent on the

process path between the initial and final states. Recall in Chapter 1 that we

introduced some typical process paths of interest:

Isothermal (constant temperature process)

Isochoric or Isometric (constant volume process)

Isobaric (constant pressure process)

Adiabatic (no heat flow to or from the system during the process)

It is sometimes convenient to evaluate the specific work done which can be

represented by a P-v diagram thus if the mass of the system is m [kg] we have finally:

We note that work done by the system on the surroundings (expansion process) is

positive, and that done on the system by the surroundings (compression process) is

negative.

Finally for a closed system Shaft Work (due to a paddle wheel) and Electrical

Work (due to a voltage applied to an electrical resistor or motor driving a paddle

wheel) will always be negative (work done on the system). Positive forms of shaft

work, such as that due to a turbine, will be considered in Chapter 4 when we discuss

open systems.

The third component of our Closed System Energy Equation is the change of internal

energy resulting from the transfer of heat or work. Since specific internal energy is a

property of the system, it is usually presented in the Property Tables such as in

the Steam Tables. Consider for example the following solved problem.

Solved Problem 3.1 - Recall the Solved Problem 2.2 in Chapter 2a in which

we presented a constant pressure process. We wish to extend the problem to include

the energy interactions of the process, hence we restate it as follows:

Two kilograms of water at 25C are placed in a piston cylinder device under 3.2 MPa

pressure as shown in the diagram (State (1)). Heat is added to the water at constant

pressure until the temperature of the steam reaches 350C (State (2)). Determine the

work done by the fluid (W) and heat transferred to the fluid (Q) during this process.

Solution Approach:

We first draw the diagram of the process including all the relevant data as follows:

Notice the four questions to the right of the diagram, which we should always ask

before attempting to solve any thermodynamic problem. What are we dealing with liquid? pure fluid, such as steam or refrigerant? ideal gas? In this case it is steam, thus

we will use the steam tables to determine the various properties at the various states. Is

the mass or volume given? If so we will specify and evaluate the energy equation in

kiloJoules rather than specific quantities (kJ/kg). What about entropy? Not so fast - we

have not yet considered enthalpy (below) - wait patiently until Chapter 6.

Since work involves the integral of P.dv we find it convenient to sketch the Pv diagram of the problem as follows:

Notice on the P-v diagram how we determine the specific work done as the area under

the process curve. We also notice that in the Compressed Liquid region the constant

temperature line is essentially vertical. Thus all the property values at State (1)

(compressed liquid at 25C) can be determined from the saturated liquid table values

at 25C.

In the case studies that follow we find that one of the major applications of the closed

system energy equation is in heat engine processes in which the system is

approximated by an ideal gas, thus we will develop relations to determine the internal

energy for an ideal gas. We will find also that a new property called Enthalpy will be

useful both for Closed Systems and in particular for Open Systems, such as the

components of steam power plants or refrigeration systems. Enthalpy is not a

fundamental property, however is a combination of properties and is defined as

follows:

As an example of its usage in closed systems, consider the following constant pressure

process:

However, since the pressure is constant throughout the process:

Values for specific internal energy (u) and specific enthalpy (h) are available from

the Steam Tables, however for ideal gasses it is necessary to develop equations for u

and h in terms of Specific Heat Capacities. We develop these equations in terms of

the differential form of the energy equation in the following web page:

Specific Heat Capacities of an Ideal Gas

We have provided property values for various ideal gases, including the gas constant

and specific heat capacities in the following web page:

Properties of Various Ideal Gases (at 300 K)

__________________________________________________________________

On to Part b) of The First Law - Stirling Cycle Engines

On to Part c) of The First Law - Diesel Cycle Engines

On to Part d) of The First Law - Otto Cycle Engines

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

_______________________________________

Specific Heat Capacities of an Ideal Gas

For a simple system, internal energy (u) is a function of two independant variables,

thus we assume it to be a function of temperature T and specific volume v, hence:

Substituting equation (2) in the energy equation (1) and simplifying, we obtain:

That is, the specific constant volume heat capacity of a system is a function only of its

internal energy and temperature. Now in his classic experiment of 1843 Joule showed

that the internal energy of an ideal gas is a function of temperature only, and not of

pressure or specific volume. Thus for an ideal gas the partial derivatives can be

replaced by ordinary derivatives, and the change in internal energy can be expressed

as:

Again for a simple system, enthalpy (h) is a function of two independant variables,

thus we assume it to be a function of temperature T and pressure P, hence:

That is, the specific constant pressure heat capacity of a system is a function only of its

enthalpy and temperature. Now by definition

Now since for an ideal gas Joule showed that internal energy is a function of

temperature only, it follows from the above equation that enthalpy is a function of

temperature only. Thus for an ideal gas the partial derivatives can be replaced by

ordinary derivatives, and the differential changes in enthalpy can be expressed as

Values of R, CP, Cv and k for ideal gases are presented (at 300K) in the table

on Properties of Various Ideal Gases. Note that the values of CP, Cv and k are

constant with temperature only for mon-atomic gases such as helium and argon. For

all other gases their temperature dependence can be considerable and needs to be

considered. We find it convenient to express this dependence in tabular form and have

provided a table of Specific Heat Capacities of Air.

Systems

b) Ideal Stirling Cycle Machines (Engines / Coolers)

1. The Stirling Cycle Engine

Conceptually the Stirling engine is the simplest of all heat engines. It has no valves,

and includes an externally heated space and an externally cooled space. It was

invented by Robert Stirling, and an interesting website by Bob Sier includes a

photograph of Robert Stirling, his original patent drawing of 1816, and an animated

model of Stirling's original engine.

In its original single cylinder form the working gas (typically air

or helium) is sealed within its cylinders by the piston and shuttled

between the hot and cold spaces by a displacer. The linkage

driving the piston and displacer will move them such that the gas

will compress while it is mainly in the cool compression space

and expand while in the hot expansion space. This is clearly

illustrated in the adjacent animation which was produced by

Richard Wheeler (Zephyris) of Wikipedia.

Refer also to the animation produced by Matt Keveney in

his Stirling engine animation website. Since the gas is at a

higher temperature, and therefore pressure, during its expansion

than during its compression, more power is produced during

expansion than is reabsorbed during compression, and this net

excess power is the useful output of the engine. Note that there are

no valves or intermittent combustion, which is the major source of

noise in an internal combustion engine. The same working gas is

used over and over again, making the Stirling engine a sealed,

closed cycle system. All that is added to the system is steady high

temperature heat, and all that is removed from the system is low

temperature (waste) heat and mechanical power.

Athens, Ohio, is a hotbed of Stirling cycle machine activity, both engines and coolers,

and includes R&D and manufacturing companies as well as internationally recognized

consultants in the area of Stirling cycle computer analysis. The parent company of this

activity is Sunpower, Inc. It was formed by William Beale in the early 1970's, mainly

based on his invention of the free-piston Stirling engine which we describe

below. Update (Jan. 2013): Sunpower was recently acquired by AMETEK, Inc in

Pensylvania, however continues doing Stirling cycle machine development in Athens,

Ohio. Update (Nov. 2013): Sunpower has recently introduced a 1 kW Stirling

Developers Kit based on a free piston Stirling engine fired by Propane or natural gas.

Some examples of single cylinder Stirling engines: Stirling Technology Inc. is a

spinoff of Sunpower, and was formed in order to continue the development and

manufacture of the 5 kW ST-5 Air engine. This large single cylinder engine burns

biomass fuel (such as sawdust pellets or rice husks) and can function as a cogeneration

unit in rural areas. It is not a free-piston engine, and uses a bell crank mechanism to

obtain the correct displacer phasing. Another important early Stirling engine is

Lehmann's machine on which Gusav Schmidt did the first reasonable analysis of

Stirling engines in 1871. Andy Ross of Columbus, Ohio built a small working replica

of the Lehmann machine, as well as a model air engine.

Solar Heat and Power Cogeneration: With the current energy and global warming

crises, there is renewed interest in renewable energy systems, such as wind and solar

energy, and distributed heat and power cogeneration systems. Cool Energy, Inc of

Boulder, Colorado, is currently in advanced stages of developing a complete solar heat

and power cogeneration system for home usage incorporating Stirling engine

technology for electricity generation. This unique application includes evacuated tube

solar thermal collectors, thermal storage, hot water and space heaters, and a Stirling

engine/generator.

Ideal Analysis: Please note that the following analysis of Stirling cycle engines is

ideal, and is intended only as an example of First Law Analysis of closed systems. In

the real world we cannot expect actual machines to perform any better than 40 - 50%

of the ideal machine. The analysis of actual Stirling cycle machines is extremely

complex and requires sophisticated computer analysis (see for example the course

notes on: Stirling Cycle Machine Analysis.)

The free-piston Stirling engine developed by Sunpower, Inc is unique in that there is

no mechanical connection between the piston and the displacer, thus the correct

phasing between them occurs by use of gas pressure and spring forces. Electrical

power is removed from the engine by permanent magnets attached to the piston

driving a linear alternator. Basically the ideal Stirling engine undergoes 4 distinct

processes, each one of which can be separately analysed, as shown in the P-V diagram

below. We consider first the work done during all four processes.

Process 1-2 is the compression process in which the gas is compressed by the

piston while the displacer is at the top of the cylinder. Thus during this process

the gas is cooled in order to maintain a constant temperature T C. Work W12 required to compress the gas is shown as the area under the P-V curve, and is

evaluated as follows.

displaced from the cold space to the hot expansion space. No work is done,

however as we shall see below, a significant amount of heat Q R is absorbed by

the gas from the regenerator matrix.

Process 3-4 is the isothermal expansion process. Work W3-4 is done by the

system and is shown as the area under the P-V diagram, while heat Q3-4 is added

to the system from the heat source, maintaining the gas at a constant

temperature TH.

the cycle. Once again we will see below that heat Q R is rejected by the working

gas to the regenerator matrix.

The net work Wnet done over the cycle is given by: Wnet = (W3-4 + W1-2), where the

compression work W1-2 is negative (work done on the system).

We now consider the heat transferred during all four processes, which will allow us to

evaluate the thermal efficiency of the ideal Stirling engine. Recall from the previous

section that in order to do a First Law analysis of an ideal gas to determine the heat

transferred we needed to develop equations to determine the internal energy change u

in terms of the Specific Heat Capacities of an Ideal Gas

The two constant volume processes are formed by holding the piston in a fixed

position, and shuttling the gas between the hot and cold spaces by means of the

displacer. During process 4-1 the hot gas gives up its heat Q R by passing through a

regenerator matrix, which is subsequently completely recovered during the process 23.

We will find in Chapter 5 that this is the maximum theoretical efficiency that is

achievable from a heat engine, and usually referred to as the Carnot efficiency. For

more information on this subject, refer to a paper: A Meeting between Robert

Stirling and Sadi Carnot in 1824 presented at the 2014 ISEC.

Note that if no regenerator is present the heat QR must be supplied by the heater. Thus

the efficiency will be significantly reduced to th = Wnet / (Qin + QR). Furthermore the

cooler will then have to reject the heat that is normally absorbed by the regenerator,

thus the cooling load will be increased to Q out + QR. Recall that Q2-3 = QR = Q4-1.

Note that the practical Stirling cycle has many losses associated with it and does not

really involve isothermal processes, nor ideal regeneration. Furthermore since the

Free-Piston Stirling cycle machines involve sinusoidal motion, the P-V diagram has an

oval shape, rather than the sharp edges defined in the above diagrams. Nevertheless

we use the ideal Stirling cycle to get an initial understanding and appreciation of the

cycle performance.

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

_____________________________________________________________________

_____

One important aspect of Stirling cycle machines that we need to consider is that the

cycle can be reversed - if we put net work into the cycle then it can be used to pump

heat from a low temperature source to a high temperature sink. Sunpower, Inc. has

been actively involved in the deveplopment of Stirling cycle refrigeration systems and

produces Stirling cycle croygenic coolers for liquifying oxygen. In 1984 Sunpower

developed a free piston Duplex Stirling Machine having only three moving parts

including one piston and two displacers, in which a gas fired Stirling cycle engine

powered a Stirling cycle cooler. Global Cooling, Inc was established in 1995 as a

spinoff of Sunpower, and was formed mainly in order to develop free-piston Stirling

cycle coolers for home refrigerator applications. These systems, apart from being

significantly more efficient than regular vapor-compression refrigerators, have the

added advantage of being compact, portable units using helium as the working fluid

(and not the HFC refrigerants such as R134a, having a Global Warming Potential of

1,300). More recently Global Cooling decided to concentrate their development efforts

on systems in which there are virtually no competitive systems - cooling between

-40C and -80C, and they established a new company name: Stirling Ultracold.

We are fortunate to have obtained two original M100B coolers from Global Cooling.

The one is used as a demonstrator unit, and is shown in operation in the following

evaluate the actual performance of the machine under various specified loads and

temperatures.

of Global Cooling) are shown below

two moving parts - a piston and a displacer. The displacer shuttles the working gas

(helium) between the compression and expansion spaces. The phasing between the

piston and displacer is such that when the most of the gas is in the ambient

compression space then the piston compresses the gas while rejecting heat to the

ambient. The displacer then displaces the gas through the regenerator to the cold

expansion space, and then both displacer and piston allow the gas to expand in this

space while absorbing heat at a low temperature.

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Unfortunately the analysis of actual Stirling cycle machines is extremely complex and

requires sophisticated computer analysis. We consider the idealised model of this

cooler defined in terms of the P-V diagram shown below in order to determine the

ideal performance of the M100B under typical operating conditions as described

below. (Note that the values presented here are not actual values of the M100B,

however were devised by your instructor for purposes of this exercise only).

during which heat QC is rejected to the ambient. Process (2)-(3) is the constant volume

displacement process during which heat QR is rejected to the regenerator matrix.

Process (3)-(4) is the isothermal expansion process at temperature T E = 20C, during

which heat QE is absorbed from the freezer, and finally process (4)-(1) is the constant

volume displacement process during which heat Q R is absorbed from the regenerator

matrix. Thus the ideal Stirling cycle consists of four distinct processes, each one of

which can be separately analysed. State (1) is defined at a maximum volume of 35

cm3 and a pressure of 1.9 MPa, and State (2) is defined at a minimum volume of 30

cm3. The energy transferred during both the compression and expansion processes is

indicated on P-V diagrams as follows:

Since the working fluid is helium which is an ideal gas, we use the ideal gas equation

of state throughout. Thus P V = m R T, where R = 2.077 kJ/kg K, and u = Cv T,

where Cv = 3.116 kJ/kg K. (refer: Ideal Gas Properties)

1. Determine the heat absorbed in the expansion space Q E during the expansion

process (3) - (4) (Joules). Determine also the heat power absorbed (Watts). Note that

the cycle frequency is the line frequency (f = 60 Hz). [QE = 8.56J (power = 513.6W)]

2. Determine the net work done per cycle (Joules): W net = WE + WC (Note that the

compression work WC is always negative). Determine also the power supplied to the

linear electric motor (Watts). [Wnet = -1.69J (power = -101W)]

3. Evaluate the Coefficient of Performance of the refrigerator defined as: COP R = QE /

Wnet. (heat absorbed in the expansion space divided by the net work done). [COPR =

5.07]

4. Determine the amount of heat rejected by the working fluid Q R as it passes through

the regenerator matrix during process (2) - (3). [QR = -16.46J (power = -988 W)]

If there were no regenerator present then this heat would need to be removed from the

gas by the expansion process in order to reduce the temperature to the cold

temperature of the freezer. How would this affect the performance of the cooler?

Discuss the importance of an effective regenerator in the Stirling cycle cooler.

Systems

b) Ideal Stirling Cycle Machines (Engines / Coolers)

1. The Stirling Cycle Engine

Conceptually the Stirling engine is the simplest of all heat engines. It has no valves,

and includes an externally heated space and an externally cooled space. It was

invented by Robert Stirling, and an interesting website by Bob Sier includes a

photograph of Robert Stirling, his original patent drawing of 1816, and an animated

model of Stirling's original engine.

In its original single cylinder form the working gas (typically air

or helium) is sealed within its cylinders by the piston and shuttled

between the hot and cold spaces by a displacer. The linkage

driving the piston and displacer will move them such that the gas

will compress while it is mainly in the cool compression space

and expand while in the hot expansion space. This is clearly

illustrated in the adjacent animation which was produced by

Richard Wheeler (Zephyris) of Wikipedia.

Refer also to the animation produced by Matt Keveney in

his Stirling engine animation website. Since the gas is at a

higher temperature, and therefore pressure, during its expansion

than during its compression, more power is produced during

expansion than is reabsorbed during compression, and this net

excess power is the useful output of the engine. Note that there are

no valves or intermittent combustion, which is the major source of

noise in an internal combustion engine. The same working gas is

used over and over again, making the Stirling engine a sealed,

closed cycle system. All that is added to the system is steady high

temperature heat, and all that is removed from the system is low

temperature (waste) heat and mechanical power.

Athens, Ohio, is a hotbed of Stirling cycle machine activity, both engines and coolers,

and includes R&D and manufacturing companies as well as internationally recognized

consultants in the area of Stirling cycle computer analysis. The parent company of this

activity is Sunpower, Inc. It was formed by William Beale in the early 1970's, mainly

based on his invention of the free-piston Stirling engine which we describe

below. Update (Jan. 2013): Sunpower was recently acquired by AMETEK, Inc in

Pensylvania, however continues doing Stirling cycle machine development in Athens,

Ohio. Update (Nov. 2013): Sunpower has recently introduced a 1 kW Stirling

Developers Kit based on a free piston Stirling engine fired by Propane or natural gas.

Some examples of single cylinder Stirling engines: Stirling Technology Inc. is a

spinoff of Sunpower, and was formed in order to continue the development and

manufacture of the 5 kW ST-5 Air engine. This large single cylinder engine burns

biomass fuel (such as sawdust pellets or rice husks) and can function as a cogeneration

unit in rural areas. It is not a free-piston engine, and uses a bell crank mechanism to

obtain the correct displacer phasing. Another important early Stirling engine is

Lehmann's machine on which Gusav Schmidt did the first reasonable analysis of

Stirling engines in 1871. Andy Ross of Columbus, Ohio built a small working replica

of the Lehmann machine, as well as a model air engine.

Solar Heat and Power Cogeneration: With the current energy and global warming

crises, there is renewed interest in renewable energy systems, such as wind and solar

energy, and distributed heat and power cogeneration systems. Cool Energy, Inc of

Boulder, Colorado, is currently in advanced stages of developing a complete solar heat

and power cogeneration system for home usage incorporating Stirling engine

technology for electricity generation. This unique application includes evacuated tube

solar thermal collectors, thermal storage, hot water and space heaters, and a Stirling

engine/generator.

Ideal Analysis: Please note that the following analysis of Stirling cycle engines is

ideal, and is intended only as an example of First Law Analysis of closed systems. In

the real world we cannot expect actual machines to perform any better than 40 - 50%

of the ideal machine. The analysis of actual Stirling cycle machines is extremely

complex and requires sophisticated computer analysis (see for example the course

notes on: Stirling Cycle Machine Analysis.)

The free-piston Stirling engine developed by Sunpower, Inc is unique in that there is

no mechanical connection between the piston and the displacer, thus the correct

phasing between them occurs by use of gas pressure and spring forces. Electrical

power is removed from the engine by permanent magnets attached to the piston

driving a linear alternator. Basically the ideal Stirling engine undergoes 4 distinct

processes, each one of which can be separately analysed, as shown in the P-V diagram

below. We consider first the work done during all four processes.

Process 1-2 is the compression process in which the gas is compressed by the

piston while the displacer is at the top of the cylinder. Thus during this process

the gas is cooled in order to maintain a constant temperature T C. Work W12 required to compress the gas is shown as the area under the P-V curve, and is

evaluated as follows.

displaced from the cold space to the hot expansion space. No work is done,

however as we shall see below, a significant amount of heat Q R is absorbed by

the gas from the regenerator matrix.

Process 3-4 is the isothermal expansion process. Work W3-4 is done by the

system and is shown as the area under the P-V diagram, while heat Q3-4 is added

to the system from the heat source, maintaining the gas at a constant

temperature TH.

the cycle. Once again we will see below that heat Q R is rejected by the working

gas to the regenerator matrix.

The net work Wnet done over the cycle is given by: Wnet = (W3-4 + W1-2), where the

compression work W1-2 is negative (work done on the system).

We now consider the heat transferred during all four processes, which will allow us to

evaluate the thermal efficiency of the ideal Stirling engine. Recall from the previous

section that in order to do a First Law analysis of an ideal gas to determine the heat

transferred we needed to develop equations to determine the internal energy change u

in terms of the Specific Heat Capacities of an Ideal Gas

The two constant volume processes are formed by holding the piston in a fixed

position, and shuttling the gas between the hot and cold spaces by means of the

displacer. During process 4-1 the hot gas gives up its heat Q R by passing through a

regenerator matrix, which is subsequently completely recovered during the process 23.

We will find in Chapter 5 that this is the maximum theoretical efficiency that is

achievable from a heat engine, and usually referred to as the Carnot efficiency. For

more information on this subject, refer to a paper: A Meeting between Robert

Stirling and Sadi Carnot in 1824 presented at the 2014 ISEC.

Note that if no regenerator is present the heat QR must be supplied by the heater. Thus

the efficiency will be significantly reduced to th = Wnet / (Qin + QR). Furthermore the

cooler will then have to reject the heat that is normally absorbed by the regenerator,

thus the cooling load will be increased to Q out + QR. Recall that Q2-3 = QR = Q4-1.

Note that the practical Stirling cycle has many losses associated with it and does not

really involve isothermal processes, nor ideal regeneration. Furthermore since the

Free-Piston Stirling cycle machines involve sinusoidal motion, the P-V diagram has an

oval shape, rather than the sharp edges defined in the above diagrams. Nevertheless

we use the ideal Stirling cycle to get an initial understanding and appreciation of the

cycle performance.

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

_____________________________________________________________________

_____

One important aspect of Stirling cycle machines that we need to consider is that the

cycle can be reversed - if we put net work into the cycle then it can be used to pump

heat from a low temperature source to a high temperature sink. Sunpower, Inc. has

been actively involved in the deveplopment of Stirling cycle refrigeration systems and

produces Stirling cycle croygenic coolers for liquifying oxygen. In 1984 Sunpower

developed a free piston Duplex Stirling Machine having only three moving parts

including one piston and two displacers, in which a gas fired Stirling cycle engine

powered a Stirling cycle cooler. Global Cooling, Inc was established in 1995 as a

spinoff of Sunpower, and was formed mainly in order to develop free-piston Stirling

cycle coolers for home refrigerator applications. These systems, apart from being

significantly more efficient than regular vapor-compression refrigerators, have the

added advantage of being compact, portable units using helium as the working fluid

(and not the HFC refrigerants such as R134a, having a Global Warming Potential of

1,300). More recently Global Cooling decided to concentrate their development efforts

on systems in which there are virtually no competitive systems - cooling between

-40C and -80C, and they established a new company name: Stirling Ultracold.

We are fortunate to have obtained two original M100B coolers from Global Cooling.

The one is used as a demonstrator unit, and is shown in operation in the following

evaluate the actual performance of the machine under various specified loads and

temperatures.

of Global Cooling) are shown below

two moving parts - a piston and a displacer. The displacer shuttles the working gas

(helium) between the compression and expansion spaces. The phasing between the

piston and displacer is such that when the most of the gas is in the ambient

compression space then the piston compresses the gas while rejecting heat to the

ambient. The displacer then displaces the gas through the regenerator to the cold

expansion space, and then both displacer and piston allow the gas to expand in this

space while absorbing heat at a low temperature.

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Unfortunately the analysis of actual Stirling cycle machines is extremely complex and

requires sophisticated computer analysis. We consider the idealised model of this

cooler defined in terms of the P-V diagram shown below in order to determine the

ideal performance of the M100B under typical operating conditions as described

below. (Note that the values presented here are not actual values of the M100B,

however were devised by your instructor for purposes of this exercise only).

during which heat QC is rejected to the ambient. Process (2)-(3) is the constant volume

displacement process during which heat QR is rejected to the regenerator matrix.

Process (3)-(4) is the isothermal expansion process at temperature T E = 20C, during

which heat QE is absorbed from the freezer, and finally process (4)-(1) is the constant

volume displacement process during which heat Q R is absorbed from the regenerator

matrix. Thus the ideal Stirling cycle consists of four distinct processes, each one of

which can be separately analysed. State (1) is defined at a maximum volume of 35

cm3 and a pressure of 1.9 MPa, and State (2) is defined at a minimum volume of 30

cm3. The energy transferred during both the compression and expansion processes is

indicated on P-V diagrams as follows:

Since the working fluid is helium which is an ideal gas, we use the ideal gas equation

of state throughout. Thus P V = m R T, where R = 2.077 kJ/kg K, and u = Cv T,

where Cv = 3.116 kJ/kg K. (refer: Ideal Gas Properties)

1. Determine the heat absorbed in the expansion space Q E during the expansion

process (3) - (4) (Joules). Determine also the heat power absorbed (Watts). Note that

the cycle frequency is the line frequency (f = 60 Hz). [QE = 8.56J (power = 513.6W)]

2. Determine the net work done per cycle (Joules): W net = WE + WC (Note that the

compression work WC is always negative). Determine also the power supplied to the

linear electric motor (Watts). [Wnet = -1.69J (power = -101W)]

3. Evaluate the Coefficient of Performance of the refrigerator defined as: COP R = QE /

Wnet. (heat absorbed in the expansion space divided by the net work done). [COPR =

5.07]

4. Determine the amount of heat rejected by the working fluid Q R as it passes through

the regenerator matrix during process (2) - (3). [QR = -16.46J (power = -988 W)]

If there were no regenerator present then this heat would need to be removed from the

gas by the expansion process in order to reduce the temperature to the cold

temperature of the freezer. How would this affect the performance of the cooler?

Discuss the importance of an effective regenerator in the Stirling cycle cooler.

Systems

c) The Air-Standard Diesel Cycle (Compression-Ignition)

Engine

The Air Standard Diesel cycle is the ideal cycle for Compression-Ignition (CI)

reciprocating engines, first proposed by Rudolph Diesel over 100 years ago. The

following link by the Kruse Technology Partnership describes the four-stroke diesel

cycleoperation including a short history of Rudolf Diesel. The four-stroke diesel

engine is usually used in motor vehicle systems, whereas larger marine systems

usually use the two-stroke diesel cycle. Once again we have an excellent animation

produced by Matt Keveney presenting the operation of the four-stroke diesel cycle.

The actual CI cycle is extremely complex, thus in initial analysis we use an ideal "airstandard" assumption, in which the working fluid is a fixed mass of air undergoing the

complete cycle which is treated throughout as an ideal gas. All processes are ideal,

combustion is replaced by heat addition to the air, and exhaust is replaced by a heat

rejection process which restores the air to the initial state.

The ideal air-standard diesel engine undergoes 4 distinct processes, each one of which

can be separately analysed, as shown in the P-V diagrams below. Two of the four

processes of the cycle are adiabatic processes (adiabatic = no transfer of heat), thus

before we can continue we need to develop equations for an ideal gas adiabatic

process as follows:

The Adiabatic Process of an Ideal Gas (Q = 0)

The analysis results in the following three general forms representing an adiabatic

process:

where k is the ratio of heat capacities and has a nominal value of 1.4 at 300K for air.

Process 1-2 is the adiabatic compression process. Thus the temperature of the air

increases during the compression process, and with a large compression ratio (usually

> 16:1) it will reach the ignition temperature of the injected fuel. Thus given the

conditions at state 1 and the compression ratio of the engine, in order to determine the

pressure and temperature at state 2 (at the end of the adiabatic compression process)

we have:

Work W1-2 required to compress the gas is shown as the area under the P-V curve, and

is evaluated as follows.

An alternative approach using the energy equation takes advantage of the adiabatic

process (Q1-2 = 0) results in a much simpler process:

approach)

During process 2-3 the fuel is injected and combusted and this is represented by a

constant pressure expansion process. At state 3 ("fuel cutoff") the expansion process

continues adiabatically with the temperature decreasing until the expansion is

complete.

Process 3-4 is thus the adiabatic expansion process. The total expansion work is W exp =

(W2-3 + W3-4) and is shown as the area under the P-V diagram and is analysed as

follows:

Finally, process 4-1 represents the constant volume heat rejection process. In an actual

Diesel engine the gas is simply exhausted from the cylinder and a fresh charge of air is

introduced.

The net work Wnet done over the cycle is given by: Wnet = (Wexp + W1-2), where as

before the compression work W1-2 is negative (work done on the system).

In the Air-Standard Diesel cycle engine the heat input Q in occurs by combusting the

fuel which is injected in a controlled manner, ideally resulting in a constant pressure

expansion process 2-3 as shown below. At maximum volume (bottom dead center) the

burnt gasses are simply exhausted and replaced by a fresh charge of air. This is

represented by the equivalent constant volume heat rejection process Q out = Q4-1. Both

processes are analyzed as follows:

At this stage we can conveniently determine the engine efficiency in terms of the heat

flow as follows:

_____________________________________________________________________

_____

kPa and 27C. The air is now compressed slowly according to the relation P Vk =

constant, where k = 1.4, until it reaches a final temperature of 77C.

a) Sketch the P-V diagram of the process with respect to the relevant constant

temperature lines, and indicate the work done on this diagram.

b) Using the basic definition of boundary work done determine the

boundary work done during the process [-7.18 kJ].

c) Using the energy equation determine the heat transferred during the

process [0 kJ], and verify that the process is in fact adiabatic.

Derive all equations used starting with the basic energy equation for a non-flow

system, the equation for internal energy change for an ideal gas (u), the basic

equation for boundary work done, and the ideal gas equation of state [P.V = m.R.T].

Use values of specific heat capacity defined at 300K for the entire process.

Problem 3.5 - Consider the expansion stroke only of a typical Air Standard Diesel

cycle engine which has a compression ratio of 20 and a cutoff ratio of 2. At the

beginning of the process (fuel injection) the initial temperature is 627C, and the air

expands at a constant pressure of 6.2 MPa until cutoff (volume ratio 2:1).

Subsequently the air expands adiabatically (no heat transfer) until it reaches the

maximum volume.

a) Sketch this process on a P-v diagram showing clearly all three states. Indicate

on the diagram the total work done during the entire expansion process.

b) Determine the temperatures reached at the end of the constant pressure (fuel

injection) process [1800K], as well as at the end of the expansion

process [830K], and draw the three relevant constant temperature lines on

the P-v diagram.

c) Determine the total work done during the expansion stroke [1087 kJ/kg].

d) Determine the total heat supplied to the air during the expansion stroke [1028

kJ/kg].

Derive all equations used starting from the ideal gas equation of state and adiabatic

process relations, the basic energy equation for a closed system, the internal energy

and enthalpy change relations for an ideal gas, and the basic definition of boundary

work done by a system (if required). Use the specific heat values defined at 1000K for

the entire expansion process, obtained from the table of Specific Heat Capacities of

Air.

compression ratio of 18 and a cutoff ratio of 2. At the beginning of the compression

process, the working fluid is at 100 kPa, 27C (300 K). Determine the temperature and

pressure of the air at the end of each process, the net work output per cycle [kJ/kg],

and the thermal efficiency.

Note that the nominal specific heat capacity values used for air at 300K are C P = 1.00

kJ/kg.K, Cv = 0.717 kJ/kg.K,, and k = 1.4. However they are all functions of

temperature, and with the extremely high temperature range experienced in Diesel

engines one can obtain significant errors. One approach (that we will adopt in this

example) is to use a typical average temperature throughout the cycle.

Solution Approach:

The first step is to draw a diagram representing the problem, including all the relevant

information. We notice that neither volume nor mass is given, hence the diagram and

solution will be in terms of specific quantities. The most useful diagram for a heat

engine is the P-v diagram of the complete cycle:

The next step is to define the working fluid and decide on the basic equations or tables

to use. In this case the working fluid is air, and we have decided to use an average

temperature of 900K throughout the cycle to define the specific heat capacity values as

presented in the table of Specific Heat Capacities of Air.

We now go through all four processes in order to determine the temperature and

pressure at the end of each process.

Note that an alternative method of evaluating pressure P 2 is to simply use the ideal gas

equation of state, as follows:

Either approach is satisfactory - choose whichever you are more comfortable with. We

now continue with the fuel injection constant pressure process:

Notice that even though the problem requests "net work output per cycle" we have

only calculated the heat in and heat out. In the case of a Diesel engine it is much

simpler to evaluate the heat values, and we can easily obtain the net work from the

energy balance over a complete cycle, as follows:

You may wonder at the unrealistically high thermal efficiency obtained. In this

idealized analysis we have ignored many loss effects that exist in practical heat

engines. We will begin to understand some of these loss mechanisms when we study

the Second Law in Chapter 5.

_____________________________________________________________________

_________

On to Part d) of The First Law - Otto Cycle Engines

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

Systems

d) The Air-Standard Otto Cycle (Spark-Ignition) Engine

The Air Standard Otto cycle is the ideal cycle for Spark-Ignition (SI) internal

combustion engines, first proposed by Nikolaus Otto over 130 years ago, and which is

currently used most motor vehicles. The following link by the Kruse Technology

a short history of Nikolaus Otto. Once again we have excellent animations produced

by Matt Keveney presenting both the four-stroke and the two-stroke spark-ignition

internal combustion engine engine operation

The analysis of the Otto cycle is very similar to that of the Diesel cycle which we

analysed in the previous section. We will use the ideal "air-standard" assumption in

our analysis. Thus the working fluid is a fixed mass of air undergoing the complete

cycle which is treated throughout as an ideal gas. All processes are ideal, combustion

is replaced by heat addition to the air, and exhaust is replaced by a heat rejection

process which restores the air to the initial state.

The most significant difference between the ideal Otto cycle and the ideal Diesel cycle

is the method of igniting the fuel-air mixture. Recall that in the ideal Diesel cycle the

extremely high compression ratio (around 18:1) allows the air to reach the ignition

temperature of the fuel. The fuel is then injected such that the ignition process occurs

at a constant pressure. In the ideal Otto cycle the fuel-air mixture is introduced during

the induction stroke and compressed to a much lower compression ratio (around 8:1)

and is then ignited by a spark. The combustion results in a sudden jump in pressure

while the volume remains essentially constant. The continuation of the cycle including

the expansion and exhaust processes are essentially identical to that of the ideal Diesel

cycle. We find it convenient to develop the analysis approach of the ideal Otto cycle

through the following solved problem:

compression ratio of 8. At the beginning of the compression process, the working fluid

is at 100 kPa, 27C (300 K), and 800 kJ/kg heat is supplied during the constant volume

heat addition process. Neatly sketch the pressure-volume [P-v] diagram for this cycle,

and using the specific heat values for air at a typical average cycle temperaure of 900K

determine:

a) the temperature and pressure of the air at the end of each process

b) the net work output/cycle [kj/kg], and

c) the thermal efficiency [th] of this engine cycle.

Solution Approach:

The first step is to draw the P-v diagram of the complete cycle, including all the

relevant information. We notice that neither volume nor mass have been provided,

hence the diagram and solution will be in terms of specific quantities.

We assume that the fuel-air mixture is represented by pure air. The relevant equations

of state, internal energy and adiabatic process for air follow:

We recall from the previous section that the nominal specific heat capacity values used

for air at 300K are Cv = 0.717 kJ/kg.K,, and k = 1.4. However they are all functions of

temperature, and with the extremely high temperature range experienced in internal

combustion engines one can obtain significant errors. In this problem we use a typical

average cycle temperature of 900K taken from the table of Specific Heat Capacities

of Air.

We now go through all four processes in order to determine the temperature and

pressure at the end of each process, as well as the work done and heat transferred

during each process.

Note that the pressure P4 (as well as P2 above) could also be evaluated from the

adiabatic process equation. We do so below as a vailidity check, however we find it

more convenient to use the ideal gas equation of state wherever possible. Either

method is satisfactory.

Notice that we have applied the energy equation to all four processes allowing us two

alternative means of evaluating the "net work output per cycle" and the thermal

efficiency, as follows:

Note that using constant specific heat values over the cycle we can determine the

thermal efficiency directly from the ratio of specific heat capacities k with the

following formula:

Quick Quiz: Using the heat and work energy equations derived above, derive this

relation

use throughout all four processes the nominal standard specific heat capacity values

for air at 300K. Using the values Cv = 0.717 kJ/kg.K, and k = 1.4, determine:

a) the temperature and pressure of the air at the end of each process [P2 = 1838

kPa, T2 = 689K, T3 = 1805K, P3 = 4815 kPa, P4 = 262 kPa, T4 = 786K]

b) the net work output/cycle [451.5 kJ/kg], and

c) the thermal efficiency of this engine cycle. [th = 56%]

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

for Control Volumes

Chapter 4: The First Law of Thermodynamics for Control Volumes

a) The Energy Equation for Control Volumes

In this course we consider three types of Control Volume Systems - Steam Power

Plants, Refrigeration Systems, and Aircraft Jet Engines. Fortunately we will be able to

separately analyse each component of the system independent of the entire system,

which is typically represented as follows:

In addition to the energy flow across the control volume boundary in the form of heat

and work, we will also have mass flowing into and out of the control volume. We will

only consider Steady Flow conditions throughout, in which there is no energy or mass

accumulation in the control volume, thus we will find it convenient to derive the

energy equation in terms of power [kW] rather than energy [kJ]. Furthermore the term

Control Volume indicates that there is no boundary work done by the system, and

typically we have shaft work, such as with a turbine, compressor or pump.

Mass Flow

volume, having an area A, volume dV, length dx, and an average steady velocity , as

follows.

Flow Energy

The fluid mass flows through the inlet and exit ports of the control volume

accompanied by its energy. These include four types of energy - internal energy (u),

kinetic enegy (ke), potential energy (pe), and flow work (w flow). In order to evaluate the

flow work consider the following exit port schematic showing the fluid doing work

against the surroundings through an imaginary piston:

It is of interest that the specific flow work is simply defined by the pressure P

multiplied by the specific volume v. In the following section we can now develop the

complete energy equation for a control volume.

The Complete Energy Equation for a Control Volume

Consider the control volume shown in the following figure. Under steady flow

conditions there is no mass or energy accumulation in the control volume thus the

mass flow rate applies both to the inlet and outlet ports. Furthermore with a constant

mass flow rate, it is more convenient to develop the energy equation in terms of power

[kW] rather than energy [kJ] as was done previously.

The total power in due to heat and mass flow through the inlet port (1) must equal the

total power out due to work and mass flow through the outlet port (2), thus:

The specific energy e can include kinetic and potential energy, however will always

include the combination of internal energy (u) and flow work (Pv), thus we

conveniently combine these properties in terms of the property enthalpy (as was done

in Chapter 3a), as follows:

Note that z is the height of the port above some datum level [m] and g is the

acceleration due to gravity [9.81 m/s2]. Substituting for energy e in the above energy

equation and simplifying, we obtain the final form of the energy equation for a singleinlet single-outlet steady flow control volume as follows:

Notice that enthalpy h is fundamental to the energy equation for a control volume.

The Pressure-Enthalpy (P-h) Diagram

When dealing with closed systems we found that sketching T-v or P-v diagrams was a

significant aid in describing and understanding the various processes. In steady flow

systems we find that the Pressure-Enthalpy (P-h) diagrams serve a similar purpose,

and we will use them extensively. In this course we consider three pure fluids - water,

refrigerant R134a, and carbon dioxide, and we have provided P-h diagrams for all

three in the Property Tables section. We will illustrate their use in the following

examples. TheP-h diagram for water is shown below. Study it carefully and try to

understand the significance of the distinctive shapes of the constant temperature

curves in the compressed liquid, saturated mixture (quality region) and superheated

vapor regions.

_____________________________________________________________________

_________

On to Part b) of Control Volumes - Steam Power Plants

On to Part c) of Control Volumes - Refrigerators and Heat Pumps

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

a) The Energy Equation for Control Volumes

In this course we consider three types of Control Volume Systems - Steam Power

Plants, Refrigeration Systems, and Aircraft Jet Engines. Fortunately we will be able to

separately analyse each component of the system independent of the entire system,

which is typically represented as follows:

In addition to the energy flow across the control volume boundary in the form of heat

and work, we will also have mass flowing into and out of the control volume. We will

only consider Steady Flow conditions throughout, in which there is no energy or mass

accumulation in the control volume, thus we will find it convenient to derive the

energy equation in terms of power [kW] rather than energy [kJ]. Furthermore the term

Control Volume indicates that there is no boundary work done by the system, and

typically we have shaft work, such as with a turbine, compressor or pump.

Mass Flow

volume, having an area A, volume dV, length dx, and an average steady velocity , as

follows.

Flow Energy

The fluid mass flows through the inlet and exit ports of the control volume

accompanied by its energy. These include four types of energy - internal energy (u),

kinetic enegy (ke), potential energy (pe), and flow work (w flow). In order to evaluate the

flow work consider the following exit port schematic showing the fluid doing work

against the surroundings through an imaginary piston:

It is of interest that the specific flow work is simply defined by the pressure P

multiplied by the specific volume v. In the following section we can now develop the

complete energy equation for a control volume.

The Complete Energy Equation for a Control Volume

Consider the control volume shown in the following figure. Under steady flow

conditions there is no mass or energy accumulation in the control volume thus the

mass flow rate applies both to the inlet and outlet ports. Furthermore with a constant

mass flow rate, it is more convenient to develop the energy equation in terms of power

[kW] rather than energy [kJ] as was done previously.

The total power in due to heat and mass flow through the inlet port (1) must equal the

total power out due to work and mass flow through the outlet port (2), thus:

The specific energy e can include kinetic and potential energy, however will always

include the combination of internal energy (u) and flow work (Pv), thus we

conveniently combine these properties in terms of the property enthalpy (as was done

in Chapter 3a), as follows:

Note that z is the height of the port above some datum level [m] and g is the

acceleration due to gravity [9.81 m/s2]. Substituting for energy e in the above energy

equation and simplifying, we obtain the final form of the energy equation for a singleinlet single-outlet steady flow control volume as follows:

Notice that enthalpy h is fundamental to the energy equation for a control volume.

The Pressure-Enthalpy (P-h) Diagram

When dealing with closed systems we found that sketching T-v or P-v diagrams was a

significant aid in describing and understanding the various processes. In steady flow

systems we find that the Pressure-Enthalpy (P-h) diagrams serve a similar purpose,

and we will use them extensively. In this course we consider three pure fluids - water,

refrigerant R134a, and carbon dioxide, and we have provided P-h diagrams for all

three in the Property Tables section. We will illustrate their use in the following

examples. TheP-h diagram for water is shown below. Study it carefully and try to

understand the significance of the distinctive shapes of the constant temperature

curves in the compressed liquid, saturated mixture (quality region) and superheated

vapor regions.

_____________________________________________________________________

_________

On to Part b) of Control Volumes - Steam Power Plants

On to Part c) of Control Volumes - Refrigerators and Heat Pumps

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

Volumes

c) Refrigerators and Heat Pumps

Introduction and Discussion

In the early days of refrigeration the two refrigerants in common use were ammonia

and carbon dioxide. Both were problematic - ammonia is toxic and carbon dioxide

requires extremely high presures (from around 30 to 200 atmospheres!) to operate in a

refrigeration cycle, and since it operates on a transcritical cycle the compressor outlet

temperature is extremely high (around 160C). When Freon 12 (dichloro-diflouromethane) was discovered it totally took over as the refrigerant of choice. It is an

extremely stable, non toxic fluid, which does not interact with the compressor

lubricant, and operates at pressures always somewhat higher than atmospheric, so that

if any leakage occured, air would not leak into the system, thus one could recharge

without having to apply vacuum.

Unfortunately when the refrigerant does ultimately leak and make its way up to the

ozone layer the ultraviolet radiation breaks up the molecule releasing the highly active

chlorine radicals, which help to deplete the ozone layer. Freon 12 has since been

banned from usage on a global scale, and has been essentially replaced by chlorine

free R134a (tetraflouro-ethane) - not as stable as Freon 12, however it does not have

ozone depletion characteristics.

Recently, however, the international scientific consensus is that Global Warming is

caused by human energy related activity, and various man made substances are defined

on the basis of a Global Warming Potential (GWP) with reference to carbon dioxide

(GWP=1). R134a has been found to have a GWP of 1300 and in Europe, within a few

years, automobile air conditioning systems will be barred from using R134a as a

refrigerant.

The new hot topic is a return to carbon dioxide (R744) as a refrigerant (refer for

example to the website: R744.com). The previous two major problems of high

pressure and high compressor temperature are found in fact to be advantageous. The

very high cycle pressure results in a high fluid density throughout the cycle, allowing

miniturization of the systems for the same heat pumping power requirements.

Furthermore the high outlet temperature will allow instant defrosting of automobile

windshields (we don't have to wait until the car engine warms up) and can be used for

combined space heating and hot water heating in home usage (refer for

example: Norwegian IEA Heatpump Program Annex28.

In this chapter we cover the vapor-compression refrigeration cycle using refrigerant

R134a, and will defer coverage of the carbon dioxide cycle to Chapter 9.

Unlike the situation with steam power plants it is common practice to begin the design

and analysis of refrigeration and heat pump systems by first plotting the cycle on

the P-h diagram.

The following schematic shows a basic refrigeration or heat pump system with typical

property values. Since no mass flow rate of the refrigerant has been provided, the

entire analysis is done in terms of specific energy values. Notice that the same system

can be used either for a refrigerator or air conditioner, in which the heat absorbed in

the evaporator (qevap) is the desired output, or for a heat pump, in which the heat

rejected in the condenser (qcond) is the desired output.

Heat absorbed by the evaporator (qevap) [kJ/kg]

Heat rejected by the condenser (qcond) [kJ/kg]

Work done to drive the compressor (wcomp) [kJ/kg]

Coefficient of Performance (COP) of the system, either as a refrigerator or as a

heat pump.

As with the Steam Power Plant, we find that we can solve each component of this

system separately and independently of all the other components, always using the

same approach and the same basic equations. We first use the information given in the

above schematic to plot the four processes (1)-(2)-(3)-(4)-(1) on the P-h diagram.

Notice that the fluid entering and exiting the condenser (State (2) to State (3)) is at the

high pressure 1 MPa. The fluid enters the evaporator at State (4) as a saturated mixture

at -20C and exits the evaporator at State (1) as a saturated vapor. State (2) is given by

the intersection of 1 MPa and 70C in the superheated region. State (3) is seen to be in

the subcooled liquid region at 30C, since the saturation temperature at 1 MPa is about

40C. The process (3)-(4) is a vertical line (h 3 = h4) as is discussed below.

In the following section we develop the methods of evaluating the solution of this

example using the R134a refrigerant tables. Notice that the refrigerant tables do not

include the subcooled region, however since the constant temperature line in this

region is essentially vertical, we use the saturated liquid value of enthalpy at that

temperature.

Notice from the P-h diagram plot how we can get an instant visual appreciation of the

system performance, in particular the Coefficient of Performance of the system by

comparing the enthalpy difference of the compressor (1)-(2) to that of the evaporator

(4)-(1) in the case of a refrigerator, or to that of the condenser (2)-(3) in the case of a

heat pump.

We now consider each component as a separate control volume and apply the energy

equation, starting with the compressor. Notice that we have assumed that the kinetic

and potential energy change of the fluid is negligeable, and that the compressor is

adiabatic. The required values of enthalpy for the inlet and outlet ports are determined

from the R134a refrigerant tables.

The high pressure superheated refrigerant at port (2) is now directed to a condenser in

which heat is extracted from the refrigerant, allowing it to reach the subcooled liquid

region at port (3). This is shown on the following diagram of the condenser:

The throttle is simply an expansion valve which is adiabatic and does no work,

however enables a significant reduction in temperature of the refrigerant as shown in

the following diagram:

The final component is the evaporator, which extracts heat from the surroundings at

the low temperature allowing the refrigerant liquid and vapor mixture to reach the

saturated vapor state at station (1).

desired output is the evaporator heat absorbed, and for a heat pump the desired output

is the heat rejected by the condenser which is used to heat the home. The required

input in both cases is the work done on the compressor (ie the electricity bill). Thus

COPR = qevap / wcomp = 145 / 65.5 = 2.2

COPHP = qcond / wcomp = 210 / 65.5 = 3.2

Notice that for the same system we always find that COP HP = COPR + 1.

Notice also that the COP values are usually greater than 1, which is the reason why

they are never referred to as "Efficiency" values, which always have a maximum of

100%.

Thus the P-h diagram is a widely used and very useful tool for doing an approximate

evaluation of a refrigerator or heat pump system. In fact, in the official Reference

Handbook supplied by the NCEES to be used in the Fundamentals of Engineering

exam, only the P-h diagram is presented for R134a. You are expected to answer all the

questions on this subject based on plotting the cycle on this diagram as shown above.

_____________________________________________________________________

__

Heat Exchanger

Problem 4.9 - Home Air Conditioner and Hot Water Heating System

Problem 4.10 - A Novel Water/Steam Air Conditioner

Problem 4.11 - A Home Geothermal Heat-Pump

Problem 4.12 - Home Air Conditioner and Hot Water System with an

Internal Heat Exchanger

Problem 4.14 - The BSU Geothermal Heat Pump System (Wintertime)

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

In this chapter we consider a more abstract approach to heat engine, refrigerator and

heat pump cycles, in an attempt to determine if they are feasible, and to obtain the

limiting maximum performance available for these cycles. The concept of mechanical

and thermal reversibility is central to the analysis, leading to the ideal Carnot cycles.

(Refer to Wikipedia: Sadi Carnot a French physicist, mathematician and engineer

who gave the first successful account of heat engines, the Carnot cycle, and laid the

foundations of the second law of thermodynamics). For more information on this

subject, refer to a paper: A Meeting between Robert Stirling and Sadi Carnot in

1824 presented at the 2014 ISEC.

We represent a heat engine and a heat pump cycle in a minimalist abstract format as in

the following diagrams. In both cases there are two temperature reservoirs TH and TL,

with TH > TL.

In the case of a heat engine heat QH is extracted from the high temperature source TH,

part of that heat is converted to work W done on the surroundings, and the rest is

rejected to the low temperature sink TL. The opposite occurs for a heat pump, in

which work W is done on the system in order to extract heat QL from the low

temperature source TL and "pump" it to the high temperature sink TH. Notice that the

thickness of the line represents the amount of heat or work energy transferred.

We now present two statements of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, the first

regarding a heat engine, and the second regarding a heat pump. Neither of these

statements can be proved, however have never been observed to be violated.

The Kelvin-Planck Statement: It is impossible to construct a device which operates

on a cycle and produces no other effect than the transfer of heat from a single body in

order to produce work.

We prefer a less formal description of this statement in terms of a boat extracting heat

from the ocean in order to produce its required propulsion work:

cycle and produces no other effect than the transfer of heat from a cooler body to a

hotter body.

It is remarkable that the two above statements of the Second Law are in fact

equivalent. In order to demonstrate their equivalence consider the following diagram.

On the left we see a heat pump which violates the Clausius statement by pumping heat

QL from the low temperature reservoir to the high temperature reservoir without any

work input. On the right we see a heat engine rejecting heat QL to the low temperature

reservoir.

If we now connect the two devices as shown below such that the heat rejected by the

heat engine QL is simply pumped back to the high temperature reservoir then there

will be no need for a low temperature reservoir, resulting in a heat engine which

violates the Kelvin-Planck statement by extracting heat from a single heat source and

converting it directly into work.

Notice that the statements on the Second Law are negative statements in that they only

describe what is impossible to achieve. In order to determine the maximum

performance available from a heat engine or a heat pump we need to introduce the

concept ofReversibilty, including both mechanical and thermal reversibility. We will

attempt to clarify these concepts in terms of the following example of a reversible

piston cylinder device in thermal equilibrium with the surroundings at temperature T0,

and undergoing a cyclic compression/expansion process.

also require that the process is a quasi-equilibrium one. In the diagram we notice that

during compression the gas particles closest to the piston will be at a higher pressure

than those farther away, thus the piston will be doing more compression work than it

would do if we had waited for equilibrium conditions to occur after each incremental

step. Similarly, thermal reversibility requires that all heat transfer is isothermal. Thus if

there is an incremental rise in temperature due to compression then we need to wait

until thermal equilibrium is established. During expansion the incremental fall in

temperature will result in heat being transferred from the surroundings to the system

until equilibrium is established.

In summary, there are three conditions required for reversible operation:

All mechanical processes are frictionless.

At each incremental step in the process thermal and pressure equilibrium

conditions are established.

All heat transfer processes are isothermal.

Carnot's Theorem

Carnot's theorem, also known as Carnot's rule, or the Carnot principle, can be stated as

follows:

No heat engine operating between two heat reservoirs can be more efficient than

a reversible heat engine operating between the same two reservoirs.

The simplest way to prove this theorem is to consider the scenario shown below, in

which we have an irreversible engine as well as a reversible engine operating between

the reservoirs TH and TL, however the irreversible heat engine has a higher efficiency

than the reversible one. They both draw the same amount of heat QH from the high

temperature reservoir, however the irreversible engine produces more work WI than

that of the reversible engine WR.

Note that the reversible engine by its nature can operate in reverse, ie if we use some

of the work output (WR) from the irreversible engine in order to drive the reversible

engine then it will operate as a heat pump, transferring heat QH to the high

temperature reservoir, as shown in the following diagram:

Notice that the high temperature reservoir becomes redundent, and we end up drawing

a net amount of heat (QLR - QLI) from the low temperature reservoir in order to

produce a net amount of work (WI - WR) - a Kelvin-Planck violator - thus proving

Carnot's Theorem.

Corollary 1 of Carnot's Theorem:

The first Corollary of Carnot's theorem can be stated as follows:

All reversible heat engines operating between the same two heat reservoirs must

have the same efficiency.

Thus regardless of the type of heat engine, the working fluid, or any other factor if the

heat engine is reversible, then it must have the same maximum efficiency. If this is not

the case then we can drive the reversible engine with the lower efficiency as a heat

pump and produce a Kelvin-Planck violater as above.

Corollary 2 of Carnot's Theorem:

The second Corollary of Carnot's theorem can be stated as follows:

The efficiency of a reversible heat engine is a function only of the respective

temperatures of the hot and cold reservoirs. It can be evaluated by replacing the

ratio of heat transfers QL and QH by the ratio of temperatures TL and TH of the

respective heat reservoirs.

Thus using this corollary we can evaluate the thermal efficiency of a reversible heat

engine as follows:

Notice that we always go into "meditation mode" before replacing the ratio of heats

with the ratio of absolute temperatures, which is only valid for reversible machines.

The simplest conceptual example of a reversible heat engine is the Carnot cycle

engine, as described in the following diagram:

Obviously a totally impractical engine which cannot be realized in practice, since for

each of the four processes in the cycle the surrounding environment needs to be

changed from isothermal to adiabatic. A more practical example is the ideal Stirling

cycle engine as described in the following diagram:

This engine has a piston for compression and expansion work as well as a displacer in

order to shuttle the working gas between the hot and cold spaces, and was described

previously in Chapter 3b. Note that under the same conditions of temperatures and

compression ratio the ideal Carnot engine has the same efficiency however a

significantly lower net work output per cycle than the Ideal Stirling cycle engine, as

can be easily seen in the following diagram:

refrigerator. The coefficient of Performance of these machines is developed as follows:

_____________________________________________________________________

___

Solved Problem 5.1 - Reversible Home Air Conditioner and Hot Water

Heater

_____________________________________________________________________

___

Problem 5.2 - A heat pump is used to meet the heating requirements of a house

and maintain it at 20C. On a day when the outdoor air temperature drops to -10C it

is estimated that the house looses heat at the rate of 10 kW. Under these conditions the

actual Coefficient of Performance (COPHP) of the heat pump is 2.5.

a) Draw a diagram representing the heat pump system showing the flow of

energy and the temperatures, and determine:

b) the actual power consumed by the heat pump [4 kW]

c) the power that would be consumed by a reversible heat pump under these

conditions [1.02 kW]

d) the power that would be consumed by an electric resistance heater under

these conditions [10 kW]

e) Comparing the actual heat pump to the reversible heat pump determine if the

performance of the actual heat pump is feasible,

Derive all equations used starting from the basic definition of COPHP.

_____________________________________________________________________

___

measured that a Stirling cycle refrigerator that draws 250W of power has removed

1000kJ of heat from the refrigerated space maintained at -30C. The running time of

the refrigerator during the experiment was 20min. Draw a diagram representing the

refrigerator system showing the flow of energy and the temperatures, and determine if

these measurements are reasonable [COPR = 3.33, COPR,rev = 4.42, ratio

COPR/COPR,rev = 75% > 60% - not feasible]. State the reasons for your

conclusions. Derive all equations used starting from the basic definition of the

Coefficient of Performance of a refrigerator (COPR).

_____________________________________________________________________

___

On to Chapter 6: Entropy - A New Property

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

a) Defining and Evaluating Entropy

Following on the Second Law developed in Chapter 5 we consider the Clausius

Inequality which leads to the definition of a new property Entropy (S - kJ / K) as

follows:

differential format as the reversible heat transfer divided by the temperature. In an

attempt to try and understand it we rewrite the definition as follows:

follows:

Thus it begins to make sense. Work done requires both a driving force (pressure

P) and movement (volume change dV). We implicitly evaluated the work done for

reversible processes - always neglecting friction or any other irreversibility. Similarly

we can state that heat transfer requires both a driving force (temperature T) and some

equivalent form of "movement" (entropy change dS). Since temperature can be

considered as represented by the vibration of the molecules, it is this transfer of

vibrational energy that we define as entropy.

We now continue with the Increase in Entropy Principle which is also derived from

the Clausius Inequality, and states that for any process, the total change in entropy of a

system or control volume together with its enclosing adiabatic surroundings is always

greater than or equal to zero. This total change of entropy is denoted the Entropy

Generated during the process (Sgen [kJ/K] or sgen [kJ/kg.K]. For reversible processes

the entropy generated will always be zero.

We use the differential form of the energy equation to derive the T.ds relations which

can be used to evaluate the change of entropy (s) for processes involving 2-phase

fluids (Steam, R134a, CO2), solids or liquids, or ideal gasses.

Finally we present a convenient Entropy Equation Summary Sheet which

summarises the relevant relations concerning entropy generation and evaluation of

entropy change s. The Isentropic Processes Summary Sheet extends the relations

of entropy change to enable the evaluation of isentropic processes.

efficiency of various adiabatic components. These include turbines, compressors and

aircraft jet nozzles. Thus we have made the statement that steam turbines are designed

to be adiabatic, and that any heat loss from the turbine will result in a reduction in

output power, however only now can we make the statement that the ideal turbine is

isentropic. This enables us to evaluate the Adiabatic Efficiency (sometimes referred

to as isentropic efficiency) of these components, and we extend the isentropic process

sheet with an Adiabatic Efficiency Summary Sheet.

There are two property diagrams involving entropy in common usage, the

temperature-entropy (T-s) and enthalpy-entropy (h-s) "Mollier" diagrams. We will find

that the h-s diagram is extremely useful for evaluating adiabatic turbines and

compressors, and complements the P-h diagram which we used in Chapter 4 to

evaluate entire steam power plants or refrigerator systems. The h-s diagram for steam

is presented below:

The important characteristic of the h_s diagram is that the ideal adiabatic turbine can

be conveniently plotted as a vertical line, allowing an intuitive visual appreciation of

the turbine performance. We define the turbine adiabatic efficiency as follows:

Notice that for the for the actual turbine there will always be an increase in entropy,

which means that the turbine adiabatic efficiency will always be less than 100%.

Consider an adiabatic steam turbine having a turbine adiabatic efficiency T = 80%,

operating under the conditions shown in the following diagram:

Using steam tables, determine the enthalpy and entropy values at station (1)

and station (2s) assuming that the turbine is isentropic. [h1 = 3479 kJ/kg, s1 =

7.764 kJ/kg.K; h2s = 2461 kJ/kg, s2s = s1]

From the definition of turbine adiabatic efficiency (shown on the diagram), and

given that T = 80%, determine the actual enthalpy and entropy values as well

as the temperature at station (2a). [h2a = 2665 kJ/kg, s2a = 8.38 kJ/kg.K, T2a =

88C]

Plot the actual and isentropic turbine processes (Stations (1)-(2a) and (1)-(2s))

on the enthalpy-entropy h-s "Mollier" diagram, and indicate the actual turbine

specific work (wa) as well as the isentropic turbine specific work (w s) on the

diagram.

Determine the actual power output of the turbine (kW). [1629 kW]

The h-s diagram plot follows. Notice that we have indicated all the enthalpy and

entropy values (which we determined from the steam tables) on the plot. This allows a

check on the feasibility of our results.

for Athens, Ohio

problem.

Unfortunately we find that at supercritical pressures and temperatures > 100C, liquid

water no longer behaves as an incompressible liquid, as in the following:

Plant Feedwater Pump

One of the interesting aspects of compressors is that they can be made more efficient

by cooling. The reason why we still consider the adiabatic efficiency of compressors

that are normally found in refrigeration, air-condition and heat pump systems is that it

is considered to be impractical to cool them. Thus the ideal compressor (absorbing a

minimum of power) is considered to be isentropic, and we define compressor adiabatic

efficiency as follows:

useful for evaluating adiabatic compressors that are normally found in refrigeration,

air-condition and heat pump systems.

4.7 concerning a home refrigerator, and examining it's performance before and

after adding an internal heat exchanger.

o a) Plot the actual and the isentropic compressor processes on

the enthalpy-entropy (h-s) diagram provided, for both cases - with and

without the internal heat exchanger.

o b) Using the R134a tables determine the actual compressor adiabatic

efficiency (C) for both cases [75%, 76%]

4.9 concerning an innovative home air conditioner and hot water heating

system, in which we determined the COP for both the air conditioning and the

water heating systems. Do sections a) and b) specified in Problem 6.7 above on

the compressor of this home air conditioning system. [C = 76%]

Compressor

We will also extend the h-s diagram into the ideal gas region and use it to advantage

when we consider gas turbine and jet engine systems in Part b) that follows.

On to Part b) of Entropy - Aircraft Gas Turbune Engines

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

generation (sometimes referred to as entropy production), entropy evaluation and

isentropic processes.

Adiabatic Efficiencies of Turbines, Compressors, Nozzles

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

This summary sheet is an extension of the Entropy Equation Summary Sheet and

covers the relevant relations concerning isentropic processes.

Note that these relations are identical to those that we developed previously for

the Adiabatic Process of an Ideal Gas, which we used in Chapter 3c to analyze the

adiabatic compression and expansion processes of an air-standard Diesel cycle engine.

Adiabatic Efficiencies of Turbines, Compressors, Nozzles

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

This summary sheet is an extension of the Isentropic Process Summary Sheet and

defines the adiabatic (isentropic) efficiency of turbines, compressors, and nozzles.

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

Thermodynamics

Chapter 7: Exergy - Maximum Available Work Potential

a) Reversible Work, Irreversibility and Second Law

Efficiency

In this Section we combine the First and Second Laws of thermodynamics in an

attempt to determine theoretical limits of performance of various thermodynamic

components and systems. Thus we introduce the concept

of Exergy (aka Availability) - defined as the maximum work potential of a system or

component at a given state in a specified environment. The environment is crucial in

this definition since once the system or component has reached total thermodynamic

equilibrium with its environment, and has used up all of its potential and kinetic

energy relative to that environment, it is said to be in the Dead State. The environment

is usually specified in terms of pressure and temperature as P 0 = 1 atmosphere. T0 =

25C (77F). In the following we attempt to introduce the concepts in terms of various

examples.

This very intuitive first example defines the theoretical maximum available power

from a wind generator as that which occurs when the kinetic energy of the air passing

through the turbine rotor is reduced to zero. Clearly this is impractical, and in an

interesting discussion of wind power on Wikipedia we find that Betz's Law imposes

a theoretical limit of 59.3% of this maximum available power when the wind velocity

is reduced by 1/3 while passing through the turbine rotor, and in fact the actual energy

usage is much less.

An interesting application of wind power generation for home usage is the project

of Dr Greg Kremer of the ME department at Ohio University. He has combined wind

and solar power with battery backup connected to the electrical grid in his home.

Using the conditions defining Dr. Kremer's wind turbine system (rotor diameter

3.53m) we determine the availability of his system as follows:

where:

Notice the dependence on the cube of the wind velocity. The average annual wind

velocity in Athens, Ohio is 7mph (3.11m/s) giving a maximum available power of only

174W. However during the winter months (when the solar energy is lower) the

velocity reaches 22.5mph (10m/s) giving a maximum available power of 5.79kW!

Thus the wind/solar combination system seems like a compatible match, and so far Dr.

Kremer has found that his net electrical power usage from the grid is negative! (His

system feeds energy into the grid).

Our second example is that of hydroelectric power generation due to potential energy.

Unlike wind power as described above, all of the available potential energy can be

converted directly into work. Our favorite example is that of the Shoshone Hydro

power plant in Glenwood Canyon, Colorado. A delightful description of this power

plant is presented in Glenwood Canyon: An I-70 Odyssey by Matthew E Salek. The

unique aspect of this plant is that unlike traditional plants which have the dam located

at the same location, the Shoshone dam is located two miles upstream, and the water

flows through a tunnel in the wall of the canyon to the power plant. At the power plant

the water exits the Canyon wall and drops to the hydroelectric turbines to generate

power.

where:

The Shoshone plant can provide up to 15MW power, which is enough power for about

15,000 households.

In our third example we do an exergy analysis of a single-inlet single-outlet steadyflow control volume and define and evaluate the various concepts used. We have

ignored kinetic and potential energy terms which simply directly contribute to the

exergy as needed. We find it convenient to do the development in terms of specific

quantities (by dividing throughout by the mass flow).

Exergy Analysis: we first eliminate q from equations (1) and (2) as follows:

Notice in equation (3) that we have defined reversible work (w rev) as that in which no

entropy is generated. We thus define a new term Irreversibility (irrev) as follows:

Thus from equation (3), when the irreversibility irrev = 0, the resulting Reversible

Work is given by:

We now define the Second Law Efficiency (II) for either a work producing or a work

absorbing device as follows:

The Exergy (or Availability) of the working fluid at either the inlet or the outlet

port is defined as the maximum available work when the state of that working fluid is

reduced to the Dead State 0, thus:

Notice that on referring to the Control Volume diagram above, the reversible work

equation (5) can be written in terms of the inlet (i) and outlet (e) states as follows:

Thus the Reversible Work of the control volume can also be defined in terms of the

difference in exergy between the inlet and exit ports, thus:

equivalent system in which we use the heat transfer between the system and the

surroundings in order to obtain reversible work.

However this reversible work wHE is a function of the temperature T of the control

volume, which can vary significantly between the inlet state (i) and the outlet state (e).

Thus we will need to sum the work output of an infinite number of elemental

reversible heat engines, as shown in the equivalent diagram which follows:

This analysis was first presented to me by the late Gary Graham (of Ohio University)

in 1995. Thus:

Note: the following two problems are extensions of Solved Problem 6.10 in which we

did an ideal analysis of the T700 helicopter gas turbine. In solving these problems you

should derive all equations used starting from the basic energy equation for a flow

system, the enthalpy difference (h) for an ideal gas, the equation for entropy

generated (sgen) and entropy change (s) for an ideal gas, and the exergy equations for

reversible work (wrev) and Second Law efficiency (II). Use values of Specific Heat

Capacity (CP) at the average temperature of each process, which are obtained from the

table of Specific Heat Capacities of Air.

Problem 7.2 - Recall Solved Problem 6.10 in which we did an ideal analysis of

the T700 helicopter gas turbine. In this problem we wish to do a Second Law analysis

of the compressor only of this gas turbine. Assume that air enters the compressor at

100kPa and 27C and exits at 1500kPa and 427C, with 40 kJ/kg of heat cooling

transferred to the surroundings at 25C. Determine the actual work (from the energy

equation) [-451.6 kJ/kg], the reversible work (from an exergy analysis) [-383.4 kJ/kg],

and the Second Law Efficiency (II) [85%] of this compressor.

Problem 7.3 - Recall again Solved Problem 6.10 in which we did an ideal

analysis of the T700 helicopter gas turbine. In this problem we wish to do a Second

Law analysis of the turbine which is required to drive the compressor of a gas turbine

engine. Assume that the gas leaving the combustion chamber enters the turbine at 1500

kPa and and 927C and exits at 400 kPa and 627C, with 50 kJ/kg of heat loss

transferred to the surroundings at 25C. Assuming that the gas is pure air, determine

a) the actual work output (from the energy equation) [292.6 kJ/kg],

b) the entropy generated by this process [0.22 kJ/kg.K],

c) the available reversible work output (from an exergy analysis) [357.5 kJ/kg],

and

Exergy Analysis of an Air Nozzle

On to Section b) of Exergy Analysis - Adiabatic Control Volumes

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

One may wonder at the purpose of determining the maximum available work potential

of a nozzle, whose entire purpose is to maximise the kinetic energy at the exit state (2).

Indeed, a perfect nozzle is isentropic, and has no work potential, since any work done

would decrease the kinetic energy. In a practical nozzle there could be an increase in

entropy from state (1) to state (2) as well as possible heat loss to the surroundings

which will decrease the kinetic energy output and thus the exergy analysis is mainly in

order to evaluate this lost kinetic energy potential, or the irreversibility. We recall

that kinetic energy is entirely equivalent to exergy.

follows:

However, since there is no actual work done in the nozzle, we have from the energy

equation:

Once again, in order to get an intuitive understanding of this analysis we consider the

following equivalent nozzle in which we wish to capture the heat loss over the entire

nozzle by means of summing the work output of an infinite number of elemental

reversible heat engines.

The reason for the many elemental reversible heat engines is that the temperature T of

the nozzle varies continuously between the inlet state (1) and the outlet state (2), thus:

However, since there is no actual work done in the nozzle, we have from the energy

equation:

Since there is no actual work done, the irreversibility can be determined as follows:

Note that this equation is identical to that for the irreversibility given above.

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

b) Adiabatic Control Volumes

Examples of Determining the Reversible Work, Irreversibility, and Second Law

Efficiency for Adiabatic Control Volumes

of the exergy equations developed in the previous section, by considering reversible

equivalent circuits of some common adiabatic components. We repeat equations (3),

(4) and (5) developed in Chapter 7a on the exergy analysis of a control volume.

Note that the reversible work wrev will either be the maximum available output work

for work producing devices, or the minimum possible input work (negative value) for

work absorbing devices.

We now consider the Energy and Entropy Generation equations for adiabatic

components (q = 0):

Applying all the above analysis to evaluating the Second Law Efficiencies ( II) of

adiabatic work absorbing and work producing components we obtain:

Compressor

We now apply the above Second Law analysis to an adiabatic refrigeration

compressor. We wish to determine the minimum work wC rev required to drive the

compressor between the inlet state (1) and the exit state (2). Note that the isentropic

compression that we evaluated in Chapter 6 will not provide the answer, since state

(2s) is not the same as the actual state (2).

The above equations are in fact correct however we have difficulty in understanding

their significance. In examining the adiabatic compressor above we cannot understand

why the environment (dead space) temperature T0 features so prominently in the

equations, when in fact there seems to be no obvious interaction between the adiabatic

compressor and the environment. Note that as far as the adiabatic compressor is

concerned we will assume that the surroundings temperature T 0 is equal to the exit

temperature.

In an attempt to find some intuitive meaning to these equations we consider a

reversible system having the same inlet and exit states as our actual compressor. This

comprises a three component system consisting of an inlet heat exchanger, a reversible

heat engine and an isentropic compressor as shown below:

A typical h-s diagram for this system is shown below, in which we have used typical

inlet conditions of 140kPa, -10C and exit conditions of 700kPa, 60C. The reversible

heat engine will provide extra work to drive the compressor, absorbing its heat from

the environment temperature T0 while rejecting heat to the heat exchanger. The exit

state (2) from the heat exchanger has been chosen such that the compression process

(2) - (3) will be isentropic.

We now derive the exergy equations for the three component system above, and

consider first the heat engine. Since the temperature T of the heat exchanger varies

from the inlet temperature T1 to the outlet temperature T2, we use the differential

energy equation form for the reversible heat engine.

Since T0 is constant, this equation can be integrated from the inlet state (1) to the outlet

state (2), leading to:

This familiar final form was to be expected. The net minimum work required to drive

the compressor is thus:determined as follows:

Notice that this result is identical to that shown above for the actual adiabatic

compressor, since we added the heat exchanger, thus state (3) is in fact equivalent to

the original state (2).

Problem 7.4 - Recall Solved Problem 6.5 in which we evaluated the Adiabatic

Efficiency (C) of a refrigeration compressor, and determined it to be 92%. Redo this

problem and determine the Second Law Efficiency ( II) of this compressor. [92%]

We now apply the above Second Law Analysis to an adiabatic steam turbine. We wish

to determine the maximum available turbine work output w T rev between the inlet state

(1) and the exit state (2). We will then be able to determine the second law eficiency

by comparing the actual work output to the reversible (maximum available) work

output as follows:

consider a reversible system having the same inlet and exit states as the actual turbine,

comprising an isentropic turbine, a heat pump pumping heat from the surroundings to

the heat exchanger in the exit stream. Note that as far as the adiabatic turbine is

concerned we will assume that the surroundings temperature T 0 is equal to the exit

temperature.

The h-s diagram for this system is shown below, in which we have chosen as an

example a steam turbine having inlet conditions 6MPa, 600C, and outlet conditions

50kPa, 100C.

Notice from the h-s diagram that the heat exchanger temperature varies from the

saturation temperature at 50 kPa (81C) to 100C at state (3). In order to accommodate

that change we develop the differential form of the heat pump as follows:

Since T0 is constant, this differential equation can be integrated from state (2) to state

(3).

We can then subtract the work provided to the heat pump from the output work of the

turbine leading to the final form of the maximum available work, as follows:

Notice that this result is identical to that shown in the box above for the actual

adiabatic turbine, since state (3) is in fact equivalent to the original state (2).

Problem 7.5 - Recall Solved Problem 6.1 in which we evaluated the Adiabatic

Efficiencies (T) of both the High Pressure and the Low Pressure steam turbines of the

supercritical steam power plantand found them to be 77% and 90% respectively. Redo

this problem and determine the respective Second Law Efficiencies ( II) of both

turbines. [77%, 90%]

On to Section c) - Exergy by Heat Transfer from a Thermal Source to a Control

Volume

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

c) Heat Transfer to a Control Volume

Consider the Control Volume as developed in Section a), however with the heat being

transferred from a thermal source at temperature TH which is higher than the

surroundings temperature T0.

Since heat is exchanged with a temperature source different from the dead space

temperature T0 the entropy generated is:

We now consider a reversible process between the same inlet (i) and exit (e) states

and heat transfer q. This requires that reversible heat transfer q 0,rev will occur from the

surroundings to the control volume such that the entropy generated s gen = 0.

Thus:

Adding this new reversible heat source to the energy equation (1) above, and

substituting equation (9) we obtain:

You may be confused as to how we can justify transferring heat q 0 reversibly from the

surroundings at T0 to the control volume at a higher temperature. This unique approach

due to Sonntag and Borgnakke (Introduction to Engineering Thermodynamics, Wiley,

2001) is done for convenience in order to validate the derivation of equation (10).

In order to justify this, consider the equivalent system shown below, in which the hot

source at TH is used as the heat source of a reversible heat engine, which in turn drives

a heat pump to deliver the required heat q to the control volume. We will show that

this system gives rise to the identical equation (10) as above.

From the energy equation for the reversible heat engine (recall Chapter 5) we have:

From the diagram we see that some of this work (w HP) is used to drive the reversible

heat pump. Since the temperature T of the control volume varies from the inlet to the

outlet, we consider the differential energy equation for the work into the heat pump:

From the diagram above we see that the total reversible work available from this

system is given by:

Substituting from equations (11), (12) and the initial energy equation (1) above, we

have:

Simplifying equation (13) leads to equation (10) as above - QED. (Quad Erat

Demonstratum - Latin for "which was to be proved" used smugly by math gurus

whenever they successfully conclude a proof - usually accompanied by a

condescending smile)

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

a) Ideal Rankine and Reheat Cycles

We introduced the basic Steam Power Plant in Chapter 4b, however we could only

evaluate the turbine and feedwater pump after we introduced the concept of entropy

in Chapter 6a. In this Chapter we will consider ideal steam power cycles including

isentropic turbines and pumps. This will allow us to determine the maximum

performance of these systems, and evaluate the influence of various components on

this performance.

The pressure-enthalpy (P-h) diagram

The common method of describing steam power plant systems is by plotting them on

a T-s (temperature-entropy) diagram for steam. This is done exclusively in all

thermodynamic text books that I have evaluated over many years. We find this

approach cumbersome, non-intuitive and even incorrect in the description of feedwater

pumps. We will make exclusive use of P-h (pressure-enthalpy) diagrams (which we

inroduced in Chapter 4b) to describe the various steam power systems and we will

require that all problems to be solved should first be drawn on the P-h diagram.

A typical P-h diagram for steam is shown below. One aspect of the diagram that we

have ignored until now are the various constant entropy lines drawn in the superheated

and high quality section of the diagram. We will use these lines to indicate the path of

an isentropic turbine for the ideal cycles described below. We do not require this for

the feedwater pumps since, as we determined in Chapter 6a, the isentropic pump

follows the constant temperature line.

Cycle

This is shown below as an Ideal Rankine cycle, which is the simplest of the steam

power cycles. We have specifically split the turbine into a High Pressure (HP) turbine

and a Low Pressure (LP) turbine since it is impractical for a single turbine to expand

from 15MPa to 10kPa.

As stated above, our approach is that prior to doing any analysis we will always first

sketch the complete cycle on a P-h diagram based exclusively on the pressure and

temperature data presented, as follows:

Notice that since both turbines are considered ideal, they follow the isentropic curve

(1)-(2). From the P-h diagram we see that the LP turbine output (station (2)) has a

quality of 80%. This is unacceptable. The condensed water will cause erosion of the

turbine blades, and we should always try to maintain a quality of above 90%. One

example of the effects of this erosion can be seen on the blade tips of the final stage of

the Gavin LP turbine. During 2000, all four LP turbines needed to be replaced

because of the reduced performance resulting from this erosion.

Thus once we have determined from the P-h diagram that this cycle is impractical we

have no reason to continue with the analysis, and prefer to extend this into an Ideal

Reheat steam power cycle as follows.

We extend the above example to the more practical Ideal Reheat cycle as shown

below. In this example the HP turbine expands the steam from 15 MPa to 1 MPa, and

the steam is subsequently reheated back to 600C before being expanded in the LP

turbine to 10 kPa.

Again we plot this cycle on the P-h diagram and compare it to the previous situation of

no reheat, as shown below:

We notice that reheating the output of the HP turbine back to 600C (process (2)-(3))

allows both significantly more power output as well as increasing the quality at the LP

turbine output (4) to 98%.

The method of analysis is similar to that developed in Chapter 4b, in which we

consider each component as a separate control volume.

1) Assuming both turbines are isentropic (adiabatic and reversible), and

neglecting kinetic energy effects we use the steam tables to determine the

combined work output of both turbines.

Furthermore, since the suction temperature of the water is 46C, we assume that

it behaves as an incompressible liquid, even at 15 MPa. Recall from Chapter

4b where we derived theenergy equation for an incompressible liquid.

3) The total heat transfer to the boiler, including the reheat system:

4) The thermal efficiency of the ideal Rankine reheat system, defined as the net

work done (turbines, pump) divided by the total heat supplied to the boiler:

Notice that we could have also determined the thermal efficiency by the simpler

method of evaluating the condenser heat transferred to the cooling water, thus:

This is an excellent check and should always be done to validate your answer. The

reason why we have preferred to evaluate the output power directly is that it is the

primary purpose of a steam power plant, thus we are always interested in the various

components (turbines, pumps) that directly influence its value. Thermal efficiency is

important in its own right, however only on condition that we can satisfy the output

power requirements of the steam power plant.

On to Section b) of Steam Power Cycles

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

b) Regenerative Cycles - Open and Closed Feedwater Heaters

One approach to increasing the efficiency of steam power cycle is by extracting some

of the steam from various stages of the turbine and using it to preheat the compressed

liquid before it enters the boiler. This is done either by direct mixing of the fluids

(Open Feedwater Heater) or through a heat exchanger (Closed Feedwater Heater), In

many practical steam power plants various combinations of open and closed feedwater

heaters are used, and systems using them are generally referred to as Regenerative

Cycles.

We continue with the Reheat cycle developed in Chapter 8a and examine the

performance effects of adding open and closed feedwater heaters.

Feedwater Heater

We continue with the Reheat cycle developed in Chapter 8a, and examine the effect

of adding a regenerative heat exchanger in the form of an Open Feedwater Heater, as

shown below. We will find that this system does result in an increase in thermal

efficiency by preheating the water before it enters the boiler, however at the expense

of a reduced power output. In the schematic diagram we notice that many of the state

and enthalpy values (indicated in red) have already been evaluated in Chapter 8a. The

mass fraction of the steam bled at the outlet of the HP turbine (2) as well as the state

and enthalpy values at stations (6) through (9) will be evaluated below.

For this example we have chosen the mixture pressure of the open feedwater heater as

200kPa. Notice that a portion of the steam is bled off the outlet of the HP turbine at a

pressure of 1MPa, passed through a throttling valve reducing its pressure to 200kPa,

and then mixed with the compressed liquid (also at 200kPa), ultimately resulting in

saturated liquid at station (8). We first need to determine the mass flow fraction y of

the bled steam required to bring the output of the open feedwater heater (8) to a

saturated liquid state.

Notice that the work output is reduced by having bled off a fraction y of the steam, and

the boiler heat input is reduced by the increased temperature of the compressed liquid

entering the boiler T9. Thus:

We always confirm our results by the alternate evaluation of efficiency using the heat

flow out from the condenser to the cooling water:

Thus we see a slight increase in efficiency and reduction in power compared to the

reheat system that we solved in Chapter 8a (45%, 1910 kJ/kg). Can we justify this

added complexity for such a small gain in efficiency? This was discussed in Solved

Problem 4.2 in which we noted that a de-aerator is a necessary vital component of a

steam power plant with a condenser pressure of 10 kPa - air leaking into the system

causes corrosion as well as a reduction in performance. The open feedwater heater

naturally includes a de-aerator. On a previous visit to the Gavin power plant we were

informed that the open feedwater heater can also conveniently include a liquid water

storage tank which enables the feedwater pump to be the main power control of the

system by varying the mass flow rate of the steam. We were also informed that using a

single feedwater pump to increase the water pressure from 10 kPa to 15 MPa is

impractical, and in the Gavin power plant, in addition to the condensate pump there is

a booster pump to bring the pressure from 10 kPa to the de-aerator pressure.

Problem 8.1 - A 10 MPa Steam Power Plant with an Open Feedwater Heater

Problem 8.2 - A Cogeneration Steam Power Plant with an Open Feedwater

Heater

_____________________________________________________________________

___

Feedwater Heater

We again extend the Reheat cycle developed in Chapter 8a, and examine the effect of

adding a regenerative heat exchanger in the form of a Closed Feedwater Heater, as

shown below. We have not included an open feedwater heater even though we learned

in the previous example that it is a necessary component of a high pressure steam

cycle, since we are using this example to develop the techniques for analyzing closed

feedwater heaters. The various state values shown on the schematic (in red) have been

evaluated in previous sections.

From the schematic diagram we see that a portion of the steam is bled off from the

output of the HP turbine at state (2), and then used to heat the high pressure liquid,

ultimately condensing to a subcooled liquid at state (8). A finite temperature difference

is a necessary condition for heat transfer to occur, and from the temperature

distribution plot shown above we see that the closed feedwater heater behaves as a

counterflow heat exhanger, in which the compressed liquid water entering at state (6)

is heated to the saturation temperature of the bled steam (T sat@1MPa = 180C). In typical

closed feedwater heaters (such as those used at the Gavin Power Plant) there are three

distinct zones of heat transfer as shown in the simplified schematic diagram below:

The bled steam first enters the desuperheating zone enclosure and is cooled while

raising the temperature of the feedwater leaving the heater to a level approaching or

equal to the steam saturation temperature. The condensing zone is the largest heat

transfer region within the heater shell. The major portion of heat transfer takes place

here as the steam condenses and gives up its latent heat. The subcooling zone, which

is enclosed in a separate shrouded area within the shell, further cools the condensed

steam while heating the incoming feedwater. The following photograph shows one of

the seven sets of closed feedwater heaters used in the Gavin Power Plant Typically we

find that the subcooled liquid is reduced to within around 4C to 6C above the

incoming feedwater temperature.

The P-h diagram plot of this system follows, and we notice on the diagram that the

high pressure feedwater is heated from state (6) to state (7) before entering the boiler,

while a mass fraction y of the bled steam is cooled from the HP turbine outlet state (2)

to a subcooled liquid at state (8). The subcooled liquid is then passed through a

throttling valve before being returned to the condenser at state (9). As we have learned

from our studies of refrigerators, a throttling valve is simply represented on the Ph diagram by a vertical line, since from the energy equation we find that h 8 equals h9.

We consider first the evaluation of the mass flow fraction y, which is bled from the

output of the HP turbine on order to heat the compressed water at state (8) to the

saturation temperature of the steam at station (2):

Once again we notice that the work output is reduced by having bled off a fraction y of

the steam, and the boiler heat input is reduced by the increased temperature of the

compressed liquid entering the boiler T7. Thus:

The alternative evaluation of thermal efficiency using the heat transfer from the

condenser to the cooling water:

Notice that the thermal efficiency is slightly more than that of the previous example

with an open feedwater heater, however with even less power output. In practice one

normally finds a combination of open and closed feedwater heaters, and in the Gavin

power plant there are seven closed feedwater heaters and one de-aerator/open

feedwater heater. In the following section we develop the analysis technique of this

type of system.

Problem 8.3 - A Reheat Steam Power Plant with a Closed Feedwater Heater

_____________________________________________________________________

___

and a Closed Feedwater Heater

In a practical power plant one may find various combinations of closed and open

feedwater heaters. For example the Gavin Power Plant has one open- and 7 closedfeedwater heaters in each of the two sections of the plant (refer to the Case Study at

the end of this section). In the following example we have chosen one open and one

closed feedwater heaters in order to illustrate the method of analysis, however the

same approach will apply to any combination of feedwater heaters.

Once again we evaluate the required mass flow fractions y 1 and y2 of the bled steam in

order to bring the compressed water at the entrance to the boiler (state (10)) to the

correct state. An enthalpy inventory and energy balance on both the closed and open

feedwater heaters leads to the following:

The resultant net work output and heat input now become:

And finally we obtain the thermal efficiency of the overall system as follows:

As always, we check this result against the equivalent method of considering only heat

in and heat rejected in the condenser to the cooling water

Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

Plant

Background - The General James M. Gavin Plant's units 1 and 2 are

identical, each with a generating capacity of 1300 MW. Unit 1 was completed in 1974

and Unit 2 was completed the following year. With a total generating capacity of 2,600

MW, Gavin Plant ranks as the largest generating station in the state of Ohio. It is

located along the Ohio River at Cheshire, Ohio, and has an average daily coal

consumption of 25,000 tons at full capacity. The coal arrives by barge and is stored in

the plant's coal yard. Conveyer belts carry the coal from the yard into the plant where

pulverizers grind the coal into a fine, talcum powder-like consistency. The powdered

coal is injected into the steam generator where it is burned at high temperature

providing the heat power

which drives the power plant.

Gavin Plant is extremely complex. There are six turbines on two separate parallel

shafts, each driving a hydrogen cooled electrical generator producing 26,000 volts.

Transformers outside the plant building step up this voltage to 765,000 volts so that it

can be transmitted efficiently over a long distance. The high pressure (HP)

turbine drives one shaft together with low pressure (LP) turbines A and B, and the

intermediate pressure (Reheat) turbine drives the second shaft together with LP

turbines C and D. The following represents a much simplified schematic diagram for

purposes of doing an initial analysis of the system. Some of the state values shown

were not available and represent estimates on the part of your instructor in order to

enable a complete analysis.

Notice that the feedwater pump is driven by a separate 65,000HP turbine

(FPT) which taps some of the steam from the outlet of the reheat turbine, returning the

steam to the condenser hotwell. The feedwater pump pressurizes the water to 30 MPa,

however the pressure at the HP turbine inlet drops to 25 MPa since the steam has had

to pass through 350 miles of piping in the steam generator. The flow control valve

together with the speed control of the feedwater pump enables control of output power

matching it to the demand.

The system has four low pressure closed feedwater heaters, one open feedwater

heater / de-aerator, and three high pressure closed feedwater heaters.

As always, prior to doing any analysis we always first sketch the complete cycle on

a P-h diagram based on the data provided in the system diagram. This leads to the

following diagram:

Notice from the P-h diagram how the three high pressure closed feedwater heaters

progressively heat the steam from state (10) to state (11), thus the steam generator is

only required to heat the steam from state (11) to state (1) leading to an increase in

thermal efficiency. Similarly the four low pressure closed feedwater heaters

progressively raise the temperature of the liquid from state (7) to state (8), thus

reducing the fractional amount of steam required (y5) in order to raise the temperature

of the liquid from state (8) to state (9). It is true that as we draw off steam from the

turbines for all the heaters, we reduce the output power accordingly, however the net

effect of this process is to increase the overall thermal efficiency of the system.

One important consideration is the choice of the state (5) at the outlet of the low

pressure turbines. The quality (x = 0.93) shown on the flow diagram is not a

measurable quantity, and the identical pressure and temperature conditions exist

throughout the quality region. The only guide that we have is the knowledge that

steam turbine adiabatic efficiencies vary between 85% and 90%, thus in order to

ensure that we are choosing reasonable state values we plot all three turbines on the

companion h-s diagram indicating both the isentropic as well as the actual processes

on the diagram as follows:

Thus from the diagram we determined that the choice of quality x = 0.93 brought us

into the correct efficiency range. This is an extremely critical choice, since by

choosing a quality that is too low can lead to erosion of the turbine blades and a

reduction of performance. One example of the effects of this erosion can be seen on

the blade tips of the final stage of the Gavin LP turbine. During 2000, all four LP

turbines needed to be replaced because of the reduced performance resulting from this

erosion. (Refer:Tour of the Gavin Power Plant - Feb. 2000)

We now do an enthalpy inventory of the known state points on the cycle using either

the Steam Tables or more conveniently directly from the NIST Chemistry

WebBook (avoiding the need for interpolation), leading to the following table:

State

1

2

3

4

Position

HP turbine inlet

HP turbine outlet

Reheat turbine inlet

LP turbine inlet

Enthalpy h [kJ/kg]

h1 = h25MPa, 550C = 3330 [kJ/kg]

h2 = h5MPa, 300C = 2926 [kJ/kg]

h3 = h4.5MPa, 550C = 3556 [kJ/kg]

h4 = h800kPa, 350C = 3162 [kJ/kg]

5

6

7

9

10

LP turbine outlet

(quality region)

Hotwell outlet

(subcooled liquid)

Condensate Pump outlet

Open Feedwater Heater

(saturated liquid)

Feedwater Pump outlet

(compressed liquid)

hf = 192 [kJ/kg], hg = 2584 [kJ/kg] =>

h5 = 2417 [kJ/kg]

h6 = hf@40C = 168 [kJ/kg]

h7 = h6 = 168 [kJ/kg]

T9 = Tsat@800kPa = 170C

h9 = hf@800kPa = 721 [kJ/kg]

T10 =T9+5C = 175C

h10 = h30MPa, 175C = 756 [kJ/kg]

(Compressed liquid)

Note: State points (8) and (11) result respectively from the low- and high-pressure

closed feedwater heaters and are evaluated below. Notice that the temperature T 10 is

5C higher than the temperature T9. Normally we consider liquid water to be

incompressible, thus pumping it to a higher pressure does not result in an increase of

its temperature. However on a recent visit to the Gavin Power Plant we discovered that

at 30MPa pressure and more than 100C, water is no longer incompressible, and

compression will always result in a temperature increase of up to 7C. We cannot use

the simple incompressible liquid formula to determine pump work, however need to

evaluate the difference in enthalpy from the Compressed Liquid Water tables,

leading to the enthalpy h10 shown in the table.

Finally, do not forget that all values of enthalpy obtained should be checked for

validity against the above P-h and h-s diagrams.

Analysis - We need to determine the mass fractions of all the feedwater heaters

yi as well as that drawn off for the feedwater pump turbine, in order to evaluate the

heat input and the total power output of the system. We find it convenient to separate

the system into a high pressure section including the HP and Reheat turbines, and a

low pressure section including the two LP turbine sets. Using the techniques of

enthalpy balance on the open and closed feedwater heaters developed in Chapter 8b,

we obtain the mass fraction equations of the high pressure section as summarized in

the following diagram.

In order to enable evaluation of the enthalpies at the various state points in the diagram

we estimated the various intermediate temperature values at the turbine taps from the

above P-h and h-s diagrams. The closed feedwater heaters are all of type counterflow

heat exchangers, and we make the assumption that the outlet temperature equals the

saturation temperature of the respective turbine tap, and that the drain temperature is

5C above the inlet temperature value. The resulting enthalpy inventory of the

intermediate state points follows:

State

Position

Enthalpy h [kJ/kg]

Closed

Feedwater

11

Heater #8

outlet

Closed

Feedwater

f7

Heater #7

outlet

Closed

d8 Feedwater

Heater #8 drain

Closed

Feedwater

f6

Heater #6

outlet

Closed

d7 Feedwater

Heater #7 drain

Reheat Turbine

t6

tap

Closed

d6 Feedwater

Heater #6 drain

h11 = h30MPa, 295C = 1304 [kJ/kg]

hf7 = h30MPa, 264C = 1154 [kJ/kg]

Td8 = Tf7+5C = 269C

hd8 = h8MPa, 269C = 1179 [kJ/kg]

Tf6 = Tsat@2MPa = 212C

hf6 = h30MPa, 212C = 918 [kJ/kg]

Td7 = Tf6+5C = 217C

hd7 = h5MPa, 217C = 931 [kJ/kg]

ht6 = h2MPa, 450C = 3358 [kJ/kg]

Td6 = T10+5C = 180C

hd6 = h2MPa, 180C = 764 [kJ/kg]

The resultant fractional mass flow rates to the high pressure heat exchanger section

follows:

Mass flow path

HP Turbine tap t8 to Closed Feedwater

Heater #8

HP Turbine outlet 2 to Closed Feedwater

Heater #7

Reheat Turbine tap t6 to Closed Feedwater

Heater #6

Reheat Turbine outlet 4 to Open Feedwater

State

conditions

Fractional mass

flow

8MPa, 350C

y8 = 0.083

5MPa, 300C

y7 = 0.108

2MPa, 450C

y6 = 0.050

Heater #5

Similar to the high pressure section above we obtain the mass fraction equations for

the low pressure section as summarized in the following diagram:

The enthalpy inventory of the intermediate state points indicated on the above diagram

follows:

State

t4

8

t3

f3

d4

t2

f2

d3

t1

f1

d2

d1

Position

LP A&C Turbine

tap

Closed Feedwater

Heater #4 outlet

LP B&D Turbine

tap

Closed Feedwater

Heater #3 outlet

Closed Feedwater

Heater #4 drain

LP A&C Turbine

tap

Closed Feedwater

Heater #2 outlet

Closed Feedwater

Heater #3 drain

LP B&D Turbine

tap

Closed Feedwater

Heater #1 outlet

Closed Feedwater

Heater #2 drain

Closed Feedwater

Heater #1 drain

Enthalpy h [kJ/kg]

ht4 = h450kPa, 280C = 3025 [kJ/kg]

T8 = Tsat@450kPa = 148C

h8 = h800kPa, 148C = 624 [kJ/kg]

ht3 = h250kPa, 220C = 2909 [kJ/kg]

Tf3 = Tsat@250kPa = 127C

hf3 = h800kPa, 127C = 534 [kJ/kg]

Td4 = Tf3+5C = 132C

hd4 = h450kPa, 132C = 555 [kJ/kg]

ht2 = h100kPa, 120C = 2717 [kJ/kg]

Tf2 = Tsat@100kPa = 100C

hf2 = h800kPa, 100C = 420 [kJ/kg]

Td3 = Tf2+5C = 105C

hd7 = h250kPa, 105C = 440 [kJ/kg]

ht1 = h40kPa, quality X=0.98 = hf+X.(hfg)

hf = 318 [kJ/kg], hfg = 2319 [kJ/kg] => ht1 = 2590

[kJ/kg]

Tf1 = Tsat@40kPa = 76C

hf1 = h800kPa, 76C = 319 [kJ/kg]

Td2 = Tf1+5C = 81C

hd2 = h100kPa, 81C = 339 [kJ/kg]

Td1 = T6+5C = 45C

hd1 = h40kPa, 45C = hf@45C = 188 [kJ/kg]

The resulting fractional mass flow rates to the low pressure heat exchanger section

follows:

Mass flow path

Reheat Turbine outlet 4 to Feedwater Pump

Turbine (mass fraction 65,4[kg/s]/1234[kg/s])

State

conditions

Fractional

mass flow

LP TurbineB&D tap t3 to Heater #3

LP TurbineA&C tap t2 to Heater #2

LP TurbineB&D tap t1 to Heater #1

450kPa, 280C

250kPa, 220C

100kPa, 120C

40kPa, quality

X=0.98

y4 = 0.027

y3 = 0.033

y2 = 0.029

y1 = 0.041

From the above diagrams, an energy equation balance on the various components of

the system leads to the following equations for the total turbine work output

(wT kJ/kg), the total heat input to the steam generator (q in kJ/kg) and the thermal

efficiency th.

Performance Results - Finally we have all the data and equations required to

determine the performance with the following results:

The work done by the HP, Reheat, and LP turbine set

The total heat input to the steam generator including the reheat section:

The thermal efficiency of the system. Up until now we have not considered the

boiler efficiency. This is dependent on many factors, including the grade of coal

used, the heat transfer and heat loss mechanisms in the boiler, and so on. A

typical design value of boiler efficiency for a large power plant is 88%.

The power output of the turbines, and heat power to the steam generator:

thermal efficiency using only the heat supplied to the steam generator and that rejected

by the condenser.

This is the same efficiency value as obtained by the direct method, thus validating the

method.

Power Plant is amenable to this simplified analysis. Notice that no matter how

complex the system is, we can easily plot the entire system on a P-h diagram in order

to obtain an immediate intuitive understanding and evaluation of the system

performance. The diagram also serves as a usefull validity check by comparing each

value of enthalpy evaluated to the values on the enthalpy axis of the P-h diagram.

The analytical power output (1455 MW) is higher than the actual power output of

1300 MW mainly because of the significant electrical power required to run the power

plant and the heat and pressure drop losses inherent in a large complex system. In

order to justify the complexity of the seven closed feedwater heaters we analysed two

simpler systems for comparison. In all cases we used the same steam mass flow rate of

1234 kg/s and the same feedwater pump turbine system as above. Note that the open

feedwater heater also acts as a de-aerator and storage tank, and is thus a necessary

component of the system.

No closed feedwater heaters in the system. This allows all of the steam to be

directed to the turbines resulting in a much higher power output of 1652 MW,

however with a reduction in thermal efficiency from 46% to 41%.

Using only the three high pressure closed feedwater heaters and not the four

low pressure closed feedwater heaters. This requires a significant increase in the

steam tapped from the outlet of the reheat turbine to be directed to the open

feedwater heater resulting in a lower power output of 1397 MW with a thermal

efficiency of 45%.

Thus use of the seven closed feedwater heaters is justified, resulting in the maximum

thermal efficiency together with a satisfactory power output,

_____________________________________________________________________

__

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

Introduction and Discussion

In the early days of refrigeration the two refrigerants in common use were ammonia

and carbon dioxide. Both were problematic - ammonia is toxic and carbon dioxide

requires extremely high presures (from around 30 to 200 atmospheres!) to operate in a

refrigeration cycle, and since it operates on a transcritical cycle the compressor outlet

temperature is extremely high (around 160C). When Freon 12 (dichloro-diflouromethane) was discovered it totally took over as the refrigerant of choice. It is an

extremely stable, non toxic fluid, which does not interact with the compressor

lubricant, and operates at pressures always somewhat higher than atmospheric, so that

if any leakage occured, air would not leak into the system, thus one could recharge

without having to apply vacuum.

Unfortunately when the refrigerant does ultimately leak and make its way up to the

ozone layer the ultraviolet radiation breaks up the molecule releasing the highly active

chlorine radicals, which help to deplete the ozone layer. Freon 12 has since been

banned from usage on a global scale, and has been essentially replaced by chlorine

free R134a (tetraflouro-ethane) - not as stable as Freon 12, however it does not have

ozone depletion characteristics.

caused by human energy related activity, and various man made substances are defined

on the basis of a Global Warming Potential (GWP) with reference to carbon dioxide

(GWP = 1). R134a has been found to have a GWP of 1300 and in Europe, within a few

years, automobile air conditioning systems will be barred from using R134a as a

refrigerant.

The new hot topic is a return to carbon dioxide as a refrigerant. The previous two

major problems of high pressure and high compressor temperature are found in fact to

be advantageous. The very high cycle pressure results in a high fluid density

throughout the cycle, allowing miniturization of the systems for the same heat

pumping power requirements. Furthermore the high outlet temperature will allow

instant defrosting of automobile windshields (we don't have to wait until the car

engine warms up) and can be used for combined space heating and hot water heating

in home usage (refer for example: Norwegian IEA Heatpump Program Annex28).

Recent update March 2013 - Volkswagen, Daimler, Audi, BMW and Porsche have

announced plans to develop CO2 MAC (Mobile Air Conditioning) systems

(refer: Environmental Leader)

Property Tables for Carbon Dioxide (R744)

We were not able to find any published tables for Carbon Dioxide (R744) refrigerant,

hence decided to create our own. The following set of tables was developed using

software from the NIST (National Institute for Standards and Technology) and has

been organized in a format suitable for evaluating refrigeration and heat pump systems

Thermodynamic Properties of Carbon Dioxide R744

The P-h diagram for Carbon Dioxide (R744)

(R744)

In addition to being a environmentally benign fluid, there can be significant

advantages to using carbon dioxide in a home air-conditioning/heat-pump system

environment. Consider the following system diagram:

compressor outlet temperature can be used to provide hot water at a significant

economy over the regular gas or electric hot water heater. Thus the heat flow to the hot

water heater cools the gas from 160C to 70C, and the heat flow to the space heater

further reduces the gas temperature to 45C.

In order to determine the enthalpy at outlet station (4) we need to consider the energy

equation applied to the internal heat exchanger. Since we assume that it is externally

adiabatic, all the heat transfer is internal, as shown in the following:

Drawing all the processes of the above scheme on a P-h diagram we obtain the

following diagram. Notice the sketches on the diagram of the various components as

well as the internal heat exchanger indicating the heat flow from the gas cooler outlet

(3) - (4) to the compressor inlet (6) - (1).

Problem 9.1 - Use the R744 refrigerant property tables in order to evaluate the

following:

Determine the work done on the compressor [97 kJ/kg].

Determine the heat rejected to the hot water heater [164 kJ/kg], and that rejected

to the space heater [97 kJ/kg].

Determine the Coefficient of Performance of the hot water heater [COPhw=1.7]

and that of the space heater [COPspace=1] (Recall that COP is defined as the

desired heat transferred divided by the work done on the compressor).

Determine the Coefficient of Performance of the air conditioner [COPa/c=1.7].

(Notice from the P-h diagram that the internal heat exchanger significantly

increases the capacity of the air conditioner.)

Problem 9.2 - For the following additional questions we can assume that the

compressor power is 1kW. (Note - we can use the COP values to answer these

questions - we do not need to evaluate the mass flow rate of the refrigerant ):

Determine how long it will take to heat 100 liters of water in the tank from

30C to 60C [2 hours]

During the summer months when the air conditioner is operating, determine the

volumetric flow rate of the air [5.1 m3/min] flowing through the evaporator

cooling duct in order to reduce the air temperature from 30C to 13C. (Note assume a pressure of 100kPa and temperature of 25C to evaluate the specific

volume of the air)

During the winter months when the heat pump is operating, and using the same

fan as above determine increase in temperature of the air [10C] flowing

through the space heating duct.

Problem 9.3 - Notice that the compressor does not follow an isentropic process.

This is a practical system with data adapted from a Visteon Corp. automobile a/c

design. In this exercise you should do the following:

Plot the compressor process (1)-(2) on the enthalpy-entropy (h-s) diagram

provided above. Plot also the isentropic compressor process and (using the

Property Tables) determine the compressor isentropic efficiency C. Recall that

the compressor isentropic efficiency C is defined as the isentropic work done

on the compressor divided by the actual work done. Indicate both the isentropic

work done and the actual work done on the h-s diagram. [C=74%]

known fact that there is a year round constant temperature only a few meters below the

earths surface. In this problem we wish to evaluate a system which is designed to use

this underground thermal source to advantage.

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

a) Humidity and the Adiabatic Saturation Process

Atmospheric air includes dry air and water vapor. Recall that for an ideal gas,

enthalpy (h) is a function of temperature only (h = C P.T). Notice also from the hs diagram for steam that at relatively low temperatures (<60C) the water vapor in the

air has a constant enthalpy at constant temperature from saturated vapor through the

superheated region, thus can be treated as an ideal gas.

From Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures we have for a dry-air/water-vapor mixture that

the total pressure P is given by:

P = P a + Pv

where subscript a refers to the dry air, and v to the water vapor.

We find it convenient to sketch our processes for the water-vapor component on a Tv diagram (which we prefer to the ubiquitous T-s diagram in common use, since

entropy is not considered in this Section)

Consider the water vapor shown at state (1) on the diagram. We will find it convenient

throughout this section to evaluate enthalpy with respect to T 0 = 0C, since ultimately

we only consider differences in enthalpy. From the above diagram:

hv@T = hg@T

where g refers to the saturated vapor state.

Note that hg@T can be obtained from the saturated vapor tables, or one can use Izzi's

method, which has a maximum error of 0.5% at 60C:

We also evaluate the enthalpy of the dry air component with respect to T 0 = 0C, thus:

In order to evaluate the enthalpy of the atmospheric air we need to first find the mass

flow rates of both the dry air and the vapor. We always evaluate these with respect to

the mass flow rate of the dry air, and this in turn leads us to the definition of Specific

Humidity , as follows:

Note that other terms in common usage are humidity ratio or absolute humidity to

denote specific humidity. The specific humidity can be conveniently determined in

terms of the partial pressures Pa and Pv as follows:

Referring to the T-v diagram above, we now define Relative Humidity as follows:

Furthermore, we can determine the specific humidity in terms of the relative humidity,

and vice versa, as follows:

There is no direct method of measuring specific humidity or relative humidity thus

in this section we develop the Adiabatic Saturation Process leading to the

practical Wet & Dry Bulb Thermometer, or Sling Psychrometer. Consider the

channel below in which air of unknown humidity enters at station (1) and after

absorbing moisture from the liquid pool, exits at 100% relative humidity at station (2).

This process is shown on the T-v diagram below.

mass flow:

energy:

In order to determine T2 and T1 we use a wet & dry bulb thermometer (or sling

psychrometer), typically as in the following figure (refer: Sling Psychrometer

Demonstration). The wet bulb is wrapped in a cotton wick saturated with water, and

one swings the thermometer in the air until a steady temperature is attained. The wet

bulb temperature Twb is then very closely equal to the adiabatic saturation temperature

T2.

Note that the relative humidity is then determined by means of a slide-rule on the

handle of the sling-psychrometer, as shown in the above diagram.

On to Section b) - The Psychrometric Chart

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

Processes

We notice from the development in Section a) that the equations relating relative and

specific humidity, temperature (wet and dry bulb), pressure (air, vapor) and enthalpy

are quite tedious and inconvenient. For this reason a Psychrometric Chart relating all

the relevant variables was developed which is extremely useful for designing and

evaluating air-conditioning and cooling tower systems.

At first appearence the psychrometric chart is quite confusing, however with some

practice it becomes an extremely useful tool for rapidly evaluating air-conditioning

processes. The most popular chart in common usage is that developed

by ASHRAE(American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning

Engineers), however we feel that the construction of a simplified version of the chart

based on approximations of the various equations can be a very useful tool for

developing an understanding of it's usage. This approach was suggested by Maged ElShaarawi in his article "On the Psychrometric Chart" published in the ASHRAE

Transactions (Paper #3736, Vol 100, Part 1, 1994) and inspired us to produce the

following simplified psychrometric chart:

The basic information used to construct the chart is the water vapor saturation data

(Tsat, Pg) which is obtained from steam tables over the range from Tsat = 0.01C

through 50C. The specific humidity is then evaluated using the relative humidity

as a parameter to produce the various relative humidity curves (blue lines) as follows:

The saturation curve (100% relative humidity) also known as the dew point curve is

drawn as a red line. Notice that on the saturation curve the wet and dry bulb

temperatures have the same values.

The major simplifying assumption in the construction of the chart is that the enthalpy

of the mixture is assumed to be constant throughout the adiabatic saturation process

(described in Section a). This implies that the evaporating liquid added does not

significantly affect the enthalpy of the air-vapor mixture, leading to the constant slope

wet bulb temperature / enthalpy (red) lines defined by:

Finally, the specific volume of the air-vapor mixture (green lines) is determined from

the ideal gas relation as

It is normal practice to separate out the overlapping enthalpy / wet bulb temperature

lines allowing them to be separately evaluated. Thus we introduce an oblique enthalpy

axis and enthalpy (black) lines as follows:

The four equations highlighted above were programmed in MATLAB and used to plot

the simplified psychrometric charts shown above. Refer to the link:

MATLAB program for plotting a Simplified Psychrometric Chart

An excellent NebGuide (University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension Publication)

on How to use a Simplified Psychrometric Chart has been provided by David

Shelton, and is also available as a pdf file (968k). This guide reduces the confusion by

separately explaining 4 of the 6 sets of curves which make up a psychrometric chart.

Definitely read this guide before continuing.

Solved Problem 10.1 - Assume that the outside air temperature is 32C with a

relative humidity = 60%. Use the psychrometric chart to determine the specific

humidity [18 gm-moisture/kg-air], the enthalpy h [78 kJ/kg-air], the wet-bulb

temperature Twb [25.5C], the dew-point temperature Tdp [23C], and the specific

volume of the dry air v [0.89m3/kg]. Indicate all the values determined on the chart.

Solved Problem 10.2: Assume that the outside air temperature is 8C. If the

air in a room is at 25C with a relative humidity = 40%, use the psychrometric chart

to determine if the windows of that room which are in contact with the outside will

become foggy.

The air in contact with the windows will become colder until the dew point is reached.

Notice that under the conditions of 25C and 40% relative humidity the dew point

temperature is slightly higher than 10C, At that point the water vapor condenses as

the temperature approaches 8C along the saturation line, and the windows will

become foggy.

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

One of the major applications of the Psychrometric Chart is in air conditioning, and

we find that most humans feel comfortable when the temperature is between 22C and

27C, and the relative humidity between 40% and 60%. This defines the "comfort

zone" which is portrayed on the Psychrometric Chart as shown below. Thus with the

aid of the chart we either heat or cool, add moisture or dehumidify as required in order

to bring the air into the comfort zone.

Solved Problem 10.3: Outside air at 35C and 60% relative humidity is to be

conditioned by cooling and heating so as to bring the air to within the "comfort zone".

Using the Psychrometric Chart neatly plot the required air conditioning process and

estimate (a) the amount of moisture removed [11.5g-H20/kg-dry-air], (b) the heat

removed [(1)-(2), qcool = 48kJ/kg-dry-air], and (c) the amount of heat added [(2)-(3),

qheat = 10kJ/kg-dry-air].

Solved Problem 10.4:: Hot dry air at 40C and 10% relative humidity passes

through an evaporative cooler. Water is added as the air passes through a series of

wicks and the mixture exits at 27C. Using the psychrometric chart determine (a) the

outlet relative humidity [45%], (b) the amount of water added [5.4g-H20/kg-dry-air],

and (c) the lowest temperature that could be realized [18.5C].

This type of cooler is extremely popular in hot, dry climates, and is popularly known

as a Swamp Cooler. An interesting application of using a swamp cooler to cool

drinking water in extremely hot environments is described in the posting of Rich

Oppel in the At War blog of the New York Times: 'Drinking From Socks'.

An interesting and informative description on Psychrometric Chart Use for livestock

and greenhouse applications has been presented in a University of Connecticut website

by Michael Darre. Other websites that we found interesting is that of Wikipedia on

Psychrometrics, and one by Sam Hui (Hong Kong University) on using the

psychrometric chart in the 'Climatic Design of Buildings'.

On to Section c) Cooling Towers for Steam Power Plants

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

c) Cooling Towers for Steam Power Plants

steam power plant:

mass flow:

Referring to the diagram above the mass flow rate of the makeup water is given by the

difference in specific humidity at the inlet and outlet air streams multiplied by the

mass flow rate of the dry air. Thus the mass flow balance equations for the cooling

tower become:

energy:

Since no work is done and no heat transfered externally, the cooling tower energy

equation reduces to an enthalpy balance equation. Combining the mass flow equations

with the energy equation leads to the final equation relating the mass flow rate of the

dry air to the circulating cooling water of the condenser, as follows:

The mass flow rate of the liquid water at stations (3) and (4) is normally provided from

the condenser energy equation of the steam power plant. Recall from Chapter

10a that the specific humidity is related to the various pressures and the relative

humidity by the following relations:

The pressure Pv is the partial pressure of the vapor, Pg is the saturation pressure at

temperature T, and P is the total pressure (air + vapor), usually taken as one

atmosphere (101.325 kPa). In Chapter 10b we saw how all of these relations can be

most conveniently evaluated graphically on a Psychrometric Chart. Notice that we

have extended the moisture specific humidity range on this chart from 30 to 40

grams/kg-air in order to accomodate the extremely high humidity normally

encountered at station (2), which is the reason why we normally see a cloud above the

cooling tower.

Note that the enthalpies of the vapor (h1 and h2) and those of the liquid (h3, h4, hmu) can

be conveniently evaluated as follows:

The temperature T is in degrees Celsius, and the specific heat capacity of dry air C P is

approximately 1.00 [kJ/kgC] and that of liquid water approximately 4.18 [kJ/kgC].

In the above analysis we have assumed that the temperature of the makeup water

Tmuequals the temperature of the cooled circulating water T 3. Alternatively the values

of enthalpy for the vapor (h1 and h2) can also be conveniently read directly from the

Psychrometric Chart.

Solved Problem 10.5 - Cooling Tower for the Supercritical Steam Power

Plant for Athens, Ohio

Problem 10.6 - Cooling Tower for the Cogeneration Steam Power Plant for

Ohio University

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

(Thanks to David Bayless for his assistance in writing this section)

Introduction - Up to this point the heat Q in all problems and examples was

either a given value or was obtained from the First Law relation. However in various

heat engines, gas turbines, and steam power plants the heat is obtained from

combustion processes, using either solid fuel (e.g. coal or wood). liquid fuel (e.g.

gasolene, kerosine, or diesel fuel), or gaseous fuel (e.g. natural gas or propane).

generic hydrocarbon fuels - (CxHy), in which the oxydizer is the oxygen contained in

atmospheric air. Note that we will not cover the combustion of solid fuels or the

complex blends and mixtures of the hydrocarbons which make up gasolene, kerosene,

or diesel fuels.

other 79% of "other gases" is mostly nitrogen (N2), so we will assume air to be

composed of 21% oxygen and 79% nitrogen by volume. Thus each mole of oxygen

needed to oxidize the hydrocarbon is accompanied by 79/21 = 3.76 moles of nitrogen.

Using this combination the molecular mass of air becomes 29 [kg/kmol]. Note that it

is assumed that the nitrogen will not normally undergo any chemical reaction.

by the fuel (the hydrocarbon) plus oxydizer (air or oxygen) called the Reactants,

which undergo a chemical process while releasing heat to form the Products of

combustion such that mass is conserved. In the simplest combustion process, known

as Stoichiometric Combustion, all the carbon in the fuel forms carbon dioxide (CO 2)

and all the hydrogen forms water (H2O) in the products, thus we can write the

chemical reaction as follows:

Note that this reaction yields five unknowns: z, a, b, c, d, thus we need five equations

to solve. Stoichiometric combustion assumes that no excess oxygen exists in the

products, thus d = 0. We obtain the other four equations from balancing the number of

atoms of each element in the reactants (carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen) with

the number of atoms of those elements in the products. This means that no atoms are

destroyed or lost in a combustion reaction.

Element

Carbon (C)

Hydrogen (H)

Amount in

reactants

x

y

Amount in Products

a

2b

Reduced

equation

a=x

b = y/2

Oxygen (O)

Nitrogen (N)

2z

2(3.76)z

2a+b

2c

z = a + b/2

c = 3.76z

Note that the water formed could be in the vapor or liquid phase, depending on the

temperature and pressure of the combustion products.

As an example consider the stoichiometric combustion of methane (CH 4) in

atmospheric air. Equating the molar coefficients of the reactants and the products we

obtain:

Theoretical Air and Air-Fuel Ratio -The minimum amount of air which

will allow the complete combustion of the fuel is called the Theoretical Air (also

referred to as Stoichiometric Air). In this case the products do not contain any

oxygen. If we supply less than theoretical air then the products could include carbon

monoxide (CO), thus it is normal practice to supply more than theoretical air to

prevent this occurrence. This Excess Air will result in oxygen appearing in the

products.

The standard measure of the amount of air used in a combustion process is the AirFuel Ratio (AF), defined as follows:

Thus considering only the reactants of the methane combustion with theoretical air

presented above, we obtain:

equation and determine the air-fuel ratio for the complete combustion of n-Butane

(C4H10) with a) theoretical air, and b) 50% excess air.

at elevated temperatures and we assume that all the products of combustion (including

the water vapor) behave as ideal gases. Since they have different gas constants, it is

convenient to use the ideal gas equation of state in terms of the universal gas constant

as follows:

In the analysis of the products of combustion there are a number of items of interest:

1) What is the percentage volume of specific products, in particular carbon

dioxide (CO2) and carbon monoxide (CO)?

2) What is the dew point of the water vapor in the combustion products? This

requires evaluation of the partial pressure of the water vapor component of the

products.

3) There are experimental methods of volumetric analysis of the products of

combustion, normally done on a Dry Basis, yielding the volume percentage of

all the components except the water vapor. This allows a simple method of

determining the actual air-fuel ratio and excess air used in a combustion

process.

For ideal gases we find that the mole fraction yi of the i'th component in a mixture of

gases at a specific pressure P and temperature T is equal to the volume fraction of that

component.

Since from the molar ideal gas relation: P.V = N.R u.T, we have:

Furthermore, since the sum of the component volumes Vi must equal the total volume

V, we have:

Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures:

Solved Problem 11.2 - In this problem Propane (C3H8) is burned with 61%

excess air, which enters a combustion chamber at 25C. Assuming complete

combustion and a total pressure of 1 atm (101.32 kPa), determine a) the air-fuel ratio

[kg-air/kg-fuel], b) the percentage of carbon dioxide by volume in the products, and c)

the dew point temperature of the products.

atmospheric air, and the volumetric analysis of the dry products of combustion yields

the following: 10% CO2, 1% CO, 3% O2, and 86% N2. Develop the combustion

equation, and determine a) the percentage of excess air, b) the air-fuel ratio, and c) the

dew point of the combustion products.

combustion is to produce heat through a change of enthalpy from the reactants to the

products. From the First Law equation in a control volume, ignoring kinetic and

potential energy changes and assuming no work is done, we have:

where the summations are taken over all the products (p) and the reactants (r). N refers

to the number of moles of each component and h [kJ/kmol] refers to the molar

enthalpy of each component.

Since there are a number of different substances involved we need to establish a

common reference state to evaluate the enthalpy, the common choice being 25C and 1

atm which is normally denoted with a superscript o. Prof. S. Bhattacharjee of the San

Diego State University has developed a web based expert system at

<www.thermofluids.net> called TEST (The Expert System for Thermodynamics) in

which he has included a set of ideal gas property tables all based on the enthalpy ho =

0 at this common reference. We have adapted some of these tables specifically for this

section, and these can be found in the following link:

Combustion Molar Enthalpy Tables

As an example, consider again the complete combustion of Methane (CH 4) with

theoretical air:

Notice that in the reactants and the products of the above example we have basic

elements O2 and N2 as well as compounds CH4, CO2, and H2O. When the compound is

formed then the enthalpy change is called the Enthalpy of Formation, denoted hfo,

and for our example:

hfo

[kJ/kmol]

Substance

Formula

Carbon dioxide

CO2(g)

-393,520

Water Vapor

H2O(g)

-241,820

Water

H2O(l)

-285,820

Methane

CH4(g)

-74,850

The negative sign means that the process is Exothermic, i.e. heat is given off when

the compound is formed. Note that the enthalpy of formation of basic elements O 2 and

N2 is zero.

Consider first the case in which there is sufficient heat transfer such that both the

reactants and the products are at 25C and 1 atm pressure, and that the water product is

liquid. Since there is no sensible enthalpy change the energy equation becomes:

This heat (Qcv) is called the Enthalpy of Combustion or the Heating Value of the

fuel. If the products contain liquid water then it is the Higher Heating Value (as in

our example), however if the product contains water vapor then it is the Lower

Heating Value of the fuel. The enthalpy of combustion is the largest amount of heat

that can be released by a given fuel.

example in which we evaluated the enthalpy of combustion is the case of an adiabatic

process in which no heat is released. This results in a significant temperature increase

in the products of combustion (denoted the Adiabatic Flame Temperature) which

can only be reduced by an increase in the air-fuel ratio.

Solved Problem 11.4 - Determine the adiabatic flame temperature for the

complete combustion of Methane ( CH4) with 250% theoretical air in an adiabatic

control volume.

This equation can only be solved by an iterative trial and error procedure using the

tables of Sensible Enthalpy vs Temperature for all four components of the products CO2, H2O, O2, and N2. A quick approximation to the adiabatic flame temperature can

be obtained by assuming that the products consist entirely of air. This approach was

introduced to us by Potter and Somerton in their Schaum's Outline of

Thermodynamics for Engineers, in which they assumed all the products to be N 2.

We find it more convenient to use air assuming a representative value of the Specific

Heat Capacity of Air: Cp,1000K = 1.142 [kJ/kg.K].

Thus summing all the moles of the products we have:

all four products at a temperature of 1280K. This resulted in a total enthalpy of

802,410 [kJ/kmol fuel], which is extremely close to the required value, thus justifying

this approach.

Problem 11.5 - - Determine the adiabatic flame temperature for the complete

combustion of Propane ( C3H8) with 250% theoretical air in an adiabatic control

volume [T = 1300K].

_____________________________________________________________________

_________________

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

## Viel mehr als nur Dokumente.

Entdecken, was Scribd alles zu bieten hat, inklusive Bücher und Hörbücher von großen Verlagen.

Jederzeit kündbar.