Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

68660 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

227 / Monday, November 27, 2006 / Notices

CBSX DPMs will become effective prior necessary or appropriate in furtherance proposed rule change between the
to approval of this filing). Any such of the purposes of the Act. Commission and any person, other than
appointments and allocations would be those that may be withheld from the
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
contingent on Commission approval of public in accordance with the
Statement on Comments on the
rules governing CBSX DPM trading provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
Proposed Rule Change Received From
procedures and obligations. available for inspection and copying in
Initial CBSX DPM stock allocations Members, Participants or Others
the Commission’s Public Reference
would be handled pursuant to proposed The Exchange neither solicited nor Room. Copies of the filing also will be
modified CBOE Rule 53.54. For the received comments with respect to the available for inspection and copying at
initial launch, and potentially in proposed rule change. the principal office of the Exchange. All
instances where CBSX seeks to comments received will be posted
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
commence trading a number of new without change; the Commission does
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
securities at one time, CBSX would not edit personal identifying
Commission Action
conduct a ‘‘draft’’ for eligible CBSX information from submissions. You
DPMs to select available stocks. The Within 35 days of the date of should submit only information that
draft order would be determined publication of this notice in the Federal you wish to make available publicly. All
randomly. In connection with the initial Register or within such longer period (i) submissions should refer to File
launch, the draft would only apply to as the Commission may designate up to Number SR–CBOE–2006–96 and should
the first 500 securities selected.4 After 90 days of such date if it finds such be submitted on or before December 18,
that point, all of the remaining longer period to be appropriate and 2006.
securities slated for trading on CBSX publishes its reasons for so finding, or
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents, For the Commission, by the Division of
would be allocated randomly by CBSX Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
to the CBSX DPMs equally. the Commission will:
authority.7
CBSX would utilize proposed CBOE (A) By order approve the proposed
rule change, or Nancy M. Morris,
Rule 53.54 for future stock allocations as
(B) Institute proceedings to determine Secretary.
well. In those cases, a draft could be
employed or CBSX could allocate the whether the proposed rule change [FR Doc. E6–19982 Filed 11–24–06; 8:45 am]
stocks based on any one or more of the should be disapproved. BILLING CODE 8011–01–P

following: Performance, volume, IV. Solicitation of Comments


capacity, market performance
commitments, operational factors, Interested persons are invited to SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
efficiency, competitiveness, expressed submit written data, views, and COMMISSION
preferences of issuers, and the best arguments concerning the foregoing,
[Release No. 34–54791; File No. SR–CHX–
interest of CBSX. including whether the proposed rule 2006–31]
The ability to allocate stocks to CBSX change is consistent with the Act.
DPMs ahead of the launch of the CBSX Comments may be submitted by any of Self-Regulatory Organizations;
facility would allow the Exchange and the following methods: Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice
the CBSX DPM firms to be prepared to Electronic Comments of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
commence trading on CBSX of Proposed Rule Change and
• Use the Commission’s Internet Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to
immediately upon approval of CBSX
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Participant Fees and Credits
trading rules and pursuant to a robust
rules/sro.shtml); or
rollout schedule. The Exchange seeks to • Send an e-mail to rule- November 20, 2006.
launch the CBSX facility on February 5, comments@sec.gov. Please include File Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
2007. Number SR–CBOE–2006–96 on the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
2. Statutory Basis subject line. ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
The Exchange believes the proposed Paper Comments notice is hereby given that on October
rule change is consistent with Section 23, 2006, the Chicago Stock Exchange,
• Send paper comments in triplicate Inc. (‘‘CHX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
6(b) of the Act 5 in general and furthers to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the the Securities and Exchange
Securities and Exchange Commission, Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
Act 6 in particular in that it serves to 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
remove impediments to and perfect the proposed rule change as described in
20549–1090. Items I, II, and III below, which Items
mechanism of a free and open market
because it will help the Exchange All submissions should refer to File have been prepared by the CHX. On
manage the initial launch of trading on Number SR-CBOE–2006–96. This file November 15, 2006, the CHX filed
CBSX. number should be included on the Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the change.3 The CHX has designated this
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Commission process and review your proposal as one establishing or changing
Statement on Burden on Competition comments more efficiently, please use
The Exchange believes that this only one method. The Commission will 7 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
proposed rule change would not impose post all comments on the Commission’s
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
any burden on competition that is not Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ 3 The purpose of Amendment No. 1 is to provide
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the further clarity as to the proposed NTM Fee
4 Telephone conversation between Angelo submission, all subsequent
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

Schedule changes, by providing additional


Evangelou, Assistant General Counsel, CBOE, and amendments, all written statements commentary with respect to: (i) The provisions of
Nathan Saunders, Special Counsel, Division of the NTM Fee Schedule that are impacted; (ii) the
Market Regulation, Commission, November 20,
with respect to the proposed rule
amounts of the fees established by such provisions;
2006. change that are filed with the (iii) the basis for certain changes or references to
5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). Commission, and all written these provisions; and (iv) the correction of certain
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). communications relating to the rule change marking.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:58 Nov 24, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00132 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27NON1.SGM 27NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 227 / Monday, November 27, 2006 / Notices 68661

a member due, fee, or other charge 2006.7 Subsequent industry Matching System Routing Fees/
imposed by the CHX pursuant to developments, and further refinement of Transaction and Order Processing Fees
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,4 and certain NTM Fee Schedule provisions, Associated With Securities Not Yet
Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,5 which have necessitated several changes to the Traded in the Matching System: These
renders the proposal effective upon NTM Fee Schedule. These changes are changes to Section E.6 and Section E.8
filing with the Commission. The summarized below: (formerly E.7) of the NTM Fee Schedule
Commission is publishing this notice to Trading Permit Fees: There is no relate to the fees that the CHX may
solicit comments on the proposed rule change to the text of Section A of the assess against its participants on
change, as amended, from interested NTM Fee Schedule. The text of Section account of outbound NMS Linkage Plan
persons. A merely incorporates the Trading orders. Section E.6 applies to orders that
Permit cancellation fee that was in place are Matching System eligible and
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s therefore are routed from the Matching
prior to submission of the NTM Fee
Statement of the Terms of Substance of System to other market centers. Section
Schedule.8 This cancellation fee is
the Proposed Rule Change E.8 applies to orders that have not yet
unchanged and remains in effect for
The CHX proposes several changes to Trading Permits that were issued before migrated to the Matching System and
its Schedule of Participant Fees and October 1, 2006. This provision was therefore are routed from the Exchange’s
Credits (the ‘‘NTM Fee Schedule’’), inadvertently omitted from the NTM pre-NTM facilities.
relating to the new trading model being Fee Schedule when it was submitted in This provision was necessitated in
implemented by the CHX this fall. The SR–CHX–2006–29.9 order to implement the CHX’s
text of this proposed rule change is Registration Fees: This change is participation in the exchange-to-
available on the Exchange’s Web site at intended to clarify application of the exchange billing arrangement associated
http://www.chx.com/rules/ Off-Exchange trader fee. The $500 with the NMS Linkage Plan, which took
proposed_rules.htm and in the annual fee is assessed for a trader who effect on October 1, 2006.10 When an
Commission’s Public Reference Room. is engaged in proprietary securities outbound NMS Linkage Plan order is
trading for an Off-Exchange Participant executed on another NMS Linkage
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s participant market, such market will
Statement of the Purpose of, and Firm for which the CHX is the
Designated Examining Authority, if directly invoice the CHX for a
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule transaction fee, in an amount that may
Change such Participant Firm is solely involved
in proprietary securities trading. The not exceed the transaction fee that it
In its filing with the Commission, the clarifying change relates to the would charge its own member for such
CHX included statements concerning Participant Firm; the Participant Firm an execution. The CHX is then
the purpose of, and basis for, the must be solely involved in proprietary responsible for payment of such invoice.
proposed rule change and discussed any securities trading for the fee to be Sections E.6 and E.8 of the NTM Fee
comments it received on the proposed assessed. Other Participant Firms would Schedule provision permit the CHX to
rule change. The text of these statements not be assessed an Off-Exchange trader collect a corresponding fee from the
may be examined at the places specified fee. CHX participant who generated the
in Item IV below. The CHX has prepared Transaction and Order Processing outbound NMS Linkage Plan order. The
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, Fees: This change to Section E.1 of the CHX believes that it is appropriate to
and C below, of the most significant NTM Fee Schedule is intended to clarify establish outbound NMS Linkage fee
aspects of such statements. rates that reasonably correspond to the
that the liquidity taking fee of $0.0028/
respective transaction fee rates being
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s share for a Matching System single
charged by the executing markets.
Statement of the Purpose of, and order execution does not apply to a CHX
Accordingly, it is submitting changes to
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule institutional broker in connection with
Sections E.6 and E.8 of the NTM Fee
Change a transaction that is subject to the
Schedule, to reflect recent
agency fees set forth in Section E.3 of
1. Purpose developments regarding applicable
the NTM Fee Schedule. Because the
transaction fees assessed by other
Throughout 2006, the Exchange has institutional broker’s customer is
market centers on account of NMS
been working on the design and assessed the agency fee under Section
Linkage Plan executions.
development of a new trading model E.3, the institutional broker would not As an example, in the NTM Fee
centered around a core matching system also be subject to a take fee for the same Schedule, the CHX originally
that will provide for fully automated transaction. This change does not established an outbound fee, for non-
electronic matching of orders, as well as modify applicable provisions regarding ETF orders routed to the Nasdaq Stock
corresponding rules and regulatory credits for providing liquidity to the Market, that was significantly higher
initiatives. On September 29, 2006, the Matching System. than Nasdaq’s applicable transaction fee
Exchange’s proposed rules relating to rate for October, 2006.11 This proposed
the new trading model were approved 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54657
rule change seeks to modify this rate for
by the Commission.6 (October 26, 2006); 71 FR 64590 (November 2, 2006)
(SR–CHX–2006–29). The NTM Fee Schedule the balance of the month of October; the
On September 29, 2006, the Exchange provides for all fees and charges that are billed by rate would then revert to the originally-
filed with the Commission its NTM Fee the Exchange to its participants; it does not contain
Schedule, contemplating the Exchange’s any fees or charges that are applicable to non- 10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54548

transition to its new trading model, participants. (September 29, 2006), 71 FR 59159 (October 6,
8 This fee, which is applicable to trading permits
commencing the week of October 23, 2006) (SR–CHX–2006–28) (approving NMS Linkage
in effect before October 1, 2006, is $2,000, or, if less, Plan exchange-to-exchange billing procedures);
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

$500/month for the remainder of the one-year term. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54551
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 9 The provision was not shown in Exhibit 5 to (September 29, 2006), 71 FR 59148 (October 6,
5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 2006) (approving NMS Linkage Plan).
SR–CHX–2006–29, but was not deleted in such
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54550 submission (or any other submission) and remains 11 The CHX anticipated that Nasdaq’s transaction

(September 29, 2006); 71 FR 59563 (October 10, applicable. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. fee rate was increasing, but the increase ultimately
2006) (SR–CHX–2006–05) (referred to as the ‘‘NTM 54657 (October 26, 2006); 71 FR 64590 (November was filed with an effective date of November 1,
Approval Order’’). 2, 2006) (SR–CHX–2006–29). 2006 instead of October 1.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:58 Nov 24, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00133 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27NON1.SGM 27NON1
68662 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 227 / Monday, November 27, 2006 / Notices

filed rate effective November 1, 2006. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s submission, all subsequent
Specifically, from October 23 through Statement on Comments on the amendments, all written statements
October 31, 2006, the outbound fee for Proposed Rule Change Received From with respect to the proposed rule
NMS Linkage orders routed to Nasdaq Members, Participants or Others change that are filed with the
(in issues other than exchange-traded No written comments were either Commission, and all written
funds) would decrease from $.0030/ solicited or received. communications relating to the
share to $.0007/share. On November 1, proposed rule change between the
2006, the effective date of Nasdaq’s fee III. Date of Effectiveness of the Commission and any person, other than
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for those that may be withheld from the
increase, the CHX outbound NMS
Commission Action public in accordance with the
Linkage routing fee for such issues
would return to $.0030/share. This Because the foregoing proposed rule provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
change is not applicable to orders for change establishes or changes a member available for inspection and copying in
due, fee or other charge imposed by the the Commission’s Public Reference
exchange-traded funds.
Exchange, it has become effective Room. Copies of such filing also will be
Trade Processing Fees: New Section pursuant to Section 19(B)(3)(A) of the available for inspection and copying at
E.7 of the NTM Fee Schedule is not a Act 14 and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule the principal office of the CHX. All
new provision; this provision, which 19b–4 thereunder.15 At any time within comments received will be posted
provides for a Trade Processing Fee of 60 days of the filing of such proposed without change; the Commission does
$.0015/share, up to $100 per side of the rule change, the Commission may not edit personal identifying
trade, is merely relocated from former summarily abrogate such rule change if information from submissions. You
Section H.2. New Section H.2. it appears to the Commission that such should submit only information that
establishes a Clearing Support Activity action is necessary or appropriate in the you wish to make available publicly. All
Fee, which will be assessed by the CHX public interest, for the protection of submissions should refer to File
beginning January 1, 2007. This fee of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of Number SR–CHX–2006–31 and should
$.02 per ticket, capped at $8,000 per the purposes of the Act.16 be submitted on or before December 18,
month, will apply to firms that average, 2006.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
within a month, at least 2,500 tickets For the Commission, by the Division of
per day. In establishing this fee, the Interested persons are invited to Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
CHX is attempting to defray some of the submit written data, views, and authority.17
expenses associated with clearing arguments concerning the foregoing, Nancy M. Morris,
support services that it provides to including whether the proposed rule Secretary.
certain participant firms. Prior to change, as amended, is consistent with [FR Doc. E6–19981 Filed 11–24–06; 8:45 am]
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
submission of the NTM Fee Schedule, BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
any of the following methods:
these expenses were largely offset by a
portion of the Specialist Fixed Fee, Electronic Comments
which was eliminated in the NTM Fee SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
• Use the Commission’s Internet COMMISSION
Schedule. Although this fee is a new comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
fee, the actual aggregate amount rules/sro.shtml); or
assessed by the CHX will decrease, due • Send an e-mail to rule- [Release No. 34–54775; File No. SR–DTC–
to elimination of the Specialist Fixed comments@sec.gov. Please include File 2006–14]
Fee. Accordingly, the CHX believes that No. SR–CHX–2006–31 on the subject Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
it is appropriate to institute the new line. Depository Trust Company; Notice of
Clearing Support Activity Fee. Paper Comments Filing and Order Granting Accelerated
2. Statutory Basis • Send paper comments in triplicate Approval of a Proposed Rule Change
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, To Amend Its Certificate of
The CHX believes that the proposed Organization To Provide for the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
rule change is consistent with Section Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Issuance of an Additional 500,000
6(b)(4) of the Act 12 in that it provides Washington, DC 20549–1090. Shares of DTC Series A Preferred
for the equitable allocation of reasonable All submissions should refer to File Stock
dues, fees and other charges among its Number SR–CHX–2006–31. This file November 17, 2006.
members.13 number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Statement on Burden on Competition Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use (‘‘Act’’),1 notice is hereby given that on
only one method. The Commission will October 6, 2006, The Depository Trust
The Exchange does not believe that Company (‘‘DTC’’) filed with the
the proposed rule change will impose post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ Securities and Exchange Commission
any burden on competition. (‘‘Commission’’) and on November 14,
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
2006, amended, the proposed rule
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
change described in Items I, II, and III
12 15
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). below, which items have been prepared
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
primarily by DTC. The Commission is
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

16 For purposes of calculating the 60-day period


13 Email from Kathleen Boege, Vice President and
within which the Commission may summarily publishing this notice and order to
Associate General Counsel, CHX, to Joseph Morra, abrogate the proposed rule change under Section
Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation
solicit comments from interested
19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission considers
(‘‘Division’’), Commission, and Sara Gillis, the period to commence on November 15, 2006, the
Attorney, Division, Commission, dated November 17 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
date on which the CHX filed Amendment No. 1. See
16, 2006. 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:58 Nov 24, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00134 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27NON1.SGM 27NON1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen