Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Universidade Luterana do Brazil, Post-graduate Program of Dentistry, Canoas; and2Universidade de Passo Fundo, Dental School,
Passo Fundo, Brazil
Abstract
Kopper PMP, Figueiredo JAP, Della Bona A, Vanni
JR, Bier CA, Bopp S. Comparative in vivo analysis of the sealing ability of three endodontic sealers in post-prepared root canals.
International Endodontic Journal, 36, 857^863, 2003.
Introduction
Studies show that the microbial contamination or recontamination of the root canal system is a decisive factor
in the prognosis of root canal treatment. Lesions refractory to root canal treatment are associated with the presence of microorganisms within the lesions and root
canal system, and these microorganisms are responsible for the continued presence of apical periodontitis
(Tronstad et al.1987, Sundqvist et al.1988, Nair et al.1990).
857
858
859
Table 1 Comparison of means and SDs for length of obturation, measurement of extent of dye penetration and rate of penetration in
relation to length of obturation between the three study groups
Characteristic
AH Plus (N 19)
Endofill (N 22)
Sealer 26 (N 22)
P-value
3.45 0.58
0.13 0.16a
4.1 5.1a
3.32 0.64
2.27 1.37b
69.6 38.9b
3.45 0.58
3.08 1.05c
90.1 26.7c
0.713
<0.001
<0.001
ANOVA and rank transformation: different letters (in superscript) indicate statistically significant differences according to Duncan multiple comparisons.
Results
During extraction, some roots were fractured or
damaged, and17 specimens were lost, ve in the Endoll
group, seven in the AH Plus group, and ve in the Sealer
26 group. Therefore, the Endoll and Sealer 26 groups
had 22 specimens each, and the AH Plus group had 19.
Results of statistical analysis are shown inTable 1. Statistical analysis revealed that there was no signicant
dierence in length of lling material left in the root
860
Discussion
It is still a challenge to avoid contamination or recontamination of the root canal system after completion of
root canal treatment.When postplacement is necessary,
the exposure of lling materials to the oral uids is not
well controlled by most dentists. This study simulated
this clinical condition by using dogs as an experimental
model and hypothesized that the sealers under investigation varied in terms of their ability to prevent or reduce
coronal leakage.
In contrast to most in vitro studies (Swanson &
Madison 1987, Magura et al. 1991), a single period
(45 days) of exposure of the lling materials to the oral
cavity conditions was established. More than one period
would have required a larger sample and a larger number
of animals.
It is important to point out that the dogs were
administered atropine sulphate and intubated before
861
862
Conclusions
After 45 days exposure to the oral cavity, none of the sealers showed perfect sealing ability, nor did they prevent
coronal dye penetration.
There were statistically signicant dierences between the sealers studied; increasing extent and degree
of penetration were observed in the following order:
AH Plus, Endoll and Sealer 26.
References
Alves J, Walton R, Drake D (1988) Coronal leakage: endotoxin
penetration from mixed bacterial communities through
obturated, post-prepared root canals. Journal of Endodontics
24, 587^91.
Barrieshi KM,Walton RE, JohnsonWT, Drake DR (1997) Coronal
leakage of mixed anaerobic bacteria after obturation and post
space preparation. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, OralPathology,
Oral Radiology, Endodontics 84, 310^4.
Barroso LS, Bruno CC, Habitante SM, Jorge AOC (2002) Analise
da capacidade seladora frente a inltracao de Enterococcus
faecalis de dois cimentos endodonticos. Pesquisa Odontologica
Brasileira 16 (Suppl.), 128 (Abstract Pa046).
Borba MV (2001) Avaliacao in vitro da Inltracao Microbiana
Cervico-apical em Canais Radiculares Preparados Para Pino.
Thesis. Canoas, Brazil: Universidade Luterana do Brasil.
De Almeida WA, Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva LAB
(2000) Evaluation of apical sealing of three endodontic sealers. International EndodonticJournal 33, 25^7.
Friedman S, Komorowski R, Maillet W, Klimate R, Nhuyen HQ,
Torneck CD (2000) In vivo resistance of coronally induced
bacterial ingress by an experimental glass ionomer sealer
root canal sealer. Journal of Endodontics 26, 1^5.
Garberoglio R, Bassa SO (1983) O dente transparente. ARS
CVRANDI Odontologia 9, 5^7.
Gish SP, Drake DR,Walton RE,Wilcox L (1994) Coronal leakage:
bacterial penetration through obturated canals following
post preparation. Jounal of the American Dental Association
125, 1369^72.
Ha| kel Y, Wittenmeyer W, Bateman G, Bentaleb A, Allemann C
(1999) A new method for the quantitative analysis of endodontic microleakage. Journal of Endodontics 25, 172^7.
Khayat A, Lee SJ, Torabinejad M (1993) Human saliva penetration of coronally unsealed obturated root canals. Jounal of
Endodontics 19, 458^61.
Madison S, Wilcox LW (1988) An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part III. In vivo study.
Journal of Endodontics 14, 455^8.
Magura ME, KafrawyAH, Brown CE, Newton CW (1991) Human
saliva coronal microleakage in obturated root canals: an in
vitro study. Journal of Endodontics 17, 324^31.
863