Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
equations
Shayak Bhattacharjee
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208016, India
[DOI: 10.1119/1.3633696]
I. INTRODUCTION
The analysis of the induction motor is generally the domain
of electrical engineering. In this paper, we present an alternative analysis based on physical considerations. Our results are
in terms of geometrical parameters of the motor rather than in
terms of reactances of the different components.
The standard procedure1 for evaluating the performance
of a three-phase AC squirrel cage motor is a perphase analysis of a circuit containing Thevenin equivalents of the stator,
rotor, and load. That is, each phase of the circuit is analyzed
separately and then the results for the three phases are combined. The analysis proceeds as for a transformer, with the
coupling between windings taken to be a function of the rotation speed. The circuit diagram is shown in Fig. 1. Here R1
and X1 refers to the resistance and the reactance of the stator,
R2 and X2 to those of the rotor, and Req and Xeq are the equivalent parameters for the motor as a whole. V1 is the voltage
applied to the stator. From Thevenins theorem, we have
Req iXeq R1 iX1 jjRc jjiXm ;
(1)
Rc jjiXm
:
R1 iX1 Rc jjiXm
(2)
(4)
where ~
r is the position vector of the field point P (see Fig. 3)
relative to the dipole. In our case the dipoles are oriented
~ is in the z direction at
with their axes in the x-y plane and A
all points in the x-y plane. For simplicity, we use a twodimensional geometry.
(3)
http://aapt.org/ajp
43
~
A
;
l0 =4p
(5)
and obtain
~0
A
Mr sin h
R2
r2
^
k;
(6)
where ^, ^|, and k^ are the unit vectors in the x, y, and z directions, respectively. Likewise for dipole 2,
p
3
1
Mr
sin
h
0
2 Mr cos h
2
^
~
A
k;
(7)
R2 r2 2Rr cosh 2p=33=2
and for dipole 3,
p
3
1
Mr
sin
h
0
2 Mr cos h
2
^
~
A
k:
(8)
R2 r2 2Rr cosh 4p=33=2
2
R
where M0, M1, and M2 are the strengths of dipoles 1, 2, and
3, respectively.
Equation (9) has the form
p
1
r
1
3
0
~
jA j 2
M0 sin h M1 sin h
M1 cos h
R
R
2
2
p
1
3
M2 cos h
M2 sin h
2
2
2
r
3M0 sin h cos h
10
R
which is a power series in r=R. We assume r R and retain
only the first-order terms.
We use the fact that the dipole moment is proportional to
the current flowing through it, and let M be the peak strength
of each dipole in the motor. Then
Fig. 2. (a) Top view of a three-phase squirrel cage AC motor. The cage of
the motor has a radius r, the radial extension of each conducting bar is s, and
R(> r) is the distance between the center of the core and the center of a
dipole. (b) Front view of the motor. The height of the cage is h.
44
M0 M sin Xt
(11a)
M1 M sinXt 2p=3
(11b)
M2 M sinXt 4p=3:
(11c)
We substitute Eq. (11) into the first term of Eq. (10) and
obtain
p
rM
1
1
3
0
~
sin Xt
A 3 sin Xt sin h
cos Xt
R
2
2
2
p
p
1
1
3
sin Xt
cos Xt
sin h 3 cos h
2
2
2
p
^
sin h 3 cos h k;
(12)
Shayak Bhattacharjee
44
(13)
~ A
~ and changing to cylindrical coordinates
~ r
By using B
q, h, and z we obtain
^
~ 3l0 M sinh Xt^
q cosh Xth:
B
8p R3
(14)
3l0 M
:
8p R3
(15)
(16)
(17)
~ I~
~ is
The infinitesimal force, from F
l B,
^
~ rhB2 X xrsin2 h Xt0 srdh h;
dF
0
(18)
3sjV~eq j2
;
f1 R2
(22)
which shows that the torque depends linearly on the frequency difference, which is referred to as the slip frequency.
The torque as a function of the slip has been experimentally measured and also calculated numerically (see Fig. 4).7
As expected, the torque increases linearly in the low slip
region. The saturation at a slip frequency around 10 Hz is a
~
consequence of the breakdown of linear response. As E
~
increases, the first correction to J appears in the form
~ r0 jEj
~ 2 E.
~ For practical applications, the motor genJ~ rE
erally operates in the linear regime.
III. APPLICATION
We apply Eq. (21) to a motor of type 6FXA7059 manufactured by Crompton Greaves9 and obtain an estimate for the
torque from the data and the picture in Fig. 5. The motor
weighs 2050 kg and has six dipoles that are powered with
2180 Volts. The continuous (maximum) ratings are a current
of 370 A (450 A), a speed of 1583 rpm (3174 rpm), and a
torque of 6930 Nm (10000 Nm).
We note from Fig. 5 that h=R 2 and R=r 3. The current
value indicates a copper wire of double zero gauge, which is
thicker than gauge zero. For equal weights of the stator and
rotor there is approximately 240 m of wire in each dipole. If
we assume a density of 6000 kg m3 for the laminated iron
cage, we obtain r 0.16 m, R 0.5 m, and h 1 m. Another
assumption is that the dipoles are squares of side 20 cm so
that the six dipoles cover a third of the circumference of the
cage. Each dipole has about 360 turns of wire, and the
(19)
(20)
(21)
Fig. 4. The torque as a function of the slip frequency. The data are taken
from Ref. 7. The circles and squares correspond to experimental data and
numerical calculations respectively. Points where the two coincide are
shown as diamonds.
Shayak Bhattacharjee
45
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I am grateful to KVPY, Government of India, for a
fellowship.
1
46
The Electrical Engineering Handbook, 3rd ed. CRC, Boca Raton, FL,
2006.
2
D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Pearson Education, Saddle River, NJ, 2008).
3
C. S. MacLatchy, P. Backman, and L. Bogan, A quantitative magnetic
braking experiment, Am. J. Phys. 61(12), 10961101 (1993).
4
K. D. Hahn, E. M. Johnson, A. Brokken, and S. Baldwin, Eddy current
damping of a magnet moving through a pipe, Am. J. Phys. 66(12),
10661076 (1998).
5
B. A. Knyazev, I. A. Kotelnikov, A. A. Tyutin, and V. S. Cherkasskii,
Braking of a magnetic dipole moving with an arbitrary velocity through a
conducting pipe,, Phys. Usp. 49(9), 937946 (2006).
6
Y. Levin, F. L. da Silveira, and F. B. Rizzato, Electromagnetic braking: A
simple quantitative model, Am. J. Phys. 74(9), 815817 (2006).
7
E. Vassent, G. Meunier, A. Foggia, and G. Reyne, Simulation of induction
machine operation using a step by step finite element method coupled with
circuits and mechanical equations, IEEE Trans. Magn. 27(6), 52325234
(1991).
8
hindianrail.wikia.com=wiki=WAP5i.
9
hwww.cgglobal.com=frontend=ProductDetail.aspx?id=bUPousS3GXk=i.
Shayak Bhattacharjee
46