Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

56920 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

188 / Thursday, September 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules

property under NARA’s control. It (e) The Federal Records Centers. The nonattainment area. The revisions add
specifically provides that all people Federal Records Centers in Ellenwood, additional controls on VOC emissions
who arrive, work at, or visit NARA- Georgia, and Riverside, California, as from industrial wastewater systems in
controlled facilities are subject to the specified in 36 CFR 1253.6 (d) and (l), the Beaumont/Port Arthur, Dallas/Fort
inspection of their personal property. respectively. Worth, El Paso, and Houston/Galveston
The General Services Administration’s (f) Additional Facilities. As other areas. The revisions also amend
(GSA) regulations at 41 CFR 102–74 properties come under the control of the requirements to identify and correct
provide for the inspection of personal Archivist of the United States, they will emissions from VOC leaks from
property in the possession of all people be listed in these regulations as soon as facilities that refine petroleum or
who arrive, work at, or visit NARA practicable. process natural gas, gasoline or
facilities controlled by GSA, but petrochemicals in the Beaumont/Port
§§ 1280.4, 1280.6 and 1280.8
NARA’s regulations at 36 CFR 1280.8 [Redesignated as §§ 1280.6, 1280.8 and
Arthur, Dallas/Fort Worth, El Paso, and
specifically provide, at the current time, 1280.4] Houston/Galveston areas, and from
only for the inspection of personal petroleum refineries in Gregg, Nueces,
4. In Subpart A, redesignate §§ 1280.4,
property of visitors on NARA-controlled and Victoria Counties. We are proposing
1280.6 and 1280.8 as §§ 1280.6, 1280.8
property. to approve the revisions pursuant to
NARA controlled properties are those and 1280.4, respectively.
5. Revise newly designated § 1280.4 to section 110 and part D of the Federal
listed in 36 CFR 1280.2. We have Clean Air Act. The control of VOC
read as follows:
identified in 36 CFR 1280.2 three emissions will help to attain and
additional NARA-controlled properties § 1280.4 What items are subject to maintain the 8-hour national ambient
that have come into the NARA system inspection by NARA? air quality standard for ozone in Texas.
since this part was last updated. NARA may, at its discretion, inspect Approval will make the revised
The regulations at 41 CFR part 102– the personal property in the possession regulations Federally enforceable.
74 will continue to provide the of any NARA contractor, employee, DATES: Written comments should be
authority to inspect all packages, student intern, visitor, volunteer, or received on or before October 30, 2006.
briefcases, and other containers in the other person arriving on, working at, ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to
possession of all persons on property visiting, or departing from NARA Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air Planning
under the control of GSA. property.
This proposed rule is not a significant Section (6PD–L), Environmental
regulatory action for the purposes of Dated: September 22, 2006. Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross
Executive Order 12866 and has not been Allen Weinstein, Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
reviewed by the Office of Management Archivist of the United States. 75202–2733. Comments may also be
and Budget. As required by the [FR Doc. E6–15927 Filed 9–27–06; 8:45 am] submitted electronically or through
Regulatory Flexibility Act, I certify that BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
hand delivery/courier by following the
this rule will not have a significant detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES
impact on a substantial number of small section of the direct final rule located in
entities because this proposed rule the rules section of this Federal
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
affects NARA contractors, employees, Register.
AGENCY
student interns, visitors, volunteers and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
other persons on NARA controlled 40 CFR Part 52 Young, Air Planning Section (6PD–L),
property. This regulation does not have [EPA–R06–OAR–2005–TX–0015; FRL–8224– Environmental Protection Agency,
any federalism implications. 6] Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, telephone
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1280
Approval and Promulgation of Air 214–665–6645; fax number 214–665–
Archives and records. Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; 7263; e-mail address
For the reasons set forth in the Revisions To Control Volatile Organic young.carl@epa.gov.
preamble, NARA proposes to amend Compound Emissions; Volatile SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
part 1280 of title 36, Code of Federal Organic Compound Control for El final rules section of this Federal
Regulations as follows: Paso, Gregg, Nueces, and Victoria Register, EPA is approving the State’s
Counties and the Ozone Standard SIP submittal as a direct final rule
PART 1280—USE OF NARA Nonattainment Areas of Beaumont/
FACILITIES without prior proposal because the
Port Arthur, Dallas/Fort Worth, and Agency views this as a noncontroversial
1. The authority citation for part 1280 Houston/Galveston submittal and anticipates no relevant
continues to read as follows: AGENCY: Environmental Protection adverse comments. A detailed rationale
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 2104(a). Agency (EPA). for the approval is set forth in the direct
ACTION: Proposed rule. final rule. If no relevant adverse
2. Revise the heading for part 1280 to
comments are received in response to
read as set forth above:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve this action, no further activity is
3. Amend § 1280.2 to add paragraphs
Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) contemplated. If EPA receives relevant
(d), (e), and (f) to read as follows:
revisions. The revisions pertain to adverse comments, the direct final rule
§ 1280.2 What property is under the regulations to control Volatile Organic will be withdrawn and all public
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS

control of the Archivist of the United Compound (VOC) emissions from comments received will be addressed in
States? facilities in El Paso, Gregg, Nueces, and a subsequent final rule based on this
* * * * * Victoria Counties; the 8-hour ozone proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
(d) The National Archives Southwest standard nonattainment areas of second comment period. Any parties
Region. The National Archives Beaumont/Port Arthur and Houston/ interested in commenting on this action
Southeast Region in Morrow, Georgia as Galveston; and portions of the Dallas/ should do so at this time. Please note
specified in 36 CFR 1253.7 (e). Fort Worth 8-hour ozone standard that if EPA receives adverse comment

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:43 Sep 27, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM 28SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 188 / Thursday, September 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules 56921

on an amendment, paragraph, or section receives adverse comments, the direct special characters, any form of
of the rule, and if that provision may be final rule will be withdrawn and all encryption, and be free of any defects or
severed from the remainder of the rule, public comments received will be viruses.
EPA may adopt as final those provisions addressed in a subsequent final rule Docket: All documents in the
of the rule that are not the subject of an based on this proposed rule. EPA will electronic docket are listed in the
adverse comment. not institute a second comment period. http://www.regulations.gov index.
For additional information, see the Any parties interested in commenting Although listed in the index, some
direct final rule which is located in the on this action should do so at this time. information is not publicly available,
rules section of this Federal Register. DATES: Comments must be received in i.e., CBI or other information whose
Dated: September 12, 2006. writing by October 30, 2006. disclosure is restricted by statute.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
Certain other material, such as
Richard E. Greene,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA– copyrighted material, is not placed on
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
R03–OAR–2006–0728 by one of the the Internet and will be publicly
[FR Doc. E6–15932 Filed 9–27–06; 8:45 am] available only in hard copy form.
following methods:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
A. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow Publicly available docket materials are
the online instructions for submitting available either electronically in http://
comments. www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION during normal business hours at the Air
AGENCY B. E-mail: morris.makeba@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0728, Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
40 CFR Part 52 Makeba Morris, Chief, Air Quality Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Planning Branch Name, Mailcode Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
[EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0728; FRL–8225–2] 3AP21, U.S. Environmental Protection 19103. Copies of the State submittal are
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, available at the West Virginia
Approval and Promulgation of Air Department of Environmental
Quality Implementation Plans; WV; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously- Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601
Emission Reductions to Meet Phase II 57th Street SE., Charleston, WV.
of the Nitrogen Oxides (NOX); SIP Call listed EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Docket’s normal hours of operation, and Marilyn Powers, (215) 814–2308, or by
Agency (EPA). special arrangements should be made e-mail at powers.marilyn@epa.gov.
ACTION: Proposed rule. for deliveries of boxed information. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
Instructions: Direct your comments to further information, please see the
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to convert a Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2006– information provided in the direct final
conditional approval in the West 0728. EPA’s policy is that all comments action, with the same title, that is
Virginia State Implementation Plan received will be included in the public located in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
(SIP) to a full approval. The SIP revision docket without change, and may be section of this Federal Register
pertains to nitrogen oxides (NOX) made available online at http:// publication. Please note that if EPA
emission reductions required in West www.regulations.gov, including any receives adverse comment on an
Virginia to meet Phase II of the NOX SIP personal information provided, unless amendment, paragraph, or section of
Call (Phase II). In order to meet the the comment includes information this rule and if that provision may be
Phase II submission due date, the West claimed to be Confidential Business severed from the remainder of the rule,
Virginia Department of Environmental Information (CBI) or other information EPA may adopt as final those provisions
Protection (WVDEP) adopted its Phase II whose disclosure is restricted by statute. of the rule that are not the subject of an
requirements under its emergency rule Do not submit information that you adverse comment.
procedures. EPA granted conditional consider to be CBI or otherwise Dated: September 20, 2006.
approval of the emergency rule protected through http:// Donald S. Welsh,
contingent upon the WVDEP adopting a www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The Regional Administrator, Region II.
permanent rule with an effective date no http://www.regulations.gov Web site is
[FR Doc. E6–15983 Filed 9–27–06; 8:45 am]
later than the June 2, 2006 sunset date an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
of its emergency rule and submitting the means EPA will not know your identity
permanent rule as a formal SIP revision or contact information unless you
to EPA by July 1, 2006. West Virginia provide it in the body of your comment.
has met all the terms of the conditional If you send an e-mail comment directly DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
approval by adopting its permanent rule to EPA without going through http://
Bureau of Reclamation
with an effective date of May 1, 2006, www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
and submitting the permanent rule to address will be automatically captured
43 CFR Parts 421 and 423
EPA before July 1, 2006. In the Final and included as part of the comment
Rules section of this Federal Register, that is placed in the public docket and RIN 1006–AA52
EPA is converting the conditional made available on the Internet. If you
approval of the State’s SIP revision to a submit an electronic comment, EPA Public Conduct on Bureau of
full approval as a direct final rule recommends that you include your Reclamation Facilities, Lands, and
without prior proposal because the name and other contact information in Waterbodies; Inclusion of Hoover Dam
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS

Agency views this as a noncontroversial the body of your comment and with any AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation,
submittal and anticipates no adverse disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA Interior.
comments. A detailed rationale for the cannot read your comment due to ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
approval is set forth in the direct final technical difficulties and cannot contact
rule. If no adverse comments are you for clarification, EPA may not be SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
received in response to this action, no able to consider your comment. make public conduct at Hoover Dam
further activity is contemplated. If EPA Electronic files should avoid the use of subject to the same rules governing

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:43 Sep 27, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\28SEP1.SGM 28SEP1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen