Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 55287

(B) Utah Administrative Code rule Office’s normal hours of operation, and telephone Matt Rau, Environmental
R307–101–2, as adopted by the Utah Air special arrangements should be made Engineer, at (312) 886–6524 before
Quality Board on September 7, 2005, for deliveries of boxed information. The visiting the Region 5 office.
effective on September 8, 2005. This Regional Office’s official hours of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
incorporation by reference extends only business are Monday through Friday, Rau, Environmental Engineer, Criteria
to the definition of the Clearing Index 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch
and excludes any other provisions that holidays. (AR–18J), EPA Region 5, 77 West
R307–101–2 incorporates by reference. Instructions: Direct your comments to Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2006– 60604, (312) 886–6524,
[FR Doc. 06–7954 Filed 9–21–06; 8:45 am]
0543. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
made available online at Throughout this document whenever
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean, including any
AGENCY EPA. This supplementary information
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information section is arranged as follows:
40 CFR Part 52
claimed to be Confidential Business I. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My
[EPA–R05–OAR–2006–0543; FRL–8217–8] Information (CBI) or other information, Comments for EPA?
the disclosure of which is restricted by II. What Is EPA Approving?
Approval and Promulgation of Air statute. Do not submit information that III. What Is the Background for This Action?
Quality Implementation Plans; you consider to be CBI or otherwise IV. What Is EPA’s Analysis of the State
Wisconsin protected through Submission?
or e-mail. The Web V. What Are the Environmental Effects of
AGENCY: Environmental Protection This Action?
Agency (EPA). site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
VI. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?
ACTION: Direct final rule.
which means that EPA will not know VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.
your identity or contact information
SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to unless you provide it in the body of I. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
the Wisconsin State Implementation your comment. If you send an e-mail My Comments for EPA?
Plan (SIP) for ozone. In these revisions, comment directly to EPA without going A. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
the State has incorporated changes EPA through, your information to EPA through
made to its definition of volatile organic e-mail address will be automatically or e-mail. Clearly
compound (VOC) and its VOC control captured and included as part of the mark the part or all of the information
requirements for yeast manufacturing. comment that is placed in the public that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
As a result of EPA’s approval, five docket and made available on the information in a disk or CD–ROM that
chemical compounds will no longer be Internet. If you submit an electronic you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
considered VOCs. The changes to VOC comment, EPA recommends that you disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
control requirements match the EPA include your name and other contact identify electronically within the disk or
maximum achievable control information in the body of your
CD–ROM the specific information that
technology (MACT) limits for yeast comment and with any disk or CD-ROM
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
manufacturers. you submit. If EPA cannot read your
complete version of the comment that
comment due to technical difficulties
DATES: This direct final rule will be includes information claimed as CBI, a
and cannot contact you for clarification,
effective November 21, 2006, unless copy of the comment that does not
EPA may not be able to consider your
EPA receives adverse comments by contain the information claimed as CBI
comment. Electronic files should avoid
October 23, 2006. If adverse comments must be submitted for inclusion in the
the use of special characters, any form
are received, EPA will publish a timely public docket. Information so marked
of encryption, and be free of any defects
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the will not be disclosed except in
or viruses. For additional instructions
Federal Register informing the public on submitting comments, go to accordance with procedures set forth in
that the rule will not take effect. Section I of the SUPPLEMENTARY 40 CFR part 2.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, INFORMATION section of this document.
B. Tips for Preparing Your Comments.
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– Docket: All documents in the docket When submitting comments, remember
OAR–2006–0543, by one of the are listed in the to:
following methods: index. Although listed in the index, • Identify the rulemaking by docket
• Follow the some information is not publicly number and other identifying
on-line instructions for submitting available, e.g., CBI or other information information (subject heading, Federal
comments. the disclosure of which is restricted by Register date and page number).
• E-mail: statute. Certain other material, such as • Explain why you agree or disagree;
• Fax: (312) 886–5824. copyrighted material, will be publicly suggest alternatives and substitute
• Mail: John M. Mooney, Chief, available only in hard copy. Publicly language for your requested changes.
Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR–18J), available docket materials are available • Describe any assumptions and
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, either electronically in provide any technical information and/
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, or in hard copy at or data that you used.
Illinois 60604. the Environmental Protection Agency, • If you estimate potential costs or
• Hand Delivery: John M. Mooney, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 burdens, explain how you arrived at
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_1

Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR– West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, your estimate in sufficient detail to
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Illinois 60604. This Facility is open allow for it to be reproduced.
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday • Provide specific examples to
Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries through Friday, excluding legal illustrate your concerns, and suggest
are only accepted during the Regional holidays. We recommend that you alternatives.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:03 Sep 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM 22SER1
55288 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

• Explain your views as clearly as recordkeeping, emissions reporting, compounds being removed from the
possible, avoiding the use of profanity modeling, and inventory VOC VOC list, ozone formation may be
or personal threats. requirements. reduced.
• Make sure to submit your Wisconsin also requested VOC control Exposure to HAPs at sufficient
comments by the comment period requirement revisions to match yeast concentration and duration may
deadline identified. manufacturing limits. The May 21, 2001 increase the risk of cancer and other
II. What Is EPA Approving? national emission standards for serious health effects. These health
hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for effects include damage to the immune
EPA is approving revisions to nutritional yeast manufacturing (66 FR system and neurological, reproductive,
Wisconsin’s VOC definitions for five 27876) set limits on VOC emissions. The developmental, and respiratory health
compounds and VOC control yeast NESHAP limits VOC emissions as problems. Drinking water can be
requirements for yeast manufacturing a surrogate for emissions of contaminated by HAPs. In addition,
facilities. Wisconsin added NR acetaldehyde, a hazardous air pollutant some HAPs can enter the food chain
400.02(162)(a)45 to 48, which excludes that is also a VOC. The limits affect both through the exposure of crops and
the four VOC compounds from the VOC concentration limits and a percent- animals. The VOC limits placed on
definition of VOCs: 1,1,1,2,2,3,3- of-batches minimum. At least 98 percent yeast manufacturing facilities will limit
heptafluoro-3-methoxy-propane; 3- of the batches on a 12-month rolling HAP emissions.
ethoxy-1,1,1,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6- average must meet the VOC
dodecafluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl) VI. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?
concentration limit.
hexane; 1,1,1,2,3,3,3- EPA is approving, through direct final
heptafluoropropane; and methyl formate IV. What Is EPA’s Analysis of the State rulemaking, revisions to the Wisconsin
(HCOOCH3). Sources of the compounds Submission? ozone regulations. As a result of EPA’s
listed under NR 400.02(162)(a) do not The changes to Wisconsin’s definition approval of Wisconsin’s SIP submission,
have to follow any of these VOC of VOC parallel the revisions to 40 CFR four compounds are no longer
requirements when using the 51.100(s)(1), the de-listing of four considered to be VOCs and a fifth
compounds. compounds formerly considered VOCs compound is not subject to VOC content
In addition, Wisconsin has added NR and to 40 CFR 51.100(s)(5), the and emission limits but will still be
400.02(162)(b), which states that t-butyl modification of the definition of VOC subject to other requirements. The VOC
acetate will no longer be subject to VOC concerning t-butyl acetate. control requirements for yeast
emission or content limits. Sources EPA revised the VOC emission limits manufacturing facilities were also
using t-butyl acetate will still need to for nutritional yeast manufacturing revised.
follow VOC recordkeeping, emission facilities in 40 CFR 63 subpart CCCC We are publishing this action without
reporting, and inventory requirements. (63.2130–2192). Wisconsin revised and prior proposal because we view this as
Wisconsin has also revised its VOC added sections to its rules that make the a noncontroversial amendment and
control requirements for yeast same revisions. Emission limit anticipate no adverse comments.
manufacturing facilities. This includes compliance is required for at least 98 However, in the proposed rules section
the addition of NR 424.05(2)(c), which percent of batches over a rolling 12- of this Federal Register publication, we
creates the requirement that sources month period. are publishing a separate document that
must comply with the emissions limits The requested revisions match will serve as the proposal to approve the
for at least 98 percent of all fermentation changes made to federal regulations. state plan if relevant adverse written
batches over a rolling 12 month period. Therefore, the modifications are comments are filed. This rule will be
III. What Is the Background for This approvable as revisions to Wisconsin’s effective November 21, 2006 without
Action? SIP. further notice unless we receive relevant
V. What Are the Environmental Effects adverse written comments by October
Wisconsin’s requested revisions to the
of This Action? 23, 2006. If we receive such comments,
VOC definitions adopt changes that EPA
we will withdraw this action before the
made on November 29, 2004. In the first Volatile organic compounds are
effective date by publishing a
action (69 FR 69298), EPA added four precursors to ozone formation. Complex
subsequent document that will
chemicals to the list of excluded photochemical reactions involving
withdraw the final action. All public
compounds at 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1), on VOCs form tropospheric ozone.
comments received will then be
the basis that these compounds make a Ozone decreases lung function,
addressed in a subsequent final rule
negligible contribution to tropospheric causing chest pain and coughing. It can
based on the proposed action. The EPA
ozone formation. These are: aggravate asthma, reduce lung capacity,
will not institute a second comment
1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-methoxy- and increase risk of respiratory diseases
period. Any parties interested in
propane; 3-ethoxy- like pneumonia and bronchitis.
commenting on this action should do so
1,1,1,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-dodecafluoro-2- Children playing outside and healthy
at this time. If we do not receive any
(trifluoromethyl) hexane; 1,1,1,2,3,3,3- adults who work or exercise outside
comments, this action will be effective
heptafluoropropane; and methyl also may be harmed by elevated ozone
November 21, 2006.
formate. levels. Ozone also reduces vegetation
In the second action (69 FR 69304), growth in economically important VII. Statutory and Executive Order
EPA modified the definition of VOC at agricultural crops and wild plants. Reviews
40 CFR 51.100(s)(5) to exclude t-butyl EPA has determined that the five
acetate as a VOC for purposes of VOC compounds make a negligible Executive Order 12866; Regulatory
emission limitations or VOC content contribution to ozone formation. Thus, Planning and Review
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_1

requirements. While EPA determined the compounds are no longer Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
that t-butyl acetate has a negligible considered to be VOCs and the 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
contribution to tropospheric ozone exemptions will not harm the air not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
formation, it also concluded that the quality. In fact if sources switch from a therefore is not subject to review by the
compound should still be subject to all VOC compound to one of the Office of Management and Budget.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:03 Sep 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM 22SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 55289

Executive Order 13211: Actions That Executive Order 13045 Protection of review may be filed, and shall not
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Children From Environmental Health postpone the effectiveness of such rule
Distribution, or Use and Safety Risks or action. This action may not be
This rule also is not subject to challenged later in proceedings to
Because it is not a ‘‘significant enforce its requirements. (See section
Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
regulatory action’’ under Executive 307(b)(2).)
Children from Environmental Health
Order 12866 or a ‘‘significant energy
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
action,’’ this action is also not subject to
April 23, 1997), because it is not
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Environmental protection, Air
economically significant.
Concerning Regulations That pollution control, Incorporation by
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, National Technology Transfer reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May Advancement Act Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.
22, 2001). In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s Dated: August 23, 2006.
Regulatory Flexibility Act role is to approve state choices, Jerri-Anne Garl,
provided that they meet the criteria of Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
This action merely approves state law the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement ■ For the reasons stated in the preamble,
as meeting Federal requirements and
for the state to use voluntary consensus part 52, chapter I, of title 40 of the Code
imposes no additional requirements of Federal Regulations is amended as
beyond those imposed by state law. standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for follows:
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies
that this rule will not have a significant failure to use VCS. It would thus be PART 52—[AMENDED]
economic impact on a substantial inconsistent with applicable law for
number of small entities under the EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 to use VCS in place of a SIP submission continues to read as follows:
et seq.). that otherwise satisfies the provisions of Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act requirements of section 12(d) of the Subpart YY—Wisconsin
National Technology Transfer and
Because this rule approves pre- Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. ■ 2. Section 52.2570 is amended by
existing requirements under state law 272 note) do not apply. adding paragraph (c)(114) to read as
and does not impose any additional follows:
enforceable duty beyond that required Paperwork Reduction Act
by state law, it does not contain any § 52.2570 Identification of plan.
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate or significantly or information collection burden under the * * * * *
uniquely affect small governments, as provisions of the Paperwork Reduction (c) * * *
described in the Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). (114) On April 11, 2006, Wisconsin
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). submitted revised regulations that
Congressional Review Act match 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1), as amended
Executive Order 13175 Consultation The Congressional Review Act, 5 at 69 FR 69298. As a result, the
and Coordination With Indian Tribal U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small compounds, 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-
Governments Business Regulatory Enforcement methoxy-propane, 3-ethoxy-
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 1,1,1,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-dodecafluoro-2-
This rule also does not have tribal (trifluoromethyl)hexane, 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-
that before a rule may take effect, the
implications because it will not have a heptafluoropropane, and methyl
agency promulgating the rule must
substantial direct effect on one or more formate, are added to the list of
submit a rule report, which includes a
Indian tribes, on the relationship ‘‘nonphotochemically reactive
copy of the rule, to each House of the
between the Federal government and hydrocarbons’’ or ‘‘negligibly
Congress and to the Comptroller General
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of of the United States. EPA will submit a photochemically reactive compounds’’
power and responsibilities between the report containing this rule and other in NR 400.02(162)(a)45. to 48.
Federal government and Indian tribes, required information to the U.S. Senate, Companies producing or using the four
as specified by Executive Order 13175 the U.S. House of Representatives, and compounds will no longer need to
(59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000). the Comptroller General of the United follow the VOC rules for these
Executive Order 13132 Federalism States prior to publication of the rule in compounds. Section NR 400.02(162)(b)
the Federal Register. A major rule was added for the compound t-butyl
This action also does not have cannot take effect until 60 days after it acetate. It is not considered a VOC for
Federalism implications because it does is published in the Federal Register. emission limits and content
not have substantial direct effects on the This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as requirements. T-butyl acetate will still
states, on the relationship between the defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). be considered a VOC for the
national government and the states, or Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean recordkeeping, emissions reporting, and
on the distribution of power and Air Act, petitions for judicial review of inventory requirements. Wisconsin also
responsibilities among the various this action must be filed in the United added and modified sections of NR
levels of government, as specified in States Court of Appeals for the 424.05, its VOC control requirements for
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, appropriate circuit by November 21, yeast manufacturing facilities.
August 10, 1999). This action merely 2006. Filing a petition for Wisconsin’s requirements are the same
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_1

approves a state rule implementing a reconsideration by the Administrator of as the federal requirements in the
Federal standard, and does not alter the this final rule does not affect the finality national emission standards for
relationship or the distribution of power of this rule for the purposes of judicial hazardous air pollutants for nutritional
and responsibilities established in the review nor does it extend the time yeast manufacturing.
Clean Air Act. within which a petition for judicial (i) Incorporation by reference.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:03 Sep 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM 22SER1
55290 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

(A) Wisconsin Administrative Code Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
§ NR 400: Air Pollution Control Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S. Request?
Definitions, Section 2: Definitions, Crystal Drive Arlington, VA. The hours Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as
Subsection 162: ‘‘Volatile organic of operation of this Docket Facility are amended by the FQPA, any person may
compound,’’ and § NR 424: Control of from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday file an objection to any aspect of this
Organic Compound Emissions from through Friday, excluding legal regulation and may also request a
Process Lines, Section 5: Yeast holidays. The Docket telephone number hearing on those objections. The EPA
Manufacturing, Subsection 2: Emission is (703) 305-5805. procedural regulations which govern the
Limitations, and Subsection 5: Test
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: submission of objections and requests
Methods and Procedures. The
Andrea Conrath, Registration Division for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178.
regulations were effective on January 1,
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, You must file your objection or request
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 a hearing on this regulation in
[FR Doc. 06–8113 Filed 9–21–06; 8:45 am] accordance with the instructions
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460-0001; telephone number: provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
(703) 308-9356; e-mail address: proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OPP-2006-0773 in the subject line on
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the first page of your submission. All
40 CFR Part 180 requests must be in writing, and must be
I. General Information mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0773; FRL–8093–3] on or before November 21, 2006.
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
In addition to filing an objection or
Fenamidone; Pesticide Tolerance for You may be potentially affected by hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
Emergency Exemption this action if you are an agricultural as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
AGENCY: Environmental Protection producer, food manufacturer, or submit a copy of the filing that does not
Agency (EPA). pesticide manufacturer. Potentially contain any CBI for inclusion in the
ACTION: Final rule. affected entities may include, but are public docket that is described in
not limited to: ADDRESSES. Information not marked
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
time-limited tolerance for residues of may be disclosed publicly by EPA
fenamidone in or on carrots. This action • Animal production (NAICS code without prior notice. Submit your
is in response to EPA’s granting of an 112). copies, identified by docket ID number
emergency exemption under section 18 • Food manufacturing (NAICS code EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0773, by one of the
of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, 311). following methods:
and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
authorizing use of the pesticide on Follow the on-line
code 32532).
carrots. This regulation establishes a instructions for submitting comments.
maximum permissible level for residues This listing is not intended to be • Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
of fenamidone in this food commodity. exhaustive, but rather provides a guide (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
The tolerance expires and is revoked on for readers regarding entities likely to be Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
December 31, 2009. affected by this action. Other types of Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DATES: This regulation is effective entities not listed in this unit could also DC 20460-0001.
September 22, 2006. Objections and be affected. The North American • Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
requests for hearings must be received Industrial Classification System Docket (7502P), Environmental
on or before November 21, 2006, and (NAICS) codes have been provided to Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One
must be filed in accordance with the assist you and others in determining Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S.
instructions provided in 40 CFR part whether this action might apply to Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the certain entities. If you have any are only accepted during the Docket’s
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). questions regarding the applicability of normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a this action to a particular entity, consult 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
docket for this action under docket the person listed under FOR FURTHER excluding legal holidays). Special
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ- INFORMATION CONTACT.
arrangements should be made for
OPP-2006-0773. All documents in the B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies deliveries of boxed information. The
docket are listed on the of this Document? Docket telephone number is (703) 305-
website. Although listed in the index, 5805.
some information is not publicly In addition to accessing an electronic
available, e.g., Confidential Business copy of this Federal Register document II. Background and Statutory Findings
Information (CBI) or other information through the electronic docket at http:// EPA, on its own initiative, in
whose disclosure is restricted by statute., you may access accordance with sections 408(e) and 408
Certain other material, such as this Federal Register document (l)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
copyrighted material, is not placed on electronically through the EPA Internet Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a,
the Internet and will be publicly under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at is establishing a time-limited tolerance
available only in hard copy form. You may for residues of the fungicide
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_1

Publicly available docket materials are also access a frequently updated fenamidone, (4H-imidazol-4-one, 3,5-
available either in the electronic docket electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 dihydro-5-methyl-2-(methylthio)-5-
at, or, if only through the Government Printing phenyl-3-(phenylamino), (S)-), in or on
available in hard copy, at the Office of Office’s pilot e-CFR site at http:// carrot at 0.20 parts per million (ppm).
Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory This tolerance expires and is revoked on

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:03 Sep 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM 22SER1