Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The University of Chicago Press, Smithsonian American Art Museum, The Smithsonian Institution are
collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Art.
http://www.jstor.org
Vija Celmins, Moon Surface (Surveyor 1), 197172. Graphite on acrylic ground on paper, 14 x 181/2 in.
The Museum of Modern Art, New York, Gift of Edward R. Broida 2009 Vija Celmins. Photo,
McKee Gallery, New York
37
American Art
Spring 2009
American Art
Rauschenberg, who had already incorporated numerous references to the exploration of space in his prints before being
asked to join the NASA Art Program, was
one of seven artists who witnessed the
blastoff of Apollo 11 in July 1969. Based
on both his firsthand experience and his
access to NASAs photographic archive, he
produced thirty-three lithographs titled
the Stoned Moon Series, which included
references to the Apollo 11 astronauts,
their spacecraft, the Kennedy Space
Center, and the NASA control center.
Sky Garden (fig. 2), the most ambitious
print in the series, is nearly seven and one
half feet tall. At the center of the print
and reaching its entire height is a labeled
diagram of the Saturn rocket with the
Apollo spacecraft at its apex. The faces
of two men, one a famous scientist and
the other unidentified, appear on the
right edge of the soaring rocket, and an
egret, lake, and palm trees, typical of the
landscape around the space center, form
a blue arc above the fiery red body of
the rocket. Though working in a more
abstract mode than most of the artists
commissioned by NASA, Rauschenberg
joined many of his realist colleagues not
only in documenting specific benchmarks
in the space race but also in demystifying
technology with references to people and
nature. Goodyear suggests that even the
choice to privilege the graphic artist over
the mechanical camera as a tool of public
history making humanized the space
program.4
In the 1960s many commentators
echoed NASAs belief that artists could
redeem science and technology with their
special, creative insights, interjecting a
dose of imagination into the realm of
objective theorems. Numerous exhibitions
and books document the widespread
collaboration that was undertaken in
that decade with the assumption that
the artist could shed an intuitive light on
science or produce an aesthetic experience
with technological means. The artist was
charged with bridging the chasm between
Spring 2009
41
American Art
4 J. R. Eyerman, Technicians at
Work, 1966. Photograph. National
Geographic Image Collection
5 Rick Hall, Surveyor 1 spacecraft, 1966. Acrylic. National
Geographic Image Collection
6 Davis Meltzer, Surveyor blastoff
and Surveyor beaming messages to
earth, 1966. National Geographic
Image Collection
Spring 2009
American Art
Spring 2009
American Art
Spring 2009
American Art
Spring 2009
49
American Art
Spring 2009
American Art
Spring 2009
American Art
Notes
My thanks to Rachael DeLue and Nancy Troy,
who invited me to present shortened versions of this essay at, respectively, Princeton
University in May 2007 and the College Art
Association Annual Conference in Dallas in
February 2008. I am particularly grateful for
the insights of four anonymous readers for
American Art and to the critical yet enthusiastic comments I received from Jim Herbert and
Sarah Whiting.
1 Reviews of the show disagree as to
whether fourteen or fifteen drawings
were on view. See Peter Plagens, Vija
Celmins, Artforum 8 (March 1970):
84, who says fourteen; and Joseph E.
Young, Los Angeles, Art International 14
(March 1970): 86, who says fifteen.
2 The Luna 9 and Surveyor 1 missions
received focused news coverage in the
following two articles: Right Down on
the Moon, Life, February 11, 1966, 26
54
Spring 2009
55
6 The quotes from Newell are from Surveyor: Candid Camera on the Moon,
578, 582. In this same article, Newell
refers to Surveyor 1 as cyclops, robot,
and human. The quote from Life is
from Right Down on the Moon, 27.
7 Newell, Surveyor: Candid Camera on
the Moon, 582.
8 Samuel Weber, Mass Mediauras: Forms,
Technics, Media (Palo Alto: Stanford Univ.
Press, 1996), 115.
9 Jodi Dean explores the importance NASA
placed on verifying the Apollo 11 mission
with televised images. Demonstrating
open access to information was, as Dean
points out, a means of distinguishing the
United States from the Soviet Union.
Dean, Aliens in America: Conspiracy Cultures from Outerspace to Cyberspace (Ithaca,
N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Press, 1998), 6297.
10 Manfred Clynes and Nathan Kline,
Cyborgs and Space, Astronautics, September 1960, 26. On the astronauts as
cyborgs, see Dean, Aliens in America, 95.
11 Jeffrey Sconce, Haunted Media: Electronic Presence from Telegraphy to Television (Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press,
2000).
12 The exact date and whereabouts of the
photograph of the Human Television are
unknown. Doug Michels died in 2003,
but media artist and scholar Chip Lord,
who used the Human Television for a
poster in 1983, has in his files correspondence from Michels dating the image to
about 1976. Margaret Morse analyzes the
fictions of presence in television viewing
and specifically discusses the relation
between the television anchor and the
viewer in Virtualities: Television, Media
Art, and Cyberculture (Bloomington:
Indiana Univ. Press, 1998).
13 On Nam June Paik, see John G. Hanhardts Nam June Paik (New York:
Whitney Museum of American Art,
1982); and his The Worlds of Nam June
Paik (New York: Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, 2000); Hanhardt
and Caitlin Jones, Global Groove 2004
(New York: Guggenheim Museum Publications, 2004); Wulf Herzogenrath
and Sabine Maria Schmidt, Nam June
Paik: Fluxus/Video (Bremen: Kunsthalle
Bremen, 1999); David Joselit, Feedback:
Television against Democracy (Cambridge,
Mass.: MIT Press, 2007); and Toni Stooss
and Thomas Kellein, eds., Nam June
American Art