51850 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices

Representatives of any other Indian Dated: August 14, 2006. United States International Trade
tribe that believes itself to be culturally Sherry Hutt, Commission (Commission) determines,2
affiliated with the unassociated funerary Manager, National NAGPRA Program. pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
objects should contact Dr. Peter Lape, [FR Doc. 06–7278 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am] Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the
Burke Museum, University of BILLING CODE 4312–50–M Act), that revocation of the antidumping
Washington, Box 353010, Seattle, WA duty orders on the following types of
98195–3010, telephone (206) 685–2282, bearings from China, France, Germany,
October 2, 2006. Repatriation of the INTERNATIONAL TRADE Japan, and the United Kingdom would
unassociated funerary objects to the COMMISSION be likely to lead to continuation or
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–344, 391–A, recurrence of material injury to an
Reservation, Oregon may proceed after 392–A and C, 393–A, 394–A, 396, and 399– industry in the United States within a
that date if no additional claimants A (Second Review)] reasonably foreseeable time.
come forward.
Certain Bearings From China, France,
The Burke Museum is responsible for
Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore, and
notifying the Confederated Tribes of the the United Kingdom
Umatilla Reservation, Oregon that this
notice has been published. Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the

Product Country Investigation No.

Tapered roller bearings ........................................................................................... China 3 .................................................... 731–TA–344

Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ France .................................................... 731–TA–392–A
Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Germany ................................................ 731–TA–391–A
Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Italy ......................................................... 731–TA–393–A
Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Japan ..................................................... 731–TA–394–A
Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ United Kingdom ..................................... 731–TA–399–A

The Commission also determines that bearings from France and Singapore injury to an industry in the United
revocation of the antidumping duty would not be likely to lead to States within a reasonably foreseeable
orders on the following types of continuation or recurrence of material time.

Product Country Investigation No.

Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Singapore 4 ............................................. 731–TA–396

Spherical plain bearings .......................................................................................... France 5 .................................................. 731–TA–392–C

Background Secretary of Commerce on August 25, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

2006. The views of the Commission are
The Commission instituted these Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent
reviews on June 1, 2005 (70 FR 31531) contained in USITC Publication 3876
(August 2006), entitled Certain Bearings Decree
and determined on September 7, 2005
that it would conduct full reviews (70 from China, France, Germany, Italy, In accordance with Departmental
FR 54568, September 15, 2005). Notice Japan, Singapore, and the United Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby
of the scheduling of the Commission’s Kingdom: Investigation Nos. 731–TA– given that a proposed Consent Decree in
reviews and of a public hearing to be 344, 391–A, 392–A and C, 393–A, 394– United States v. Howard McKenzie &
held in connection therewith was given A, and 399–A (Second Review). EBT Property Holding Co., Inc., No.
by posting copies of the notice in the By order of the Commission. 2:06–CV–02353, was lodged with the
Office of the Secretary, U.S. Issued: August 28, 2006. United States District Court for the
International Trade Commission, District of South Carolina on August 23,
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Washington, DC, and by publishing the 2006.
notice in the Federal Register on Secretary to the Commission. The proposed Consent Decree
October 18, 2005 (70 FR 60556).6 The [FR Doc. 06–7350 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am] concerns a compliant filed by the
hearing was held in Washington, DC, on BILLING CODE 7020–02–P United States against Howard McKenzie
May 2, 2006, and all persons who & EBT Property Holding Co., Inc.,
requested the opportunity were pursuant to sections 301 and 404 of the
permitted to appear in person or by Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311 and
counsel. 1344, with respect to Defendants’
The Commission transmitted its alleged violations of the Clean Air Act
determination in this review to the by discharging pollutants into waters of
erjones on PROD1PC72 with NOTICES

1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 3 Chairman Daniel R. Pearson dissenting. 6 The schedule of the Commission’s reviews and

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 4 Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane dissenting. of the public hearing was revised on December 9,
CFR 207.2(f)). 5 Commissioners Stephen Koplan and Charlotte 2005 (70 FR 75482, December 20, 2005) and on May
2 Commissioner Deanna Tanner Okun not
R. Lane dissenting. 4, 2006 (71 FR 27513, May 11, 2006).
participating.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:29 Aug 30, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices
the United States without a permit. The
proposed Consent Decree resolves these
allegations by requiring the restoration
of the wetlands at issue and the
payment of a civil penalty. The
Department of Justice will accept
written comments relating to this
proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30)
days from the date of publication of this
Notice. Please address comments to
Marvin J. Caughman, Assistant United
States Attorney, Wachovia Building,
Suite 500, 1441 Main Street, Columbia,
South Carolina 29201 and refer to
United States v. Howard McKenzie &
EBT Property Holding Co., Inc., No.
2:06–CV–02353.
The proposed Consent Decree may be
examined at the Clerk’s Office, United
States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, United States
Courthouse, 901 Richland Lane,
Columbia, South Carolina. In addition,
the proposed Consent Decree may be
viewed at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
open.html.
Stephen Samuels,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense
Section, Environment & Natural Resources
Division.
[FR Doc. 06–7265 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Pursuant to the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act
Notice is hereby given that on
August 23, 2006 a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Mallinckrodt
et. al, Civil Action No. 4:02CV1488, was
lodged with the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of
Missouri. In this action the United
States sought recovery of response costs
incurred by the Environmental
Protection Agency at the Great Lakes
Container Corporation Superfund Site
located in St. Louis, Missouri. The
Consent Decree requires Defendant
Shell Oil Company to reimburse the
United States $228,630.00 in response
costs.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
relating to the Consent Decree.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
erjones on PROD1PC72 with NOTICES
Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
States v. Mallinckrodt, et. al. D.J. Ref.
90–11–3–07280. The Consent Decree
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:29 Aug 30, 2006 Jkt 208001
may be examined at the Office of the
United States Attorney, Thomas F.
Eagleton U.S. Courthouse, 111 South
10th Street, 20th Floor, St. Louis, MO
63102, and at U.S. EPA Region VII, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66025. During the public comment
period, the Consent Decree may also be
examined on the following Department
of Justice Web site, to http://www/
usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decree.html. A
copy of the Consent Decree may also be
obtained by mail from the Consent
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a
request to Tonia Fleetwood
(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a
copy from the Consent Decree Library,
please enclose a check in the amount of
$4.75 (without attachments) or $5.75
(with attachments) for United States v.
Mallinckrodt, et al. (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the U.S.
Treasury.
Bruce Gelber,
Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement
Section, Environment and Natural Resources
Division.
[FR Doc. 06–7295 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Extension of Comment
Period on Consent Decree Under the
Clean Water Act
Under 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby
given that the comment period for the
purposed Consent Decree lodged on
June 22, 2006, with the United States
District Court for the District of Puerto
Rico in United States v. Puerto Rico
Aqueduct and Sewer Authority
(PRASA), Civil Action No. 06–1624
(SEC), is being extended from August 7,
2006 through September 15, 2006. The
original notice of this proposed
settlement, which summarizes the
settlement and identifies where copies
of the Consent Decree may be obtained,
was published in the Federal Register
on July 7, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 130, Pg.
38660–38661. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General of the Environment and Natural
Resources Division, Department of
Justice, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department
of Justice, Washington, DC 20004–7611,
and should refer to United States v.
PRASA, Civil Action No. 06–1624
(SEC), D.J. Ref. 90–5–1–1–08385, and
PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
51851
should be received by September 15,
2006.
Bruce S. Gelber,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section,
Environment and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 06–7296 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
Notice is hereby given that on August
15, 2006, a proposed Consent Decree in
United States v. The Sherwin-Williams
Company et al., Civil Action Number
00–2064, was lodged with the United
States District Court for the Central
District of Illinois.
The proposed consent decree resolves
claims against The Sherwin-Williams
Company, The Glidden Company, and
Speciality Coatings Company, Inc.
(collectively, ‘‘Defendants’’), under
Section 107 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607, for the
reimbursement of response costs
incurred and to be incurred by EPA, in
connection with the release and
threatened release of hazardous
substances at the Cross Brothers Pail
Recycling Superfund Site in Pembroke
Township, Kankakee County, Illinois
(‘‘the Site’’).
Under the proposed Consent Decree,
Defendants will reimburse the United
States $200,000 in outstanding past
response costs at the Site.
The Department of Justice will
receive, for a period of thirty (30) days
from the date of this publication,
comments relating to the Consent
Decree. Comments should be addressed
to the Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, with a copy to Matthew A.
Fogelson, Trial Attorney, U.S.
Department of Justice, Environment and
Natural Resources Division,
Environmental Enforcement Section,
301 Howard Street, Suite 1050, San
Francisco, CA 94105, and should refer
to United States v. The Sherwin-
Williams Company et al., DOJ Ref. #90–
11–2–477/1. Commenters may request
an opportunity for a public meeting in
the affected area, in accordance with
Section 7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6973(d).
The Consent Decree may be examined
at the Office of the United States
31AUN1