Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
O c c l u s a l features of the Class II malocclusion during the transition from the deciduous to
the mixed dentition have been investigated by several authors in the past. For example, Fr6hlich 1
reported that no improvement of Class II occlusal
relationship occurs from 5 to 12 years of age.
Moyers and Wainright2 stated that a distal step in
aPostdoctoral resident, Department of Orthodontics, The University of
Florence.
bphD program in Preventive Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics,
The University of Florence.
Professor of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry; professor, Anatomy and Cell Biology, School of
Medicine; and research scientist, Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
aProfessor, Head and Chairman, Department of Orthodontics, The University of Florence.
Reprint requests to: Dr. Tiziano Baccetti, Istituto di Odonto-GnatoStomatologia, Universit~ degli Studi di Firenze, Via del Ponte di Mezzo,
46-48, 50127, Firenze, Italy.
Copyright 1997 by the American Association of Orthodontists.
0889-5406/97/$5.00 + 0 8/1/70559
502
Baccetti et al.
503
tion (during the mixed dentition; T2) , the mean age was 8
years and 1 month (+1 year, 2 months). All the subjects
did not undergo any orthodontic treatment during the
observation period. The interval considered averaged 2
years and 6 months _ 9 months in duration (Fig. 1).
The second group was comprised of 22 untreated
subjects (16 subjects from the University of Michigan
Growth Study and 6 subjects from the University of
Florence) with ideal occlusion 12 in the deciduous dentition (i.e., flush terminal plane, Class I deciduous canine
relationship, minimal overbite, and overjet). The sample
consisted of 9 boys and 13 girls. The mean age at first
observation (T 0 was 5 years and 5 months -+ 6 months;
the mean age at second observation (T2) was 7 years and
8 months + 9 months; the total observation period was 2
years and 4 months + 8 months in length.
Additional criteria for subject selection in both Class
II and Class I groups included an absence of caries, of
posterior and anterior crossbites, of congenitally missing
or supernumerary deciduous or permanent teeth, and of
cleft lip or cleft palate, and other syndromes.
Cast Analysis
The following measurements were performed on the
dental casts of the subjects of both Class II and control
groups at T~ and T2:
Overjet: The distance from the labial surface of the
lower central incisors to the incisal edge of the upper
central incisors.
Transverse relationships in the deciduous dentition
(Ta):
504 Baccetti et aL
PNS
2).
2. Mandibular deciduous intermolar width, intended
as the distance between the tips of the distobuccal
cusps of right and left first mandibular deciduous
molars (measurement 2 in Fig. 2).
3. Transverse Discrepancy (TD): The difference between maxillary and mandibular deciduous intermolar widths (measurement 1 subtracted from
measurement 2 in Fig. 2).
In subjects with ideal occlusion in the deciduous
dentition, the tips of the distobuccal cusps of mandibular
deciduous molars occlude in the central fossae of the
maxillary first deciduous molars. ~3
Transverse relationships in the mixed dentition (T2):
1. Maxillary intermolar width, measured as the distance between the central fossae of right and left
first maxillary permanent molars (measurement 3
in Fig. 2);
2. Mandibular intermolar width measured as the distance between the tips of the distobuccal cusps of
right and left first mandibular permanent molars
(measurement 4 in Fig. 2);
Cephalometric Analysis
Computer-assisted analysis of the serial lateral cephalograms of the two groups was carried out with a digitizer
(Numonics 2210, Numonics) and digitizing software
(Viewbox, ver. 1.8, as described by Halazonetis16). This
software program allowed magnification standardization
of the cephalograms from the two university sources. In
addition, each landmark was digitized twice to reduce
method error, as the average location of each cephalometric point was computed and used.
As stated in previous articles, 17'18 reference lines
should be traced through stable craniofacial structures in
longitudinal cephalometric studies on growing subjects.
Consequently, such a cephalometric reference system w a s
adopted (Fig. 3):
1. Stable Basicranial Line (SBL). This line is traced
505
B a c c e t t i el al.
Class H group
(n = 25)
(n
Cast measurements
Mean
SD
Median
Max.
31.05
33.84
-2.79
5.84
2.40
2.25
1.06
2.32
31.1
33.6
-2.6
5.4
36.2
37.9
- 1.6
10.1
42.31
46.44
-4.09
6.73
2.33
3.09
3.03
2.45
42.2
46
-2.7
6
46.2
53.5
-1.8
13.4
Min.
22)
Mann-Whitney test
Mean
SD
Median
Max.
Min.
27.1
30.1
-6.4
3.1
33.90
33.88
-0.02
0.93
2.42
2.27
0.25
0.27
34
34
0
0.9
38
38
0.3
1.5
27.2
27.3
-0.4
0.4
4.354
0.281
5.86I
-5.861
<0.001
ns
<0.001
<0.001
38.2
40.6
13.1
3.5
45.25
45.40
-0.09
2.02
2.28
2.5
0.43
0.23
44.9
45
0
2.05
49.4
49
0.5
2.4
41.4
42
-0.7
1.7
3.666
1.132
5.859
-5.860
<0.001
ns
<0.001
<0.001
Data Analysis
The data from dental cast analysis of the two groups
were compared by means of a nonparametric test (MannWhitney U test 22,23) for independent samples (p < 0.05) at
T 1 and T 2. The cephalometric data of the Class II group
were compared with those of Class I group with a
Mann-Whitney U test at the time of the first observation.
RESULTS
Occlusal Findings
Descriptive data and statistical comparison for
occlusal features in Class II and Class I samples at
T1 (deciduous dentition) and at T2 (mixed dentition) are reported in Table I.
Deciduous dentition (T1). All the subjects with
Class I1 malocclusion in the deciduous dentition
showed a negative transverse discrepancy between
maxillary and mandibular deciduous intermolar
widths (-2.8 _+ 1.1 ram). As expected in subjects with
ideal occlusion, 13 T D was very close to zero in
control group. The comparison of the values for
maxillary deciduous intermolar width between Class
II and ideal Class I groups revealed a significantly
narrower maxillary width (p < 0.001) in Class II
children. No statistically significant difference was
assessed for the mandibular deciduous intermolar
width. Overjet was significantly larger (p < 0.001) in
Class II group in comparison to controls. M e a n
506
Baccetti et al.
Cephalometric
rneasurernents
A-VertT (mm)
B-VertT (ram)
Goi-VertT (ram)
Co-Pg (ram)
Co-Goi (ram)
Goi-Pg (ram)
Ba-T-VertT (degrees)
Ar-T-VertT (degrees)
ML-SBL (degrees)
NL-SBL (degrees)
NL-ML (degrees)
Ar-Goi-Me (degrees)
CondAx-SBL (degrees)
CondAx-ML (degrees)
Min.
57.57
46.09
9.05
88.08
42.61
59.39
38.48
33.47
27.64
-0.77
28.17
129.98
69.44
138.09
3.75
4.18
5.27
3.32
3.14
4.02
4.59
5.39
5.41
4.23
4.01
6.30
7.01
6.54
57.93
47.26
9.07
88.03
42.76
59.15
38.74
33.69
27.66
0.11
29.04
132.04
68.96
137.67
65.37
53.43
24.53
96.22
48.82
68.91
49.97
45.36
37.91
6.43
35.09
142.02
82.43
128.18
51.38
37.51
-1.23
82.36
37.19
51.48
30.51
23.58
17.49
-9.32
20.08
112.11
51.00
152.30
60.73
48.78
10.00
92.91
45.01
63.68
37.23
32.49
25.73
-1.11
26.85
128.36
68.46
138.11
3.86
4.73
6.00
4.19
3.51
4.41
5.36
5.89
5.45
4.19
4.03
5.34
5.28
4.80
59.45
48.11
9.61
93.04
44.40
63.86
37.33
33.32
26.06
-0.55
27.21
128.29
68.65
138.12
70.67
58.80
25.01
98.69
52.70
73.98
50.95
45.48
35.74
7.20
35.44
139.69
79.91
145.02
55.50
38.82
-1.36
84.21
38.50
55.27
27.02
21.28
15.47
-12.38
18.39
114.09
58.80
125.71
Cephalometric
measurements
A-VertT (mrn)
B-VertT (ram)
Goi-VertT (ram)
Co-Pg (mm)
Co-Goi (ram)
Goi-Pg (rnrn)
Ba-T-VertT (degrees)
Ar-T-VertT (degrees)
ML-SBL (degrees)
NL-SBL (degrees)
NL-ML (degrees)
Ar-Goi-Me (degrees)
CondAx-SBL (degrees)
CondAx-ML (degrees)
Min.
56.69
49.38
9.21
90.44
42.95
61.00
38.12
33.50
29.24
0.15
29.09
130.44
68.37
140.87
3.60
4.74
4.35
4.06
3.07
3.96
4.79
5.15
3.71
3.12
4.13
5.8
5.74
5.86
56.34
48.43
9.77
90.46
42.63
60.78
37.51
34.41
29.26
0.13
29.51
132.08
67.91
142.11
63.30
57.84'
16.91
99.28
49.54
67.16
45.76
40.16
30.49
5.30
34.07
139.48
77.71
149.24
49.50
41.87
-0.72
83.48
38.04
54.84
28.45
21.89
20.40
-5.05
17.03
122.00
59.70
125.61
58.38
51.86
11.14
96.85
45.99
66.79
37.33
33.06
27.99
0.65
27.33
126.96
71.46
136.53
4.00
5.49
4.72
3.82
2.71
3.63
5.25
5.79
4.22
3.06
4.47
5.21
8.16
6.74
58.23
50.20
12.01
97.04
45.66
66.41
36.52
33.24
28.22
0.35
28.21
128.54
71.66
137.39
65.54
64.28
21.72
104.71
51.92
73.26
45.88
41.16
34.19
6.71
34.09
134.71
91.47
146.58
49.83
42.88
0.98
88.90
42.22
60.64
28.21
21.27
16.57
-7.12
16.69
117.76
58.62
120.51
A significantly more retruded mandible (BVertT), associated with a shorter mandibular total
length (Co-Pg), was assessed in Class II subjects
(p < 0.05) at T 1. No other statistically significant
differences between Class II and Class I samples,
including vertical relationships and cranial base
angulation, were found in the deciduous dentition.
Craniofacial Changes from the Deciduous
Dentition Through the Mixed Dentition
Baccetti e t aL
507
Table IV. Descriptive statistics and statistical comparison of growth changes between Class II and control groups
Differences
second-first observations
Class I1"group (n = 25)
Cephalometric
measurements
A-VertT (mm)
B-VertT (mm)
Goi-VertT (mm)
Co-Pg (mm)
Co-Goi (ram)
Goi-Pg (ram)
Ba-T-VertT (degrees)
Ar-T-VertT (degrees)
ML-SBL (degrees)
NL-SBL (degrees)
NL-ML (degrees)
Ar-Goi-Me (degrees)
CondAx-SBL (degrees)
CondAx-ML (degrees)
Differences
second-first observations
control group (n = 22)
Mann-Whitney
test
Mean
SD
Median
Max.
Min.
Mean
SD
Median
Max.
Min.
3.58
2.69
0.94
4.38
2.40
4.12
-1.24
-0.97
-1.99
-0.46
-1.32
-1.22
-1.10
0.63
2.41
3.11
2.91
2.26
2.54
2.40
3.03
2.90
3.77
2.72
3.05
-1.46
6.96
6.65
3.37
3.08
0.82
4.64
2.34
3.58
-0.73
-0.62
-1.50
-0.32
-1.15
-1.46
0.47
0.21
9.73
8.92
7.27
8.49
9.97
7.86
7.09
3.59
6.28
5.37
7.43
5.75
14.46
12.86
-0.85
-2.65
3.89
-0.09
- 1.71
-2.51
-8.28
-8.69
-12.53
-6.40
-10.24
-5.43
-12.59
-12.99
1.22
2.74
1.93
6.91
3.41
5.79
-0.78
-0.44
-1.25
0.51
-1.76
-4.48
3.08
-4.41
4.26
5.46
4.29
3.90
2.47
3.06
5.91
6.04
0.81
3.83
3.71
6.41
6.92
6.12
1.48
3.10
1.69
5.91
3.21
6.11
-0.62
-0.26
=1.24
1.32
-2.69
-4.14
1.24
-2.56
6.64
14.20
12.64
15.38
8.56
11.19
9.93
13.28
0.02
9.38
7.14
4.17
18.92
5.07
-5.38
-8.31
-6.83
-1.18
- 1.57
-0.62
-11.33
-13.43
-3.83
-9.17
-10.54
-15.37
-8.57
-16.26
-2.142
0.138
-0.852
2.557
1.353
2.185
0.394
0.479
0.607
1.012
-0.991
-2.036
1.588
-2.185
p
*
ns
ns
**
ns
*
ns
ns
ns
ns
ns
*
ns
*
508
Baccetti et al.
Baccetti et aL
509