Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introduction
examines an
a method of "' .... ''' ..'''1,.''' ..''''
n.",nl'"fI ..,n
IS
or
and control. Although
(Jln. It Is
much of the
on
What s the lean approach and how s It different from traditional operations
practice?
What are the main elements
""""'U!I"","
operations?
j
;;tl
I
~
---------'~
Toyota operations and the overall philosophy of its approach
to lean synchronization. This ls what some have cailed the
,:r"",,,,r,,,,,f ""r'",rlrw of the
production system, 'namely,
that activities, connections and production flows in a Toyota
factory are rigidly
at the same time
nn,,,,,"'Hn,,,, are enormously flexible and adaptable. Activties
and processes are constanUy being
and
to a
level of
enabling the company to
continually innovate and improve',1
One influential study of Toyota identifed tour rules that
the
delivery and development activlties
wihin the company.l
~
~
!!1l\
Just-in-time (JiT)
A method DT planning and
control ond an operations
aims to meet
demand Instontaneously \IIlth
perfect qualit'! and no waste,
lIT
""1nI1J'1!
and no wastc.
Orders
Deliveries
Deliverjes
ollscures
intrinsic problems
Im)<,,,tnrll
and the consequences the problem will be prevented from spreading to the whole process.
However, contrast this position with that illustrated in the bottom process in Figure 15.2,
which is an extreme fonn of JIT. Here items are worked on and then passed directly to the
next stage 'just-in-time', Problems at any stage have a very different effect in such a process.
For example, now if stage A stops workng,
B will notce immediately and stage e very
500n after. Stage
problem ls now quickly exposed to the whole proce5s, alI of which ls
affected by the problem. One result of this i8 that
re5ponsibility for solving the problem
is no longer confined to the staff at stage A but 5 now shared by everyone. Thi8 considerably
of the problem being solved, if only beca use t 1S now too important to
improves
be ignored. In other words, by preventing nventory from accumulating benveen stages, the
operation has increased the chances of the intrinsic efficiency of the plant being improved.
Although smplified, this example highlights the differences benveen a traditional and a
to encourage high effidency, they take different
approach. Although they both
routes to dong so. Traditonal approaches seek to encourage efficiency by protecting each
part of the operation from disruption. Long, unintermpted mns are its ideal state. The JIT
approach takes the opposite view. Exposure of processes (although not suddenly, as in our
simplified example) to problems can both make them more evident and change the 'motivaas a
tion structure' the whole system tOVliards solving the problems. JIT se es
Hes over the processes and prevents problems being noticed.
The idea of obscuring effects of inventory is often illustrated diagrammatcally, as in Figure
15.3. The many problems oE fue operation are shown as rocks in a river bed which cannot be
seen because of the depth of the water. The water in
analogy represents the inventory in
the operation. Yet, even though the rocks cannot be seen, they slow the progress of the river's
flow and cause turbulence. Gradual1y redudng the depth of the water (inventory) exposes
the worst of the problems which can be resolved, after which the water 1S lowered further,
exposng more problems, and so on. The same argument can be used to characterize the
relationship between the stages of production on a larger scale, where each stage is a 'macro'
operation. Here stages A, B and e couId be a supplier operation, one's own operaton and a
customer's operation, respectvely.
15.3 ReduoinQ the level 01 lnventory (water) allows opel"ations management (the ship) to see the
problems in the operation (the rooks) and work to reduce them
Focus on high
utllizatlon""
Focus on
when needed
More stc,ppagE,s
because of
problems
More production
at eaoh
Extra
goes nto I n"",nt('\Y\i
beoause of continuing
stolPpa.ges at
Fewer stopp;ag.,s
Lower capacity
utllization, but
Low invento!)' so
No surpius
goes
nto invento!)'
VU\JvUV!
15.4 The different views of capacity utili:zation in (a) tl"aditional and (b) JIT apPl'oaohes to operatons
-8
set
The lean approach to managing operations i8 founded on doing the simple things well, on
gradually doing them better and (above all) on squeezing out waste every step of the way.
aften seen as
leading practitioner of the lean approach in Japan, the Toyota Motor
Company has developed a set of practices which has shaped what we now call1ean or JIT.
Sorne argue that the origins of JIT lie within Toyotas reaction to
'oil shock' of rising oil
prices in the
1970s. The need for improved manufacturing efficiencies that this provoked spurred Toyota to accelerate
JIT ideas which were already forming. These
developments by Toyota, and other Japanese manufacturers, were also encouraged by the
natonal cultural and economic circumstances. Japan's attitude towards waste ('make every
grain of
count'), together with lts position as a crowded and virtually naturally resourceless country, produced ideal conditions in which to devise an approach that emphasizes low
waste and high added value.
Three key
defme the lean philosophy that in turn underpins the techniques of JIT:
eliminatin of waste, the involvement of staff in the operation and the drive for continuous improvement. 4 We willlook at each briefly in turno
Eliminate waste
111
!nvolve everyone
Contnuous mprovement
111
111
TPM
Set-up reduction
Total people involvement
V[sibiliiy
JIT supply
JIT as a method of
planning and control
111
111
111
111
111
Pull scheduling
Kanban confrol
LeveHed scheduHng
Mixed modening
Synchronization
15.5 The lean philosophy of operations is the basis fol' JIT techniques that include
JIT methods of planning and control
Arguably the most significant part of the lean philosophy is its focus on the elmnation of
aIl forms of ,vaste. Waste can
defined as any activity which does not add value. Two
simple devces are commonly used in lean improvement. One, 'the seven forms of waste', s
concemed with identifying waste as the first step towards elimnating t; the other, 'the 5S's',
is a simple set of principIes for reducing waste.
Over-production. Produdng more than is immediately needed by the nen process in the
operation is the greatest so urce of waste according to Toyota.
Waiting time. Equipment effidency and labour efficiency are two popular measures which
are widely used to measure equipment and labour waiting time, respectively. Less obvious
is the amount waiting tme of items, disguised by operators who are kept busy producing W1P which s not needed at the time.
Transport. Moving items around the operation, together with the double and triple handling vVIP, does not add vaIue. Layout changes which bring processes doser together,
improvements in transport methods and workplace organization can aU reduce waste. .
Process. The process itself may be a source of waste. Some operations may exist only
because of poor component design or poor maintenance and so could be eliminated.
lnventory. All inventory should become a target for elimination. However, it lS only by
tackling the causes of inventory that it can be reduced.
Metion. An operator may Iook busy but sometmes no vaIue is being added by the work
Simplification
is a rich source of reduction in the waste of motion.
Defectives. Quality waste i8 often very significant operations. Total costs of quality are
much greater than has traditionaUy been considered and it is therefore more important to
attack the causes of such costs. This lS discussed further in Chapter 20.
The
The 5S's
The 5-S
comes odginally from Japan and although the translation lnto English
i8 approximate, they are generaUy taken to represent
foUowing:
Position things
what is needed.
a way that they can be easily reached whenever
Just-in-time principies can be taken to an extreme. When just-in-time ideas first stalied to
have an impact on operatlons practice in the West, some authorlties advocated the reduction of between-process inventories to zero. While in the long term this provides the
ultimate in motivation .101" operations managers to ensure the efficiency and reliability of
each proces::>
it does no admit tha possiblllty 01 soma processes always baing
intrinsically less than totally reliable. An alternative view is to allow imrentories (albe!t small
onas) around procass stages with hgher-han-averaga uncertainty. This a laast allows
sorne protection for the rest 01 the system. The same ideas apply to just-In-time delivary
betwaan factories. Tha Toyota Motor Corp., ofien seen as the eptoma of modem JIT, has
suffered from Its low inter-plant inventory policles. 80th the Kobe earthquaka and fires in
supplier plants have caused produotion a Toyota's main factorias ta olosa down for saveral
parts. Even in the best-regulatad networks, one can no!
days bacause 01 a shortage of
always account for such avans.
time
activities
Valua straam
stream mapping
,f
b -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~~
in a value
to Perkins 01
Key
TIT '" Task time
=258 hra
:::: 59 minutes
:::: 11 HHjllUUC,)
=1
== 31 minutes
:::: 15 HUJllUU'L"
:::: 1 hour 55 mUlUt(;s.
this was a
aPl:Jrecmble
JHJ'VH;iH"
or
Part Three
PIO,""'W\N
and control
meet
nri'1r.ir,IA<::
contribua to
costs in
The 'engine room' of the lean philosophy is a collection of JIT too1$ and techniques which
are the means for cutting out waste. There are many techniques which couId be termed JIT
techniques and theyfollow on naturally and logically from the overalllean philosophy.
l!I
l!I
l!I
~
i9
i9
Discipline - Work standards which are critical for the safety of company members and the
environment, and for the quality of the product, must be followed by everyone all the time.
Flexiblity - It should be possible to expand responsibilities to the extent of people's capabilities. This applies as equally to managers as it does to shop-floor personnel. Barriers to
flexibility, such as grading structures and restrictive practices, should be removed.
Equality - Unfar and divisive personnel policies should be discarded. Many companies
implement the egalitarian message through to company uniforms, consistent pay structures which do not differentiate between full-time staff and hourly rated staff, and
open-plan offices.
Autonomy - Delegate increasing responsibility to peopIe involved in direct activites of the
business, so that management's task becomes one of supporting the shop floor.
Delegation means such things as giving direct Hne staff the responsibility for stopping
processes in the event of problems, scheduling work and materals arrival, gathering
performance-monitoring data and general problem solving.
Development of personnel- Over time,
aim is to create more company members who
can support the rigours of being competitive.
Quality of working life (QWL) - This may indude, for example, involvement in decision
making, security of employrnent, enjoyment and working area facilities.
Creativity -: This is one of the indispensable elements of motivation. Most of us enjoy not
just doing the job successfully but also improvrng 1t for the next time.
Total people involvement - Staff take on much more responsibility to use their abilities to
the benefit of the compan)' as a whole. They are expected to participate in activties such
as
selection new
dealng directly with suppliers
customers over schedules, quality issues and delivery information, spending improvement budgets and
planning and reviewing work done each day through communication meetings.
In
it i5 difficult to
aH the l;asic working practices at the same time. There are
trade-offs between discipline, autonomy and creativity, for example. It lS best to consider
these basc working practices as goals to be achieved.
Pan Thl"ee
and contror
process on a HUjen",',,-,
HHUlas,vu
so
ABe
15.7 Using sevel"al small machines rather than (me larga eme allows siml..lltaneol..ls
pl'ocessing, is more robl..lst and is more flexible
Ghi:::lnt...y
over
an example).
to
>.u,.. u.,~
reducton
The process of reducing lhe
tlne
to changeover a
process fmm ()ne actvity lo
lhe next; also called single
minute 8xchange 01 dies
afler its origins in the
~e
to
~a
~~
a variety of
such as cutting out
to search for too1s and
equipment,
pre-preparation of
which dday changeovers and the constant practice
routines. Setup
reduction is also caBed
because this was
<
<
<
too1s so
a
is
to
instead of having to be
machine is stopped. Preferably, a11
should be carded out exterup whle
nally, so that the internal setup is an assembly operation only;
attach
different tools to a standard fIXture.
to
a simple and ""'HU'U
loading and ~H,'~~~H''''
as ro11er r"'hV{'V"r<
an:5paTeIlT an
the easier it is
Problems are more easily rtp'fPrr,;
Visibility measures indude things
workplace and an area
to displaying
to share in its
and information becomes simple,
nflFlOv,Rr between
1 lf the
took two hours instead 010ne, how mueh
do you think Jt would have on the usefulness of
the aircraft?
Part Three
and control
A particularly mportant
to >"'4""',,,.<.:
Anden
Alght anove aworkstatioo
that ndlcates its state,
whether worklng, waiting for
work, broken dO'Nfl, etc.,
Andan lights may be
to
stop Li]e whoie llne when one
station stops,
Table 15.1
Factor
Lean
characteristics
Nature of competition
Intl>rf'I,,,,r,n,,,,
Kanban
Delivery practica
True
Local,
fr,,.nAI'!nn
delveres
schemes bacome
Mutual agreement on quallty
Continual nteracton and kazen
18)
as goal
Source: Adapted from lammlng, R,
Prentice HalL
Supply,
Ch"..
Productlservice
IrlHUfrlLl!1tHLItlHV
in
lean ~Y"~''b~
rather than large
a process raute as much as
Reduce the distance travelled
possible and make routes obvious.
Process technology
Job design
Process
and control
m\J",ntn!V
Imt"\rn\!ArnPI"\T
Im."\rnltArn"",T
Maintenance
untl t Is needed.
po"sible because it obscures
nm,np,mq
Al! errors are further sources of waste; everyone In the operation must
be involved in
an error-free state,
it is
or even to
Pal1Three
and control
lIIIc
are recelveCl,
supply of tvvo
or standard containers of
which movement,
or snpply can
"'4O,",J<'-";:>
StageA
Work centre A
Work centre B
Output stock
Empty standard container
FuI! standard container
Output stock
Move kanban
--~......
---.;)10>....
This sequence of actions and the flow of kanbans may at first seem complicated. However, in
practice their use provides a straightforward and transparent method of calling for material
only when it is needed and limiting the
which accumulates between stages. The
number of kanbans put into the loops between the stages or between the stock points and the
work centres is equal to
number of containers in the
and therefore the inventory
wruch can accumulate. Takng a kanban out
loop has fue effect of redudng fue inventory.
Hm!lE1""\
Leve!ied
Pan Three
(a)
Salch size 01
Needtomake
600
A
(b)
A = ISO
B = 50
50
Reduce batch
I..evelled scheduling
si;:e le:
e=
150
A
50
B
50
t i t
50
S
50
t ti i ii ti i i i i i i
50
B
50
1BO
A
50
S
50
50
S
50
150
A
50
B
50
i50
A
50
S
50
150
150
150
50
B
51}
50
B
50
50
B
50
150
A
50
B
50
50
S
50
50
S
50
50
50
r-
must produce:
1
of A every 5 minutes
1 unit of B every 8 minutes
1 unt e every 10 minutes.
Put another way, by finding the common factor
8 and 10:
A
concept to levelled scheduling can be applied to many transportation processes.
For example, a chain of convenience stores may need to make deliveries of all the dfferent
types of products it sells every week. Traditionally it may have despatched a truck loaded
with one particular product around
stores so that each store received the appropriate
amount of the product which would
it
one
This is equivalent to the large
batches
in the previous example. An alternatve would be to despatch smaller
quantities of all products in a single truck more frequently. Then each store would receive
smaller deliveries more frequently, inventory
would be
and the system could
respond to trends in demand more
because more
means more opportunity
to
the quantity delivered to a store. This is illustrated in Figure 15.10.
hwentory
levels
smaller
15.10
""",..IH'i",.,
Ofmaterial
(queue
Cost
Of informatiorl
ef infermatien)
Of customers
(queue of people)
Ties up wr\rfdrln
Needs
",c"',,clInt<m
Prometes
Utilizatlen
Ceordination
Source: Adapteo from Fitzsimmons, J A (1990) 'Making continua! improvement; a competitve strategy tor service
1.G, ano Assocates (eos) Serviee Management Effectiveness,
flrms', in 8owen, DE, Chase, RB"
Jossey-Bass, Copyright 1990 John Wiley &, Sons, Inc" reprinted with permission,
nO"'nTIfV'C
and JIT
in service
found in rnanufacturng industries because
pnKessed in sorne way.
the
examples.
;::,upCI"rn'lrK,el:S usually replenish their shelves only when custorners
r.Vf'm,ont of
taken sufficient
IS
tme.
even
most
the
was
the Mobiie Army
or MASH units made famous In the film and
lrelevision series of the same name. MASH units with iheir
treatment rooms and nn~mt'n('! theatres could be moved
at short
so as to
them close to the action
were needed. In
so
saved
where
fasi access to sultable
thousands of Uves
treatment Also, soldiers with minar wounds could be
treated and retumed to servlce
Now that nr}"l'lnIA
H('ven"";",,
is
usad to
Mobile Parts nV"I-I"'<'"''
These wlll be used to manufacture ""r,lal"ornc.rn
vehicles, tanks and other weapons 'on clemand', close te
the
field ei operaton. Ir is macle possible through
th e
of a
caned ,nc.,r"'""_Uthn,, rl'l,F'\h\l
This makas it pOl',sible to creata soltd
from a
'1 Manufacturing
through the process described
aboye 1s many times more
than
conventionai tAI".hnr,lnr,iA1'l
MRP is
on the accuracy
characteristics 01 JIT
., Dedsion making for operations control ls largely decentralized taetical decisions do not
rely on comput~-based information processing.
~ JIT scheduling is ~rate-based' (calculated in terms of output of a part per unit of time)
rather than volume-based (the absolute number of parts to be made in a given day or
week).
~ JITassumes (and encourages) resouree t1ex.ibility and minimized lead times.
~ JIT planning and control concepts are only one part of a wider and explidt JIT philosophy of operations.
JIT and MRP similarities and dfferences
The irony is that JIT and M:RP have similar objectives. JIT scheduling aims to connect the
new network of internal and external suppIy processes by means of invisible conveyors so
that pars rnove only in response to coordinated and synchronized signals derived from endcustomer demando MRP seeks to meet projected customer demand by directing that items
are produced only as needed to meet that demando However, there are differences. M:RP i5
driven by the master production schedule. which identifies future end-item demando It
models a fixed lead-time environment, using the power of the computer to calculate how
many of, and when, each part should be made. Its output is in the form of time-phased
requirements plans that are entralIy calculated and coordinated. Parts are rnde in response
to central instruetions. Day-to-day distutbances, such as inaccurate stock records, undermine M:RP authority and can make the plans unworkable. While MRP is excellent at
planning, it is weak at control. JIT scheduling airos to meet demand instantaneously through
simple control systems based on kanban. If the total throughput time (P) is less than the
demand lead time (D), then JIT systems should be capable of meeting that demando But if
the P:D ratio is greater than 1, some speculative production wi1l be needed. And if demand is
suddenly far greater than expected for certain products, the JIT system may be unable to
cope. Pull scheduling is a reactive concept that works best when independent demand has
been levelled and dependent demand synchronized. While IT may be good at control, it is
weak on planning.
MRP is also better at dealing with complexity, as measured by numbers of items being
processed. It can handle detailed requirements even for 'strangers'. JIT pull scheduling lS less
capable o responding instantaneously to changes in demand as the part count, options and
colours increase. Therefore, JIT production systems favour designs based on simpler product structures with high parts commonality. Such disciplines challenge needless complex.ity,
so that more parts may be brought under puIl-scheduling control. Putting the relative
advantages ald disadvantages of JIT and MRP together suggests two approaches to blending the approaches.
Separate systams ror different products
>-
Using the runners, repeaters, strangers terminology deseribed earlier, pull scheduling using
kanban can be used fot <runners' and <repeaters~ MRP is then necessary only for strangers,
for which wotks orders are issued to identify what must be done at each stage, and then the
work itself is monitored to push materials through manufacturing stages. The advantage of
this is that by increasing responsiveness and reducing inventories, it makes it worthwhile to.
increase their number by design simplification.
MRP for ovarall control and JIT for internal control
MRP planning of supplier rnaterials airos to ensure that sufficient patts are in the pipeline to
enable them to be calIed up 'just-in-time'. The master production schedule is broken down
by meanS of MRP for supplier schedules (foreeast future demand), while actual materials
requirements for supplies are signalled by means of kanban to facilitate JIT delivery. Within
the factory, al1 materials movements are governed by kanban loops between operations. The
(drum beat' for the factory is set by the faCtory assembly schedule.
Pal1Thl"ee
and control
use
MRP which guide
to use
means
structures
"-
"-
PERT
"-
"-
"
""
MRP
....
....
JIT/MRP
"
"-
"-
"-
Simple
structures
JIT
"\
Simple
Just-in-
What is the lean approach and how is it different from traditional openatons
Many JIT techniques directly concem planning and control, such as:
- pul! scheduling;
- kanban control;
- levelled scheduling;
- synchronization of flow;
- mixed-model schedui1ng.