Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
4 December, 2010)
ABSTRACT: Different cotton varieties have different Physico-Chemical properties and play a
significant role in the quality characteristics of end product. Egyptian cotton varieties have better fibre
physical and chemical properties as compared to CIS varieties. Similarly compact spinning system
proved itself better as compared to ring spinning system to improve the strength related properties of
the yarn at low twist and high spindle speeds. Compact spinning produces a new yarn structure, as the
edge fibres are incorporated into the yarn due to the elimination of the spinning triangle, so that the
harmful effects of the spinning triangle on yarn characteristics are eliminated. The compact yarns
possess less hairiness, better strength, better uniformity and lower values of thick & thin places and
neps compared to the conventional ring-spun yarns. The present study was planned to explore the
physico-chemical study of Egyptian and CIS long staple cotton and spinning potential evaluation at
ring and compact spinning systems under some mechanical variables. This paper endeavors to
optimize the application of best combination of Twist multiplier and Spindle speeds at ring and
compact spinning system for Egyptian and CIS cotton varieties
Keywords: Physico-chemical Analysis of Egyptian and CIS cotton varieties, Mechanical Variables.
more fibre loss. However, in compact spinning, the
drafted fibres emerging from the nip line of the front
roller of the drafting arrangement are condensed in a line.
The other advantage of the compact spun system is the
fly and dust reduction in the department. The cleaning requirement is reduced when compared to conventional
ring spinning frames. The compact-spun yarns tenacity
and elongation (%) values are higher than the
conventional ones, but at the high twist level, the
elongation values of compact and conventional ring yarns
were very similar. Yarn hairiness is very important for
the weaving preparation and process, so compact
weaving yarns have more advantages than conventional
ring yarns in terms of yarn hairiness and yarn strength.
(Celik and Kadoglu, 2004).
INTRODUCTION
Egyptian cotton is the world's finest cotton
because it has some noble characteristics which set it
apart from other natural fibers. The length of the fiber
makes it possible to make the finest of yarns without
sacrificing the strength of the yarn. The strength of the
fiber makes yarn and fabric more solid and more resistant
to stress. Its ability to absorb liquids gives fabrics made
of Egyptian cotton deeper, brighter and more resistant
colors. Its softness feels like nothing else in the world.
Egyptian cotton is hand picked which guarantees the
highest levels of purity (Anonymous, 2007). CIS cotton
is grown in fifteen independent states; Uzbekistan is the
major CIS cotton producer having its share about 60
percent of total production and is the second largest
producer. Tajikistan is famous for fine extra-long staple
cotton varieties (Islam, 1995). Along with the good
quality of cotton, different spinning techniques also have
significant impact on the quality of the yarn and fabric.
Compact spinning technology has been gaining much
more interest since its first commercial introduction by
International Textile Market Association (ITMA)-Paris in
1999. It is a modified ring spinning process which has
special advantages and can be used in both short and long
staple yarn spinning areas. In this system the spinning
triangle is reduced to its elimination. Because the high
area of spinning triangle is unfavorable for getting more
and more fibres in the yarn cross section and provide
CIS
cotton
C4 = Elisa
C5=Sultop
C6= Surex
Twist
multiplier
T.M (T)
Spindle
speed (S)
Spinning
system
(M)
T1 = 3.6
T2 = 3.7
T3 = 3.8
S1= 20000
S2 = 21000
S3 = 22000
M1=Ring
M2=Compa
ct
YARN CHARACTERISTICS
Yarn Evenness (U %): The statistical analysis of
variance and comparison of individual means for yarn
evenness (U %) are given in Table 3. The results indicate
that the effect of cotton varieties (C), twist multiplier (T)
and spinning system (M), spindle speed (s) were highly
significant. The individual comparison of mean values
given in table 3 regarding to U % value for CIS cotton
varieties Elisa, Sultop and Surex and Egyptian cotton
varieties Giza-70, Giza-86 and Giza-88 showed the
significant difference with respect to each other. The
more unevenness value was obtained by CIS cotton
varieties Elisa, Surex and Sultop as 12.022, 11.993 and
11.856 respectively, followed by Egyptian cotton Giza70, Giza-86 and Giza-88 as 10.773, 10.759 and 10.742
respectively. The results of evenness in present
investigation are close in range than the findings of
Ureyen and Gurkan (2008) who concluded that fibre
strength has the greatest effect on yarn unevenness.
Higher strength prevented the fibres from rupture.
Therefore, decrease in fibre rupture increased the
evenness of yarn, as verified by Ureyen and Kadoglu
(2006) who analyzed that yarn unevenness was mainly
affected by yarn count and roving unevenness. Among
fibre properties, strength has the greatest effect on the
yarn unevenness and higher fibre strength lead to a better
yarn evenness value. Comparison of individual means of
yarn evenness due to spinning systems M1 and M2
presented in table 3 showed significant differences with
respect to each other. The highest value of yarn
unevenness is obtained at conventional machine (M 1) as
11.510 percent followed by the modified machine (M2) as
11.206 percent. The present research gets full support
from the findings of Strumillo et al. (2007) who stated
that yarns manufactured by the EliTe compact spinning
Table1.Comparison of individual mean values of fibre Physical properties of Egyptian and CIS cotton varieties
fibre
Mean values having different letters, differ significantly at 0.05 level of probability
Cotton varieties
Mean values of Fibre Physical properties
Egyptian Cotton
Span Length
Length Uniformity
Fibre Strength
Fibre Fineness
Fibre
(mm)
Index (%)
(g/tex)
(mike)
Elongation (%)
C1= Giza-70
35.56a
87.90
40.00a
4.30
5.50d
C2= Giza-86
32.77b
86.70
40.30a
4.50
6.70b
C3= Giza-88
34.80a
88.00
41.00a
4.10
5.10e
CIS Cotton
C4= Elisa
33.02b
85.00
36.10b
4.30
5.90c
C5= Sultop
32.77b
85.80
36.50b
4.60
7.10a
C6= Surex
33.27b
84.90
35.80b
4.20
6.40b
Table.2 Comparison of individual mean values of Chemical properties of Egyptian and CIS cotton Varieties
Cotton varieties
Egyptian Cotton
Cellulose content
(%)
91.05ab
92.00a
90.65ab
C1=Giza-70
C2=Giza-86
C3=Giza-88
CIS Cotton
C4= Elisa
89.50b
1.38a
1.55a
C5= Sultop
90.00b
1.35ab
1.47b
C6= Surex
89.35b
1.40a
1.60a
Mean values having different letters, differ significantly at 0.05 level of probability.
0.62b
0.50e
0.65a
Ash content %
1.14c
0.95d
1.25ab
1.27a
1.19bc
1.30a
REFERENCES
Anonymous. Egyptian cotton [online]. www. egycot. com/
scrollnews. asp?newsid=1 (2007). Anwar, B.
Physico-chemical studies of natural colored cottons
and their spinning Potential.M.Sc thesis. Fibre
Technology Uni. of Agri., Faislabad (2001).
A.O.A.C. Official methods of analysis of the association of
official analytical chemists. 2200 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, Virginia 22201: USA. Edited by Kenneth
Helrich, 15 Edition. (1990).
ASTM Committee. Standard test methods for measurement
of cotton fibres by High Volume Instrument (HVI).
ASTM Standard D 5867-05: 472-479 (2008).