Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Suppose that VINAMILKs balance sheet at December 31, 2012 shows the following:
Current assets
Cash
$4,000
Marketable securities
8,000
Accounts receivable
100,000
Inventories
120,000
Prepaid expenses
Total current assets
1,000
$233,000
Current liabilities
Note payable
$5,000
Accounts payable
150,000
Accrued expenses
20,000
1,000
$176,000
$340,000
SOLUTION
1.Net working capital
2.Current ratio =
current assets
= current liabilities
$233,000
= $176,000
1.32
3.Quick ratio =
current assets inventories prepaid expenses
current liabilities
=
$233,000 $120,000 $1,000
$176,000
= 0.64
4. In comparison with the average current ratio of the same industry, Vinamilk has good liquidity
(1.32 1.29 = 0.03). However, in terms of quick ratio, Vinamilk has difficulty paying for
coming due loans (0.64<1), so Vinamilk has poor liquidity.
Problem 2
Suppose that you are working as a bank staff and offer a loan for your customer to buy a
good house located in the center of Hochiminh City. The house price is USD 5 millions but
your client does not have enough money and he has to borrow from your bank a fourth of this
amount of money. Set up an amortization schedule for this loan to be repaid in equal
installments at the end of each of the next 10 years. The interest rate is 10%.
2
SOLUTION
PVA = $ 5,000,000 = $1,250,000
4
PVA = PMT x
1 (1+ i)n
i
PMT
203,431.74
203,431.74
203,431.74
203,431.74
203,431.74
203,431.74
203,431.74
203,431.74
203,431.74
203,431.74
$2,034,317.44
INT
PRIN. PMT
125,000
117,156.83
108,529.33
99,039.09
88,599.83
77,116.64
64,485.13
50,590.46
35,306.34
18,493.80
$784,317.45
78,431.74
86,274.92
94,902.41
104,392.65
114,831.91
126,315.10
138,946.62
152,841.28
168,125.40
184,937.95
$1,250,000.00
END. BALANCE
1,171,568.26
1,085,293.34
990,390.93
885,998.28
771,166.36
644,851.25
505,904.64
353,063.36
184,937.95
0.00
Case study
Recently after graduating from Local Business College (LBC), you have started your own
investment consultancy firm Prudent Consultants (PCs) to earn your livelihood. Mr. Son, a
regular investor approaches you to get some financial advice on different intended stocks. On
the basis of his preliminary research, Son is curious in reaping the risk and returns associated
with these stocks. For your convenience, he has also brought necessary information regarding
these stocks along with him:
- MAQ Motors possible returns on investment of $10,000 in common stock, over the coming
year is as follows:
3
Economic conditions
Recession
Probability (p)
0.20
Returns (r ) in USD
- 1, 000
Normal
0.60
1, 500
Boom
0.20
2, 500
SOLUTION
r
Recession
r1 =
= -10%
$ 1,500
Normal
r2 = $ 10,000 = 15%
$ 2,500
Boom
r3 = $ 10,000 = 25%
Expected return
$ 1,000
$ 10,000
= P1 x r1 + P2 x r2 + P3 x r3
= (r1 -
r) 2
x P1 + (r2 -
r) 2
x P2 + (r3 -
r) 2
x P3
CV
0.1166 %
0.12%
= 0.97
b) Analyze the price of Wahid Consultant Companys stock in case Mr. Son requires a rate
of return of 16 percent to invest in this stock with this degree of riskiness.
D1 = D0 x (1 + g)
= 2 x (1 + 0.07)
= 2.14
The price of Wahid Consultant Companys stock:
5
P0
2.14
D1
= rs - g =0.16 0.07 = $23.78
c) Identify which stock of Zahoor Company has higher intrinsic value; in case, Mr. Son
wishes to earn a return of 9% on each stock (rS = 9%)
Stock Y :
P0
D1
= rs - g
57
= 0.09 0.07 = $2,850
Stock Z:
P0
54
D1
= rs - g = 0.09 0.07 = $2,700
P0
D1
r Sg =
Dividend yield =
$ 10
25 0 = $40
D1
$ 10
= $ 40
= 25%
P0
D1
r Sg =
$ 11
25 10
= $73.33
Dividend yield =
D1
$ 11
= $ 73.33
= 15%
Based on the results of the intrinsic value and dividend yield of common stock of Ideal
Contractors using Zero Growth Pricing and Constant Growth Pricing Models, we can see the
intrinsic value of stock when using Zero Growth Pricings Model is lower than when using
Constant Growth Pricing Model ($40 < $73.33). But dividend yield of stock when using Zero
Growth Pricings Model is higher than when using Constant Growth Pricing Model (25% >
15%).
Due to the par value of each stock is $100, so when using Zero Growth Pricing, this is
basically the same formula used to calculate the value of a perpetuity, which is a bond that
never matures, pays a dividend that is a specified percentage of its par value and both the
capitalization rate and dividend that is a specified percentage of its par value and both the
capitalization rate and dividend growth rate remains the same every year, then the denominator
doesnt change. Against when using Constant Growth Pricings model, an intrinsic value of the
stick using the average of the dividend growth and projecting that average to future dividend
increases. Therefore, dividend yield of stock when using Zero Growth Pricings Model is higher
than using Constant Growth Pricings model (25%>15%)