Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CHAPTER 5
Parameters are numerical measures of populations. Sample statistics are numerical measures of
samples. An estimator is a sample statistic used for estimating a population parameter.
5-2.
x = 97.9225
s = 51.8303
s2 = 2,686.38
5-3.
(estimate of )
(estimate of )
(estimate of 2the population variance)
x = 2121.667
s = 1737.714
Basic Statistics from Raw Data
Measures of Central tendency
Mean 2121.6667
Median
Measures of Dispersion
If the data is of a
Sample
Population
Variance 3019651.52
St. Dev. 1737.71445
5.5.
Median
Measures of Dispersion
If the data is of a
Sample
Population
Variance 0.12154412
St. Dev. 0.34863178
5-1
5.6.
5.7.
We need 25 elements from a population of 950 elements. Use the rows of Table 5-1, the rightmost
3 digits of each group starting in row 1 (left to right). So we skip any such 3-digit number that is
either > 950 or that has been generated earlier in this list, giving us a list of 25 different numbers in
the desired range. The chosen numbers are:
480, 11, 536, 647, 646, 179, 194, 368, 573, 595, 393, 198, 402, 130, 360, 527, 265, 809, 830,
167, 93, 243, 680, 856, 376.
5.8.
We will use again Table 5-1, using columns this time. We will use right-hand columns, first 4 digits
from the right (going down the column):
4,194 3,402 4,830 3,537 1,305.
5.9
We will use Table 5-1, sets of 2 columns using all 5 digits from column 1 and the first 3 digits from
column 2, continuing by reading down in these columns. Then we will continue to the set: column 3
and first 3 digits column 4. We skip any numbers that are > 40,000,000. The resulting voter
numbers are:
10,480,150
22,368,465
24,130,483
37,570,399
1,536,020.
5.10.There are 7 x 24 x 60 minutes in one week: (7)(24)(60) = 10,080 minutes. We will use Table 5-1
Start in the first row and go across the row, then to the next row (left to right using all 5 digits
in each set), discarding any of the resulting 5-digit numbers that are > 10,080. The resulting
minute numbers are:
1,536 2,011 6,243 7,856 6,121 6,907
5-11.
E X = 125
SE X / n 20/ 5 = 8.944
5.14.The fact that, in the limit, the population distribution does not matter. Thus the theorem is very
general.
5.15.When the population distribution is unknown.
5.16.The Central Limit Theorem does not apply.
5-2
5.17. P is binomial. Since np = 1.2, the Central Limit Theorem does not apply and we cannot use the
normal distribution.
5.18. = 1,247
2 = 10,000
n = 100
1,230 1,247
100 / 10
P( X < 1,230) = P Z
5.19.P
Mean
1247
P(X<x)
0.0446
x
1230
X 8
Stdev
10
= 1 P
55 / 150
55 / 150
= 1 2(.4625) = 0.075
3.6 3.4
Population Distribution
Mean
Stdev
3.4
1.5
Sample Size
n
100
x
3.6
Mean
3.4
Stdev
0.15
P(X>x)
0.0912
5-3
12 13.1
15 13.1
Is the population
normal?
Stdev
1.2
Sample Size
n
36
x1
12
x2
15
800
4,500 / 225
P X 800 = P Z
800
= P
4,500 / 15
p = 0.18
n = 200
P( P .20 ) = P
.20 .18
= P Z
(.18)(.82) / 200
.02
= P(Z .736)
.02717
= .5 .2692 = 0.2308
5.24.The claim is that p = 0.58. We have n = 250 and x / n = 123/250 = 0.492.
P( P .492) = P Z
.492 .58
(.58)(.42) / 250
5-4
4,500 / 15
800
5-25.
Stdev
0.4
Sample Size
n
75
P(>x)
0.0000
x
3
5-26.
n = 16 = 1.5
=2
0 1.5
2 / 16
P( X > 0) = P Z
x
0
Mean
1.5
Stdev
0.5
P(X>x)
0.9987
5-5
5.27.
p = 1/7
.10 .143
< .10) = P Z
P( P
(1 / 7)(6 / 7) / 180
0.0497, a low probability. The sample size, along with np and n(1 p), are large enough here that
the sample distribution (over all the different samples of 180 people in the population) of the
proportion of people who get hospitalized during the year is going to be pretty close to normal.
Therefore, any one such sample proportion will be close to the predicted mean 1/7 with reasonable
probability, and 1/10 is far enough away from that mean given our estimated sample standard
deviation that the probability of falling even farther away than that from the mean is small.
5-28.
= 700
= 100
n = 60
680 700
P(680 X 720) = P
100 / 60
720 700
100 / 60
= 2TA(1.549) = 0.8786
5-29.
p = = 0.35
P
p 0.05
P
(0.35)(0.65) / 500
= 0.0213
< 0.30) + P( P
> 0.40)
= P( P
5-6
0.30 0.35
0.40 0.35
= P Z
+ P Z
0.0213
0.0213
= 1 2TA(2.344) = 0.0190
5.30.
Estimator B is better. It has a small bias, but its variance is small. This estimator is more likely to
produce an estimate that is close to the parameter of interest.
5.31.
I would use this estimator because consistency means as n the probability of getting close
to the parameter increases. With a generous budget I can get a large sample size, which will make
this probability high.
5.32.
s 2 = 1,287
5.33.
5.34.
Depends also on efficiency and other factors. With respect to the bias:
A has bias = 1/n
B has bias = 0.01
A is better than B when 1/n < 0.01, that is, when n > 1/0.01 = 100
5.35.
Consistency is important because it means that as you get more data, your probability of getting
closer to your target increases.
5.36.
n1 = 30, n 2 = 48, n3 = 32. The three sample means are known. The df for deviations from the
three sample means are:
df = n1 + n 2 + n3 3 = 30 + 48 + 32 3 = 107
n 1
s2 =
100
1,287 = 1,300
99
s 2 =
5-7
5.37.
43.667
Deviation Deviation
from meansquared
-9.667 93.45089
7.333 53.77289
-3.667 13.44689
-5.667 32.11489
3.333 11.10889
6.333 40.10689
8.333 69.43889
0.333 0.110889
-6.667 44.44889
SSD =
358
degrees of freedom = 8
MSD = SSD / df = 358 / 8 = 44.75
b) choose the means of the respective block of numbers: 40.75, 49.667, 40.5 minimized SSD =
195.917, df = 6, MSD = 32.65283
mean =
Sample
34
51
40
38
47
50
52
44
37
40.75
49.667
Deviation Deviation
from meansquared
-6.75 45.5625
10.25 105.0625
-0.75
0.5625
-2.75
7.5625
-2.667 7.112889
0.333 0.110889
2.333 5.442889
3.5
12.25
-3.5
12.25
SSD =
40.5
195.9167
c) Each of the numbers themselves. SSD = 0. MSD indicates that the variance is zero, which is
true since we are using each of the individual numbers to reduce SSD to zero.
5-8
50
Deviation Deviation
from meansquared
-16
256
1
1
-10
100
-12
144
-3
9
0
0
2
4
-6
36
-13
169
SSD =
719
5.38.
No, because there are n 1 = 19 1 = 18 degrees of freedom for these checks once you know their
mean. Since 17 is on less, there is a remaining degree of freedom and you cannot solve for the
missing checks.
5.39.
Yes. ( x1 + + x18 + x19 )/19 = x . Since 18 of the x i are known and so is x , we can solve
the equation for the unknown x19 .
5.40.
df = n-k
as k increases, df decreases, SSD decreases, MSD decreases
5.41.
5.42.
E( X ) = = 1,065
V( X ) = 2 /n = 5002/100 = 2,500
2 = 1,000,000
Want SD( X ) 25
SD( X ) = / n = 1,000 / n
1,000 / n 25
n
n
5.43.
1,000/25 = 40
= 53
E( X ) = = 53
= 10
SE( X ) =
n = 400
n = 10 /
5-9
400 = 0.5
Sample Size
n
5-44.
400
p = 0.5
Mean
53
Stdev
0.5
n = 120
)=
SE( P
p (1 p )
=
n
(.5)(.5)
= 0.0456
120
p (1 p )
=
n
(.2)(.8)
= 0.04216
90
) = p = 0.2
5.45.E( P
)=
SE( P
.
5.46.P = 0.5 maximizes the variance of P
p (1 p )
)=
V( P
n
Proof:
)
dV ( P
1 d
1
=
(pp 2) =
(1 2p)
dp
dp
n
n
Stdev
0.02
5-10
P(x1<X<x2)
1.0000
x1
0.72
5.48.P( X
x2
0.82
1.000) = P Z
1,000 1,065
650
= P Z
500 / 10
500
= 53
= 10
n = 400
54 53
52 53
Z
= P(2 < Z < 2) = 0.9544
10 / 20
10 / 20
p = 0.5
n = 120
.45 .5
.45) = P Z
P( P
(.5)(.5) / 120
5-51.
= P(Z
7000 8128.08
2000 / 16
b. P( X < 7000) = P Z
5.52.
1.095) = 0.8632
x
7000
0.06 p 0.10
)=
SE( P
p (1 p ) / n
0.03
Assume p = 0.06:
)=
SE( P
(.06)(.94) / n
(.06)(.94)/n .03
62.66
.03
5-11
5.53.
Random samples from the entire population of interest reduce the chance of a bias and increase
chance of being representative of the entire population. Also, we have a known probability of being
within certain distances of the parameter of interest. We use a frame and a random number
generator or a table of random numbers. A simple random sample is such that every possible set of
n elements has an equal chance of being selected.
5.54.
A bias is a systematic deviation away from the target of estimation. A bias takes us away from the
target parameter in repeated sampling. If the bias is small and variance of the estimator is also
small, the bias may be tolerated, especially if the bias decreases as n increases.
5.55.
The sample median is unbiased. The sample mean is more efficient; it is also sufficient. This is why
we prefer the sample mean. We must assume normality for using the sample median to estimate
. The median is more resistant to outliers.
5.56.
S 2 has n 1 in the denominator because there are n 1 degrees of freedom for deviations from the
sample mean. Using n 1 instead of n makes S 2 an unbiased estimator of 2 .
5.57.
= 44
= 7 n = 50
Stdev
7
Sample Size
n
50
P(<x)
0.0000
5-58.
x
35
95% bounds on X :
1.96 / n = 19.5 1.96(5.3/10) = [18.4612, 20.5388]
90% bounds on X :
19.5 1.645(5.3/10) = [18.62815, 20.37185]
5-12
Symmetric Intervals
P(x1<X<x2)
x1
x2
18.46122
0.95
20.538779
18.62823
0.9
20.371772
5-59.
= 3.9
= 0.5
n = 25
3.0 3.9
= 0.5 + 0.5 = 1.000
P( X > 3.0) = P Z
0.5 / 25
Sample Size
n
25
x
3
P(>x)
1.0000
p = 0.38
n = 100
> 0.30) = P Z
P( P
.30 .38
(.38)(.62) / 100
= .5 + .4503 = 0.9503
where stdev = SQRT(.38*.62)
Sampling Distribution of Sample Mean
Population Distribution
Mean
Stdev
0.38
0.48539
Sample Size
n
100
Mean
0.38
Stdev
0.04854
5-13
x
0.3
5-62.
P(X>x)
0.9503
This estimator is also consistent. It is more efficient than X , because 2 /n 2 < 2 /n.
5.66.
df = 124 3 = 121
a. Normal population requires the smallest minimum n.
b. Mound-shaped population requires the next higher minimum n.
c. Discrete population needs the highest minimum n.
d. Slightly skewed population: n more than for (b), less than for (c).
e. Highly skewed population: n less than for (c), but more than for (d).
The relative minimum required sample sizes are as follows:
n a < nb < n d < n e < n c
5.67.
5.68.
Draw repeated samples, preferably by simulation on a computer, and determine the empirical
distribution of the statistic: the relative frequency distribution of its values.
5-14
5.69.
< .15) = P Z
P( P
5-71.
= 25
.15 .20
(.2)(.8) / 250
=2
n = 100
24 25
P( X < 24) = P Z
= P(Z < 5) = 0.0000003
2 / 10
5.72.P P 0.60
0.07
= P(0.53 P
.53 .60
= P
(.60)(.40) / 200
0.67)
.67 .60
= P(2.02
(.60)(.40) / 200
Z 2.02) = 0.9567
x1
0.53
P(x1<P hat<x2)
0.9567
x2
0.67
1.52 1.57
0 .4 /
200
1.62 1.57
0 .4 /
5-15
= 2TA(1.768) = 0.923
200
5-74.
a) point estimate for the sample mean is 52
Population Distribution
Mean
52
Is the population
normal?
Stdev
2.4
Sample Size
n
40
P(X<x)
P(X>x)
x1
52
5-76
x
0.05
5-16
P(x1<X<x2)
0.4958
x2
53
Sample Size
n
10
P ( X 16000) 0.1202
x
16000
5-77
P(>x)
0.1202
P( X 4.00) 0.0171
x
4
P(>x)
0.0171
5-17
Is the population
normal?
Stdev
0.045
Sampling Distribution of X-bar
Mean
Stdev
1.008 0.00636
50
P(X<x)
P(X>x)
x1
0.99
P(x1<X<x2)
0.6210
x2
1.01
P(X<x)
Is the population
normal?
Stdev
0.01104
Sampling Distribution of X-bar
Mean
Stdev
1.008
0.00156
P(X>x)
x1
0.99
P(x1<X<x2)
0.9000
4) for 95% acceptance: stdev = 0.00861, for 99% acceptance: stdev = 0.00609
5) easier to adjust the mean. The production process will always cause vibrations, etc.
5-18
x2
1.01
6)
Reduction
P(0.99 < X <
1.01)
0.9
0.95
0.99
Stdev
0.01104
0.00861
0.00609
stdev Cost
33.96 $ 172,992.24
36.39 $ 198,634.82
38.91 $ 227,098.22
7)
Reduction
P(0.99 < X <
1.01)
Total
Stdev
stdev
Cost
0.9
0.04302
1.98
588.06
0.95
0.03609
8.91
11,908.22
0.99
0.02749
17.51 $
45,990.02
Cost
$
668.06
$
11,988.22
$
46,070.02
5-19