Page 1

Magistrates Court of Victoria at St Arnaud

15-6-2015

c/o the coordinator starnaudcoordinator@magistratescourt.vic.gov.au

Cc:

Elliott Stafford and Associated lawyers@elliottstafford.com.au

Daniel Andrews Premier Victoria daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au
George Williams george.williams@unsw.edu.au
Re: 20150916 -Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Magistrates Court of Victoria at St Arnaud
cc ES&a LA-05-06-Re Buloke Shire Council-Ill health to travel-etc

Sir/Madam,
due to ill health I am unable to travel to the Magistrates Court of Victoria at St
Arnaud (And cannot risk the safety not only of myself but other road users to travel in an unfit
condition long distances.), albeit I must make clear I do not concede jurisdiction. I am well aware
that the court issued on 20 August 2015 certain orders, as alleged by Alison J May ES&a
Lawyers for Buloke Shire Council, and as the court has ordinary the right to adjudicate if it has
jurisdiction, then without reason of judgment and/or orders being provided and neither transcript
then I have to be careful to avoid any misconceptions. Despite my considerable amount of
writings Buloke Shire Council has not to my knowledge provided any response to prove
jurisdiction and considering its 2 September 2015 correspondence, of which I provided a copy
previously to prove its authentication, then the Court clearly is faced with that on 20 August
2015 it failed to invoke jurisdiction and hence the adjournment of the Summons charges for 17
September 2015 was without jurisdiction and must be withdrawn, and the courts having an
unchallenged OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION can only dismiss the Summons charges for
want of jurisdiction. In my view the court can no longer pursue to allow Buloke Shire Council to
still place (purported) evidence before the court in a way to still try to keep the litigation going,
because it had ample of pre-warning before it instituted litigation and on 2 September 2015
made clear implied or otherwise not to respond to it. It is not for the court to be bias as to so to
say give Buloke Shire Council another opportunity where it clearly failed to do so when it had an
opportunity to do so. Obviously for the court to withdraw its orders of 20 August 2015 and to
issue orders to dismiss the Summons charges for want of jurisdiction the court must provide
appropriate reason of judgment and orders. Hence I have already submitted that it ought to
reserve its judgment so the court can ensure this is not done in a haste and will reflect all relevant
matters. It is beyond me why on earth the court on 20 August 2015 failed to issue appropriate
directions as to ensure I would be fully informed about what transpired at the hearing. It now
appears to me that the court merely so to say acted as a puppet on a string for Buloke Shire
Council and did what it was told and so left it to Buloke Shire Council legal representatives how
they were going to convey what kind of orders might be applicable. This is totally unacceptable!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
Awaiting your response,

G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

Our name is our motto!)

p1
16-9-2015
G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, See also
Http://www.schorel-hlavka.com Blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati